Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Rubio: No presidential administration has ever excepted the war powers act as constitutional

Acyn's profile picture

Acyn

720,658 subscribers

26,704 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Marco Rubio: “No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional,” adding, “we've complied with the law 100%” and will “continue to comply.”
1:25

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Marco Rubio: “No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional,” adding, “we've complied with the law 100%” and will “continue to comply.”

Mario Nawfal

96,999 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Sec. Rubio on war powers vote re: Iran: "Congress can vote on whatever they want, but there's no law that requires us to do that…No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional."
1:23

Sec. Rubio on war powers vote re: Iran: "Congress can vote on whatever they want, but there's no law that requires us to do that…No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional."

Breaking911

40,058 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

SECRETARY RUBIO: The War Powers Act is 100% unconstitutional. This has been the position of every single presidential administration since this law passed. It’s an infringement on the president’s constitutional powers.
0:41

SECRETARY RUBIO: The War Powers Act is 100% unconstitutional. This has been the position of every single presidential administration since this law passed. It’s an infringement on the president’s constitutional powers.

Department of State

72,659 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio deems the War Powers Act UNCONSTITUTIONAL Democrats have failed again. "I want to be clear on the War Powers Act: it's unconstitutional, and EVERY presidential administration has taken that position." 🔥
0:23

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio deems the War Powers Act UNCONSTITUTIONAL Democrats have failed again. "I want to be clear on the War Powers Act: it's unconstitutional, and EVERY presidential administration has taken that position." 🔥

Eric Daugherty

24,061 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Q: Do you think that the United States does need to go to Congress in order to conduct land strikes in Venezuela? Rubio: I'm not going to speculate on that. All I'm going to tell you is that no administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as being constitutional.
0:27

Q: Do you think that the United States does need to go to Congress in order to conduct land strikes in Venezuela? Rubio: I'm not going to speculate on that. All I'm going to tell you is that no administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as being constitutional.

FactPost

266,694 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Rubio: "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%."
1:21

Rubio: "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%."

The Bulwark

62,537 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Trump’s strike on Iran was a fundamental undermining of Congress’s Constitutional Article I powers. We must reclaim that authority, hold this administration accountable, and pass the War Powers Act immediately.
0:41

Trump’s strike on Iran was a fundamental undermining of Congress’s Constitutional Article I powers. We must reclaim that authority, hold this administration accountable, and pass the War Powers Act immediately.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal

11,853 просмотров • 1 год назад

"Under the War Powers Act of 1973, the administration must notify Congress within 48 hours of introducing troops into a conflict. Secretary of State Rubio did that," Congressional correspondent Lisa Desjardins said. "Now, the War Powers Act also says that presidents can only continue that conflict for 60 to 90 days. However, most presidents have ignored the War Powers Act," Desjardins added.
2:01

"Under the War Powers Act of 1973, the administration must notify Congress within 48 hours of introducing troops into a conflict. Secretary of State Rubio did that," Congressional correspondent Lisa Desjardins said. "Now, the War Powers Act also says that presidents can only continue that conflict for 60 to 90 days. However, most presidents have ignored the War Powers Act," Desjardins added.

PBS News

33,144 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Secretary of State Marco Rubio Secretary Marco Rubio said he would “love” to comment on the War Powers Act before declaring it unconstitutional: “The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%.” It’s worth noting that Thomas Massie Thomas Massie recently co-sponsored the War Powers Act with Ilhan Omar Ilhan Omar. Massie, Omar, and the elected Dems are completely lawless.
1:14

Secretary of State Marco Rubio Secretary Marco Rubio said he would “love” to comment on the War Powers Act before declaring it unconstitutional: “The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%.” It’s worth noting that Thomas Massie Thomas Massie recently co-sponsored the War Powers Act with Ilhan Omar Ilhan Omar. Massie, Omar, and the elected Dems are completely lawless.

Loomer Unleashed

69,786 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

"We've complied with the War Powers Act even though we believe its unconstitutional." Sec'y Rubio refutes claims from members of Congress that the Trump administration required their authorization before launching Iran strikes.
0:34

"We've complied with the War Powers Act even though we believe its unconstitutional." Sec'y Rubio refutes claims from members of Congress that the Trump administration required their authorization before launching Iran strikes.

MS NOW

45,079 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Cheers in the House as the war powers resolution passes
0:31

Cheers in the House as the war powers resolution passes

Acyn

1,176,754 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

BREAKING: Marco Rubio is NOT BACKING DOWN to the threats of a democratic lead War Powers resolution over their actions in Iran: "We've OVER COMPLIED with the law and what it requires." "Congress votes on those. They can if they want. There are mechanisms for it and we've complied with the war powers act even though we believe it's unconstitutional as has every other administration. Every other president has found the war powers act to be unconstitutional and nonetheless we notified the gang of eight which was an appropriate mechanism by which to notify congress. We sent a notification within 48 hours the way the law requires." Rubio is NUKING them from orbit!
0:55

BREAKING: Marco Rubio is NOT BACKING DOWN to the threats of a democratic lead War Powers resolution over their actions in Iran: "We've OVER COMPLIED with the law and what it requires." "Congress votes on those. They can if they want. There are mechanisms for it and we've complied with the war powers act even though we believe it's unconstitutional as has every other administration. Every other president has found the war powers act to be unconstitutional and nonetheless we notified the gang of eight which was an appropriate mechanism by which to notify congress. We sent a notification within 48 hours the way the law requires." Rubio is NUKING them from orbit!

Gunther Eagleman™

19,107 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Johnson: "Thomas Massie -- we never agree these days, I'm not sure where his philosophy is coming from ... the president has clearly, clearly fulfilled his responsibility under the War Powers Act, assuming that act is even constitutional."
1:10

Johnson: "Thomas Massie -- we never agree these days, I'm not sure where his philosophy is coming from ... the president has clearly, clearly fulfilled his responsibility under the War Powers Act, assuming that act is even constitutional."

Aaron Rupar

45,409 просмотров • 1 год назад

Duckworth: If that is true and we are not at war with Venezuela, will you advise the president to rescind his invocation of the wartime Alien Enemies Act? Rubio: That was a mechanism to remove people who present danger. Duckworth: This is a wartime act. Are we at war with Venezuela? Rubio: No.
1:23

Duckworth: If that is true and we are not at war with Venezuela, will you advise the president to rescind his invocation of the wartime Alien Enemies Act? Rubio: That was a mechanism to remove people who present danger. Duckworth: This is a wartime act. Are we at war with Venezuela? Rubio: No.

Acyn

112,765 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

In the middle of a major military campaign, critics claim the president must first ask permission from Congress. I explain why that claim is misleading — and why presidents from both parties have rejected the War Powers Act as unconstitutional. I break down the constitutional truth about presidential war powers and why politicians keep using the War Powers Act of 1973 to attack the Commander-in-Chief. The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, but it gives the president the authority to command the military and protect the country. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:
1:18

In the middle of a major military campaign, critics claim the president must first ask permission from Congress. I explain why that claim is misleading — and why presidents from both parties have rejected the War Powers Act as unconstitutional. I break down the constitutional truth about presidential war powers and why politicians keep using the War Powers Act of 1973 to attack the Commander-in-Chief. The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, but it gives the president the authority to command the military and protect the country. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

36,223 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

"No president has ever broken from this precedent in participating in the Presidential Transition Act." -Rep. Jamie Raskin says Trump campaign has ‘refused to commit to a smooth transition’ by not working with administration
1:33

"No president has ever broken from this precedent in participating in the Presidential Transition Act." -Rep. Jamie Raskin says Trump campaign has ‘refused to commit to a smooth transition’ by not working with administration

Morning Joe

55,172 просмотров • 1 год назад

One thing is clear from the all-Senators briefing on the Iran strikes: The Trump admin has no coherent strategy. No end game. No plan. That's why we need to enforce the War Powers Act, and the administration must provide answers.
0:29

One thing is clear from the all-Senators briefing on the Iran strikes: The Trump admin has no coherent strategy. No end game. No plan. That's why we need to enforce the War Powers Act, and the administration must provide answers.

Chuck Schumer

836,774 просмотров • 1 год назад

Speaker Johnson on the War Powers Resolution: "Many respected constitutional experts argue that the War Powers Act is itself unconstitutional. I'm persuaded by that argument. They think it's a violation of the Article II powers of the Commander-in-Chief. I think that's right."
1:10

Speaker Johnson on the War Powers Resolution: "Many respected constitutional experts argue that the War Powers Act is itself unconstitutional. I'm persuaded by that argument. They think it's a violation of the Article II powers of the Commander-in-Chief. I think that's right."

Conservative War Machine

45,763 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 BREAKING: The US House has just PASSED an anti-Trump Iran War Powers Resolution to rein in military action, 215-208 Cheers ERUPT to aid the Iranian regime on the House floor UTTER BETRAYAL! Republican YEAs: Massie, Fitzpatrick, Barrett, Davidson Good thing this WON'T MATTER, as Trump does NOT view War Powers Act as constitutional, even if it passed all the way.
0:34

🚨 BREAKING: The US House has just PASSED an anti-Trump Iran War Powers Resolution to rein in military action, 215-208 Cheers ERUPT to aid the Iranian regime on the House floor UTTER BETRAYAL! Republican YEAs: Massie, Fitzpatrick, Barrett, Davidson Good thing this WON'T MATTER, as Trump does NOT view War Powers Act as constitutional, even if it passed all the way.

Eric Daugherty

1,054,921 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

You keep hearing that the president’s military actions are “unconstitutional” because of the War Powers Act of 1973. I break down the facts. No president — Democrat or Republican — has ever accepted the constitutionality of the War Powers Act. The Supreme Court has never ruled on it, and the Constitution clearly divides authority: Congress can declare war, but the President is the Commander-in-Chief. The framers intentionally rejected giving Congress the power to “make war,” limiting it instead to declaring war, while the president executes military operations and foreign policy. In this clip, I explain the real constitutional structure behind war powers and why the political debate you’re hearing is often more about politics than law. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:
5:28

You keep hearing that the president’s military actions are “unconstitutional” because of the War Powers Act of 1973. I break down the facts. No president — Democrat or Republican — has ever accepted the constitutionality of the War Powers Act. The Supreme Court has never ruled on it, and the Constitution clearly divides authority: Congress can declare war, but the President is the Commander-in-Chief. The framers intentionally rejected giving Congress the power to “make war,” limiting it instead to declaring war, while the president executes military operations and foreign policy. In this clip, I explain the real constitutional structure behind war powers and why the political debate you’re hearing is often more about politics than law. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

43,496 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад