Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Rubio: "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%."

The Bulwark

234,771 subscribers

62,537 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Secretary of State Marco Rubio Secretary Marco Rubio said he would “love” to comment on the War Powers Act before declaring it unconstitutional: “The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%.” It’s worth noting that Thomas Massie Thomas Massie recently co-sponsored the War Powers Act with Ilhan Omar Ilhan Omar. Massie, Omar, and the elected Dems are completely lawless.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio Secretary Marco Rubio said he would “love” to comment on the War Powers Act before declaring it unconstitutional: “The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%.” It’s worth noting that Thomas Massie Thomas Massie recently co-sponsored the War Powers Act with Ilhan Omar Ilhan Omar. Massie, Omar, and the elected Dems are completely lawless.

Loomer Unleashed

69,786 views • 2 months ago

SECRETARY RUBIO: The War Powers Act is 100% unconstitutional. This has been the position of every single presidential administration since this law passed. It’s an infringement on the president’s constitutional powers.

SECRETARY RUBIO: The War Powers Act is 100% unconstitutional. This has been the position of every single presidential administration since this law passed. It’s an infringement on the president’s constitutional powers.

Department of State

72,659 views • 2 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio deems the War Powers Act UNCONSTITUTIONAL Democrats have failed again. "I want to be clear on the War Powers Act: it's unconstitutional, and EVERY presidential administration has taken that position." 🔥

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio deems the War Powers Act UNCONSTITUTIONAL Democrats have failed again. "I want to be clear on the War Powers Act: it's unconstitutional, and EVERY presidential administration has taken that position." 🔥

Eric Daugherty

24,061 views • 2 months ago

JD Vance: "The War Powers Act is fundamentally a fake and unconstitutional law"

JD Vance: "The War Powers Act is fundamentally a fake and unconstitutional law"

Aaron Rupar

7,866,797 views • 6 months ago

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Secretary Rubio just stated that he believes the War Powers Act, which Democrats keep trying to invoke to stop President Trump's Iran operations, is UNCONSTITUTIONAL "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%. Now, this is not the position of me, not the position of the President of the United States now. This is the position of EVERY SINGLE president that has occupied this position since the day that law passed. It's completely unconstitutional. Now, we comply with it in terms of notification because we want to preserve good relations with Congress, right? And we do that, but even as a Senator, I would say that the War Powers Act is 100% unconstitutional."

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Secretary Rubio just stated that he believes the War Powers Act, which Democrats keep trying to invoke to stop President Trump's Iran operations, is UNCONSTITUTIONAL "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%. Now, this is not the position of me, not the position of the President of the United States now. This is the position of EVERY SINGLE president that has occupied this position since the day that law passed. It's completely unconstitutional. Now, we comply with it in terms of notification because we want to preserve good relations with Congress, right? And we do that, but even as a Senator, I would say that the War Powers Act is 100% unconstitutional."

Nick Sortor

111,283 views • 2 months ago

.Secretary Marco Rubio: "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional—100%. Now, this is not the position of me, not the position of President Donald J. Trump now, this is the position of every single president that has occupied this position since the day that law passed... We comply with it in terms of like notification because we want to preserve good relations with Congress... but even as a senator, I would say that the war powers act is 100% unconstitutional."

.Secretary Marco Rubio: "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional—100%. Now, this is not the position of me, not the position of President Donald J. Trump now, this is the position of every single president that has occupied this position since the day that law passed... We comply with it in terms of like notification because we want to preserve good relations with Congress... but even as a senator, I would say that the war powers act is 100% unconstitutional."

Rapid Response 47

204,875 views • 2 months ago

Rubio: No presidential administration has ever excepted the war powers act as constitutional

Rubio: No presidential administration has ever excepted the war powers act as constitutional

Acyn

26,704 views • 4 months ago

"We've complied with the War Powers Act even though we believe its unconstitutional." Sec'y Rubio refutes claims from members of Congress that the Trump administration required their authorization before launching Iran strikes.

"We've complied with the War Powers Act even though we believe its unconstitutional." Sec'y Rubio refutes claims from members of Congress that the Trump administration required their authorization before launching Iran strikes.

MS NOW

45,079 views • 4 months ago

Speaker Johnson on the War Powers Resolution: "Many respected constitutional experts argue that the War Powers Act is itself unconstitutional. I'm persuaded by that argument. They think it's a violation of the Article II powers of the Commander-in-Chief. I think that's right."

Speaker Johnson on the War Powers Resolution: "Many respected constitutional experts argue that the War Powers Act is itself unconstitutional. I'm persuaded by that argument. They think it's a violation of the Article II powers of the Commander-in-Chief. I think that's right."

Conservative War Machine

45,763 views • 1 year ago

BREAKING: Marco Rubio is NOT BACKING DOWN to the threats of a democratic lead War Powers resolution over their actions in Iran: "We've OVER COMPLIED with the law and what it requires." "Congress votes on those. They can if they want. There are mechanisms for it and we've complied with the war powers act even though we believe it's unconstitutional as has every other administration. Every other president has found the war powers act to be unconstitutional and nonetheless we notified the gang of eight which was an appropriate mechanism by which to notify congress. We sent a notification within 48 hours the way the law requires." Rubio is NUKING them from orbit!

BREAKING: Marco Rubio is NOT BACKING DOWN to the threats of a democratic lead War Powers resolution over their actions in Iran: "We've OVER COMPLIED with the law and what it requires." "Congress votes on those. They can if they want. There are mechanisms for it and we've complied with the war powers act even though we believe it's unconstitutional as has every other administration. Every other president has found the war powers act to be unconstitutional and nonetheless we notified the gang of eight which was an appropriate mechanism by which to notify congress. We sent a notification within 48 hours the way the law requires." Rubio is NUKING them from orbit!

Gunther Eagleman™

19,107 views • 4 months ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Marco Rubio: “No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional,” adding, “we've complied with the law 100%” and will “continue to comply.”

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Marco Rubio: “No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional,” adding, “we've complied with the law 100%” and will “continue to comply.”

Mario Nawfal

96,999 views • 4 months ago

"Under the War Powers Act of 1973, the administration must notify Congress within 48 hours of introducing troops into a conflict. Secretary of State Rubio did that," Congressional correspondent Lisa Desjardins said. "Now, the War Powers Act also says that presidents can only continue that conflict for 60 to 90 days. However, most presidents have ignored the War Powers Act," Desjardins added.

"Under the War Powers Act of 1973, the administration must notify Congress within 48 hours of introducing troops into a conflict. Secretary of State Rubio did that," Congressional correspondent Lisa Desjardins said. "Now, the War Powers Act also says that presidents can only continue that conflict for 60 to 90 days. However, most presidents have ignored the War Powers Act," Desjardins added.

PBS News

33,144 views • 4 months ago

Sec. Rubio on war powers vote re: Iran: "Congress can vote on whatever they want, but there's no law that requires us to do that…No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional."

Sec. Rubio on war powers vote re: Iran: "Congress can vote on whatever they want, but there's no law that requires us to do that…No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional."

Breaking911

40,058 views • 4 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: JD Vance says the War Powers Act is "FAKE and unconstitutional" "It won't change ANY of our foreign policy." Purely a useless exercise to move forward with this. FULL STEAM AHEAD!

🚨 JUST IN: JD Vance says the War Powers Act is "FAKE and unconstitutional" "It won't change ANY of our foreign policy." Purely a useless exercise to move forward with this. FULL STEAM AHEAD!

Eric Daugherty

45,789 views • 6 months ago

As the Senate failed to advance a war powers measure for the seventh time on Wednesday that would limit President Trump’s ability to use military force against Iran, Sen. Lindsey Graham called the War Powers Resolution “patently unconstitutional.” “The whole concept of a war powers act is dangerous, absurd, and will lead to just chaos,” Graham (R-SC) said. "You can't have Congress running wars," he added. "If you want to stop war, stop the funding.”

As the Senate failed to advance a war powers measure for the seventh time on Wednesday that would limit President Trump’s ability to use military force against Iran, Sen. Lindsey Graham called the War Powers Resolution “patently unconstitutional.” “The whole concept of a war powers act is dangerous, absurd, and will lead to just chaos,” Graham (R-SC) said. "You can't have Congress running wars," he added. "If you want to stop war, stop the funding.”

CBS News

28,592 views • 1 month ago

In the middle of a major military campaign, critics claim the president must first ask permission from Congress. I explain why that claim is misleading — and why presidents from both parties have rejected the War Powers Act as unconstitutional. I break down the constitutional truth about presidential war powers and why politicians keep using the War Powers Act of 1973 to attack the Commander-in-Chief. The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, but it gives the president the authority to command the military and protect the country. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

In the middle of a major military campaign, critics claim the president must first ask permission from Congress. I explain why that claim is misleading — and why presidents from both parties have rejected the War Powers Act as unconstitutional. I break down the constitutional truth about presidential war powers and why politicians keep using the War Powers Act of 1973 to attack the Commander-in-Chief. The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, but it gives the president the authority to command the military and protect the country. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

36,223 views • 4 months ago

VP Vance: "Every president, Democrat or Republican, believes the war powers act is fundamentally a fake and unconstitutional law. It's not going to change anything about how we conduct foreign policy over the next couple of weeks, the next couple of months."

VP Vance: "Every president, Democrat or Republican, believes the war powers act is fundamentally a fake and unconstitutional law. It's not going to change anything about how we conduct foreign policy over the next couple of weeks, the next couple of months."

CSPAN

22,264 views • 6 months ago

I am voting for a war powers resolution today to stop President Trump from continuing with this unconstitutional war.

I am voting for a war powers resolution today to stop President Trump from continuing with this unconstitutional war.

Kirsten Gillibrand

23,175 views • 4 months ago

🔥🚨 BREAKING — The U.S. House has approved an anti-Trump War Powers Resolution aimed at restricting military action against Iran by a vote of 215-208. Cheers were heard on the floor following passage. Four Republicans joined Democrats in voting yes: Massie, Fitzpatrick, Barrett, and Davidson. The resolution is largely viewed as symbolic since President Trump has long maintained that the War Powers Act is unconstitutional.

🔥🚨 BREAKING — The U.S. House has approved an anti-Trump War Powers Resolution aimed at restricting military action against Iran by a vote of 215-208. Cheers were heard on the floor following passage. Four Republicans joined Democrats in voting yes: Massie, Fitzpatrick, Barrett, and Davidson. The resolution is largely viewed as symbolic since President Trump has long maintained that the War Powers Act is unconstitutional.

The Patriot Oasis™

23,456 views • 1 month ago