Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Rubio: No presidential administration has ever excepted the war powers act as constitutional

Acyn

720,658 subscribers

26,704 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Marco Rubio: “No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional,” adding, “we've complied with the law 100%” and will “continue to comply.”

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Marco Rubio: “No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional,” adding, “we've complied with the law 100%” and will “continue to comply.”

Mario Nawfal

96,999 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Sec. Rubio on war powers vote re: Iran: "Congress can vote on whatever they want, but there's no law that requires us to do that…No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional."

Sec. Rubio on war powers vote re: Iran: "Congress can vote on whatever they want, but there's no law that requires us to do that…No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional."

Breaking911

40,058 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

SECRETARY RUBIO: The War Powers Act is 100% unconstitutional. This has been the position of every single presidential administration since this law passed. It’s an infringement on the president’s constitutional powers.

SECRETARY RUBIO: The War Powers Act is 100% unconstitutional. This has been the position of every single presidential administration since this law passed. It’s an infringement on the president’s constitutional powers.

Department of State

72,872 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio deems the War Powers Act UNCONSTITUTIONAL Democrats have failed again. "I want to be clear on the War Powers Act: it's unconstitutional, and EVERY presidential administration has taken that position." 🔥

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio deems the War Powers Act UNCONSTITUTIONAL Democrats have failed again. "I want to be clear on the War Powers Act: it's unconstitutional, and EVERY presidential administration has taken that position." 🔥

Eric Daugherty

24,061 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Q: Do you think that the United States does need to go to Congress in order to conduct land strikes in Venezuela? Rubio: I'm not going to speculate on that. All I'm going to tell you is that no administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as being constitutional.

Q: Do you think that the United States does need to go to Congress in order to conduct land strikes in Venezuela? Rubio: I'm not going to speculate on that. All I'm going to tell you is that no administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as being constitutional.

FactPost

266,858 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Rubio: "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%."

Rubio: "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%."

The Bulwark

62,537 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Trump’s strike on Iran was a fundamental undermining of Congress’s Constitutional Article I powers. We must reclaim that authority, hold this administration accountable, and pass the War Powers Act immediately.

Trump’s strike on Iran was a fundamental undermining of Congress’s Constitutional Article I powers. We must reclaim that authority, hold this administration accountable, and pass the War Powers Act immediately.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal

11,853 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"Under the War Powers Act of 1973, the administration must notify Congress within 48 hours of introducing troops into a conflict. Secretary of State Rubio did that," Congressional correspondent Lisa Desjardins said. "Now, the War Powers Act also says that presidents can only continue that conflict for 60 to 90 days. However, most presidents have ignored the War Powers Act," Desjardins added.

"Under the War Powers Act of 1973, the administration must notify Congress within 48 hours of introducing troops into a conflict. Secretary of State Rubio did that," Congressional correspondent Lisa Desjardins said. "Now, the War Powers Act also says that presidents can only continue that conflict for 60 to 90 days. However, most presidents have ignored the War Powers Act," Desjardins added.

PBS News

33,144 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Secretary of State Marco Rubio Secretary Marco Rubio said he would “love” to comment on the War Powers Act before declaring it unconstitutional: “The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%.” It’s worth noting that Thomas Massie Thomas Massie recently co-sponsored the War Powers Act with Ilhan Omar Ilhan Omar. Massie, Omar, and the elected Dems are completely lawless.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio Secretary Marco Rubio said he would “love” to comment on the War Powers Act before declaring it unconstitutional: “The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%.” It’s worth noting that Thomas Massie Thomas Massie recently co-sponsored the War Powers Act with Ilhan Omar Ilhan Omar. Massie, Omar, and the elected Dems are completely lawless.

Loomer Unleashed

69,791 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

"We've complied with the War Powers Act even though we believe its unconstitutional." Sec'y Rubio refutes claims from members of Congress that the Trump administration required their authorization before launching Iran strikes.

"We've complied with the War Powers Act even though we believe its unconstitutional." Sec'y Rubio refutes claims from members of Congress that the Trump administration required their authorization before launching Iran strikes.

MS NOW

45,079 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

BREAKING: Marco Rubio is NOT BACKING DOWN to the threats of a democratic lead War Powers resolution over their actions in Iran: "We've OVER COMPLIED with the law and what it requires." "Congress votes on those. They can if they want. There are mechanisms for it and we've complied with the war powers act even though we believe it's unconstitutional as has every other administration. Every other president has found the war powers act to be unconstitutional and nonetheless we notified the gang of eight which was an appropriate mechanism by which to notify congress. We sent a notification within 48 hours the way the law requires." Rubio is NUKING them from orbit!

BREAKING: Marco Rubio is NOT BACKING DOWN to the threats of a democratic lead War Powers resolution over their actions in Iran: "We've OVER COMPLIED with the law and what it requires." "Congress votes on those. They can if they want. There are mechanisms for it and we've complied with the war powers act even though we believe it's unconstitutional as has every other administration. Every other president has found the war powers act to be unconstitutional and nonetheless we notified the gang of eight which was an appropriate mechanism by which to notify congress. We sent a notification within 48 hours the way the law requires." Rubio is NUKING them from orbit!

Gunther Eagleman™

19,107 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Cheers in the House as the war powers resolution passes

Cheers in the House as the war powers resolution passes

Acyn

1,176,754 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

In the middle of a major military campaign, critics claim the president must first ask permission from Congress. I explain why that claim is misleading — and why presidents from both parties have rejected the War Powers Act as unconstitutional. I break down the constitutional truth about presidential war powers and why politicians keep using the War Powers Act of 1973 to attack the Commander-in-Chief. The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, but it gives the president the authority to command the military and protect the country. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

In the middle of a major military campaign, critics claim the president must first ask permission from Congress. I explain why that claim is misleading — and why presidents from both parties have rejected the War Powers Act as unconstitutional. I break down the constitutional truth about presidential war powers and why politicians keep using the War Powers Act of 1973 to attack the Commander-in-Chief. The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, but it gives the president the authority to command the military and protect the country. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

36,223 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Duckworth: If that is true and we are not at war with Venezuela, will you advise the president to rescind his invocation of the wartime Alien Enemies Act? Rubio: That was a mechanism to remove people who present danger. Duckworth: This is a wartime act. Are we at war with Venezuela? Rubio: No.

Duckworth: If that is true and we are not at war with Venezuela, will you advise the president to rescind his invocation of the wartime Alien Enemies Act? Rubio: That was a mechanism to remove people who present danger. Duckworth: This is a wartime act. Are we at war with Venezuela? Rubio: No.

Acyn

112,765 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

"No president has ever broken from this precedent in participating in the Presidential Transition Act." -Rep. Jamie Raskin says Trump campaign has ‘refused to commit to a smooth transition’ by not working with administration

"No president has ever broken from this precedent in participating in the Presidential Transition Act." -Rep. Jamie Raskin says Trump campaign has ‘refused to commit to a smooth transition’ by not working with administration

Morning Joe

55,172 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

One thing is clear from the all-Senators briefing on the Iran strikes: The Trump admin has no coherent strategy. No end game. No plan. That's why we need to enforce the War Powers Act, and the administration must provide answers.

One thing is clear from the all-Senators briefing on the Iran strikes: The Trump admin has no coherent strategy. No end game. No plan. That's why we need to enforce the War Powers Act, and the administration must provide answers.

Chuck Schumer

836,841 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 BREAKING: The US House has just PASSED an anti-Trump Iran War Powers Resolution to rein in military action, 215-208 Cheers ERUPT to aid the Iranian regime on the House floor UTTER BETRAYAL! Republican YEAs: Massie, Fitzpatrick, Barrett, Davidson Good thing this WON'T MATTER, as Trump does NOT view War Powers Act as constitutional, even if it passed all the way.

🚨 BREAKING: The US House has just PASSED an anti-Trump Iran War Powers Resolution to rein in military action, 215-208 Cheers ERUPT to aid the Iranian regime on the House floor UTTER BETRAYAL! Republican YEAs: Massie, Fitzpatrick, Barrett, Davidson Good thing this WON'T MATTER, as Trump does NOT view War Powers Act as constitutional, even if it passed all the way.

Eric Daugherty

1,055,892 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

You keep hearing that the president’s military actions are “unconstitutional” because of the War Powers Act of 1973. I break down the facts. No president — Democrat or Republican — has ever accepted the constitutionality of the War Powers Act. The Supreme Court has never ruled on it, and the Constitution clearly divides authority: Congress can declare war, but the President is the Commander-in-Chief. The framers intentionally rejected giving Congress the power to “make war,” limiting it instead to declaring war, while the president executes military operations and foreign policy. In this clip, I explain the real constitutional structure behind war powers and why the political debate you’re hearing is often more about politics than law. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

You keep hearing that the president’s military actions are “unconstitutional” because of the War Powers Act of 1973. I break down the facts. No president — Democrat or Republican — has ever accepted the constitutionality of the War Powers Act. The Supreme Court has never ruled on it, and the Constitution clearly divides authority: Congress can declare war, but the President is the Commander-in-Chief. The framers intentionally rejected giving Congress the power to “make war,” limiting it instead to declaring war, while the president executes military operations and foreign policy. In this clip, I explain the real constitutional structure behind war powers and why the political debate you’re hearing is often more about politics than law. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

44,094 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten