Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

556,861 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

30 Comments

TheMarbledPolecat's profile picture
TheMarbledPolecat3 months ago

UAZ Bukhanka 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026.

RNG-Investigator's profile picture
RNG-Investigator3 months ago

And the 1965 UAZ is still driving today, while the VW has a major engine failure at 170k km

Emil Pas's profile picture
Emil Pas3 months ago

That russian thing is going to places with such harsh conditions where that VW overengineered BS cannot even dream off.

ITDUDE Fella's profile picture
ITDUDE Fella3 months ago

Definitely

Безумные роботы's profile picture
Безумные роботы3 months ago

Do this in your transporter, silly.

Wulfie's profile picture
Wulfie3 months ago

I'm not a fan of Russia, but why re-inventing the wheel with every new model? If it works, is reliable and easy to repair, why change it? The reason why other manufacturers do it, is just having something "new and innovative" to stay competitive

Ant_fine's profile picture
Ant_fine3 months ago

The author is just a retard, the UAZ is a cheap military all terrain vehicle that successfully gets the job done and doesn't need body or interior updates, whereas the Volkswagen Transporter is a comfortable minivan designed for family needs, a post for the sake of vitriol

Mirosław Kosiorkiewicz's profile picture
Mirosław Kosiorkiewicz3 months ago

Buchanka was simply perfect from the beginning.

Ivan's profile picture
Ivan3 months ago

What have your country? Nothing! Russia have at least this.

Steve's profile picture
Steve3 months ago

If a product works, why change it? The only reason manufacutres keep updating their products is because they know the next idiot will be along in a few minutes to buy it🤣 The T-64 and T-72 are classed as good and highly influential tanks, each representing a major breakthrough in Cold War armor design. The T-64 was an elite, high-tech frontline vehicle, while the T-72 was built as a rugged, cost-effective mass-production workhorse. The West keeps designing new tanks, but all the above still have the ability to destroy them. So, who’s the real idiots here?

Рома's profile picture
Рома3 months ago

Сравнение, впрочем, не вполне корректно: это всё-таки принципиально разные машины и отсутствие прогресса буханки в некоторой степени простительно

Dmitry's profile picture
Dmitry3 months ago

Я обожаю внешний вид Буханки. Честное слово, если бы у меня было много свободных денег, я бы обязательно купил себе Буханку. Просто чтобы стояла у дома и радовала глаз. Ну и куда-нибудь в лес съездить на ней. Видел из Буханки делали автодом. Думаю, я бы так же поступил

Math Nowtsz's profile picture
Math Nowtsz3 months ago

VW is closing its plants and putting 100,000 workers on the street in Germany. A real success story indeed. lol

PDak's profile picture
PDak3 months ago

I want to see those VW on the battlefield...they even can't pass 100m on rough terrain....UAZ cost max 10K USD.... Hope it's clear why it's stay the same...

Alma's profile picture
Alma3 months ago

I remember how cool i looked in elementary school when my father took me to the school by his UAZ before going to work😁 10 years later i drove it too

словянский гиперфонк 🇱🇻's profile picture
словянский гиперфонк 🇱🇻3 months ago

Why upgrade something that's already perfect

Zaur Aliyarov's profile picture
Zaur Aliyarov3 months ago

Но я не видел ни одного VW, который нес на своем борту тактический ядерный боеприпас…

Mc_Knight_Time's profile picture
Mc_Knight_Time3 months ago

I think a good portion of the USA want our companies just to reproduce the older vehicles.

joe adamss's profile picture
joe adamss3 months ago

Russians can put men into space, Germans cannot.

Holy Guardian Anime Conservative Revolution's profile picture
Holy Guardian Anime Conservative Revolution3 months ago

I absolutely love the old‑school form factor – but don’t let yourself be fooled. Anyone who praises these things is either a liar or worm-fag. It’s a rusty tin can straight off the assembly line, where absolutely nothing works properly, and it breaks down like there’s no tomorrow

RedStarTrout's profile picture
RedStarTrout3 months ago

Where's the bit where the Bukhanka turns into a flaming pile of wreckage?

G to the A 🇭🇺🇪🇺's profile picture
G to the A 🇭🇺🇪🇺3 months ago

Put the at the end of the VW lineup and you'll realize UAZ was right :D

Leo11market's profile picture
Leo11market3 months ago

Basically there is also not much change in transporter since 1990. UAZ just came to perfection earlier.

sgmadk's profile picture
sgmadk3 months ago

one can be self fixed and will effectively run forever.

Fabio's profile picture
Fabio3 months ago

Shit remains shit. So ruzzians do

Министр Министерства Восхищения и Сарказмов.'s profile picture
Министр Министерства Восхищения и Сарказмов.3 months ago

УАЗ сразу отличным получился!

Aerialandy's profile picture
Aerialandy3 months ago

And 2026 the new Volkswagen Transporter T7 its a fuckn Ford Transit Custom relabelled with a VW Logo. Made in Turkey... Shut da fugg up, VW is dead

igor's profile picture
igor3 months ago

Вот что значит удачный дизайн. Один раз и на века.

Зая, Доброе Утро🌅's profile picture
Зая, Доброе Утро🌅3 months ago

You can't understand. There are things that need improvement, and there are things that are made perfect from the very start. UAZ is the best car in the world😎

Kirst0leg's profile picture
Kirst0leg3 months ago

Новые машины делают те, у кого старые плохие 😎🤙

Related Videos

RUSSIA'S DIGITAL NIGHTMARE GETS WORSE AS UKRAINE DEFIES WASHINGTON 🇷🇺🇺🇦🇺🇸 Russia is reportedly discovering just how much of everyday life depends on infrastructure that Ukrainian drones can reach. According to an October 13 account by Prof. Bonk, three Yandex data centers were struck within four days, triggering widespread service disruptions, inaccessible digital wallets, banking problems and failures affecting the company's AI-powered services. Ukrainian drone manufacturer Fire Point apparently couldn't resist commenting beneath an apology from Yandex's CEO: "Dima, have you tried turning it off and on again?" The fallout was both absurd and genuinely disruptive. RT chief Margarita Simonyan reportedly found herself declaring, "I am not a robot!" Russian military blogger Fighterbomber lamented losing access to the Alice voice assistant, asking, "How to go on living..." Meanwhile, a woman named Anna in Yekaterinburg reportedly spent six hours trying unsuccessfully to arrange food for her immobile grandmother. Ordinary Russians were struggling with basic transactions while Yandex issued repeated apologies without providing a clear recovery date. Against this backdrop, Moscow's political messaging became even stranger. Putin's envoy reportedly celebrated Trump's criticism of Zelenskyy as "iconic and historic" while floating the idea of a tunnel beneath the Bering Strait, built by Elon Musk's Boring Company, to connect Russia and the United States. But the much bigger confrontation was unfolding over Russian energy infrastructure. The account alleges that Washington pressured Kyiv to stop attacking Russian oil refineries, with Trump reportedly telling the Ukrainians: "You can do whatever you want to Russia; don't hit refineries." A proposed reciprocal arrangement would have restricted refinery strikes by both countries. The problem, as described in the thread, was the enormous asymmetry: Ukraine's single refinery had already been bombed by Russia, while Moscow retained dozens of facilities. Kyiv would effectively be surrendering an important instrument of economic pressure in exchange for a concession offering comparatively little. Russian military commentators reportedly recognized the imbalance immediately. Fighterbomber mocked Trump with the nickname "Trumpampamushka" and questioned why Moscow would voluntarily accept restrictions on attacks against its energy sector when Ukrainian strikes were already causing serious problems. Meanwhile, accounts from the battlefield painted a bleak picture for Russian forces. The thread attributed 50,000 Russian casualties in September, including 28,000 killed, to NATO, although those figures were not independently established in the material provided. Russian military bloggers described assaults being stopped by dense concentrations of Ukrainian drones, difficult conditions in wooded areas and growing frustration over the inability to sustain advances. Some Russian commentators reportedly dismissed claims of a major Ukrainian encirclement near Kharkiv as "the biggest lie of the war." Another military mapping channel described a position as impossible to abandon while simultaneously characterizing the situation as exceptionally dangerous. In Zaporizhzhia, the thread alleged that Russia's 10th Spetsnaz Brigade had suffered 448 killed and 85 captured, figures that likewise remain unverified here. Russian frontline personnel were reportedly crowdfunding basic drones as public interest in supporting the war diminished. One Ukrainian unit, describing a strike on a Russian supply depot, offered a particularly dry account: "The drone hit a fuel barrel, and the rest burned merrily on its own." Then came Kyiv's reported answer to Washington. A senior Ukrainian official told the Financial Times: "We will burn refineries." According to the same account, an oil terminal in Rostov was burning that night. And amid the military losses, refinery attacks, political maneuvering and digital chaos, Russia's troubles produced one particularly fitting image: the company whose services millions rely upon was still trying to explain when everything might start working again.

WW3finalboss

29,973 views • 24 days ago

RUSSIA’S 144TH DIVISION SHATTERED AS UKRAINE CLAIMS 8,000 KILLED AND 277 KM² LIBERATED 🇺🇦🇷🇺 Ukraine’s 3rd Army Corps says Operation Vivaldi achieved something Moscow has repeatedly failed to accomplish: a successful offensive against a numerically superior enemy, with dramatically fewer casualties. Speaking to hromadske, Andriy Biletskyi revealed that Ukrainian forces liberated 277 square kilometres of territory and effectively destroyed Russia’s 144th Motor Rifle Division as an organised fighting force. According to Biletskyi, Ukrainian assaults killed more than 8,000 Russian soldiers and captured another 270, including over 20 officers. Two Russian battalion commanders were also killed during the operation’s final phase. He claims Ukrainian forces suffered seven times fewer total casualties than their Russian opponents. When counting fatalities alone, the difference reached approximately ten Russians killed for every Ukrainian killed. Most Ukrainian casualties were wounded, while most Russian losses were deaths, he said. The territorial figures also expose a remarkable discrepancy between Ukrainian assessments and Moscow’s claims. Ukraine calculates that 277 km² were liberated, but Biletskyi argues the same operation would represent 1,260 km² if measured against territory Russia falsely claimed to control. The strategic consequences could be substantial. Biletskyi says Moscow’s original 2026 plan involved breaking out of its Chornyi Zherebets bridgehead toward Sviatohirsk, splitting Ukrainian forces east of the Oskil River and advancing toward Barvinkove. A simultaneous offensive through Dobropillia was intended to complete an encirclement and help Russia capture the remainder of Donetsk Oblast. Operation Vivaldi disrupted those ambitions. According to Biletskyi, the 144th Division of Russia’s 20th Combined Arms Army is no longer functioning as a coherent formation. Moscow has temporarily abandoned both its wider encirclement plan and a costly frontal offensive against Sloviansk and Kramatorsk, concentrating its main effort around Dobropillia. What makes the operation particularly remarkable is the imbalance between the opposing forces. Ukraine attacked using troops already defending approximately 160 kilometres of frontline, which Biletskyi described as the longest sector in the war. Six months earlier, many of these units had been retreating. Russia had more personnel, more drones and substantially greater artillery firepower. Yet Ukrainian forces managed to reclaim territory instead of simply defending their existing positions. Biletskyi also described how Ukrainian strikes have transformed Russian logistics. Ukrainian forces can disrupt supply movements as far as 150 kilometres behind the front, he said. Russian troops who previously disembarked from vehicles just 10 to 15 kilometres from their positions must now unload 40 to 50 kilometres away and complete the remaining journey on foot. In some sectors, ammunition is transported through human supply chains, with soldiers passing artillery shells between one another over distances of 20 to 30 kilometres. On particularly successful days, Biletskyi claims Ukrainian forces destroy as many as 50 Russian vehicles. These figures and assessments remain Ukrainian military claims and have not been independently verified. Russia planned to encircle Ukrainian forces and seize the rest of Donetsk. Biletskyi says Ukraine instead reclaimed 277 km², captured 270 Russian troops and shattered a division central to Moscow’s plans.

WW3finalboss

41,200 views • 16 days ago