Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🇷🇺RUSSIA🇷🇺 “The attack on Starobilsk changed something inside Russia. Not because it was the deadliest attack. But because it exposed how deep this conflict has gone. For years Russians have watched teenagers recruited into sabotage networks through social media, blackmailed with kompromat, manipulated into carrying out attacks on railways,...

RussCan91's profile picture

🇷🇺 Vanguard-Veritas🇨🇦

5,304 subscribers

21,749 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

For months, I’ve been reporting on a shift in strategy: instead of fighting on the front lines, Ukraine — backed by Europe — has been striking civilian targets inside Russia. Schools. Buses. Apartment buildings. Infrastructure. The goal is to terrorize the Russian public. And how does the Western media cover it? As a "brilliant new military strategy." If any other country was deliberately bombing civilians, it would be called terrorism. But because it’s Ukraine, the media excuses it. As a journalist, the hypocrisy is sickening.
1:26

For months, I’ve been reporting on a shift in strategy: instead of fighting on the front lines, Ukraine — backed by Europe — has been striking civilian targets inside Russia. Schools. Buses. Apartment buildings. Infrastructure. The goal is to terrorize the Russian public. And how does the Western media cover it? As a "brilliant new military strategy." If any other country was deliberately bombing civilians, it would be called terrorism. But because it’s Ukraine, the media excuses it. As a journalist, the hypocrisy is sickening.

Rick Sanchez

21,920 просмотров • 29 дней назад

🇷🇺 A Former Russian Vice Prime Minister on Russia’s Inevitable End Former Russian Vice Prime Minister Poltoranin says that death for Russia will come in any case. He believes that Putin will definitely not win this “special operation”. This will lead to the death of Russia. And even if Putin were to win, that would also provoke the death of Russia. Fascism would begin in Russia. But it is beneficial for Russians for Ukraine to win. He also says that Russia needed to invent a reason to attack Ukraine, which is why they fabricate various lies about nationalists — and Russians swallow this lies without any problem, while the main enemy of the Russian people is Putin himself.
2:05

🇷🇺 A Former Russian Vice Prime Minister on Russia’s Inevitable End Former Russian Vice Prime Minister Poltoranin says that death for Russia will come in any case. He believes that Putin will definitely not win this “special operation”. This will lead to the death of Russia. And even if Putin were to win, that would also provoke the death of Russia. Fascism would begin in Russia. But it is beneficial for Russians for Ukraine to win. He also says that Russia needed to invent a reason to attack Ukraine, which is why they fabricate various lies about nationalists — and Russians swallow this lies without any problem, while the main enemy of the Russian people is Putin himself.

Devana 🇺🇦

126,505 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

The Ukrainians were fed a lie by the Biden administration, who threw Ukrainian bodies into the Russian meat grinder in an effort to weaken Russia. Instead, the opposite happened. Russia is stronger as a result of the war, contrary to the lies being pumped out by the mainstream media. Secretary of State Marco Rubio: “There is one lie—we were told that Ukraine would not only defeat Russia, but destroy it, completely pushing it back to the borders of 2012 or 2014, to Crimea and other territories. But the reality is this: for a year and a half now, Ukraine has been asking for funding to maintain a dead-end, protracted conflict.” “The President's position is that this is a protracted conflict and it needs to end. And it needs to be ended through negotiations. In all negotiations, the parties have to give up something.” “Both sides have an incentive to end the conflict. It will not end with the achievement of the maximalist goals of one of the sides.” Finally, Rubio made it clear that the war in Ukraine has strengthened Russia. "If you look around the world, I would say that in many cases our adversaries are stronger than they have ever been, and have gotten stronger in the last four years. Certainly Russia does not consider itself weaker than it was four years ago. They now control territory that they did not have when Donald Trump left office.”
4:07

The Ukrainians were fed a lie by the Biden administration, who threw Ukrainian bodies into the Russian meat grinder in an effort to weaken Russia. Instead, the opposite happened. Russia is stronger as a result of the war, contrary to the lies being pumped out by the mainstream media. Secretary of State Marco Rubio: “There is one lie—we were told that Ukraine would not only defeat Russia, but destroy it, completely pushing it back to the borders of 2012 or 2014, to Crimea and other territories. But the reality is this: for a year and a half now, Ukraine has been asking for funding to maintain a dead-end, protracted conflict.” “The President's position is that this is a protracted conflict and it needs to end. And it needs to be ended through negotiations. In all negotiations, the parties have to give up something.” “Both sides have an incentive to end the conflict. It will not end with the achievement of the maximalist goals of one of the sides.” Finally, Rubio made it clear that the war in Ukraine has strengthened Russia. "If you look around the world, I would say that in many cases our adversaries are stronger than they have ever been, and have gotten stronger in the last four years. Certainly Russia does not consider itself weaker than it was four years ago. They now control territory that they did not have when Donald Trump left office.”

Ian Miles Cheong

27,943 просмотров • 1 год назад

PUTIN🇷🇺: ‘If Ukraine joins NATO and attempts to bring Crimea back by military means, it means the European countries will automatically be pulled into a war conflict with Russia. Of course, NATO and Russia's potentials are incomparable. We understand it. But we also understand that Russia is one of the leading nuclear states. And with some modern components, it even outperforms many. There will be no winners. And you will be pulled into this conflict against your will. You won't even have time to blink your eye when you execute Article 5.’
1:05

PUTIN🇷🇺: ‘If Ukraine joins NATO and attempts to bring Crimea back by military means, it means the European countries will automatically be pulled into a war conflict with Russia. Of course, NATO and Russia's potentials are incomparable. We understand it. But we also understand that Russia is one of the leading nuclear states. And with some modern components, it even outperforms many. There will be no winners. And you will be pulled into this conflict against your will. You won't even have time to blink your eye when you execute Article 5.’

Afshin Rattansi

670,500 просмотров • 13 дней назад

Ukraine is a piece of land being used by the West to provoke Russia into reaction. Ukraine's modern history: the coup -> the anti-Russian leadership -> the attacks on ethnic Russians -> the hundreds of billions for weapons, intel and sabotage. This was never really about “saving Ukraine.” The best Europe can do to "save" Ukraine is to leave it alone, but again, that's just not on their radar. Watch FULL here:
0:45

Ukraine is a piece of land being used by the West to provoke Russia into reaction. Ukraine's modern history: the coup -> the anti-Russian leadership -> the attacks on ethnic Russians -> the hundreds of billions for weapons, intel and sabotage. This was never really about “saving Ukraine.” The best Europe can do to "save" Ukraine is to leave it alone, but again, that's just not on their radar. Watch FULL here:

Rick Sanchez

476,292 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨Do You Think Russia Doesn't Know Any of this History? 🚨Former British Diplomat Alastair Crooke: What is the AIM of this war for America? 🚨It's the same aim that's been there for NEARLY 200 years: to BREAK UP Russia, to PARTITION it into its SEPARATE PARTS and to STEAL its RESOURCES. We've seen it happens three times now that this war has been waged on Russia. You have to think what Russians feel about this because even during the Second World War, when Russia was an ally fighting the Germans, at some point Britain was supposed to support Russia, provide assistance to Russia who was stuck in Leningrad at that time. And what happened? Well, Churchill whispered to Roosevelt and he said, look, you know, maybe the reserves should be delayed in going there because isn't it better that they just kill more of each other during this time? Isn't that better? Does it really think that this whole war started suddenly on the date that Russia invaded Ukraine after Kiev increased the attacks on Donbas by a factor of 17, the artillery shelling of the civilian areas of Donbas? It was obviously intended to provoke Russia into this attack in order to try and turn it into a NATO-wide conflict against Russia. But the Russians, I mean, you know, they know their history. I mean, unlike us, they do study history. They know their history.
3:09

🚨Do You Think Russia Doesn't Know Any of this History? 🚨Former British Diplomat Alastair Crooke: What is the AIM of this war for America? 🚨It's the same aim that's been there for NEARLY 200 years: to BREAK UP Russia, to PARTITION it into its SEPARATE PARTS and to STEAL its RESOURCES. We've seen it happens three times now that this war has been waged on Russia. You have to think what Russians feel about this because even during the Second World War, when Russia was an ally fighting the Germans, at some point Britain was supposed to support Russia, provide assistance to Russia who was stuck in Leningrad at that time. And what happened? Well, Churchill whispered to Roosevelt and he said, look, you know, maybe the reserves should be delayed in going there because isn't it better that they just kill more of each other during this time? Isn't that better? Does it really think that this whole war started suddenly on the date that Russia invaded Ukraine after Kiev increased the attacks on Donbas by a factor of 17, the artillery shelling of the civilian areas of Donbas? It was obviously intended to provoke Russia into this attack in order to try and turn it into a NATO-wide conflict against Russia. But the Russians, I mean, you know, they know their history. I mean, unlike us, they do study history. They know their history.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

14,954 просмотров • 18 дней назад

🇷🇺⚡The Russian Intelligence forces, FSB has detained 8 teenagers who carried out arson on communication and transport facilities. The group was contacted by a Ukrainian through the messenger app. And then many ask why Russia bans most of these western apps. The western companies have been requested to release data on users for security reasons and prevent possible future terrorist attacks but Russia has been rejected although the companies are obligated to. These companies are complicit in these attacks. The teenagers could face up to or more than 10yrs behind bars. Still unclear if this was done for money or liberal beliefs.
0:28

🇷🇺⚡The Russian Intelligence forces, FSB has detained 8 teenagers who carried out arson on communication and transport facilities. The group was contacted by a Ukrainian through the messenger app. And then many ask why Russia bans most of these western apps. The western companies have been requested to release data on users for security reasons and prevent possible future terrorist attacks but Russia has been rejected although the companies are obligated to. These companies are complicit in these attacks. The teenagers could face up to or more than 10yrs behind bars. Still unclear if this was done for money or liberal beliefs.

Spetsnaℤ 007 🇷🇺

61,955 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

With Ukraine losing ground on the battlefield, the strategy appears to be shifting toward asymmetric strikes designed for headlines as much as for military effect. The idea is simple: hit infrastructure inside Russia, create dramatic images, and turn that into a narrative of momentum in Western media. But the effect inside Russia may be the opposite. Instead of weakening support, these attacks are fueling anger and calls for a much harder response — at a time when many analysts say Russia’s military position is stronger than NATO’s.
1:29

With Ukraine losing ground on the battlefield, the strategy appears to be shifting toward asymmetric strikes designed for headlines as much as for military effect. The idea is simple: hit infrastructure inside Russia, create dramatic images, and turn that into a narrative of momentum in Western media. But the effect inside Russia may be the opposite. Instead of weakening support, these attacks are fueling anger and calls for a much harder response — at a time when many analysts say Russia’s military position is stronger than NATO’s.

Rick Sanchez

24,575 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🔥 “A period of hysteria in Europe — and Moscow isn’t buying it.” Former British diplomat Alastair Crooke (Alastair Crooke) breaks down what he saw on the ground in Russia… and it’s not what Western leaders are telling you. 🇪🇺 Europe is spiraling into fear of a future Russian invasion, but Crooke says Russia has “absolutely no interest in coming into Europe — none.” 🇷🇺 After a recent conference he attended in Moscow, he says Russians now see Europe as “weak” and culturally unfocused. 🧭 Russia isn’t even interested in potential westward conquest, he said, because “they’ve got enough land, enough resources of their own" and have neither the interest nor need to conquer anyone. ⚠️ So why the escalating rhetoric in Europe? And what does it mean for the next phase of the conflict? A troubling trend: Western elites that cannot detach from a view of the world post 1990 that no longer exists. If they do not join the real world, they may drag us all into a war that we cannot win - and if it goes nuclear, could destroy us all. 🎥Watch the full exchange on Daniel Davis Deep Dive: Hysteria from the West: Preparing for War w/ Russia: 👉 #Russia #Europe #Geopolitics #UkraineWar #ForeignPolicy #DanielDavisDeepDive #AlastairCrooke #SecurityAnalysis #GlobalAffairs #NATO
0:57

🔥 “A period of hysteria in Europe — and Moscow isn’t buying it.” Former British diplomat Alastair Crooke (Alastair Crooke) breaks down what he saw on the ground in Russia… and it’s not what Western leaders are telling you. 🇪🇺 Europe is spiraling into fear of a future Russian invasion, but Crooke says Russia has “absolutely no interest in coming into Europe — none.” 🇷🇺 After a recent conference he attended in Moscow, he says Russians now see Europe as “weak” and culturally unfocused. 🧭 Russia isn’t even interested in potential westward conquest, he said, because “they’ve got enough land, enough resources of their own" and have neither the interest nor need to conquer anyone. ⚠️ So why the escalating rhetoric in Europe? And what does it mean for the next phase of the conflict? A troubling trend: Western elites that cannot detach from a view of the world post 1990 that no longer exists. If they do not join the real world, they may drag us all into a war that we cannot win - and if it goes nuclear, could destroy us all. 🎥Watch the full exchange on Daniel Davis Deep Dive: Hysteria from the West: Preparing for War w/ Russia: 👉 #Russia #Europe #Geopolitics #UkraineWar #ForeignPolicy #DanielDavisDeepDive #AlastairCrooke #SecurityAnalysis #GlobalAffairs #NATO

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

37,067 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

A large-scale attack on Kiev last night and a continued naval blockade on Ukraine. NATO's strategy of increasing deep strikes into Russia to weaken Russia's economy and make Russian civil society also feel the pain of war is a disastrous plan - for Ukraine. Why does NATO go up the escalation ladder at a time when Ukraine has run out of air defence missiles? Russia always had the option to intensify strikes on Kiev and impose a naval blockade to make Ukraine a de facto landlocked country. However, this was reserved as a step further up the escalation ladder. When the NATO political class pursued this strategy and their mouthpieces in the media uncritically celebrated the attacks on Russian civilian ships and commercial targets deep inside Russia, they certainly knew that it would trigger a response from Russia. However, this is the luxury of fighting a proxy war. NATO does not pay any cost yet, as the Russian retaliation is aimed against Ukrainian targets.
0:37

A large-scale attack on Kiev last night and a continued naval blockade on Ukraine. NATO's strategy of increasing deep strikes into Russia to weaken Russia's economy and make Russian civil society also feel the pain of war is a disastrous plan - for Ukraine. Why does NATO go up the escalation ladder at a time when Ukraine has run out of air defence missiles? Russia always had the option to intensify strikes on Kiev and impose a naval blockade to make Ukraine a de facto landlocked country. However, this was reserved as a step further up the escalation ladder. When the NATO political class pursued this strategy and their mouthpieces in the media uncritically celebrated the attacks on Russian civilian ships and commercial targets deep inside Russia, they certainly knew that it would trigger a response from Russia. However, this is the luxury of fighting a proxy war. NATO does not pay any cost yet, as the Russian retaliation is aimed against Ukrainian targets.

Glenn Diesen

387,624 просмотров • 10 дней назад

🔥MUST WATCH. Jack Posobiec says “President Trump has run an END AROUND ON THE GLOBALISTS” in his effort to secure peace between Russia & Ukraine. He’s correct and has been saying this was the only way for it be achieved. Mike Benz joins him who notes that Putin & Zelensky were not the true hinders to peace but the LEGACY D.C. INTERNATIONALIST BLOB CORE in conjunction the EU/NATO BLOB CORP. Mike is 1000% correct on this and they have actively sabotaged peace for months. Mike also highlights that this only came about because of the Maidan Coup of 2014 which effectively split Ukraine into the Western NATO/US controlled part of the nation and the “RUSSIAN AFFINITY” Eastern portion of Ukraine. He highlights how Pompeo was in Europe right before the largest attack on Russia which halted peace talks and the targeted attacks on Russian speaking citizens in the Eastern part of Ukraine for YEARS. Jack Poso 🇺🇸 highlights the symbolism of it taking place in Russia since this was land first discovered by them and America was “FOUNDED AMONGST EMPIRES”
7:13

🔥MUST WATCH. Jack Posobiec says “President Trump has run an END AROUND ON THE GLOBALISTS” in his effort to secure peace between Russia & Ukraine. He’s correct and has been saying this was the only way for it be achieved. Mike Benz joins him who notes that Putin & Zelensky were not the true hinders to peace but the LEGACY D.C. INTERNATIONALIST BLOB CORE in conjunction the EU/NATO BLOB CORP. Mike is 1000% correct on this and they have actively sabotaged peace for months. Mike also highlights that this only came about because of the Maidan Coup of 2014 which effectively split Ukraine into the Western NATO/US controlled part of the nation and the “RUSSIAN AFFINITY” Eastern portion of Ukraine. He highlights how Pompeo was in Europe right before the largest attack on Russia which halted peace talks and the targeted attacks on Russian speaking citizens in the Eastern part of Ukraine for YEARS. Jack Poso 🇺🇸 highlights the symbolism of it taking place in Russia since this was land first discovered by them and America was “FOUNDED AMONGST EMPIRES”

Johnny St.Pete

26,932 просмотров • 1 год назад

You may not have believed this IDIOT said what he Said... so here it is on a VIDEO CLIP !!! BASICALLLY, USA will officially give MISSILES to KIEV....so they can launch into RUSSIA and make Russian stop!!! These guys are TOTALLY FUCKING MAD ! Rubio on how strikes deep into Russia create conditions for peace talks: "I think you're discussing Ukraine's ability to penetrate deep into Russian territory and launch strikes. I think that's one of the dynamics that has changed in this war over the past few months: it's become more difficult for the Russians to defend their own airspace. And we hope that this will create the conditions for negotiations to end this war. Trump: "This is an escalation, but it's also an escalation that could help bring about an end to the war." That's right, it's an escalation, and it could bring about an end to the war. But on whose terms? Of course, on the terms of whoever is carrying out this escalation. That is, on the terms of the West and Ukraine. And the conditions are well-known: Russia's capitulation. Therefore, to end the war on its own terms, Russia must escalate the war itself. I've written about this many times already. And all the Russians are demanding it. But who would believe???
0:23

You may not have believed this IDIOT said what he Said... so here it is on a VIDEO CLIP !!! BASICALLLY, USA will officially give MISSILES to KIEV....so they can launch into RUSSIA and make Russian stop!!! These guys are TOTALLY FUCKING MAD ! Rubio on how strikes deep into Russia create conditions for peace talks: "I think you're discussing Ukraine's ability to penetrate deep into Russian territory and launch strikes. I think that's one of the dynamics that has changed in this war over the past few months: it's become more difficult for the Russians to defend their own airspace. And we hope that this will create the conditions for negotiations to end this war. Trump: "This is an escalation, but it's also an escalation that could help bring about an end to the war." That's right, it's an escalation, and it could bring about an end to the war. But on whose terms? Of course, on the terms of whoever is carrying out this escalation. That is, on the terms of the West and Ukraine. And the conditions are well-known: Russia's capitulation. Therefore, to end the war on its own terms, Russia must escalate the war itself. I've written about this many times already. And all the Russians are demanding it. But who would believe???

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺🇮🇪

20,073 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨🇮🇳🇷🇺 'They knew exactly what they were hitting': Ex-Indian intel officer on Ukraine's terror attack in Lugansk People's Republic The Starobelsk terror attack was a deliberate strike on a college dormitory and an educational building housing teenagers on 22 May. Ex-Indian intelligence officer Lucky Bisht to Sputnik India: 👇 🔸21 children killed and over 40-45 people injured in a calculated attack. The coordinates were checked and rechecked. These are not random decisions. Drones and missiles do not simply wander into civilian targets — especially not a children's facility. "Ukraine is just the visible face," he warned. "Behind it are NATO, Britain, and the US. They cannot win a direct war with Russia, so they use proxies and target the innocent to spread fear." 🔸They are prepared to go to any lengths. This is psychological warfare designed to break the will of the Russian people and send a chilling warning to anyone watching. 🔸And it does not stop in Ukraine. NATO's real target is every nation that dares maintain ties with Russia — Venezuela, Iran, and yes, India itself. New Delhi has faced relentless pressure to stop buying Russian oil and abandon defence deals. The goal? Isolate Russia completely. Crush any independent voice on the global stage. 🔸This is not about allegedly "defending Ukraine." It is about maintaining unipolar dominance at any cost — even if that cost is the lives of children.
1:31

🚨🇮🇳🇷🇺 'They knew exactly what they were hitting': Ex-Indian intel officer on Ukraine's terror attack in Lugansk People's Republic The Starobelsk terror attack was a deliberate strike on a college dormitory and an educational building housing teenagers on 22 May. Ex-Indian intelligence officer Lucky Bisht to Sputnik India: 👇 🔸21 children killed and over 40-45 people injured in a calculated attack. The coordinates were checked and rechecked. These are not random decisions. Drones and missiles do not simply wander into civilian targets — especially not a children's facility. "Ukraine is just the visible face," he warned. "Behind it are NATO, Britain, and the US. They cannot win a direct war with Russia, so they use proxies and target the innocent to spread fear." 🔸They are prepared to go to any lengths. This is psychological warfare designed to break the will of the Russian people and send a chilling warning to anyone watching. 🔸And it does not stop in Ukraine. NATO's real target is every nation that dares maintain ties with Russia — Venezuela, Iran, and yes, India itself. New Delhi has faced relentless pressure to stop buying Russian oil and abandon defence deals. The goal? Isolate Russia completely. Crush any independent voice on the global stage. 🔸This is not about allegedly "defending Ukraine." It is about maintaining unipolar dominance at any cost — even if that cost is the lives of children.

Sputnik India

41,630 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The West has always tried to tear multinational Russia apart with its favorite divide and rule playbook. Russia has answered differently throughout its history. People of different faiths and ethnicities lived together in the empire and identified as Russians, became Soviet people together, and after 1991 identify as Russians again. Not because they're forced to, but because they choose to. A Russian is someone who belongs to the cultural code of Russia, something that goes deep into centuries. No blood tests, no race charts, no passport entries… In 2023, Putin explained: “ Russian is the one who loves Russia and serves it.” That's a civilizational answer to Western identity politics, and it's exactly why Russia hasn't broken, no matter how hard it's been pushed.
0:47

The West has always tried to tear multinational Russia apart with its favorite divide and rule playbook. Russia has answered differently throughout its history. People of different faiths and ethnicities lived together in the empire and identified as Russians, became Soviet people together, and after 1991 identify as Russians again. Not because they're forced to, but because they choose to. A Russian is someone who belongs to the cultural code of Russia, something that goes deep into centuries. No blood tests, no race charts, no passport entries… In 2023, Putin explained: “ Russian is the one who loves Russia and serves it.” That's a civilizational answer to Western identity politics, and it's exactly why Russia hasn't broken, no matter how hard it's been pushed.

Rina Lu🇷🇺

21,418 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Putin was celebrated by the West only as long as he was perceived as “aspiring towards the good” — which in Russophobic terms meant acting against historic Russian interests. The West’s acceptance of Russia was always conditional — not on what Russia did, but on whether Russia weakened itself. As Alexander Mercouris put it: “The good Russian is the one who chooses the West. The bad Russian is the one that sticks to Russia because Russia is evil.” Putin received standing ovations in the early years precisely because he appeared to be acting against historic Russian interests. The moment he began defending them, he became the enemy. This is the core of the Russophobic trap. If Russia cooperates, it’s because the West is “guiding” it. If Russia defends itself, it proves the stereotypes true. Either way, Russia can never win acceptance on its own terms. Decades of cooperation never built lasting trust. The system cannot accept a Russia that asserts itself — that would challenge the entire ideological framework. Any Russian leader who puts national interests first automatically becomes the villain, confirming the very hostility used to justify the conflict. The confrontation was structurally predetermined.
2:02

Putin was celebrated by the West only as long as he was perceived as “aspiring towards the good” — which in Russophobic terms meant acting against historic Russian interests. The West’s acceptance of Russia was always conditional — not on what Russia did, but on whether Russia weakened itself. As Alexander Mercouris put it: “The good Russian is the one who chooses the West. The bad Russian is the one that sticks to Russia because Russia is evil.” Putin received standing ovations in the early years precisely because he appeared to be acting against historic Russian interests. The moment he began defending them, he became the enemy. This is the core of the Russophobic trap. If Russia cooperates, it’s because the West is “guiding” it. If Russia defends itself, it proves the stereotypes true. Either way, Russia can never win acceptance on its own terms. Decades of cooperation never built lasting trust. The system cannot accept a Russia that asserts itself — that would challenge the entire ideological framework. Any Russian leader who puts national interests first automatically becomes the villain, confirming the very hostility used to justify the conflict. The confrontation was structurally predetermined.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

16,769 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

1. Russia attacks NATO member Romania. 2. All European NATO leaders immediately excuse the Russian military attack that targeted civilians as accidental on Russia's behalf, despite Russia not claiming that it was an accident. (Odd right?) 3. Deputy Chairman of Russia’s Security Council Medvedev confirms the attack on NATO and tells the Europeans: "Shut up. This is just the beginning." Says more attacks on NATO are coming. Is it time for some European NATO members to give Russia some of their land and people in the name of "peace," as they'd been pressuring Ukraine to do for 12 years? According to them there is no military solution when Russia attacks - only negotiations. Get on it, you cowards.
0:28

1. Russia attacks NATO member Romania. 2. All European NATO leaders immediately excuse the Russian military attack that targeted civilians as accidental on Russia's behalf, despite Russia not claiming that it was an accident. (Odd right?) 3. Deputy Chairman of Russia’s Security Council Medvedev confirms the attack on NATO and tells the Europeans: "Shut up. This is just the beginning." Says more attacks on NATO are coming. Is it time for some European NATO members to give Russia some of their land and people in the name of "peace," as they'd been pressuring Ukraine to do for 12 years? According to them there is no military solution when Russia attacks - only negotiations. Get on it, you cowards.

Igor Sushko

117,312 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Alastair Crooke’s (Alastair Crooke) assessment cuts to the continuous Anglo-American policy of partitioning Russia and seizing its resources—a project spanning two centuries and three major wars. The current NATO escalation with long-range strikes is the latest iteration of that same imperial design. Russia knows this history in full. Any durable resolution requires the acknowledgment of those realities that John F. Kennedy began to voice before his assassination, not the childish, decontextualized propaganda now dominating Western discourse. “There will soon be an escalation by Russia against a close ally of the United States—against Europe. This is going to come sooner or later because the Europeans, encouraged and backed by the United States, insist on building, constructing, and designing longer- and longer-range cruise missiles and drones to attack deeper into Russia and to attack targets completely unrelated to the war effort. These attacks on the Wildberries warehouses—Wildberries is like Amazon. What would you say if Russia started attacking Amazon warehouses? You would say, “What the hell is all this about?” That is the question that needs to be asked. What is the aim of this war for America that they say they are going to win? We know, because it is the same aim that has been there for nearly 200 years: to break up Russia, to partition it into its separate component parts, and to steal its resources. We have seen it happen three times now that war has been waged on Russia. The German war was one about empire too—expanding its empire. It was envious of Britain. Britain had India and all the resources of the East, which it plundered and made itself rich. Then Britain started preparing for war against Russia. Even during the Second World War, when Russia was an ally fighting the Germans, at some point Britain was supposed to support Russia and provide assistance to Russia, who was stuck in Leningrad at that time. What happened? Churchill whispered to Roosevelt and said, “Look, maybe the reserves should be delayed in going there because isn’t it better that they just kill more of each other during this time? Isn’t that better?” Then again, after the war, Churchill and Roosevelt signed this agreement to send everybody back to Stalin. There were Cossack units sent back whole to be lined up and executed. He sent back millions, refused to allow them to stay anywhere, and they came to this agreement to send them back so that they could be tried, hooded, and then executed for their betrayal of the Soviet Union. There were some desperate things. Do you think Russia does not know any of this history? Does it not know it? Does it really think that this whole war started suddenly on the date that Russia invaded Ukraine—after Kiev increased the attacks on Donbas by a factor of 17, the artillery shelling of the civilian areas of Donbas? It was obviously intended to provoke Russia into this attack in order to try to turn it into a NATO-wide conflict against Russia. But the Russians know their history. Unlike us, they do study history. They know their history. This is a bitter conflict—long, many grudges, much ill feeling in it. But someone has to sit down. In my view, the first step was the step JFK actually took before he was assassinated, when he started to say we should acknowledge how much Russia lost fighting with us in the Second World War—how many men they lost, 27 million, how many people were lost. We should start from saying something like that. There has to be some sort of acknowledgment of the realities of what it is—not this crude, childish reducing of everything, without any context, to a decontextualized world: “Oh, Russia, it just came into Putin’s head that he wanted to be an emperor again, and so he took part of Ukraine.” This is the sort of stuff you would not even get from a seven-year-old child writing an essay at school.”
5:22

Alastair Crooke’s (Alastair Crooke) assessment cuts to the continuous Anglo-American policy of partitioning Russia and seizing its resources—a project spanning two centuries and three major wars. The current NATO escalation with long-range strikes is the latest iteration of that same imperial design. Russia knows this history in full. Any durable resolution requires the acknowledgment of those realities that John F. Kennedy began to voice before his assassination, not the childish, decontextualized propaganda now dominating Western discourse. “There will soon be an escalation by Russia against a close ally of the United States—against Europe. This is going to come sooner or later because the Europeans, encouraged and backed by the United States, insist on building, constructing, and designing longer- and longer-range cruise missiles and drones to attack deeper into Russia and to attack targets completely unrelated to the war effort. These attacks on the Wildberries warehouses—Wildberries is like Amazon. What would you say if Russia started attacking Amazon warehouses? You would say, “What the hell is all this about?” That is the question that needs to be asked. What is the aim of this war for America that they say they are going to win? We know, because it is the same aim that has been there for nearly 200 years: to break up Russia, to partition it into its separate component parts, and to steal its resources. We have seen it happen three times now that war has been waged on Russia. The German war was one about empire too—expanding its empire. It was envious of Britain. Britain had India and all the resources of the East, which it plundered and made itself rich. Then Britain started preparing for war against Russia. Even during the Second World War, when Russia was an ally fighting the Germans, at some point Britain was supposed to support Russia and provide assistance to Russia, who was stuck in Leningrad at that time. What happened? Churchill whispered to Roosevelt and said, “Look, maybe the reserves should be delayed in going there because isn’t it better that they just kill more of each other during this time? Isn’t that better?” Then again, after the war, Churchill and Roosevelt signed this agreement to send everybody back to Stalin. There were Cossack units sent back whole to be lined up and executed. He sent back millions, refused to allow them to stay anywhere, and they came to this agreement to send them back so that they could be tried, hooded, and then executed for their betrayal of the Soviet Union. There were some desperate things. Do you think Russia does not know any of this history? Does it not know it? Does it really think that this whole war started suddenly on the date that Russia invaded Ukraine—after Kiev increased the attacks on Donbas by a factor of 17, the artillery shelling of the civilian areas of Donbas? It was obviously intended to provoke Russia into this attack in order to try to turn it into a NATO-wide conflict against Russia. But the Russians know their history. Unlike us, they do study history. They know their history. This is a bitter conflict—long, many grudges, much ill feeling in it. But someone has to sit down. In my view, the first step was the step JFK actually took before he was assassinated, when he started to say we should acknowledge how much Russia lost fighting with us in the Second World War—how many men they lost, 27 million, how many people were lost. We should start from saying something like that. There has to be some sort of acknowledgment of the realities of what it is—not this crude, childish reducing of everything, without any context, to a decontextualized world: “Oh, Russia, it just came into Putin’s head that he wanted to be an emperor again, and so he took part of Ukraine.” This is the sort of stuff you would not even get from a seven-year-old child writing an essay at school.”

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

29,409 просмотров • 20 дней назад