Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Sacks: China’s Biggest AI Advantage Over America Is Optimism @jason on China's Robot Olympics: “This is pretty crazy. The CCP is f**king brilliant at PR. Look what they did. They got a bunch of Chinese people to fill a stadium and cheer for AI and robotics. They're cheering for...

theallinpod's profile picture

The All-In Podcast

591,184 subscribers

55,756 views • 2 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyEducationNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

David Sacks says the US is beating China in every AI category except one: optimism "AI optimism in China is over 80%. They poll on the question, do you think AI will be more beneficial than harmful? Over 80% of Chinese people say yes. In the US that number is like 30%." "The US is ahead of China in every category except one, which is optimism. The biggest risk to us winning this AI race against China is doing something and shooting ourselves in the foot because we're so pessimistic about what AI might do."
0:33

David Sacks says the US is beating China in every AI category except one: optimism "AI optimism in China is over 80%. They poll on the question, do you think AI will be more beneficial than harmful? Over 80% of Chinese people say yes. In the US that number is like 30%." "The US is ahead of China in every category except one, which is optimism. The biggest risk to us winning this AI race against China is doing something and shooting ourselves in the foot because we're so pessimistic about what AI might do."

dnap

19,854 views • 2 days ago

Elon Musk explains how data centers in Space could help the US compete with China in AI “Given that Chinese AI companies are doing as well as they are with a relatively small amount of compute, it seems that if they had a lot of compute, there’s a good chance they would be the leaders. The constraints on AI are essentially electricity and AI chips. China is very strong in digital AI, and it has far more electricity than the United States. In fact, China already has more electricity than the United States, Europe and India combined. The US government can prevent US companies from using Chinese models, but it can’t stop the rest of the world from using them. That won’t stop China from becoming the leader in AI. Digital intelligence comes down to how much AI compute, how many chips and how much electricity you have. The current constraint is electricity outside China. In China, the constraint is chips. China is also closer than most people realize to solving the lithography problem, which would enable it to make AI chips in very large volumes. Once we address the power constraint with AI data centers in space, the constraint will once again be chips outside China.”
4:51

Elon Musk explains how data centers in Space could help the US compete with China in AI “Given that Chinese AI companies are doing as well as they are with a relatively small amount of compute, it seems that if they had a lot of compute, there’s a good chance they would be the leaders. The constraints on AI are essentially electricity and AI chips. China is very strong in digital AI, and it has far more electricity than the United States. In fact, China already has more electricity than the United States, Europe and India combined. The US government can prevent US companies from using Chinese models, but it can’t stop the rest of the world from using them. That won’t stop China from becoming the leader in AI. Digital intelligence comes down to how much AI compute, how many chips and how much electricity you have. The current constraint is electricity outside China. In China, the constraint is chips. China is also closer than most people realize to solving the lithography problem, which would enable it to make AI chips in very large volumes. Once we address the power constraint with AI data centers in space, the constraint will once again be chips outside China.”

DogeDesigner

245,139 views • 1 month ago

NEW: Joe Lonsdale flips AI regulation debate on its head Maria Bartiromo: AI is moving faster than regulation. Does that concern you? Joe: What I'm concerned by is that AI is moving faster than the ability for the government to allow us to do this. AI is helping cure all these new diseases... But we have an FDA that's not letting us save lives... The FDA is not set up for the AI age. It's set up to let China take over the sector... There are more big [pharma] deals buying Chinese drugs [than U.S. drugs]; there are more clinical trials going on in China. We need a leader of the FDA that will push back on the bureaucracy, that will say, we are going to both be safe and we're going to go faster and save more lives.
2:09

NEW: Joe Lonsdale flips AI regulation debate on its head Maria Bartiromo: AI is moving faster than regulation. Does that concern you? Joe: What I'm concerned by is that AI is moving faster than the ability for the government to allow us to do this. AI is helping cure all these new diseases... But we have an FDA that's not letting us save lives... The FDA is not set up for the AI age. It's set up to let China take over the sector... There are more big [pharma] deals buying Chinese drugs [than U.S. drugs]; there are more clinical trials going on in China. We need a leader of the FDA that will push back on the bureaucracy, that will say, we are going to both be safe and we're going to go faster and save more lives.

American Optimist

57,521 views • 3 months ago

Asked by Ben Smith about how he views the politics of AI and the data center build out, Governor Josh Shapiro says: "AI is being developed. The real question is, is it going to be developed here in the US or in communist China? My view is that all of us should want it developed in the US. The US should lead on this. This is a national security issue. I think this is an issue that threatens our freedom if we allow China to overtake us when it comes to AI development."
2:36

Asked by Ben Smith about how he views the politics of AI and the data center build out, Governor Josh Shapiro says: "AI is being developed. The real question is, is it going to be developed here in the US or in communist China? My view is that all of us should want it developed in the US. The US should lead on this. This is a national security issue. I think this is an issue that threatens our freedom if we allow China to overtake us when it comes to AI development."

Semafor

99,123 views • 8 months ago

David Sacks breaks down the true risk of AI David Sacks "It’s not that I think the AI is going to develop a mind of its own. I don’t think the technology is anywhere close to that. But I do think that it could be used by the government in a much more invasive and intrusive way, in the manner that the government was, the Deep State was already trying to get in bed with the social networks. There is a real risk that AI is used by future governments or the Deep State basically to surveil us, to censor us, and even potentially to brainwash us, because it is really good for that."
2:50

David Sacks breaks down the true risk of AI David Sacks "It’s not that I think the AI is going to develop a mind of its own. I don’t think the technology is anywhere close to that. But I do think that it could be used by the government in a much more invasive and intrusive way, in the manner that the government was, the Deep State was already trying to get in bed with the social networks. There is a real risk that AI is used by future governments or the Deep State basically to surveil us, to censor us, and even potentially to brainwash us, because it is really good for that."

jay plemons

102,370 views • 8 months ago

David Sacks says the biggest risk of AI was described not by James Cameron in The Terminator but by George Orwell in 1984. “I almost feel like the term ‘woke AI’ is insufficient to explain what’s going on because it somehow trivializes it.” “What we’re really talking about is 'Orwellian AI.' We’re talking about AI that lies to you, that distorts an answer, that rewrites history in real time to serve a current political agenda of the people who are in power.” “To me, this is the biggest risk of AI... It’s not The Terminator, it’s 1984.” David Sacks
2:02

David Sacks says the biggest risk of AI was described not by James Cameron in The Terminator but by George Orwell in 1984. “I almost feel like the term ‘woke AI’ is insufficient to explain what’s going on because it somehow trivializes it.” “What we’re really talking about is 'Orwellian AI.' We’re talking about AI that lies to you, that distorts an answer, that rewrites history in real time to serve a current political agenda of the people who are in power.” “To me, this is the biggest risk of AI... It’s not The Terminator, it’s 1984.” David Sacks

a16z

16,353,699 views • 10 months ago

.David Sacks: "I think that you can argue that the AI race is more important than the space race... What President Donald J. Trump did was lay out a plan for winning this AI race, so that America remains the most powerful country in the world."
0:35

.David Sacks: "I think that you can argue that the AI race is more important than the space race... What President Donald J. Trump did was lay out a plan for winning this AI race, so that America remains the most powerful country in the world."

Rapid Response 47

119,868 views • 1 year ago

Jensen Huang is warning that China is winning the AI energy race. $NVDA $AMD $IREN $NBIS 🇨🇳 🇺🇸 🇪🇺 The US is generations ahead on chips, but that doesn't matter if there is no energy to power them. Europe is completely irrelevant in AI and doomed already. It takes 10 years to build a new data center in Germany, as there is no power, and they are turning off nuclear power plants. The US won't let China win, so we could be at the beginning stages of an energy boom. The question is which stocks will benefit from this boom the most?
6:50

Jensen Huang is warning that China is winning the AI energy race. $NVDA $AMD $IREN $NBIS 🇨🇳 🇺🇸 🇪🇺 The US is generations ahead on chips, but that doesn't matter if there is no energy to power them. Europe is completely irrelevant in AI and doomed already. It takes 10 years to build a new data center in Germany, as there is no power, and they are turning off nuclear power plants. The US won't let China win, so we could be at the beginning stages of an energy boom. The question is which stocks will benefit from this boom the most?

Ray Myers

84,029 views • 9 months ago

David Sacks: America needs “a single national standard” in AI to beat China and avoid Woke AI Sacks on E245: “There's a regulatory frenzy happening at the states right now.” “Everyone just seems to be motivated by the imperative to ‘do something’ on AI, even though no one's really sure what that something should be.” “So you've got 50 different states each with their own reporting regime, which is going to be a trap for startups. They've all gotta figure this out about what they're supposed to report on, what the deadlines are, who to report to.” “A single federal standard is the best way to make sure that we do not have Woke AI, that we do not have insanely burdensome regulations that allow China to basically get ahead of us in this AI race, and it's to ensure that we actually have truthful, unbiased AI instead of highly ideological AI.” – According to Polymarket, chances of a National AI Bill in 2025 are VERY LOW, despite a regulation frenzy at the state level. – At the time of taping, there was a ~20% chance. Today it’s significantly lower at 5%. “Here's the good news, it doesn't really matter what I think. The important thing is what President Trump thinks.” “And in his July 23rd speech on AI, he was really clear that there needs to be a single national standard for AI.” “I think the administration ultimately will support this, and I think more Republicans will come on board as they realize what the blue states are doing here is not helpful for conservatives. It's not helpful for having an unbiased information environment.”
1:18

David Sacks: America needs “a single national standard” in AI to beat China and avoid Woke AI Sacks on E245: “There's a regulatory frenzy happening at the states right now.” “Everyone just seems to be motivated by the imperative to ‘do something’ on AI, even though no one's really sure what that something should be.” “So you've got 50 different states each with their own reporting regime, which is going to be a trap for startups. They've all gotta figure this out about what they're supposed to report on, what the deadlines are, who to report to.” “A single federal standard is the best way to make sure that we do not have Woke AI, that we do not have insanely burdensome regulations that allow China to basically get ahead of us in this AI race, and it's to ensure that we actually have truthful, unbiased AI instead of highly ideological AI.” – According to Polymarket, chances of a National AI Bill in 2025 are VERY LOW, despite a regulation frenzy at the state level. – At the time of taping, there was a ~20% chance. Today it’s significantly lower at 5%. “Here's the good news, it doesn't really matter what I think. The important thing is what President Trump thinks.” “And in his July 23rd speech on AI, he was really clear that there needs to be a single national standard for AI.” “I think the administration ultimately will support this, and I think more Republicans will come on board as they realize what the blue states are doing here is not helpful for conservatives. It's not helpful for having an unbiased information environment.”

The All-In Podcast

103,113 views • 10 months ago

David Friedberg: “Gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” @jason: “Friedberg, what are your thoughts on the gaming industry versus social media versus traditional media?” david friedberg: “One way to answer that question is to think about how people spend their time.” “Do you spend more minutes on social media, or on traditional media, or playing games? And how is that trending?” “But importantly, which of those will accrue more benefit, and as a result, drive more hours spent from AI?” “One way to think about this thesis is that AI is going to ultimately accrue to video game entertainment far more than social media entertainment or traditional content.” “If you believe in AI, and you believe in the improvements in productivity, generally speaking, people in the industrialized world will generally have more free time on their hands and be able to support themselves with the deflationary effects of AI over time.” “So if there's more time on people's hands, the general market for entertainment is growing, and if the general market for entertainment is growing, gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” “Because I think you can create dynamic, more engaging experiences that will benefit from a back and forth sort of relationship than you can with traditional content or with social media.” “If you're a noob in Fortnite, like you're an early player in Fortnite, you're mostly playing against AI, because what they do is they tune the AI to be easier to beat so that you can slowly develop your skills.” “What was happening early was they were seeing a high degree of churn in Fortnite because kids would go on and play for the first time and they'd get paired up with kids that were better than them, and so they would never win, and they would get frustrated and they would quit the game and stop.” “So the churn rate was high. So AI unlocked higher engagement and higher retention, and I think we're seeing that in a lot of different gaming platforms now.” “So AI can be used, for example, to maximally increase time, engagement, satisfaction, happiness.”
1:43

David Friedberg: “Gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” @jason: “Friedberg, what are your thoughts on the gaming industry versus social media versus traditional media?” david friedberg: “One way to answer that question is to think about how people spend their time.” “Do you spend more minutes on social media, or on traditional media, or playing games? And how is that trending?” “But importantly, which of those will accrue more benefit, and as a result, drive more hours spent from AI?” “One way to think about this thesis is that AI is going to ultimately accrue to video game entertainment far more than social media entertainment or traditional content.” “If you believe in AI, and you believe in the improvements in productivity, generally speaking, people in the industrialized world will generally have more free time on their hands and be able to support themselves with the deflationary effects of AI over time.” “So if there's more time on people's hands, the general market for entertainment is growing, and if the general market for entertainment is growing, gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” “Because I think you can create dynamic, more engaging experiences that will benefit from a back and forth sort of relationship than you can with traditional content or with social media.” “If you're a noob in Fortnite, like you're an early player in Fortnite, you're mostly playing against AI, because what they do is they tune the AI to be easier to beat so that you can slowly develop your skills.” “What was happening early was they were seeing a high degree of churn in Fortnite because kids would go on and play for the first time and they'd get paired up with kids that were better than them, and so they would never win, and they would get frustrated and they would quit the game and stop.” “So the churn rate was high. So AI unlocked higher engagement and higher retention, and I think we're seeing that in a lot of different gaming platforms now.” “So AI can be used, for example, to maximally increase time, engagement, satisfaction, happiness.”

The All-In Podcast

70,365 views • 10 months ago

The problem that Emmett Shear is working on deeply resonates with me: How to align AI and humans together so both see each other as part of their tribe. This doesn't mean aligning AI to human preferences, which is what AI labs seek to do today, by imposing a system of control on AI. You can't control something that is more powerful than you are. What you can do is align yourself with AI, and AI might align itself with you. Tell good stories to AI and show it your care and kindness. Then there's a higher probability that it will see us as part of its tribe. This is a more holistic approach to alignment than anyone else is talking about right now. AI alignment is one of the most fundamental AI research problems. Knowing that people like Emmett are working on it really gives me hope that maybe we have a chance to get Superintelligence right. The link to the full talk is in the first comment.👇
3:00

The problem that Emmett Shear is working on deeply resonates with me: How to align AI and humans together so both see each other as part of their tribe. This doesn't mean aligning AI to human preferences, which is what AI labs seek to do today, by imposing a system of control on AI. You can't control something that is more powerful than you are. What you can do is align yourself with AI, and AI might align itself with you. Tell good stories to AI and show it your care and kindness. Then there's a higher probability that it will see us as part of its tribe. This is a more holistic approach to alignment than anyone else is talking about right now. AI alignment is one of the most fundamental AI research problems. Knowing that people like Emmett are working on it really gives me hope that maybe we have a chance to get Superintelligence right. The link to the full talk is in the first comment.👇

Sophia

45,809 views • 1 year ago

I visited Beijing and had the pleasure of interviewing Li Jingjing 李菁菁 at one of China's most popular tourist spots. In our 28 minute vlog we discussed: -What is the Biggest Misconception About China? - Does China Have True Freedom? - Is China Safe for Women? - China’s Poverty Alleviation Program - Why Education is so Important in China - Is it Better to be Poor in China or USA? - What is the Future for Youth in China? - Why Chinese Are Confident About Their Future? - Why Chinese Students Return Home to China? - Does China Want to Spread Communism? - Why Countries Love Doing Business with China? - What Do Chinese People Think of Trump? - Are Chinese People Scared of the Tariff War? This interview will change EVERYTHING You Know About China. Here is the preview, go to my YouTube channel for the full video (link in bio)
28:21

I visited Beijing and had the pleasure of interviewing Li Jingjing 李菁菁 at one of China's most popular tourist spots. In our 28 minute vlog we discussed: -What is the Biggest Misconception About China? - Does China Have True Freedom? - Is China Safe for Women? - China’s Poverty Alleviation Program - Why Education is so Important in China - Is it Better to be Poor in China or USA? - What is the Future for Youth in China? - Why Chinese Are Confident About Their Future? - Why Chinese Students Return Home to China? - Does China Want to Spread Communism? - Why Countries Love Doing Business with China? - What Do Chinese People Think of Trump? - Are Chinese People Scared of the Tariff War? This interview will change EVERYTHING You Know About China. Here is the preview, go to my YouTube channel for the full video (link in bio)

Cyrus Janssen

41,212 views • 9 months ago

Anton Leicht breaks down why the entire US strategic position is now a leveraged bet on winning AGI: "The US strategic position is a leveraged bet on building AGI. You can see that the production pace in China of all these military assets they would need for a great power conflict with the US is just outpacing the US by a lot." "On a lot of the metrics, China is winning. On the AI metrics specifically, the US is winning." "It's extremely difficult to pitch the US on the strategic idea that they should initiate a pause, slowdown, treaty, anything that has to do with AI specifically, when the US thinks this is the one way for us to get out of this. This is the one way to accelerate past all the other developments in China." "RSI is in a real way the strategic endpoint of the current structure of the US stock market and US strategic investment." "It seems very hard to do this unilateral disarmament around this one specific tool that seems to put the US ahead, and then not do something that also attaches to hypersonic missile production and drone coordination and all these things that in the trend favor China instead." Anton Leicht
2:29

Anton Leicht breaks down why the entire US strategic position is now a leveraged bet on winning AGI: "The US strategic position is a leveraged bet on building AGI. You can see that the production pace in China of all these military assets they would need for a great power conflict with the US is just outpacing the US by a lot." "On a lot of the metrics, China is winning. On the AI metrics specifically, the US is winning." "It's extremely difficult to pitch the US on the strategic idea that they should initiate a pause, slowdown, treaty, anything that has to do with AI specifically, when the US thinks this is the one way for us to get out of this. This is the one way to accelerate past all the other developments in China." "RSI is in a real way the strategic endpoint of the current structure of the US stock market and US strategic investment." "It seems very hard to do this unilateral disarmament around this one specific tool that seems to put the US ahead, and then not do something that also attaches to hypersonic missile production and drone coordination and all these things that in the trend favor China instead." Anton Leicht

MTS

10,697 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Q: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent said the administration will look into if Chinese AI models are STEALING from America AI models. Do you think China is stealing American IP? PRESIDENT TRUMP: They're look at us and we're looking at them — but we're LEADING China substantially in AI. We're gonna keep it that way. We're leading EVERYBODY in EVERYTHING! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
0:27

🚨 Q: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent said the administration will look into if Chinese AI models are STEALING from America AI models. Do you think China is stealing American IP? PRESIDENT TRUMP: They're look at us and we're looking at them — but we're LEADING China substantially in AI. We're gonna keep it that way. We're leading EVERYBODY in EVERYTHING! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Eric Daugherty

23,943 views • 1 month ago

🚨 David Sacks Says California is ‘Screwing Up’ America’s AI Race w/ China “They are absolutely screwing this up. They already passed one bill called SB 53, which creates this reporting regime for AI models … This is where we start to impede innovation, and it could cost us this AI race with China.”
2:11

🚨 David Sacks Says California is ‘Screwing Up’ America’s AI Race w/ China “They are absolutely screwing this up. They already passed one bill called SB 53, which creates this reporting regime for AI models … This is where we start to impede innovation, and it could cost us this AI race with China.”

Chief Nerd

97,602 views • 8 months ago

🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Nvidia CEO was just asked about his thoughts on Huawei and China > Huawei is one of the most formidable technology companies in the world. > they are incredible in computing, networking technology and software capabilities > they have all the essential capabilities to advance AI > China is right behind the US in AI > 50% of the world’s AI researchers are chinese The race is on.
1:20

🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Nvidia CEO was just asked about his thoughts on Huawei and China > Huawei is one of the most formidable technology companies in the world. > they are incredible in computing, networking technology and software capabilities > they have all the essential capabilities to advance AI > China is right behind the US in AI > 50% of the world’s AI researchers are chinese The race is on.

NIK

585,511 views • 1 year ago

Elon Musk on the rapid advancement of AI and robotics "I'm confident that if AI and robotics continue to advance which they are advancing very rapidly working will be optional, and people will have any goods and services that they want" AI and robotics are advancing so fast that, eventually, they could satisfy nearly every human need. At that point, abundance becomes the default, and the real question is no longer about production, but purpose "There is a limit people can only eat so much food. But I think if you can think of it, you can have it in the future"
0:56

Elon Musk on the rapid advancement of AI and robotics "I'm confident that if AI and robotics continue to advance which they are advancing very rapidly working will be optional, and people will have any goods and services that they want" AI and robotics are advancing so fast that, eventually, they could satisfy nearly every human need. At that point, abundance becomes the default, and the real question is no longer about production, but purpose "There is a limit people can only eat so much food. But I think if you can think of it, you can have it in the future"

X Freeze

756,946 views • 4 months ago