Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Sakharov theorized that gravity came from the quantum vacuum fluctuations based on Feynman's Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) Nobel prize in 1965. Eric W. Davis says, "we already know and a lot of other physicists know that Einstein proved that gravity is not a fundamental force of nature. It emerges from...

99,080 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Dr. James Joyce
Dr. James Joycevor 1 Jahr

No one in the mainstream world of physics since Feynman has been at Feynman’s level. They have spun this way and that based upon his work, but I do not think they REALLY understood his work. Wheeler did, but that’s about it🤷🏽‍♂️

Profilbild von Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbesvor 1 Jahr

Feynman was a legend. I barely learned about him in school.

Profilbild von ELECTRIC PROPULSIVE SPACECRAFT SYSTEMS
ELECTRIC PROPULSIVE SPACECRAFT SYSTEMSvor 1 Jahr

Sakarov bottoms for Lev Landau ! Lev Landau is the greatest Physics and Instructor of Empirical Mathematical Methodology in history so far.

Profilbild von Pasi Suominen🐭
Pasi Suominen🐭vor 1 Jahr

Should we look at everything in means of fluids? What is aether? Is it the fifth element?

Profilbild von Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbesvor 1 Jahr

Aether is the ZPE which is a superfluid medium permeating all of spacetime. Basically the old Aether upgraded to fit better with current understanding.

Profilbild von Judge Dreddful
Judge Dreddfulvor 1 Jahr

If gravity is bent spacetime and electromagnetism flattens spacetime, then electromagnetism is anti-gravity.

Profilbild von JamesOf The PalmerDivide
JamesOf The PalmerDividevor 1 Jahr

It is an Electric Universe

Profilbild von Renasci
Renascivor 1 Jahr

We need a Salvatore Pais + Eric Davis interview. Stat. @TOEwithCurt 🙏

Profilbild von ⁱⁿᵗʳᵉˢᵖᵉᵏᵗ
ⁱⁿᵗʳᵉˢᵖᵉᵏᵗvor 1 Jahr

More to it than just gravity.

Profilbild von Isaac Lopez
Isaac Lopezvor 1 Jahr

Thanks for sharing but I have no idea what that means. 😅

Profilbild von Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbesvor 1 Jahr

Means I was right. Eric Davis is saying it's all about zero point energy.

Ähnliche Videos

A common misconception in physics is that gravity must be negligible at the quantum scale because its measured strength appears weak compared to electromagnetism and the strong nuclear force. However, this perception arises from considering gravity only in its weak field limit. Obviously, it will appear weak under such conditions, but the situation changes when we consider regions of high mass-energy density. For example, when examining strong gravitational fields near black holes, the force becomes immensely powerful. With this in mind, lets re-examine unification and gravity at the quantum scale: Following our holographic mass solution, elementary particles like protons are found to be microscopic Schwarzschild black holes and their mass-energy density is sufficient to create a gravitational curvature equivalent to the strong nuclear force. The vacuum energy density of space provides enough energy to maintain these structures through Planck-scale dynamics, preventing their rapid evaporation via Hawking radiation, so they are ultra-stable. These discoveries, expounded in our studies like The Origin of Mass and the Nature of Gravity, available to download for free on CERN's Zenodo preprint server-🔗 -demonstrate that what we observe as distinct fundamental forces are in fact manifestations of a unified force operating at different scales, where quantum vacuum fluctuations significantly curve spacetime (the curvature being gravity) with the resulting encapsulation generating screening effects that modulate the apparent strength of gravity from its fundamental high-energy state, which results in nuclear confinement forces, to its familiar weak-field behavior that appears as regular Newtonian gravity.

Nassim Haramein

19,882 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr