Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Sakharov theorized that gravity came from the quantum vacuum fluctuations based on Feynman's Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) Nobel prize in 1965. Eric W. Davis says, "we already know and a lot of other physicists know that Einstein proved that gravity is not a fundamental force of nature. It emerges from...

99,080 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля Dr. James Joyce
Dr. James Joyce1 год назад

No one in the mainstream world of physics since Feynman has been at Feynman’s level. They have spun this way and that based upon his work, but I do not think they REALLY understood his work. Wheeler did, but that’s about it🤷🏽‍♂️

Фото профиля Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbes1 год назад

Feynman was a legend. I barely learned about him in school.

Фото профиля ELECTRIC PROPULSIVE SPACECRAFT SYSTEMS
ELECTRIC PROPULSIVE SPACECRAFT SYSTEMS1 год назад

Sakarov bottoms for Lev Landau ! Lev Landau is the greatest Physics and Instructor of Empirical Mathematical Methodology in history so far.

Фото профиля Pasi Suominen🐭
Pasi Suominen🐭1 год назад

Should we look at everything in means of fluids? What is aether? Is it the fifth element?

Фото профиля Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbes1 год назад

Aether is the ZPE which is a superfluid medium permeating all of spacetime. Basically the old Aether upgraded to fit better with current understanding.

Фото профиля Judge Dreddful
Judge Dreddful1 год назад

If gravity is bent spacetime and electromagnetism flattens spacetime, then electromagnetism is anti-gravity.

Фото профиля JamesOf The PalmerDivide
JamesOf The PalmerDivide1 год назад

It is an Electric Universe

Фото профиля Renasci
Renasci1 год назад

We need a Salvatore Pais + Eric Davis interview. Stat. @TOEwithCurt 🙏

Фото профиля ⁱⁿᵗʳᵉˢᵖᵉᵏᵗ
ⁱⁿᵗʳᵉˢᵖᵉᵏᵗ1 год назад

More to it than just gravity.

Фото профиля Isaac Lopez
Isaac Lopez1 год назад

Thanks for sharing but I have no idea what that means. 😅

Фото профиля Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbes1 год назад

Means I was right. Eric Davis is saying it's all about zero point energy.

Похожие видео

A common misconception in physics is that gravity must be negligible at the quantum scale because its measured strength appears weak compared to electromagnetism and the strong nuclear force. However, this perception arises from considering gravity only in its weak field limit. Obviously, it will appear weak under such conditions, but the situation changes when we consider regions of high mass-energy density. For example, when examining strong gravitational fields near black holes, the force becomes immensely powerful. With this in mind, lets re-examine unification and gravity at the quantum scale: Following our holographic mass solution, elementary particles like protons are found to be microscopic Schwarzschild black holes and their mass-energy density is sufficient to create a gravitational curvature equivalent to the strong nuclear force. The vacuum energy density of space provides enough energy to maintain these structures through Planck-scale dynamics, preventing their rapid evaporation via Hawking radiation, so they are ultra-stable. These discoveries, expounded in our studies like The Origin of Mass and the Nature of Gravity, available to download for free on CERN's Zenodo preprint server-🔗 -demonstrate that what we observe as distinct fundamental forces are in fact manifestations of a unified force operating at different scales, where quantum vacuum fluctuations significantly curve spacetime (the curvature being gravity) with the resulting encapsulation generating screening effects that modulate the apparent strength of gravity from its fundamental high-energy state, which results in nuclear confinement forces, to its familiar weak-field behavior that appears as regular Newtonian gravity.

Nassim Haramein

19,882 просмотров • 1 год назад