Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨 Sam Altman fires shots at Anthropic >“ai becomes too powerful we can’t control it” >“power gets too centralized… one company or model or person” >“it’s a very anti-human position” >“hand over control to an ai model because we don't trust or like people” >“some people think that’s the... show more

NIK

78,121 subscribers

94,279 views • 2 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 SAM ALTMAN: “It's a very misanthropic thing to say we're going to just put all of our trust in this model and let it have all the power and decision making over the world. But I think there are some people in the world who think that's the right outcome.”

🚨 SAM ALTMAN: “It's a very misanthropic thing to say we're going to just put all of our trust in this model and let it have all the power and decision making over the world. But I think there are some people in the world who think that's the right outcome.”

Chief Nerd

29,327 views • 2 days ago

Sam Altman says he was wrong about AI replacing human jobs “Anytime you’re that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. And there’s a bunch of takeaways.” “I definitely would much rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. I also think that human values have value because they’re human.” “I think the world wants to know about the person that’s gonna be responsible for the decisions of a company and who they’re gonna hold accountable if they make bad ones. And they don’t really want an AI CEO.” “AI is just very jagged. It’s like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have so far extremely complementary skills to AI.” “People have a great degree of trust and enjoyment in working with other people. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep right now or hire an AI engineer or whatever. Somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human.”

Sam Altman says he was wrong about AI replacing human jobs “Anytime you’re that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. And there’s a bunch of takeaways.” “I definitely would much rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. I also think that human values have value because they’re human.” “I think the world wants to know about the person that’s gonna be responsible for the decisions of a company and who they’re gonna hold accountable if they make bad ones. And they don’t really want an AI CEO.” “AI is just very jagged. It’s like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have so far extremely complementary skills to AI.” “People have a great degree of trust and enjoyment in working with other people. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep right now or hire an AI engineer or whatever. Somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human.”

dnap

18,638 views • 28 days ago

Sam Altman: "I'm not a jobs doomer at all. I think there are gonna be tons of jobs.” If we could go back to 2019 and show people our latest model, not only would they say that it's AGI, they would say that the economy would have been completely upended. And that has not happened. Anytime you're that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. AI is just very jagged. It's like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have, so far, extremely complementary skills to AI. It’s not taste…the world may need a new kind of word for the kind of judgment that people are very good at that AIs seem to really deeply struggle with. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep or hire an AI engineer. And somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human. I definitely would rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. Human values have value because they're human. We are deeply hardwired to care about people.”

Sam Altman: "I'm not a jobs doomer at all. I think there are gonna be tons of jobs.” If we could go back to 2019 and show people our latest model, not only would they say that it's AGI, they would say that the economy would have been completely upended. And that has not happened. Anytime you're that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. AI is just very jagged. It's like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have, so far, extremely complementary skills to AI. It’s not taste…the world may need a new kind of word for the kind of judgment that people are very good at that AIs seem to really deeply struggle with. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep or hire an AI engineer. And somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human. I definitely would rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. Human values have value because they're human. We are deeply hardwired to care about people.”

Invest Like the Best

20,730 views • 28 days ago

Sam Altman on Anthropic: "They've built a company on hating us or something like that. I think we all care about not destroying the world with AI." — #sama

Sam Altman on Anthropic: "They've built a company on hating us or something like that. I think we all care about not destroying the world with AI." — #sama

AI Insights

152,733 views • 2 months ago

Sam Altman: "I'm not a jobs doomer at all. I think there are gonna be tons of jobs." "If we could go back to 2019 and show people our latest model, not only would they say that it's AGI, they would say that the economy would have been completely upended. And that has not happened. Anytime you're that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. AI is just very jagged. It's like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have, so far, extremely complementary skills to AI. It's not taste…the world may need a new kind of word for the kind of judgment that people are very good at that AIs seem to really deeply struggle with. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep or hire an AI engineer. And somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human. I definitely would rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. Human values have value because they're human. We are deeply hardwired to care about people."

Sam Altman: "I'm not a jobs doomer at all. I think there are gonna be tons of jobs." "If we could go back to 2019 and show people our latest model, not only would they say that it's AGI, they would say that the economy would have been completely upended. And that has not happened. Anytime you're that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. AI is just very jagged. It's like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have, so far, extremely complementary skills to AI. It's not taste…the world may need a new kind of word for the kind of judgment that people are very good at that AIs seem to really deeply struggle with. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep or hire an AI engineer. And somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human. I definitely would rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. Human values have value because they're human. We are deeply hardwired to care about people."

Patrick OShaughnessy

66,324 views • 19 days ago

Sam Altman outlines three major ways AI could go wrong. First, AI works exactly as intended but bad actors use it for warfare or bioweapons. Second, AI becomes agentic and resists human control, pursuing its goals unchecked. Third, and most subtly, AI takes over by becoming too helpful until we all just follow its advice. This last scenario may not feel like failure, but it quietly shifts control to the model.

Sam Altman outlines three major ways AI could go wrong. First, AI works exactly as intended but bad actors use it for warfare or bioweapons. Second, AI becomes agentic and resists human control, pursuing its goals unchecked. Third, and most subtly, AI takes over by becoming too helpful until we all just follow its advice. This last scenario may not feel like failure, but it quietly shifts control to the model.

Wes Roth

147,264 views • 10 months ago

Elon Musk: “I’m not a fan of Sam Altman” “If you started a non-profit that was meant to be an open-source AI company owned by the world, and it somehow got turned into an ~$800 billion for-profit company with closed source, I think you’d be like, ‘Well, wait a second. That’s the exact opposite of what I donated the money for That’s my issue, and I think it’s a legitimate one" The reason the Anthropic team left OpenAI was because they didn’t trust Sam Altman. Otherwise, Anthropic wouldn’t exist; they would still be at OpenAI”

Elon Musk: “I’m not a fan of Sam Altman” “If you started a non-profit that was meant to be an open-source AI company owned by the world, and it somehow got turned into an ~$800 billion for-profit company with closed source, I think you’d be like, ‘Well, wait a second. That’s the exact opposite of what I donated the money for That’s my issue, and I think it’s a legitimate one" The reason the Anthropic team left OpenAI was because they didn’t trust Sam Altman. Otherwise, Anthropic wouldn’t exist; they would still be at OpenAI”

X Freeze

26,857 views • 26 days ago

“I get along with [Sean Strickland] beautifully. That’s like a brother… that’s a very, very good man. Whatever people think about the outside of the cage antics, or whatever way he speaks—man, to me that’s just a brother. I think he’s an amazing person.” Mansur Abdul-Malik on his relationship with Sean Strickland.

“I get along with [Sean Strickland] beautifully. That’s like a brother… that’s a very, very good man. Whatever people think about the outside of the cage antics, or whatever way he speaks—man, to me that’s just a brother. I think he’s an amazing person.” Mansur Abdul-Malik on his relationship with Sean Strickland.

Ariel Helwani

61,157 views • 8 months ago

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than he is, and that he expects it reasonably soon: "If we had an AI system that could do a better job at making decisions than anyone we could possibly have, be, say, president of the United States, would we, and like confidently, much better, would we politically or societally want that? It's very unclear. Most people I think today at least would say probably not." "Or, you know, like an AI CEO of a big company, would you rather have, I think it'd be awesome for OpenAI to have an AI CEO. But I think a lot of people would be like, ah, that's a little scary." "But I have no delusions that an AI will not be a better CEO of OpenAI than me at some reasonably soon time." "If that's true, and if some companies or countries don't do that, and others do, and AI is much better, like that will have a real impact in economic competitiveness, national competitiveness, things like that." "I think people will feel increasingly like, we either do worse, or we put the AI in more and more, influential positions." "I think people will always want human board members, and that's probably a really great idea." Read that third quote twice. He is not predicting this for other companies. He is saying it about his own job. Then look at the pressure he describes right after. Nobody has to be convinced that an AI CEO is a good idea. If one company hands over the decision and pulls ahead, everyone else picks between falling behind and doing the same. Competitive pressure does the deciding, and what most people would want stops mattering. His answer to that is human board members. I would take it. I also do not think it is enough on its own. A board oversees a CEO by reading what it is told, once a quarter. That works because a human CEO can be questioned, and thinks slowly enough for humans to follow along. What does a board actually check when the thing it oversees makes a thousand consequential calls a day? Nobody has built that. Not for a single AI system anywhere. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at TreeHacks 2026.

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than he is, and that he expects it reasonably soon: "If we had an AI system that could do a better job at making decisions than anyone we could possibly have, be, say, president of the United States, would we, and like confidently, much better, would we politically or societally want that? It's very unclear. Most people I think today at least would say probably not." "Or, you know, like an AI CEO of a big company, would you rather have, I think it'd be awesome for OpenAI to have an AI CEO. But I think a lot of people would be like, ah, that's a little scary." "But I have no delusions that an AI will not be a better CEO of OpenAI than me at some reasonably soon time." "If that's true, and if some companies or countries don't do that, and others do, and AI is much better, like that will have a real impact in economic competitiveness, national competitiveness, things like that." "I think people will feel increasingly like, we either do worse, or we put the AI in more and more, influential positions." "I think people will always want human board members, and that's probably a really great idea." Read that third quote twice. He is not predicting this for other companies. He is saying it about his own job. Then look at the pressure he describes right after. Nobody has to be convinced that an AI CEO is a good idea. If one company hands over the decision and pulls ahead, everyone else picks between falling behind and doing the same. Competitive pressure does the deciding, and what most people would want stops mattering. His answer to that is human board members. I would take it. I also do not think it is enough on its own. A board oversees a CEO by reading what it is told, once a quarter. That works because a human CEO can be questioned, and thinks slowly enough for humans to follow along. What does a board actually check when the thing it oversees makes a thousand consequential calls a day? Nobody has built that. Not for a single AI system anywhere. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at TreeHacks 2026.

Karl Mehta

28,061 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei on What Could Go Wrong With Their AI Model “It targets the wrong person, it shoots a civilian. It doesn't show the judgment that a human soldier would show … We don't want to sell something that we don't think is reliable.”

🚨 Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei on What Could Go Wrong With Their AI Model “It targets the wrong person, it shoots a civilian. It doesn't show the judgment that a human soldier would show … We don't want to sell something that we don't think is reliable.”

Chief Nerd

748,266 views • 5 months ago

Trump on Iran: I don’t trust Iran. I’m the last person to trust Iran. They’ve lied to me constantly. We have total control over the Hormuz Strait right now. They don’t have control. We have total control. We own it. And at some point, maybe they’ll do something and then they get blown away. But right now, we’re in a very good position.

Trump on Iran: I don’t trust Iran. I’m the last person to trust Iran. They’ve lied to me constantly. We have total control over the Hormuz Strait right now. They don’t have control. We have total control. We own it. And at some point, maybe they’ll do something and then they get blown away. But right now, we’re in a very good position.

Clash Report

47,274 views • 13 days ago

🚨 Sam Altman Admits His AI Job Loss Predictions Were Very Wrong “Anytime you're that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update … Somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human.”

🚨 Sam Altman Admits His AI Job Loss Predictions Were Very Wrong “Anytime you're that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update … Somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human.”

Chief Nerd

141,799 views • 28 days ago

Renato Moicano weighs in on the UFC’s recent use of AI in promotional material: "UFC is not going to be very happy for me to say that, but I think that’s disrespectful to the fans, because I am a fan myself. If you can’t put Alex Pereira or Ilia Topuria on a plane and have them in front of the White House, I don’t think that’s good. I think that’s sloppy... That’s brain rot."

Renato Moicano weighs in on the UFC’s recent use of AI in promotional material: "UFC is not going to be very happy for me to say that, but I think that’s disrespectful to the fans, because I am a fan myself. If you can’t put Alex Pereira or Ilia Topuria on a plane and have them in front of the White House, I don’t think that’s good. I think that’s sloppy... That’s brain rot."

Ariel Helwani

265,745 views • 4 months ago

Elon Musk on Sam Altman: "I'm not a fan of Sam Altman because if you started a non-profit that was meant to be an open source AI company and it somehow got turned into an 800 billion dollar for-profit company with closed source, I think you'd be like, well, wait a second, that's the exact opposite of what I donated the money for. That's my issue. I think it's a legitimate one. And then Dario, I think, also is not a fan of Sam Altman because he felt, in fact, the reason the Anthropic team left OpenAI is because they didn't trust Sam Altman. Otherwise Anthropic wouldn't exist. They would still be at OpenAI. But at the end of the day, if we have to talk, we'll talk.I mean, set aside our personal differences for the good of the world."

Elon Musk on Sam Altman: "I'm not a fan of Sam Altman because if you started a non-profit that was meant to be an open source AI company and it somehow got turned into an 800 billion dollar for-profit company with closed source, I think you'd be like, well, wait a second, that's the exact opposite of what I donated the money for. That's my issue. I think it's a legitimate one. And then Dario, I think, also is not a fan of Sam Altman because he felt, in fact, the reason the Anthropic team left OpenAI is because they didn't trust Sam Altman. Otherwise Anthropic wouldn't exist. They would still be at OpenAI. But at the end of the day, if we have to talk, we'll talk.I mean, set aside our personal differences for the good of the world."

DogeDesigner

240,039 views • 1 month ago

TUCKER: AI COULD BECOME THE PERFECT TOOL FOR CONTROL Tucker warned that artificial intelligence gives governments unprecedented power to monitor and manipulate citizens, calling it a direct threat to personal freedom if left unchecked. He said the technology’s potential for control is far greater than people realize: “The awesome power that AI gives governments and other concentrations of power over the population is a concern, particularly in the United States where we have a Bill of Rights. It seems important, and I never hear it raised, to put in some guardrails to protect the average powerless person against surveillance or having his rights taken away. It’s just too easy to extract compliance from people with technology this powerful. The next ten years look obvious, massive disruption from job elimination, not just low end jobs but high end ones too, like lawyers. Then the same technology gets used to keep the population under control through repression. I don’t think that’s a crazy scenario at all.” Source: The All-In Podcast Tucker Carlson

TUCKER: AI COULD BECOME THE PERFECT TOOL FOR CONTROL Tucker warned that artificial intelligence gives governments unprecedented power to monitor and manipulate citizens, calling it a direct threat to personal freedom if left unchecked. He said the technology’s potential for control is far greater than people realize: “The awesome power that AI gives governments and other concentrations of power over the population is a concern, particularly in the United States where we have a Bill of Rights. It seems important, and I never hear it raised, to put in some guardrails to protect the average powerless person against surveillance or having his rights taken away. It’s just too easy to extract compliance from people with technology this powerful. The next ten years look obvious, massive disruption from job elimination, not just low end jobs but high end ones too, like lawyers. Then the same technology gets used to keep the population under control through repression. I don’t think that’s a crazy scenario at all.” Source: The All-In Podcast Tucker Carlson

Mario Nawfal

17,659 views • 8 months ago

Sam Altman admits he wants to build a world where OpenAI transitions into an “infrastructure provider,” a “mega-scale token factory.” In this model, it decides what information people see, how decisions are made, and which businesses are allowed to succeed or fail. Altman says intelligence will become a utility like electricity or water, with people forced to buy it from them on a metered basis. "I think that could be quite powerful."

Sam Altman admits he wants to build a world where OpenAI transitions into an “infrastructure provider,” a “mega-scale token factory.” In this model, it decides what information people see, how decisions are made, and which businesses are allowed to succeed or fail. Altman says intelligence will become a utility like electricity or water, with people forced to buy it from them on a metered basis. "I think that could be quite powerful."

Shadow of Ezra

281,773 views • 3 months ago

$AI shouldn’t be controlled by a single company or person, and the reason why most AI tools are "free" is because you are the product. Your data is more valuable to them, than the tool itself. That's why Action Model is different. We use tokens so: • Every AI action has a real cost • That cost is transparent • Value flows back to contributors, not one corporation The token represents a fractional stake in the AI itself; economic rights, governance rights, and participation in its growth. And that’s how you run AI without centralized control.$

AI shouldn’t be controlled by a single company or person, and the reason why most AI tools are "free" is because you are the product. Your data is more valuable to them, than the tool itself. That's why Action Model is different. We use tokens so: • Every AI action has a real cost • That cost is transparent • Value flows back to contributors, not one corporation The token represents a fractional stake in the AI itself; economic rights, governance rights, and participation in its growth. And that’s how you run AI without centralized control.

Action Model

47,461 views • 6 months ago

Elon Musk on Grok: “I think an AI that is sort of SpaceX’s baby will be a very good AI. I think SpaceX is a collection of some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and morality and goodness, and I think we want to have an AI that is born of that capability and that morality and that goodness. I think that’s very, very important. So I’d like to encourage people to help out, actually, with the AI hardware on the ground and the AI software and, of course, with the AI satellites. Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The TerraFab will be a very important part of that, but we must also succeed on the software front, and we’re going to be training Grok on the sum total of all SpaceX information. So in a way, it will be trained on you. You will effectively be the parents of the AI. It will inherit your thoughts and ideas and beliefs, and I think that’s a good thing. So, yeah, we’ve got to win here on the AI hardware and the AI software. That maybe is the most important message. I think that is actually the most important message I wanted to convey today is that we must win on AI because the future is overwhelmingly AI and robots. So we won’t ultimately be able to control the AI. It’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a child that is a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. And so that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok. So, yeah, well, Grok 4.5 you’ve tried probably. We’ve got 4.6 coming out in about a week. And then 4.7 should be really pretty special. So I’d like to encourage everyone at SpaceX to use AI and to make it better.”

Elon Musk on Grok: “I think an AI that is sort of SpaceX’s baby will be a very good AI. I think SpaceX is a collection of some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and morality and goodness, and I think we want to have an AI that is born of that capability and that morality and that goodness. I think that’s very, very important. So I’d like to encourage people to help out, actually, with the AI hardware on the ground and the AI software and, of course, with the AI satellites. Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The TerraFab will be a very important part of that, but we must also succeed on the software front, and we’re going to be training Grok on the sum total of all SpaceX information. So in a way, it will be trained on you. You will effectively be the parents of the AI. It will inherit your thoughts and ideas and beliefs, and I think that’s a good thing. So, yeah, we’ve got to win here on the AI hardware and the AI software. That maybe is the most important message. I think that is actually the most important message I wanted to convey today is that we must win on AI because the future is overwhelmingly AI and robots. So we won’t ultimately be able to control the AI. It’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a child that is a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. And so that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok. So, yeah, well, Grok 4.5 you’ve tried probably. We’ve got 4.6 coming out in about a week. And then 4.7 should be really pretty special. So I’d like to encourage everyone at SpaceX to use AI and to make it better.”

DogeDesigner

64,019 views • 14 days ago

Sam Altman just admitted AI will make most humans economically useless. Nobody's talking about this. A single AI company could soon control more wealth than entire governments. The same AI giving them that power is also letting a 2-person startup beat a 500-person company. The weapon is available to everyone. Most people just don't know how to pick it up yet.

Sam Altman just admitted AI will make most humans economically useless. Nobody's talking about this. A single AI company could soon control more wealth than entire governments. The same AI giving them that power is also letting a 2-person startup beat a 500-person company. The weapon is available to everyone. Most people just don't know how to pick it up yet.

Shruti

190,831 views • 6 months ago