Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Sam Altman just admitted AI will make most humans economically useless. Nobody's talking about this. A single AI company could soon control more wealth than entire governments. The same AI giving them that power is also letting a 2-person startup beat a 500-person company. The weapon is available to... show more

Shruti

178,915 subscribers

190,831 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 SAM ALTMAN JUST MADE A MASSIVE BET ON THE FUTURE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY His nuclear startup, $OKLO, will power the massive energy demands of the AI revolution. So, Sam Altman is not only betting on AI... He is betting on what will power it. The chart is also within the most critical zone of this entire year right now. This could be huge.

🚨 SAM ALTMAN JUST MADE A MASSIVE BET ON THE FUTURE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY His nuclear startup, $OKLO, will power the massive energy demands of the AI revolution. So, Sam Altman is not only betting on AI... He is betting on what will power it. The chart is also within the most critical zone of this entire year right now. This could be huge.

Coinvo Trading

18,297 views • 28 days ago

"my kid is never going to grow up smarter than AI...and that'll be natural" OpenAI CEO, Sam Altman: the future generations will grow up in a world where AI is naturally more intelligent than humans it also requires a rethinking of how humans and AI work together

"my kid is never going to grow up smarter than AI...and that'll be natural" OpenAI CEO, Sam Altman: the future generations will grow up in a world where AI is naturally more intelligent than humans it also requires a rethinking of how humans and AI work together

Haider.

108,659 views • 1 year ago

🚨"NEVER TRUST SAM ALTMAN, EVER... HE'S NOT A PERSON, HE'S A BRAND" Mo Gawdat delivers blistering takedown of OpenAI CEO, claiming Altman represents Silicon Valley vapor over substance while comparing OpenAI's profit focus to Google's early mission-driven projects: "Never trust Sam Altman, ever. Sam Altman is not a person. Sam Altman is the creation of a system. California is a place where vapor is worth more than solids. You look at OpenAI's original promise, which was to protect the world from artificial intelligence, to make AI work for humanity, and then you look for actions that support that. And if you don't find any, then it's just a pitch. You could see at OpenAI how all of them, Ilya and Mira, most of the core team left and asked for the company to change its leadership." Mo Gawdat

Mario Nawfal

17,634 views • 8 months ago

Sam Altman says "AGI soon" is too vague for what is really coming A clearer way to say it: AI may soon do more of the world's total thinking than humans That could cause major short-term job disruption if most intellectual work shifts to GPUs "so we need to start designing an economy that works for everyone"

Sam Altman says "AGI soon" is too vague for what is really coming A clearer way to say it: AI may soon do more of the world's total thinking than humans That could cause major short-term job disruption if most intellectual work shifts to GPUs "so we need to start designing an economy that works for everyone"

Haider.

31,953 views • 4 months ago

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than him in the reasonably near future Once that becomes clear, companies and countries will face pressure to give AI more influential roles or fall behind "people will still want humans, but if AI is better, more power will shift to AI"

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than him in the reasonably near future Once that becomes clear, companies and countries will face pressure to give AI more influential roles or fall behind "people will still want humans, but if AI is better, more power will shift to AI"

Haider.

31,627 views • 5 months ago

🚨 Sam Altman fires shots at Anthropic >“ai becomes too powerful we can’t control it” >“power gets too centralized… one company or model or person” >“it’s a very anti-human position” >“hand over control to an ai model because we don't trust or like people” >“some people think that’s the right outcome” >“i think that’s a very misanthropic thing to say”

🚨 Sam Altman fires shots at Anthropic >“ai becomes too powerful we can’t control it” >“power gets too centralized… one company or model or person” >“it’s a very anti-human position” >“hand over control to an ai model because we don't trust or like people” >“some people think that’s the right outcome” >“i think that’s a very misanthropic thing to say”

NIK

94,279 views • 2 days ago

Sam Altman says true superintelligence already exists, but it's not a single brain It is the collective "scaffolding" of human civilization If AI discovers new physics that humans later use, is that "AI as superintelligence" or just the scaffold getting taller? I don't know

Sam Altman says true superintelligence already exists, but it's not a single brain It is the collective "scaffolding" of human civilization If AI discovers new physics that humans later use, is that "AI as superintelligence" or just the scaffold getting taller? I don't know

Haider.

75,051 views • 9 months ago

$AI shouldn’t be controlled by a single company or person, and the reason why most AI tools are "free" is because you are the product. Your data is more valuable to them, than the tool itself. That's why Action Model is different. We use tokens so: • Every AI action has a real cost • That cost is transparent • Value flows back to contributors, not one corporation The token represents a fractional stake in the AI itself; economic rights, governance rights, and participation in its growth. And that’s how you run AI without centralized control.$

AI shouldn’t be controlled by a single company or person, and the reason why most AI tools are "free" is because you are the product. Your data is more valuable to them, than the tool itself. That's why Action Model is different. We use tokens so: • Every AI action has a real cost • That cost is transparent • Value flows back to contributors, not one corporation The token represents a fractional stake in the AI itself; economic rights, governance rights, and participation in its growth. And that’s how you run AI without centralized control.

Action Model

47,461 views • 6 months ago

AI will enable smaller teams to achieve bigger things. A one-person company can now hit a billion-dollar valuation 💰 I chatted with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman at the Robin Hood x J.P. Morgan Investors Conf a while back + chatted about the immense impact AI holds for startup success ↓

AI will enable smaller teams to achieve bigger things. A one-person company can now hit a billion-dollar valuation 💰 I chatted with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman at the Robin Hood x J.P. Morgan Investors Conf a while back + chatted about the immense impact AI holds for startup success ↓

Alexis Ohanian 🗽

289,266 views • 2 years ago

Sam Altman (Sam Altman): "The most underrated quality is being really determined. This is more important than being smart, having a network or a great idea. So much about being a successful entrepreneur is just not giving up."

Sam Altman (Sam Altman): "The most underrated quality is being really determined. This is more important than being smart, having a network or a great idea. So much about being a successful entrepreneur is just not giving up."

BUILD OR DIE

901,064 views • 2 years ago

Will I be the first one-person billion-dollar company? I don't care. My goal is to be the first one-person company to help a billion people get into the new AI economy. That's Polsia. Fun talking through it with the extremely talented Will Phillips on his behind-the-scenes documentary.

Will I be the first one-person billion-dollar company? I don't care. My goal is to be the first one-person company to help a billion people get into the new AI economy. That's Polsia. Fun talking through it with the extremely talented Will Phillips on his behind-the-scenes documentary.

Ben Cera

79,653 views • 3 months ago

"I don't even know the f***ing product lines. Where is all the revenue coming from?" Sam Altman: "Actually... I think we should be more of a platform company than a product company." *This 2 minute section is astounding because Sam Altman just admitted: 1) AI (LLMs) are a commodity; meaning they're easily substitutable, suffering from extreme boom and bust cycles. 2) OpenAI doesn't have any products, they're relying on users to build them. 3) They want to be a service provider, putting them in direct competition in a space already dominated by Oracle, Amazon, Microsoft and Google. The scary part is Sam doesn't realize he just told the world that the emperor has no clothes.

"I don't even know the f***ing product lines. Where is all the revenue coming from?" Sam Altman: "Actually... I think we should be more of a platform company than a product company." *This 2 minute section is astounding because Sam Altman just admitted: 1) AI (LLMs) are a commodity; meaning they're easily substitutable, suffering from extreme boom and bust cycles. 2) OpenAI doesn't have any products, they're relying on users to build them. 3) They want to be a service provider, putting them in direct competition in a space already dominated by Oracle, Amazon, Microsoft and Google. The scary part is Sam doesn't realize he just told the world that the emperor has no clothes.

Financelot

373,198 views • 1 day ago

Mark Cuban just told every software company on Earth they’re already dead. The people inside them are still building roadmaps. Cuban: “Software is dead because everything’s going to be customized to your unique utilization.” Every SaaS company was built on one bet. Software stays rigid. Humans stay adaptable. You learn the tool. You bend to it. You pay for someone else’s version of your solution. AI just inverted that. The tool bends to you or it dies. Cuban: “33 million companies aren’t going to have AI budgets, aren’t going to have AI experts.” 33 million businesses feel something shifting beneath them. None can name it. The distance between what AI can do and what small companies can access is the most mispriced gap in markets today. Not a technology problem. A translation problem. Cuban: “Learn all you can about AI but learn more on how to implement them in companies.” Everyone is racing to build intelligence. Almost nobody is racing to deploy it where the pain is deepest. The person who walks into a 40-person company and rewires their entire operation captures more value than the team that trained the model. Understanding pain is now worth more than building intelligence. Cuban: “Every single job available for kids coming out of school because every single company needs that.” The most important career of the next decade has no title. No degree path. No university knows it needs to exist yet. It belongs to whoever learns two languages fluently. The language of a business that can’t articulate what’s breaking. And the language of an AI that doesn’t know where to aim. 33 million companies. Zero translators. Whoever arrives first doesn’t enter a market. They create one.

Mark Cuban just told every software company on Earth they’re already dead. The people inside them are still building roadmaps. Cuban: “Software is dead because everything’s going to be customized to your unique utilization.” Every SaaS company was built on one bet. Software stays rigid. Humans stay adaptable. You learn the tool. You bend to it. You pay for someone else’s version of your solution. AI just inverted that. The tool bends to you or it dies. Cuban: “33 million companies aren’t going to have AI budgets, aren’t going to have AI experts.” 33 million businesses feel something shifting beneath them. None can name it. The distance between what AI can do and what small companies can access is the most mispriced gap in markets today. Not a technology problem. A translation problem. Cuban: “Learn all you can about AI but learn more on how to implement them in companies.” Everyone is racing to build intelligence. Almost nobody is racing to deploy it where the pain is deepest. The person who walks into a 40-person company and rewires their entire operation captures more value than the team that trained the model. Understanding pain is now worth more than building intelligence. Cuban: “Every single job available for kids coming out of school because every single company needs that.” The most important career of the next decade has no title. No degree path. No university knows it needs to exist yet. It belongs to whoever learns two languages fluently. The language of a business that can’t articulate what’s breaking. And the language of an AI that doesn’t know where to aim. 33 million companies. Zero translators. Whoever arrives first doesn’t enter a market. They create one.

Dustin

473,525 views • 1 month ago

Everyone's building AI agents for crypto. Almost nobody's talking about the infrastructure problem. AI agents need to move faster than humans. But most blockchains are built for humans. Here's why that's a massive issue (and how Supra fixed it):

Everyone's building AI agents for crypto. Almost nobody's talking about the infrastructure problem. AI agents need to move faster than humans. But most blockchains are built for humans. Here's why that's a massive issue (and how Supra fixed it):

Supra

15,839 views • 7 months ago

Sam Altman says AGI is like a Rorschach test: the way people describe it often reveals more about themselves than about AGI itself "it is a powerful tool, not a self-aware sci-fi creature" Even if an AI ran a company one day, a human would still be giving it the goal to pursue

Sam Altman says AGI is like a Rorschach test: the way people describe it often reveals more about themselves than about AGI itself "it is a powerful tool, not a self-aware sci-fi creature" Even if an AI ran a company one day, a human would still be giving it the goal to pursue

Haider.

51,812 views • 3 months ago

Jensen Huang just said the most dangerous thing about AI that no one is sitting with. Huang: “AI basically does most of our coding. And yet we’re hiring more engineers than ever. We have more challenges than ever. We have bigger dreams than ever.” Every engineer at NVIDIA uses AI. AI writes most of their code. This is the company building the infrastructure behind every major AI system on Earth. Closer to this technology than any organization alive. They’re hiring more people. Not fewer. Every conversation about AI is built around subtraction. Fewer jobs. Fewer workers. Fewer humans in the loop. Jensen just told you the opposite is true. Huang: “Suppose we infused AI into this country, and as a result of that, we are doing things faster than ever before. Our ambition is greater than ever before. Our expectations are greater than ever before. How is that a bad condition for our country?” He’s not defending AI. He’s describing what happens inside the organizations that actually use it. It doesn’t make them leaner. It makes them hungrier. More ambition. More speed. More appetite for problems no one would have touched five years ago. The car didn’t make humans travel less. The internet didn’t make humans communicate less. No tool in human history has ever made humans want less. AI will not be the exception. Huang: “Prior to that, it’s been incredible but not useful. Now it’s useful and incredible.” Six months. That’s how fast AI crossed from impressive demo to daily weapon. The companies that adopted it didn’t shrink. They expanded. Compressed timelines. Started chasing problems they never would have attempted. The companies that ignored it stayed exactly where they were. That gap compounds. Every day a company uses AI to move faster, it learns something the one standing still never will. That knowledge stacks. That speed stacks. That ambition stacks. Jensen isn’t warning about a future where machines take your job. He’s describing a present where the companies using AI are becoming so fast and so hungry that standing still is already fatal. By the time you notice, it’s over. You were never going to be replaced by AI. You were going to be erased by someone it made hungrier than you.

Jensen Huang just said the most dangerous thing about AI that no one is sitting with. Huang: “AI basically does most of our coding. And yet we’re hiring more engineers than ever. We have more challenges than ever. We have bigger dreams than ever.” Every engineer at NVIDIA uses AI. AI writes most of their code. This is the company building the infrastructure behind every major AI system on Earth. Closer to this technology than any organization alive. They’re hiring more people. Not fewer. Every conversation about AI is built around subtraction. Fewer jobs. Fewer workers. Fewer humans in the loop. Jensen just told you the opposite is true. Huang: “Suppose we infused AI into this country, and as a result of that, we are doing things faster than ever before. Our ambition is greater than ever before. Our expectations are greater than ever before. How is that a bad condition for our country?” He’s not defending AI. He’s describing what happens inside the organizations that actually use it. It doesn’t make them leaner. It makes them hungrier. More ambition. More speed. More appetite for problems no one would have touched five years ago. The car didn’t make humans travel less. The internet didn’t make humans communicate less. No tool in human history has ever made humans want less. AI will not be the exception. Huang: “Prior to that, it’s been incredible but not useful. Now it’s useful and incredible.” Six months. That’s how fast AI crossed from impressive demo to daily weapon. The companies that adopted it didn’t shrink. They expanded. Compressed timelines. Started chasing problems they never would have attempted. The companies that ignored it stayed exactly where they were. That gap compounds. Every day a company uses AI to move faster, it learns something the one standing still never will. That knowledge stacks. That speed stacks. That ambition stacks. Jensen isn’t warning about a future where machines take your job. He’s describing a present where the companies using AI are becoming so fast and so hungry that standing still is already fatal. By the time you notice, it’s over. You were never going to be replaced by AI. You were going to be erased by someone it made hungrier than you.

Dustin

12,200 views • 3 months ago

Q: Why is it easier to start a hard company than an easy company? In the clip below, Sam Altman tells the class at Stanford: “It’s easier to start a hard company than an easy company. Most people—especially young people—want to pick something that doesn’t sound too ambitious. They say to themselves: ‘starting a company sounds really hard. I better pick the easiest possible company.’” But as Sam explains: “Starting a company is always hard and it’s about equally hard no matter what you do. If you start a hard company though and you inspire passionate people—for example, if you are working on general AI or supersonic airplanes or nuclear power—you’ll find a lot more people who are excited about that than another derivative idea.” He elaborates on this idea even further in a blog post from four years ago: “The most precious commodity in the startup ecosystem right now is talented people, and for the most part talented people want to work on something they find meaningful… An easy startup is a headwind; a hard startup is a tailwind. If people care about your success because you seem committed to doing something significant, it’s a background force helping you with hiring, advice, partnerships, fundraising, etc.” He continues: “Let yourself become more ambitious—figure out the most interesting version of where what you’re working on could go. Then talk about that big vision and work relentlessly towards it, but always have a reasonable next step. You don’t want step one to be incorporating the company and step two to be going to Mars. Be willing to make a very long-term commitment to what you’re doing. Most people aren’t, which is part of the reason they pick ‘easy’ startups. In a world of compounding advantages where most people are operating on a 3 year timeframe and you’re operating on a 10 year timeframe, you’ll have a very large edge.”

Q: Why is it easier to start a hard company than an easy company? In the clip below, Sam Altman tells the class at Stanford: “It’s easier to start a hard company than an easy company. Most people—especially young people—want to pick something that doesn’t sound too ambitious. They say to themselves: ‘starting a company sounds really hard. I better pick the easiest possible company.’” But as Sam explains: “Starting a company is always hard and it’s about equally hard no matter what you do. If you start a hard company though and you inspire passionate people—for example, if you are working on general AI or supersonic airplanes or nuclear power—you’ll find a lot more people who are excited about that than another derivative idea.” He elaborates on this idea even further in a blog post from four years ago: “The most precious commodity in the startup ecosystem right now is talented people, and for the most part talented people want to work on something they find meaningful… An easy startup is a headwind; a hard startup is a tailwind. If people care about your success because you seem committed to doing something significant, it’s a background force helping you with hiring, advice, partnerships, fundraising, etc.” He continues: “Let yourself become more ambitious—figure out the most interesting version of where what you’re working on could go. Then talk about that big vision and work relentlessly towards it, but always have a reasonable next step. You don’t want step one to be incorporating the company and step two to be going to Mars. Be willing to make a very long-term commitment to what you’re doing. Most people aren’t, which is part of the reason they pick ‘easy’ startups. In a world of compounding advantages where most people are operating on a 3 year timeframe and you’re operating on a 10 year timeframe, you’ll have a very large edge.”

Michael McGuiness

504,007 views • 2 years ago

People take my videos without giving me credit. So I keep giving them more. Here is Sam Hall who is showing me a new AI-run mobile phone. I think his system is way more interesting than what Sam Altman showed me in a Mexican restaurant years ago here. At the Founders Inc startup festival. Which starts in two hours. I will have a lot more to say about what Sam is building soon.

People take my videos without giving me credit. So I keep giving them more. Here is Sam Hall who is showing me a new AI-run mobile phone. I think his system is way more interesting than what Sam Altman showed me in a Mexican restaurant years ago here. At the Founders Inc startup festival. Which starts in two hours. I will have a lot more to say about what Sam is building soon.

Robert Scoble

38,245 views • 3 months ago

Anthropic CEO: "we got seven more months." the bet was a $1B one-person company by end of 2026. two-person AI companies already crossed $1B, one-person companies are past several hundred million. not everyone can make a $1B company. but a $10K MRR AI agent company is on the table. this guy dropped the exact roadmap. Bookmark this and start this weekend.

Anthropic CEO: "we got seven more months." the bet was a $1B one-person company by end of 2026. two-person AI companies already crossed $1B, one-person companies are past several hundred million. not everyone can make a $1B company. but a $10K MRR AI agent company is on the table. this guy dropped the exact roadmap. Bookmark this and start this weekend.

Rohit

1,031,694 views • 3 months ago