正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Sam Altman getting unusually humble here. He openly admits they messed up writing quality and that GPT-4.5 is still unmatched. The big bet went into raw intelligence, reasoning, coding, engineering. Writing took the hit. The hope now is clear: replicate GPT-4.5 level writing, because great writing equals clear thinking.... show more

VraserX e/acc

21,408 subscribers

25,426 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Sam Altman "I think we just screwed that up." OpenAI has developed coding at the expense of creative writing. GPT-5.x focuses on intelligence, reasoning, & coding, but future versions will improve writing. A model that generates full apps needs good writing, clear communication

Sam Altman "I think we just screwed that up." OpenAI has developed coding at the expense of creative writing. GPT-5.x focuses on intelligence, reasoning, & coding, but future versions will improve writing. A model that generates full apps needs good writing, clear communication

Chubby♨️

52,706 次观看 • 7 个月前

Sam Altman: “Clarity of thinking, speed, and quality of execution are all linked” Sam explains that he uses writing as a tool to think clearly: “I think of writing as externalized thinking. If I have a very hard problem or if I feel a little bit confused about something, I have not found anything better to do than sit down and make myself write it out… it is a super powerful thinking tool.” One reason clear thinking is important, Sam argues, is because it’s crucial for clear communication: “If you know what you’re going to do, and if you’ve figured out how to reduce that to the essence of why it’s a good idea and what the priorities going to be, then communicating that clearly is not so hard. But getting clear about the actual idea is really hard. I think unclear communication is a symptom of unfocused thinking.” Napoleon famously said, “The secret of war lies in the communications.” Sam believes refrains on the importance of clear communication like this are so common because “clarity, speed, and quality of execution are all linked.” Video source: David Perell (2024)

Sam Altman: “Clarity of thinking, speed, and quality of execution are all linked” Sam explains that he uses writing as a tool to think clearly: “I think of writing as externalized thinking. If I have a very hard problem or if I feel a little bit confused about something, I have not found anything better to do than sit down and make myself write it out… it is a super powerful thinking tool.” One reason clear thinking is important, Sam argues, is because it’s crucial for clear communication: “If you know what you’re going to do, and if you’ve figured out how to reduce that to the essence of why it’s a good idea and what the priorities going to be, then communicating that clearly is not so hard. But getting clear about the actual idea is really hard. I think unclear communication is a symptom of unfocused thinking.” Napoleon famously said, “The secret of war lies in the communications.” Sam believes refrains on the importance of clear communication like this are so common because “clarity, speed, and quality of execution are all linked.” Video source: David Perell (2024)

Startup Archive

83,184 次观看 • 11 个月前

Sam Altman: “Clarity of thinking, speed, and quality of execution are all linked” Sam explains that he uses writing as a tool to think clearly: “I think of writing as externalized thinking. If I have a very hard problem or if I feel a little bit confused about something, I have not found anything better to do than sit down and make myself write it out… it is a super powerful thinking tool.” One reason clear thinking is important, Sam argues, is because it’s crucial for clear communication: “If you know what you’re going to do, and if you’ve figured out how to reduce that to the essence of why it’s a good idea and what the priorities going to be, then communicating that clearly is not so hard. But getting clear about the actual idea is really hard. I think unclear communication is a symptom of unfocused thinking.” Napoleon famously said, “The secret of war lies in the communications.” Sam believes refrains on the importance of clear communication like this are so common because “clarity, speed, and quality of execution are all linked.” Source: David Perell (Sep 2024)

Sam Altman: “Clarity of thinking, speed, and quality of execution are all linked” Sam explains that he uses writing as a tool to think clearly: “I think of writing as externalized thinking. If I have a very hard problem or if I feel a little bit confused about something, I have not found anything better to do than sit down and make myself write it out… it is a super powerful thinking tool.” One reason clear thinking is important, Sam argues, is because it’s crucial for clear communication: “If you know what you’re going to do, and if you’ve figured out how to reduce that to the essence of why it’s a good idea and what the priorities going to be, then communicating that clearly is not so hard. But getting clear about the actual idea is really hard. I think unclear communication is a symptom of unfocused thinking.” Napoleon famously said, “The secret of war lies in the communications.” Sam believes refrains on the importance of clear communication like this are so common because “clarity, speed, and quality of execution are all linked.” Source: David Perell (Sep 2024)

Startup Archive

32,381 次观看 • 3 个月前

Trump: The only reason our unemployment tucked up and went up to 4.5%, which it went up to 4.5%, which is quite a low number, but still, it is because we are reducing the government workforce by numbers that have never been seen before

Trump: The only reason our unemployment tucked up and went up to 4.5%, which it went up to 4.5%, which is quite a low number, but still, it is because we are reducing the government workforce by numbers that have never been seen before

Acyn

147,003 次观看 • 8 个月前

Today Sam Asante and I are releasing Typeahead 2.0 on Product Hunt. Sam and I started this company because we think local AI software is going to become a much bigger part of how people use their computers. Typeahead is the first product from that thesis. The first version made the idea clear. AI autocomplete should work in the apps where writing already happens. Since then, we have been shipping toward the product that idea deserves. The app feels faster and more natural. Suggestions are easier to control. The experience is more native to the Mac. It's getting better at staying out of the way until the exact moment it can help. That matters because writing is personal. The best AI writing help keeps you in the sentence. You stay in flow and keep your voice. The machine helps without taking over. Typeahead works across your Mac, runs locally, works offline, and is built to feel like software you own. We’re live on Product Hunt today.

Today Sam Asante and I are releasing Typeahead 2.0 on Product Hunt. Sam and I started this company because we think local AI software is going to become a much bigger part of how people use their computers. Typeahead is the first product from that thesis. The first version made the idea clear. AI autocomplete should work in the apps where writing already happens. Since then, we have been shipping toward the product that idea deserves. The app feels faster and more natural. Suggestions are easier to control. The experience is more native to the Mac. It's getting better at staying out of the way until the exact moment it can help. That matters because writing is personal. The best AI writing help keeps you in the sentence. You stay in flow and keep your voice. The machine helps without taking over. Typeahead works across your Mac, runs locally, works offline, and is built to feel like software you own. We’re live on Product Hunt today.

Hiten Shah

28,113 次观看 • 1 个月前

Sam Altman on GPT 6 • The GDPv eval will shift some of the way we do post training • overall we are keeping the same strategy going into GPT 6 Sam Altman on AGI: Sam Altman about AGI: "we are finally in the moment": "As the closer we get to it, the fuzzier the Agi concept becomes. But the one thing that I care the most about and, to my great surprise, we're finally in the moment; where it's starting to happen is, when it can do novel discovery, when It can expand the total human knowledge base.“ I have seen some examples from credible professors, that novel math problems have been solved. Such as GPT 5 Pro reportedly solving Yu Tsumura’s 554th problem, an IMO level group theory challenge that an August preprint said no LLM had solved, so the new claim is being actively contested. Sébastien Bubeck also said GPT 5 Pro produced a new proof that tightened a bound in smooth convex optimization.

Sam Altman on GPT 6 • The GDPv eval will shift some of the way we do post training • overall we are keeping the same strategy going into GPT 6 Sam Altman on AGI: Sam Altman about AGI: "we are finally in the moment": "As the closer we get to it, the fuzzier the Agi concept becomes. But the one thing that I care the most about and, to my great surprise, we're finally in the moment; where it's starting to happen is, when it can do novel discovery, when It can expand the total human knowledge base.“ I have seen some examples from credible professors, that novel math problems have been solved. Such as GPT 5 Pro reportedly solving Yu Tsumura’s 554th problem, an IMO level group theory challenge that an August preprint said no LLM had solved, so the new claim is being actively contested. Sébastien Bubeck also said GPT 5 Pro produced a new proof that tightened a bound in smooth convex optimization.

Chris

221,718 次观看 • 10 个月前

What if you built a company to maximize deep work? That's what Sam Corcos did. He hasn't regularly checked the news since 2013 and his business is worth $300 million. 12 lessons on writing from the founder and CEO of Levels: 1. The average tech worker can't go more than six minutes without checking Slack. No wonder people struggle to write. 2. Evergreen tip for getting people to actually read your work: add value to the internet. 3. Collaboration is overrated. Smart people thinking deeply about something for a long time, and recording the conclusions via writing, is underrated. 4. Sam did an experiment where he stopped reading the news for a month. He took the time he used to spend reading the news and started reading books instead — he finished eight books that month. 5. Writing solves disagreements. If you don’t pin down your thoughts on paper, you can “discuss” forever without ever reaching clarity. But the conversation becomes much more productive once the goals, methods, and main assumptions are written down. 6. Just about everybody could benefit from more intentional, deep, strategic thought. Writing is how you unlock this mode. 7. Remote work fails without a few great writers on the team. Internal company communication will spiral into a game of telephone without good communicators. 8. Specific feedback is better delivered via writing while general comments are best shared over Loom (because the recipient can feel your vibe.) Pick the right medium; the wrong one will botch your message. 9. A writing culture is protection against the tyranny of the loudest voice. It gives space for quieter people with insight to speak up. 10. You’ll never be able to reflect and write, unless you intentionally carve out the time. “Things” will always turn up. Create non-negotiable writing hours and protect them. 11. Sam does one Think Week every quarter where he disconnects from his work to write deep strategy memos. 12. You need to detach from the hive mind before creative ideas turn up (and it is often via writing that the flimsy premises of the hive mind become obvious.) I've shared the full conversation with Sam Corcos below. This one's a little different from most How I Write episodes because we went so deep on a single topic: business writing. If you'd rather listen on Apple or Spotify, check out the reply tweets.

What if you built a company to maximize deep work? That's what Sam Corcos did. He hasn't regularly checked the news since 2013 and his business is worth $300 million. 12 lessons on writing from the founder and CEO of Levels: 1. The average tech worker can't go more than six minutes without checking Slack. No wonder people struggle to write. 2. Evergreen tip for getting people to actually read your work: add value to the internet. 3. Collaboration is overrated. Smart people thinking deeply about something for a long time, and recording the conclusions via writing, is underrated. 4. Sam did an experiment where he stopped reading the news for a month. He took the time he used to spend reading the news and started reading books instead — he finished eight books that month. 5. Writing solves disagreements. If you don’t pin down your thoughts on paper, you can “discuss” forever without ever reaching clarity. But the conversation becomes much more productive once the goals, methods, and main assumptions are written down. 6. Just about everybody could benefit from more intentional, deep, strategic thought. Writing is how you unlock this mode. 7. Remote work fails without a few great writers on the team. Internal company communication will spiral into a game of telephone without good communicators. 8. Specific feedback is better delivered via writing while general comments are best shared over Loom (because the recipient can feel your vibe.) Pick the right medium; the wrong one will botch your message. 9. A writing culture is protection against the tyranny of the loudest voice. It gives space for quieter people with insight to speak up. 10. You’ll never be able to reflect and write, unless you intentionally carve out the time. “Things” will always turn up. Create non-negotiable writing hours and protect them. 11. Sam does one Think Week every quarter where he disconnects from his work to write deep strategy memos. 12. You need to detach from the hive mind before creative ideas turn up (and it is often via writing that the flimsy premises of the hive mind become obvious.) I've shared the full conversation with Sam Corcos below. This one's a little different from most How I Write episodes because we went so deep on a single topic: business writing. If you'd rather listen on Apple or Spotify, check out the reply tweets.

David Perell

42,993 次观看 • 2 年前

Typing every reply, document, and email is starting to feel outdated. Thinking out loud is simply more natural than forcing ideas through a keyboard. Lately, I've been using Typeless, and the shift is obvious. I speak while ideas are still forming, and they turn into clear emails that sound human, Slack replies that don't need rewriting, clean docs, notes, and fast brain dumps. Even messy thoughts end up as structured outlines. There's no blank page pressure, no fixing commas, no retyping the same sentence over and over. You just talk the way you normally would, and the writing gets cleaned up quietly in the background. It feels less like writing and more like thinking clearly, out loud, without friction. If typing drains your energy or slows your flow, this is one of those small changes that actually makes a big difference. Link here:

Typing every reply, document, and email is starting to feel outdated. Thinking out loud is simply more natural than forcing ideas through a keyboard. Lately, I've been using Typeless, and the shift is obvious. I speak while ideas are still forming, and they turn into clear emails that sound human, Slack replies that don't need rewriting, clean docs, notes, and fast brain dumps. Even messy thoughts end up as structured outlines. There's no blank page pressure, no fixing commas, no retyping the same sentence over and over. You just talk the way you normally would, and the writing gets cleaned up quietly in the background. It feels less like writing and more like thinking clearly, out loud, without friction. If typing drains your energy or slows your flow, this is one of those small changes that actually makes a big difference. Link here:

FELIX

106,721 次观看 • 7 个月前

Sam Altman on his method for clear thinking: "I'm a huge notetaker. I go through one of these notebooks every two or three weeks." Sam has a very specific system for thinking clearly through writing. As he puts it: "You definitely want a spiral notebook because one thing that's important is you can rip pages out frequently. I take a bunch of notes and then I clearly rip them out so I can look at multiple pages at the same time, and I can crumple them up and throw them on the floor when I'm done." On why writing matters, even with AGI: "Writing is a tool for thinking, most importantly, and I don't think that's going anywhere. It's really important that people still learn to write for this reason. In the same way that even if there's going to be less traditional coding jobs, coding is a great way to learn to think too; you should still learn to code." His perfect writing environment? "I used to think like, oh, I got to get in the perfect place, and I got to set a time. Now I will take any 11 minutes uninterrupted that I can get sitting in the back of a car, laying in bed, whatever it is." He continues: “If I had a perfect thing it would be Saturday morning with a cup of coffee and nothing scheduled. But most of it happens in short chunks in the back of a car." On his rhythm for deep work: "I'm in the office kind of non-stop all week. I have no time to think, it's just crazy packed. And then on the weekends, I have long, quiet blocks and I'm not really around people. That cycle is very important to me."

Sam Altman on his method for clear thinking: "I'm a huge notetaker. I go through one of these notebooks every two or three weeks." Sam has a very specific system for thinking clearly through writing. As he puts it: "You definitely want a spiral notebook because one thing that's important is you can rip pages out frequently. I take a bunch of notes and then I clearly rip them out so I can look at multiple pages at the same time, and I can crumple them up and throw them on the floor when I'm done." On why writing matters, even with AGI: "Writing is a tool for thinking, most importantly, and I don't think that's going anywhere. It's really important that people still learn to write for this reason. In the same way that even if there's going to be less traditional coding jobs, coding is a great way to learn to think too; you should still learn to code." His perfect writing environment? "I used to think like, oh, I got to get in the perfect place, and I got to set a time. Now I will take any 11 minutes uninterrupted that I can get sitting in the back of a car, laying in bed, whatever it is." He continues: “If I had a perfect thing it would be Saturday morning with a cup of coffee and nothing scheduled. But most of it happens in short chunks in the back of a car." On his rhythm for deep work: "I'm in the office kind of non-stop all week. I have no time to think, it's just crazy packed. And then on the weekends, I have long, quiet blocks and I'm not really around people. That cycle is very important to me."

Jaynit

640,873 次观看 • 8 个月前

Announcing: Writing Examples Today is launch day! We built this website to celebrate great writing. It’s 100% free. Each article deconstructs a piece of writing from an iconic writer. The goal is to give you X-Ray vision into what makes sentences and paragraphs come alive (so that you can improve at your craft). Every example has an analysis of why the writing works. Analytical often means dry. But instead of going technical, we’ve gone technicolor. There are text-explainers, summary graphics, and videos that come together to make the writing instruction lively and multi-dimensional. It’s a place where you can discover how great writing comes together. Where we lift up the hood and see the mechanics in action. It isn’t about giving you a set of rules to follow. It’s about showing the diversity of ways writers approach their craft, so you can develop your own style. What are some of the articles about? You’ll learn how to describe a party like F. Scott Fitzgerald, how to tell a story like George Orwell, how to write a speech like John F. Kennedy. There are other articles inspired by the likes of John Steinbeck, James Clear, Winston Churchill, Edgar Allen Poe, Charles Dickens, Steven Pressfield, and Jerry Seinfeld. Writing Examples is a crusade against the sterility of contemporary writing. So much of the advice you read says the same thing: “Be direct. Cut the fluff. Get to the point. Stick to short sentences.” And yeah, sure, this advice has merit. It’s useful in certain cases, but the problem is writers take these rules to be universal, which has homogenized writing styles. Even in my own writing, there’ve been so many times where I’ve stripped away my own voice in the name of “correctness.” I regret that. The truth is, there is no one way to write well, just as there is no one way to speak well. The way you speak in a boardroom is different from the way you speak on a first date, which is different from the way you speak with your childhood best friends. Writing is similar. Writing Examples is the opposite of Grammarly. It celebrates the wild, wacky, and the weird because it’s the bedrock of personality. The site’s explicit purpose is to inject some High Noon Chutzpah back into the world of writing. To teach you how to write with distinctly human fingerprints in a world that’s about to be flooded with AI-generated content. Forget playing it safe. That’s the most dangerous thing you can do in a world of instant writing. I want you to write with personality. I want you to play with punctuation. I want you to ditch the corporatized hogwash. I want to expand your sense of what great writing can be. And I want you to have fun doing it. But there’s more to the mission. Writing Examples is a protest against today’s Internet, where people spend the majority of their time reading ad-polluted articles and doom-scrolling the same few social media sites. Remember when we used to surf the Internet? When every site was its own wave to ride? Now, we’re like phone-addicted zombies, we mindlessly scroll Twitter, TikTok, LinkedIn, Facebook, or Instagram until we feel bad about ourselves — only to repeat the cycle a few hours later. Writing Examples is different. Heartfelt writing deserves a heartfelt presentation, so every element of the site has been designed from scratch. Energetically, we wanted to honor the gravitas of classic writing without the sleepiness of a drab old library shelf. We said no to ads. We said no to pop-ups. No hijacking your attention. None of the flat white backgrounds that make the Internet feel so homogenous. And we said no to anything that feels like your 5th-grade English class. Writing Examples isn’t about what’s trending. It’s about learning from the great writers of times past, most of whom you know, many of whom you probably haven’t taken the time to read. The ultimate goal is to make Writing Examples a one-stop shop to learn about any kind of writing you can think of. Now, I dare you to dive into the site and get to work.

Announcing: Writing Examples Today is launch day! We built this website to celebrate great writing. It’s 100% free. Each article deconstructs a piece of writing from an iconic writer. The goal is to give you X-Ray vision into what makes sentences and paragraphs come alive (so that you can improve at your craft). Every example has an analysis of why the writing works. Analytical often means dry. But instead of going technical, we’ve gone technicolor. There are text-explainers, summary graphics, and videos that come together to make the writing instruction lively and multi-dimensional. It’s a place where you can discover how great writing comes together. Where we lift up the hood and see the mechanics in action. It isn’t about giving you a set of rules to follow. It’s about showing the diversity of ways writers approach their craft, so you can develop your own style. What are some of the articles about? You’ll learn how to describe a party like F. Scott Fitzgerald, how to tell a story like George Orwell, how to write a speech like John F. Kennedy. There are other articles inspired by the likes of John Steinbeck, James Clear, Winston Churchill, Edgar Allen Poe, Charles Dickens, Steven Pressfield, and Jerry Seinfeld. Writing Examples is a crusade against the sterility of contemporary writing. So much of the advice you read says the same thing: “Be direct. Cut the fluff. Get to the point. Stick to short sentences.” And yeah, sure, this advice has merit. It’s useful in certain cases, but the problem is writers take these rules to be universal, which has homogenized writing styles. Even in my own writing, there’ve been so many times where I’ve stripped away my own voice in the name of “correctness.” I regret that. The truth is, there is no one way to write well, just as there is no one way to speak well. The way you speak in a boardroom is different from the way you speak on a first date, which is different from the way you speak with your childhood best friends. Writing is similar. Writing Examples is the opposite of Grammarly. It celebrates the wild, wacky, and the weird because it’s the bedrock of personality. The site’s explicit purpose is to inject some High Noon Chutzpah back into the world of writing. To teach you how to write with distinctly human fingerprints in a world that’s about to be flooded with AI-generated content. Forget playing it safe. That’s the most dangerous thing you can do in a world of instant writing. I want you to write with personality. I want you to play with punctuation. I want you to ditch the corporatized hogwash. I want to expand your sense of what great writing can be. And I want you to have fun doing it. But there’s more to the mission. Writing Examples is a protest against today’s Internet, where people spend the majority of their time reading ad-polluted articles and doom-scrolling the same few social media sites. Remember when we used to surf the Internet? When every site was its own wave to ride? Now, we’re like phone-addicted zombies, we mindlessly scroll Twitter, TikTok, LinkedIn, Facebook, or Instagram until we feel bad about ourselves — only to repeat the cycle a few hours later. Writing Examples is different. Heartfelt writing deserves a heartfelt presentation, so every element of the site has been designed from scratch. Energetically, we wanted to honor the gravitas of classic writing without the sleepiness of a drab old library shelf. We said no to ads. We said no to pop-ups. No hijacking your attention. None of the flat white backgrounds that make the Internet feel so homogenous. And we said no to anything that feels like your 5th-grade English class. Writing Examples isn’t about what’s trending. It’s about learning from the great writers of times past, most of whom you know, many of whom you probably haven’t taken the time to read. The ultimate goal is to make Writing Examples a one-stop shop to learn about any kind of writing you can think of. Now, I dare you to dive into the site and get to work.

David Perell

688,452 次观看 • 1 年前

What if writing felt as easy as talking? Typeless (Typeless ) turns your voice into clean, publish-ready text — refining tone, fixing grammar, and shaping rough thoughts into clear writing. I tested it by summarizing a full webpage, drafting an email, and even working inside ChatGPT — all without touching the keyboard. No typing. No rewrites. Just finished work. Originally built for Mac, Typeless is now available on Windows, making hands-free writing accessible to anyone who writes regularly. From emails and blogs to full articles, it works like a quiet co-writer that adapts to how you think. Try it here →

What if writing felt as easy as talking? Typeless (Typeless ) turns your voice into clean, publish-ready text — refining tone, fixing grammar, and shaping rough thoughts into clear writing. I tested it by summarizing a full webpage, drafting an email, and even working inside ChatGPT — all without touching the keyboard. No typing. No rewrites. Just finished work. Originally built for Mac, Typeless is now available on Windows, making hands-free writing accessible to anyone who writes regularly. From emails and blogs to full articles, it works like a quiet co-writer that adapts to how you think. Try it here →

Parul Gautam

24,569 次观看 • 8 个月前

“Our biggest bottleneck is becoming the review of code, rather than the actual writing and generation of code.” Cisco CPO Jeetu Patel says code review is still super important though, because without human taste and judgment, code quickly turns into slop: “Every engineer on that team is now just a spec developer.” “They just build specs. They create markdown files. They give context to the model. They give context to the agent. And then the agent’s writing the code.” “I think, presumably, the review is going to get easier, too.” “You’ll have really crappy software that gets written if people aren’t paying attention to it. It doesn’t obviate the need for having taste, and having judgment, and having instinct, and making sure that you’re thinking about what you’re building."

“Our biggest bottleneck is becoming the review of code, rather than the actual writing and generation of code.” Cisco CPO Jeetu Patel says code review is still super important though, because without human taste and judgment, code quickly turns into slop: “Every engineer on that team is now just a spec developer.” “They just build specs. They create markdown files. They give context to the model. They give context to the agent. And then the agent’s writing the code.” “I think, presumably, the review is going to get easier, too.” “You’ll have really crappy software that gets written if people aren’t paying attention to it. It doesn’t obviate the need for having taste, and having judgment, and having instinct, and making sure that you’re thinking about what you’re building."

TBPN

11,289 次观看 • 6 个月前

Jensen Huang recently said he wants his engineers to spend 0% of their time coding. At first, it sounds absurd — until you realize what he really means. Coding is becoming automated. The new value isn’t in typing instructions for machines… …it’s in teaching machines what’s worth building. Jensen’s message is clear: The future belongs to engineers who understand systems, context, and creativity — not just syntax. As AI takes over execution, human intelligence must rise to orchestration. It’s not about writing code anymore. It’s about writing the future. What do you think — will the best engineers of 2026 still code, or will they design intelligence itself? #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #Coding #Technology #FutureOfWork #Leadership #Innovation #Automation #MachineLearning #AIandHumanity

Jensen Huang recently said he wants his engineers to spend 0% of their time coding. At first, it sounds absurd — until you realize what he really means. Coding is becoming automated. The new value isn’t in typing instructions for machines… …it’s in teaching machines what’s worth building. Jensen’s message is clear: The future belongs to engineers who understand systems, context, and creativity — not just syntax. As AI takes over execution, human intelligence must rise to orchestration. It’s not about writing code anymore. It’s about writing the future. What do you think — will the best engineers of 2026 still code, or will they design intelligence itself? #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #Coding #Technology #FutureOfWork #Leadership #Innovation #Automation #MachineLearning #AIandHumanity

Pascal Bornet

65,503 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 OPENAI PRESIDENT GREG BROCKMAN ON WHEN WE HIT AGI 🚨 Greg Brockman was asked if he agrees with NVIDIA's CEO that AGI is already here. His answer? Not quite yet, as people may know I definitely agree and align with Sam and Demi’s that we are 2 breakthroughs away but we are entering the final stretch. Here is exactly where Greg believes we stand right now: The Percentage: "I'd say I'm basically like 70, 80% there. So I think we're quite close." • The Official Timeline: "I think it's extremely clear that we are going to have AGI within the next couple years." The Concept of "Jagged Intelligence": Brockman admits we are currently sitting in a weird middle ground where AI is "jagged"—it is already operating at an AGI level for highly complex tasks, but still fails at random, basic things. "It is absolutely superhuman at many tasks. When it comes to writing code those kinds of things, the AI can just do it... But there's some very basic tasks that a human can do that our AI still struggle with." How Do We Close the Final 20%? To hit full AGI, the absolute floor of the models' reliability needs to be raised across the board. "The floor of task will just be almost for any intellectual task of how you use your computer, the AI will be able to do that."

🚨 OPENAI PRESIDENT GREG BROCKMAN ON WHEN WE HIT AGI 🚨 Greg Brockman was asked if he agrees with NVIDIA's CEO that AGI is already here. His answer? Not quite yet, as people may know I definitely agree and align with Sam and Demi’s that we are 2 breakthroughs away but we are entering the final stretch. Here is exactly where Greg believes we stand right now: The Percentage: "I'd say I'm basically like 70, 80% there. So I think we're quite close." • The Official Timeline: "I think it's extremely clear that we are going to have AGI within the next couple years." The Concept of "Jagged Intelligence": Brockman admits we are currently sitting in a weird middle ground where AI is "jagged"—it is already operating at an AGI level for highly complex tasks, but still fails at random, basic things. "It is absolutely superhuman at many tasks. When it comes to writing code those kinds of things, the AI can just do it... But there's some very basic tasks that a human can do that our AI still struggle with." How Do We Close the Final 20%? To hit full AGI, the absolute floor of the models' reliability needs to be raised across the board. "The floor of task will just be almost for any intellectual task of how you use your computer, the AI will be able to do that."

Chris

87,339 次观看 • 5 个月前

I asked Sam Altman: “Will AI kill writing?” He said: “I don’t see any evidence whatsoever that AI seems to be killing writing. Let’s say we have a system that can write better than a human. Do you think the most popular novel of 2027 has a human name on it or not? When I finish a great book, the first thing I go do is I want to know more about the writer. I want to know their life story. And I don’t think I’ll ever have that feeling about AI writing. There’s something about reading an incredible book and connecting to a person. Even though you don’t literally know them, you feel like you do and you feel like you have this important shared human experience, and that’s a significant percentage of the enjoyment of a great book to me. I bet we’ll keep doing that.” Sam Altman

I asked Sam Altman: “Will AI kill writing?” He said: “I don’t see any evidence whatsoever that AI seems to be killing writing. Let’s say we have a system that can write better than a human. Do you think the most popular novel of 2027 has a human name on it or not? When I finish a great book, the first thing I go do is I want to know more about the writer. I want to know their life story. And I don’t think I’ll ever have that feeling about AI writing. There’s something about reading an incredible book and connecting to a person. Even though you don’t literally know them, you feel like you do and you feel like you have this important shared human experience, and that’s a significant percentage of the enjoyment of a great book to me. I bet we’ll keep doing that.” Sam Altman

David Perell

276,346 次观看 • 1 年前

The payoff here is that Yaz decides to signal to Karvanista that they need help by writing a message next to the Great Wall of China (so the message can be seen from space…) Then in a scene that feels mostly constructed by ADR, Karvanista says he can’t help. And that’s that!

The payoff here is that Yaz decides to signal to Karvanista that they need help by writing a message next to the Great Wall of China (so the message can be seen from space…) Then in a scene that feels mostly constructed by ADR, Karvanista says he can’t help. And that’s that!

J-Boi

16,676 次观看 • 9 个月前

Your brain doesn't form the thought until you write it down. Nature Reviews Bioengineering published the case for that claim last summer in an editorial titled "Writing is thinking." The cited evidence is a 2024 EEG study at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. 36 students alternated between handwriting and typing the same words. 256-channel sensor array. Cursive on a touchscreen versus keys on a keyboard. Same words both ways. Handwriting produced widespread connectivity across parietal and central brain regions. Typing didn't. The theta and alpha frequency bands the literature ties to memory formation and encoding lit up almost exclusively when the hand was forming the letters. The motor act was producing the cognition. What the editorial extends from that finding is the more uncomfortable claim. Writing a scientific article is the mechanism by which a researcher discovers what their main message actually is. The act of constructing sentences forces the chaotic, non-linear way the mind wanders into a structured, intentional narrative. You sort years of research into a story, and in the sorting, you find out what you believe. Then the line: If writing is thinking, are we not then reading the thoughts of the LLM rather than those of the researchers behind the paper? Nature endorses LLMs for grammar, search, brainstorming, breaking through writer's block. Where the line gets drawn is outsourcing the whole writing process. Because the writing process is the thinking process. Even editing the LLM's draft is harder than writing one from scratch. To restructure someone else's reasoning you have to reconstruct it first, which means doing the cognitive work anyway, with worse leverage and more friction. The time savings on the keyboard turn out to be cognitive savings on the part of the brain you wanted to use. Your first draft was the thinking.

Your brain doesn't form the thought until you write it down. Nature Reviews Bioengineering published the case for that claim last summer in an editorial titled "Writing is thinking." The cited evidence is a 2024 EEG study at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. 36 students alternated between handwriting and typing the same words. 256-channel sensor array. Cursive on a touchscreen versus keys on a keyboard. Same words both ways. Handwriting produced widespread connectivity across parietal and central brain regions. Typing didn't. The theta and alpha frequency bands the literature ties to memory formation and encoding lit up almost exclusively when the hand was forming the letters. The motor act was producing the cognition. What the editorial extends from that finding is the more uncomfortable claim. Writing a scientific article is the mechanism by which a researcher discovers what their main message actually is. The act of constructing sentences forces the chaotic, non-linear way the mind wanders into a structured, intentional narrative. You sort years of research into a story, and in the sorting, you find out what you believe. Then the line: If writing is thinking, are we not then reading the thoughts of the LLM rather than those of the researchers behind the paper? Nature endorses LLMs for grammar, search, brainstorming, breaking through writer's block. Where the line gets drawn is outsourcing the whole writing process. Because the writing process is the thinking process. Even editing the LLM's draft is harder than writing one from scratch. To restructure someone else's reasoning you have to reconstruct it first, which means doing the cognitive work anyway, with worse leverage and more friction. The time savings on the keyboard turn out to be cognitive savings on the part of the brain you wanted to use. Your first draft was the thinking.

Aakash Gupta

249,848 次观看 • 4 个月前

Trump: But I do want to say, and some people say, 'oh, you shouldn't say it. It sounds negative.' I think it sounds positive. The only reason our unemployment ticked up and went up to 4.5%—it went up to 4.5%, which is quite a low number, but still—is because we are reducing the government workforce by numbers that have never been seen before.

Trump: But I do want to say, and some people say, 'oh, you shouldn't say it. It sounds negative.' I think it sounds positive. The only reason our unemployment ticked up and went up to 4.5%—it went up to 4.5%, which is quite a low number, but still—is because we are reducing the government workforce by numbers that have never been seen before.

FactPost

275,115 次观看 • 8 个月前