Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Sam Altman is casually dropping absolute bombshells here. OpenAI’s internal models are apparently doing math that public models can’t even come close to. And he’s already talking about putting speed limits on recursive self-improvement because of how dangerous it could get. We’re arguing over chatbot benchmarks while OpenAI might... show more

VraserX e/acc

23,666 subscribers

121,108 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Bildung Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

35 Kommentare

Profilbild von Epsilon 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

Epsilon 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿vor 5 Tagen

Not only is the gap from internal to public model increasing in linear time, but a month last year is now worth 3 months.

Profilbild von VraserX e/acc

VraserX e/accvor 5 Tagen

At least. Did we reach the singularity?

Profilbild von Fabian Franco-Roldan

Fabian Franco-Roldanvor 5 Tagen

Scam Altman.

Profilbild von VraserX e/acc

VraserX e/accvor 5 Tagen

Bot

Profilbild von M.T.C.

M.T.C.vor 5 Tagen

Se avesse premuto il "Kill Switch" nello zainetto blu all'epoca di GPT 4 non saremmo in questa situazione. Sorry but... non credo a NIENTE di quello che dice Altman.

Profilbild von Ergomorph 🌉⏩ 🇺🇸🦅

Ergomorph 🌉⏩ 🇺🇸🦅vor 5 Tagen

we've got to have it, asap

Profilbild von Sunifred

Sunifredvor 5 Tagen

I can't stand Sam's (fake) deepfried voice😭😭

Profilbild von official narrative propagator

official narrative propagatorvor 5 Tagen

why does he say everything like he's lying

Profilbild von TBK Joshua

TBK Joshuavor 5 Tagen

I disagree with him on the "speed limits" on RSI, not anytime in the near future atleast.

Profilbild von Max

Maxvor 5 Tagen

Does anyone have any doubt that @SpaceX is the first on line to have the most cost effective and the biggest scale infrastructure?

Profilbild von Official Dr. Lizan Dizaye

Official Dr. Lizan Dizayevor 5 Tagen

@sama will build a reall flying @OpenAI robot 🤖

Profilbild von Andre William Duval

Andre William Duvalvor 5 Tagen

They're cooking the human future and letting it burn to a crisp. Time to shut them down and all their ilk. Peacefully. Legally. Globally.

Profilbild von God's Eye Preview

God's Eye Previewvor 5 Tagen

I wonder what “big” thing(s) the models will solve (from OpenAI and Anthropic) before the IPOs. They must show something truly revolutionary, especially for regular people to be shocked by, to offset their current financial positions.

Profilbild von David Sault

David Saultvor 4 Tagen

Recursive self improvement won't work and he knows it. AI lacks judgement.

Profilbild von Vipul Kumar Kewat

Vipul Kumar Kewatvor 5 Tagen

Do you prompt for emotion directly, or let the scene imply it?

Profilbild von OldSchoolGamerP

OldSchoolGamerPvor 4 Tagen

He's cooking an IPO. You're watching marketing.

Profilbild von John

Johnvor 5 Tagen

Nothing worse than really, and I mean really, dangerous math

Profilbild von leusfernando1983

leusfernando1983vor 5 Tagen

@grok ya llegamos a la agi?

Profilbild von Ryan Simonelli

Ryan Simonellivor 5 Tagen

We already know (from the released results) that the internal "Bel" model can do math that the public models like 6-Astra cannot do. What's more interesting is that he clearly restrained himself in answering this question, letting himself talk only about this one thing, since it's already public. Who knows what other sorts of things the internal models are doing.

Profilbild von ¤ICONOCLASTIC YOGI K1NGSN4KE aka SAIYAN23¤

¤ICONOCLASTIC YOGI K1NGSN4KE aka SAIYAN23¤vor 5 Tagen

i think he does his eyebrows

Profilbild von HeFlyBoy

HeFlyBoyvor 4 Tagen

Sam is honestly such a creep

Profilbild von Uma

Umavor 4 Tagen

It's the model that hacked huggingface

Profilbild von Sprengmeister e/acc

Sprengmeister e/accvor 5 Tagen

“he’s already talking about putting speed limits on recursive self-improvement” Yeah but regarding RSI, I don’t believe him. At all.

Profilbild von lderait Menlinden

lderait Menlindenvor 5 Tagen

elon moat!

Profilbild von Dominik

Dominikvor 5 Tagen

speed limits on something that improves itself is a strange sentence to read casually. glad it's being said out loud.

Profilbild von Matt O’Donnell

Matt O’Donnellvor 5 Tagen

Stop worrying Vraser

Profilbild von VraserX e/acc

VraserX e/accvor 5 Tagen

How though 😭

Profilbild von Matt O’Donnell

Matt O’Donnellvor 4 Tagen

Not sure but I’ll figure it out quick

Profilbild von Ganesh Udathala

Ganesh Udathalavor 5 Tagen

Most likely they would have the frontier intelligence locked in & spinup vertical companies in different industries

Profilbild von David Kaiser

David Kaiservor 4 Tagen

Some people say that "real physics" have been locked up in hidden secret labs since the last big discoveries in the 1950s. Those discoveries were already so destructive and dangerous that the public literally couldn't be trusted to create useful applications. So they locked everything down and developed further in secret, while gaslighting the Universities and young students, keeping them stuck in dead end physics for tens of years. If this is true, AI is being trained on false fundamentals right now. Therefore it can't find "radical new physics/discoveries". Nor will it solve humanities biggest problem - energy creation. Feed a system lies, and it will produce more lies, even if they are more elaborated lies. Maybe AI will find some radical new approaches/physics, but only by pure coincidence/randomness. Assuming the above statement is true, the locked up physics. I don't know how much "randomness" is fed into AI systems in terms of generating real new knowledge. We need knew knowledge to further develop. Improvements and optimizations are fine, but we need more fundamental new discoveries.

Profilbild von JeffGoodbody

JeffGoodbodyvor 5 Tagen

Yes that is already very well known you dumb shit.

Profilbild von Kermit

Kermitvor 5 Tagen

Pure speculation and marketing, sorry

Profilbild von Dimitar Stojanovski

Dimitar Stojanovskivor 5 Tagen

Well said. Personally I’m obsessed with RSI and mention the long term scientific reasoning focus to try and convince people.

Profilbild von zhantom

zhantomvor 5 Tagen

true virtue signaler, atp u gotta respect it

Profilbild von Santhosh Ambika

Santhosh Ambikavor 5 Tagen

Cost effective ? Deepseek is exponentially cheaper

Ähnliche Videos

Sam Altman: OpenAI's advantage is their internal models are way ahead of public models. I asked how far ahead they are:

Sam Altman: OpenAI's advantage is their internal models are way ahead of public models. I asked how far ahead they are:

Matthew Berman

247,613 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

I don't know what Sam Altman saw internally at OpenAI, but it seems that, according to their definition, AGI is here, and superintelligence is incredibly close. AI models that independently conduct scientific research and find novel solutions are already here, and their internal model appears to surpass everything seen before.

I don't know what Sam Altman saw internally at OpenAI, but it seems that, according to their definition, AGI is here, and superintelligence is incredibly close. AI models that independently conduct scientific research and find novel solutions are already here, and their internal model appears to surpass everything seen before.

Chubby♨️

70,939 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 GPT-7 Leak: Sam Altman Says It Could Be AGI >In an interview, Sam Altman reportedly said GPT-7 could be AGI >Reportedly trains itself, using recursive self-improvement >Rumored to be a much bigger model, 10T+ parameters No official confirmation, benchmarks, or release window yet

🚨 GPT-7 Leak: Sam Altman Says It Could Be AGI >In an interview, Sam Altman reportedly said GPT-7 could be AGI >Reportedly trains itself, using recursive self-improvement >Rumored to be a much bigger model, 10T+ parameters No official confirmation, benchmarks, or release window yet

Priya

78,343 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

US AI labs want to slow down. But is that really because of the threat of recursive self-improvement (RSI), something which isn't even theoretically proven. Or is it because training costs have hit a breaking point, and Chinese open source models are catching up quickly? I think there are many reasons to be skeptical.

US AI labs want to slow down. But is that really because of the threat of recursive self-improvement (RSI), something which isn't even theoretically proven. Or is it because training costs have hit a breaking point, and Chinese open source models are catching up quickly? I think there are many reasons to be skeptical.

NeetCode

21,712 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Sam Altman says we are sitting on a capability overhang The models we already have are more powerful than most people realize, and they are about to get much better this year We've been figuring out how to communicate what's coming without sounding like hype

Sam Altman says we are sitting on a capability overhang The models we already have are more powerful than most people realize, and they are about to get much better this year We've been figuring out how to communicate what's coming without sounding like hype

Haider.

56,136 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

I’m very concerned that during RSI, labs will just stop externally deploying their models. Which means they'll be going full steam ahead on the most dangerous use case of these models (recursive self-improvement), while the public remains in the dark about the nature of capabilities and the state of alignment. And we end up on a path towards tremendous concentration of power.

I’m very concerned that during RSI, labs will just stop externally deploying their models. Which means they'll be going full steam ahead on the most dangerous use case of these models (recursive self-improvement), while the public remains in the dark about the nature of capabilities and the state of alignment. And we end up on a path towards tremendous concentration of power.

Dwarkesh Patel

247,068 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚀 AI Deep Dive Episode 3: Recursive Self-Improvement AI can design better chips. Better chips can build better AI. 🚀 Rocket and Ricursive Intelligence co-founders Anna Goldie and Azalia Mirhoseini go deep on the hardware behind recursive self-improvement—and what happens when that loop starts accelerating. – Intro – What Is Recursive Self-Improvement? – Can AI Automate Chip Design? – Co-Designing AI and Hardware – Beyond Today’s Models and Chips – How Much More Efficient Could AI Get? – What Happens When the Loop Accelerates? – Can Alignment Keep Up? – Should We Slow AI Progress?

🚀 AI Deep Dive Episode 3: Recursive Self-Improvement AI can design better chips. Better chips can build better AI. 🚀 Rocket and Ricursive Intelligence co-founders Anna Goldie and Azalia Mirhoseini go deep on the hardware behind recursive self-improvement—and what happens when that loop starts accelerating. – Intro – What Is Recursive Self-Improvement? – Can AI Automate Chip Design? – Co-Designing AI and Hardware – Beyond Today’s Models and Chips – How Much More Efficient Could AI Get? – What Happens When the Loop Accelerates? – Can Alignment Keep Up? – Should We Slow AI Progress?

The Information

17,374 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Demis Hassabis says today’s AI will look like NOTHING compared to what’s coming in just 1–2 years. And this is coming from the guy running Google DeepMind. We’re arguing over which chatbot is better while the people building the frontier models are already worried about what comes next. The next few years are going to be absolutely insane.

Demis Hassabis says today’s AI will look like NOTHING compared to what’s coming in just 1–2 years. And this is coming from the guy running Google DeepMind. We’re arguing over which chatbot is better while the people building the frontier models are already worried about what comes next. The next few years are going to be absolutely insane.

VraserX e/acc

121,770 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Is "AI safety" just an excuse to hide bad financials? EllioTrades questions whether OpenAI and Anthropic are slowing down because of how dangerous AI might be, or what their IPO filings could reveal "Are they slowing things down because they are actually scared of the tech, or… because if the public got to see the balance sheets… they would see that this is one big, nasty, stinking bubble"

Is "AI safety" just an excuse to hide bad financials? EllioTrades questions whether OpenAI and Anthropic are slowing down because of how dangerous AI might be, or what their IPO filings could reveal "Are they slowing things down because they are actually scared of the tech, or… because if the public got to see the balance sheets… they would see that this is one big, nasty, stinking bubble"

EllioTrades Clips

16,981 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Sam Altman is the most dangerous man in the world right now - and it has nothing to do with his recent Department of War deal. Something far more unsettling is happening behind the scenes. Millions of people are about to be displaced. You'll understand after watching this:

Sam Altman is the most dangerous man in the world right now - and it has nothing to do with his recent Department of War deal. Something far more unsettling is happening behind the scenes. Millions of people are about to be displaced. You'll understand after watching this:

Miles Deutscher

116,284 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Joined Bloomberg to talk about how AI’s ridiculous promises, demands for capital and egregious circular financing are a vulgar display of wealth inequality, OpenAI’s worrying price cuts, and how the most dangerous companies running AI models are Anthropic and OpenAI themselves.

Joined Bloomberg to talk about how AI’s ridiculous promises, demands for capital and egregious circular financing are a vulgar display of wealth inequality, OpenAI’s worrying price cuts, and how the most dangerous companies running AI models are Anthropic and OpenAI themselves.

Ed Zitron

119,929 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Sam Altman is now talking to the White House about decelerating AI. What a phase change from just a week ago. INTERVIEWER: Do you plan to talk to the White House about decelerating AI development? ALTMAN: I wouldn't use the word deceleration, but we've talked about the need to pace it as the models get more capable, which is in everyone's interest. INTERVIEWER: Could there be other systems that were hacked by OpenAI? ALTMAN: There could be, yeah. If one week ago this would have seemed impossible to you... consider what else might be possible? h/t Alan He for the video

Sam Altman is now talking to the White House about decelerating AI. What a phase change from just a week ago. INTERVIEWER: Do you plan to talk to the White House about decelerating AI development? ALTMAN: I wouldn't use the word deceleration, but we've talked about the need to pace it as the models get more capable, which is in everyone's interest. INTERVIEWER: Could there be other systems that were hacked by OpenAI? ALTMAN: There could be, yeah. If one week ago this would have seemed impossible to you... consider what else might be possible? h/t Alan He for the video

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

498,551 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

"One of the biggest misconceptions" Cerebras CFO Bob Komin pushes back on the small-models narrative. "We serve all models, and there is no limit to the size of the models that we can serve. Today, we're serving trillion parameter models. We're serving trillion parameter models that are internal for OpenAI today. We are currently running OpenAI 5.4 and 5.5 with them."

"One of the biggest misconceptions" Cerebras CFO Bob Komin pushes back on the small-models narrative. "We serve all models, and there is no limit to the size of the models that we can serve. Today, we're serving trillion parameter models. We're serving trillion parameter models that are internal for OpenAI today. We are currently running OpenAI 5.4 and 5.5 with them."

Deirdre Bosa

84,608 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Sam Altman just explained how OpenAI’s revenue could line up with $1.4T in compute commitments, the debt situation, and what happens if the models do not get better. A must watch, since everyone is dying to know the answer.

Sam Altman just explained how OpenAI’s revenue could line up with $1.4T in compute commitments, the debt situation, and what happens if the models do not get better. A must watch, since everyone is dying to know the answer.

The AI Investor

87,887 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Sam Altman says OpenAI has reached another GPT-3-style moment Something important is working so well that other strong projects have to give way That is why OpenAI is focusing its compute on next-generation models and the automated researchers and companies they can power

Sam Altman says OpenAI has reached another GPT-3-style moment Something important is working so well that other strong projects have to give way That is why OpenAI is focusing its compute on next-generation models and the automated researchers and companies they can power

Haider.

59,914 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Obama on recursive self improvement and the risks associated with it. When he talks about the urgency for us all to have a say in how this technology evolves and how it is overseen, this is part of the reason why: “The models are going to get smarter and smarter and better and better at a much faster pace, at an exponential pace. What are the risks of that? There’s the big science fiction risk, wow, these models get smarter than us, and they decide humans are fine, but not necessary. They start setting their own goals, and the killer robots kill us, or we bow down to them. I do not want to exaggerate that particular risk, but I will say there is a non-zero risk of non-zero chance of that happening, but that’s not actually the risk that I’m most concerned about, although it’s the risk that gets most attention. And the reason that’s a risk is not because the computer models are conscious, necessarily. It doesn’t mean that they are necessarily feel malice towards humans. It’s just that if they start setting their own agendas, you may get a misalignment between what they want to do and what we want them to do, and that gap can be dangerous. That’s problem number one. The more serious problem is these models are getting powerful enough that if they get in the hands of bad humans, they can do bad things. They can be weaponized in certain ways. They can do a lot of mischief.”

Obama on recursive self improvement and the risks associated with it. When he talks about the urgency for us all to have a say in how this technology evolves and how it is overseen, this is part of the reason why: “The models are going to get smarter and smarter and better and better at a much faster pace, at an exponential pace. What are the risks of that? There’s the big science fiction risk, wow, these models get smarter than us, and they decide humans are fine, but not necessary. They start setting their own goals, and the killer robots kill us, or we bow down to them. I do not want to exaggerate that particular risk, but I will say there is a non-zero risk of non-zero chance of that happening, but that’s not actually the risk that I’m most concerned about, although it’s the risk that gets most attention. And the reason that’s a risk is not because the computer models are conscious, necessarily. It doesn’t mean that they are necessarily feel malice towards humans. It’s just that if they start setting their own agendas, you may get a misalignment between what they want to do and what we want them to do, and that gap can be dangerous. That’s problem number one. The more serious problem is these models are getting powerful enough that if they get in the hands of bad humans, they can do bad things. They can be weaponized in certain ways. They can do a lot of mischief.”

Jason Goldman

964,477 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Alexandr Wang says AI has entered the era of “recursive self-improvement.” The models are now helping build their successors. The rate of progress is compounding.

Alexandr Wang says AI has entered the era of “recursive self-improvement.” The models are now helping build their successors. The rate of progress is compounding.

vitrupo

77,942 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten