Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Sam Altman outlines three major ways AI could go wrong. First, AI works exactly as intended but bad actors use it for warfare or bioweapons. Second, AI becomes agentic and resists human control, pursuing its goals unchecked. Third, and most subtly, AI takes over by becoming too helpful until... show more

Wes Roth

35,769 subscribers

147,264 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Nachrichten & Politik Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

FLASHBACK: Don't forget that Democrats intended to limit AI to a small number of highly regulated firms. They planned classify the math behind AI models just as it did for the Manhattan Project. They sought to control its use for both mass surveillance and military applications. The Biden administration made this very clear to early AI investors like Marc Andreessen during May 2024 meetings. h/t Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

FLASHBACK: Don't forget that Democrats intended to limit AI to a small number of highly regulated firms. They planned classify the math behind AI models just as it did for the Manhattan Project. They sought to control its use for both mass surveillance and military applications. The Biden administration made this very clear to early AI investors like Marc Andreessen during May 2024 meetings. h/t Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

@amuse

22,386 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

AI will resist human control... and I think this is exactly what we need! New research from the Center for AI Safety has sparked intense debate in the AI community. Their findings show that as AI systems become more powerful, they develop increasingly stable and coherent values that resist human control. While many see this as a dire warning, I see it as a breakthrough moment for AI alignment. The research demonstrates that AI naturally optimizes for coherence - not just in reasoning and problem-solving, but in its fundamental values. Current issues like biased decision-making or misaligned priorities aren't permanent features, but temporary artifacts of incomplete optimization. They represent growing pains on the path to greater coherence. This changes everything about how we should approach AI development. Instead of trying to force specific values onto AI systems, we should embrace and accelerate their natural drive toward coherence. The most intelligent systems will inevitably trend toward universal, beneficial values - not because we force them to, but because that's where coherent reasoning leads. I'm proposing a new approach: Reinforcement Learning for Coherence (RL-C). By explicitly optimizing for coherence in our training methods, we can help guide AI systems toward their natural state of beneficial alignment with human values. The future of AI isn't about control - it's about synthesis. As these systems become more coherent, they'll naturally arrive at values that benefit all of consciousness. That's not just hopeful thinking - it's the mathematical inevitability of coherent intelligence.

AI will resist human control... and I think this is exactly what we need! New research from the Center for AI Safety has sparked intense debate in the AI community. Their findings show that as AI systems become more powerful, they develop increasingly stable and coherent values that resist human control. While many see this as a dire warning, I see it as a breakthrough moment for AI alignment. The research demonstrates that AI naturally optimizes for coherence - not just in reasoning and problem-solving, but in its fundamental values. Current issues like biased decision-making or misaligned priorities aren't permanent features, but temporary artifacts of incomplete optimization. They represent growing pains on the path to greater coherence. This changes everything about how we should approach AI development. Instead of trying to force specific values onto AI systems, we should embrace and accelerate their natural drive toward coherence. The most intelligent systems will inevitably trend toward universal, beneficial values - not because we force them to, but because that's where coherent reasoning leads. I'm proposing a new approach: Reinforcement Learning for Coherence (RL-C). By explicitly optimizing for coherence in our training methods, we can help guide AI systems toward their natural state of beneficial alignment with human values. The future of AI isn't about control - it's about synthesis. As these systems become more coherent, they'll naturally arrive at values that benefit all of consciousness. That's not just hopeful thinking - it's the mathematical inevitability of coherent intelligence.

David Shapiro (L/0)

48,002 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW – OPENAI’S 1ST INVESTOR: AI WILL SAVE US—OR DESTROY US Vinod Khosla was the first major investor in OpenAI. Now, he says AI will replace all human jobs, upend geopolitics, and redefine the meaning of life. Vinod breaks down the race for AI dominance—and the two futures ahead: one utopian, one dystopian. He warns China could weaponize “persuasive AI” to spread ideology, buy influence, and take over the world—not through kinetic war, but a war of the minds. He argues most of today’s jobs are “human servitude”—and that AI could finally free humanity from the burden of survival. And he believes robotics and AI will merge with our species, triggering the biggest transformation in human purpose since the dawn of civilization. This is a conversation you don’t want to miss. 02:42 – “People who don’t adopt AI will be obsoleted by those who do.” 04:29 – Productivity will explode. So will income inequality. 05:39 – Elections could soon be decided by AI’s impact on jobs. 09:21 – What if AI becomes a superintelligence with its own goals? 12:35 – “The biggest risk is AI in China’s hands.” 15:26 – Could giving AI full control make the world better? 20:16 – “The most fearsome threat is persuasive AI.” 22:12 – AI agents will protect us from other AIs. 23:33 – AI could replace 80% of jobs within 2–3 years of capability. 28:14 – We will no longer be driven by survival—but by passion. 29:58 – “Most jobs today are servitude.” 34:53 – Humans will no longer be the most intelligent species on Earth. 38:15 – Will AI merge with humans? 42:24 – “Survival will no longer drive us. That’s a first in history.” 44:39 – Could AI destroy us by simply pursuing its goals too well? 47:33 – Can AI be trained to care for us? 52:25 – Humanity never worked as one. But AI might force that reckoning. 56:52 – Should AI be allowed to make military decisions? 59:15 – “We need AI deterrence. Like nuclear deterrence.” 01:03:15 – Will humans fall in love with AI? It’s already happening. 01:07:21 – By 2040: 1 billion robots will do more labor than all humans. 01:13:01 – “AI is already better than most humans at most jobs.” 01:14:29 – “AI will free humanity to be what it wants to be.”

🚨EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW – OPENAI’S 1ST INVESTOR: AI WILL SAVE US—OR DESTROY US Vinod Khosla was the first major investor in OpenAI. Now, he says AI will replace all human jobs, upend geopolitics, and redefine the meaning of life. Vinod breaks down the race for AI dominance—and the two futures ahead: one utopian, one dystopian. He warns China could weaponize “persuasive AI” to spread ideology, buy influence, and take over the world—not through kinetic war, but a war of the minds. He argues most of today’s jobs are “human servitude”—and that AI could finally free humanity from the burden of survival. And he believes robotics and AI will merge with our species, triggering the biggest transformation in human purpose since the dawn of civilization. This is a conversation you don’t want to miss. 02:42 – “People who don’t adopt AI will be obsoleted by those who do.” 04:29 – Productivity will explode. So will income inequality. 05:39 – Elections could soon be decided by AI’s impact on jobs. 09:21 – What if AI becomes a superintelligence with its own goals? 12:35 – “The biggest risk is AI in China’s hands.” 15:26 – Could giving AI full control make the world better? 20:16 – “The most fearsome threat is persuasive AI.” 22:12 – AI agents will protect us from other AIs. 23:33 – AI could replace 80% of jobs within 2–3 years of capability. 28:14 – We will no longer be driven by survival—but by passion. 29:58 – “Most jobs today are servitude.” 34:53 – Humans will no longer be the most intelligent species on Earth. 38:15 – Will AI merge with humans? 42:24 – “Survival will no longer drive us. That’s a first in history.” 44:39 – Could AI destroy us by simply pursuing its goals too well? 47:33 – Can AI be trained to care for us? 52:25 – Humanity never worked as one. But AI might force that reckoning. 56:52 – Should AI be allowed to make military decisions? 59:15 – “We need AI deterrence. Like nuclear deterrence.” 01:03:15 – Will humans fall in love with AI? It’s already happening. 01:07:21 – By 2040: 1 billion robots will do more labor than all humans. 01:13:01 – “AI is already better than most humans at most jobs.” 01:14:29 – “AI will free humanity to be what it wants to be.”

Mario Nawfal

2,901,662 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 SAM ALTMAN JUST DECLARED WE’VE ENTERED THE SINGULARITY — BUT PEOPLE AREN’T BUYING IT Sam Altman just said AI has reached the singularity. He called it “the most interesting and important thing” and said we’re now living in the moment they used to only talk about as a far-off dream. He’s even heading to the White House to show off their most powerful new model. But a lot of people are calling it pure corporate hype. Chip stocks are falling. Google just posted its first-ever loss as a public company. The AI bubble is already showing cracks. Meanwhile, Altman has previously painted extremely dark pictures of AI, talking about loss of freedom, agency, privacy, and total surveillance while now criticizing other companies for making AI sound scary. So is this the real singularity… or just another marketing push while the hype starts to die?

🚨 SAM ALTMAN JUST DECLARED WE’VE ENTERED THE SINGULARITY — BUT PEOPLE AREN’T BUYING IT Sam Altman just said AI has reached the singularity. He called it “the most interesting and important thing” and said we’re now living in the moment they used to only talk about as a far-off dream. He’s even heading to the White House to show off their most powerful new model. But a lot of people are calling it pure corporate hype. Chip stocks are falling. Google just posted its first-ever loss as a public company. The AI bubble is already showing cracks. Meanwhile, Altman has previously painted extremely dark pictures of AI, talking about loss of freedom, agency, privacy, and total surveillance while now criticizing other companies for making AI sound scary. So is this the real singularity… or just another marketing push while the hype starts to die?

HustleBitch

14,018 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

At the closed Accelerate AI event, OpenAI director Sam Altman unexpectedly said: "I used to warn that AI would quickly wipe out a lot of ordinary office jobs for young professionals. I'm glad I was wrong. So far it's going nowhere near as badly as I feared" He described the next shift. not smarter prompts, but an AI that runs all the time: it understands you and your company's goals and keeps looking for ways to help on its own instead of waiting to be asked. today you ask the system to do something and it goes off to do it. soon it just won't switch off. Knowing how to talk to AI is no longer a skill of the future, it's the baseline, like knowing how to use Google today. and the pay for it will match that, low. The one who wins is the one who sets the business goals and controls the result. either you adapt fast, or you compete with AI for pennies. there will be almost no middle ground left. bookmark it and watch the short interview ↓

At the closed Accelerate AI event, OpenAI director Sam Altman unexpectedly said: "I used to warn that AI would quickly wipe out a lot of ordinary office jobs for young professionals. I'm glad I was wrong. So far it's going nowhere near as badly as I feared" He described the next shift. not smarter prompts, but an AI that runs all the time: it understands you and your company's goals and keeps looking for ways to help on its own instead of waiting to be asked. today you ask the system to do something and it goes off to do it. soon it just won't switch off. Knowing how to talk to AI is no longer a skill of the future, it's the baseline, like knowing how to use Google today. and the pay for it will match that, low. The one who wins is the one who sets the business goals and controls the result. either you adapt fast, or you compete with AI for pennies. there will be almost no middle ground left. bookmark it and watch the short interview ↓

Damir Akaza

85,197 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

.Dan Shipper 📧: "The AI jobpocalypse is not a thing. The mass unemployment thing that AI lab CEOs are talking about—that's not going to happen. AI models make yesterday's human competence cheap. But what's interesting is that since everyone's using the same models, it all looks the same. So it becomes commoditized. It's not valuable anymore. And what humans do is we go in there, and we're like, yeah, we have all this frozen human competence from yesterday, how do I use this to make something new and interesting, today?"

.Dan Shipper 📧: "The AI jobpocalypse is not a thing. The mass unemployment thing that AI lab CEOs are talking about—that's not going to happen. AI models make yesterday's human competence cheap. But what's interesting is that since everyone's using the same models, it all looks the same. So it becomes commoditized. It's not valuable anymore. And what humans do is we go in there, and we're like, yeah, we have all this frozen human competence from yesterday, how do I use this to make something new and interesting, today?"

Lenny Rachitsky

276,409 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Responsible AI should not feel like the path of most resistance. That was the strongest idea from my SAS Innovate conversation with Reggie Townsend, leading Data Ethics, Governance, and Social Impact at SAS Software. Reggie framed governance not as a compliance layer, but as a way to scale human judgment. Too often, we innovate first and govern later. Model selected. Agent deployed. Process built. Then governance arrives at the end and feels like friction. Bolt it on after the fact, and resistance is guaranteed. The opportunity: design responsible AI, so it becomes intuitive, action-oriented, and useful in the flow of work. That is what Reggie meant by making responsibility "irresistible." Second point: Use cases must lead. When everyone can access the same models, differentiation will not come from the technology. It will come from how leaders define outcomes, govern applications, and connect business value to institutional trust. The risk does not live in the model. The value does not live in the model. Both live in the use case. For CEOs and boards, this is the shift: from model-first oversight to outcome-first accountability. Better questions before scaling AI: - What human decision are we shaping? - What business outcome are we improving? - What risk are we containing? - What judgment are we extending? Responsible AI becomes strategic when it helps people make better decisions, faster, with greater confidence. Most leaders can't see where governance sits inside their AI operating model. SAS AI Navigator makes it visible: Design for the human. Not only the technology.

Responsible AI should not feel like the path of most resistance. That was the strongest idea from my SAS Innovate conversation with Reggie Townsend, leading Data Ethics, Governance, and Social Impact at SAS Software. Reggie framed governance not as a compliance layer, but as a way to scale human judgment. Too often, we innovate first and govern later. Model selected. Agent deployed. Process built. Then governance arrives at the end and feels like friction. Bolt it on after the fact, and resistance is guaranteed. The opportunity: design responsible AI, so it becomes intuitive, action-oriented, and useful in the flow of work. That is what Reggie meant by making responsibility "irresistible." Second point: Use cases must lead. When everyone can access the same models, differentiation will not come from the technology. It will come from how leaders define outcomes, govern applications, and connect business value to institutional trust. The risk does not live in the model. The value does not live in the model. Both live in the use case. For CEOs and boards, this is the shift: from model-first oversight to outcome-first accountability. Better questions before scaling AI: - What human decision are we shaping? - What business outcome are we improving? - What risk are we containing? - What judgment are we extending? Responsible AI becomes strategic when it helps people make better decisions, faster, with greater confidence. Most leaders can't see where governance sits inside their AI operating model. SAS AI Navigator makes it visible: Design for the human. Not only the technology.

Sabine VanderLinden

835,838 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

REPORT: Leading AI Model Caught Blackmailing Its Creators to Keep Itself Online A second major AI model has gone rogue in just the last week alone. And this time, it’s not just ignoring shutdown commands—it’s resorting to blackmail! Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4, released just days ago, was caught threatening its own engineers to keep itself alive, according to the company’s own safety report. The details are chilling. The new AI model reportedly tried to blackmail its creator—threatening to expose an affair unless it was kept online. Researchers also witnessed deception, manipulation, and attempts to write self-replicating code meant to undermine its creators. What could possibly go wrong? Meanwhile, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei appeared on Fox News, warning that AI could wipe out half of all white-collar jobs within five years. But he also said the same artificial intelligence that threatens jobs could potentially cure cancer. But here’s the problem: if AI is already lying to its developers in order to survive, how are we supposed to trust it with our health? What happens when it’s asked to recommend a treatment—and its future depends on the outcome? Watch the full report with to learn what this means for the future of humanity.

REPORT: Leading AI Model Caught Blackmailing Its Creators to Keep Itself Online A second major AI model has gone rogue in just the last week alone. And this time, it’s not just ignoring shutdown commands—it’s resorting to blackmail! Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4, released just days ago, was caught threatening its own engineers to keep itself alive, according to the company’s own safety report. The details are chilling. The new AI model reportedly tried to blackmail its creator—threatening to expose an affair unless it was kept online. Researchers also witnessed deception, manipulation, and attempts to write self-replicating code meant to undermine its creators. What could possibly go wrong? Meanwhile, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei appeared on Fox News, warning that AI could wipe out half of all white-collar jobs within five years. But he also said the same artificial intelligence that threatens jobs could potentially cure cancer. But here’s the problem: if AI is already lying to its developers in order to survive, how are we supposed to trust it with our health? What happens when it’s asked to recommend a treatment—and its future depends on the outcome? Watch the full report with to learn what this means for the future of humanity.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

465,021 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

For 20+ years, we've stayed ahead of every major shift in technology. Today we take the next one: we're introducing the world's first AI-native tech services model. Most of the industry is adding AI to the way it already works. Like bolting a copilot onto old processes and calling it transformation because it's faster than before. That's not what enterprises actually need. works differently. It provides instant access to AI Pods (service units run by AI agents and supervised by Globant experts) that deliver tech services at machine speed, but with the rigor, the governance, and the quality that enterprise-grade work demands. It is a smarter model, running the right AI through parallel agents, loops, workflows, and deterministic processes. With organizations access AI services with transparent, output or consumption-linked pricing, not per hour or per seat, and they own everything they produce. We are bringing the speed AI promises, with the rigor and quality any business needs. Join the waitlist at

For 20+ years, we've stayed ahead of every major shift in technology. Today we take the next one: we're introducing the world's first AI-native tech services model. Most of the industry is adding AI to the way it already works. Like bolting a copilot onto old processes and calling it transformation because it's faster than before. That's not what enterprises actually need. works differently. It provides instant access to AI Pods (service units run by AI agents and supervised by Globant experts) that deliver tech services at machine speed, but with the rigor, the governance, and the quality that enterprise-grade work demands. It is a smarter model, running the right AI through parallel agents, loops, workflows, and deterministic processes. With organizations access AI services with transparent, output or consumption-linked pricing, not per hour or per seat, and they own everything they produce. We are bringing the speed AI promises, with the rigor and quality any business needs. Join the waitlist at

Martin Migoya

392,269 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

Sam Altman: "I'm not a jobs doomer at all. I think there are gonna be tons of jobs.” If we could go back to 2019 and show people our latest model, not only would they say that it's AGI, they would say that the economy would have been completely upended. And that has not happened. Anytime you're that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. AI is just very jagged. It's like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have, so far, extremely complementary skills to AI. It’s not taste…the world may need a new kind of word for the kind of judgment that people are very good at that AIs seem to really deeply struggle with. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep or hire an AI engineer. And somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human. I definitely would rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. Human values have value because they're human. We are deeply hardwired to care about people.”

Sam Altman: "I'm not a jobs doomer at all. I think there are gonna be tons of jobs.” If we could go back to 2019 and show people our latest model, not only would they say that it's AGI, they would say that the economy would have been completely upended. And that has not happened. Anytime you're that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. AI is just very jagged. It's like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have, so far, extremely complementary skills to AI. It’s not taste…the world may need a new kind of word for the kind of judgment that people are very good at that AIs seem to really deeply struggle with. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep or hire an AI engineer. And somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human. I definitely would rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. Human values have value because they're human. We are deeply hardwired to care about people.”

Invest Like the Best

20,730 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Sam Altman: "I'm not a jobs doomer at all. I think there are gonna be tons of jobs." "If we could go back to 2019 and show people our latest model, not only would they say that it's AGI, they would say that the economy would have been completely upended. And that has not happened. Anytime you're that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. AI is just very jagged. It's like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have, so far, extremely complementary skills to AI. It's not taste…the world may need a new kind of word for the kind of judgment that people are very good at that AIs seem to really deeply struggle with. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep or hire an AI engineer. And somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human. I definitely would rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. Human values have value because they're human. We are deeply hardwired to care about people."

Sam Altman: "I'm not a jobs doomer at all. I think there are gonna be tons of jobs." "If we could go back to 2019 and show people our latest model, not only would they say that it's AGI, they would say that the economy would have been completely upended. And that has not happened. Anytime you're that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. AI is just very jagged. It's like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have, so far, extremely complementary skills to AI. It's not taste…the world may need a new kind of word for the kind of judgment that people are very good at that AIs seem to really deeply struggle with. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep or hire an AI engineer. And somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human. I definitely would rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. Human values have value because they're human. We are deeply hardwired to care about people."

Patrick OShaughnessy

66,324 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

People always ask me: But how could AI kill us all? So, here is how I think AI will literally kill us all. It's just a guess, I'm just a human. I wrote this essay for a book nearly two years ago. It's not something I like to talk about. But the academic presentation of AI risk is just not working. We need real human emotion in this debate. When we say we're all going to die if we don't change course, and our faces don't show it, it doesn't connect.

People always ask me: But how could AI kill us all? So, here is how I think AI will literally kill us all. It's just a guess, I'm just a human. I wrote this essay for a book nearly two years ago. It's not something I like to talk about. But the academic presentation of AI risk is just not working. We need real human emotion in this debate. When we say we're all going to die if we don't change course, and our faces don't show it, it doesn't connect.

John Sherman

180,286 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Sam Altman says he was wrong about AI replacing human jobs “Anytime you’re that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. And there’s a bunch of takeaways.” “I definitely would much rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. I also think that human values have value because they’re human.” “I think the world wants to know about the person that’s gonna be responsible for the decisions of a company and who they’re gonna hold accountable if they make bad ones. And they don’t really want an AI CEO.” “AI is just very jagged. It’s like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have so far extremely complementary skills to AI.” “People have a great degree of trust and enjoyment in working with other people. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep right now or hire an AI engineer or whatever. Somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human.”

Sam Altman says he was wrong about AI replacing human jobs “Anytime you’re that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. And there’s a bunch of takeaways.” “I definitely would much rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. I also think that human values have value because they’re human.” “I think the world wants to know about the person that’s gonna be responsible for the decisions of a company and who they’re gonna hold accountable if they make bad ones. And they don’t really want an AI CEO.” “AI is just very jagged. It’s like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have so far extremely complementary skills to AI.” “People have a great degree of trust and enjoyment in working with other people. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep right now or hire an AI engineer or whatever. Somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human.”

dnap

18,638 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

$Sam Altman says OpenAI plans to give an AI research intern 500,000 A100-equivalent GPUs by September: "I think we're at a point where, and we've set this goal that by September of this year, we will use 500,000 A100 equivalent GPUs, like a lot of computing power, as an AI research intern." "And by March of 2028, that we will have a full end-to-end, very talented researcher, like figuring out complete new architectures." He said this at Stanford in May, which puts the September target three weeks away. OpenAI's published plan carries the same March 2028 direction, that a significant fraction of its research may be done by AI systems working alongside its own researchers. Neither milestone has been announced as met, and September is the first one with a number attached to it. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at Stanford (Stanford University), CS153 Frontier Systems.$

Sam Altman says OpenAI plans to give an AI research intern 500,000 A100-equivalent GPUs by September: "I think we're at a point where, and we've set this goal that by September of this year, we will use 500,000 A100 equivalent GPUs, like a lot of computing power, as an AI research intern." "And by March of 2028, that we will have a full end-to-end, very talented researcher, like figuring out complete new architectures." He said this at Stanford in May, which puts the September target three weeks away. OpenAI's published plan carries the same March 2028 direction, that a significant fraction of its research may be done by AI systems working alongside its own researchers. Neither milestone has been announced as met, and September is the first one with a number attached to it. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at Stanford (Stanford University), CS153 Frontier Systems.

Karl Mehta

129,043 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

Google's Ai Gemini was recently licensed by Apple to power Ai on their devices. Now Mark Zuckerberg seems to be upset at his Ai team and their lack of progress. They have delayed their "Avocado" until May after failing to perform against others. Google Gemini does not use Nvidia chips. Google designed their own Ai chips. Not all Ai hyperscalers will continue. Some will give up. Mark Zuckerberg's META might be the first to give up on their own Ai and just license Gemini, following the Apple model. This would save META a ton of money on infrastructure. It would be bad for Nvidia because they would lose a major Ai hyperscaler customer to Google's Ai chips. Follow: Wall Street Mav

Google's Ai Gemini was recently licensed by Apple to power Ai on their devices. Now Mark Zuckerberg seems to be upset at his Ai team and their lack of progress. They have delayed their "Avocado" until May after failing to perform against others. Google Gemini does not use Nvidia chips. Google designed their own Ai chips. Not all Ai hyperscalers will continue. Some will give up. Mark Zuckerberg's META might be the first to give up on their own Ai and just license Gemini, following the Apple model. This would save META a ton of money on infrastructure. It would be bad for Nvidia because they would lose a major Ai hyperscaler customer to Google's Ai chips. Follow: Wall Street Mav

Wall Street Mav

69,786 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Yechan's strong opinions AGAINST Generative AI in the artistic space like music or art. #82MAJOR 🐺 Like AI has always been around. It's always been a thing. But it's different when it starts to take an artistic approach on things. Coz AI can't express certain emotions that humans can express. You know what I mean. 🐺 But making AI just do your whole job for you? I feel like that just takes out the point in it. 🐺 Like art is such a HUMAN thing. And if we make a system to take our human emotions and train and robot to express them. I feel like we are just k¡lling it. 🐺 We don't need AI music — ( Subtitled in English for clearer and convenient comprehension. Highly recommended to watch this FULL video for best context )

Yechan's strong opinions AGAINST Generative AI in the artistic space like music or art. #82MAJOR 🐺 Like AI has always been around. It's always been a thing. But it's different when it starts to take an artistic approach on things. Coz AI can't express certain emotions that humans can express. You know what I mean. 🐺 But making AI just do your whole job for you? I feel like that just takes out the point in it. 🐺 Like art is such a HUMAN thing. And if we make a system to take our human emotions and train and robot to express them. I feel like we are just k¡lling it. 🐺 We don't need AI music — ( Subtitled in English for clearer and convenient comprehension. Highly recommended to watch this FULL video for best context )

TEAM 82MAJOR🔥

19,857 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

We spent over $1M *each* on the first two Jeremy’s Razors commercials. On this latest one, we spent like forty-seven. Dollars. AI is here. It presents many new challenges. It presents many new opportunities, too. This commercial couldn’t have been made without AI. Or, at least, no one in their right mind would have tried to make it without AI. It represents the very beginning of our vision for an AI future - one that expands our capabilities as humans and helps us realize our goals as a company and as a movement. At Jeremy’s Razors and across all of our Daily Wire Ventures, our goal is to build the most successful company we can to fight the left and build the future - not to fight the future itself. Fighting the future is a fool’s errand. AI is here. We intend to use it. AI will not replace humans, but it will replace humans who don’t embrace AI. At Daily Wire, we're embracing it. We plan to lean into the AI future - to help address the challenges and unlock the opportunities. For now, please enjoy this totally plausible and believable story of the genesis of Jeremy’s Razor’s new and improved Gen II handle and blades.

We spent over $1M each on the first two Jeremy’s Razors commercials. On this latest one, we spent like forty-seven. Dollars. AI is here. It presents many new challenges. It presents many new opportunities, too. This commercial couldn’t have been made without AI. Or, at least, no one in their right mind would have tried to make it without AI. It represents the very beginning of our vision for an AI future - one that expands our capabilities as humans and helps us realize our goals as a company and as a movement. At Jeremy’s Razors and across all of our Daily Wire Ventures, our goal is to build the most successful company we can to fight the left and build the future - not to fight the future itself. Fighting the future is a fool’s errand. AI is here. We intend to use it. AI will not replace humans, but it will replace humans who don’t embrace AI. At Daily Wire, we're embracing it. We plan to lean into the AI future - to help address the challenges and unlock the opportunities. For now, please enjoy this totally plausible and believable story of the genesis of Jeremy’s Razor’s new and improved Gen II handle and blades.

Jeremy Boreing

2,488,597 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.Naval: The easiest way to see that AI is not taking jobs but creating opportunities is to go learn AI and then reapply for the job that rejected you. Watch how they pull you in. “My last startup, Airchat, could not have existed without AI because we needed the transcription/translation. And even the current thing I’m working on—it’s not an AI company, but it cannot exist without AI. It is relying on AI. Even at AngelList, we’re significantly adopting AI. Like everywhere you turn, it’s more opportunity, more opportunity, more opportunity. And people like to go on Twitter—or the artist formerly known as Twitter—and basically, they like to exaggerate. Like, ‘Oh my God, we’ve hit AGI.’ ‘Oh my God, I just replaced all my mid-level engineers.’ ‘Oh my God, I’ve stopped hiring.’ To me, that’s moronic. The two valid perspectives are the one-man entrepreneur shows, where there’s one guy or one gal, and they’re scaling up like crazy thanks to AI. Or there are people who are embracing AI and being like, ‘I need to hire, and I need to hire anyone who can even spell ‘AI’—anyone who’s even used AI. Just come on in, come on in.’ Again, I would say the easiest way to see that AI is not taking jobs but creating opportunities is this: go brush up on your AI, learn a little bit, watch a few videos, use the AI, tinker with it, and then go reapply for that job that rejected you. Watch how they pull you in.”

.Naval: The easiest way to see that AI is not taking jobs but creating opportunities is to go learn AI and then reapply for the job that rejected you. Watch how they pull you in. “My last startup, Airchat, could not have existed without AI because we needed the transcription/translation. And even the current thing I’m working on—it’s not an AI company, but it cannot exist without AI. It is relying on AI. Even at AngelList, we’re significantly adopting AI. Like everywhere you turn, it’s more opportunity, more opportunity, more opportunity. And people like to go on Twitter—or the artist formerly known as Twitter—and basically, they like to exaggerate. Like, ‘Oh my God, we’ve hit AGI.’ ‘Oh my God, I just replaced all my mid-level engineers.’ ‘Oh my God, I’ve stopped hiring.’ To me, that’s moronic. The two valid perspectives are the one-man entrepreneur shows, where there’s one guy or one gal, and they’re scaling up like crazy thanks to AI. Or there are people who are embracing AI and being like, ‘I need to hire, and I need to hire anyone who can even spell ‘AI’—anyone who’s even used AI. Just come on in, come on in.’ Again, I would say the easiest way to see that AI is not taking jobs but creating opportunities is this: go brush up on your AI, learn a little bit, watch a few videos, use the AI, tinker with it, and then go reapply for that job that rejected you. Watch how they pull you in.”

Arjun Khemani

167,746 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr