正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Sam Gituku: The decision about Safaricom is by a three-judge bench, why Justice Kiage? Nelson Havi: The other day, the Court of Appeal rescinded a decision it had written because that decision was delivered on the wrong application. The two other judges said they were not aware of the... show more

Citizen TV Kenya

6,855,082 subscribers

48,389 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Njeri Maina: The decision by the President to remove vetting is a welcomed decision in regard to Article 27 of the Constitution. The timing for me is really suspect, why did the President have to wait two and a half years to make that declaration? #CitizenDayBreak Sam Gituku

Njeri Maina: The decision by the President to remove vetting is a welcomed decision in regard to Article 27 of the Constitution. The timing for me is really suspect, why did the President have to wait two and a half years to make that declaration? #CitizenDayBreak Sam Gituku

Citizen TV Kenya

56,700 次观看 • 1 年前

In all the screeching over the Virginia Supreme Court redistricting decision, it’s getting lost that the decision was written by Justice Arthur Kelsey, who was put on the appellate bench by Democratic Gov. Mark Warner& confirmed to the Supreme Court by EVERY legislative Democrat.

In all the screeching over the Virginia Supreme Court redistricting decision, it’s getting lost that the decision was written by Justice Arthur Kelsey, who was put on the appellate bench by Democratic Gov. Mark Warner& confirmed to the Supreme Court by EVERY legislative Democrat.

Brad Todd

235,364 次观看 • 3 个月前

Supreme Court Decision on ADC Should Not Warrant Celebration, Nothing Has Been Decided - Maduabuchi The ADC had no business at the Supreme Court. There was no appealable decision by the Federal High Court. The Court of Appeal overstepped its bounds by making an order no one sought. In reaching the proper decision that there was no valid appeal by the David Mark faction, the Court of Appeal went a step further and ordered that the _status quo_ be maintained. That was wrong. When INEC, acting on the Court of Appeal’s order, removed David Mark, it was on solid ground. The Appellate Court’s order was to maintain _status quo ante bellum_, not _status quo_. Oba Maduabuchi, SAN

Supreme Court Decision on ADC Should Not Warrant Celebration, Nothing Has Been Decided - Maduabuchi The ADC had no business at the Supreme Court. There was no appealable decision by the Federal High Court. The Court of Appeal overstepped its bounds by making an order no one sought. In reaching the proper decision that there was no valid appeal by the David Mark faction, the Court of Appeal went a step further and ordered that the _status quo_ be maintained. That was wrong. When INEC, acting on the Court of Appeal’s order, removed David Mark, it was on solid ground. The Appellate Court’s order was to maintain _status quo ante bellum_, not _status quo_. Oba Maduabuchi, SAN

ARISE NEWS

75,611 次观看 • 3 个月前

Josep Borrell, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy: "It is not a political decision. It is a decision of a court: the International Court of Justice. The decision of the court has to be respected and implemented. So I take note of the decision of the International Criminal Court to issue arrest warrants for Prime Minister Netanyahu, the former Minister of Defence Mr Gallant, and the Hamas leaders. This decision is a binding decision, and all states parties of the court - which include all members of the European Union - are binding to implement this court decision."

Josep Borrell, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy: "It is not a political decision. It is a decision of a court: the International Court of Justice. The decision of the court has to be respected and implemented. So I take note of the decision of the International Criminal Court to issue arrest warrants for Prime Minister Netanyahu, the former Minister of Defence Mr Gallant, and the Hamas leaders. This decision is a binding decision, and all states parties of the court - which include all members of the European Union - are binding to implement this court decision."

WikiLeaks

92,719 次观看 • 1 年前

Abbott: The judge who issued the opinion was overturned by a fifth circuit court last year for his most recent decision in redistricting and he got it wrong then. He got this one wrong now I feel confident the Supreme Court is going to agree that this decision was a gross misjudgment.

Abbott: The judge who issued the opinion was overturned by a fifth circuit court last year for his most recent decision in redistricting and he got it wrong then. He got this one wrong now I feel confident the Supreme Court is going to agree that this decision was a gross misjudgment.

Acyn

316,268 次观看 • 8 个月前

🇫🇷BREAKING: The mother of young Elias, killed in a machete attack by two repeat offenders, was openly insulted by French judges. The mother of 14-year-old Elias was called a "brainless victim." She was also accused of being a "populist" and on a "crusade against judges." The two repeat offenders who killed her son during a Paris mugging. They had 19 victims in just 2 weeks, but were released by a juvenile judge. The prosecutor had requested judicial supervision for the two criminals, but the juvenile judge refused this request. The judge noted they had "expressed regrets," which accounted for the leniency. That leniency cost Elias his life. They went on to murder him with a machete. If judges' decision cost a mother her son's life, she is a "populist" and "brainless" for questioning their decision. This is now the West we live in. Source: (CNews, Mabrouk Sonia)

🇫🇷BREAKING: The mother of young Elias, killed in a machete attack by two repeat offenders, was openly insulted by French judges. The mother of 14-year-old Elias was called a "brainless victim." She was also accused of being a "populist" and on a "crusade against judges." The two repeat offenders who killed her son during a Paris mugging. They had 19 victims in just 2 weeks, but were released by a juvenile judge. The prosecutor had requested judicial supervision for the two criminals, but the juvenile judge refused this request. The judge noted they had "expressed regrets," which accounted for the leniency. That leniency cost Elias his life. They went on to murder him with a machete. If judges' decision cost a mother her son's life, she is a "populist" and "brainless" for questioning their decision. This is now the West we live in. Source: (CNews, Mabrouk Sonia)

Remix News & Views

233,065 次观看 • 8 个月前

Kristi Noem on defying a court order: " I made that decision and that decision was under my complete authority… I'm so grateful that we get the opportunity every day to do that and to make decision… This is an activist judge…but I'm proud of the decisions that I've made."

Kristi Noem on defying a court order: " I made that decision and that decision was under my complete authority… I'm so grateful that we get the opportunity every day to do that and to make decision… This is an activist judge…but I'm proud of the decisions that I've made."

The Bulwark

69,504 次观看 • 8 个月前

ABC chief Washington correspondent Jonathan Karl on Trump deporting Tren de Aragua members: “[A] calculated decision to ignore the judge’s directive...[T]his is rather extraordinary. The hearing on this had already started before those planes took off. It was before the judge actually issued the order, but it was — after it was quite clear the judge was skeptical of the use of this 1798 Alien Enemies Act. By the way, that is an act that’s only been used three times in all of American history, so the judge was clearly skeptical of it...[T]he order was clear that even if the planes had taken off, they were to turn around...[T]his has huge implications for the other court cases working their way through right now on other actions by this President.”

ABC chief Washington correspondent Jonathan Karl on Trump deporting Tren de Aragua members: “[A] calculated decision to ignore the judge’s directive...[T]his is rather extraordinary. The hearing on this had already started before those planes took off. It was before the judge actually issued the order, but it was — after it was quite clear the judge was skeptical of the use of this 1798 Alien Enemies Act. By the way, that is an act that’s only been used three times in all of American history, so the judge was clearly skeptical of it...[T]he order was clear that even if the planes had taken off, they were to turn around...[T]his has huge implications for the other court cases working their way through right now on other actions by this President.”

Curtis Houck

534,636 次观看 • 1 年前

Used EVs will not attract GST when sold between two individuals, said FM Nirmala Sitharaman. Although the application of 18% GST on used EVs is not a blind decision, the centre had sought 5% GST but after a discussion, a decision on 18% GST was taken. #NirmalaSitharaman #EV

Used EVs will not attract GST when sold between two individuals, said FM Nirmala Sitharaman. Although the application of 18% GST on used EVs is not a blind decision, the centre had sought 5% GST but after a discussion, a decision on 18% GST was taken. #NirmalaSitharaman #EV

CNBC-TV18

277,819 次观看 • 1 年前

Oscar on the penalty: "I had a very clear opportunity, I went for it. The other two on the outside braked quite late and there was obviously a bit of a lock up into the corner but that was because I could see Kimi was not gonna give me any space. I can't disappear but the decision is what it is."

Oscar on the penalty: "I had a very clear opportunity, I went for it. The other two on the outside braked quite late and there was obviously a bit of a lock up into the corner but that was because I could see Kimi was not gonna give me any space. I can't disappear but the decision is what it is."

a⁸¹ 🐝🌸 | FAN ACCOUNT

290,321 次观看 • 9 个月前

A 14-year-old suspect smiled in court during the autopsy report. Moments later, the judge made a decision that stunned everyone. Was it justice… or too much?

A 14-year-old suspect smiled in court during the autopsy report. Moments later, the judge made a decision that stunned everyone. Was it justice… or too much?

PeterOnah

1,000,046 次观看 • 3 个月前

Abtisam Mohamed: "Have they [Israel] breached international law?" David Lammy: "That's a decision for a court, its not a decision for the govt" "But the court said its a decision for the executive" "Sorry?"

Abtisam Mohamed: "Have they [Israel] breached international law?" David Lammy: "That's a decision for a court, its not a decision for the govt" "But the court said its a decision for the executive" "Sorry?"

Saul Staniforth

350,602 次观看 • 1 年前

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

KV Iyyer - BHARAT 🇮🇳🇮🇱

220,408 次观看 • 6 个月前

RFK Jr: “They recommended putting masks on babies.” “The CDC told us it was science-based.” “It wasn't, it was a political decision.” “They allowed all of our schools to be closed and that order was written by the teachers union and it hurt working people all across this country.” “They said it was science-based, but it was a political decision.” “We're getting the politics out of the CDC and returning it to a science-based agency.”

RFK Jr: “They recommended putting masks on babies.” “The CDC told us it was science-based.” “It wasn't, it was a political decision.” “They allowed all of our schools to be closed and that order was written by the teachers union and it hurt working people all across this country.” “They said it was science-based, but it was a political decision.” “We're getting the politics out of the CDC and returning it to a science-based agency.”

End Tribalism in Politics

360,975 次观看 • 11 个月前