Same day, same hole, same group, same putt length. The AimPoint read is faster and a third of the footprints.

So spieth backed off and fidgeted over his putt and scott takes no time at all even before aim point. Not a good comparison

Stop wasting time reading 50 page documents. This AI tool is like ChatGPT for reading faster. Just upload any PDF and ask a question. It will give you an answer with page citations in seconds. Try it for free.

Almost 30 seconds on a 3ft putt still too long.

Love AimPoint but you gotta use a putt that doesn’t include a back off for this example

I’m happy to. See earlier posts. I’ll get plenty more also

😂😂 sample size of one 😂😂

I didn’t know there was still a discussion. I just thought AimPoint was standard by now.

But he stood still for a bit near the ball! Ban it!!

AimPoint is the best. Takes the guess work out of it. Science is best and when playing golf, it’s all science.

We're not arguing the old method isn't also slow. But using aimpoint from 5ft and in? Really?

Same break to read? Is this apples to apples?