The same 40 foot putt in the same group. The player using AimPoint made 77 fewer footprints and finished his read 2.5 times faster. Don’t believe the narrative.

Haha I love how the bottom video starts with both golfers just stepping onto the green while talking and the top he’s already started looking at the putt. Very fair time to start the clock.

Did you seriously just show a golfer taking 61 seconds to hit a putt as the gold standard of what process to use and how long to take to hit a 40 footer? Vs. another golfer who should be publicly caned?

They’re both slow.

I’m sorry but as a college golf coach I’ve witnessed the “narrative “ first hand. Players going thru this routine on 2.5 footers stomping on fellow competitors lines. It’s either being taught wrong or misunderstood by those doing it.

You probably searched days for this example. AimPoint is the dumbest thing to happen to golf in 50 years. Last week I saw a junior player walk toe to toe to the hole from 6 feet and then use AimPoint.

This doesn't prove anything other than one single golfer using aimpoint was quicker on one occasion than one golfer who didn't use it. Nobody ever said they are all slower. Its shit to watch and slower on average. That's all.

2.5 times faster?? What kind of math are you using?

There’s 0% chance this guy only humped his line one time for a 40 foot putt there’s context missing here. Aimpoint is for losers confirmed

Thxs for posting this. I was always anti AP solely bc I thought it took longer did more green damage. I had no data to back my claim up. So now I know! My opinion has changed. Thxs again

In my opinion, it's not about the steps, it is about the TIME. Both took over a minute. Isn't there a 40 second time limit?

No dog in this fight, but this comparison video ONLY proves that the top golfer is a faster player than the lower. My only concern about AP is on shorter putts, AP golfers sometimes stand between the ball and hole, creating more footprints nearer to the cup than necessary.

Yes

Ok. Who putting first?

But look at player 2 “stalk” that putt

Aim point is the scourge of golf.

Comparing one slow thing to another slow thing. There has to be a winner, but faster is relative.

Image and cartoon of the image … maybe just do this as a baby step.

Who went first? Bc it seems like the Aimpoint guy went 2nd and should’ve used less time getting a read from the first one

The footprint thing is bs anyhow, how many golfers are walking all over the holes all day? But only the footprints from someone in my grp will Matter lol

N=1. Must be true

Bullshit

You had a good run Mr AimPoint!

They both took way too long.

It’s the player, not the technique that matters.

The Aimpoint putter took all the same steps as 1st guy with his bag/caddie in tote and then still added 17 steps and 40 more seconds as the 2nd putter. Reading the “same” putt.

Aim point is the JOKE OF GOLF. HOW PREPOSTEROUS THIS WAS BUILT WITH A PLUMB BOB.

Both took too long

Counting footprints. This dork shit is why we want it out of here.

You be you

Oh goodness.

But player B didn’t have to look like an idiot

Do they make more putt though?

I do my reads at least four times faster than anyone using plumb bobbing with a putter that does not even hang straight🤣 or the ones who run around the greens in circles😂

It’s a gay look.

How about nobody is allowed to do any kind of reconnaissance. Ball lands on the green, must enter from front and go straight to your ball and hit it without marking or aiming. As long as it’s under the allowed time, do whatever the eff you want