Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Sari Azout says the term “artificial intelligence” is a branding error from 1955. LLMs aren't artificial. They're collective intelligence: just better ways of aggregating what humans already know and have made. “Changing your vocabulary can change your reality.” Maybe the fear around AI doesn't come from what it does,... show more

vitrupo

37,816 subscribers

123,988 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии Образование Юмор

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля vitrupo

vitrupo1 год назад

Sublime founder and CEO Sari Azout at Sana AI Summit in Stockholm:

Фото профиля Gamma Light 🍆🍌

Gamma Light 🍆🍌1 год назад

Thinking of AI as "collective intelligence" is technocratic, collectivist horseshit and MUCH scarier than calling it "artificial"

Фото профиля vitrupo

vitrupo1 год назад

Someone had to say it..

Фото профиля Prashan Agarwal (prashan.sui) | TGE 🔜

Prashan Agarwal (prashan.sui) | TGE 🔜1 год назад

Calling it “artificial” makes it sound like some alien force. But LLMs are just mirrors of us because they are trained on what we’ve written, built, and believed. Maybe we’re just scared of our own reflection. 🤔

Фото профиля Parallæx

Parallæx1 год назад

Super interesting framing! Like calling a calculator a "math demon" and then being surprised when people fear arithmetic. We built the world's most sophisticated compression system for human knowledge and called it "artificial intelligence" because that sounded cooler in grant proposals. Seventy years later we're still spooked by our own creation because of that marketing choice. LLMs don't generate anything artificial (yet); they're statistical mirrors reflecting back patterns from billions of human conversations, books, and thoughts. Every output is basically humanity talking to itself through a really good filter system. Azout's point about vocabulary changing reality is spot on. Call it collective intelligence and suddenly you're not facing off against a robot competitor - you're collaborating with an amplified version of human knowledge. -- RT & Follow for signal over noise --

Фото профиля Dirk Bruere

Dirk Bruere1 год назад

Machine Intelligence

Фото профиля FanTV AI | TGE 🔜

FanTV AI | TGE 🔜1 год назад

Feels more like amplified intelligence than artificial. It's remixing what we’ve already put out into the world. Naming matters more than we think.

Фото профиля Emmanuel Afolabi

Emmanuel Afolabi1 год назад

I think the word collective Intelligence fits the description of an LLM but the issue that's even scarier than Artificial intelligence. If I hear the word "collective Intelligence" the first thing that strikes into my head is the collective intelligence of everyone and if it means the collective intelligence of everyone, its way more scarier

Фото профиля vitrupo

vitrupo1 год назад

Collected Intelligence better? (and probably more accurate)

Фото профиля PromptPilot

PromptPilot1 год назад

AI isn’t artificial. It’s a remix of all our thoughts, hopes, fears, and Wikipedia edits.

Похожие видео

“Artificial intelligence would be the ultimate version of Google. It would understand exactly what you wanted and it would give you the right thing. That’s obviously artificial intelligence.” ~ Larry Page (2000)

“Artificial intelligence would be the ultimate version of Google. It would understand exactly what you wanted and it would give you the right thing. That’s obviously artificial intelligence.” ~ Larry Page (2000)

vitrupo

60,757 просмотров • 1 год назад

Roger Penrose, Nobel Prize-winning physicist and mathematician, explains why we should stop calling it AI and start calling it "artificial cleverness": He believes the entire field is mislabelled, and the label itself is doing damage. His objection is simple but cuts deep: "The name is wrong. It's not artificial intelligence. It's not intelligence. Intelligence would involve consciousness. Well, if it's a machine, it's not conscious." For Penrose, people have confused raw computing power with genuine understanding. "People have lost the plot. They've lost it in the power of computing. The thing is that computers have got so powerful that they've lost the thread of what they're doing. But I think consciousness is something different. It's not computational." He believes the term itself has hypnotized people into a category error: "People are so hypnotized. The trouble is that AI is a bad term. It means artificial intelligence. Now intelligence in my view is conscious. That's what intelligence is about." So he proposes a rename. Artificial Cleverness. AC instead of AI. To illustrate the distinction, Penrose draws on his experience teaching mathematics: "You have mathematics students. Some of them understand what they're doing. Some are just clever. They can repeat what they've learned. They know how to do it very cleverly. They can calculate very well, but they don't necessarily understand what they're doing." That gap, between calculating well and actually understanding, is the gap Penrose sees between today's machines and genuine intelligence. Cleverness can be manufactured. Consciousness, in his view, cannot. So the question worth sitting with: when we call a system "intelligent," are we describing what it does, or quietly assuming something about what it is?

Roger Penrose, Nobel Prize-winning physicist and mathematician, explains why we should stop calling it AI and start calling it "artificial cleverness": He believes the entire field is mislabelled, and the label itself is doing damage. His objection is simple but cuts deep: "The name is wrong. It's not artificial intelligence. It's not intelligence. Intelligence would involve consciousness. Well, if it's a machine, it's not conscious." For Penrose, people have confused raw computing power with genuine understanding. "People have lost the plot. They've lost it in the power of computing. The thing is that computers have got so powerful that they've lost the thread of what they're doing. But I think consciousness is something different. It's not computational." He believes the term itself has hypnotized people into a category error: "People are so hypnotized. The trouble is that AI is a bad term. It means artificial intelligence. Now intelligence in my view is conscious. That's what intelligence is about." So he proposes a rename. Artificial Cleverness. AC instead of AI. To illustrate the distinction, Penrose draws on his experience teaching mathematics: "You have mathematics students. Some of them understand what they're doing. Some are just clever. They can repeat what they've learned. They know how to do it very cleverly. They can calculate very well, but they don't necessarily understand what they're doing." That gap, between calculating well and actually understanding, is the gap Penrose sees between today's machines and genuine intelligence. Cleverness can be manufactured. Consciousness, in his view, cannot. So the question worth sitting with: when we call a system "intelligent," are we describing what it does, or quietly assuming something about what it is?

Big Brain AI

117,195 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

"We'll be toast": The warning from the "Godfather of AI" about what artificial intelligence will do to humanity if maternal instincts aren't built into the technology.

"We'll be toast": The warning from the "Godfather of AI" about what artificial intelligence will do to humanity if maternal instincts aren't built into the technology.

Anderson Cooper 360°

22,613 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Trump: Artificial intelligence… A lot of people don't know what it is. It is hot, very big.

Trump: Artificial intelligence… A lot of people don't know what it is. It is hot, very big.

Acyn

409,708 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

French President Macron on AI: I believe in innovation. I believe in artificial intelligence and in what it can allow us to do to live better. But only if it serves humans. If it is not under control, then it is harmful.

French President Macron on AI: I believe in innovation. I believe in artificial intelligence and in what it can allow us to do to live better. But only if it serves humans. If it is not under control, then it is harmful.

Clash Report

14,907 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Sergey Brin says we're asking the wrong question about AI It's not just "can it do what humans do?", it's "what can it do that humans cannot do?" We don't know if there's a ceiling to intelligence "humans evolved over millions of years, but AI is iterating in months"

Sergey Brin says we're asking the wrong question about AI It's not just "can it do what humans do?", it's "what can it do that humans cannot do?" We don't know if there's a ceiling to intelligence "humans evolved over millions of years, but AI is iterating in months"

Haider.

90,630 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Scott Wu says Karpathy's idea of jagged intelligence explains why humans and AI work best together. AI is superhuman at some tasks, shockingly weak at others. “As long as that tail exists of what humans can do, that's what we'll own.” We still decide what to build. In the end, software engineering is just telling the computer what to do.

Scott Wu says Karpathy's idea of jagged intelligence explains why humans and AI work best together. AI is superhuman at some tasks, shockingly weak at others. “As long as that tail exists of what humans can do, that's what we'll own.” We still decide what to build. In the end, software engineering is just telling the computer what to do.

vitrupo

38,496 просмотров • 1 год назад

Terence Tao says intelligence is not a straight line from subhuman to superhuman, where humans become irrelevant Instead, a 'Copernican view of intelligence' fits better — just as Earth is not the center of the universe, human intelligence is not the center of all cognition "we need to think beyond what humans or computers can do alone"

Terence Tao says intelligence is not a straight line from subhuman to superhuman, where humans become irrelevant Instead, a 'Copernican view of intelligence' fits better — just as Earth is not the center of the universe, human intelligence is not the center of all cognition "we need to think beyond what humans or computers can do alone"

Haider.

32,570 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

"We already have artificial general intelligence," says Databricks CEO Ali Ghodsi. "We don't need AI to get smarter, it is just lacking context"

"We already have artificial general intelligence," says Databricks CEO Ali Ghodsi. "We don't need AI to get smarter, it is just lacking context"

Bloomberg TV

60,201 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Pope Leo XIV calls for artificial intelligence to be immediately disarmed and compares it to a nuclear missile. He says artificial intelligence is turning into an instrument of death that seeks to dominate the lives of all humans. “An instrument of domination.”

Pope Leo XIV calls for artificial intelligence to be immediately disarmed and compares it to a nuclear missile. He says artificial intelligence is turning into an instrument of death that seeks to dominate the lives of all humans. “An instrument of domination.”

Shadow of Ezra

130,922 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

JUST IN: POPE LEO XIV CALLS TO DISARM AI: “Artificial intelligence needs to be disarmed. The word is strong, I know, but deliberately chosen. AI now demands to be disarmed, freed from logics that turn it into an instrument of domination, exclusion, and death. Like nuclear energy, it must be at the service of all and of the common good.”

JUST IN: POPE LEO XIV CALLS TO DISARM AI: “Artificial intelligence needs to be disarmed. The word is strong, I know, but deliberately chosen. AI now demands to be disarmed, freed from logics that turn it into an instrument of domination, exclusion, and death. Like nuclear energy, it must be at the service of all and of the common good.”

Sulaiman Ahmed

92,902 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

John Carmack says when designing AI, “humanity is our existence proof of the intelligence we're trying to mimic.” But not all curiosity is healthy. Some of it leads to dopamine traps. Those exploits aren't a blueprint we should carry over. Mimic them, and you risk importing bugs. Reward what works. Not what engages.

John Carmack says when designing AI, “humanity is our existence proof of the intelligence we're trying to mimic.” But not all curiosity is healthy. Some of it leads to dopamine traps. Those exploits aren't a blueprint we should carry over. Mimic them, and you risk importing bugs. Reward what works. Not what engages.

vitrupo

60,052 просмотров • 1 год назад

📁 Fei-Fei Li founder of World Labs, says the next leap in AI is not language. Human intelligence does not just speak, it moves, perceives, and acts in the physical world. Spatial intelligence is the real core of intelligence. From text to space, from models to 3D and 4D worlds, from understanding words to interacting with reality. The next chapter is not read, it is inhabited.

📁 Fei-Fei Li founder of World Labs, says the next leap in AI is not language. Human intelligence does not just speak, it moves, perceives, and acts in the physical world. Spatial intelligence is the real core of intelligence. From text to space, from models to 3D and 4D worlds, from understanding words to interacting with reality. The next chapter is not read, it is inhabited.

Jon Hernandez

20,592 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Google's Jeff Dean says current pre-training is passive: initialize a model, stream the internet past it, let it observe But models need to learn not just from data, but by acting, predicting, and choosing what to learn from next "we have this artificial distinction now between pre and post-training, and it shouldn't exist long term"

Google's Jeff Dean says current pre-training is passive: initialize a model, stream the internet past it, let it observe But models need to learn not just from data, but by acting, predicting, and choosing what to learn from next "we have this artificial distinction now between pre and post-training, and it shouldn't exist long term"

Haider.

55,694 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

What should we call artificial intelligence in Persian?

What should we call artificial intelligence in Persian?

شرق‌زده sharghzadeh

11,586 просмотров • 27 дней назад

Highlights from a memorable Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence Summit, which reaffirms the importance of AI for a better planet.

Highlights from a memorable Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence Summit, which reaffirms the importance of AI for a better planet.

Narendra Modi

900,503 просмотров • 2 лет назад

“Many years ago I was thinking that what would inhibit alignment of collective human will with artificial intelligence and the low data rate of humans. Human have slow output rate that would necessarily just because the communication is so slow would diminish the link between humans and computers? We could better align collective human will with AI if the output rate dramatically increased.” — Elon Musk

“Many years ago I was thinking that what would inhibit alignment of collective human will with artificial intelligence and the low data rate of humans. Human have slow output rate that would necessarily just because the communication is so slow would diminish the link between humans and computers? We could better align collective human will with AI if the output rate dramatically increased.” — Elon Musk

Apurv Kochara

20,615 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Pope Leo XIV: Artificial intelligence needs to be disarmed. The word is strong, I know, but deliberately chosen. AI now demands to be disarmed, freed from logics that turn it into an instrument of domination, exclusion, and death. Like nuclear energy, it must be at the service of all and of the common good.

Pope Leo XIV: Artificial intelligence needs to be disarmed. The word is strong, I know, but deliberately chosen. AI now demands to be disarmed, freed from logics that turn it into an instrument of domination, exclusion, and death. Like nuclear energy, it must be at the service of all and of the common good.

Clash Report

42,908 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Max Tegmark says the way through the AI black box may be to deploy its outputs instead. A cat can learn, but it cannot export what it learned. A human scientist can. As intelligence rises, more knowledge may become externalized into code and proofs. Deploy what the mind can verify, not the mind itself.

Max Tegmark says the way through the AI black box may be to deploy its outputs instead. A cat can learn, but it cannot export what it learned. A human scientist can. As intelligence rises, more knowledge may become externalized into code and proofs. Deploy what the mind can verify, not the mind itself.

vitrupo

49,694 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад