Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Saw Genesis aims to differentiate itself from competing games like Dead by Daylight by adding 3 mechanics unique to this game 1. Rehabilitation traps: the judge (killer) can knock out the accused (victims) and bring them to a rehabilitation traps where the accused is given two options. Wait for...

137,083 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

The ruling by a High Court’ judge in the Mike Chimombe & Moses Mpofu case is very interesting. I encourage everyone in business, every director, Executive, tenderpreneur and every lawyer to watch it. The judge ruled that both accused have a case to answer. This means they must be put to their defence, and explain their conduct. Depriving them of such after the state rested its case would work against them and lead to their conviction. The judge articulated the law in detail and interpreted it clearly at great length explaining how he arrived at that decision. Note that the accused wanted the case dismissed, arguing that their clients had no case to answer since they didn’t award themselves the tender and that the tender was awarded to a company, not them as individuals. The hearing and subsequent ruling is interesting for the following reasons: •The two are accused of deceiving the state by submitting fraudulent documents and winning the tender. •The judge explains in detail the 3 essential elements /rails on which in a criminal case, a person accused of fraud can be acquitted without being put to their defence, that is the accused can apply for discharge at the close of the state’s case. • The first essential element is that there is no evidence presented linking the accused to the offence. The court has no choice but to acquit. •The second element is that there may be no evidence of an ingredient of the crime (there are essential ingredients of the crime), in which case the accused must be acquitted. •The third element is that the state witnesses’ testimony and evidence is so poor that a court cannot rely on it to convict, in which case the accused must be acquitted. •In their application for discharge, Mpofu and Chimombe didn’t raise essential element 3. In other words, they deemed the witnesses credible in their evidence. They didn’t argue that the evidence of the state witness isn’t credible. •Mpofu and Chimombe also didn’t raise element number 1, meaning they didn’t argue that they were not linked at all to the offence, in which case they would have persuaded the court for an acquittal. •The two accused sought to rely, in their application for discharge, on the second element, which is, they argued that an ingredient of the evidence of committing the crime was missing: in other words, they are arguing that indeed fraud, deception and misrepresentation occurred, but was not occasioned by them personally, but by companies that won the tenders. •The accused’s lawyer argued that the accused did not influence the award of the bid, may have participated by signing contracts after the award, but that is neither here nor there, making their involvement post facto. They further argued that the state dealt with a corporate entity, not an individual. The state would have to pierce the corporate veil through an application to that effect to get to Mpofu and Chimombe. This is where it gets more interesting. •The judge delves into the issue of the corporate veil in criminal matters in detail. He explains that the effect of section 277 of the criminal code and reform act is to remove the corporate veil that exists in common law on criminal issues relating to companies. It’s very important for employees and directors to grasp these aspects of the law. The judge also touches on aspects of vicarious liability. •The companies act and criminal code were modified a lot in the last ten years. Most people are not aware of this. •Watch the hearing and ruling and educate yourself. Busisa Moyo Tawanda Nyambirai @tino_chinyoka1 Retired Elder Rex M.E Midzi

mmatigari

20,172 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Judge Phahlane unprovoked, allegedly conceded that indeed when allegations of her being bribed were made it was November 2021, in her own words the case didn’t exist until she was appointed in May 2022. Now the anonymous tip off which was explicit in its nature detailing the name of the judge who is bribed and the involvement of the Judge President Dustan Mlambo in this conspiracy of defeating the end of justice is made before she is appointed as detailed in a letter addressed to the Justice cluster including the Chief justice Raymond Zondo. The million dollar question is whether the whistle-blower he or she is a prophet or a time traveller who went to the future from November 2021 and saw the appointment in May 2022. When this concessions were made by the Judge unprovoked we set back with hope that the Judge President will act on this serious allegations giving him the benefit of doubt that he forms no part in this shenanigans, his silence can only mean that Judge Phahlane was correct when she mentioned to the Murder and fraud accused Bhekumuzi Sandlana that the Judge president is her friend she will ask him to allocate the case of IPHC succession to her. Mr Ndala by January 2022 as he was aware of the route the case will take he went and made a press briefing intimating that he know when the case will commence and by dawn of 2022 it would have been concluded. The question is how many cases which Judge Phahlane presided over and ruled unfairly in favour of those who may have put a price for her to turn a blind eye. What is the extent of her friend the Judge president involvement in this allegations. The clips and the anonymous letter are self-explanatory for the country to make their own judgement.

Modibe Vladimir Modiba

43,158 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

BREAKING: High Court Judge blocks Enoch Burke’s family from courtroom. Teacher Enoch Burke’s mother Martina and siblings Isaac and Ammi have stood by his side since May 2022 when the Principal of Wilson’s Hospital School demanded he use the “they” pronoun for a child in the school. Enoch Burke refused and was subsequently suspended in a flagrant breach of his constitutional rights to freedom of religion and freedom of conscience. Today he was forced to dial in by video link from Mountjoy Prison instead of attending in person a hearing before High Court Judge Brian Cregan. Before proceedings even began, and before anyone had spoken, Judge Cregan ordered Martina Burke, Isaac Burke and Ammi Burke to leave the room. The Burke family remained seated and reminded the Judge of their constitutional right to be present. Judge Cregan then rose, ordered the Gardaí to forcibly remove the Burkes, and left the courtroom. Open justice is a fundamental aspect of any functioning democracy. These are dark days in Irish courts. Judge Cregan then re-entered the courtroom and doubled down on his slander against Enoch Burke. The Judge restated that Enoch Burke was a “baleful and malign” presence in the school, “roaming” around the corridors of the school and “stalking the school, its teachers and pupils.” All of these statements are utterly false. Judge Cregan also reaffirmed that the pupils and teachers in the school had sworn affidavits against Enoch Burke. This is a blatant lie. Judge Brian Cregan has shown himself to be devoid of credibility. Three weeks ago Judge Cregan directed the Attorney General to bring criminal contempt proceedings against members of the Burke family. Judge Cregan had no right to do this, as the Judiciary and the Executive are separate powers. Last week, lawyers for the Attorney General appeared before Judge Cregan requesting that this direction would be withdrawn. They stated that it was inappropriate and wrong in law for Judge Cregan to instruct the Attorney General as to what to do in this regard. The direction was then withdrawn by the judge and changed to a request to “consider” bringing proceedings. Judge Cregan also continues to instruct Rosemary Mallon BL in these proceedings, despite the fact that her instructions should only be coming from her client, Wilson’s Hospital School. Rosemary Mallon willingly receives those instructions from the judge. Corrupt judges can disregard the Constitution and seek to strip upright citizens of their rights, but they will never succeed in removing God’s truth from society. Scripture says: “He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh” (Psalm 2:4). Truth will prevail.

Enoch Burke

641,885 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce