Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Saylor explains why they may eventually sell a small portion of Bitcoin: - If Bitcoin can’t be sold, critics say it has no value - If it has no value, the balance sheet value = zero - Credit rating agencies must recognize BTC as a real asset - We... show more

Alex 👽

12,893 subscribers

64,867 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology Finance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🔥SAYLOR CONFIRMS BITCOIN CAN BE SOLD Saylor says if Strategy equity trades above the net value of BTC, they sell the equity, not BTC. But if it trades below, they may sell BTC or BTC derivatives.

🔥SAYLOR CONFIRMS BITCOIN CAN BE SOLD Saylor says if Strategy equity trades above the net value of BTC, they sell the equity, not BTC. But if it trades below, they may sell BTC or BTC derivatives.

Coin Bureau

270,551 views • 8 months ago

Michael Saylor Explains Why He May Sell Bitcoin Strategy founder Michael Saylor Michael Saylor said in a May 9 interview with Bonnie Blockchain that if the company needs to sell a small amount of Bitcoin, it would be to realize capital gains and pay STRC credit dividends. He compared the model to real estate development: raising capital through credit instruments, buying an asset, and later monetizing it through a sale or refinancing after it appreciates. Responding to Peter Schiff's "Ponzi scheme" criticism, Saylor said the more accurate principle is to "never be a net seller of Bitcoin." At this stage, even if Strategy sells 1 Bitcoin, it would buy 10 to 20 at the same time.

Michael Saylor Explains Why He May Sell Bitcoin Strategy founder Michael Saylor Michael Saylor said in a May 9 interview with Bonnie Blockchain that if the company needs to sell a small amount of Bitcoin, it would be to realize capital gains and pay STRC credit dividends. He compared the model to real estate development: raising capital through credit instruments, buying an asset, and later monetizing it through a sale or refinancing after it appreciates. Responding to Peter Schiff's "Ponzi scheme" criticism, Saylor said the more accurate principle is to "never be a net seller of Bitcoin." At this stage, even if Strategy sells 1 Bitcoin, it would buy 10 to 20 at the same time.

Wu Blockchain

12,629 views • 2 months ago

Pio reveals the real reason why Saylor sold 32 Bitcoin "People ask why he sold the 32 Bitcoin, and it's two reasons. They want S&P inclusion, and they want a better rating from the agencies that rate these preferred equities. Right now their rating is junk, the agencies are literally writing the Bitcoin to zero, not recognizing it as an asset." "This sounds insane but go try it. If you have 5 million dollars of real Bitcoin on chain and you walk into a bank for a mortgage loan and offer it as collateral, they go, so that's zero. I'm not kidding. But if you hold IBIT, the Bitcoin ETF, that's totally fine, because it's just an equity." "The S&P gatekeepers specifically said that because Saylor had demonstrated he'd never sell any Bitcoin, they couldn't view it as a viable part of his balance sheet. So he needs to show he can pay the dividend with Bitcoin if he has to. Once stretch gets a AAA rating, do you know how much capital a thing paying 11% is going to attract?"

Pio reveals the real reason why Saylor sold 32 Bitcoin "People ask why he sold the 32 Bitcoin, and it's two reasons. They want S&P inclusion, and they want a better rating from the agencies that rate these preferred equities. Right now their rating is junk, the agencies are literally writing the Bitcoin to zero, not recognizing it as an asset." "This sounds insane but go try it. If you have 5 million dollars of real Bitcoin on chain and you walk into a bank for a mortgage loan and offer it as collateral, they go, so that's zero. I'm not kidding. But if you hold IBIT, the Bitcoin ETF, that's totally fine, because it's just an equity." "The S&P gatekeepers specifically said that because Saylor had demonstrated he'd never sell any Bitcoin, they couldn't view it as a viable part of his balance sheet. So he needs to show he can pay the dividend with Bitcoin if he has to. Once stretch gets a AAA rating, do you know how much capital a thing paying 11% is going to attract?"

Kai

66,616 views • 2 months ago

Michael Saylor $MSTR when asked if he would ever sell his $BTC Bitcoin: “Let me put it a different way…people who use fiat currency as a store of value, there’s a name for them, we call them poor.”

Michael Saylor $MSTR when asked if he would ever sell his $BTC Bitcoin: “Let me put it a different way…people who use fiat currency as a store of value, there’s a name for them, we call them poor.”

Bitcoin Teddy

241,064 views • 1 year ago

White House Crypto Czar @DavidSacks47 explains the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, the Digital Assets Stockpile, and why the U.S. government believes Bitcoin is special—a unique store of value that we should never sell.

White House Crypto Czar @DavidSacks47 explains the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, the Digital Assets Stockpile, and why the U.S. government believes Bitcoin is special—a unique store of value that we should never sell.

Michael Saylor

887,306 views • 1 year ago

Peter Schiff explains why he believes #Bitcoin has ZERO value: • Bitcoin and gold have no similarities • You can’t conduct electricity with it • You can’t make jewelry out it. Are these fair arguments? 😂

Peter Schiff explains why he believes #Bitcoin has ZERO value: • Bitcoin and gold have no similarities • You can’t conduct electricity with it • You can’t make jewelry out it. Are these fair arguments? 😂

The ₿itcoin Therapist

63,408 views • 3 years ago

Is Bitcoin only a store of value? 🤔 Pablo - Bull Bitcoin & GégéLSMR hit the floor at BTC Prague to ask Bitcoiners if they actually use #Bitcoin as money!

Is Bitcoin only a store of value? 🤔 Pablo - Bull Bitcoin & GégéLSMR hit the floor at BTC Prague to ask Bitcoiners if they actually use #Bitcoin as money!

BULLBITCOIN.COM

18,479 views • 1 year ago

🔥WATCH: MIchael Saylor on why Strategy sold $BTC. "The market's position was the company is worthless. Bitcoin is going to zero because they can't sell." "So we sold the Bitcoin at $59,000 and it traded up."

🔥WATCH: MIchael Saylor on why Strategy sold $BTC. "The market's position was the company is worthless. Bitcoin is going to zero because they can't sell." "So we sold the Bitcoin at $59,000 and it traded up."

Coin Bureau

83,827 views • 4 days ago

MICHAEL SAYLOR on CNBC: There is Universal consensus around the world that #Bitcoin is: - A decentralised global asset that has value - Has NO issuer - Is the Gold Standard of digital commodities

MICHAEL SAYLOR on CNBC: There is Universal consensus around the world that #Bitcoin is: - A decentralised global asset that has value - Has NO issuer - Is the Gold Standard of digital commodities

Bitcoin Archive

155,055 views • 3 years ago

Michael Saylor's Michael Saylor EPIC ADVICE for CEOs: "Stop investing in toxic money. Just raise $100 million and buy Bitcoin." at Abundance360 Summit 2024 with Peter H. Diamandis, MD "The Microstrategy story is: We had $600 million enterprise value with $600 million cash - which is a liability. What do we do? We flip it to be $600 million Bitcoin and a $600 million enterprise." "And Bitcoin has been going up 40% a year... So you flip your balance sheet to be an asset, and today the enterprise value of the company is $30 billion." "The enterprise value is up by a factor of x40. It took 42 months... Not 40 years... I haven't graduated from my senior year of Bitcoin." #MichaelSaylor #Bitcoin $MSTR Strategy

Michael Saylor's Michael Saylor EPIC ADVICE for CEOs: "Stop investing in toxic money. Just raise $100 million and buy Bitcoin." at Abundance360 Summit 2024 with Peter H. Diamandis, MD "The Microstrategy story is: We had $600 million enterprise value with $600 million cash - which is a liability. What do we do? We flip it to be $600 million Bitcoin and a $600 million enterprise." "And Bitcoin has been going up 40% a year... So you flip your balance sheet to be an asset, and today the enterprise value of the company is $30 billion." "The enterprise value is up by a factor of x40. It took 42 months... Not 40 years... I haven't graduated from my senior year of Bitcoin." #MichaelSaylor #Bitcoin $MSTR Strategy

Roger James Hamilton

13,197 views • 2 years ago

🔥 BULLISH: Tom Lee (Thomas (Tom) Lee (not drummer) FundstratDirect.com / Fundstrat Direct ) explains why $500K Bitcoin may be a conservative estimate. "If BTC is digital gold, $500K only puts it at half the value of gold. That might not take 5 years.”

🔥 BULLISH: Tom Lee (Thomas (Tom) Lee (not drummer) FundstratDirect.com / Fundstrat Direct ) explains why $500K Bitcoin may be a conservative estimate. "If BTC is digital gold, $500K only puts it at half the value of gold. That might not take 5 years.”

CoinDesk

205,912 views • 1 year ago

Should Strategy proactively sell Bitcoin now to protect shareholders later? Kaleo makes the case for selling, and gets pushback Kaleo: "Issuing MSTR is good here. If they were able to just unload a few billion dollars worth of Bitcoin and say the price didn't move way too much, we are being proactive. If they were able to sell that $1.25 billion of Bitcoin, that's bullish" "You're advocating for destroying shareholder value now to protect shareholder value in the future. Why would we be worried about Strategy being a forced seller if we're not worried about voluntarily selling now? That point I just don't get" Kaleo: "Where else is that 10 to 12 billion dollars coming from? They right now have talked about they are willing to sell the Bitcoin. If they sell some at a higher price, it eases a lot more of the concerns than if we get to 30k and we're in the same situation and they haven't sold any" "I can't get anyone to give me an answer on how much Bitcoin he can sell and why. You have no idea what would happen if he did that. What if he does it and Bitcoin goes to 30 and people are like we're done, he's out? You've destroyed more shareholder value than if Bitcoin just goes to 30, stays there 18 months, and he's forced to sell a couple billion. The most likely scenario is at some point in the next 12 months Bitcoin goes up enough that this isn't a problem"

Should Strategy proactively sell Bitcoin now to protect shareholders later? Kaleo makes the case for selling, and gets pushback Kaleo: "Issuing MSTR is good here. If they were able to just unload a few billion dollars worth of Bitcoin and say the price didn't move way too much, we are being proactive. If they were able to sell that $1.25 billion of Bitcoin, that's bullish" "You're advocating for destroying shareholder value now to protect shareholder value in the future. Why would we be worried about Strategy being a forced seller if we're not worried about voluntarily selling now? That point I just don't get" Kaleo: "Where else is that 10 to 12 billion dollars coming from? They right now have talked about they are willing to sell the Bitcoin. If they sell some at a higher price, it eases a lot more of the concerns than if we get to 30k and we're in the same situation and they haven't sold any" "I can't get anyone to give me an answer on how much Bitcoin he can sell and why. You have no idea what would happen if he did that. What if he does it and Bitcoin goes to 30 and people are like we're done, he's out? You've destroyed more shareholder value than if Bitcoin just goes to 30, stays there 18 months, and he's forced to sell a couple billion. The most likely scenario is at some point in the next 12 months Bitcoin goes up enough that this isn't a problem"

The Wolf Of All Streets

46,399 views • 1 month ago

Warren Buffett explains why he prefers productive assets over Bitcoin. He says he would gladly pay billions for a small share of U.S. farmland or apartments because they produce real value like food and housing. But even if he could buy all the Bitcoin in the world, he wouldn't take it, because it produces nothing and only has value if someone else pays more later. Buffett argues that Bitcoin is a speculative asset, not an investment, driven by hype, trading costs, and money changing hands rather than real wealth creation. In contrast, true assets must deliver something tangible over time. Bitcoin, he says, is speculation, not an investment: hype, fees, and money changing hands- without creating real wealth. True investments deliver tangible value over time.

Warren Buffett explains why he prefers productive assets over Bitcoin. He says he would gladly pay billions for a small share of U.S. farmland or apartments because they produce real value like food and housing. But even if he could buy all the Bitcoin in the world, he wouldn't take it, because it produces nothing and only has value if someone else pays more later. Buffett argues that Bitcoin is a speculative asset, not an investment, driven by hype, trading costs, and money changing hands rather than real wealth creation. In contrast, true assets must deliver something tangible over time. Bitcoin, he says, is speculation, not an investment: hype, fees, and money changing hands- without creating real wealth. True investments deliver tangible value over time.

Stocks World

27,526 views • 6 months ago

🔥 BULLISH: Florida’s candidate for governor Byron Donalds explains why he’s proposing a Florida Bitcoin reserve. "Bitcoin has proven to be a holder of value over the long term.”

🔥 BULLISH: Florida’s candidate for governor Byron Donalds explains why he’s proposing a Florida Bitcoin reserve. "Bitcoin has proven to be a holder of value over the long term.”

Cointelegraph

59,074 views • 1 year ago

I think eventually owning 0.1 BTC will be enough This is because Bitcoin is the only asset that can serve as a medium of exchange, unit of account, AND store of value Today, the functions of money are absorbed by 6+ asset classes On a Bitcoin standard, Bitcoin will be the only money, so it can grow MUCH bigger than the current financial system

I think eventually owning 0.1 BTC will be enough This is because Bitcoin is the only asset that can serve as a medium of exchange, unit of account, AND store of value Today, the functions of money are absorbed by 6+ asset classes On a Bitcoin standard, Bitcoin will be the only money, so it can grow MUCH bigger than the current financial system

Rajat Soni, CFA

24,812 views • 6 months ago

NEW: Blockstream CEO Adam Back told Bloomberg that Strategy's BTC sell proved that Bitcoin is liquid and there is no need to keep large cash reserves anymore 🤯 "It shows the market how to value Bitcoin" 🚀

NEW: Blockstream CEO Adam Back told Bloomberg that Strategy's BTC sell proved that Bitcoin is liquid and there is no need to keep large cash reserves anymore 🤯 "It shows the market how to value Bitcoin" 🚀

Bitcoin Magazine

180,699 views • 2 months ago

"How do you sell 1 Bitcoin and buy 10?" Saylor’s answer in simple terms: Strategyᴮ raises billions through STRC, buys Bitcoin with it, then only sells a tiny appreciated portion to cover dividends. Example: Raise $3.2B Buy $3.2B BTC Dividend cost = ~$80–90M So they’re effectively buying ~30 BTC for every 1 BTC sold. As long as BTC appreciates faster than ~2.3% annually, the engine keeps compounding.

"How do you sell 1 Bitcoin and buy 10?" Saylor’s answer in simple terms: Strategyᴮ raises billions through STRC, buys Bitcoin with it, then only sells a tiny appreciated portion to cover dividends. Example: Raise $3.2B Buy $3.2B BTC Dividend cost = ~$80–90M So they’re effectively buying ~30 BTC for every 1 BTC sold. As long as BTC appreciates faster than ~2.3% annually, the engine keeps compounding.

Alex 👽

166,303 views • 3 months ago

Buying a home as a store of value vs buying Bitcoin Here’s a lesson that cost me $3.8 Million Bitcoin is the greatest asset on earth, to ignore it would be crazy

Buying a home as a store of value vs buying Bitcoin Here’s a lesson that cost me $3.8 Million Bitcoin is the greatest asset on earth, to ignore it would be crazy

Wealth Squad Chris

156,532 views • 2 years ago

Public companies are destroying economic value of their shareholders by holding a large allocation to an asset that is guaranteed to devalue. Holding bitcoin on your balance sheet is contrarian today. Eventually it will be consensus. I explain to Squawk Box this morning.

Public companies are destroying economic value of their shareholders by holding a large allocation to an asset that is guaranteed to devalue. Holding bitcoin on your balance sheet is contrarian today. Eventually it will be consensus. I explain to Squawk Box this morning.

Anthony Pompliano 🌪

146,829 views • 1 year ago