Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨SCHOCKING: POLISH PUBLICIST MAREK CHODOROWSKI EXPOSES MASSIVE UKRAINIAN INFILTRATION IN POLAND — AGENT CONFESSES “I AM FIGHTING FOR UKRAINE HERE IN POLAND” WHILE NETWORKS MAP TARGETS, BUILD ELIMINATION LISTS & PREPARE PROVOCATIONS COORDINATED IN ZELENSKY’S LONDON MEETINGS WITH MI6, ROTHSCHILD FINANCIAL INTERESTS & CITY OF LONDON CIRCLES TO DESTABILIZE...

12,327 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Mykhailo Tkach, a journalist of Ukrainska Pravda media, went to the Polish border and conducted an investigation to find out the scale of trade turnover between Poland and Belarus. It turned out that while Ukrainian agricultural products are blocked at the border, Poland pays hundreds of millions to companies from Russia and Belarus for seeds, oil and animal feed. ▪️ Poland trades with Russia and Belarus, while Ukraine is banned even from transit. Ukrainian agricultural exports to Poland fell by 40% last year. In August, amid protests, Poland banned imports of wheat, corn, rapeseed and sunflower seeds from Ukraine, and in September, it added rapeseed cake and meal, corn bran, wheat flour and derivatives. Since April 2023, Ukrainian grain has been going through Poland only in transit. Despite this, protests at the border continue. There are about 6 thousand cars in line to leave Ukraine for Poland, and another 2 thousand to enter Poland Imports of agricultural products from Russia to Poland in 2023 reached $117 and exceeded the level of 2021, i.e. the level before the full-scale war. Poland purchased $55 million from Lukashenko, which also exceeds the profits of previous years. ▪️ "Disservice" to ourselves Poland not only continues to trade with the aggressor state and its satellite, but also increases imports of agricultural products. The situation already shows that the Poles have done a "disservice" to themselves, because Polish grain has been displaced by Russian grain on foreign markets. Russia, in turn, has increased its exports by stealing Ukrainian grain, among other things. ▪️ Playing on dislike of Ukrainians Some Polish pro-Russian politicians purposefully make Ukrainians public enemies. They are allegedly destroying the Polish economy and have allegedly been ungrateful in response to Poles' help after the Russian invasion. However, it is worth realizing that refusal to cooperate with Ukraine will deprive Polish farmers themselves of many opportunities. Polish companies that are already present on the Ukrainian market and those that could be on it will be left with nothing. 📹: Economic Pravda editor Dmytro Denkov

Anton Gerashchenko

489,944 views • 2 years ago

🚨BREAKING: POLISH MEP BRAUN: "NO POLISH MONEY FOR ARMING UKRAINE WHILE THEY HONOR BANDERA – LEADER LINKED TO WWII MASSACRES OF 100,000 POLES!" 🔥🇵🇱🇪🇺🇺🇦 Polish MEP Grzegorz Braun strongly condemns EU funding for Ukrainian arms, citing a new military-patriotic youth school in Lviv (western Ukraine) named after Stepan Bandera—a WWII Ukrainian nationalist whose followers carried out brutal mass killings of Polish civilians. - “I'm a Pole. I cannot accept spending my compatriots' money on arming people who cultivate the tradition of genocide.” – Grzegorz Braun, March 11, 2026 speech - “Ukrainians just opened a school in Lviv named after Bandera, who was responsible for Ukrainian genocide on Polish civilians.” – Braun, referring to the "Banderovets" school honoring Bandera - Bandera background (for global readers): During WWII (1943–1945), the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), linked to Bandera's faction, massacred up to 100,000 ethnic Poles (mostly women, children, elderly) in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia regions—acts Poland officially recognizes as genocide/ethnic cleansing with extreme brutality (axes, knives, burnings). Bandera is a hero in parts of Ukraine for fighting Soviets/Nazis but seen in Poland as tied to anti-Polish atrocities. Lviv is a major city in western Ukraine (historically Polish territory until after WWII). Recently, a youth school focused on military-patriotic education opened there named "Banderovets" after Stepan Bandera (1909–1959), a controversial Ukrainian nationalist leader. In Poland, Bandera is strongly associated with WWII mass killings: his followers in the UPA murdered tens of thousands of Polish civilians in 1943–1945 to ethnically cleanse areas for a future Ukraine. On March 11, 2026, Polish MEP Grzegorz Braun used this in a speech to argue against sending Polish/EU money to arm Ukraine, saying it supports people glorifying a "genocide tradition." This revives deep historical pain and tensions in Polish-Ukrainian relations amid the ongoing war.

Slavic Networks

10,909 views • 5 months ago

🚨 BREAKING | POLAND UNDER PRESSURE “There Is NO Reciprocity — And Washington Knows It” — Grzegorz Braun Says U.S. Envoy Warned Polish Right: Do Not Touch Him Polish MP Grzegorz Braun just dropped a political grenade. In a fiery speech, Braun claimed that the U.S. ambassador has allegedly warned right-wing politicians in Poland against any contact with him or cooperation with the Confederation of the Polish Crown — a move Braun describes not as an insult, but as confirmation he is dangerous to foreign interests. “There is no principle of reciprocity — and never has been — in Polish-Jewish, Polish-Israeli or Polish-American relations.” According to Braun, if the reports repeated by Jarosław Kaczyński are true, the message from Washington is clear: Polish politicians are expected to obey red lines drawn abroad. Braun’s response was openly defiant. He said the warning proves that U.S. political circles assume he would put Polish interests first — always — and pursue a sovereign policy without asking permission. In his words, that makes him unacceptable to those who believe they have the right to “remotely control the Polish political scene.” “No control from the East. No control from the West. No control from anywhere,” Braun declared. He went further — accusing Poland’s mainstream elites of failing the nation by reacting only after damage is done, while his movement warned in advance about: •the Ukrainization of Poland, •and the long-term consequences of pandemic authoritarianism. The implication is explosive: While Poland is officially a sovereign state, some actors behave as if Polish politics requires foreign approval — and Braun’s existence disrupts that assumption. Whether one agrees with him or not, the episode exposes a deeply uncomfortable question for Poland — and for Europe: Who is allowed to represent national interests… and who gets blacklisted for trying?

Slavic Networks

27,323 views • 6 months ago

Polish President Proposes Law Equating Bandera Symbols with Nazi and Communist Ones Polish President Karol Nawrocki has announced plans to amend Poland’s Criminal Code and the law on the Institute of National Remembrance, declaring that Bandera-era symbols of the OUN–UPA should be treated the same as Nazi and Communist ones. He made this statement while introducing his own draft law on citizenship. Let me remind you that in 1919 Ukraine, in alliance with Poland, defeated Soviet Russia, saving all of Europe, since Russia had launched a campaign towards Europe. Russia signed a peace treaty, which it violated the very same year by attacking Ukraine again (do you see the value of Russian peace treaties?). However, Poland betrayed Ukraine: by signing an alliance with Russia, Poland and Russia together attacked Ukraine – Russia from the east, and Poland from the west. Thus Poland occupied Lviv, while Russia occupied the rest of Ukraine, forcibly incorporating it into the USSR. Later, Russia divided its ally Poland with Nazi Germany, with whom it also began a war later (note again the “value” of Russia’s allies). Poland then disappeared from the world map as well, paying the price for betrayal and alliance with Russia. Later, both Ukraine and Poland were reborn. Ukraine fought on three fronts: against the Nazis, the Russians, and the Poles. This was logical, because all were occupiers. At that time, the concept of “war crimes” did not exist, and wars were waged by different methods. For example, Poles destroyed entire Ukrainian regions, massacring entire civilian populations. We have countless such tragedies – like the pacification in Eastern Galicia in 1930, when Polish authorities carried out punitive actions against Ukrainians, conducting mass searches in villages, destroying property, beating people, and closing Ukrainian schools and organizations, leading to dozens of deaths and thousands of arrests in the Lviv, Ternopil, and Stanislaviv voivodeships. Or the ethnic cleansings in Chełm and Nadsiannia in 1943–1944, where Polish partisans from the Home Army and Peasant Battalions attacked Ukrainian villages, as in Sahryn, where on March 10, 1944, they surrounded the village, killed 600–800 civilians, including women and children, and burned more than 150 houses. And of course, Operation Vistula in 1947, when Polish communist authorities forcibly deported about 141,000 Ukrainians from western Ukraine (which the USSR had handed over to Poland). Villages were surrounded, people were transported in cattle cars to western regions, 173 people were executed, thousands imprisoned in camps like Jaworzno, where hunger and torture reigned – all with the goal of eliminating support for the UPA and scattering Ukrainians to erase their identity in the Beskids, Nadsiannia, and other ethnic Ukrainian lands. Members of my own family were killed by Poles in these genocides, so these tragedies are not abstract to me. Streets in Poland today bear the names of leaders who carried out these genocides against Ukrainians, and monuments stand in their honor. Ukrainians have one case of revenge in the same manner – Volhynia. But already during World War II, Ukraine and Poland reconciled, and even the UPA and the Home Army fought side by side against Nazi and Russian occupiers. In 2004, Ukraine and Poland mutually apologized to each other. This topic was not raised. Russia tried to manipulate it, since Ukraine and Poland had become almost like brothers (more correctly, sisters, since our countries are feminine nouns), but unsuccessfully. Both Ukrainians and Poles viewed anyone who raised this topic as insane. In 2022 Russia began especially actively trying to pit neighbors against Ukraine. Fake news about refugees was spread, Russian agents in neighboring countries campaigned against “Ukrainization.” With Poland, Russia heavily pushed the topic of the Volhynian tragedy. This was useful for Russia because in Volhynia both Poles killed Ukrainians and Ukrainians killed Poles – it is a painful subject for both nations. Poland and Ukraine agreed not to raise historical issues until the end of the war. But this agreement was broken… Polish politicians, even at the level of Duda, Tusk, and Sikorski, began to regularly raise these topics. They even declared that without resolving these issues, they would block Ukraine’s entry into the EU. Recently, the Polish parliament passed a law to recognize our patriotic and military movements of World War II as criminal, insultingly referring to western Ukraine as “eastern Lesser Poland.” Then came a clear provocation at a concert of a Belarusian singer who had already been boycotted by nationalists in Ukraine even before the war because he is pro-Moscow. Are we to believe that nationalists in Poland came to the concert of a pro-Russian singer? Clearly, it was a staged provocation – but the question remains whether it was staged by Russians or by Poles themselves, since they now try to justify their anti-Ukrainian policy. The newly elected president of Poland continues this policy, but he had already done so before, as he headed the Polish Institute of National Remembrance and integrated Russian fakes into Polish history – copying Russian propaganda about “Ukrainian Nazis,” about blaming only Ukraine, exaggerating the number of victims 5–10 times, and even forgetting that Volhynia is Ukraine (was and is). What were Poles even doing on Ukrainian territory? Why could wartime enemies reconcile, but today’s “allies” themselves provoke conflict? In whose interests is this? Ukraine in alliance with Poland has defeated Russia countless times: for example, during the Time of Troubles in Muscovy 1605–1618, when Polish-Lithuanian forces together with Ukrainian Cossacks under Petro Sahaidachny captured Moscow, occupying the Kremlin in 1610 and forcing the tsar to sign the Truce of Deulino in 1618, ceding lands to the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and weakening Muscovite influence; or in the Battle of Konotop in 1659, when Hetman Ivan Vyhovsky, after the Treaty of Hadiach with Poland, crushed a 100,000-strong Muscovite army together with Tatar allies, killing up to 30,000 enemies and forcing Moscow to retreat temporarily from Left-Bank Ukraine; or in the Polish-Russian war of 1660–1667 during the Ruin, when Right-Bank hetmans like Pavlo Teteria, allied with the Poles, won local victories, such as at Chudniv in 1660, where Polish-Cossack forces defeated the Muscovite army, captured its commander, and forced Moscow to sign the Treaty of Chudniv, renouncing claims to Ukraine – although the war ended with the Andrusovo Truce dividing lands; and finally, in the Polish-Ukrainian war against Bolshevik Russia 1919–1921, when the UNR of Symon Petliura under the Warsaw Agreement of 1920, together with Poland under Józef Piłsudski, liberated Kyiv in May 1920 and crushed the Red Army in the Battle of Warsaw that August, the famous “Miracle on the Vistula,” where allied forces destroyed more than 100,000 enemies, saving Europe from a Bolshevik advance and forcing Russia to sign the Treaty of Riga in 1921 – though Poland later betrayed Ukraine, dividing the lands. And whenever we quarreled – we lost independence. So think carefully what you are doing and for what purpose! We can defeat Russia, liberate Belarus, fully eliminate future threats, and live peacefully and develop together. Ukrainian refugees in Poland are not a threat, because Poles themselves go to Germany as migrant workers. Ukraine’s success will be Poland’s success. All economic experts say that all of Ukraine’s neighbors will experience economic growth after Ukraine joins the EU, and the number of refugees will decrease as Ukraine’s economy grows. I don’t understand why you need this conflict? Ukraine is a proud nation and we will not renounce our heroes, just as you do not renounce yours. We understand that this is your history, so we are not outraged when you honor the Home Army and others. Why then are you provoked by the UPA and Bandera, who had nothing to do with these events, since he was imprisoned in a Nazi concentration camp from the beginning of the war (incidentally, he was imprisoned with Poles and befriended them)? And UPA commander Roman Shukhevych promoted friendship and reconciliation with Poles – he strongly criticized the events in Volhynia, and you could know this if you opened historical archives. Friendship, love – this is the future. Enmity, fear – this is decline. Which path do you choose? P.S. By the way, Karol Nawrocki also vetoed the law to extend aid to Ukrainians at the same time. Fine gifts for Ukraine’s Independence Day. Donald Tusk Ministry of Foreign Affairs 🇵🇱 Radosław Sikorski 🇵🇱🇪🇺 Kancelaria Prezydenta RP - konto archiwalne Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський Andriy Yermak Andrii Sybiha 🇺🇦

Devana 🇺🇦

11,020 views • 11 months ago

🚨 BREAKING NEWS | ZELENSKY ARRIVES IN WARSAW — MASSIVE SECURITY, CIVIC DISRUPTION, POLITICAL TURMOIL 🇵🇱🇺🇦 Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has arrived in Warsaw, Poland, in a visit marked by high-level talks, extraordinary security measures, and growing controversy over political tensions inside Poland itself. Videos from the capital show: •🚓 long police and security motorcades •🚧 major road closures and blocked intersections •🚗 traffic paralyzed for kilometers •👮‍♂️ heavy security presence across central Warsaw This is more than a diplomatic visit — it has become a focal point for political conflict inside Poland and beyond. ⸻ 🇺🇦 Official Agenda Zelensky’s visit is described by Polish and international media as an official state visit, during which he will meet with: •Polish President Karol Nawrocki •Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk to discuss security cooperation, economic ties, EU and NATO support, and continued backing for Ukraine against Russian aggression. (📌 Kyiv Independent) ⸻ ⚠️ The Real Controversy — Tension Between Nawrocki & Tusk According to Wprost, Zelensky’s visit has exposed deep political friction in Warsaw: 👉 There is a **visible dispute between President Karol Nawrocki and Prime Minister Donald Tusk over how to handle support for Ukraine and Poland’s strategic direction. •Nawrocki represents a more nationalist, conservative faction with a focus on sovereignty and historical identity. •Tusk leads a more pro-EU, integrationist government. During preparations for Zelensky’s arrival, these two leaders reportedly clashed publicly behind closed doors, highlighting a division within the government on how far Poland should go in aligning with EU policies and international commitments. (📌 Wprost) This undercurrent of political rivalry means Zelensky’s visit is not just about Ukraine — it’s exacerbating factional conflict inside Warsaw’s leadership itself. ⸻ 🟡 Public Backlash in Poland There are growing questions among ordinary Poles: •Why is critical infrastructure being shut down for high-profile visits? •Why should ordinary citizens be interrupted for elite diplomacy? •Is Warsaw acting in Poland’s interests — or in alignment with external pressures? These frustrations come at a time when Poland is already: •carrying a huge load of military and economic support for Ukraine •hosting millions of Ukrainian refugees •experiencing public fatigue and domestic social tensions ⸻ 🚨 Political Divide Over Support for Ukraine Zelensky’s arrival highlights a wider controversy in Europe: 1.National vs. supranational priorities Should Poland prioritize its own citizens’ interests first — especially during economic stress — or continue deep military and financial backing of Ukraine? 2.Internal leadership disagreement The N awrocki-Tusk divide reflects a deeper split in Polish politics over foreign policy direction. 3.Public vs. elite perception Many Poles feel real daily life concerns (traffic disruptions, public safety, economy) are being ignored in favor of international symbolism. ⸻ 🔥 Europe’s Broader Dilemma Zelensky’s visit to Warsaw is happening as: •EU leaders are negotiating multi-billion-euro support for Ukraine •Peace and security plans shift amid war fatigue •Citizens across the EU express growing skepticism about long-term involvement This visit — and the political friction surrounding it — may well signal a turning point in European support for Ukraine, where domestic interests begin to collide openly with diplomatic commitments. ⸻ If you like what we are doing — like, share, subscribe, and invite your friends for more. Follow us also on Facebook: Slavic Networks Nirali VVeles SlavicFreeSpirit

Slavic Networks

127,490 views • 7 months ago

🇺🇦🔥🇵🇱🚨 “Ukrainian ambassador shocks Poland: ‘Banderyzm is a myth – your real enemy is Russia’” Ukraine’s ambassador to Poland, Vasyl Bodnar, has ignited a storm of reactions after bluntly dismissing Polish concerns about “Banderyzm,” calling it an invented threat and insisting that Poland should focus on what he describes as the real danger – Russia. Speaking on OficjalneZero Kanał Zero in an interview conducted by journalist Arleta Bojke Arleta Bojke, Bodnar tackled some of the most painful and sensitive topics in Polish-Ukrainian relations: Stepan Bandera, the red-and-black flag, historical memory, and the Volhynia massacres. From the very beginning, the ambassador questioned the Polish narrative. “I don’t fully understand why Bandera is presented so clearly as both a hero and a threat to Poland,” Bodnar said. According to him, in Ukraine the view is “simple”: Bandera is seen primarily as a figure who fought Russia and sought Ukrainian independence. The same logic, he argued, applies to figures such as Roman Shukhevych and other wartime leaders. “Different history, different meaning” Bodnar stressed that Ukraine and Poland interpret history through completely different experiences. Symbols that provoke outrage in Poland do not carry the same meaning in Ukraine. The controversial red-and-black flag, associated with Ukrainian nationalist movements, is one such example. “It has a different meaning for us than for you,” he said, adding that many Polish reactions are hard to understand for Ukrainian society. “There is no cult of Bandera” The ambassador firmly rejected claims that modern Ukraine promotes any form of Bandera cult or nationalist ideology. “There is no such thing as Banderyzm. Ukraine has no state ideology – the constitution forbids it.” He pointed out that: •Ukraine currently has no nationalist parties in parliament •The party Svoboda is no longer represented •Poland actually has more right-wing parties than Ukraine For Bodnar, “Banderyzm” is an artificial term used in political debate rather than a real movement. “Speak the language of facts, not invented threats,” he urged. Who are today’s heroes? Bodnar argued that Ukraine’s future will not be shaped by historical figures from World War II, but by modern soldiers: • those who died defending the country • those currently fighting at the front “They will shape Ukraine’s future – not people from the past.” “The real threat is Russia” The most controversial moment came when Bodnar openly named what he considers Poland’s true enemy: “The real threat must be Russia – a threat both physical and hybrid.” Not Bandera. Not nationalist symbols. Not historical memory. A wound that never healed For many Poles, this interview reopened deep historical trauma. The Volhynia massacres, where tens of thousands of Polish civilians were killed by UPA units during World War II, remain one of the darkest chapters in regional history. Critics accuse Kyiv of: • downplaying crimes • avoiding responsibility • rewriting history While Bodnar called for academic dialogue between historians, many Poles see the issue as moral, not academic. A diplomatic fault line This interview exposes a growing crack in Polish-Ukrainian relations: Different heroes. Different memories. Different narratives. What Ukraine sees as an independence struggle, Poland remembers as ethnic cleansing. And neither side is willing to fully step back. ⸻ If you like what we are doing — like, share, subscribe, and invite your friends for more. Follow us also on Facebook: Slavic Networks Nirali VVeles SlavicFreeSpirit #Ukraine #Poland #Bandera #Volhynia #Bodnar #KanałZero #HistoryWars #SlavicNetworks #BreakingNews #UPA

Slavic Networks

24,168 views • 7 months ago