Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 SCIENTISTS CREATED THE WORLD'S FIRST SELF REPLICATING SYNTHETIC LIFE FORM — AND PEOPLE ARE FREAKING OUT This sounds like the plot of a science fiction movie. It isn't. A team of scientists spent roughly 15 years and $40 million creating what they described as the world's first self...

HustleBitch_'s profile picture

HustleBitch

334,041 subscribers

16,030 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Scientists have created “the first synthetic species” after 15 years of research costing $40 million dollars It’s a bacteria designed on a computer that “gets its genetic instructions from a synthetic chromosome made by man, not nature, and it's alive. It's alive and self-replicating. It means it can indefinitely grow and make copies of itself.” “Venter believes this is the first baby step in a biological revolution, one in which it will be possible to custom design and reprogram bacteria — DNA is the software of life” This work is considered a foundational milestone in synthetic biology, allegedly proving life could be engineered from scratch
2:01

Scientists have created “the first synthetic species” after 15 years of research costing $40 million dollars It’s a bacteria designed on a computer that “gets its genetic instructions from a synthetic chromosome made by man, not nature, and it's alive. It's alive and self-replicating. It means it can indefinitely grow and make copies of itself.” “Venter believes this is the first baby step in a biological revolution, one in which it will be possible to custom design and reprogram bacteria — DNA is the software of life” This work is considered a foundational milestone in synthetic biology, allegedly proving life could be engineered from scratch

Wall Street Apes

206,224 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

"This is the first synthetic species,” microbiologist J. Craig Venter told 60 Minutes’ Steve Kroft in 2010. His team of scientists created a synthetic bacteria designed on a computer, with man-made DNA. Venter says that from concept to completion, it took 15 years and $40 million to make. Venter, who died this week at 79, was one of the most famous scientists in the world, known for his pioneering work in deciphering the human genetic code.
2:00

"This is the first synthetic species,” microbiologist J. Craig Venter told 60 Minutes’ Steve Kroft in 2010. His team of scientists created a synthetic bacteria designed on a computer, with man-made DNA. Venter says that from concept to completion, it took 15 years and $40 million to make. Venter, who died this week at 79, was one of the most famous scientists in the world, known for his pioneering work in deciphering the human genetic code.

60 Minutes

92,402 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨‼️ BILL GATES FUNDS FIRST MAN MADE SYNTHETIC BACTERIA THAT CAN DESTROY MANKIND After 15 years and 40 million dollars from Bill Gates, scientists have crossed the ultimate line. They created the FIRST SYNTHETIC SPECIES. A bacteria designed entirely on a computer with a synthetic chromosome built by humans, not nature. It is alive. It is self replicating. It grows and makes copies of itself indefinitely. Venter called it the first baby step in a biological revolution where we can custom design and reprogram bacteria. DNA is the software of life, he said. This is allegedly a foundational milestone proving life can be engineered from scratch. While everyone was distracted by vaccines and climate scares, Gates poured millions into rewriting the code of existence itself. Why does the man obsessed with depopulation now get to play God and create new organisms? Synthetic bacteria that can be programmed for anything. Fuels? Sure. But what else can these man made microbes be instructed to do once released? This is not progress. This is the elite seizing control of biology itself. Patented life. Designer microbes. The end of natural creation. The resistance must go ON CHAIN. Follow and support DNA Protocol fighting this madness with decentralized, transparent DNA technology before they patent and control all life. WAKE UP.
2:01

🚨‼️ BILL GATES FUNDS FIRST MAN MADE SYNTHETIC BACTERIA THAT CAN DESTROY MANKIND After 15 years and 40 million dollars from Bill Gates, scientists have crossed the ultimate line. They created the FIRST SYNTHETIC SPECIES. A bacteria designed entirely on a computer with a synthetic chromosome built by humans, not nature. It is alive. It is self replicating. It grows and makes copies of itself indefinitely. Venter called it the first baby step in a biological revolution where we can custom design and reprogram bacteria. DNA is the software of life, he said. This is allegedly a foundational milestone proving life can be engineered from scratch. While everyone was distracted by vaccines and climate scares, Gates poured millions into rewriting the code of existence itself. Why does the man obsessed with depopulation now get to play God and create new organisms? Synthetic bacteria that can be programmed for anything. Fuels? Sure. But what else can these man made microbes be instructed to do once released? This is not progress. This is the elite seizing control of biology itself. Patented life. Designer microbes. The end of natural creation. The resistance must go ON CHAIN. Follow and support DNA Protocol fighting this madness with decentralized, transparent DNA technology before they patent and control all life. WAKE UP.

Stern Drew

320,632 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Your DNA is like a computer program according to Blaise Agüera (@blaiseaguera.bsky.social). Von Neumann figured this out before scientists even discovered how DNA works -- that for anything to make a copy of itself, it needs: * Instructions (the code/DNA) * A machine to read those instructions (ribosomes) * A "photocopier" for the instructions (DNA polymerase) Blaise reckons that your cells are running actual computations to build proteins and replicate i.e. life is "software" running on hardware.
6:45

Your DNA is like a computer program according to Blaise Agüera (@blaiseaguera.bsky.social). Von Neumann figured this out before scientists even discovered how DNA works -- that for anything to make a copy of itself, it needs: * Instructions (the code/DNA) * A machine to read those instructions (ribosomes) * A "photocopier" for the instructions (DNA polymerase) Blaise reckons that your cells are running actual computations to build proteins and replicate i.e. life is "software" running on hardware.

Machine Learning Street Talk

15,794 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Stephen Meyer explaining why the discovery of the structure of DNA presented an unexpected challenge to the atheistic worldview: "What's really fun is that Francis Crick was a codebreaker in World War II and he ended up breaking the ultimate code. The irony is that Crick and Watson were also strict scientific materialists. They were atheists and they were looking for the material basis for life, and they thought they found it in 1953 until Crick realized it's not just a molecule. It's a molecule that contains code. And that discovery ends up being foundational. It provides evidence of what we're going to call Intelligent Design. And it has created a complete impass in evolutionary theory. People cannot account for the origin of the information needed to build the first life or subsequent forms of life... Even though Watson and Crick were looking for the material foundation for life, what they actually found was something more like software. And Bill Gates has said that DNA is like a computer program but far more advanced than ever any we've ever created."
3:05

Stephen Meyer explaining why the discovery of the structure of DNA presented an unexpected challenge to the atheistic worldview: "What's really fun is that Francis Crick was a codebreaker in World War II and he ended up breaking the ultimate code. The irony is that Crick and Watson were also strict scientific materialists. They were atheists and they were looking for the material basis for life, and they thought they found it in 1953 until Crick realized it's not just a molecule. It's a molecule that contains code. And that discovery ends up being foundational. It provides evidence of what we're going to call Intelligent Design. And it has created a complete impass in evolutionary theory. People cannot account for the origin of the information needed to build the first life or subsequent forms of life... Even though Watson and Crick were looking for the material foundation for life, what they actually found was something more like software. And Bill Gates has said that DNA is like a computer program but far more advanced than ever any we've ever created."

Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker

14,033 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

A group of orcas was captured on camera engaging in what scientists call "ram-to-fragment" behavior. One whale holds a large sunfish and lets go just before another rams it at high speed, pulverizing the fish into thousands of pieces. In a new study, scientists say the behavior could be a clever way to feed the young, a form of play, or a combination of both.
0:28

A group of orcas was captured on camera engaging in what scientists call "ram-to-fragment" behavior. One whale holds a large sunfish and lets go just before another rams it at high speed, pulverizing the fish into thousands of pieces. In a new study, scientists say the behavior could be a clever way to feed the young, a form of play, or a combination of both.

ABC7 Eyewitness News

32,306 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A group of orcas was captured on camera engaging in what scientists call "ram-to-fragment" behavior. One whale holds a large sunfish and lets go just before another rams it at high speed, pulverizing the fish into thousands of pieces. In a new study, scientists say the behavior could be a clever way to feed the young, a form of play, or a combination of both. Read more:
0:26

A group of orcas was captured on camera engaging in what scientists call "ram-to-fragment" behavior. One whale holds a large sunfish and lets go just before another rams it at high speed, pulverizing the fish into thousands of pieces. In a new study, scientists say the behavior could be a clever way to feed the young, a form of play, or a combination of both. Read more:

ABC News

16,908,074 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

BREAKING: Gates Foundation Funds First-Ever Creation of 16 Synthetic Viruses Using AI For the first time ever, mad scientists used AI models to design entire viral genomes, physically manufacture them, and turn them into 16 new functional viruses capable of replicating. Project leader Brian Hie, who conceived, designed, and supervised the research, disclosed funding from the Gates Foundation. They used Evo 1 and Evo 2, genomic language models that essentially function like ChatGPT for DNA, predicting nucleotides instead of words and writing complete viral genetic blueprints. Bioterrorists no longer need to imagine a future in which AI can design pathogens from genetic code... the foundational capability has now been revealed in a major scientific journal. AI viral genome design technology should be halted before it falls into the hands of bioterrorists or other criminal actors.
1:36

BREAKING: Gates Foundation Funds First-Ever Creation of 16 Synthetic Viruses Using AI For the first time ever, mad scientists used AI models to design entire viral genomes, physically manufacture them, and turn them into 16 new functional viruses capable of replicating. Project leader Brian Hie, who conceived, designed, and supervised the research, disclosed funding from the Gates Foundation. They used Evo 1 and Evo 2, genomic language models that essentially function like ChatGPT for DNA, predicting nucleotides instead of words and writing complete viral genetic blueprints. Bioterrorists no longer need to imagine a future in which AI can design pathogens from genetic code... the foundational capability has now been revealed in a major scientific journal. AI viral genome design technology should be halted before it falls into the hands of bioterrorists or other criminal actors.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

106,317 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

🚨 Jensen Huang says everyone panicked about the AI data when MOST training data was never REAL to begin with. Ilya Sutskever told the industry pre-training was over. "Ilya said, 'We're out of data,' or something like that. 'Pre-training is over,' or something like that," Huang says. "The industry panicked, you know, that this is the end of AI." "And of course, of course that's obviously not true. We're gonna keep on scaling the amount of data that we have to train with." "A lot of that data is probably gonna be synthetic." That's where the panic came from — synthetic data sounds like cheating. "Most of the data that we are training, that we teach each other with, inform each other with, is synthetic." "It's synthetic because it didn't come out of nature." "You created it. I'm consuming it. I modify it, augment it, I regenerate it, somebody else consumes it." The textbook in your hand is synthetic. The post you're reading is synthetic. The lecture you took is synthetic. Nature didn't make any of it. Humans did. AI just learned to do the same thing — faster. "Training is now limited by compute," Huang says. "Data is now limited by compute." The data wall wasn't a wall. It was a mirror. If you're new here, follow @AiEvolutio for the latest on ChatGPT, Claude, and the AI tools shaping how we work and create. — Jensen Huang ( NVIDIA ), NVIDIA CEO, on Lex Fridman's ( Lex Fridman ) podcast
1:29

🚨 Jensen Huang says everyone panicked about the AI data when MOST training data was never REAL to begin with. Ilya Sutskever told the industry pre-training was over. "Ilya said, 'We're out of data,' or something like that. 'Pre-training is over,' or something like that," Huang says. "The industry panicked, you know, that this is the end of AI." "And of course, of course that's obviously not true. We're gonna keep on scaling the amount of data that we have to train with." "A lot of that data is probably gonna be synthetic." That's where the panic came from — synthetic data sounds like cheating. "Most of the data that we are training, that we teach each other with, inform each other with, is synthetic." "It's synthetic because it didn't come out of nature." "You created it. I'm consuming it. I modify it, augment it, I regenerate it, somebody else consumes it." The textbook in your hand is synthetic. The post you're reading is synthetic. The lecture you took is synthetic. Nature didn't make any of it. Humans did. AI just learned to do the same thing — faster. "Training is now limited by compute," Huang says. "Data is now limited by compute." The data wall wasn't a wall. It was a mirror. If you're new here, follow @AiEvolutio for the latest on ChatGPT, Claude, and the AI tools shaping how we work and create. — Jensen Huang ( NVIDIA ), NVIDIA CEO, on Lex Fridman's ( Lex Fridman ) podcast

AI Evolution

15,565 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

How Can Scientists Best Become Founders? david friedberg answers a fan question from James Sinka - Boston & SF: "I think the biggest challenge that scientists face when trying to build businesses is shifting from a research and discovery mindset to a product and customer mindset." this can be really hard for scientists, because absolute truth doesn't rule the day in startups like it does in science example: "You have to listen to customers who sometimes might not want the most rational or the most obvious thing." "Iterating your business to find product-market fit is the necessary role of a founder. But it's often different than the scientific process of discovering absolute truth." so, how can scientists overcome this hurdle to become great founders? change their framing, and use the scientific method as a strength: "One way scientists can be successful is to think about product-market fit as a discovery process, and using the iterative and scientific method to try and get to that." "I have seen scientists shift to (an) engineering mindset, using the scientific method to try and find product-market fit."
0:54

How Can Scientists Best Become Founders? david friedberg answers a fan question from James Sinka - Boston & SF: "I think the biggest challenge that scientists face when trying to build businesses is shifting from a research and discovery mindset to a product and customer mindset." this can be really hard for scientists, because absolute truth doesn't rule the day in startups like it does in science example: "You have to listen to customers who sometimes might not want the most rational or the most obvious thing." "Iterating your business to find product-market fit is the necessary role of a founder. But it's often different than the scientific process of discovering absolute truth." so, how can scientists overcome this hurdle to become great founders? change their framing, and use the scientific method as a strength: "One way scientists can be successful is to think about product-market fit as a discovery process, and using the iterative and scientific method to try and get to that." "I have seen scientists shift to (an) engineering mindset, using the scientific method to try and find product-market fit."

The All-In Podcast

65,259 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

This is the Existence Grid. It was inspired by the idea of seeing your entire life laid out in weeks. How much you have created and how much you still have to create. The grid is designed to show your life in years, months, weeks, and days. Not just as time passing, but as time created. For me, that is 51 years, 618 months, 2,686 weeks, and 18,802 days. It all began with one time block. June 28th, 1974 at 6:50am. The first block of my existence. This grid becomes the record of what you have created. The true story of you. Learn more about Existence here:
1:53

This is the Existence Grid. It was inspired by the idea of seeing your entire life laid out in weeks. How much you have created and how much you still have to create. The grid is designed to show your life in years, months, weeks, and days. Not just as time passing, but as time created. For me, that is 51 years, 618 months, 2,686 weeks, and 18,802 days. It all began with one time block. June 28th, 1974 at 6:50am. The first block of my existence. This grid becomes the record of what you have created. The true story of you. Learn more about Existence here:

Rob Dyrdek

99,739 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨EPSTEIN FILES STATE THE CREATED NEANDERTHALS CLONES Clones of Neanderthals were created in underground tunnels as stated in the Epstein files released by the DOJ government in 2026. It is impossible to ignore the truth at this point. The truth is stranger than fiction and we have not heard anything stranger than this happening in real life. Per Charlie T Griffen The first studies of Neanderthal DNA focused on the genetic sequences of mitochondria, the microscopic organelles that convert food to energy within cells. In 2005, however, 454 began a collaborative project with the Max Planck Institute in Leipzig, Germany, to sequence the full genetic code of a Neanderthal woman who died in Croatia's Vindija cave 30,000 years ago. As the Neanderthal genome is painstakingly sequenced, the archaeologists and biologists who study it will be faced with an opportunity that seemed like science fiction just 10 years ago. They will be able to look at the genetic blueprint of humankind's nearest relative and understand its biology as intimately as our own. In addition to giving scientists the ability to answer questions about Neanderthals' relationship to our own species--did we interbreed, are we separate species, who was smarter--the Neanderthal genome may be useful in researching medical treatments. Newly developed techniques could make cloning Neanderthal cells or body parts a reality within a few years. The ability to use the genes of extinct hominins is going to force the field of paleoanthropology into some unfamiliar ethical territory. There are still technical obstacles, but soon it could be possible to use that long-extinct genome to safely create a healthy, living Neanderthal clone. Should it be done? At the 454 Life Sciences offices, Gerald Irzyk, Jason Affourtit, and Thomas Jarvie explain the process they use to read the chemicals that made up Neanderthal DNA and the genes that determined a large part of their biology. DNA has a shape, called a double helix, that makes it look like a twisted ladder. Each rung on the ladder is called a base-pair. The rungs are made up of a pair of chemicals called nucleotides--adenine, thymine, cytosine, and guanine, which are usually referred to by their first initials. The sequence of the nucleotides in the DNA determines what genes an organism has and how they function. Max Planck Institute initially chose 454 because it had come up with a way to read hundreds of thousands of DNA sequences at a time. Genome-sequencing technology is advancing at a rate comparable to computer processing power. Putting the fragments themselves in order can be a little tricky. "At first glance, it's just this completely random assemblage of As, Ts, Cs, and Gs," says Irzyk. "But it turns out there are patterns and motifs, and sometimes these are very specific to a group of organisms." For the Neanderthal sample, the human and chimpanzee genomes were used as references for checking the sequence. Working with ancient DNA can be much more problematic than sequencing genetic material from living species. Within hours of death, cells begin to break down in a process called apoptosis. The dying cells release enzymes that chop up DNA into tiny pieces. In a human cell, this means that the entire three-billion-base-pair genome is reduced to fragments a few hundred base-pairs long or shorter. The DNA also goes through chemical changes that alter the nucleotides as it ages--C changes into T, and G turns into A--which can cause the gene sequence to be interpreted incorrectly. In the case of the Neanderthal sample, somewhere between 90 and 99 percent of the DNA came from bacteria and other contaminants that had found their way into the bone as it sat in the ground and in storage. The contaminant DNA has to be identified and eliminated. Given the similarity between Neanderthal and modern human DNA, this can be especially difficult when the contamination comes from the people who excavated or analyzed the bone.
2:28

🚨EPSTEIN FILES STATE THE CREATED NEANDERTHALS CLONES Clones of Neanderthals were created in underground tunnels as stated in the Epstein files released by the DOJ government in 2026. It is impossible to ignore the truth at this point. The truth is stranger than fiction and we have not heard anything stranger than this happening in real life. Per Charlie T Griffen The first studies of Neanderthal DNA focused on the genetic sequences of mitochondria, the microscopic organelles that convert food to energy within cells. In 2005, however, 454 began a collaborative project with the Max Planck Institute in Leipzig, Germany, to sequence the full genetic code of a Neanderthal woman who died in Croatia's Vindija cave 30,000 years ago. As the Neanderthal genome is painstakingly sequenced, the archaeologists and biologists who study it will be faced with an opportunity that seemed like science fiction just 10 years ago. They will be able to look at the genetic blueprint of humankind's nearest relative and understand its biology as intimately as our own. In addition to giving scientists the ability to answer questions about Neanderthals' relationship to our own species--did we interbreed, are we separate species, who was smarter--the Neanderthal genome may be useful in researching medical treatments. Newly developed techniques could make cloning Neanderthal cells or body parts a reality within a few years. The ability to use the genes of extinct hominins is going to force the field of paleoanthropology into some unfamiliar ethical territory. There are still technical obstacles, but soon it could be possible to use that long-extinct genome to safely create a healthy, living Neanderthal clone. Should it be done? At the 454 Life Sciences offices, Gerald Irzyk, Jason Affourtit, and Thomas Jarvie explain the process they use to read the chemicals that made up Neanderthal DNA and the genes that determined a large part of their biology. DNA has a shape, called a double helix, that makes it look like a twisted ladder. Each rung on the ladder is called a base-pair. The rungs are made up of a pair of chemicals called nucleotides--adenine, thymine, cytosine, and guanine, which are usually referred to by their first initials. The sequence of the nucleotides in the DNA determines what genes an organism has and how they function. Max Planck Institute initially chose 454 because it had come up with a way to read hundreds of thousands of DNA sequences at a time. Genome-sequencing technology is advancing at a rate comparable to computer processing power. Putting the fragments themselves in order can be a little tricky. "At first glance, it's just this completely random assemblage of As, Ts, Cs, and Gs," says Irzyk. "But it turns out there are patterns and motifs, and sometimes these are very specific to a group of organisms." For the Neanderthal sample, the human and chimpanzee genomes were used as references for checking the sequence. Working with ancient DNA can be much more problematic than sequencing genetic material from living species. Within hours of death, cells begin to break down in a process called apoptosis. The dying cells release enzymes that chop up DNA into tiny pieces. In a human cell, this means that the entire three-billion-base-pair genome is reduced to fragments a few hundred base-pairs long or shorter. The DNA also goes through chemical changes that alter the nucleotides as it ages--C changes into T, and G turns into A--which can cause the gene sequence to be interpreted incorrectly. In the case of the Neanderthal sample, somewhere between 90 and 99 percent of the DNA came from bacteria and other contaminants that had found their way into the bone as it sat in the ground and in storage. The contaminant DNA has to be identified and eliminated. Given the similarity between Neanderthal and modern human DNA, this can be especially difficult when the contamination comes from the people who excavated or analyzed the bone.

SANTINO

54,154 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Demis Hassabis reveals the 100,000-person synthetic country that took years to hand-code, and says AI may now generate it "We tried to simulate a whole country with 100,000 living, breathing people sort of going about their daily lives and all the politics of it" "And you were supposed to create a revolution" "So it was a pretty ambitious game that we had to write by hand" "And what's amazing now, and it took years" "But what's amazing now is that we might be close to this possibility of actually just sort of generating that" The leap is not better graphics. It is the cost curve of simulation: from years of hand-coding one world to asking a model to generate it. That turns synthetic societies from bespoke software projects into a reusable AI primitive. - Demis Hassabis (Demis Hassabis), CEO of Google DeepMind, at Semafor Tech
0:26

Demis Hassabis reveals the 100,000-person synthetic country that took years to hand-code, and says AI may now generate it "We tried to simulate a whole country with 100,000 living, breathing people sort of going about their daily lives and all the politics of it" "And you were supposed to create a revolution" "So it was a pretty ambitious game that we had to write by hand" "And what's amazing now, and it took years" "But what's amazing now is that we might be close to this possibility of actually just sort of generating that" The leap is not better graphics. It is the cost curve of simulation: from years of hand-coding one world to asking a model to generate it. That turns synthetic societies from bespoke software projects into a reusable AI primitive. - Demis Hassabis (Demis Hassabis), CEO of Google DeepMind, at Semafor Tech

Karl Mehta

80,754 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Dr. Rose explained that this new “vaccine” pushes mRNA technology even further. The modified code doesn’t just tell the body to produce the spike protein—it instructs it to build the nanoparticle structure itself, a synthetic framework that could fundamentally change how genetic material behaves inside human cells. She warned that while it may sound like cutting-edge science, it opens a Pandora’s box of biological questions. What happens when the body begins assembling foreign scaffolds at a cellular level? To Jessica Rose 🤙, it is unmistakable proof that biotech has crossed yet another line before ever addressing the damage from the first. Watch the full interview: 👇
2:49

Dr. Rose explained that this new “vaccine” pushes mRNA technology even further. The modified code doesn’t just tell the body to produce the spike protein—it instructs it to build the nanoparticle structure itself, a synthetic framework that could fundamentally change how genetic material behaves inside human cells. She warned that while it may sound like cutting-edge science, it opens a Pandora’s box of biological questions. What happens when the body begins assembling foreign scaffolds at a cellular level? To Jessica Rose 🤙, it is unmistakable proof that biotech has crossed yet another line before ever addressing the damage from the first. Watch the full interview: 👇

Vigilant Fox 🦊

11,511 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

On the latest episode of Revelations, Jason Cammisa looks back on the life of the Tesla Model S, one of, if not the most influential car of all time. Tesla's first sedan wasn't perfect. But it was an industry game-changer not (just) because it was electric. Not (just) because it was from a startup. Not (just) because it set the stage for the company to create the world's bestselling passenger car. But because it was created using Silicon Valley-style continual iteration. Tesla never stopped improving the Model S — rolling in hundreds, or even thousands, of running changes during its production: both hardware and software. In the end, it shares merely 3% of its parts with the original 2012 Model S, roughly equivalent to 60 years of progress at a traditional automaker. Watch Now:
1:36

On the latest episode of Revelations, Jason Cammisa looks back on the life of the Tesla Model S, one of, if not the most influential car of all time. Tesla's first sedan wasn't perfect. But it was an industry game-changer not (just) because it was electric. Not (just) because it was from a startup. Not (just) because it set the stage for the company to create the world's bestselling passenger car. But because it was created using Silicon Valley-style continual iteration. Tesla never stopped improving the Model S — rolling in hundreds, or even thousands, of running changes during its production: both hardware and software. In the end, it shares merely 3% of its parts with the original 2012 Model S, roughly equivalent to 60 years of progress at a traditional automaker. Watch Now:

Hagerty

56,480 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Scientists Shocked: Peer-Reviewed Paper Confirms COVID Vaccine Nightmare A bombshell peer-reviewed study has confirmed what the “conspiracy theorists” have been warning for years: Pfizer’s mRNA COVID shot is contaminated with not just bacterial plasmid DNA, but with the SV40 promoter, a viral sequence that may interfere with how your genes function or even become part of your DNA. Dr. Mikolaj Raszek of Merogenomics reviewed the paper and said, “We finally have it—the very first published scientific evidence showing that the mRNA vaccine, Pfizer vaccines, were contaminated with bacterial plasmid DNA.” Researchers tested sealed vials—both monovalent and bivalent—and found DNA fragments embedded within the lipid nanoparticles. That's important because these nanoparticles are designed to deliver genetic material directly into the body’s cells. So the DNA wasn’t just contamination—it was effectively delivered like a package. Raszek pointed out that the fragments included the SV40 enhancer, which he called “extremely dangerous.” This viral promoter can help foreign DNA enter the nucleus of human cells, raising the risk of accidental genome integration. In plain English: fragments from the vaccine could potentially alter your DNA. How did this happen? What did Pfizer know beforehand? Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH joins the show with to discuss.
13:50

Scientists Shocked: Peer-Reviewed Paper Confirms COVID Vaccine Nightmare A bombshell peer-reviewed study has confirmed what the “conspiracy theorists” have been warning for years: Pfizer’s mRNA COVID shot is contaminated with not just bacterial plasmid DNA, but with the SV40 promoter, a viral sequence that may interfere with how your genes function or even become part of your DNA. Dr. Mikolaj Raszek of Merogenomics reviewed the paper and said, “We finally have it—the very first published scientific evidence showing that the mRNA vaccine, Pfizer vaccines, were contaminated with bacterial plasmid DNA.” Researchers tested sealed vials—both monovalent and bivalent—and found DNA fragments embedded within the lipid nanoparticles. That's important because these nanoparticles are designed to deliver genetic material directly into the body’s cells. So the DNA wasn’t just contamination—it was effectively delivered like a package. Raszek pointed out that the fragments included the SV40 enhancer, which he called “extremely dangerous.” This viral promoter can help foreign DNA enter the nucleus of human cells, raising the risk of accidental genome integration. In plain English: fragments from the vaccine could potentially alter your DNA. How did this happen? What did Pfizer know beforehand? Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH joins the show with to discuss.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

303,171 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr