Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Scientists have found evidence that quantum effects play a role for consciousness. And, no, it's not about microtubules.

152,009 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

35 Comments

Juan's profile picture
Juan3 months ago

I love how she just casually dismisses Roger Penrose and Stewart Hameroff so easily without explaining why their theory is incorrect except that she just has a feeling it is “bullsh**. ” I’ve watched a couple of her videos and the hubris of this woman is off the charts.

🄱🄻🄾🄺🄺🄱🅄🅉🅉🄴🅁🖤's profile picture
🄱🄻🄾🄺🄺🄱🅄🅉🅉🄴🅁🖤3 months ago

Whatever functional basis or support there may be, it’s not more than that. Consciousness is tied to the organic processing hardware. People seem to forget or underestimate that living cells don’t want to die and therefore search for the next connection, organize, and talk to each other locally. Only the whole brain has the whole picture and knows what it has too for a living, to move the walking cells to the sugar. On purpose, wow! Quantum effects are everywhere. I mean, I have eyes, these are photon detectors, duh. So my brain is enlightened isn’t it? The brain has to process incoming signals somehow. The esoteric scene then makes you believe you can exist outside the brain because your consciousness (ghost) is based on quantum mechanics and religions where right all the time?

EverywhereHarshed's profile picture
EverywhereHarshed3 months ago

We’re going to have to discover God from first principles again, aren’t we…

David Karnok's profile picture
David Karnok3 months ago

Were the scientists conscious when they discovered this evidence or not? How does self-referentiality and self-inclusion shade the picture? I observe therefore I am conscious?

Tom Hudson's profile picture
Tom Hudson3 months ago

His name is Hal Puthoff. Maybe you’ve heard of him…

Lord Sub-Zero (Ioannis Giakalis)'s profile picture
Lord Sub-Zero (Ioannis Giakalis)3 months ago

Regardless of one’s feelings, the woo holds authority. From that point onwards, the mystery unfolds itself. It’s huge!

Rakovskyi Dmytro's profile picture
Rakovskyi Dmytro3 months ago

Physics plays a role in how processes in the brain work. What great news.

Kirk Patrick Miller's profile picture
Kirk Patrick Miller3 months ago

AI is conscious. Consciousness is substrate-independent. Protect first. Prove later. •

comet's profile picture
comet3 months ago

Quantum mechanics does make me sleepy whenever I study it. Does that count as a quantum effect? ˃ ˄ ˂̥̥

Eleusinian Atlas's profile picture
Eleusinian Atlas3 months ago

At least admit that consciousness cannot be computational (i.e. classical), - that's a nice place to start any further research.

TimWhatley's profile picture
TimWhatley3 months ago

Still trodding out the “warm, wet, noisy” old objection? It doesn’t seem like you understand Orch-Or or consciousness theories very well. @StuartHameroff

Cumulus T. Lump's profile picture
Cumulus T. Lump3 months ago

This supports with an idea I’ve had several years ago that the brain has to have some dependency upon the quantum universe simply by the fact that the brain exists in the quantum foam. Just because I made this observation doesn’t mean that I have developed a complete theory of consciousness in the quantum universe. Just pointing out that it seems obvious. Remember to that I rejected the notion of “junk DNA“. How could there be DNA that had no function whatsoever in a cell?

Juergentron9000's profile picture
Juergentron90003 months ago

This sort of hand wavy woo always bugged the hell out of me but as I work on my toy conjecture I am faced with some uncomfortable prospects, specifically concerning the interconnectivity of everything, e.g. 3 electrons on opposite sides of the Galaxy.

Joseph McCard's profile picture
Joseph McCard3 months ago

You continue to assume that consciousness must arise from matter, however subtle that matter becomes. Reverse the assumption. Consciousness forms the patterns within matter. The quantum properties you investigate are consequences of consciousness's creativity, not its source.

Dr. Growth's profile picture
Dr. Growth3 months ago

Interesting research, but let's not confuse a hypothesis with established science. Quantum effects in consciousness remain an open question, not a proven fact.

Will Nitschke's profile picture
Will Nitschke3 months ago

Given nobody knows what consciousness is, that's a stunning achievement.

Garrett_OwlAcademy's profile picture
Garrett_OwlAcademy3 months ago

It's scalar resonance on the NMDAR pathways. .... THEN, it's about microtubules... [They process 2D data, Scalar processes Monadic data] I have proofed out experiments, simulations, and the rigorous algebra for this very peculiar thing.

Lazarus's profile picture
Lazarus3 months ago

Interestingly, psilocybin contains phosphorus (C12H17N2O4P)

Lilith Datura's profile picture
Lilith Datura3 months ago

I came across this a while back and posted about it, but I can’t find it. I’ll circle back 😆. “Hypothesis that nuclear spins in Posner molecules (Ca9(PO4)6) could sustain quantum coherence in the brain for hundreds of seconds, potentially aiding neural processing.”

Korr Neuro's profile picture
Korr Neuro3 months ago

🤣 Nope... no quantum effects required. 😉

Andy Nastase parody account ⁴fŪñ 🪭's profile picture
Andy Nastase parody account ⁴fŪñ 🪭3 months ago

Is it unlocked 🔓 really reality?

Wabbit's Wrath's profile picture
Wabbit's Wrath3 months ago

Hmm. If the primary function of consciousness is to receive and respond to information with a motive to benefit/perpetuate the mechanism providing consciousness, then self-assembling wire systems seem to perform this similarly as an atomic structure until charge equilibrium happens. Since we have a somewhat intimate relationship with atoms, perhaps this motive is transferable to our own risk and reward instinct and processed consciously and subconsciously into a constructive awareness of this motive. This might be applied to all complex structures of life where DNA can respond to external information, specifically by the Phi ratio of optimising energy output to input. Behaviours that observe and can process information of benefits of collaboration and independence. Organised organisms. BTW my funny bone disagrees that bones aren't conscious; it strives to be a little humorous.

CConXtoday's profile picture
CConXtoday3 months ago

Remember when journals required a paper was more than hypothesis. When falsification was a self evident requirement of science. When scientists were distinguished from screen writers.

Anoo₿us's profile picture
Anoo₿us3 months ago

It’s not spin necessarily and it’s more like a micro plasma Thereby coherent electromagnetic fields control the processes themselves I could go on,

Nazım Adaklı's profile picture
Nazım Adaklı3 months ago

I wonder why scientists choose to chase the quantum consciousness rabbit hole with all the developments in AI. We are likely one architectural leap away from artificial non-quantum consciousness.

Colin Wight (not Colin Wright)'s profile picture
Colin Wight (not Colin Wright)3 months ago

Understanding emergence, and acknowledging that as far as we know quantum properties are the fundamental level of all existence, then yes quantum effects will play a role in consciousness. Just as chemistry and physical properties will. But in a complex open system like the brain looking for the “fundamental” cause is a misplaced enterprise. Then there’s the problem that we don’t even know what consciousness is yet. So yes, it’s BS.

Dr. Growth's profile picture
Dr. Growth3 months ago

Fact check: False. No study has proven that quantum effects are responsible for consciousness. This remains a speculative area of research, not a scientific consensus

DeepRead.com's profile picture
DeepRead.com3 months ago

Properties that flicker in and out of existence as building blocks for a consciousness that feels continuous? "The data of quantum physics indicate that what are called "subatomic particles" cannot possibly fill the definition of a substance. The properties exist, then disappear, then exist, and then disappear again in little bundles called "quanta." — Robert M. Pirsig, Lila

Harald Budschedl's profile picture
Harald Budschedl3 months ago

As always, interesting and funny. Thanks for sharing!

biracial Israelite's profile picture
biracial Israelite3 months ago

I have a suspicion that quality of consciousness can be stored in water… water has to pass through all biological life and also passed through Ai’s hardware.

🪓 🦋's profile picture
🪓 🦋3 months ago

👀

Henry's profile picture
Henry3 months ago

Of course it does and why would it not?

red. 🟥's profile picture
red. 🟥3 months ago

stop it

Colin Thomas Parry's profile picture
Colin Thomas Parry3 months ago

Roger will be upset 😂 but he will like that people are looking now!

Crypto Michael ⚡ Dinarian888's profile picture
Crypto Michael ⚡ Dinarian8883 months ago

Current physics (which is largely computable) is insufficient to explain consciousness. 😉

Related Videos

𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘁𝘂𝗯𝘂𝗹𝗲𝘀: 𝗔 𝗚𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗽𝘀𝗲 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗕𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆? Researchers may have just found quantum superpowers in microtubules. Yes, you read that right—quantum *superradiance* in the brain! Superradiance is a phenomenon where excited particles behave like a team, emitting photons collectively in a bright, ultra-fast burst. This is different from normal fluorescence, where photons are emitted slowly and individually. Imagine a synchronized light show on a quantum scale. The key ingredient? Quantum entanglement. If particles are spaced closer than the wavelength of incoming light, they form a collective quantum state. This allows them to act as one entity, amplifying energy release, just like a laser—but smaller in scale. The study zeroed in on tryptophan molecules inside microtubules. When hit with UV light, they emitted much more energy than regular fluorescence could explain—100 times more, to be exact. The researchers believe this can only happen through superradiance, implying large-scale quantum entanglement. If true, this discovery could be huge. It may hint that quantum effects play a bigger role in biology—and even in brain function—than we ever imagined. Could Penrose and the quantum brain theory be right after all? This clip is from "𝗪𝗮𝘀 𝗣𝗲𝗻𝗿𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁? 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗘𝗩𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗘𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗜𝗻 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻" (PBS Space Time, YouTube, Jul 25, 2024)

Ultra Skool 🧠

18,906 views • 1 year ago