Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Scientists in China solved a modern problem using a 7,000 year-old idea. They needed to build sturdy, dependable structures at nano level, too small to use any kind of tiny fastener. Then they remembered how ancient Chinese engineers could create furniture and even buildings without nails or glue –...

NuryVittachi's profile picture

Nury Vittachi

47,262 subscribers

39,377 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von 𝓕𝓾𝓻𝓻𝔂 𝓟𝓾𝓹𝓹𝔂 𝓟𝓪𝔀𝓼
𝓕𝓾𝓻𝓻𝔂 𝓟𝓾𝓹𝓹𝔂 𝓟𝓪𝔀𝓼vor 1 Jahr

This is fascinating

Profilbild von Austin Scholar
Austin Scholarvor 2 Jahren

The secret to kids learning faster and better has been known since 1960. But it’s been impossible to implement. Technology is just starting to catch up, so we can finally use what we’ve known for years to radically change how we educate kids. Want to learn how? Read this:

Profilbild von JoannaHeredia
JoannaHerediavor 1 Jahr

Fascinating how ancient wisdom solves modern challenges! @alexgraytrust’s insights on blending innovation with timeless principles have been so helpful—whether in markets or tech. Always a reminder that the best ideas sometimes stand the test of time!

Profilbild von brandon kim
brandon kimvor 1 Jahr

has the mortise-and-tenon joint patent expire yet

Profilbild von Self-sufficiency and degrowth.
Self-sufficiency and degrowth.vor 1 Jahr

Wow, my alma mater ❤️

Profilbild von Salli Zack
Salli Zackvor 1 Jahr

👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

Profilbild von Andujar
Andujarvor 1 Jahr

@CapitaineIb226

Profilbild von Global News 24/7
Global News 24/7vor 1 Jahr

Yes

Profilbild von direccion cinco
direccion cincovor 1 Jahr

Wonder at what point modern humans are going to accept that we are the least evolved form of humanity that has ever existed.

Ähnliche Videos

What would you build if execution wasn’t the bottleneck? Ideas are the spark for something new. They should not be held back by technical constraints or the need to build a team before you can even start. Build It Now is a new initiative built around a simple premise: how quickly can an idea become a working application using CreateOS? Over the coming weeks, we’ll speak with people in cities like San Francisco, New York, Bangalore, Rome, Delhi, and Dubai and ask a direct question: if you could see one idea live today, what would it be? Using CreateOS, we’ll work alongside them as they build in real time and document the process openly. Each episode follows one idea from concept to live application. CreateOS lowers the barrier to starting. This series is an open invitation to build, share what you create, and bring others into the process. #BuildItNow #CreateOS #AI #BuildInPublic
1:19

What would you build if execution wasn’t the bottleneck? Ideas are the spark for something new. They should not be held back by technical constraints or the need to build a team before you can even start. Build It Now is a new initiative built around a simple premise: how quickly can an idea become a working application using CreateOS? Over the coming weeks, we’ll speak with people in cities like San Francisco, New York, Bangalore, Rome, Delhi, and Dubai and ask a direct question: if you could see one idea live today, what would it be? Using CreateOS, we’ll work alongside them as they build in real time and document the process openly. Each episode follows one idea from concept to live application. CreateOS lowers the barrier to starting. This series is an open invitation to build, share what you create, and bring others into the process. #BuildItNow #CreateOS #AI #BuildInPublic

CreateOS

27,766 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Elon Musk explains how data centers in Space could help the US compete with China in AI “Given that Chinese AI companies are doing as well as they are with a relatively small amount of compute, it seems that if they had a lot of compute, there’s a good chance they would be the leaders. The constraints on AI are essentially electricity and AI chips. China is very strong in digital AI, and it has far more electricity than the United States. In fact, China already has more electricity than the United States, Europe and India combined. The US government can prevent US companies from using Chinese models, but it can’t stop the rest of the world from using them. That won’t stop China from becoming the leader in AI. Digital intelligence comes down to how much AI compute, how many chips and how much electricity you have. The current constraint is electricity outside China. In China, the constraint is chips. China is also closer than most people realize to solving the lithography problem, which would enable it to make AI chips in very large volumes. Once we address the power constraint with AI data centers in space, the constraint will once again be chips outside China.”
4:51

Elon Musk explains how data centers in Space could help the US compete with China in AI “Given that Chinese AI companies are doing as well as they are with a relatively small amount of compute, it seems that if they had a lot of compute, there’s a good chance they would be the leaders. The constraints on AI are essentially electricity and AI chips. China is very strong in digital AI, and it has far more electricity than the United States. In fact, China already has more electricity than the United States, Europe and India combined. The US government can prevent US companies from using Chinese models, but it can’t stop the rest of the world from using them. That won’t stop China from becoming the leader in AI. Digital intelligence comes down to how much AI compute, how many chips and how much electricity you have. The current constraint is electricity outside China. In China, the constraint is chips. China is also closer than most people realize to solving the lithography problem, which would enable it to make AI chips in very large volumes. Once we address the power constraint with AI data centers in space, the constraint will once again be chips outside China.”

DogeDesigner

244,339 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

Culture is genetic because behavior is genetic. This beaver never saw a dam in its life. No beavers or anything else ever taught it to build a dam. It wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Many beavers together build a big dam. That is beaver culture. Humans are not different. Nothing is different. This is what life is. This is how life works. Your body is your mind. A caterpillar wants to build a chrysalis. A bee wants to build a hive. A lion wants to build a pride. You are not special. You are not above your nature. you are INSIDE of it. The thoughts that we think are genetic thoughts. The crimes we commit are genetic crimes. The art we create is genetic art. Just like this beaver, you can give the animal different sticks and it will build a different dam, but it will always build a dam. And you can give humans different "education," but the human will always use it to do what its genes tell it to do. This is the first big answer that you need. This is the biggest piece of the puzzle. This is how to understand people 90% of the way. You just... notice what they do, and get out of the way, and watch them do it. And if they need sticks, you give them sticks. And if you don't like what they do, you have to get away from them. You cannot train dam-building into them or out of them any more than you can with a beaver. A beaver wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Whatever you see people build, that's what they wanted to build from the sticks they got in the river they were in. Stop pretending you can change it.
0:59

Culture is genetic because behavior is genetic. This beaver never saw a dam in its life. No beavers or anything else ever taught it to build a dam. It wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Many beavers together build a big dam. That is beaver culture. Humans are not different. Nothing is different. This is what life is. This is how life works. Your body is your mind. A caterpillar wants to build a chrysalis. A bee wants to build a hive. A lion wants to build a pride. You are not special. You are not above your nature. you are INSIDE of it. The thoughts that we think are genetic thoughts. The crimes we commit are genetic crimes. The art we create is genetic art. Just like this beaver, you can give the animal different sticks and it will build a different dam, but it will always build a dam. And you can give humans different "education," but the human will always use it to do what its genes tell it to do. This is the first big answer that you need. This is the biggest piece of the puzzle. This is how to understand people 90% of the way. You just... notice what they do, and get out of the way, and watch them do it. And if they need sticks, you give them sticks. And if you don't like what they do, you have to get away from them. You cannot train dam-building into them or out of them any more than you can with a beaver. A beaver wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Whatever you see people build, that's what they wanted to build from the sticks they got in the river they were in. Stop pretending you can change it.

hoe_math = PsychoMath

1,189,824 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Bill DeWitt Jr.: "We do what we think is best for the team, current and future. ... You have big markets that are just going to do what they do, and we're not in a position to compete at that kind of level of payroll. ... There's a time to do it and a time to build." #STLCards
1:05

Bill DeWitt Jr.: "We do what we think is best for the team, current and future. ... You have big markets that are just going to do what they do, and we're not in a position to compete at that kind of level of payroll. ... There's a time to do it and a time to build." #STLCards

Joey Schneider

23,729 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The teenager who built Oculus VR in his garage, and sold it to Facebook for $2 billion, talks about the most uncomfortable argument about American manufacturing. "You cannot divorce innovation from the act of manufacturing. You make the stuff, that's where the innovation takes place." "We were not teaching engineers how to be engineers anymore. We're teaching them how to be high-level design shops that put together a design package that gets sent to the real engineers in China, and they actually figure out how to do the work." "They don't get 50% more for their dollar. They get like 10x for their dollar. Things that here would take a million dollars, you do there for $50,000, $100,000." "Their people are just genuinely extremely good. They have the world's best battery engineers, many of the world's best metallurgists, many of the world's best optical engineers." "The largest laptop manufacturer for the Pentagon is Lenovo, which is owned by China. Their headquarters has a flagpole with the CCP party flag and then the Lenovo logo under it. It's nuts." PS. Follow us Metav3rse for latest news on emerging technology and internet culture.
3:12

The teenager who built Oculus VR in his garage, and sold it to Facebook for $2 billion, talks about the most uncomfortable argument about American manufacturing. "You cannot divorce innovation from the act of manufacturing. You make the stuff, that's where the innovation takes place." "We were not teaching engineers how to be engineers anymore. We're teaching them how to be high-level design shops that put together a design package that gets sent to the real engineers in China, and they actually figure out how to do the work." "They don't get 50% more for their dollar. They get like 10x for their dollar. Things that here would take a million dollars, you do there for $50,000, $100,000." "Their people are just genuinely extremely good. They have the world's best battery engineers, many of the world's best metallurgists, many of the world's best optical engineers." "The largest laptop manufacturer for the Pentagon is Lenovo, which is owned by China. Their headquarters has a flagpole with the CCP party flag and then the Lenovo logo under it. It's nuts." PS. Follow us Metav3rse for latest news on emerging technology and internet culture.

Metav3rse

121,735 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

.Palmer Luckey: American companies don't actually have engineers anymore. "American companies have been hollowed out." "We're not teaching engineers how to be engineers anymore." "We're not teaching designers how to actually design things to be manufactured." "We're teaching them how to be high-level design shops that put together a design package, that gets sent to the real engineers in China—and they actually figure out how to do the work." "People are turning into architecture astronauts." "They pick components, and they put them in a nominal layout." "But the real work of—how am I actually going to put this together? How am I going to build a manufacturing line to make this? How am I going to need to figure out how to do the one, two, three, four, five different revisions of this board to pass radio emissions and interference standards? That's all done in China. So they are the real engineers." Via Hoover Institution
3:12

.Palmer Luckey: American companies don't actually have engineers anymore. "American companies have been hollowed out." "We're not teaching engineers how to be engineers anymore." "We're not teaching designers how to actually design things to be manufactured." "We're teaching them how to be high-level design shops that put together a design package, that gets sent to the real engineers in China—and they actually figure out how to do the work." "People are turning into architecture astronauts." "They pick components, and they put them in a nominal layout." "But the real work of—how am I actually going to put this together? How am I going to build a manufacturing line to make this? How am I going to need to figure out how to do the one, two, three, four, five different revisions of this board to pass radio emissions and interference standards? That's all done in China. So they are the real engineers." Via Hoover Institution

Jawwwn

1,090,652 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

An old man is remembering the situation of the Muslims of Jalandhar and how they were killed in 1947 in Indian Punjab. He witnessed the deaths of at least 10k Muslims with his own eyes, in which all Muslim girls, men, children, and the elderly, from a one-day-old baby to a 70-year-old man, were stripped naked, their hands tied, lined up in lines, and one by one their necks were cut and thrown into the Beas River. If anyone wanted to rape a Muslim girl or woman, they would be taken to the trees, raped, and then killed.
1:40

An old man is remembering the situation of the Muslims of Jalandhar and how they were killed in 1947 in Indian Punjab. He witnessed the deaths of at least 10k Muslims with his own eyes, in which all Muslim girls, men, children, and the elderly, from a one-day-old baby to a 70-year-old man, were stripped naked, their hands tied, lined up in lines, and one by one their necks were cut and thrown into the Beas River. If anyone wanted to rape a Muslim girl or woman, they would be taken to the trees, raped, and then killed.

Mr.Haque

51,200 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

Just read a neat AI paper called SAMURAI -- it takes SAM 2 (Meta's "segment anything" model) and makes it way better at tracking objects in videos. Basic problem is SAM 2 gets confused when things move fast or there's a crowd of similar objects (big problem for VFX and video intelligence alike). The fix? They basically gave it a sense of motion and smarter memory selection using our old friend the Kalman filter -- helps it remember where things were going instead of just where they are. No retraining needed and runs in realtime. Elegant solution that matches (and even beats!) a lot of purpose built tracking systems. Nice example of how sometimes you don't need fancy new architectures -- just smart ways to use what the model already knows, plus some tried & tested classical methods. Every time someone's like "we solved tracking!" I check the methods section and... yep, there's our boy Kalman, still crushing it after all these years. Sometimes the old school stuff just works.
0:27

Just read a neat AI paper called SAMURAI -- it takes SAM 2 (Meta's "segment anything" model) and makes it way better at tracking objects in videos. Basic problem is SAM 2 gets confused when things move fast or there's a crowd of similar objects (big problem for VFX and video intelligence alike). The fix? They basically gave it a sense of motion and smarter memory selection using our old friend the Kalman filter -- helps it remember where things were going instead of just where they are. No retraining needed and runs in realtime. Elegant solution that matches (and even beats!) a lot of purpose built tracking systems. Nice example of how sometimes you don't need fancy new architectures -- just smart ways to use what the model already knows, plus some tried & tested classical methods. Every time someone's like "we solved tracking!" I check the methods section and... yep, there's our boy Kalman, still crushing it after all these years. Sometimes the old school stuff just works.

Bilawal Sidhu

47,246 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇺🇸🇨🇳 KEVIN O’LEARY: CHINA IS BEATING THE U.S. IN THE AI RACE - U.S. IS TOO SLOW TO COMPETE WITH CHINA Kevin O’Leary just sounded the alarm: China is running laps around the U.S. in artificial intelligence, and it’s not because they’re smarter, it’s because they move faster. While America spends 7 years stuck in permits to build anything, China builds massive AI data centers in 11 months because the government just says “do it” and it happens. He says China knows AI = power. “They are kicking our high knees in advancing AI. They basically say, let’s put down a 1.4 gig facility right here. Build it in the next 11 months. We got to go through 7 years of permitting in North America. The U.S. is stuck dragging its feet while China stacks chips, data, and control of the future. They're going to use it for economic dominance and military dominance.” Source: Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful One Nation with Brian Kilmeade Fox News
0:41

🇺🇸🇨🇳 KEVIN O’LEARY: CHINA IS BEATING THE U.S. IN THE AI RACE - U.S. IS TOO SLOW TO COMPETE WITH CHINA Kevin O’Leary just sounded the alarm: China is running laps around the U.S. in artificial intelligence, and it’s not because they’re smarter, it’s because they move faster. While America spends 7 years stuck in permits to build anything, China builds massive AI data centers in 11 months because the government just says “do it” and it happens. He says China knows AI = power. “They are kicking our high knees in advancing AI. They basically say, let’s put down a 1.4 gig facility right here. Build it in the next 11 months. We got to go through 7 years of permitting in North America. The U.S. is stuck dragging its feet while China stacks chips, data, and control of the future. They're going to use it for economic dominance and military dominance.” Source: Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful One Nation with Brian Kilmeade Fox News

Mario Nawfal

119,661 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

This American bought a vacant lot at an auction from the city of Trenton, Ohio to build a home The city decided they want it back so they assessed the property value lower than what he bought it for and are using eminent domain to take the land back US Government in action
2:06

This American bought a vacant lot at an auction from the city of Trenton, Ohio to build a home The city decided they want it back so they assessed the property value lower than what he bought it for and are using eminent domain to take the land back US Government in action

Wall Street Apes

201,854 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Broadcom's CEO just told investors that one senior engineer with Claude Opus can do in one week what ten engineers earning $300,000 a year take three months to produce. Every engineering org in the world is running the wrong headcount math. This was not a prediction. It was a report from inside Broadcom. Hock Tan said his engineers are already using Claude Opus for engineering design and code assistance. Not experimenting with it. Using it. And the output they are getting from a single senior engineer in one week is equivalent to what a team of ten would produce over three months. Do that math slowly. Ten engineers at $300,000 a year is $3 million in annual salary. Three months of their time is $750,000 of labor. One engineer with Claude Opus produces the same result in one week. He also said something that most people in the room let slide past them. The engineers who get good at these tools do not just get faster. They get better. The designs they produce with AI assistance are probably better than what they would produce without it. That is the part nobody wants to say out loud. It was never just about speed. The ceiling on what a single engineer can produce just moved. And the teams that have not figured that out yet are spending $750,000 to do what one person with the right tools can do for a fraction of that. What do you guys think about this? (Watch the full interview at Bloomberg Live on YouTube)
1:15

Broadcom's CEO just told investors that one senior engineer with Claude Opus can do in one week what ten engineers earning $300,000 a year take three months to produce. Every engineering org in the world is running the wrong headcount math. This was not a prediction. It was a report from inside Broadcom. Hock Tan said his engineers are already using Claude Opus for engineering design and code assistance. Not experimenting with it. Using it. And the output they are getting from a single senior engineer in one week is equivalent to what a team of ten would produce over three months. Do that math slowly. Ten engineers at $300,000 a year is $3 million in annual salary. Three months of their time is $750,000 of labor. One engineer with Claude Opus produces the same result in one week. He also said something that most people in the room let slide past them. The engineers who get good at these tools do not just get faster. They get better. The designs they produce with AI assistance are probably better than what they would produce without it. That is the part nobody wants to say out loud. It was never just about speed. The ceiling on what a single engineer can produce just moved. And the teams that have not figured that out yet are spending $750,000 to do what one person with the right tools can do for a fraction of that. What do you guys think about this? (Watch the full interview at Bloomberg Live on YouTube)

Ihtesham Ali

97,145 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

THEY MADE IT A SUBWAY IN 3.5 HOURS! In Japan, 1,200 workers accomplished something that sounds impossible: they converted an above-ground train track into an underground subway line in just 3.5 hours! Imagine this challenge: You have a train track that runs on the surface of the ground, and you need to move it underground so trains can travel through a tunnel instead. Normally, this kind of construction project would take months or even years. But in Japan, a massive team of workers, engineers, and construction crews worked together like a perfectly synchronized machine to do it in one night - specifically, in just 3 hours and 30 minutes!
1:22

THEY MADE IT A SUBWAY IN 3.5 HOURS! In Japan, 1,200 workers accomplished something that sounds impossible: they converted an above-ground train track into an underground subway line in just 3.5 hours! Imagine this challenge: You have a train track that runs on the surface of the ground, and you need to move it underground so trains can travel through a tunnel instead. Normally, this kind of construction project would take months or even years. But in Japan, a massive team of workers, engineers, and construction crews worked together like a perfectly synchronized machine to do it in one night - specifically, in just 3 hours and 30 minutes!

Brian Roemmele

116,628 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

A for Almajiri Education is the foundation of any functioning economy, and Nigerians are some of the most intelligent people in other countries but with most out of school children on planet earth. As a basic human right, it is the responsibility of the whole society to not only advocate for modern curriculums that have practical and realistic value in sustaining the economy of that society in the future, but to hold their leaders accountable when they don’t invest the appropriate resources and relevance into education. This is the reason why Almajiri still exists today in 21st century, while religious education and modern education can be attained together using curriculums that are realistic and set a foundation for the future of the students and their society. Today, I taught my primary 2 students how to make a PPT using iPads. Giving presentations and using smart devices are now common in professional work places and it’s important that start giving my kids those skill sets at a young age. It will build their work ethic, confidence, realistic expectations in life and navigate them to seamlessly fit into any professional environment they find themselves in now and the future. An important teaching approach I use here is to show them less of how to do it, and just throw them into the situation to see how they can find their ways and create solutions. Only when they need help is when we show them how to do it. It makes them used to problem solving, resilience, less likely to be lazy and dependent. They themselves will be strong to initiate tackling an unknown problem and develop confidence and humility in asking for help or knowledge when they need it. Nigeria needs proper budget allocation for education and modern/designed curriculums that are useful to students and the country in the future. Vote for leaders who will enthusiastically execute these policies. If they don’t, impeach them and take any necessary action against them because they are not only destroying your economic future, but your children’s future as well. This is my idea. What must be done to fix education in Nigeria? Let’s hear from you in the comment section.
1:11

A for Almajiri Education is the foundation of any functioning economy, and Nigerians are some of the most intelligent people in other countries but with most out of school children on planet earth. As a basic human right, it is the responsibility of the whole society to not only advocate for modern curriculums that have practical and realistic value in sustaining the economy of that society in the future, but to hold their leaders accountable when they don’t invest the appropriate resources and relevance into education. This is the reason why Almajiri still exists today in 21st century, while religious education and modern education can be attained together using curriculums that are realistic and set a foundation for the future of the students and their society. Today, I taught my primary 2 students how to make a PPT using iPads. Giving presentations and using smart devices are now common in professional work places and it’s important that start giving my kids those skill sets at a young age. It will build their work ethic, confidence, realistic expectations in life and navigate them to seamlessly fit into any professional environment they find themselves in now and the future. An important teaching approach I use here is to show them less of how to do it, and just throw them into the situation to see how they can find their ways and create solutions. Only when they need help is when we show them how to do it. It makes them used to problem solving, resilience, less likely to be lazy and dependent. They themselves will be strong to initiate tackling an unknown problem and develop confidence and humility in asking for help or knowledge when they need it. Nigeria needs proper budget allocation for education and modern/designed curriculums that are useful to students and the country in the future. Vote for leaders who will enthusiastically execute these policies. If they don’t, impeach them and take any necessary action against them because they are not only destroying your economic future, but your children’s future as well. This is my idea. What must be done to fix education in Nigeria? Let’s hear from you in the comment section.

Dan Bello

170,009 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Palmer Luckey admits he rips off weapons ideas from hundreds of years ago all the time, something a clever weapons designer should do. "Because we live now, I can go back in time and in many cases it's well documented. Why did they abandon this project? What was the problem with it?" "And sometimes I say, well, that's not a problem at all anymore. There's absolutely no problem." "So if you're trying to be a clever weapons designer, you want to go into the past and bring it back to the future, and just, I rip off ideas from hundreds of years ago all the time. All the time."
0:21

Palmer Luckey admits he rips off weapons ideas from hundreds of years ago all the time, something a clever weapons designer should do. "Because we live now, I can go back in time and in many cases it's well documented. Why did they abandon this project? What was the problem with it?" "And sometimes I say, well, that's not a problem at all anymore. There's absolutely no problem." "So if you're trying to be a clever weapons designer, you want to go into the past and bring it back to the future, and just, I rip off ideas from hundreds of years ago all the time. All the time."

Fireside Alpha

45,092 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

Ye’s wife describing archaeoacoustics as the study of sound in ancient caves and how early humans may have used resonance to shape experience. “It’s called archaeoacoustics and basically they went into ancient caves and saw how humans interacted with those caves and carved the caves and then they were using their voice to resonate frequencies and they were all playing at 110 hertz and basically what I was doing to the language part of the brain is they were feeling like they were having a transcendental experience or an experience with one with God and I think to have an interaction directly with nature you could push it further by like setting those types of things of like how you can actually carve those spaces and create different sensory experiences.”
0:46

Ye’s wife describing archaeoacoustics as the study of sound in ancient caves and how early humans may have used resonance to shape experience. “It’s called archaeoacoustics and basically they went into ancient caves and saw how humans interacted with those caves and carved the caves and then they were using their voice to resonate frequencies and they were all playing at 110 hertz and basically what I was doing to the language part of the brain is they were feeling like they were having a transcendental experience or an experience with one with God and I think to have an interaction directly with nature you could push it further by like setting those types of things of like how you can actually carve those spaces and create different sensory experiences.”

yzyupdates

709,013 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Alex Krainer (Alex (Sasha) Krainer) lays out the highest-order Western geopolitical imperative: dominate the Eurasian landmass by subjugating China, Russia and Iran. Military defeat is not required. Political penetration, color revolutions, and assassinations are the preferred methods. The same system that imposed the Opium Wars and the Century of Humiliation on China is still operating today. “China is on the Eurasian continent, and so is Iran, and so is Russia. The United States and Great Britain have their highest-order geopolitical imperative: to dominate the Eurasian landmass. They need to subjugate not just Iran, but also China and Russia, and turn them into their own colonies. That is the plan. The Chinese are very much aware of that, and the Russians are aware of it, and the Iranians are aware of it. And they are also aware of what that means, because they have centuries’ worth of experience. When the British Empire first colonized China, they imposed two successive Opium Wars on them. At that time, China was not like some backwater. This was a 3,000-year-old civilization, and it was the world’s number one economic superpower. But it got absolutely crushed by the British. And then they imposed what the Chinese call a century of humiliation on them. And after two World Wars, China emerged as one of the world’s poorest countries. This was not because they sustained a military defeat. It’s not necessary for the United States to defeat China or Russia militarily. They specialize in penetrating political power. What they did in Ukraine in 2014 — they staged a coup. They overthrew Viktor Yanukovych, who was duly democratically elected. And they replaced him first with Arseniy Yatsenyuk, and then came Poroshenko. Now we have Zelensky. And then Ukraine became like an entity infected by a parasite, carrying water for the empire. Another alternative was Venezuela, where it was done even more elegantly. They basically just extracted Nicolás Maduro and somehow turned Delcy Rodríguez around. And now Venezuela is their vassal. If they were able to do that to Venezuela and to Ukraine and to Colombia and to many other countries, they could do the same to Russia. They don’t need to overthrow them militarily. Conceivably, they can stage some kind of a destabilization program; they can overthrow Vladimir Putin through some kind of a color revolution. The point is you take political control of the nation. You don’t have to defeat them militarily. And it’s preferable that you don’t defeat them militarily, because then you can use their military power against your next enemy. In the same way, after overthrowing Yanukovych, they started developing Ukraine as a proxy force against Russia. Well, if they overthrew Vladimir Putin and installed their own puppet there, they could use Russia in that same way against China. And that way they get their hegemony over the whole Eurasian landmass. And this is the great danger of this Western system. The Western empire will never stop trying to do this. If a color revolution fails, then they go with invasion. If the invasion fails, then they do what they did in Venezuela or assassinations like they did against Thomas Sankara, or like they tried many times against other leaders. This pathogen keeps attacking. It’s like a constant attack on the sovereignty and stability of every nation that they target, and they target any nation that refuses to be bludgeoned into submission. So this will continue. And I think that the conflict will continue until one side is completely defeated. Meanwhile, this danger is uniting the enemies together. Russia and China, who used to have major issues between themselves, have now become very tight allies, and they see this alliance as absolutely existential. Because if Russia falls, it might become an enemy to China. If Iran falls, it might become an enemy to Russia. And they will definitely try to raze the Belt and Road Initiative to the ground and force everybody back into the Western trade matrix and Western-imposed trade settlement currencies and reserve currencies. And then again you’ll be in a situation where you have maybe hundreds of billions of dollars in Western financial institutions, but you can’t use them unless you have approval and an agreement with the empire. So if you want to build diversified farming producing healthy foods, they’ll say, ‘No, but we’ll give you that money if you’re going to kill all the cows and build cricket farms.’ They want to shape the future of humanity, and they want to shape it in a way that’s utterly dystopian and ugly.” This is the pathogen that never stops attacking. Russia, China and Iran understand the danger. That is why their alliance is now existential.
6:45

Alex Krainer (Alex (Sasha) Krainer) lays out the highest-order Western geopolitical imperative: dominate the Eurasian landmass by subjugating China, Russia and Iran. Military defeat is not required. Political penetration, color revolutions, and assassinations are the preferred methods. The same system that imposed the Opium Wars and the Century of Humiliation on China is still operating today. “China is on the Eurasian continent, and so is Iran, and so is Russia. The United States and Great Britain have their highest-order geopolitical imperative: to dominate the Eurasian landmass. They need to subjugate not just Iran, but also China and Russia, and turn them into their own colonies. That is the plan. The Chinese are very much aware of that, and the Russians are aware of it, and the Iranians are aware of it. And they are also aware of what that means, because they have centuries’ worth of experience. When the British Empire first colonized China, they imposed two successive Opium Wars on them. At that time, China was not like some backwater. This was a 3,000-year-old civilization, and it was the world’s number one economic superpower. But it got absolutely crushed by the British. And then they imposed what the Chinese call a century of humiliation on them. And after two World Wars, China emerged as one of the world’s poorest countries. This was not because they sustained a military defeat. It’s not necessary for the United States to defeat China or Russia militarily. They specialize in penetrating political power. What they did in Ukraine in 2014 — they staged a coup. They overthrew Viktor Yanukovych, who was duly democratically elected. And they replaced him first with Arseniy Yatsenyuk, and then came Poroshenko. Now we have Zelensky. And then Ukraine became like an entity infected by a parasite, carrying water for the empire. Another alternative was Venezuela, where it was done even more elegantly. They basically just extracted Nicolás Maduro and somehow turned Delcy Rodríguez around. And now Venezuela is their vassal. If they were able to do that to Venezuela and to Ukraine and to Colombia and to many other countries, they could do the same to Russia. They don’t need to overthrow them militarily. Conceivably, they can stage some kind of a destabilization program; they can overthrow Vladimir Putin through some kind of a color revolution. The point is you take political control of the nation. You don’t have to defeat them militarily. And it’s preferable that you don’t defeat them militarily, because then you can use their military power against your next enemy. In the same way, after overthrowing Yanukovych, they started developing Ukraine as a proxy force against Russia. Well, if they overthrew Vladimir Putin and installed their own puppet there, they could use Russia in that same way against China. And that way they get their hegemony over the whole Eurasian landmass. And this is the great danger of this Western system. The Western empire will never stop trying to do this. If a color revolution fails, then they go with invasion. If the invasion fails, then they do what they did in Venezuela or assassinations like they did against Thomas Sankara, or like they tried many times against other leaders. This pathogen keeps attacking. It’s like a constant attack on the sovereignty and stability of every nation that they target, and they target any nation that refuses to be bludgeoned into submission. So this will continue. And I think that the conflict will continue until one side is completely defeated. Meanwhile, this danger is uniting the enemies together. Russia and China, who used to have major issues between themselves, have now become very tight allies, and they see this alliance as absolutely existential. Because if Russia falls, it might become an enemy to China. If Iran falls, it might become an enemy to Russia. And they will definitely try to raze the Belt and Road Initiative to the ground and force everybody back into the Western trade matrix and Western-imposed trade settlement currencies and reserve currencies. And then again you’ll be in a situation where you have maybe hundreds of billions of dollars in Western financial institutions, but you can’t use them unless you have approval and an agreement with the empire. So if you want to build diversified farming producing healthy foods, they’ll say, ‘No, but we’ll give you that money if you’re going to kill all the cows and build cricket farms.’ They want to shape the future of humanity, and they want to shape it in a way that’s utterly dystopian and ugly.” This is the pathogen that never stops attacking. Russia, China and Iran understand the danger. That is why their alliance is now existential.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

20,608 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

🇨🇳🇺🇸The former US Ambassador to China, Nicolas Burns, spoke honestly about China when he was out of the office: "We've underestimated Chinese power... I think the Chinese technology, military, and economics are stronger than we think they are." He articulated his points by comparing the high-speed rail infrastructure, the number of students in science and engineering, and the strategic plans of Chinese diplomacy and military... Infrastructure: The level of infrastructure in China that America lacks is a significant strength. Number of scientists: 34% of first-year university students in China study engineering or the STEM fields, while the number in America is 5.6%. And China has a larger population. CPC is strategic: China can make big bets over 10,20,30 years without the opposing strength. So, it's easy to understand why the US is now reacting so violently to China's rare earth controls. THEY HAVE LOST THE POSITION OF STRENGTH AND THE LEVERAGE TO COERCE CHINA. Just bluffing left.
2:35

🇨🇳🇺🇸The former US Ambassador to China, Nicolas Burns, spoke honestly about China when he was out of the office: "We've underestimated Chinese power... I think the Chinese technology, military, and economics are stronger than we think they are." He articulated his points by comparing the high-speed rail infrastructure, the number of students in science and engineering, and the strategic plans of Chinese diplomacy and military... Infrastructure: The level of infrastructure in China that America lacks is a significant strength. Number of scientists: 34% of first-year university students in China study engineering or the STEM fields, while the number in America is 5.6%. And China has a larger population. CPC is strategic: China can make big bets over 10,20,30 years without the opposing strength. So, it's easy to understand why the US is now reacting so violently to China's rare earth controls. THEY HAVE LOST THE POSITION OF STRENGTH AND THE LEVERAGE TO COERCE CHINA. Just bluffing left.

Li Zexin 李泽欣

373,826 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

.Google Cloud killed its own opening video 3 weeks before Google Cloud Next. In rehearsals, VP of Marketing Sarah Kennedy Ellis looked at the opener her team had built and called it. It was using AI, but not enough of it to actually showcase what the product could do. So they rebuilt it from scratch. In 3 weeks. Here's how it came together, straight from her SaaStr AI 2026 session: - It started on a napkin. A creative director sketched the concept by hand, then fed it into Nano Banana to generate the source images and inspiration. - The story was Google's own history. The 1998 origin garage. Dino. The original server rack that was actually built out of Legos. 138 Easter eggs packed into the video, prompted from Google's own lore. - Then they added motion with Veo and stitched it all together with a few custom agents built on the Gemini Enterprise platform. - The agents improvised. They prompted for balls representing customers, and the model added a burst of water that was nowhere in the brief. It injected its own creativity into a physical, on-stage moment. - The hardest part was the most physical: resolution. Max output was 4K. The screen at Next is the size of a 737. They had to upres from 4K to 12K using a custom Deep Mind model, the same one used for the Wizard of Oz production at the Sphere. Top Takeaways: 1️⃣ The old version of this project needed an agency, a much bigger budget, and a lot more than 3 weeks. That whole path collapsed into an internal team using their own tools. 2️⃣ And the same video was impossible a year earlier. They tried similar work the prior year and it was too early, mostly because of the upres wall. Twelve months later it shipped on the biggest screen they had.
1:32

.Google Cloud killed its own opening video 3 weeks before Google Cloud Next. In rehearsals, VP of Marketing Sarah Kennedy Ellis looked at the opener her team had built and called it. It was using AI, but not enough of it to actually showcase what the product could do. So they rebuilt it from scratch. In 3 weeks. Here's how it came together, straight from her SaaStr AI 2026 session: - It started on a napkin. A creative director sketched the concept by hand, then fed it into Nano Banana to generate the source images and inspiration. - The story was Google's own history. The 1998 origin garage. Dino. The original server rack that was actually built out of Legos. 138 Easter eggs packed into the video, prompted from Google's own lore. - Then they added motion with Veo and stitched it all together with a few custom agents built on the Gemini Enterprise platform. - The agents improvised. They prompted for balls representing customers, and the model added a burst of water that was nowhere in the brief. It injected its own creativity into a physical, on-stage moment. - The hardest part was the most physical: resolution. Max output was 4K. The screen at Next is the size of a 737. They had to upres from 4K to 12K using a custom Deep Mind model, the same one used for the Wizard of Oz production at the Sphere. Top Takeaways: 1️⃣ The old version of this project needed an agency, a much bigger budget, and a lot more than 3 weeks. That whole path collapsed into an internal team using their own tools. 2️⃣ And the same video was impossible a year earlier. They tried similar work the prior year and it was too early, mostly because of the upres wall. Twelve months later it shipped on the biggest screen they had.

Jason ✨👾SaaStr.Ai✨ Lemkin

18,937 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat