Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Scott Ritter explains how foreign intelligence agencies tried to trigger regime change in Iran by hijacking protests and using Starlink to coordinate covert cells. Iran tracked and shut down Starlink communications, rolled up the networks, and stopped the plan before airstrikes.

Partisan_12's profile picture

The Resonance

175,491 subscribers

43,451 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsEducationScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇮🇷🇺🇸🇮🇱⚡- Ex-CIA Analyst Says Foreign Intelligence Orchestrated Iran Protests, Not Organic Dissent The unrest in Iran wasn't organic, but a coordinated foreign operation. Former CIA officer Larry Johnson states the protests were driven by a joint CIA-Mossad effort aimed at destabilising Iran, including attempts to crash its currency. He reveals that Starlink terminals were pre-positioned and distributed through intelligence networks, alongside the funneling of money, weapons and ammunition to anti-government groups. According to Johnson, the operation only collapsed after Russian electronic warfare helped Iran disable Starlink, cutting off foreign coordination. The events expose an externally engineered destabilisation campaign, not a genuine popular uprising.
3:09

🇮🇷🇺🇸🇮🇱⚡- Ex-CIA Analyst Says Foreign Intelligence Orchestrated Iran Protests, Not Organic Dissent The unrest in Iran wasn't organic, but a coordinated foreign operation. Former CIA officer Larry Johnson states the protests were driven by a joint CIA-Mossad effort aimed at destabilising Iran, including attempts to crash its currency. He reveals that Starlink terminals were pre-positioned and distributed through intelligence networks, alongside the funneling of money, weapons and ammunition to anti-government groups. According to Johnson, the operation only collapsed after Russian electronic warfare helped Iran disable Starlink, cutting off foreign coordination. The events expose an externally engineered destabilisation campaign, not a genuine popular uprising.

MonitorX

106,239 views • 4 months ago

🇮🇷 Scott Ritter: Its CIA job to make Iran ‘conducive’ to regime change Donald Trump has made a decision to strike Iran “when the conditions can be met,” claims former US intelligence officer Scott Ritter.
1:33

🇮🇷 Scott Ritter: Its CIA job to make Iran ‘conducive’ to regime change Donald Trump has made a decision to strike Iran “when the conditions can be met,” claims former US intelligence officer Scott Ritter.

Sprinter Press

26,427 views • 3 months ago

“There will be a regime change in America before a regime change in Iran” -Scott Ritter
2:24

“There will be a regime change in America before a regime change in Iran” -Scott Ritter

Earth Hippy 🌎🕊️💚

240,692 views • 3 months ago

Trump stabbed Netanyahu in the back - Scott Ritter Somehow Trump missed the sweet spot to attack Iran. Now the entire Mossad network in Iran is gone. It took decades to build, and this is it. Russia helped Iran to identify the Starlink owners.
1:42

Trump stabbed Netanyahu in the back - Scott Ritter Somehow Trump missed the sweet spot to attack Iran. Now the entire Mossad network in Iran is gone. It took decades to build, and this is it. Russia helped Iran to identify the Starlink owners.

Alternative News

1,266,747 views • 4 months ago

Despite Iran's internet blackout, information about protests is flowing out of the country. Activists are using Elon Musk’s internet service Starlink to stay online as authorities try to shut it down. Al Jazeera's Hatem Salah explains how Starlink works and why it’s contentious.
2:28

Despite Iran's internet blackout, information about protests is flowing out of the country. Activists are using Elon Musk’s internet service Starlink to stay online as authorities try to shut it down. Al Jazeera's Hatem Salah explains how Starlink works and why it’s contentious.

Al Jazeera English

34,049 views • 4 months ago

It’s been over 24 hours now that the dictator of Iran has shut down internet connections for 90 million Iranians. Internet access is the lifeline of Iran uprising and by making Starlink services available for Iranian revolutionaries, Elon Musk has made a crucial and indispensable contribution to the fight for democracy in Iran. Thank you, Elon! Videos that people sent from Iran today using Starlink. ✌🏻 #Iran
4:57

It’s been over 24 hours now that the dictator of Iran has shut down internet connections for 90 million Iranians. Internet access is the lifeline of Iran uprising and by making Starlink services available for Iranian revolutionaries, Elon Musk has made a crucial and indispensable contribution to the fight for democracy in Iran. Thank you, Elon! Videos that people sent from Iran today using Starlink. ✌🏻 #Iran

Masih Alinejad 🏳️

97,532 views • 5 months ago

‼️🇺🇸🇮🇷How Iran Is Jamming Starlink During Nationwide Protests |Explained. On Jan 11, 2026 Iran has launched a sophisticated electronic warfare campaign to disrupt Starlink satellite internet during nationwide protests. This video explains how Starlink works, how Iran is jamming it, and why the disruption varies by location focusing on verified GPS/GNSS interference and TRONINO SIGNALS localized radio-frequency jamming used against low-Earth-orbit satellite links. We also break down the real LMING THE operational risks for users on the ground and why this marks a shift from internet censorship to battlefield-grade electronic warfare deployed domestically.
1:02

‼️🇺🇸🇮🇷How Iran Is Jamming Starlink During Nationwide Protests |Explained. On Jan 11, 2026 Iran has launched a sophisticated electronic warfare campaign to disrupt Starlink satellite internet during nationwide protests. This video explains how Starlink works, how Iran is jamming it, and why the disruption varies by location focusing on verified GPS/GNSS interference and TRONINO SIGNALS localized radio-frequency jamming used against low-Earth-orbit satellite links. We also break down the real LMING THE operational risks for users on the ground and why this marks a shift from internet censorship to battlefield-grade electronic warfare deployed domestically.

Defense Intelligence

113,733 views • 5 months ago

Dearborn Shiite scholar Usama Abdulghani: Protests in Iran are “Mossad riots”; these “dummies” were caught trying to use Starlink to contact their handlers in Tel Aviv and Langley, but Iran was able to shut it down.
1:41

Dearborn Shiite scholar Usama Abdulghani: Protests in Iran are “Mossad riots”; these “dummies” were caught trying to use Starlink to contact their handlers in Tel Aviv and Langley, but Iran was able to shut it down.

Open Source Intel

33,587 views • 4 months ago

Remember when Trump told the violent rioters in Iran to "KEEP PROTESTING - TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS!" It turns the State Dept. was smuggling 6,000 Starlink terminals into Iran to fuel the violence, according to a WSJ report. The plan was "regime change" and the US failed...
1:54

Remember when Trump told the violent rioters in Iran to "KEEP PROTESTING - TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS!" It turns the State Dept. was smuggling 6,000 Starlink terminals into Iran to fuel the violence, according to a WSJ report. The plan was "regime change" and the US failed...

Rachel Blevins

34,935 views • 4 months ago

🇮🇱🇮🇷 RITTER: ISRAEL'S STRIKES SIGNAL “REGIME CHANGE” OBJECTIVE FOR IRAN Scott Ritter: "This is a decisive measure taken by Israel. Israel is all in on whatever objective it is they’re trying to achieve. I believe this is a regime change activity… an existential struggle between Israel and Iran. Either Iran is defeated and the regime is overthrown, or Israel is compelled to back away."
2:10

🇮🇱🇮🇷 RITTER: ISRAEL'S STRIKES SIGNAL “REGIME CHANGE” OBJECTIVE FOR IRAN Scott Ritter: "This is a decisive measure taken by Israel. Israel is all in on whatever objective it is they’re trying to achieve. I believe this is a regime change activity… an existential struggle between Israel and Iran. Either Iran is defeated and the regime is overthrown, or Israel is compelled to back away."

Mario Nawfal

441,852 views • 1 year ago

THIS ISN’T GETTING NEARLY ENOUGH ATTENTION U.S. intelligence intercepted an encrypted transmission believed to be from Iran, possibly an operational trigger for sleeper cells. The signal was broadcast across multiple countries and appears designed for covert operatives with the encryption key, allowing instructions to be sent without using normal internet or phone networks. 🚨 Government alert: Iran may be activating sleeper cells With Trump and Hegseth running the show, we are screwed.
2:10

THIS ISN’T GETTING NEARLY ENOUGH ATTENTION U.S. intelligence intercepted an encrypted transmission believed to be from Iran, possibly an operational trigger for sleeper cells. The signal was broadcast across multiple countries and appears designed for covert operatives with the encryption key, allowing instructions to be sent without using normal internet or phone networks. 🚨 Government alert: Iran may be activating sleeper cells With Trump and Hegseth running the show, we are screwed.

Christopher Webb

12,774 views • 3 months ago

Trump and Elon plan to use Starlink to help restore communications to those affected by Hurricane Helene! Meanwhile, the Biden regime are unresponsive and uninterested. Unelected billionaires are doing more for The People than the federal government.
0:37

Trump and Elon plan to use Starlink to help restore communications to those affected by Hurricane Helene! Meanwhile, the Biden regime are unresponsive and uninterested. Unelected billionaires are doing more for The People than the federal government.

Clandestine

170,061 views • 1 year ago

IRAN WAR BOMBSHELL: It Has Now Been Confirmed That The Office Of National Intelligence And The Pentagon Warned President Trump One Week Before the Iran War Began That In Most Scenarios, The United States Would Fail Massively With Regime Change In Iran And Potentially Trigger A Global Catastrophe
6:13

IRAN WAR BOMBSHELL: It Has Now Been Confirmed That The Office Of National Intelligence And The Pentagon Warned President Trump One Week Before the Iran War Began That In Most Scenarios, The United States Would Fail Massively With Regime Change In Iran And Potentially Trigger A Global Catastrophe

Alex Jones

2,035,884 views • 3 months ago

🔥 Scott Ritter makes a claim that, if true, reframes everything… According to Ritter, Trump’s last-minute decision not to trigger an attack on Iran was not hesitation, but a deliberate move to dismantle a long-prepared regime-change operation involving Mossad, the CIA, and the usual neocon war hawks. The way Ritter describes it, Trump allowed these actors to believe he was fully aligned with their objective. At Mar-a-Lago he came to an agreement with Netanyahu. He let them plan, activate networks and position assets. In other words, he let the operation reach the point of maximum exposure, and then, at the very last moment, he didn’t pull the trigger. Iran, allegedly alerted by Russia (with Trump’s knowledge? 🤔) moved in time to dismantle the entire covert network. Assets were rolled up, communications were compromised, the entire infrastructure was destroyed. Finito. Bear in mind, these kinds of intelligence networks take years, sometimes decades, to build, so once exposed, they don’t simply get rebuilt, the capability itself disappears. So if this account holds, Trump didn’t just stop a regime-change operation in that moment. He removed the ability to carry one out in the foreseeable future, (at least under Israel’s terms). But the genius of it doesn’t stop there… By allowing the situation to escalate right up to the edge, Trump also forced Iran into believing an attack was imminent. And when a regime truly believes the moment has arrived, it reveals itself; emergency protocols get activated, military movements occur, communication pathways change and leadership protection mechanisms are triggered. In other words, Iran showed its hand. That response; how they move, what they protect, what they prioritise, what they trigger, is priceless intelligence, which you only get it when the other side believes it’s real. Israel and the intelligence hawks were allowed to overextend and expose their covert machinery. Iran was pressured into revealing its defensive response. No war was launched, no missiles fired, but the strategic balance changed completely. If this was a carefully premeditated plan by Trump, as Ritter suggests, then it was nothing short of genius; warmongers were neutralised, the adversary was exposed, war was avoided and Trump walks away with all the leverage. That’s strategic mastery, and it’s exactly why Trump continues to confound both his enemies and his supposed allies. Alex (Sasha) Krainer EKO MrTruthBomb ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸 jamiemcintyre
1:42

🔥 Scott Ritter makes a claim that, if true, reframes everything… According to Ritter, Trump’s last-minute decision not to trigger an attack on Iran was not hesitation, but a deliberate move to dismantle a long-prepared regime-change operation involving Mossad, the CIA, and the usual neocon war hawks. The way Ritter describes it, Trump allowed these actors to believe he was fully aligned with their objective. At Mar-a-Lago he came to an agreement with Netanyahu. He let them plan, activate networks and position assets. In other words, he let the operation reach the point of maximum exposure, and then, at the very last moment, he didn’t pull the trigger. Iran, allegedly alerted by Russia (with Trump’s knowledge? 🤔) moved in time to dismantle the entire covert network. Assets were rolled up, communications were compromised, the entire infrastructure was destroyed. Finito. Bear in mind, these kinds of intelligence networks take years, sometimes decades, to build, so once exposed, they don’t simply get rebuilt, the capability itself disappears. So if this account holds, Trump didn’t just stop a regime-change operation in that moment. He removed the ability to carry one out in the foreseeable future, (at least under Israel’s terms). But the genius of it doesn’t stop there… By allowing the situation to escalate right up to the edge, Trump also forced Iran into believing an attack was imminent. And when a regime truly believes the moment has arrived, it reveals itself; emergency protocols get activated, military movements occur, communication pathways change and leadership protection mechanisms are triggered. In other words, Iran showed its hand. That response; how they move, what they protect, what they prioritise, what they trigger, is priceless intelligence, which you only get it when the other side believes it’s real. Israel and the intelligence hawks were allowed to overextend and expose their covert machinery. Iran was pressured into revealing its defensive response. No war was launched, no missiles fired, but the strategic balance changed completely. If this was a carefully premeditated plan by Trump, as Ritter suggests, then it was nothing short of genius; warmongers were neutralised, the adversary was exposed, war was avoided and Trump walks away with all the leverage. That’s strategic mastery, and it’s exactly why Trump continues to confound both his enemies and his supposed allies. Alex (Sasha) Krainer EKO MrTruthBomb ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸 jamiemcintyre

Laura Aboli Official

1,200,498 views • 4 months ago

🤥👹 Scott Ritter: Trump set Netanyahu up — and burned the Mossad network in Iran 👉 The Iran strike plan was cooked up at Mar-a-Lago by Iseraeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, US President Donald Trump and Sebator Lindsey Graham, former US Marine Corps intelligence officer Scott Ritter said. He said coordination ran deep between Mossad, CIA, British and Dutch intelligence. 💬 “It seems to me that Trump set up, Lindsey Graham set up, Netanyahu set them all up because they shot their bolt,” Ritter said. “The Mossad network that was used is gone, finished.” 🗣 He says the twist is that Trump "set them all up" by holding off until it was too late. 🇮🇷🇷🇺 Iran, with alleged Russian help, broke spy codes, waited for replacement Starlink kits to arrive and captured them—wiping out a decades-old Mossad network in one go.
1:42

🤥👹 Scott Ritter: Trump set Netanyahu up — and burned the Mossad network in Iran 👉 The Iran strike plan was cooked up at Mar-a-Lago by Iseraeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, US President Donald Trump and Sebator Lindsey Graham, former US Marine Corps intelligence officer Scott Ritter said. He said coordination ran deep between Mossad, CIA, British and Dutch intelligence. 💬 “It seems to me that Trump set up, Lindsey Graham set up, Netanyahu set them all up because they shot their bolt,” Ritter said. “The Mossad network that was used is gone, finished.” 🗣 He says the twist is that Trump "set them all up" by holding off until it was too late. 🇮🇷🇷🇺 Iran, with alleged Russian help, broke spy codes, waited for replacement Starlink kits to arrive and captured them—wiping out a decades-old Mossad network in one go.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

85,779 views • 4 months ago

Elon Musk has confirmed that Starlink is offering free access in Iran following discussions with U.S. defense officials. The regime is responding by raiding homes, confiscating Starlink devices, and arresting those found with them, while also attempting to disrupt signals. The battle is now being fought not only on the streets, but in the information and communications space as well.
0:58

Elon Musk has confirmed that Starlink is offering free access in Iran following discussions with U.S. defense officials. The regime is responding by raiding homes, confiscating Starlink devices, and arresting those found with them, while also attempting to disrupt signals. The battle is now being fought not only on the streets, but in the information and communications space as well.

Tousi TV

28,743 views • 5 months ago

WATCH: How protests in Iran were hijacked by Mossad agents to incite regime change Follow
3:13

WATCH: How protests in Iran were hijacked by Mossad agents to incite regime change Follow

Palestine Declassified

13,087 views • 4 months ago

Coming up on The World 🌍 How is Starlink being used to defy the internet blackout? And can China and India really influence Tehran's leaders? Watch the latest on the protests in Iran 🔽 📱 📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602, Freeview 233 and YouTube
1:08

Coming up on The World 🌍 How is Starlink being used to defy the internet blackout? And can China and India really influence Tehran's leaders? Watch the latest on the protests in Iran 🔽 📱 📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602, Freeview 233 and YouTube

Yalda Hakim

14,258 views • 5 months ago

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 FORMER CIA OFFICER: U.S. WILL STRIKE IRAN BY END OF MARCH Larry Johnson says the attack is coming by end of March, maybe sooner. He claims the December currency crash wasn't random. CIA, Mossad, and MI6 deliberately tanked Iran's economy after smuggling in Starlink terminals months earlier. The next day Netanyahu met Trump at Mar-a-Lago to coordinate the military plan. When Iran shut down the internet, protests dried up overnight and millions came out backing Khamenei instead. Trump postponed after getting briefed the strike wouldn't topple the government. But military equipment keeps flowing to the region, and Iran now has full backing from Russia and China. Full interview with Larry Johnson below
6:07

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 FORMER CIA OFFICER: U.S. WILL STRIKE IRAN BY END OF MARCH Larry Johnson says the attack is coming by end of March, maybe sooner. He claims the December currency crash wasn't random. CIA, Mossad, and MI6 deliberately tanked Iran's economy after smuggling in Starlink terminals months earlier. The next day Netanyahu met Trump at Mar-a-Lago to coordinate the military plan. When Iran shut down the internet, protests dried up overnight and millions came out backing Khamenei instead. Trump postponed after getting briefed the strike wouldn't topple the government. But military equipment keeps flowing to the region, and Iran now has full backing from Russia and China. Full interview with Larry Johnson below

Mario Nawfal

35,999 views • 4 months ago

Iran is tracking down Starlink users, seizing terminals, and trying to disrupt the service with signal jamming, according to WSJ
0:24

Iran is tracking down Starlink users, seizing terminals, and trying to disrupt the service with signal jamming, according to WSJ

Current Report

62,637 views • 5 months ago