正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Seattle didn’t just elect a mayor — it elected the next blueprint for democratic socialism, giving Katie Wilson 61% of the vote in a city already collapsing under its own policies. She’s Mamdani 2.0, West Coast edition. 👉Her husband doesn’t work, her parents pay $2200 a month for her...

84,567 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Let's hear what others are saying about Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson's terrible, horrible, no good, very bad week; Seattle Councilwoman Juarez: "I see a complete lack of leadership and for us, a 'No Confidence' in this administration...I'll say it again on the record; I don't think that this mayor has made the transition from activist, to campaign, to Mayor Wilson." Seattle Council President Hollingsworth: "I believe this decision to ask a police chief to resign, or to let him go, is irresponsible and a tad bit reckless, and put's us in a very difficult position as a city." Seattle Councilwoman Rivera: "It is unacceptable for this amount of time to occur without confirmation from her office, as to whether or not we are indeed going to have Chief Barnes as police chief, or what the plan is if he is not going to be." Seattle Councilman Saka: "I am personally disappointed and deeply concerned with the Mayor's decision to remove a police chief in this time." Seattle Councilman Kettle: "The people of Seattle deserve better, and they deserve reliable leadership, especially as we close out a busy summer of public events." Governor Ferguson: 'It wasn't me that delayed the public for 5 hours. No comment on the Mayor and the Chief, but I personally have a good relationship with my head of Washington State Patrol.' Seattle Police Officer's Guild: "Seattle deserves a mayor focused on preventing the next tragedy - not managing the next political crisis. Unfortunately, Mayor Katie has made it clear that public safety is not her administration's priority." Former State Representative Dawn mason: "How is she going to hire a new police chief under these circumstances. Who would want to work for the city?" By far, the biggest criticism of Mayor Wilson came from longtime Councilwoman Debora Juarez, which is why we have attached her interview with KOMO's Chris Daniels. We'd also like to recognize that Daniels is responsible for interviewing all of the people quoted above (except SPOG), in separate interviews which you can find at Chris Daniels | KOMO News 'Councilmember Juarez reacts to Mayor Katie Wilson asking Seattle Police Chief Shon Barnes to resign'

Future 42

24,180 次观看 • 1 个月前

Our campaign is proud to be endorsed by Chris Hedges! Chris Hedges is a Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist, author, and host of the online broadcast The Chris Hedges Report. In his endorsement, Hedges says: "I’ve admired and supported the revolutionary socialist Kshama Sawant since she was first elected in 2013 to the Seattle City Council. Her fierce commitment to the working class, her steadfast defiance of the billionaires who destroyed our democracy, and her anti-imperialist and anti-colonialist credentials have long made her a special target. "The billionaire class has pumped millions of dollars into campaigns to defeat her and orchestrated a recall vote in 2021, which she fought and won. "Her current campaign for Congress is part of our grassroots struggle to wrest power from the hands of the global ruling class. It is a campaign for free healthcare for all funded by taxing the rich. It is a campaign to raise the minimum wage to at least $25 an hour. It is a campaign to block landlords from extorting massive rents and evicting families. It is a campaign to drive politicians like Adam Smith, a tool of big business who is funded by and subservient to the Israel lobby, from Congress. "In an age when we stand on the cusp of fascism, we cannot rely on the Democratic Party, whose betrayal of the working class and subservience to the rich gave us Trump. "We need a political earthquake. We need a revolution. But it won’t happen until we stand with revolutionaries like Kshama."

Kshama Sawant

13,525 次观看 • 2 个月前

This comes from her recent chat with David Axelrod at the University of Chicago. She was asked about possibly running for president in 2028, and she basically said her goals are way bigger than any title like president or senator. Her exact words were something like, “They assume that my ambition is positional… a title or seat, and my ambition is way bigger than that. My ambition is to change this country.” She pointed out that presidents and members of Congress come and go, but things like single-payer healthcare, a living wage, and workers’ rights are “forever.” She’s been open about being a democratic socialist for years and wanting systemic change in that direction. This just frames it as her real focus, not chasing higher office. AOC backed Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist mayor, from the start and spoke at his inauguration, calling it a “new era” for the city where they chose “prosperity for the many over spoils for the few.” She frames the challenges as inherited problems, not results of socialist policies. NYC does face real issues right now: ongoing population decline across income levels, businesses and high earners leaving, and questions about whether Mamdani’s new budget truly fixed the big deficit or just kicked it down the road with state aid and taxes on the wealthy. The bigger point about socialism clashing with a constitutional republic, that’s a fundamental tension. The U.S. system is built on limited government, individual rights, and private property. Heavy redistribution and central planning strain that framework. AOC sees “democratic socialism” as just expanding the welfare state and regulating markets within democracy, not replacing the Constitution. Critics argue that’s a distinction that tends to blur over time when the incentives shift toward more control. History has plenty of Countries to learn from where it’s been proven Socialism and Communism do not work.

Patricia 🇺🇸

43,102 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨HOLY SH*T! If Democrats lose CNN, then you know we’re in trouble. CNN’s Fareed Zakaria TORCHES NYC and other Democrat-led cities over failed policies and astronomical spending, promising everything while wasting billions of taxpayers’ dollars and dodging accountability. “Zohran Mamdani ran on a promise to make New York affordable — a mandate for a city we can afford. Last week, he unveiled a budget that is, in a word, UNAFFORDABLE. NYC’s budget has ballooned in recent years. Michael Bloomberg’s last budget, adopted for fiscal year 2014, totaled about $70 billion. With population decline, New York’s general spending in 2023 was more than 30% higher per capita than Los Angeles and more than double Houston’s. NYC’s largest school district in the country — the city’s education budget — has climbed while enrollment has shrunk. The DOE budget has risen from roughly $34 billion in 2019 to over $40 billion, while the DOE says per-student spending is projected to reach nearly $35,000 in fiscal year 2026, among the highest in the nation. The outputs — graduation numbers, test scores, and reading levels — are, at best, middling, often comparable to places that spend a fraction of what New York does. New York already sits at the extreme end of the American tax spectrum. For high earners, the combined state-plus-city income tax reaches 14.76%, and the combined marginal rate can reach roughly 55% on certain investment income. New Yorkers pay tax rates comparable to European countries that, in return, provide universal healthcare, free college education, and outstanding infrastructure. New Yorkers get some 300 miles of sidewalk sheds. On business taxation, the city is also off the charts: the Citizens Budget Commission reports that New York City business activity faces the country’s highest combined corporate tax rate, 70.44%. Mamdani wants to hike income and corporate rates even further — or else, he says, he will raise property taxes by almost 10%. Property taxes already made up more than 27% of the cost of homeownership in the city as of 2022, above the national average. New York is really a prime example of a problem Democrats seem unwilling to confront: blue cities are out of control — promising more, spending more, delivering less, and pushing off fiscal problems to some future day. Los Angeles is another one-party metropolis wrestling with affordability and disorder. The city’s homelessness budget for fiscal year 2025–2026 totals about $950 million. The LA Homeless Services Authority reported that in 2023 homelessness was up 9% countywide and 10% in the city, and a 2024 AP account noted that homelessness has surged 70% countywide since 2015 and 8% in the city — all this amid public frustration despite billions spent. An audit reviewed $2.4 billion in city homelessness funding and found that officials could not reliably track where it went, what it achieved, or take Chicago, with a mayor whose approval rating is deep underwater, where the pension promises are so large that they will surely bankrupt the city at some point. What is the theory of good government here? If the answer is “keep adding programs,” the city will keep producing unaffordability — because unaffordability is what happens when government becomes a machine that grows faster than the society it governs. NYC’s rental assistance spending rose from $263 million in fiscal year 2020 to $1.3 billion in the most recently reported fiscal year — a fivefold increase in a handful of years — and housing costs only got worse. For Democrats in city halls, there is a choice: stop governing as if the goal is to announce new entitlements, and instead make government work — safer streets, functioning schools, predictable sanitation, and, above all, enough housing that the middle class can find places to live. New York City does not need more soaring rhetoric; it needs more homes.”

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

137,863 次观看 • 7 个月前