Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The Barry Young interview should be compulsory viewing for everyone—but particularly for police officers, lawyers, prosecutors, and members of the judiciary. Whatever your views on COVID-19 vaccines, the issues and questions it raises about transparency, accountability, and the handling of public health data deserve careful consideration. Credit to FreeNZ...

11,013 views • 29 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨NEW ZEALAND IN FULL BLOWN PANIC MODE! Health Care Worker/Data Administrator, Barry young, BLEW THE LID on How Many People Truly Died from Pfizer Vaccine Batches! He Was Then Raided and Now Faces 7 Years in Prison WHAT HAPPENED? Barry Young worked on a project at “Te Whatu Ora” as a data administrator to implement a vaccine payment system to providers. Te Whatu Ora is a Public Health Agency established by the New Zealand Government. Because Barry helped build this system, he had access to vaccine-related data and he was shocked to learn that a lot of people were dying a week after being vaccinated. Shocked at his discovery, he downloaded and shared that data with the world. THREE VIDEO BREAKDOWN: VIDEO #1 Barry Young breaks down how he came about this data and the Pfizer Vaccine batch data, showing a death rate ranging between 5-25%. VIDEO #2 Liz Gunn sounds the alarm that Barry Young, as well as someone who corroborated his findings, was RAIDED! She calls for a global effort to make this story known. VIDEO #3 The significance of this data being released. More context. WHERE THINGS ARE NOW: Te Whatu Ora has been granted an injunction that "prevents any publication of the data" by the Employment Relations Authority. Te Whatu Ora has alleged Young downloaded the data, and has since removed all his access to their systems. Barry Young, was charged with accessing a computer system for “dishonest purposes”, which carries a maximum penalty of seven years' prison. The police said they would be opposing his release on bail, because of the risk he could continue to spread “misinformation.” UNBELIEVABLE! I hope the people of New Zealand stand with this man. #nzdataleak

jamiemcintyre

432,482 views • 2 years ago

If Barry Young Isn’t a Whistleblower, No One in New Zealand Ever Will Be In this critical clip, the discussion centres on the single most important question in Barry Young’s Barry Young case: is he a whistleblower under New Zealand’s Protected Disclosures Act? If the court says yes, the case ends, he is protected, and the people’s own data can finally be examined by independent epidemiologists around the world. If the court says no, the Act itself is effectively gutted - reduced to another hollowed-out piece of legislation, just as the Bill of Rights was overridden by vaccine mandates, financial coercion and the constant use of “emergency” powers. Barry is the archetype whistleblower. The outcome will either empower future truth-tellers or send a chilling message that no one who challenges the government will ever be protected. A clear warning about the erosion of civil liberties and why this ruling matters far beyond one man’s court case. Clip Transcript: [Liz Gunn] "If you don't qualify as a whistleblower Barry Young, no one in New Zealand will ever qualify as a whistleblower. [Barry Young] It'll be a game changer. [Liz] You are the archetype whistleblower. [Barry] It will be a game changer because this has never been tried before under this new Act. It's a unique case. It's a very nuanced case, but essentially it just boils down to: Am I a Whistleblower or not? It's a very simple question. [Liz] If you are a whistleblower, the case is over. You're no longer in court. You are protected. So from that point you can then put out to the People the People's own data. And it can go around the world for epidemiologists of integrity to examine that data and say, hey, what's going on in New Zealand, shows also what's happening in the UK or Canada or Australia. Same thing. So it's crucial that you are designated a whistleblower. What happens if the court says, no, we're going to go with the corruption. We're going to go with the government's instructions. We're not going to designate Barry Young a whistleblower. What happens then? [Barry] Well, if they say no, they essentially hollow out the purpose of the Act. They basically just destroy it. And it becomes another legacy Act that they've just gutted. Along with the Bill of Rights, who I think is that is just, yeah, it's just paper. It's not worth anything now, what they've done to that. Because we had all these these Rights about vaccinations and stuff like that. We were allowed to decide whether or not to put a substance in our body. We've got that freedom. It went to Nuremberg as well - right! That was the whole purpose of the Nuremberg trials. You should not put an unknown substance into your body. You've got that fundamental right as a human being to say NO, however, with... the Bill of Rights didn't apply. Oh, now you've got to have the vaccine or you don't work. We will cut you off from your finances. You will not be allowed to feed your children if you don't have this vaccine. Now, hang on. What happened to the Bill of Rights there? And so if they do that with this, it'll just [be] another erosion of our civil liberties and our rights. [Liz] And the way Ardern got around the Bill of Rights was saying this is emergency. This is an emergency. And they keep on bringing emergency. They're trying to ramp up the bird flu scam here. Under emergency, we will do it. We must never let the government do anything to us under emergency. The government is not our friend. It's not trustworthy."

Liz Gunn

15,900 views • 1 month ago

Steve Kirsch Steve Kirsch on Barry Young’s Barry Young Whistleblower Hearing: NZ Data Cover-Up Exposed - In Court on Dec 11 - Steve Kirsch joins to discuss Barry Young’s crucial Voir Dire hearing which is taking place this Thursday 11 Dec 2025 in the Wellington District Court. - Crown drops 19-page “expert” evidence amendment just 3 days before trial (image-only PDF, non-searchable) - Retired Prof Robert Scragg admits he never analysed the full 2.2 million-row dataset – he stopped at 1 million rows - Scragg claims “MedSafe stopped monitoring the jab outcomes and that that is “proof of safety” - Kirsch: Czech, NZ, Japan, Israel & US data all show the same mortality spikes, post-vaccination - If judge rules that only people with PhD’s or other equivalent level of academic training, qualify as ‘whistleblowers’, then NZ whistleblower protection will be dead - Crown has already signalled they will apply for an ‘instant appeal. if they lose this Voir Dire hearing on December 11. Barry faces jail for releasing FULLY anonymised, pay-per-dose, data showing serious harm signals. The Ministry of Health in New Zealand still refuses to release its OWN analysis after 735 days since Barry brought his sincere concerns to their attention. Please come to Wellington if you can, to support Barry: Thursday 11 December, 9 am, Wellington District Court. Share widely – worldwide ‘eyes on this case’ matter enormously, in order for Barry Young to have any chance of getting any kind of fairness in this Voir Dire, and for him to be officially designated as the brave Whistleblower that he is.

Liz Gunn

15,825 views • 8 months ago