Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

SECURE DATA WIPING In October 2025, I expanded my forensic analysis to a second-hand mobile phone acquired from Accra Circle. During the examination, I recovered extensive WhatsApp artifacts dating as far back as 2016 and 2017. These included voice notes, images, videos, call logs, and full file system data....

RedHatPentester's profile picture

Nana Sei Anyemedu

36,051 subscribers

14,270 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Why did Ian Whiffin agree to give expert testimony on Jen McCabe’s cellphone extraction, when the state refused to let him look at or even give him the full, original extraction OR its verification hash? A thread🧵 Full cellphone extractions, sometimes called forensic images, generate what’s called a “hash value”, which serves as a unique digital fingerprint necessary for ensuring the integrity of data. Any discrepancy between the hash values indicates tampering with or corruption of evidence, alerting forensic examiners to potential issues with the evidence. Hash verification is a fundamental principle and a rather ubiquitous practice in the world of digital forensics, where data validation and verification are key. It is the gold standard across the industry, and has also become so in the courtroom, whereby admissibility of digital evidence is determined by its relevance, authenticity and reliability. In court, the hash value can be used to demonstrate that the evidence has not been altered since its collection, and is a universal way for experts to authenticate and validate the reliability of data for the trial Court. But, an extraction that’s missing a hash value altogether is a huge red flag. 🚩 Who removed the hash value? And why? It’s necessary to the chain of custody, and as Gaurino and Tully would be well aware, it’s also an element of the data that an expert would require in order to verify and validate it. There’s no “good” reason for why someone would remove a hash value, and the extraction can’t be characterized as a forensic image as its origin is unknown. This was a deliberate step taken to hide something, which one could argue shows consciousness of guilt. If the data are true and accurate, why would you bring their integrity into question by removing the hash? However, if the data were altered or tampered with, and let’s say, hypothetically speaking, you wanted a digital forensic expert to provide testimony supportive of your “Google search” theory. . . In that hypothetical, you’d have to remove the hash value. Otherwise, the expert would immediately detect that the data were altered, as they would not be able to verify the hash against the original. #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption #KarenRead #Cellebrite #DFIR
0:23

Why did Ian Whiffin agree to give expert testimony on Jen McCabe’s cellphone extraction, when the state refused to let him look at or even give him the full, original extraction OR its verification hash? A thread🧵 Full cellphone extractions, sometimes called forensic images, generate what’s called a “hash value”, which serves as a unique digital fingerprint necessary for ensuring the integrity of data. Any discrepancy between the hash values indicates tampering with or corruption of evidence, alerting forensic examiners to potential issues with the evidence. Hash verification is a fundamental principle and a rather ubiquitous practice in the world of digital forensics, where data validation and verification are key. It is the gold standard across the industry, and has also become so in the courtroom, whereby admissibility of digital evidence is determined by its relevance, authenticity and reliability. In court, the hash value can be used to demonstrate that the evidence has not been altered since its collection, and is a universal way for experts to authenticate and validate the reliability of data for the trial Court. But, an extraction that’s missing a hash value altogether is a huge red flag. 🚩 Who removed the hash value? And why? It’s necessary to the chain of custody, and as Gaurino and Tully would be well aware, it’s also an element of the data that an expert would require in order to verify and validate it. There’s no “good” reason for why someone would remove a hash value, and the extraction can’t be characterized as a forensic image as its origin is unknown. This was a deliberate step taken to hide something, which one could argue shows consciousness of guilt. If the data are true and accurate, why would you bring their integrity into question by removing the hash? However, if the data were altered or tampered with, and let’s say, hypothetically speaking, you wanted a digital forensic expert to provide testimony supportive of your “Google search” theory. . . In that hypothetical, you’d have to remove the hash value. Otherwise, the expert would immediately detect that the data were altered, as they would not be able to verify the hash against the original. #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption #KarenRead #Cellebrite #DFIR

Olivia

270,376 просмотров • 1 год назад

It’s hard to believe that 3 years ago, none of this was possible. Now, it’s pretty much going to change everything. Last month, Fish Audio reached out to me to try their voice AI software. They just launched their new S1 model today, and I was curious about the state of AI and voice (and everything else), so I gave it a spin. I liked it enough that when I was asked about a partnership, I said yes. I’m free to talk about what I like and don’t like about the software, and I’m going to share with you a few voices I cloned as well as some of the workflow. It was much easier than I thought. To give you an example, here is a private (research only) voice I cloned as a test. I grabbed a clip of Rutger Hauer’s famous speech from Blade Runner and uploaded it to the voice cloner on the Fish Audio Website as a private voice (no one else can use it, as it is for research only). I didn’t think it would work. The audio sample is very short. But Fish Audio was able to clone the voice extremely well and very fast. I didn’t have to upload any more than that to produce these results. I used Grok to write the new dialog, and I added the rain and background effects and the result is pretty impressive. It only took just a few minutes once I had the audio uploaded for everything from cloning to generating multiple takes. I’ll give some tips and pointers on how to get the best results at the conclusion of this thread and show you some surprising things it can do. (con’t) #Promotion
0:37

It’s hard to believe that 3 years ago, none of this was possible. Now, it’s pretty much going to change everything. Last month, Fish Audio reached out to me to try their voice AI software. They just launched their new S1 model today, and I was curious about the state of AI and voice (and everything else), so I gave it a spin. I liked it enough that when I was asked about a partnership, I said yes. I’m free to talk about what I like and don’t like about the software, and I’m going to share with you a few voices I cloned as well as some of the workflow. It was much easier than I thought. To give you an example, here is a private (research only) voice I cloned as a test. I grabbed a clip of Rutger Hauer’s famous speech from Blade Runner and uploaded it to the voice cloner on the Fish Audio Website as a private voice (no one else can use it, as it is for research only). I didn’t think it would work. The audio sample is very short. But Fish Audio was able to clone the voice extremely well and very fast. I didn’t have to upload any more than that to produce these results. I used Grok to write the new dialog, and I added the rain and background effects and the result is pretty impressive. It only took just a few minutes once I had the audio uploaded for everything from cloning to generating multiple takes. I’ll give some tips and pointers on how to get the best results at the conclusion of this thread and show you some surprising things it can do. (con’t) #Promotion

Grummz

69,859 просмотров • 1 год назад

This is a shocking reminder of why you can never let your guard down, even when dealing with retail employees at a major service provider. ​In a disturbing breach of trust, a Metro by T-Mobile store associate took advantage of a customer who was simply trying to upgrade a phone. While pretending to assist with the device and transfer data, the worker took the customer’s unlocked phone and secretly opened their Cash App. ​The employee successfully transferred $400 directly to her own account. Greedy for more, she immediately tried to drain another $500. Fortunately, the bank flagged the second back-to-back transaction as highly suspicious and denied the transfer, stopping the theft from escalating. Police were called to the scene, and bodycam footage captured the investigation that ultimately exposed the employee’s pattern of predatory behavior. ​This incident serves as a massive wake-up call for everyone. Your phone is your digital wallet, and handing it over to anyone—even a retail worker in uniform—comes with severe risks. ​To protect your money and your identity, always follow these critical security steps: ​1. Enable a security lock (Face ID, fingerprint, or a strict PIN) explicitly for all financial apps like Cash App, Venmo, and mobile banking. Even if your phone is unlocked, the apps themselves should require a separate login. 2. Never give your phone’s master passcode to a retail employee. They do not need it to activate a device. 3. Log out of your financial and password-manager apps before handing your phone over for tech support. 4. Watch the employee like a hawk. If they need to take your phone to a back room, tell them you prefer the work be done right in front of you. ​Don't let a routine errand turn into a financial nightmare. Stay vigilant and lock your data.
7:52

This is a shocking reminder of why you can never let your guard down, even when dealing with retail employees at a major service provider. ​In a disturbing breach of trust, a Metro by T-Mobile store associate took advantage of a customer who was simply trying to upgrade a phone. While pretending to assist with the device and transfer data, the worker took the customer’s unlocked phone and secretly opened their Cash App. ​The employee successfully transferred $400 directly to her own account. Greedy for more, she immediately tried to drain another $500. Fortunately, the bank flagged the second back-to-back transaction as highly suspicious and denied the transfer, stopping the theft from escalating. Police were called to the scene, and bodycam footage captured the investigation that ultimately exposed the employee’s pattern of predatory behavior. ​This incident serves as a massive wake-up call for everyone. Your phone is your digital wallet, and handing it over to anyone—even a retail worker in uniform—comes with severe risks. ​To protect your money and your identity, always follow these critical security steps: ​1. Enable a security lock (Face ID, fingerprint, or a strict PIN) explicitly for all financial apps like Cash App, Venmo, and mobile banking. Even if your phone is unlocked, the apps themselves should require a separate login. 2. Never give your phone’s master passcode to a retail employee. They do not need it to activate a device. 3. Log out of your financial and password-manager apps before handing your phone over for tech support. 4. Watch the employee like a hawk. If they need to take your phone to a back room, tell them you prefer the work be done right in front of you. ​Don't let a routine errand turn into a financial nightmare. Stay vigilant and lock your data.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

447,454 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

[Video] 20251217 | YouTube Lawyer’s Analysis Video - Translation “Kim Sae-ron Recording Deemed ‘Inconclusive’ by the National Forensic Service — Does It Have Legal Evidentiary Value?” Hello, this is Attorney Jo Gi-hyun, representative of Daehan Jungang. Regarding the audio recording released by Kim Se-ui of Garosero, which has been presented as evidence to support the claim that Kim Soo-hyun engaged in inappropriate relations with Kim Sae-ron, the National Forensic Service (NFS) has concluded that it is “impossible to determine” whether the recording was manipulated. If this recording is classified as “inconclusive,” how should the legal disputes surrounding Kim Soo-hyun be addressed, and how are they likely to be handled? This recording attempts to prove that there was an inappropriate relationship between Kim Soo-hyun and the late Kim Sae-ron. However, if it is not even possible to determine whether the recording is authentic or fabricated, then the recording itself inherently suffers from a failure to function properly as evidence. From a legal structural standpoint, this means that it is not Kim Soo-hyun who must prove his innocence, but rather the party attacking him must prove the existence of immoral conduct. Under these circumstances, the National Forensic Service’s conclusion of “inconclusive” actually places Kim Soo-hyun in a more favorable legal position. Let us examine this more specifically. Kim Soo-hyun has filed a criminal complaint against Kim Se-ui on the grounds of defamation through the dissemination of false information. In response, Kim Se-ui’s side asserts that Kim Soo-hyun and Kim Sae-ron had an inappropriate relationship and has submitted this audio recording as evidence. In other words, Kim Se-ui’s position is as follows: Even if the formal elements of defamation are satisfied, the content he disclosed is not false, and its disclosure was necessary in the public interest because it reflects the truth. From Kim Soo-hyun’s perspective, since the National Forensic Service did not definitively conclude that the recording was manipulated, there may, on a formal level, remain some degree of uncertainty as to whether Kim Se-ui was spreading false information or stating the truth. However, the fundamental issue is this: The party who initiated the attack is Kim Se-ui, and the core of his allegation is that Kim Soo-hyun engaged in immoral and improper conduct. The central piece of evidence supporting this allegation is precisely this audio recording. Yet now, even the authenticity of this crucial evidence cannot be determined. This means that the content asserted by Kim Se-ui carries a high likelihood of being interpreted as false information. From a civil law perspective, this issue becomes even more critical. Currently, multiple companies and advertisers have filed large-scale damage claims against Kim Soo-hyun, citing the alleged inappropriate relationship between Kim Soo-hyun and Kim Sae-ron as the basis for their lawsuits. But the problem is this: The core evidence used to determine whether such an inappropriate relationship existed—the audio recording—cannot be authenticated even by the National Forensic Service. Under these circumstances, how much probative value can this recording truly have in civil litigation? Especially in today’s reality, where AI-based synthesis and manipulation technologies are rapidly advancing, it is absolutely unacceptable in legal disputes to criminalize, demonize, and effectively put someone on trial based solely on materials that are known to carry the possibility of fabrication or manipulation. #WeStandWithKimSooHyun #김수현 #KimSooHyun #金秀賢 #キムスヒョン #คิมซูฮยอน
3:25

[Video] 20251217 | YouTube Lawyer’s Analysis Video - Translation “Kim Sae-ron Recording Deemed ‘Inconclusive’ by the National Forensic Service — Does It Have Legal Evidentiary Value?” Hello, this is Attorney Jo Gi-hyun, representative of Daehan Jungang. Regarding the audio recording released by Kim Se-ui of Garosero, which has been presented as evidence to support the claim that Kim Soo-hyun engaged in inappropriate relations with Kim Sae-ron, the National Forensic Service (NFS) has concluded that it is “impossible to determine” whether the recording was manipulated. If this recording is classified as “inconclusive,” how should the legal disputes surrounding Kim Soo-hyun be addressed, and how are they likely to be handled? This recording attempts to prove that there was an inappropriate relationship between Kim Soo-hyun and the late Kim Sae-ron. However, if it is not even possible to determine whether the recording is authentic or fabricated, then the recording itself inherently suffers from a failure to function properly as evidence. From a legal structural standpoint, this means that it is not Kim Soo-hyun who must prove his innocence, but rather the party attacking him must prove the existence of immoral conduct. Under these circumstances, the National Forensic Service’s conclusion of “inconclusive” actually places Kim Soo-hyun in a more favorable legal position. Let us examine this more specifically. Kim Soo-hyun has filed a criminal complaint against Kim Se-ui on the grounds of defamation through the dissemination of false information. In response, Kim Se-ui’s side asserts that Kim Soo-hyun and Kim Sae-ron had an inappropriate relationship and has submitted this audio recording as evidence. In other words, Kim Se-ui’s position is as follows: Even if the formal elements of defamation are satisfied, the content he disclosed is not false, and its disclosure was necessary in the public interest because it reflects the truth. From Kim Soo-hyun’s perspective, since the National Forensic Service did not definitively conclude that the recording was manipulated, there may, on a formal level, remain some degree of uncertainty as to whether Kim Se-ui was spreading false information or stating the truth. However, the fundamental issue is this: The party who initiated the attack is Kim Se-ui, and the core of his allegation is that Kim Soo-hyun engaged in immoral and improper conduct. The central piece of evidence supporting this allegation is precisely this audio recording. Yet now, even the authenticity of this crucial evidence cannot be determined. This means that the content asserted by Kim Se-ui carries a high likelihood of being interpreted as false information. From a civil law perspective, this issue becomes even more critical. Currently, multiple companies and advertisers have filed large-scale damage claims against Kim Soo-hyun, citing the alleged inappropriate relationship between Kim Soo-hyun and Kim Sae-ron as the basis for their lawsuits. But the problem is this: The core evidence used to determine whether such an inappropriate relationship existed—the audio recording—cannot be authenticated even by the National Forensic Service. Under these circumstances, how much probative value can this recording truly have in civil litigation? Especially in today’s reality, where AI-based synthesis and manipulation technologies are rapidly advancing, it is absolutely unacceptable in legal disputes to criminalize, demonize, and effectively put someone on trial based solely on materials that are known to carry the possibility of fabrication or manipulation. #WeStandWithKimSooHyun #김수현 #KimSooHyun #金秀賢 #キムスヒョン #คิมซูฮยอน

Echoes of Kim Soo Hyun_CN

18,933 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Jen McCabe and the 2.27 am Google search. The signed hash documentation from Jen McCabe’s phone extraction was not provided to either Greene or Whiffin, which has been described as unprecedented. Why? What are they hiding? Calling it “debunked” when both experts agree they cannot rule out manipulation is difficult to justify. “However, as Mr. Whiffin acknowledges in his report, the Cellebrite program cannot validate the data because the value is unsigned. In other words, the GreyKey Image of Jennifer McCabe's cell phone could have been manipulated, then re-hashed after the manipulation, and still show the same resulting hash value included in the PDF file.” “In all of my years working as a forensic examiner, this is the first, time I have ever received a forensic image of a phone without the corresponding hash value.” “In addition to law enforcement's failure to provide the hash documentation associated with the raw image of Jennifer McCabe's cell phone, there were additional: anomalies within the processed data that are suggestive of manipulation as reported by tools such as Cellebrite and Axiom.”
0:31

Jen McCabe and the 2.27 am Google search. The signed hash documentation from Jen McCabe’s phone extraction was not provided to either Greene or Whiffin, which has been described as unprecedented. Why? What are they hiding? Calling it “debunked” when both experts agree they cannot rule out manipulation is difficult to justify. “However, as Mr. Whiffin acknowledges in his report, the Cellebrite program cannot validate the data because the value is unsigned. In other words, the GreyKey Image of Jennifer McCabe's cell phone could have been manipulated, then re-hashed after the manipulation, and still show the same resulting hash value included in the PDF file.” “In all of my years working as a forensic examiner, this is the first, time I have ever received a forensic image of a phone without the corresponding hash value.” “In addition to law enforcement's failure to provide the hash documentation associated with the raw image of Jennifer McCabe's cell phone, there were additional: anomalies within the processed data that are suggestive of manipulation as reported by tools such as Cellebrite and Axiom.”

Lara

21,412 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Elon Musk: “I am not working on a phone. I can tell you where I think things will go, which is that we’re not going to have a phone in the traditional sense. What we’ll call a phone will really be an edge node for AI inference with some radios to connect. Essentially, you’ll have AI on the server side communicating with AI on your device—formerly known as a phone—and generating real-time video of anything you could possibly want. There won’t be operating systems or apps in the future; it’ll just be a device that’s there for the screen and audio, and to put as much AI on the device as possible.” (via Joe Rogan Experience Podcast)
2:10

Elon Musk: “I am not working on a phone. I can tell you where I think things will go, which is that we’re not going to have a phone in the traditional sense. What we’ll call a phone will really be an edge node for AI inference with some radios to connect. Essentially, you’ll have AI on the server side communicating with AI on your device—formerly known as a phone—and generating real-time video of anything you could possibly want. There won’t be operating systems or apps in the future; it’ll just be a device that’s there for the screen and audio, and to put as much AI on the device as possible.” (via Joe Rogan Experience Podcast)

Sawyer Merritt

4,406,279 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The footage shown is regarding a historical event known as the Brookside Marketplace tragedy. It remains one of the most prominent cold cases in the region of Tinley Park, Illinois. ​The event took place during a typical morning at a retail clothing location. An unidentified male entered the establishment under the guise of a delivery person or surveyor. Once inside, he moved the individuals present—five customers and the store manager—into a rear storage area. ​During the encounter, a total of six women were harmed. Five of the individuals did not survive the event, while one woman survived the injuries she sustained. The survivor later became a key witness for the ensuing investigation, providing vital details regarding the assailant's appearance and the nature of the encounter. ​The Investigation and Search for the Assailant ​Law enforcement agencies launched an extensive investigation, collecting DNA evidence and ballistic data from the scene. Despite these efforts, the case faced significant hurdles: ​Suspect Description: The survivor helped create a composite sketch of a man with a distinct hairstyle featuring braided rows and a single green bead. ​The 911 Audio: A brief emergency call was placed during the event, which captured the assailant’s voice. Forensic experts have analyzed this audio for years to identify speech patterns or background noise. ​The Documentary Influence: The footage you viewed is linked to a documentary titled 15, produced by filmmaker Charlie Minn. The project was designed to re-examine the evidence and encourage anyone with suppressed information to come forward, utilizing modern digital reach to find leads that were unavailable during the initial inquiry. ​Current Status ​The case is categorized as an active, ongoing investigation. Although a significant financial reward has been maintained for information leading to an arrest, the identity of the person responsible remains unknown. Local authorities continue to review the file periodically as forensic technology advances, specifically in the areas of genetic genealogy and audio enhancement.
3:05

The footage shown is regarding a historical event known as the Brookside Marketplace tragedy. It remains one of the most prominent cold cases in the region of Tinley Park, Illinois. ​The event took place during a typical morning at a retail clothing location. An unidentified male entered the establishment under the guise of a delivery person or surveyor. Once inside, he moved the individuals present—five customers and the store manager—into a rear storage area. ​During the encounter, a total of six women were harmed. Five of the individuals did not survive the event, while one woman survived the injuries she sustained. The survivor later became a key witness for the ensuing investigation, providing vital details regarding the assailant's appearance and the nature of the encounter. ​The Investigation and Search for the Assailant ​Law enforcement agencies launched an extensive investigation, collecting DNA evidence and ballistic data from the scene. Despite these efforts, the case faced significant hurdles: ​Suspect Description: The survivor helped create a composite sketch of a man with a distinct hairstyle featuring braided rows and a single green bead. ​The 911 Audio: A brief emergency call was placed during the event, which captured the assailant’s voice. Forensic experts have analyzed this audio for years to identify speech patterns or background noise. ​The Documentary Influence: The footage you viewed is linked to a documentary titled 15, produced by filmmaker Charlie Minn. The project was designed to re-examine the evidence and encourage anyone with suppressed information to come forward, utilizing modern digital reach to find leads that were unavailable during the initial inquiry. ​Current Status ​The case is categorized as an active, ongoing investigation. Although a significant financial reward has been maintained for information leading to an arrest, the identity of the person responsible remains unknown. Local authorities continue to review the file periodically as forensic technology advances, specifically in the areas of genetic genealogy and audio enhancement.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

15,512 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

In Arizona, Maricopa County 2020 election officials WIPED the entire EMS database & all election records right before the audit and it was CAUGHT on video. The deletion was a deliberate cover-up to destroy and eliminate any and ALL evidence of audit trails, logs, vote manipulation, ballot adjudication irregularities, and fraud in the 2020 election. Brian Ramirez, who was the Database Admin, and Kristi Passarelli were caught on video using fake badges and violating policy, while committing illegal acts and election fraud. The entire "Database" directory was deleted from the D drive of the EMS Primary machine. The main "Results Tally and Reporting" database, core of the Dominion EMS, was missing or not found in its expected location. Logs showed someone accessed the system and executed a purge of all records for the 2020 general election. Critical election data, results, ballot images, reporting files, appeared to have been wiped. The deletion was done illegally to prevent forensic examination of the 2020 results, making independent verification or forensic analysis impossible. The logs were eventually recovered, but the most important part of this entire story is, "WHY did they have to delete these election logs and records in the first place?" To cover up that the 2020 election was STOLEN.
2:50

In Arizona, Maricopa County 2020 election officials WIPED the entire EMS database & all election records right before the audit and it was CAUGHT on video. The deletion was a deliberate cover-up to destroy and eliminate any and ALL evidence of audit trails, logs, vote manipulation, ballot adjudication irregularities, and fraud in the 2020 election. Brian Ramirez, who was the Database Admin, and Kristi Passarelli were caught on video using fake badges and violating policy, while committing illegal acts and election fraud. The entire "Database" directory was deleted from the D drive of the EMS Primary machine. The main "Results Tally and Reporting" database, core of the Dominion EMS, was missing or not found in its expected location. Logs showed someone accessed the system and executed a purge of all records for the 2020 general election. Critical election data, results, ballot images, reporting files, appeared to have been wiped. The deletion was done illegally to prevent forensic examination of the 2020 results, making independent verification or forensic analysis impossible. The logs were eventually recovered, but the most important part of this entire story is, "WHY did they have to delete these election logs and records in the first place?" To cover up that the 2020 election was STOLEN.

The SCIF

56,195 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

FACT CHECK: Here at the first trial, the Commonwealth’s own expert witness, Ian Whiffin, confirms the necessity & importance of hash values for the sake of “hash verification”, a necessary step in authenticating the data & being able to verify that it hasn’t been altered or manipulated. In fact, Whiffin actually gives this testimony in response to a question about when the data have been altered or tampered with, if there’s a way for the forensic examiner (him) to detect it, and/or verify its authenticity and integrity. Remarkably, despite the DFIR industry standard methodology of hash verifying a digital forensic extraction, like that of Jen McCabe’s iPhone, prior to conducting any analysis on it with any forensic tools, Ian Whiffin testified that notably, for his work on this case, not only did he abandon this standard methodology, but he also admitted that the forensic extraction of Jen McCabe’s iPhone, which he received from the Commonwealth, was stripped of its hash value. Perhaps more remarkably, this stunning fact apparently didn’t raise any red flags for Ian Whiffin when conducting his analysis in this case, where he’s providing testimony in a murder trial. One must ask themselves why that is? However, defense expert Richard Green, in his affidavit, states that: “Typically, forensic examiners are provided with the raw image file and the associated: hash value documentation together. After validating the hash value, I would then accept that the data has not been manipulated. Here, however, the hash documentation was not provided with the raw image of the cell phone. Instead, it was withheld from the defense. As a forensic examiner having received hundreds of imaged phones over the course of my decades-long career, this was unprecedented.” Contrary to Mr. Whiffin’s approach, upon initially receiving a purported extraction of Jen McCabe’s iPhone without a hash value to authenticate and verify the integrity of the data, Mr. Green promptly requested the hash value and corresponding GrayKey supplemental files from the Commonwealth in order to conduct his analysis. After making this demand, and when the Commonwealth had to produce the hash verification data for Jen McCabe’s iPhone, remarkably, the Commonwealth also produced—for the first time, and over a year later on February 8, 2023—the Full File System Extraction of Jen McCabe’s iPhone (see “Notice of Discovery VIII,” attached). Unlike the initial purported “extraction” produced by Trooper Nicholas Guarino, this one contained Jen McCabe’s incriminating 2:27am Google search and all of the manual deletions of her communications, among other incriminating evidence, surrounding the murder of Officer John O’Keefe (see defense’s Rule 17 motion from April 12, 2023, attached). So, this begs the question: If Ian Whiffin knows the importance of hash verification in validating the authenticity of the data he’s working with in the first place, then why didn’t he take the same actions as defense expert Richard Green did to responsibly and reliably provide analysis in this case? If Whiffin ought to be deemed an expert, qualified to provide analysis and testimony at trial, then why did he abandon his industry’s standard methodology of hash verification in this case? Even Cellebrite knows this is a no-no! What say you? #KarenReadTrial #Cellebrite #DFIR
0:06

FACT CHECK: Here at the first trial, the Commonwealth’s own expert witness, Ian Whiffin, confirms the necessity & importance of hash values for the sake of “hash verification”, a necessary step in authenticating the data & being able to verify that it hasn’t been altered or manipulated. In fact, Whiffin actually gives this testimony in response to a question about when the data have been altered or tampered with, if there’s a way for the forensic examiner (him) to detect it, and/or verify its authenticity and integrity. Remarkably, despite the DFIR industry standard methodology of hash verifying a digital forensic extraction, like that of Jen McCabe’s iPhone, prior to conducting any analysis on it with any forensic tools, Ian Whiffin testified that notably, for his work on this case, not only did he abandon this standard methodology, but he also admitted that the forensic extraction of Jen McCabe’s iPhone, which he received from the Commonwealth, was stripped of its hash value. Perhaps more remarkably, this stunning fact apparently didn’t raise any red flags for Ian Whiffin when conducting his analysis in this case, where he’s providing testimony in a murder trial. One must ask themselves why that is? However, defense expert Richard Green, in his affidavit, states that: “Typically, forensic examiners are provided with the raw image file and the associated: hash value documentation together. After validating the hash value, I would then accept that the data has not been manipulated. Here, however, the hash documentation was not provided with the raw image of the cell phone. Instead, it was withheld from the defense. As a forensic examiner having received hundreds of imaged phones over the course of my decades-long career, this was unprecedented.” Contrary to Mr. Whiffin’s approach, upon initially receiving a purported extraction of Jen McCabe’s iPhone without a hash value to authenticate and verify the integrity of the data, Mr. Green promptly requested the hash value and corresponding GrayKey supplemental files from the Commonwealth in order to conduct his analysis. After making this demand, and when the Commonwealth had to produce the hash verification data for Jen McCabe’s iPhone, remarkably, the Commonwealth also produced—for the first time, and over a year later on February 8, 2023—the Full File System Extraction of Jen McCabe’s iPhone (see “Notice of Discovery VIII,” attached). Unlike the initial purported “extraction” produced by Trooper Nicholas Guarino, this one contained Jen McCabe’s incriminating 2:27am Google search and all of the manual deletions of her communications, among other incriminating evidence, surrounding the murder of Officer John O’Keefe (see defense’s Rule 17 motion from April 12, 2023, attached). So, this begs the question: If Ian Whiffin knows the importance of hash verification in validating the authenticity of the data he’s working with in the first place, then why didn’t he take the same actions as defense expert Richard Green did to responsibly and reliably provide analysis in this case? If Whiffin ought to be deemed an expert, qualified to provide analysis and testimony at trial, then why did he abandon his industry’s standard methodology of hash verification in this case? Even Cellebrite knows this is a no-no! What say you? #KarenReadTrial #Cellebrite #DFIR

Olivia

20,211 просмотров • 1 год назад

The hunger strike was not just a protest, but an attempt to draw attention to the injustice of the trial: Ruben Vardanyan suspended his hunger strike During a phone call relayed through his family, Ruben Vardanyan sent two audio messages from a Baku prison: he requested that one be published today and the other on Sunday. He also stated that his next statement will only be made at the final court session — and only if representatives of the international community are present. In the audio message released today, Vardanyan emphasizes that his hunger strike was not merely a protest but an effort to draw attention to the injustice of the trial and the broader situation faced by Armenians: “I had several goals when I did this, when I declared my hunger strike: to show that there is no trial, but a farce; to show that it is not me who is being judged, but all Armenians and the state itself; and to show the price that had to be paid by all those who, in their hearts, would have been happy to stay and live here (in Artsakh), and not leave”. The full text version of the message is available here:
6:58

The hunger strike was not just a protest, but an attempt to draw attention to the injustice of the trial: Ruben Vardanyan suspended his hunger strike During a phone call relayed through his family, Ruben Vardanyan sent two audio messages from a Baku prison: he requested that one be published today and the other on Sunday. He also stated that his next statement will only be made at the final court session — and only if representatives of the international community are present. In the audio message released today, Vardanyan emphasizes that his hunger strike was not merely a protest but an effort to draw attention to the injustice of the trial and the broader situation faced by Armenians: “I had several goals when I did this, when I declared my hunger strike: to show that there is no trial, but a farce; to show that it is not me who is being judged, but all Armenians and the state itself; and to show the price that had to be paid by all those who, in their hearts, would have been happy to stay and live here (in Artsakh), and not leave”. The full text version of the message is available here:

Ruben Vardanyan

34,372 просмотров • 1 год назад

Video showcasing the new updated intervention screen. Again I love the idea, but I really do not think this is the way to capture data from people. It’s just too intrusive and will throw people off. Some ideas: - It needs to be a smaller window that you can press to expand (and see the intervention reasons) - It should go away on its own after x seconds - something related to destination parking would be a good option? - voice note should just be one of the options in the list rather than an entire separate pop up - the mockup that ΛI DRIVR showed would be the absolute best way to handle this. You can observe all of your disengagements at the end of your drive and then you can go through and take the time to tag it all properly. As it is now I would guess 75% of people are just going to hit an option at random to dismiss the popup. Tesla AI Ashok Elluswamy
0:42

Video showcasing the new updated intervention screen. Again I love the idea, but I really do not think this is the way to capture data from people. It’s just too intrusive and will throw people off. Some ideas: - It needs to be a smaller window that you can press to expand (and see the intervention reasons) - It should go away on its own after x seconds - something related to destination parking would be a good option? - voice note should just be one of the options in the list rather than an entire separate pop up - the mockup that ΛI DRIVR showed would be the absolute best way to handle this. You can observe all of your disengagements at the end of your drive and then you can go through and take the time to tag it all properly. As it is now I would guess 75% of people are just going to hit an option at random to dismiss the popup. Tesla AI Ashok Elluswamy

Devin Olsen

11,310 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

There's a very small YouTube channel that uses stock footage and narration, where the voice seems to be AI trained on my voice. I was told about it from one of my viewers that said when he started watching this channel he realized it was my voice, but with AI. It for sure doesn't sound perfect, and it still has that "AI" sound to it, but this stuff is going to get a lot more convincing really soon. There's not really any tools to deal with this currently, as there's no reporting system, and it's not an exact copy because the narration is different. But I feel like this may become a much bigger problem for YouTube in the future. They are going to have to adapt their copyright system to include AI voice and video copies of people under impersonation.
0:37

There's a very small YouTube channel that uses stock footage and narration, where the voice seems to be AI trained on my voice. I was told about it from one of my viewers that said when he started watching this channel he realized it was my voice, but with AI. It for sure doesn't sound perfect, and it still has that "AI" sound to it, but this stuff is going to get a lot more convincing really soon. There's not really any tools to deal with this currently, as there's no reporting system, and it's not an exact copy because the narration is different. But I feel like this may become a much bigger problem for YouTube in the future. They are going to have to adapt their copyright system to include AI voice and video copies of people under impersonation.

Joseph Carlson

46,024 просмотров • 1 год назад

💬: What raises suspicion of surveillance is this: in Dani’s case, it was said that her side had already received a formal legal notice two weeks earlier. The notice basically stated that if certain matters were not explained, the contract would be terminated. What’s most shocking is that, according to reports, one of the main issues raised was why a parent had replaced a phone after losing it. The implication seemed to be that the parent changed the phone in order to destroy evidence that might have been on it. You can sit there and spin your own baseless theories like that if you want, but if the phone hadn’t been replaced, were you planning to demand it and run forensic analysis on it? Even if you asked for the phone, just like President Lee Jae-myung has said before, you are not an investigative authority or a law enforcement agency. You have no right to demand a phone, especially a parent’s phone. When I heard this from a tip-off, I honestly found it terrifying.
0:26

💬: What raises suspicion of surveillance is this: in Dani’s case, it was said that her side had already received a formal legal notice two weeks earlier. The notice basically stated that if certain matters were not explained, the contract would be terminated. What’s most shocking is that, according to reports, one of the main issues raised was why a parent had replaced a phone after losing it. The implication seemed to be that the parent changed the phone in order to destroy evidence that might have been on it. You can sit there and spin your own baseless theories like that if you want, but if the phone hadn’t been replaced, were you planning to demand it and run forensic analysis on it? Even if you asked for the phone, just like President Lee Jae-myung has said before, you are not an investigative authority or a law enforcement agency. You have no right to demand a phone, especially a parent’s phone. When I heard this from a tip-off, I honestly found it terrifying.

1tokki

293,847 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Pakistani counterintelligence operation succeeds in capturing RAW-asset masquerading as JAAC activist, conversation with Indian Colonel seized and captured as well. AJK Police in a joint operation with member agencies of the Pakistan Intelligence Community have arrested one asset of a foreign hostile intelligence agency, R&AW, namely BILAL, who was currently working as a political activist for JAAC. The suspect was arrested in Rawalkot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, and has been remanded to local police. Forensic examination of his mobile phone revealed links with Indian intelligence agencies. Analysis of his WhatsApp communications indicates that he was receiving direct instructions from an active Indian military officer identified as Colonel Kumar regarding active and ongoing efforts to create unrest in Azad Jammu & Kashmir (AJK) under the guise of JAAC. Communications further suggest coordination of activities aimed at destabilizing law and order situation in the region. The suspect Bilal was offered PKR 500,000 for each police official targeted and killed. Personal Note: Ngl I always knew these JAAC mofos had traitors amongst them working for India.
0:41

Pakistani counterintelligence operation succeeds in capturing RAW-asset masquerading as JAAC activist, conversation with Indian Colonel seized and captured as well. AJK Police in a joint operation with member agencies of the Pakistan Intelligence Community have arrested one asset of a foreign hostile intelligence agency, R&AW, namely BILAL, who was currently working as a political activist for JAAC. The suspect was arrested in Rawalkot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, and has been remanded to local police. Forensic examination of his mobile phone revealed links with Indian intelligence agencies. Analysis of his WhatsApp communications indicates that he was receiving direct instructions from an active Indian military officer identified as Colonel Kumar regarding active and ongoing efforts to create unrest in Azad Jammu & Kashmir (AJK) under the guise of JAAC. Communications further suggest coordination of activities aimed at destabilizing law and order situation in the region. The suspect Bilal was offered PKR 500,000 for each police official targeted and killed. Personal Note: Ngl I always knew these JAAC mofos had traitors amongst them working for India.

The STRATCOM Bureau

36,745 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A whistleblower who works as a counterterrorism analyst for the U.S. Army, that the DEA, DOJ, Homeland Security, and the FBI allegedly confirmed, named Scott Bennett, claimed on record that BIDEN visited SERBIA in May of 2009 to personally recruit computer hackers to control Dominion election equipment in U.S. elections. Tabulators and other election equipment from ES&S, DOMINION, and SMARTMATIC were examined and found to have internet access devices in order to be controlled from anywhere in the world. The also found a serial port in the back of the machines in which a device can be inserted in seconds to give root access with NO PASSWORD to the entire machine which would allow them to rewrite the code in the machine to have it do whatever it would be programmed to do. There are a massive amount of variables that can be changed to manipulate the outcome of an election, how the tabulators read ballots, flips votes, or cause hundreds of thousands, even millions of votes to enter adjudication, which was a main method of voter fraud. This is a massive security flaw that was well known which can be accessed in under a min to completely take over elections. The truth is that these really aren't security flaws. These are techniques and methods incorporated into the hardware and software which enable multiple methods and techniques to manipulate the outcome to your choice and to what you can get away with. These machine were designed to literally steal elections.
6:53

A whistleblower who works as a counterterrorism analyst for the U.S. Army, that the DEA, DOJ, Homeland Security, and the FBI allegedly confirmed, named Scott Bennett, claimed on record that BIDEN visited SERBIA in May of 2009 to personally recruit computer hackers to control Dominion election equipment in U.S. elections. Tabulators and other election equipment from ES&S, DOMINION, and SMARTMATIC were examined and found to have internet access devices in order to be controlled from anywhere in the world. The also found a serial port in the back of the machines in which a device can be inserted in seconds to give root access with NO PASSWORD to the entire machine which would allow them to rewrite the code in the machine to have it do whatever it would be programmed to do. There are a massive amount of variables that can be changed to manipulate the outcome of an election, how the tabulators read ballots, flips votes, or cause hundreds of thousands, even millions of votes to enter adjudication, which was a main method of voter fraud. This is a massive security flaw that was well known which can be accessed in under a min to completely take over elections. The truth is that these really aren't security flaws. These are techniques and methods incorporated into the hardware and software which enable multiple methods and techniques to manipulate the outcome to your choice and to what you can get away with. These machine were designed to literally steal elections.

The SCIF

43,792 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад