Seedance 2.5 vs MiniMax H3 Max Same prompt. Both models at max specs. Seedance 2.5 1080p · 15s generated in 4m 56s MiniMax H3 Max 768p · 15s generated in 18s

Start creating with all frontier video models in Venice Studio.

Yeah, Seedance won that one.

I use Minimax myself. But I must admit that Seedance 2.5 image quality is much better. Although the generation, of course, takes longer.

The video model era of quality vs quantity has begun

Seednace looks sooo much better, I don't mind it being a lot slower.

The speed difference here is genuinely impressive

This type of comparison is really useful, especially for video where it can be costly to test the different models!

Speed wins with H3 Max quality wins with Seedance 2.5

The main issue is the price

you cant compare prompt to prompt. H3 can do great quality. clearly this was a shitty prompt for H3 and a good prompt for SD.

Seedance look like stone age here..😂😂

we look at generation speed as a cost-of-capital problem. 18s vs 5m is the difference between renting compute for a job and buying a server you don't need next week

@xAIworlds

So minimax h3 with more powerful machine can do streaming already and some US company taking credit for that. Lmao

只要用过就知道这个时间不准确🥸

Hey Sir

MiniMax H3 is better on @AskVenice than open router . takes ~ $0.20–0.35 / 10s clip on average and fast enough.

The comparison is resolution plus latency, not quality. 1080p in five minutes versus 768p in 18 seconds is a different job: final delivery versus iterating the shot until it works.

8$ VS 4$

That latency gap is enormous, although 1080p versus 768p makes the economics even more interesting. Did both runs use comparable GPU classes? We’re testing how heterogeneous hardware affects inference routing on Kerrigan V2. 👀

the generation time gap here is the real headline. 18s vs nearly 5 minutes changes whether you iterate on a prompt or fire it once and move on