Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ SELECTIVE BILLIONAIRE OUTRAGE Kamala: "There is an unelected billionaire who should not and will not have a greater voice than the working people of Wisconsin." Interesting how Kamala is suddenly concerned about "unelected billionaire" influence in Wisconsin, while remaining conspicuously silent about George Soros pumping millions into the...

184,197 views โ€ข 1 year ago โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

This wallet receives $279,000 from Elon Musk. Elon does not even know about it. Musk is the most unpredictable person on the internet. At 2 AM he posts memes about Mars. At lunch he throws a tantrum. Then goes silent for two days. He has no schedule. No rhythm. No logic. At least that is what I thought. Until I stumbled upon a trader with the nickname Annica. What this account does is statistically impossible. 8 bets in a row on the number of Musk tweets per week. And all 8 times hit exactly right. And here is the part that made me uneasy. On Polymarket these are not over/under bets. You have to choose a narrow range. For example 500-519 tweets. Or 520-539 tweets. A window of just 20 tweets. While Musk writes hundreds of them. Guess once? Lucky. Guess twice? Coincidence. Hit this tiny range eight times in a row? This is not luck. This is information. I checked the transaction history: - December: Range 500-519. Entry $21K โ†’ Exit $127K. - January: Range 560-579. Entry $21K โ†’ Exit $118K. $282,000 in pure profit from someone knowing the habits of a billionaire better than he knows himself. I spent three days racking my brain over who this is. Theory 1: An insider. An assistant who sees the drafts. Or someone who manages his calendar. Theory 2: An AI algorithm that analyzed Musk sleep cycles and his reactions to news over 10 years. Honestly? I do not care. I realized one thing: I will never crack this code myself. I do not have access to Elon phone. And I do not have 5 months to build a neural network. But I do not need that. Annica takes the risk. Annica does the calculations. Annica knows the secret. All I need is to know when Annica places a bet. Instead of guessing what will pop into the head of the richest person on Earth, I just set up a notification on this wallet. One signal. One copy. One exit: Right now Elon is probably typing another tweet. Annica already knows how many there will be this week. Do you?

Blaze

21,436 views โ€ข 6 months ago

๐Ÿšจ CNBC's negative bias on silver I watched CNBC yesterday, and maybe 20 different people talking about silver: โžก๏ธ not a word about Chinaโ€™s industrial needs, and how they need to refill SGE/SFE. โžก๏ธ not a word about the ETFs in India requiring a lot of silver โžก๏ธ not a word about China implementing export restrictions 1st of January โžก๏ธ not a word about the once-in-a-lifetime shift for green energy โžก๏ธ not a word about the Samsung 1 kilo silver battery โžก๏ธ not a word about BRICS and how they are moving away from the dollar โžก๏ธ not a word about how silver paper price is set โžก๏ธ not a word about the banks losing control of the price mechanism โžก๏ธ not a word about the shift in short positions โžก๏ธ not a word about the huge inflow to silver ETFs โžก๏ธ not a word about the physical tightness in London โžก๏ธ suggesting shorting silver and go long gold ๐ŸšจThere was not one single guy from the mining industry or long-term investors, like Eric Sprott, Rick Rule , GoldSilver , David Morgan , Peter Schiff , Andy Schectman , James Henry Anderson , Josh Philip Phair , EB Tucker or Keith Neumeyer. With the price gains in 2025 certainly all of these people should be on the screen, and there are a lot of other candiates as well. In stead CNBC just interview paper traders who either call it a trade or who are negative, while CNBC staff lauging, shaking their heads saying silver is overpriced. On CBNC, what other commodity or company would have nobody representing the long-term investor side? The way silver is mocked in the western world makes me certain China will win the silver-war.

Solve Nettug

12,677 views โ€ข 7 months ago

People have spent months complaining about Keir Starmer. They've complained about immigration. They've complained about the economy. They've complained about taxes. They've complained about the direction this country is heading. And now we're being told who the next Prime Minister is going to be. Not asked. Told. Am I the only one who thinks that's insane? Millions of people are struggling. Millions of people are unhappy with the state of the country. Yet when it comes to deciding who leads it next, they don't get a say. Instead, politicians make the decision behind closed doors and the public is expected to just accept it. If people are unhappy enough to force one Prime Minister out, surely they should have a say in who replaces him. Otherwise, what's the point? We keep hearing about democracy, yet ordinary people are expected to sit quietly while one leader is swapped for another and nothing fundamentally changes. And if we keep accepting it, why would they stop? Why would they listen? Why would anything improve? We'll just keep moving from one disappointment to the next while being told this time will be different. At some point, people need to stop accepting whatever they're given and start demanding a voice in the decisions that affect their lives. Because if nobody speaks up, don't be surprised when the same thing keeps happening over and over again. So here I am, speaking out. Now it's your turn. Because if you don't make sure you're heard, nothing changes. Politicians won't suddenly wake up tomorrow and start listening. They'll keep doing exactly what they've been doing for years. And we'll keep getting exactly what we've been getting for years. More disappointment. More excuses.More of the same. Britain deserves better. We deserve better. It's time to demand it.

Alex Barnicoat

32,808 views โ€ข 1 month ago

๐Ÿคจ โ€œGaza Is The ONLY Issue That Mattersโ€ Yasmin Alibhai-Brown has once again shown just how detached some public voices have become from the reality facing ordinary people in Britain. During a debate about Prime Minister Andy Burnhamโ€™s listening tour and the urgent questions of what he can and should do about the cost of living crisis and the many other huge problems crushing this country, she declared: โ€œI know Andy and I like him but I still wonโ€™t vote for him because the ONLY issue that matters to me is whatโ€™s heโ€™s going to do on Gaza and he hasnโ€™t answered that.โ€ Not the NHS. Not housing. Not energy bills. Not crime. Not immigration. Not the state of the economy. Just Gaza. This is not principled. It is obsessive. It is a textbook example of someone elevating a distant conflict, however tragic, above the actual, immediate suffering of the people who live here and pay the taxes that keep the lights on. How many more voices like this are there, treating Britain as an afterthought while demanding politicians prioritise foreign policy litmus tests over which they have almost no real control?โ€โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹ When your own country is struggling with stagnant wages, broken public services and a genuine cost of living emergency, announcing that none of it counts unless the politician says the right words about Gaza is just insane to me. You can care about Gaza. Plenty of people do. But when you openly say it is the only thing that matters, and you would reject someone you otherwise like purely on that basis while ignoring everything else, you have stopped talking about politics and started performing purity. And that performance is coming at the expense of the country you actually live in.

J Stewart

66,611 views โ€ข 7 days ago

One billionaire family controls the bridge that carries 25% of all U.S.โ€“Canada trade. The good news? There's a brand new public bridge right next door (and Canada paid for the whole thing). The bad news? Donald Trump won't let it open. Here's the story: For more than a decade, Michigan and Canada worked together to build a new public crossing right next to it โ€” six lanes over the Detroit River, named for a Canadian-born Red Wings legend, built by thousands of union workers. Canada paid the entire bill. Michigan co-owns it. It's finished. Itโ€™s a shining example of international cooperation and collaboration, with a tremendous return for both sides: more jobs, faster trade, and lower costs. So why isn't it open? Because the Moroun family, who own the rival Ambassador Bridge just up the river, doesnโ€™t want the competition. They spent years and tens of millions of dollars trying to stop any competing international crossing from being built or opening. They lost. So they went to the White House instead. In January, Matthew Moroun gave $1 million to a pro-Trump super PAC. Then the billionaire called Trump's Commerce Secretary and, just hours later, Trump suddenly attacked the same publicly owned bridge he praised in his own first term and threatened to block it. Then, the day before the June 12th ribbon-cutting, the opening was called off indefinitely. It's corruption so flagrant it would be laughable if it weren't so damaging. Trump is screwing over Michiganders for the interests of billionaires โ€” holding a finished, publicly owned project hostage to protect one donor's toll booth. So a finished bridge sits closed, Michiganders keep paying the higher tolls, cars and trucks cost more, and a billionaire family keeps its monopoly. Mr. President: stop playing games. Open the damn bridge.

Mallory McMorrow

364,207 views โ€ข 1 month ago

๐Ÿšจ ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ SLAVS ARE DONE BEING DIVIDED โ€” A NEW SLAVIC ERA IS EMERGING The video spreading online is not shocking because of where it comes from, or because of the flags it shows. It resonates because it reveals something many prefer to ignore: ordinary Slavs do not hate each other. What divides us today is not culture, not history, not values โ€” but politics imposed from above, amplified by external interests that profit from fragmentation. Governments change. Strategies shift. Alliances rotate. But people remain. And among ordinary Slavs, the instinct is not hostility โ€” it is recognition. For decades, Slavic nations have been taught to see each other only through the lens of conflict, blame, and permanent suspicion. Entire peoples are judged by the actions of their governments. That logic is not justice โ€” it is collective guilt. And collective guilt, regardless of who applies it, is simply another form of racism. This project rejects that completely. โธป ONE CIVILIZATION, MANY STATES Slavic unity does not mean political uniformity. It does not mean erasing borders or histories. It means acknowledging a shared civilizational space โ€” something every other major culture on the planet openly defends. Western nations coordinate. Middle Eastern cultures coordinate. Asian civilizations coordinate. Only Slavs are told that unity is โ€œdangerousโ€ or โ€œsuspicious.โ€ That narrative has served others well โ€” but it has weakened us. โธป THIS IS NOT ABOUT HATE โ€” IT IS ABOUT SELF-RESPECT Let it be said clearly and without ambiguity: this movement is not anti-Jewish, not anti-Muslim, not anti-any people. We do not oppose identities. We oppose forces, policies, and systems that work against Slavic interests, dignity, and sovereignty. There is nothing extremist about refusing to be divided forever. There is nothing immoral about wanting influence over oneโ€™s own future. โธป WHY THIS MOMENT MATTERS Yes โ€” it is uncomfortable that images of Slavic unity often come from places the West has already labeled for us. That discomfort should not lead to denial. It should lead to action elsewhere. If others can organize their communities across borders, across generations, across institutions โ€” then Slavs can too. Not emotionally. Strategically. And that is precisely what is beginning. โธป A NEW SLAVIC VOICE IS COMING Slavic Networks is stepping into a role that has been missing for too long. From next year, we are launching a studio-based podcast and media platform built by Slavs, for Slavs โ€” independent of external power centers, ideological filters, or imported narratives. Our goal is not commentary alone. It is influence. Cultural influence. Media influence. Political influence. Support for Slavic nations and Slavic minorities at every level of public life. Others built networks to protect their worldview. Others turned belief into organization. Others turned identity into power. It is time Slavs did the same โ€” calmly, professionally, and without apology. โธป THE FUTURE WILL NOT BE GIVEN โ€” IT WILL BE BUILT This is not a call for confrontation. It is a call for coordination. A Slavic world that speaks in its own voice. A Slavic perspective that cannot be ignored. A Slavic future shaped by Slavs โ€” not by those who benefit from our division. History has entered a new phase. So have we. โธป If you like what we are doing โ€” like, share, subscribe, and invite your friends for more. Follow us also on Facebook: Slavic Networks Nirali VVeles SlavicFreeSpirit.

Slavic Networks

86,449 views โ€ข 8 months ago

๐ŸšจByredo Bibliotheque - Blink Twice Epstein Island and in the movie Blink Twice the perfume and the people who used it could not be remember the previous day.. Blink Twice reveals that Frida (Naomi Ackie) and the other women who've been invited to Slater King's (Channing Tatum) private island are having their memories erased โ€” nightly. The psychological thriller's terrifying twist only gets darker when the reasoning behind Slater's memory-erasing scheme comes to light. The billionaire tech mogul and his entourage of male friends โ€” Vic (Christian Slater), Cody (Simon Rex), and Tom (Haley Joel Osment) โ€” take pleasure in abusing and assaulting the women in the group. Erasing the survivors' memories means the men can continue abusing the women without being held accountable. As Blink Twice's ending reiterates, the film is all about power dynamics, and the way those with power have absolute control over those without it. At the start of Zoรซ Kravitz's directorial debut, Frida and her best friend, Jess (Alia Shawkat), are exhausted cocktail waitresses who jump at the chance to party with a billionaire. As the film goes on, it becomes increasingly difficult for them to ignore Blink Twice's many hints or dismiss their memory gaps as the fallout of drugs and binge-drinking. Soon enough, Frida, Jess, and Sarah (Adria Arjona) realize just how much danger they're in.
0:13

Sensitive content

๐ŸšจByredo Bibliotheque - Blink Twice Epstein Island and in the movie Blink Twice the perfume and the people who used it could not be remember the previous day.. Blink Twice reveals that Frida (Naomi Ackie) and the other women who've been invited to Slater King's (Channing Tatum) private island are having their memories erased โ€” nightly. The psychological thriller's terrifying twist only gets darker when the reasoning behind Slater's memory-erasing scheme comes to light. The billionaire tech mogul and his entourage of male friends โ€” Vic (Christian Slater), Cody (Simon Rex), and Tom (Haley Joel Osment) โ€” take pleasure in abusing and assaulting the women in the group. Erasing the survivors' memories means the men can continue abusing the women without being held accountable. As Blink Twice's ending reiterates, the film is all about power dynamics, and the way those with power have absolute control over those without it. At the start of Zoรซ Kravitz's directorial debut, Frida and her best friend, Jess (Alia Shawkat), are exhausted cocktail waitresses who jump at the chance to party with a billionaire. As the film goes on, it becomes increasingly difficult for them to ignore Blink Twice's many hints or dismiss their memory gaps as the fallout of drugs and binge-drinking. Soon enough, Frida, Jess, and Sarah (Adria Arjona) realize just how much danger they're in.

SANTINO

91,133 views โ€ข 5 months ago

Europe is quietly becoming what the United States once promised the world. More and more people are looking at their best years ahead and choosing a place where everyday life is designed to work. Where the future feels stable enough to plan for. Where safety is not a luxury product. Where you can build a good life without gambling your health, your family, or your dignity on one bad month. In much of Europe, the โ€œdreamโ€ is not about becoming a billionaire. It is about becoming unafraid. It is the freedom of walking home at night without scanning every shadow. The comfort of knowing that if you get sick, you do not need to calculate whether you can afford to be treated. The relief of having a society that still believes children should carry backpacks, not trauma, and definitely not weapons. The calm of streets built for human beings, not just cars. The ability to take a holiday without feeling like you are committing career suicide. The basic decency of labor protections that assume you are a person first and a resource second. And then there is the part people underestimate until they live it: the texture of life. The cities are older and more beautiful than you expect. The distances are smaller. Weekends are real. Food is real. Public spaces are not just decorative, they are functional. Parks are full. Cafes are full. Trains take you somewhere, often across borders, without turning travel into a stress test. You can live in one country, work with another, and visit a third like it is normal because, in many places, it is. The European dream is also a quiet confidence in the social contract. That if you contribute, the system does not abandon you. That you can raise a family without feeling like you are one accident away from ruin. That โ€œgetting aheadโ€ does not require burning out. That a good society is one where normal people can live normal lives and still feel proud of them. This is why more and more Americans are not just visiting Europe, but staying. Some come for studies and never leave. Some arrive for a job and realise the lifestyle is the real promotion. Some originally planned a one year experiment and then cannot imagine going back to a place where stress is treated as a personality trait and insecurity is marketed as freedom. Europe is not perfect. It has bureaucracy. It has politics. It has problems that deserve criticism. But in many European countries, life is still built around a simple idea: society should reduce fear, not monetise it. That is the new dream. And people can feel it the moment they arrive. If you could choose one thing to trade for a better life, what would it be: more income, or more security? And what do you think your country would have to change for people to stop leaving, and start staying? Stay connected, Follow Gandalv Gandalv

Gandalv

989,023 views โ€ข 5 months ago