Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Sen. DURBIN: Jack Smith is not hiding. He is not avoiding testimony under oath. Jack Smith volunteered to come before our committee, but the Chairman didn’t take advantage of it. All Republicans need to do is push the open door.

Senate Judiciary Democrats 🇺🇸

111,282 subscribers

42,019 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

"If this is worse than Watergate, isn't it about time we get to the primary source: Jack Smith under oath?" -- Durbin points out the ridiculousness of Republicans holding conspiracy hearings about Jack Smith while refusing to allow him to testify on camera

"If this is worse than Watergate, isn't it about time we get to the primary source: Jack Smith under oath?" -- Durbin points out the ridiculousness of Republicans holding conspiracy hearings about Jack Smith while refusing to allow him to testify on camera

Aaron Rupar

307,777 views • 5 months ago

Sen. DURBIN: If Republicans are so concerned about Jack Smith issuing subpoenas for phone records when Donald Trump tried overturning the 2020 election, they should call Smith to testify under oath before us in an open hearing. He’s offered.

Sen. DURBIN: If Republicans are so concerned about Jack Smith issuing subpoenas for phone records when Donald Trump tried overturning the 2020 election, they should call Smith to testify under oath before us in an open hearing. He’s offered.

Senate Judiciary Democrats 🇺🇸

153,278 views • 7 months ago

🚨 WOW! A stunning revelation that Special Counsel Jack Smith SPIED ON the content of text messages of US Senators is resulting in calls for Smith to be prosecuted Smith surveilled over 40 LAWMAKERS, mostly GOP PERJURY! He likely LIED TO CONGRESS: Smith said "no," he didn't spy on text messages, but he DID "Some are now accusing Jack Smith of LYING UNDER OATH." Jack Smith is a dirty deep stater. Prosecute him NOW!

🚨 WOW! A stunning revelation that Special Counsel Jack Smith SPIED ON the content of text messages of US Senators is resulting in calls for Smith to be prosecuted Smith surveilled over 40 LAWMAKERS, mostly GOP PERJURY! He likely LIED TO CONGRESS: Smith said "no," he didn't spy on text messages, but he DID "Some are now accusing Jack Smith of LYING UNDER OATH." Jack Smith is a dirty deep stater. Prosecute him NOW!

Eric Daugherty

40,632 views • 1 month ago

WATCH: Senator Dick Durbin points out Jack Smith volunteered to testify but Republicans don’t want him to 🤔 (because they’re afraid of what he’d have to say about Trump trying to overthrow our government)

WATCH: Senator Dick Durbin points out Jack Smith volunteered to testify but Republicans don’t want him to 🤔 (because they’re afraid of what he’d have to say about Trump trying to overthrow our government)

The Tennessee Holler

43,519 views • 1 month ago

Jack Smith testified under oath that he did not spy on Members of Congress and didn’t read their text messages. Bombshell new DOJ documents just revealed Smith and his team reviewed the communications of 44 Members of Congress. Lying to Congress Under Oath is called perjury and is a felony under 18 U.S. Code 1001 §§ 1621, which carries a punishment of up to five years in prison. Smith must be charged.

Jack Smith testified under oath that he did not spy on Members of Congress and didn’t read their text messages. Bombshell new DOJ documents just revealed Smith and his team reviewed the communications of 44 Members of Congress. Lying to Congress Under Oath is called perjury and is a felony under 18 U.S. Code 1001 §§ 1621, which carries a punishment of up to five years in prison. Smith must be charged.

Benny Johnson

227,892 views • 1 month ago

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Jack Smith’s Team Spied on TEXT MESSAGES of 44 Members of Congress — Including Republicans AND Democrats New records show Smith’s probe scooped up communications from over 40 lawmakers (mostly Republicans, but also Cory Booker and Karen Bass) during the Trump investigation. Sen. Chuck Grassley dropped the receipts. Republicans are furious, accusing Smith of lying under oath in a December deposition when he claimed they didn’t collect text messages. Sen. Rand Paul: “Jack Smith swore under oath he didn't spy on text messages... Today, new evidence confirms he spied on dozens of members of Congress, myself included. This is a blatant abuse of power.” Sen. Josh Hawley: “It looks like perjury.” Congress now planning to drag Smith back for a public hearing. Weaponization of government at its finest. Time for full accountability. TIME TO PROSECUTE JACK SMITH!

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Jack Smith’s Team Spied on TEXT MESSAGES of 44 Members of Congress — Including Republicans AND Democrats New records show Smith’s probe scooped up communications from over 40 lawmakers (mostly Republicans, but also Cory Booker and Karen Bass) during the Trump investigation. Sen. Chuck Grassley dropped the receipts. Republicans are furious, accusing Smith of lying under oath in a December deposition when he claimed they didn’t collect text messages. Sen. Rand Paul: “Jack Smith swore under oath he didn't spy on text messages... Today, new evidence confirms he spied on dozens of members of Congress, myself included. This is a blatant abuse of power.” Sen. Josh Hawley: “It looks like perjury.” Congress now planning to drag Smith back for a public hearing. Weaponization of government at its finest. Time for full accountability. TIME TO PROSECUTE JACK SMITH!

Gunther Eagleman™

49,382 views • 1 month ago

Republicans fought to have the Jack Smith testimony made public. Now, they stopped talking about it. Why? Because he spelled it out in plain english. Trump is a criminal.

Republicans fought to have the Jack Smith testimony made public. Now, they stopped talking about it. Why? Because he spelled it out in plain english. Trump is a criminal.

The Green Dragon Tavern

90,858 views • 7 months ago

🇺🇸 SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM: JACK SMITH WANTING TO KNOW WHO I CALLED IS BEYOND UNNERVING “We have checks and balances in our country. I was the chairman of the Judiciary Committee in January of 2021. I made phone calls to a lot of people to find out what I should do as a senator regarding certifying the election and whether or not as chairman of the committee we should have hearings. To find out that Jack Smith, in 2023, wants to know who I called and where I was is beyond unnerving.” Source: Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

🇺🇸 SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM: JACK SMITH WANTING TO KNOW WHO I CALLED IS BEYOND UNNERVING “We have checks and balances in our country. I was the chairman of the Judiciary Committee in January of 2021. I made phone calls to a lot of people to find out what I should do as a senator regarding certifying the election and whether or not as chairman of the committee we should have hearings. To find out that Jack Smith, in 2023, wants to know who I called and where I was is beyond unnerving.” Source: Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

Mario Nawfal

116,289 views • 10 months ago

Lying under oath to congress is a crime and Fauci is guilty of it.. he said that he did not fund Gain of Function at the Wuhan lab He lied to Rand Paul during his testimony Twitter under Jack Dorsey took this video down.... so you know what to do

Lying under oath to congress is a crime and Fauci is guilty of it.. he said that he did not fund Gain of Function at the Wuhan lab He lied to Rand Paul during his testimony Twitter under Jack Dorsey took this video down.... so you know what to do

@Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸

270,921 views • 1 year ago

“You had the January 6th committee to find out information, they handed that over to jack Smith but then destroyed evidence so that Republicans could not look through it…”

“You had the January 6th committee to find out information, they handed that over to jack Smith but then destroyed evidence so that Republicans could not look through it…”

Acyn

1,435,616 views • 3 years ago

Yesterday Jack Smith said under oath to the House Judiciary Committee that he had evidence that proves without a doubt that Trump broke the law in his attempt to overthrow our free and fair election. Below is the full J6 indictment. An indictment by 12 grand jurors, not Biden.

Yesterday Jack Smith said under oath to the House Judiciary Committee that he had evidence that proves without a doubt that Trump broke the law in his attempt to overthrow our free and fair election. Below is the full J6 indictment. An indictment by 12 grand jurors, not Biden.

AnthonyAndrews

186,316 views • 8 months ago

Jack Smith: "My fear is that we have seen the rule of law function in our country for so long that many of us have come to take it for granted. The rule of law is not self-executing. It depends on our collective commitment to apply it."

Jack Smith: "My fear is that we have seen the rule of law function in our country for so long that many of us have come to take it for granted. The rule of law is not self-executing. It depends on our collective commitment to apply it."

The Bulwark

19,566 views • 7 months ago

Jack Smith is praying that Trump will subpoena him because then he can pull out all his secret weapons against Trump he couldn’t use before! Jack Smith is not a person that backs down or is afraid of anyone! 👇👇👇

Jack Smith is praying that Trump will subpoena him because then he can pull out all his secret weapons against Trump he couldn’t use before! Jack Smith is not a person that backs down or is afraid of anyone! 👇👇👇

Suzie rizzio

24,707 views • 9 months ago

JACK SMITH TO TESTIFY PUBLICLY “Tomorrow, ex-special counsel Jack Smith will testify publicly before the House Judiciary Committee…If anyone better represents the vengeful, reckless, punitive, destructive lawfare against Donald Trump and his associates…It is special counsel Jack Smith.” -Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 details for Bannon’s WarRoom.

JACK SMITH TO TESTIFY PUBLICLY “Tomorrow, ex-special counsel Jack Smith will testify publicly before the House Judiciary Committee…If anyone better represents the vengeful, reckless, punitive, destructive lawfare against Donald Trump and his associates…It is special counsel Jack Smith.” -Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 details for Bannon’s WarRoom.

Real America's Voice (RAV)

14,664 views • 7 months ago

Fun MAGA facts: *Jack Smith wanted to testify publicly. Republicans said “No” *Gym Jordan “can’t get into details” because they exonerate Smith and implicate Trump. *The transcript will not be made public. *Jack Smith never took the 5th. *Trump is a pedo.

Fun MAGA facts: Jack Smith wanted to testify publicly. Republicans said “No” Gym Jordan “can’t get into details” because they exonerate Smith and implicate Trump. The transcript will not be made public. Jack Smith never took the 5th. *Trump is a pedo.

BigBlueWaveUSA2026® 🇺🇸🌊🇺🇦

163,625 views • 8 months ago

Sen. DURBIN: We all need to tone down our rhetoric. You’ve come before this committee saying political violence is all on one side. I disagree. Senate Republican: I’m not backing down. Durbin: You ought to investigate all political violence. Investigate both sides.

Sen. DURBIN: We all need to tone down our rhetoric. You’ve come before this committee saying political violence is all on one side. I disagree. Senate Republican: I’m not backing down. Durbin: You ought to investigate all political violence. Investigate both sides.

Senate Judiciary Democrats 🇺🇸

601,862 views • 10 months ago

Remember, Jack Smith is NOT an independent counsel. He's a special counsel, answerable to AG Merrick Garland and ultimately to Joe Biden above him. Joe Biden made it clear that he wanted Jack Smith to prosecute Trump over J6. What do we have? Jack Smith prosecuting DOnald Trump over J6! This is not a DOJ investigation of a potential criminal. It is an American president prosecuting his chief political rival. Election interference!

Remember, Jack Smith is NOT an independent counsel. He's a special counsel, answerable to AG Merrick Garland and ultimately to Joe Biden above him. Joe Biden made it clear that he wanted Jack Smith to prosecute Trump over J6. What do we have? Jack Smith prosecuting DOnald Trump over J6! This is not a DOJ investigation of a potential criminal. It is an American president prosecuting his chief political rival. Election interference!

Charlie Kirk

578,773 views • 3 years ago

#BREAKING: Alex Witt: “…House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan…on Wednesday, referred former special counsel Jack Smith to the Justice Department for possible criminal prosecution. He alleges Smith knowingly made false statements during testimony about his team’s access to lawmakers phone records during the January 6th investigation…top Judiciary Democrat Jamie Raskin said if the referral is ever brought before a judge, it will get laughed out of court. Is Raskin right?” Rep Lieu: “Well, let me first say that gas prices are up, grocery prices are up, inflation is up and House Republicans are focused on going after the president’s perceived enemies. That’s actually what is happening, and in this case, it is an absurd attack because under the law, there is no obligation for a witness to volunteer information. And in this case, Jack Smith simply didn’t volunteer some information, but the House Republicans can’t point to a single statement that Jack Smith made that was false. And so Jamie Raskin, who is an amazing leader of our House Judiciary Committee is absolutely correct, this is gonna be laughed out of court.” 😳

#BREAKING: Alex Witt: “…House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan…on Wednesday, referred former special counsel Jack Smith to the Justice Department for possible criminal prosecution. He alleges Smith knowingly made false statements during testimony about his team’s access to lawmakers phone records during the January 6th investigation…top Judiciary Democrat Jamie Raskin said if the referral is ever brought before a judge, it will get laughed out of court. Is Raskin right?” Rep Lieu: “Well, let me first say that gas prices are up, grocery prices are up, inflation is up and House Republicans are focused on going after the president’s perceived enemies. That’s actually what is happening, and in this case, it is an absurd attack because under the law, there is no obligation for a witness to volunteer information. And in this case, Jack Smith simply didn’t volunteer some information, but the House Republicans can’t point to a single statement that Jack Smith made that was false. And so Jamie Raskin, who is an amazing leader of our House Judiciary Committee is absolutely correct, this is gonna be laughed out of court.” 😳

Emoluments Clause

25,860 views • 1 month ago

.Rep. Dan Goldman taunts Rep. Jordan to call Jack Smith for testimony: “I’m eager for all of them to come and testify. I urge Chairman Jordan to actually get to the bottom of allegations… We saw what happened with the impeachment investigation in the Oversight Committee.”

.Rep. Dan Goldman taunts Rep. Jordan to call Jack Smith for testimony: “I’m eager for all of them to come and testify. I urge Chairman Jordan to actually get to the bottom of allegations… We saw what happened with the impeachment investigation in the Oversight Committee.”

The Briefing with Jen Psaki

160,979 views • 1 year ago

'Jack does not look at cases in terms of Republicans and Democrats. He looks at it in terms of evidence and proof.' Former colleague of Jack Smith weighs in on the former special counsel's testimony on Capitol Hill.

'Jack does not look at cases in terms of Republicans and Democrats. He looks at it in terms of evidence and proof.' Former colleague of Jack Smith weighs in on the former special counsel's testimony on Capitol Hill.

The Lead CNN

30,688 views • 7 months ago