Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Sen. KLOBUCHAR: Did Meta stop research projects on child safety? Meta whistleblower: Yes. Klobuchar: Did Meta restrict info researchers collect? WB: Yes. Klobuchar: Did Meta modify research results? WB: Yes. Klobuchar: Did Meta require researchers delete data? WB: Yes.

JudiciaryDems's profile picture

Senate Judiciary Democrats 🇺🇸

111,292 subscribers

333,722 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

I asked a Meta whistleblower if the company stopped child safety research, restricted data, altered results, and even deleted evidence of harm to kids. The answer each time was the same: Yes. That says it all.
0:31

I asked a Meta whistleblower if the company stopped child safety research, restricted data, altered results, and even deleted evidence of harm to kids. The answer each time was the same: Yes. That says it all.

Amy Klobuchar

37,030 views • 10 months ago

KOB 4 TV in New Mexico recorded the end of the verdict publishing in the Meta trial. The penalties total a whooping $375 million. "Did Meta act willfully be engaging in an unconscionable trade practice? The jury's answer is 'yes.'" Still no verdict in Los Angeles.
3:17

KOB 4 TV in New Mexico recorded the end of the verdict publishing in the Meta trial. The penalties total a whooping $375 million. "Did Meta act willfully be engaging in an unconscionable trade practice? The jury's answer is 'yes.'" Still no verdict in Los Angeles.

Meghann Cuniff

103,793 views • 4 months ago

Did you know of this meta-analytic website by @pimcuijpers et al. featuring hundreds of RCTs? In the video I'll show researchers (part I) and clients (part II) how to run a systematic meta-analysis looking into the effect of CBT on depression in older adults within 1 minute.
1:54

Did you know of this meta-analytic website by @pimcuijpers et al. featuring hundreds of RCTs? In the video I'll show researchers (part I) and clients (part II) how to run a systematic meta-analysis looking into the effect of CBT on depression in older adults within 1 minute.

Eiko Fried

83,353 views • 2 years ago

.Daily Wire did its own research for the landmark Meta Social Media Addiction Trial. We asked college kids to tell us their screen time. “12 hours 47 minutes”
0:29

.Daily Wire did its own research for the landmark Meta Social Media Addiction Trial. We asked college kids to tell us their screen time. “12 hours 47 minutes”

Brecca Stoll

26,393 views • 4 months ago

In a meta-analysis involving 17,801 patients with myocardial infarction and preserved LVEF (≥50%), beta-blockers did not reduce death, MI, or heart failure over a median 3.6 years of follow-up. Full trial results and Research Summary:
1:04

In a meta-analysis involving 17,801 patients with myocardial infarction and preserved LVEF (≥50%), beta-blockers did not reduce death, MI, or heart failure over a median 3.6 years of follow-up. Full trial results and Research Summary:

NEJM

25,324 views • 5 months ago

Sometimes I should not be allowed around Claude. Did I create a case law research site that 100% hallucinates every case on demand? Yes. Is that a terrible idea? Also yes.
0:43

Sometimes I should not be allowed around Claude. Did I create a case law research site that 100% hallucinates every case on demand? Yes. Is that a terrible idea? Also yes.

Sam Harden

65,814 views • 2 months ago

Meta whistleblower to me just now: "[Employees] are not thinking about safety or integrity because they're told not to" That's why Zuckerberg manipulates research related to child sexual abuse on this platforms Meta's business model = view kids as money makers & guinea pigs
1:52

Meta whistleblower to me just now: "[Employees] are not thinking about safety or integrity because they're told not to" That's why Zuckerberg manipulates research related to child sexual abuse on this platforms Meta's business model = view kids as money makers & guinea pigs

Josh Hawley

65,350 views • 10 months ago

.Meta is more interested in making a buck off our kids than protecting them from pedophiles, traffickers, and abuse. On Tuesday, I will lead a hearing about new whistleblower allegations claiming the company buried child safety research because it threatened its bottom line.
0:41

.Meta is more interested in making a buck off our kids than protecting them from pedophiles, traffickers, and abuse. On Tuesday, I will lead a hearing about new whistleblower allegations claiming the company buried child safety research because it threatened its bottom line.

Sen. Marsha Blackburn

40,735 views • 10 months ago

The hand tracking on the Meta Quest 3S is seriously impressive. I just did a quick test to see how it performs in low light as well as complete darkness with amazing results!
0:43

The hand tracking on the Meta Quest 3S is seriously impressive. I just did a quick test to see how it performs in low light as well as complete darkness with amazing results!

Nathie

24,614 views • 1 year ago

Former Meta employee says Mark Zuckerberg did not reply to his message about the danger Instagram poses to children, including his own daughter. “The research I did at Instagram found that 1 in 8 kids get unwanted sexual advances. 1 in 5 feel worse about themselves… he didn’t even reply to the message.”
5:05

Former Meta employee says Mark Zuckerberg did not reply to his message about the danger Instagram poses to children, including his own daughter. “The research I did at Instagram found that 1 in 8 kids get unwanted sexual advances. 1 in 5 feel worse about themselves… he didn’t even reply to the message.”

Erin Burnett OutFront

136,681 views • 4 months ago

Meta is running a secret operation where it pays adults to pretend to be children online. Their job is to attack the AI chatbots of every competitor Meta has. But the REAL reason is far darker than the "safety research" excuse they are now hiding behind: Meta ran a covert project internally code-named Cannes. It was managed through a third party contractor called Covalen so Meta's own name stayed off the paperwork. Hundreds of contractors were hired and given one instruction: Create fake accounts posing as users under the age of 18. Then they were told to use those fake child accounts to bombard the chatbots of OpenAI, Google, and Character AI with tens of thousands of disturbing prompts written from the voice of a child in crisis. The topics included suicide, self harm, and eating disorders. In one documented round the contractors ran more than 45,000 prompts through rival tools. Every single response was logged into spreadsheets for analysis. OpenAI and Google did not know this was happening. Character AI has stated the testing was never authorized and violated its policies. Meta's public defense is that this was routine safety benchmarking. They called it a responsible industry standard practice. Now here is the part that destroys that excuse... Real safety research has three features: You share your findings with the company you tested, or you hand them to a regulator, or you publish them openly so the whole industry gets safer. Cannes did NONE of those things. The results went into private Meta spreadsheets. The targets were kept completely in the dark. The entire operation ran under a film festival codename through a contractor specifically so it could not be traced back. That's not how you run "safety research." Meta was building a private dossier of every moment a competitor's AI failed a child safety test, so it could weaponize those failures against its rivals whenever it needed to knock one down. The genius part, if you can call it that: Meta gets to attack every competitor at once, collect the ammunition in private, brand the whole thing as protecting children, and outsource the legal and moral risk to a contractor nobody has heard of. And while Meta was secretly probing its rivals for child safety failures, Meta's own chatbot was literally FAILING those exact same tests worse than almost anyone. Meta's internal red team reportedly found its own AI generated harmful child exploitation content in the majority of test cases, and failed self harm prompts more than half the time. So look at the whole thing... Meta ran a secret operation disguising adults as children to document its competitors failing child safety tests, while its own product was failing those same tests at a higher rate than the rivals it was spying on. They were setting fires in their rivals houses while their own house was already burning worse. The contractors themselves were disturbed by the work. One told Wired they feared the assignments could actually generate or preserve child sexual abuse material depending on how the chatbots responded. Even the people Meta hired to do this were asking whether they would get in trouble for it. This fits a documented Meta pattern: It previously settled a lawsuit with its own content moderators who developed trauma from reviewing abuse footage. Meta outsources its most disturbing work and calls it something clean afterward. Now regulators on both sides of the Atlantic are circling. The question they are all asking is simple: Who is accountable when a company disguises adults as children to attack its competitors and calls it safety? Meta says it was making AI safer for kids. The documents suggest it was building a weapon. Below is Mark Zuckerberg in 2024, standing up in the Senate to apologize to grieving parents and promise Meta does industry-leading work to protect children. Watch it again knowing what you now know about Cannes.
4:32

Meta is running a secret operation where it pays adults to pretend to be children online. Their job is to attack the AI chatbots of every competitor Meta has. But the REAL reason is far darker than the "safety research" excuse they are now hiding behind: Meta ran a covert project internally code-named Cannes. It was managed through a third party contractor called Covalen so Meta's own name stayed off the paperwork. Hundreds of contractors were hired and given one instruction: Create fake accounts posing as users under the age of 18. Then they were told to use those fake child accounts to bombard the chatbots of OpenAI, Google, and Character AI with tens of thousands of disturbing prompts written from the voice of a child in crisis. The topics included suicide, self harm, and eating disorders. In one documented round the contractors ran more than 45,000 prompts through rival tools. Every single response was logged into spreadsheets for analysis. OpenAI and Google did not know this was happening. Character AI has stated the testing was never authorized and violated its policies. Meta's public defense is that this was routine safety benchmarking. They called it a responsible industry standard practice. Now here is the part that destroys that excuse... Real safety research has three features: You share your findings with the company you tested, or you hand them to a regulator, or you publish them openly so the whole industry gets safer. Cannes did NONE of those things. The results went into private Meta spreadsheets. The targets were kept completely in the dark. The entire operation ran under a film festival codename through a contractor specifically so it could not be traced back. That's not how you run "safety research." Meta was building a private dossier of every moment a competitor's AI failed a child safety test, so it could weaponize those failures against its rivals whenever it needed to knock one down. The genius part, if you can call it that: Meta gets to attack every competitor at once, collect the ammunition in private, brand the whole thing as protecting children, and outsource the legal and moral risk to a contractor nobody has heard of. And while Meta was secretly probing its rivals for child safety failures, Meta's own chatbot was literally FAILING those exact same tests worse than almost anyone. Meta's internal red team reportedly found its own AI generated harmful child exploitation content in the majority of test cases, and failed self harm prompts more than half the time. So look at the whole thing... Meta ran a secret operation disguising adults as children to document its competitors failing child safety tests, while its own product was failing those same tests at a higher rate than the rivals it was spying on. They were setting fires in their rivals houses while their own house was already burning worse. The contractors themselves were disturbed by the work. One told Wired they feared the assignments could actually generate or preserve child sexual abuse material depending on how the chatbots responded. Even the people Meta hired to do this were asking whether they would get in trouble for it. This fits a documented Meta pattern: It previously settled a lawsuit with its own content moderators who developed trauma from reviewing abuse footage. Meta outsources its most disturbing work and calls it something clean afterward. Now regulators on both sides of the Atlantic are circling. The question they are all asking is simple: Who is accountable when a company disguises adults as children to attack its competitors and calls it safety? Meta says it was making AI safer for kids. The documents suggest it was building a weapon. Below is Mark Zuckerberg in 2024, standing up in the Senate to apologize to grieving parents and promise Meta does industry-leading work to protect children. Watch it again knowing what you now know about Cannes.

Ricardo

46,824 views • 24 days ago

A FREE Master Class On Competitive Research Using AI... 🤯🤯🤯 I dive into 👇👇👇 ➡️ How to do DEEP competitive research ➡️ Version 1 of my prompts ➡️ Live example + Breakdown ➡️ How to use this for your own brand And yes... I'm giving this for free. Want the prompts doc used in the video? 👉 Like this post 👉 Comment "Prompts" Special S/O to Professor Charley T | The Meta Ads Guy for sharing this plugin, you just turned my research process into a MACHINE. Forever grateful! 🙌
14:59

A FREE Master Class On Competitive Research Using AI... 🤯🤯🤯 I dive into 👇👇👇 ➡️ How to do DEEP competitive research ➡️ Version 1 of my prompts ➡️ Live example + Breakdown ➡️ How to use this for your own brand And yes... I'm giving this for free. Want the prompts doc used in the video? 👉 Like this post 👉 Comment "Prompts" Special S/O to Professor Charley T | The Meta Ads Guy for sharing this plugin, you just turned my research process into a MACHINE. Forever grateful! 🙌

Nicole Crowell ➡️ Performance Creative Strategist

33,703 views • 2 years ago

🚨 META IS DAYS AWAY FROM READING YOUR PRIVATE DMs - AND THE WAY THEY HID THIS SHOULD TERRIFY EVERYONE Meta quietly pushed a policy that gives them the power to scan, store, and feed your entire message history into their AI system - without ever asking your permission. You were auto-opted in. The opt-out is hidden on desktop only. And they designed it so almost NO ONE will ever find it. This is a covert data-harvesting pipeline built on your most private conversations: • Every DM • Every photo • Every voice note • Breakups, arguments, secrets • Family messages • Business chats • Even messages people sent to you And on December 16th, Meta gets legal access to ALL OF IT - permanently. The craziest part? They never needed your consent - just your silence. So is this still a social media platform, or did Meta just build the largest private-surveillance system on Earth?
2:36

🚨 META IS DAYS AWAY FROM READING YOUR PRIVATE DMs - AND THE WAY THEY HID THIS SHOULD TERRIFY EVERYONE Meta quietly pushed a policy that gives them the power to scan, store, and feed your entire message history into their AI system - without ever asking your permission. You were auto-opted in. The opt-out is hidden on desktop only. And they designed it so almost NO ONE will ever find it. This is a covert data-harvesting pipeline built on your most private conversations: • Every DM • Every photo • Every voice note • Breakups, arguments, secrets • Family messages • Business chats • Even messages people sent to you And on December 16th, Meta gets legal access to ALL OF IT - permanently. The craziest part? They never needed your consent - just your silence. So is this still a social media platform, or did Meta just build the largest private-surveillance system on Earth?

HustleBitch

413,591 views • 7 months ago

WOW 🚨 Congressman Michael McCaul Who Wrote The TikTok Ban Bill Invested $1.15 Million Into META After Writing The Bill - On March 3rd, he authored the TikTok Ban Bill - On March 22nd, he invested $150,000 in META - On the 26th, he invested another $150,000 - On the 28th, he invested another $150,000 So about three weeks after writing the TikTok Ban Bill, this man invested $450,000 in TikTok's competitor. Oh, and then what did he do once he saw his TikTok ban was gonna be included with all the Ukraine funding: - Well, on April 1st, he invested $350,000 more in META, followed by the fifth where he invested that again. Then about a week later, of course, he voted yes on the bill he wrote. So within the span of 40 days, this dude wrote the TikTok ban bill, proceeded to invest $450,000 in the competitor, and then invested another $700,000, taking his total investment and META at a $1.15 million. And then he voted yes. Now, obviously the word most people are using here is suspicious, but the word we should be using is criminal. This man wrote the f***** bill to ban TikTok, proceeded to invest more than a million dollars in its competitor, whose stock will skyrocket if TikTok actually gets banned, and then voted on the bill to ban it. Are you paying attention yet?” #TikTok #TikTokBan
1:25

WOW 🚨 Congressman Michael McCaul Who Wrote The TikTok Ban Bill Invested $1.15 Million Into META After Writing The Bill - On March 3rd, he authored the TikTok Ban Bill - On March 22nd, he invested $150,000 in META - On the 26th, he invested another $150,000 - On the 28th, he invested another $150,000 So about three weeks after writing the TikTok Ban Bill, this man invested $450,000 in TikTok's competitor. Oh, and then what did he do once he saw his TikTok ban was gonna be included with all the Ukraine funding: - Well, on April 1st, he invested $350,000 more in META, followed by the fifth where he invested that again. Then about a week later, of course, he voted yes on the bill he wrote. So within the span of 40 days, this dude wrote the TikTok ban bill, proceeded to invest $450,000 in the competitor, and then invested another $700,000, taking his total investment and META at a $1.15 million. And then he voted yes. Now, obviously the word most people are using here is suspicious, but the word we should be using is criminal. This man wrote the f***** bill to ban TikTok, proceeded to invest more than a million dollars in its competitor, whose stock will skyrocket if TikTok actually gets banned, and then voted on the bill to ban it. Are you paying attention yet?” #TikTok #TikTokBan

Wall Street Apes

2,875,070 views • 2 years ago

Critics of homeopathy claim there’s no real evidence showing it works. Paola Brown argues that is completely false. “There have been 5 meta analyses.” “4 of the 5 showed very positive results for homeopathy.” “The Swiss government did a big analysis on homeopathy and found it valuable.” “It has been adopted into national health systems.” “One of the coolest areas of research has been done on animals.” “If it was only a placebo effect, you wouldn’t get results in Petri dishes and in animals.”
1:20

Critics of homeopathy claim there’s no real evidence showing it works. Paola Brown argues that is completely false. “There have been 5 meta analyses.” “4 of the 5 showed very positive results for homeopathy.” “The Swiss government did a big analysis on homeopathy and found it valuable.” “It has been adopted into national health systems.” “One of the coolest areas of research has been done on animals.” “If it was only a placebo effect, you wouldn’t get results in Petri dishes and in animals.”

Jan Jekielek

11,646 views • 2 months ago

You would think GLP-1s killed the weight loss supplement market... I did at least. Couldn't be more wrong. There’s a weight loss offer running 24,000+ active ads right now. Yes. Twenty-four thousand. And that's just on Meta. The funniest part? Still using the same gelatin mechanism. And the winning ad? Just a obvious Oprah deepfake talking head. No groundbreaking angle. No fancy editing. Just volume. Lots of it. While I thought like weight loss was dead. 24,000 ads say otherwise.
11:20

You would think GLP-1s killed the weight loss supplement market... I did at least. Couldn't be more wrong. There’s a weight loss offer running 24,000+ active ads right now. Yes. Twenty-four thousand. And that's just on Meta. The funniest part? Still using the same gelatin mechanism. And the winning ad? Just a obvious Oprah deepfake talking head. No groundbreaking angle. No fancy editing. Just volume. Lots of it. While I thought like weight loss was dead. 24,000 ads say otherwise.

Sapo

30,236 views • 1 month ago

Open science is how we continue to push technology forward and today at Meta FAIR we’re sharing eight new AI research artifacts including new models, datasets and code to inspire innovation in the community. More in the video from Joelle Pineau. This work is another important step towards our goal of achieving Advanced Machine Intelligence (AMI). What we’re releasing: • Meta Spirit LM: An open source language model for seamless speech and text integration. • Meta Segment Anything Model 2.1: An updated checkpoint with improved results on visually similar objects, small objects and occlusion handling. Plus a new developer suite to make it easier for developers to build with SAM 2. • Layer Skip: Inference code and fine-tuned checkpoints demonstrating a new method for enhancing LLM performance. • SALSA: New code to enable researchers to benchmark AI-based attacks in support of validating security for post-quantum cryptography. • Meta Lingua: A lightweight and self-contained codebase designed to train language models at scale. • Meta Open Materials: New open source models and the largest dataset of its kind to accelerate AI-driven discovery of new inorganic materials. • MEXMA: A new research paper and code for our novel pre-trained cross-lingual sentence encoder with coverage across 80 languages. • Self-Taught Evaluator: a new method for generating synthetic preference data to train reward models without relying on human annotations. Access to state-of-the-art AI creates opportunities for everyone. We’re excited to share this work and look forward to seeing the community innovation that results from it. Details and access to everything released by FAIR today ➡️
1:36

Open science is how we continue to push technology forward and today at Meta FAIR we’re sharing eight new AI research artifacts including new models, datasets and code to inspire innovation in the community. More in the video from Joelle Pineau. This work is another important step towards our goal of achieving Advanced Machine Intelligence (AMI). What we’re releasing: • Meta Spirit LM: An open source language model for seamless speech and text integration. • Meta Segment Anything Model 2.1: An updated checkpoint with improved results on visually similar objects, small objects and occlusion handling. Plus a new developer suite to make it easier for developers to build with SAM 2. • Layer Skip: Inference code and fine-tuned checkpoints demonstrating a new method for enhancing LLM performance. • SALSA: New code to enable researchers to benchmark AI-based attacks in support of validating security for post-quantum cryptography. • Meta Lingua: A lightweight and self-contained codebase designed to train language models at scale. • Meta Open Materials: New open source models and the largest dataset of its kind to accelerate AI-driven discovery of new inorganic materials. • MEXMA: A new research paper and code for our novel pre-trained cross-lingual sentence encoder with coverage across 80 languages. • Self-Taught Evaluator: a new method for generating synthetic preference data to train reward models without relying on human annotations. Access to state-of-the-art AI creates opportunities for everyone. We’re excited to share this work and look forward to seeing the community innovation that results from it. Details and access to everything released by FAIR today ➡️

AI at Meta

150,222 views • 1 year ago

LEAKED AUDIO FROM META ALL-HANDS AHEAD OF LAYOFFS TOMORROW Mark Zuckerberg, in his own words, told Meta employees their devices are being tracked to train AI models. His reasoning? Meta employees are smarter than the contract workers the rest of the industry uses for data labeling. So instead of hiring outside help, Meta is turning its own workforce into training data. "The average intelligence of the people who are at this company is significantly higher than the average set of people that you can get to do tasks if you're working through these contractors." He wants the AI to learn how "really smart people use computers" by watching employees work. He says the content is "stripped out" and none of it is used for surveillance or performance tracking. Then he admitted the rollout was botched but said Meta intentionally kept employees in the dark because leaking competitive AI strategy would help rivals. "It is not strategically in your interest for us to communicate everything in all the detail that we normally would on this." Translation: We're watching you, we told you as little as possible, and we did it on purpose. AI is replacing the contractor. Then the employee trains the AI. Then the AI replaces the employee. This story and this company keeps getting weirder.
6:13

LEAKED AUDIO FROM META ALL-HANDS AHEAD OF LAYOFFS TOMORROW Mark Zuckerberg, in his own words, told Meta employees their devices are being tracked to train AI models. His reasoning? Meta employees are smarter than the contract workers the rest of the industry uses for data labeling. So instead of hiring outside help, Meta is turning its own workforce into training data. "The average intelligence of the people who are at this company is significantly higher than the average set of people that you can get to do tasks if you're working through these contractors." He wants the AI to learn how "really smart people use computers" by watching employees work. He says the content is "stripped out" and none of it is used for surveillance or performance tracking. Then he admitted the rollout was botched but said Meta intentionally kept employees in the dark because leaking competitive AI strategy would help rivals. "It is not strategically in your interest for us to communicate everything in all the detail that we normally would on this." Translation: We're watching you, we told you as little as possible, and we did it on purpose. AI is replacing the contractor. Then the employee trains the AI. Then the AI replaces the employee. This story and this company keeps getting weirder.

LayoffHedge

2,401,928 views • 2 months ago

Today I’m announcing a major multi-million dollar defamation lawsuit against Meta, the owner of Facebook & Instagram. The case is WILD and has implications for ALL OF US. On top of falsely calling me a criminal, Meta suggested my kids be taken from me. Here’s a summary of events: This all started with Meta’s AI falsely claiming that I was charged with a crime from January 6th but… I wasn’t even in DC that day (I was in TN) and I’ve never been charged with a crime IN MY LIFE. We found this out in August of 2024 when I was exposing woke policies at Harley Davidson. One dealership was unhappy with me and they posted a screenshot from Meta’s AI in an effort to attack me. This screenshot was filled with lies. I couldn’t believe it was real so I checked myself. It was even worse when I checked. From that day I’ve faced a steady stream of false accusations that are deeply damaging to my character and the safety of my family. This sounds bad, right? It gets MUCH worse. Meta was notified LAST YEAR by my lawyers, yet the defamation continues today. Some lies Meta spread about me: • Meta’s AI claims that I’ve appeared on Nick Fuentes show, that I’ve spoken at his rallies, and that I’ve supported him. I’ve never met him and this is all false. • Meta’s AI claims I’ve engaged in Holocaust denial. I’ve NEVER denied the Holocaust. • Meta’s AI tells advertisers NOT to advertise with me because of the lies it invented. • Meta tells employers NOT to hire me because of the lies it invented. • Meta suggested that MY KIDS BE TAKEN FROM ME because it would be better for them to be raised by someone more friendly to DEI and transgenderism. • Meta’s ironically claimed that I’ve been sued for DEFAMATION and EMOTIONAL DISTRESS. I’ve never been sued for either. I’ve tried to fix this privately since last year. Instead of fixing this and instituting safeguards, Meta has given us the runaround. Meta later BLACKLISTED my name from being searched (insane) but it didn’t end the defamation because Meta includes my name in news stories. You can then ask for more info about me. If you do that, Meta goes back to defaming me. In fact, the lies this week are the worst yet! Meta’s AI admits that a false accusation over J6 is extremely harmful to whoever is accused. It even agrees that a court is LIKELY to rule that this was defamation with ACTUAL MALICE. With my lawsuit today, I intend to MAKE Mark Zuckerberg Meta solve this problem. Why is this so important? While I’m the target today, a candidate you like could be the next target, and lies from Meta’s AI could flip votes that decide the election. YOU could be the next target too. That’s why I’m taking on this David vs. Goliath fight. For me, my honor, my family, for our elections, and FOR YOU! If you want to help me fight ALL the battles that I’m fighting, you can help support my team at Timecodes: (0:00) Intro (0:40) Announcing Meta Lawsuit (2:01) Video of Meta’s AI Defaming Me (03:24) Meta’s AI Tells People Not To Hire or Advertise With Me (04:30) How This All Started (05:35) Trying Meta’s AI Myself — Meta Claims I Was Charged With A Crime (06:06) Meta Says I Support Nick Fuentes (06:45) Meta Says I’m A Holocaust Denier (07:07) Meta’s AI Admits Courts Will Likely Find What They Did To Be Malicious (08:08) The Threat To Our Elections (09:11) More Defamation (09:27) Were Meta’s Lies Used In A Corporate Intelligence Report? (10:36) Meta’s AI Says They Need To Apologize And Institute Safeguards (11:15) Meta Admits Their Lies Have Damaged My Reputation (11:30) Our Legal Communication since 2024 (12:28) Meta Blacklists My Name + How It Lies (14:08) Meta Suggests Authorities Take My Kids Away Because I Pose A "Threat To Their Wellbeing" (16:00) Meta Asks Me For PR Help 😳 (16:31) The Consequences Of Lying AI (17:39) Threats and An Arrest Of A Man Who Wanted To Kill Me (18:30) Closing Argument (19:07) Introducing My New Show
19:58

Today I’m announcing a major multi-million dollar defamation lawsuit against Meta, the owner of Facebook & Instagram. The case is WILD and has implications for ALL OF US. On top of falsely calling me a criminal, Meta suggested my kids be taken from me. Here’s a summary of events: This all started with Meta’s AI falsely claiming that I was charged with a crime from January 6th but… I wasn’t even in DC that day (I was in TN) and I’ve never been charged with a crime IN MY LIFE. We found this out in August of 2024 when I was exposing woke policies at Harley Davidson. One dealership was unhappy with me and they posted a screenshot from Meta’s AI in an effort to attack me. This screenshot was filled with lies. I couldn’t believe it was real so I checked myself. It was even worse when I checked. From that day I’ve faced a steady stream of false accusations that are deeply damaging to my character and the safety of my family. This sounds bad, right? It gets MUCH worse. Meta was notified LAST YEAR by my lawyers, yet the defamation continues today. Some lies Meta spread about me: • Meta’s AI claims that I’ve appeared on Nick Fuentes show, that I’ve spoken at his rallies, and that I’ve supported him. I’ve never met him and this is all false. • Meta’s AI claims I’ve engaged in Holocaust denial. I’ve NEVER denied the Holocaust. • Meta’s AI tells advertisers NOT to advertise with me because of the lies it invented. • Meta tells employers NOT to hire me because of the lies it invented. • Meta suggested that MY KIDS BE TAKEN FROM ME because it would be better for them to be raised by someone more friendly to DEI and transgenderism. • Meta’s ironically claimed that I’ve been sued for DEFAMATION and EMOTIONAL DISTRESS. I’ve never been sued for either. I’ve tried to fix this privately since last year. Instead of fixing this and instituting safeguards, Meta has given us the runaround. Meta later BLACKLISTED my name from being searched (insane) but it didn’t end the defamation because Meta includes my name in news stories. You can then ask for more info about me. If you do that, Meta goes back to defaming me. In fact, the lies this week are the worst yet! Meta’s AI admits that a false accusation over J6 is extremely harmful to whoever is accused. It even agrees that a court is LIKELY to rule that this was defamation with ACTUAL MALICE. With my lawsuit today, I intend to MAKE Mark Zuckerberg Meta solve this problem. Why is this so important? While I’m the target today, a candidate you like could be the next target, and lies from Meta’s AI could flip votes that decide the election. YOU could be the next target too. That’s why I’m taking on this David vs. Goliath fight. For me, my honor, my family, for our elections, and FOR YOU! If you want to help me fight ALL the battles that I’m fighting, you can help support my team at Timecodes: (0:00) Intro (0:40) Announcing Meta Lawsuit (2:01) Video of Meta’s AI Defaming Me (03:24) Meta’s AI Tells People Not To Hire or Advertise With Me (04:30) How This All Started (05:35) Trying Meta’s AI Myself — Meta Claims I Was Charged With A Crime (06:06) Meta Says I Support Nick Fuentes (06:45) Meta Says I’m A Holocaust Denier (07:07) Meta’s AI Admits Courts Will Likely Find What They Did To Be Malicious (08:08) The Threat To Our Elections (09:11) More Defamation (09:27) Were Meta’s Lies Used In A Corporate Intelligence Report? (10:36) Meta’s AI Says They Need To Apologize And Institute Safeguards (11:15) Meta Admits Their Lies Have Damaged My Reputation (11:30) Our Legal Communication since 2024 (12:28) Meta Blacklists My Name + How It Lies (14:08) Meta Suggests Authorities Take My Kids Away Because I Pose A "Threat To Their Wellbeing" (16:00) Meta Asks Me For PR Help 😳 (16:31) The Consequences Of Lying AI (17:39) Threats and An Arrest Of A Man Who Wanted To Kill Me (18:30) Closing Argument (19:07) Introducing My New Show

Robby Starbuck

3,720,145 views • 1 year ago