Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Senator Scott Weiner has authored terrible bills that Gavin Newsom has signed into law. SB145 Allows convicted pedophiles to not register as sex offenders if victim was over age 14 and there was a 10 year or less age difference. SB132 Allows men to transfer into women’s prisons if...

InformedMama209's profile picture

Denise Aguilar

62,946 subscribers

28,414 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & PolitikaEğitim
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨Illinois Governor JB Pritzker just signed House Bill 106 — decriminalizing the intentional spread of HIV.🚨 The new law repeals a 1986 statute that made it a felony for someone who knows they have HIV to engage in unprotected sex, share needles, or donate blood without informing the other person. While Democrats obsess over Trump’s memes and “disinformation,” they’re busy passing laws that make it legal to spread literal death. This is the Democrat Party in 2026.
0:25

🚨Illinois Governor JB Pritzker just signed House Bill 106 — decriminalizing the intentional spread of HIV.🚨 The new law repeals a 1986 statute that made it a felony for someone who knows they have HIV to engage in unprotected sex, share needles, or donate blood without informing the other person. While Democrats obsess over Trump’s memes and “disinformation,” they’re busy passing laws that make it legal to spread literal death. This is the Democrat Party in 2026.

Reverend Jordan Wells

18,599 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

THIS IS INSANE! ⚠️🚨Yesterday, California’s Senate Democrats Rejected Bill to Make Purchasing 16, 17-year-olds for Sex a Felony. Democrats rejected Bill authored by Sen. Shannon Grove to make the buying of children for sex a prison felony, and hijacked her bill forcing hostile amendments by denying Grove’s efforts to protect 16 and 17-year-old children from being purchased as part of commercial sex trafficking. Under the amended bill now solicitation of 16 and 17 year-olds will remain a misdemeanor, punishable by as little as 2 days in jail or up to a $10,000 fine. Grove’s bill would make solicitation, attempting to engage or engaging in sex with a minor for money a felony with a prison sentence ranging from 2 to 4 years, a fine not exceeding $25,000, and registration as a sex offender. The bill would punish all those who solicit from a child, regardless of whether or not the person knew or reasonably should have known that the person solicited was a minor.
0:30

THIS IS INSANE! ⚠️🚨Yesterday, California’s Senate Democrats Rejected Bill to Make Purchasing 16, 17-year-olds for Sex a Felony. Democrats rejected Bill authored by Sen. Shannon Grove to make the buying of children for sex a prison felony, and hijacked her bill forcing hostile amendments by denying Grove’s efforts to protect 16 and 17-year-old children from being purchased as part of commercial sex trafficking. Under the amended bill now solicitation of 16 and 17 year-olds will remain a misdemeanor, punishable by as little as 2 days in jail or up to a $10,000 fine. Grove’s bill would make solicitation, attempting to engage or engaging in sex with a minor for money a felony with a prison sentence ranging from 2 to 4 years, a fine not exceeding $25,000, and registration as a sex offender. The bill would punish all those who solicit from a child, regardless of whether or not the person knew or reasonably should have known that the person solicited was a minor.

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

3,077,347 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

A registered sex offender is running for City Council in California as a Democrat California Rep David Tangipa “There is a registered sex offender that has filed to run for Fresno City Council — I understand exactly why this person feels so emboldened to run It is because Governor Newsom and the supermajority in Sacramento have a criminal first agenda. They have passed laws that give criminals the right to come into our communities and the confidence to run for city council. Think about it. There is a law that was signed by Governor Newsom that allowed people who were in prison life in prison to apply for elderly parole once they meet. The age of50 in the state of California is considered elderly if you're in prison. But did you also know that juvenile in the state of California is anybody under the age of 25? So apparently there is a 25 year window where we're normal adults. There are 25 year olds right now in juvenile detention facilities that are with 12 year olds. That is what California looks like. That is what happens when you elect the supermajority in Sacramento that has a criminal first agenda”
1:23

A registered sex offender is running for City Council in California as a Democrat California Rep David Tangipa “There is a registered sex offender that has filed to run for Fresno City Council — I understand exactly why this person feels so emboldened to run It is because Governor Newsom and the supermajority in Sacramento have a criminal first agenda. They have passed laws that give criminals the right to come into our communities and the confidence to run for city council. Think about it. There is a law that was signed by Governor Newsom that allowed people who were in prison life in prison to apply for elderly parole once they meet. The age of50 in the state of California is considered elderly if you're in prison. But did you also know that juvenile in the state of California is anybody under the age of 25? So apparently there is a 25 year window where we're normal adults. There are 25 year olds right now in juvenile detention facilities that are with 12 year olds. That is what California looks like. That is what happens when you elect the supermajority in Sacramento that has a criminal first agenda”

Wall Street Apes

20,435 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🚨SCOOP: CA and Scott Wiener Decriminalize Spreading HIV — But Rush to Criminalize Journalists like Nick Shirley Exposing their Scams. Scott Wiener led the charge in California to soften HIV criminalization laws, turning serious felonies into misdemeanors. JB Pritzker followed right behind him in Illinois, fully repealing their HIV-specific statute in 2021. This means NO misdemeanor or felony charges! Now Wiener’s out here pushing the so-called “Stop Nick Shirley Act” — a blatant move to slap journalists with fines, jail time, and content takedowns for daring to expose fraud and corruption. He lacked confidence when confronted by Shirley because he knew he was in the wrong. Meanwhile, even though Gavin Newsom wasn’t governor when Wiener’s HIV bill passed, he was Lieutenant Governor, and he’s cozying up to the same network — just bought a $9 million mansion from Daniel Pritzker, billionaire cousin of JB Pritzker himself. They are protecting people who spread HIV without disclosure, punishing the watchdogs who call out the grift, and swapping luxury homes between connected political families. It’s one big, untouchable club looking out for each other while the rest of us deal with the consequences. What are they really trying to hide? You tell me.
2:33

🚨SCOOP: CA and Scott Wiener Decriminalize Spreading HIV — But Rush to Criminalize Journalists like Nick Shirley Exposing their Scams. Scott Wiener led the charge in California to soften HIV criminalization laws, turning serious felonies into misdemeanors. JB Pritzker followed right behind him in Illinois, fully repealing their HIV-specific statute in 2021. This means NO misdemeanor or felony charges! Now Wiener’s out here pushing the so-called “Stop Nick Shirley Act” — a blatant move to slap journalists with fines, jail time, and content takedowns for daring to expose fraud and corruption. He lacked confidence when confronted by Shirley because he knew he was in the wrong. Meanwhile, even though Gavin Newsom wasn’t governor when Wiener’s HIV bill passed, he was Lieutenant Governor, and he’s cozying up to the same network — just bought a $9 million mansion from Daniel Pritzker, billionaire cousin of JB Pritzker himself. They are protecting people who spread HIV without disclosure, punishing the watchdogs who call out the grift, and swapping luxury homes between connected political families. It’s one big, untouchable club looking out for each other while the rest of us deal with the consequences. What are they really trying to hide? You tell me.

Max Bonilla

18,009 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

For over two decades, the US Government has been the biggest champion of the global HIV response. The current disruptions in US funding for PEPFAR and other programs are having a devastating impact. If PEPFAR is not fully resumed, and other resources are not found for the HIV response, UNAIDS estimates that over the next four years there would be: ☑️ 6.3 million additional AIDS-related deaths ☑️ 8.7 million additional people newly infected with HIV. The global disruption in HIV prevention and treatment services has led to clinic closures and halted prevention efforts and community systems - threatening to reverse decades of hard-won progress in the fight to #endAIDS. The suddenness of this disruption highlights the need for a planned transition for countries from foreign aid to national ownership in order to ensure continuity of HIV services. UNAIDS Global is working with partners to develop HIV sustainability roadmaps to support countries to lead the critical programmatic, policy and financial aspects of their HIV response. We are promoting national ownership, increasing domestic financing, and ensuring that the hard-earned progress in the HIV response is protected and sustained. A vital lesson in all this is that global problems need global solutions. Pandemics respect no borders, and viruses don’t stop for visas. Ending a pandemic like AIDS requires coordination, solidarity, and compassion. We are hopeful that the 🇺🇸 government will maintain its life-saving contributions through PEPFAR, while countries work urgently to ensure sustainability of their HIV responses with greater national ownership.
1:20

For over two decades, the US Government has been the biggest champion of the global HIV response. The current disruptions in US funding for PEPFAR and other programs are having a devastating impact. If PEPFAR is not fully resumed, and other resources are not found for the HIV response, UNAIDS estimates that over the next four years there would be: ☑️ 6.3 million additional AIDS-related deaths ☑️ 8.7 million additional people newly infected with HIV. The global disruption in HIV prevention and treatment services has led to clinic closures and halted prevention efforts and community systems - threatening to reverse decades of hard-won progress in the fight to #endAIDS. The suddenness of this disruption highlights the need for a planned transition for countries from foreign aid to national ownership in order to ensure continuity of HIV services. UNAIDS Global is working with partners to develop HIV sustainability roadmaps to support countries to lead the critical programmatic, policy and financial aspects of their HIV response. We are promoting national ownership, increasing domestic financing, and ensuring that the hard-earned progress in the HIV response is protected and sustained. A vital lesson in all this is that global problems need global solutions. Pandemics respect no borders, and viruses don’t stop for visas. Ending a pandemic like AIDS requires coordination, solidarity, and compassion. We are hopeful that the 🇺🇸 government will maintain its life-saving contributions through PEPFAR, while countries work urgently to ensure sustainability of their HIV responses with greater national ownership.

Winnie Byanyima

20,966 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Michigan Democrats are terrified Biden will implode and drag them down. So today they bet the bank and went all out to codify election fraud into state statute with SB 603. Today they smashed through this gigantic pile of election-fraud-enabling legislation today with Democrat only votes. SB603 Repeals current law that gives authority to bipartisan county Boards of Canvassers to investigate fraud and other wrongdoing including ballot tampering during recounts. With the passage of their (election-fraud-enabling) Bill, there will be no future route for requesting a recount if you believe there was fraud. Under their corruption bill, candidates will be prohibited from requesting a recount if they suspect fraud and is designed to stop investigations of election fraud by the Board of Canvassers. This disgusting bill will now permit clerks to recount ballots even if seals are broken on ballot containers and was essentially written by the Secretary of State who was reversed multiple times, by our Supreme Court for her illegal election decisions. The bill changes the standard for a candidate or party to petition for a recount of election results from alleging there has been “mistake or fraud” in the process to now only permitting alleging there has been an “error.” So even if the candidate or Party is absolutely convinced there was fraud, this cannot be alleged or investigated. To boot, this Democrat’s bill makes it tougher to do a recount by doubling the recount petition fees and making it a felony for 'interfering' with a recount without any clear definition of what that means to open up more “LAWFARE.” If passed as is, the language is changed to prohibit a recount, investigation or audit of the conduct of an election when fraud is alleged to only a determination of the number of votes cast for one candidate or another, or a ballot question. Lastly, the bill says a recount could not assess the qualification of the voters participating in an election, or the manner in which ballots are applied for, or issued to voters. Wow isn’t that a doozy. If illegals, or dead people, or those not registered in Mich. are voting, we cannot “assess the qualification of those voters or the manner in which those ballots were applied for and issued to these voters.” Yep, the Democrats have completely thrown off the mask with this terrible bill attempting to win at any cost-our Republic... be damned.
2:01

Michigan Democrats are terrified Biden will implode and drag them down. So today they bet the bank and went all out to codify election fraud into state statute with SB 603. Today they smashed through this gigantic pile of election-fraud-enabling legislation today with Democrat only votes. SB603 Repeals current law that gives authority to bipartisan county Boards of Canvassers to investigate fraud and other wrongdoing including ballot tampering during recounts. With the passage of their (election-fraud-enabling) Bill, there will be no future route for requesting a recount if you believe there was fraud. Under their corruption bill, candidates will be prohibited from requesting a recount if they suspect fraud and is designed to stop investigations of election fraud by the Board of Canvassers. This disgusting bill will now permit clerks to recount ballots even if seals are broken on ballot containers and was essentially written by the Secretary of State who was reversed multiple times, by our Supreme Court for her illegal election decisions. The bill changes the standard for a candidate or party to petition for a recount of election results from alleging there has been “mistake or fraud” in the process to now only permitting alleging there has been an “error.” So even if the candidate or Party is absolutely convinced there was fraud, this cannot be alleged or investigated. To boot, this Democrat’s bill makes it tougher to do a recount by doubling the recount petition fees and making it a felony for 'interfering' with a recount without any clear definition of what that means to open up more “LAWFARE.” If passed as is, the language is changed to prohibit a recount, investigation or audit of the conduct of an election when fraud is alleged to only a determination of the number of votes cast for one candidate or another, or a ballot question. Lastly, the bill says a recount could not assess the qualification of the voters participating in an election, or the manner in which ballots are applied for, or issued to voters. Wow isn’t that a doozy. If illegals, or dead people, or those not registered in Mich. are voting, we cannot “assess the qualification of those voters or the manner in which those ballots were applied for and issued to these voters.” Yep, the Democrats have completely thrown off the mask with this terrible bill attempting to win at any cost-our Republic... be damned.

Jim Runestad

126,341 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

NEW: Hawaii Bill HB2079 Legalizes Kidnapping Children Across State Lines Directly From Hawaii Free Press “HB2079 Would Legalize Child Kidnapping for Sex Change” The Bill “Also forbids the entire state of Hawaii, including the governor, from disclosing records or extraditing any kidnapper charged in another state so long as the kidnapper alleges that the purpose of taking the child was to provide access to gender affirming care” Bill HB2079 “Forbids the courts from returning any child kidnapped from their home state. What in It gives them legal jurisdiction over your child.” “It also makes it a crime to interfere with the kidnappers or to disclose any data about the gender affirming care with anyone other than the kidnap kidnap kidnapper petitioner even if it's ordered by another court. And it would also become a crime under state law to comply with any oversight or investigation into the kidnappings from” More details on the Bill from Hawaii Free Press: “The Hawaii Kidnapping Bill's unique and unmistakable true intent is to allow legal protections for any non-parent with sufficient access and means to remove a child of any age from their home state, and to bring them to Hawaii in the name of receiving “Gender Affirming Care” – so long as they could not receive said ‘care’ in their home state. The many sections of Hawaii Revised Statutes affected by the Hawaii Kidnapping Bill are designed to trigger a series of child-custody 'loopholes' that cause inter-state barriers to be systematically removed, so long as the instigator says the magic words: “Gender Affirming Care.” “The bill's proposed amendments to the UCCJEA redefine a family-court emergency, to allow any person “acting as a parent” to obtain emergency temporary custody against natural parents who decline to provide their children so-called “Gender Affirming Care.” Natural parents’ refusal to provide sex-change procedures would be treated as being of the same legal weight and severity as actual physical abuse or child abandonment. The bill reads: §583A-204, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: (a) A court of this State [has] shall have temporary emergency jurisdiction if the child is present in this State and the child has been abandoned or it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because [the]: (1) The child, or a sibling or parent of the child, is subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse[.]; or (2) The child has been unable to obtain gender‑affirming health care services. This language plainly redefines a custody “emergency” to mean “unable to obtain gender‑affirming health care services.”
0:59

NEW: Hawaii Bill HB2079 Legalizes Kidnapping Children Across State Lines Directly From Hawaii Free Press “HB2079 Would Legalize Child Kidnapping for Sex Change” The Bill “Also forbids the entire state of Hawaii, including the governor, from disclosing records or extraditing any kidnapper charged in another state so long as the kidnapper alleges that the purpose of taking the child was to provide access to gender affirming care” Bill HB2079 “Forbids the courts from returning any child kidnapped from their home state. What in It gives them legal jurisdiction over your child.” “It also makes it a crime to interfere with the kidnappers or to disclose any data about the gender affirming care with anyone other than the kidnap kidnap kidnapper petitioner even if it's ordered by another court. And it would also become a crime under state law to comply with any oversight or investigation into the kidnappings from” More details on the Bill from Hawaii Free Press: “The Hawaii Kidnapping Bill's unique and unmistakable true intent is to allow legal protections for any non-parent with sufficient access and means to remove a child of any age from their home state, and to bring them to Hawaii in the name of receiving “Gender Affirming Care” – so long as they could not receive said ‘care’ in their home state. The many sections of Hawaii Revised Statutes affected by the Hawaii Kidnapping Bill are designed to trigger a series of child-custody 'loopholes' that cause inter-state barriers to be systematically removed, so long as the instigator says the magic words: “Gender Affirming Care.” “The bill's proposed amendments to the UCCJEA redefine a family-court emergency, to allow any person “acting as a parent” to obtain emergency temporary custody against natural parents who decline to provide their children so-called “Gender Affirming Care.” Natural parents’ refusal to provide sex-change procedures would be treated as being of the same legal weight and severity as actual physical abuse or child abandonment. The bill reads: §583A-204, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: (a) A court of this State [has] shall have temporary emergency jurisdiction if the child is present in this State and the child has been abandoned or it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because [the]: (1) The child, or a sibling or parent of the child, is subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse[.]; or (2) The child has been unable to obtain gender‑affirming health care services. This language plainly redefines a custody “emergency” to mean “unable to obtain gender‑affirming health care services.”

Wall Street Apes

269,970 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

JUST IN: California lawmakers approve AB 1840 which allows for illegal immigrants to receive up to $150,000 for down payments on homes. The program is called the "California Dream for All" loan program, which will provide up to 20% down payment assistance up to $150,000. The program was initially only for legal residents however the new version would allow for illegal immigrants to apply for the program. California Governor Gavin Newsom has not yet committed to signing the bill into law. "If the bill reaches his desk, the Governor will evaluate it on its merits," said Newsom spokesperson. The bill was passed in the State Senate with a vote of 23 in favor and 11 not in favor. Here is Newsom being "outraged" over what Republicans did to combat Biden's "border" bill. Meanwhile, his party wants to hand illegal immigrants cash for homes.
0:43

JUST IN: California lawmakers approve AB 1840 which allows for illegal immigrants to receive up to $150,000 for down payments on homes. The program is called the "California Dream for All" loan program, which will provide up to 20% down payment assistance up to $150,000. The program was initially only for legal residents however the new version would allow for illegal immigrants to apply for the program. California Governor Gavin Newsom has not yet committed to signing the bill into law. "If the bill reaches his desk, the Governor will evaluate it on its merits," said Newsom spokesperson. The bill was passed in the State Senate with a vote of 23 in favor and 11 not in favor. Here is Newsom being "outraged" over what Republicans did to combat Biden's "border" bill. Meanwhile, his party wants to hand illegal immigrants cash for homes.

Collin Rugg

1,923,591 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

For those seeking context, I am sharing a video of Senator Kaine’s full statement. If anything, he sounds worse than the shorter clip portrays. This statement was made during a confirmation hearing yesterday. In his opening statement, Riley Barnes, nominee for Assistant Secretary of State, shared this quote: “We are a nation founded on a powerful principle, and that powerful principle is that all men are created equal, because our rights come from God our Creator – not from our laws, not from our governments.” Senator Kaine was explicitly disagreeing with the sentiments regarding rights that Barnes expressed in his testimony. Kaine concluded with: “To demean laws, and to demean governments, and to suggest that rights don’t come from laws and governments—again, I think there are such things as natural rights and I try to live in accordance with them. I would never try to demean the law. We are a nation of laws, not men. Laws, not people. If we now—suddenly, after 250 years—start to demean that or diminish that and suggest, ‘no, it’s natural rights,’ as defined by a leader—the leader of Iran or the leader of any nation—that does not create a place of safety or comfort for folks.” I don’t think he has a clue what he’s trying to say.
4:16

For those seeking context, I am sharing a video of Senator Kaine’s full statement. If anything, he sounds worse than the shorter clip portrays. This statement was made during a confirmation hearing yesterday. In his opening statement, Riley Barnes, nominee for Assistant Secretary of State, shared this quote: “We are a nation founded on a powerful principle, and that powerful principle is that all men are created equal, because our rights come from God our Creator – not from our laws, not from our governments.” Senator Kaine was explicitly disagreeing with the sentiments regarding rights that Barnes expressed in his testimony. Kaine concluded with: “To demean laws, and to demean governments, and to suggest that rights don’t come from laws and governments—again, I think there are such things as natural rights and I try to live in accordance with them. I would never try to demean the law. We are a nation of laws, not men. Laws, not people. If we now—suddenly, after 250 years—start to demean that or diminish that and suggest, ‘no, it’s natural rights,’ as defined by a leader—the leader of Iran or the leader of any nation—that does not create a place of safety or comfort for folks.” I don’t think he has a clue what he’s trying to say.

Laura Powell

24,257 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

CBS asked the candidates for Governor of California to name one misstep that Gavin Newsom has made as Governor. Name just one thing that Newsom has not done well as Governor. Eric Swalwell was the only candidate who couldn't or wouldn't name a single thing that Gavin Newsom has gotten wrong as Governor. Empty Eric Swalwell is one of the most ret*rded people to ever be in American politics. If CA elects this absolute fool as Governor, shame on them. While running for Governor in 2018, Newsom campaigned on fixing two main issues, homelessness and affordability. Both problems have gotten substantially worse during his tenure as Governor. Not to mention the dozens of disaster projects that have gone no where. Or the fires he wasn't prepared for. Or the rampant fraud.
1:34

CBS asked the candidates for Governor of California to name one misstep that Gavin Newsom has made as Governor. Name just one thing that Newsom has not done well as Governor. Eric Swalwell was the only candidate who couldn't or wouldn't name a single thing that Gavin Newsom has gotten wrong as Governor. Empty Eric Swalwell is one of the most ret*rded people to ever be in American politics. If CA elects this absolute fool as Governor, shame on them. While running for Governor in 2018, Newsom campaigned on fixing two main issues, homelessness and affordability. Both problems have gotten substantially worse during his tenure as Governor. Not to mention the dozens of disaster projects that have gone no where. Or the fires he wasn't prepared for. Or the rampant fraud.

MAZE

407,974 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

BREAKING.🚨 Judge Merchan has instructed the jury they do not need to have a *UNANIMOUS* verdict in order to convict former President Donald J. Trump. "One thing in particular that the judge said the jurors could do. He delivered what is being called really the pinnacle of all of this. There is no need to agree on what has occurred. They can disagree on what the crime was among the three choices." "This means they could split 4-4-4 and the judge would still treat them unanimously. What does that mean?" "Outrageous. In a normal criminal case every statutory crime has what we call elements of the offense. Like in a bank robbery case you have to rob – it has to be a financial institution, you have to show intent," said former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy. "Those are the things the jury has to agree on unanimously that they were proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Here what we’re doing is taking the element that actually makes this a felony, because remember falsification of records is normally a misdemeanor in New York. What makes it a felony is that you are concealing or committing another crime." "And here the judge is telling them they don’t have to agree about what the other crime is under circumstances where that not only is what makes this a felony, makes it a four-year potential prison penalty rather than a year or less, but it is also what gets us into the courtroom." "If this had been a misdemeanor, the time to bring this case would have lapsed in 2019. The only reason they are still able to bring this case is because it’s a felony allegedly and yet now the judge is saying you know, you don’t have to agree on what the felony is." The jury has now gone to deliberations.
1:45

BREAKING.🚨 Judge Merchan has instructed the jury they do not need to have a *UNANIMOUS* verdict in order to convict former President Donald J. Trump. "One thing in particular that the judge said the jurors could do. He delivered what is being called really the pinnacle of all of this. There is no need to agree on what has occurred. They can disagree on what the crime was among the three choices." "This means they could split 4-4-4 and the judge would still treat them unanimously. What does that mean?" "Outrageous. In a normal criminal case every statutory crime has what we call elements of the offense. Like in a bank robbery case you have to rob – it has to be a financial institution, you have to show intent," said former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy. "Those are the things the jury has to agree on unanimously that they were proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Here what we’re doing is taking the element that actually makes this a felony, because remember falsification of records is normally a misdemeanor in New York. What makes it a felony is that you are concealing or committing another crime." "And here the judge is telling them they don’t have to agree about what the other crime is under circumstances where that not only is what makes this a felony, makes it a four-year potential prison penalty rather than a year or less, but it is also what gets us into the courtroom." "If this had been a misdemeanor, the time to bring this case would have lapsed in 2019. The only reason they are still able to bring this case is because it’s a felony allegedly and yet now the judge is saying you know, you don’t have to agree on what the felony is." The jury has now gone to deliberations.

Kyle Becker

5,835,202 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

California State Senator Scott Wiener held a pumpkin carving event for children with drag queens This is Wiener’s record: SB 357: Bill to decriminalize loitering, protecting pimps, and enabling sex traffickers AB 1028: Bill ending mandated reporting of abuse of women unless the abuse is with a gun SB 145: Bill allowing sex offenders to avoid registry if sex is with a minor within a 10-year age gap ASB 961: taxpayer-funded "harm reduction" drug dens, enabling addiction and related crime SB 57: Safe injection sites for people to engage in their addictions, enabling degrading lifestyles SB 132: Bill allowing biological males in women's prisons, resulting in rape SB 1414: Voted not to protect 16 & 17-year-olds from being bought for sex AB 367: Did not support sentencing enhancements for killing/harming by fentanyl AB 955: Did not support increasing penalties for fentanyl sales over social media SB 54: Voted to prohibit law enforcement from reporting known drug dealers to ICE SB 94: Bill to parole convicted murderers sentenced to life without parole This walking red flag is running for Nancy Pelosi’s seat in Congress. KEEP HIM AWAY FROM CONGRESS AND FROM YOUR KIDS
0:30

California State Senator Scott Wiener held a pumpkin carving event for children with drag queens This is Wiener’s record: SB 357: Bill to decriminalize loitering, protecting pimps, and enabling sex traffickers AB 1028: Bill ending mandated reporting of abuse of women unless the abuse is with a gun SB 145: Bill allowing sex offenders to avoid registry if sex is with a minor within a 10-year age gap ASB 961: taxpayer-funded "harm reduction" drug dens, enabling addiction and related crime SB 57: Safe injection sites for people to engage in their addictions, enabling degrading lifestyles SB 132: Bill allowing biological males in women's prisons, resulting in rape SB 1414: Voted not to protect 16 & 17-year-olds from being bought for sex AB 367: Did not support sentencing enhancements for killing/harming by fentanyl AB 955: Did not support increasing penalties for fentanyl sales over social media SB 54: Voted to prohibit law enforcement from reporting known drug dealers to ICE SB 94: Bill to parole convicted murderers sentenced to life without parole This walking red flag is running for Nancy Pelosi’s seat in Congress. KEEP HIM AWAY FROM CONGRESS AND FROM YOUR KIDS

Libs of TikTok

610,759 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨 WOW! Stephen Miller floats SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY charges against Illinois Gov. Pritzker and other Democrats if they order the arrest of federal agents... "It doesn't only apply to Gov. Pritzker. It applies to ANY state official, local official, anybody who's operating in an official capacity who conspires or engages in activity that unlawfully impedes federal law enforcement conducting their duties." "There's obstruction of justice. There is harboring illegal aliens. There is impeding the enforcement of our immigration laws. Then as you get up the scale of behavior, you obviously get into seditious conspiracy charges, depending on the conduct, and many other offenses!" "If you engage in a criminal conspiracy to obstruct the enforcement of federal immigration laws or to unlawfully order your own police officers or your own officials to try to interfere with ICE officers, or even to arrest ICE officers, you're engaged in criminal activity!" "To all ICE officers, you have federal IMMUNITY in the conduct of your duties! And anybody who lays a hand on you or tries to stop you or tries to obstruct you is committing a FELONY." "If officials cross that line into obstruction, into criminal conspiracy against the United States or against ICE officers, then they will face JUSTICE." BOOM!
2:07

🚨 WOW! Stephen Miller floats SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY charges against Illinois Gov. Pritzker and other Democrats if they order the arrest of federal agents... "It doesn't only apply to Gov. Pritzker. It applies to ANY state official, local official, anybody who's operating in an official capacity who conspires or engages in activity that unlawfully impedes federal law enforcement conducting their duties." "There's obstruction of justice. There is harboring illegal aliens. There is impeding the enforcement of our immigration laws. Then as you get up the scale of behavior, you obviously get into seditious conspiracy charges, depending on the conduct, and many other offenses!" "If you engage in a criminal conspiracy to obstruct the enforcement of federal immigration laws or to unlawfully order your own police officers or your own officials to try to interfere with ICE officers, or even to arrest ICE officers, you're engaged in criminal activity!" "To all ICE officers, you have federal IMMUNITY in the conduct of your duties! And anybody who lays a hand on you or tries to stop you or tries to obstruct you is committing a FELONY." "If officials cross that line into obstruction, into criminal conspiracy against the United States or against ICE officers, then they will face JUSTICE." BOOM!

Eric Daugherty

76,161 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Newsom: I have Rudy Giuliani’s point of view, who made the case as an advocate for sanctuary policy when he was mayor of New York, when he said it keeps people safer, healthier, and more educated—safer in the context that it allows community members to be more likely to participate as witnesses to crime or as victims of crime in going after the perpetrators; more likely to get an immunization shot if they’re not worried about the nurse turning them over to ICE; more likely to go to school and get educated if they’re not worried about the school crossing guard crossing them and ultimately turning them over to ICE. So it’s a tool of pragmatism because of the complete, abject failure of the federal government. Sanctuary policies are unnecessary if we had comprehensive immigration reform and a federal response that was adequate to the task. But in the absence of that, it’s grown from the ’70s and ’80s and ’90s into the 2000s. Shapiro: Sanctuary policy obviously has had a massive impact as a driver of a tremendous number of illegal immigrants in the state of California. Newsom: I don’t know about that. You see in a lot of states that don’t have sanctuary policies a huge increase in illegal immigration—massive increases far greater than the state of California.
1:41

Newsom: I have Rudy Giuliani’s point of view, who made the case as an advocate for sanctuary policy when he was mayor of New York, when he said it keeps people safer, healthier, and more educated—safer in the context that it allows community members to be more likely to participate as witnesses to crime or as victims of crime in going after the perpetrators; more likely to get an immunization shot if they’re not worried about the nurse turning them over to ICE; more likely to go to school and get educated if they’re not worried about the school crossing guard crossing them and ultimately turning them over to ICE. So it’s a tool of pragmatism because of the complete, abject failure of the federal government. Sanctuary policies are unnecessary if we had comprehensive immigration reform and a federal response that was adequate to the task. But in the absence of that, it’s grown from the ’70s and ’80s and ’90s into the 2000s. Shapiro: Sanctuary policy obviously has had a massive impact as a driver of a tremendous number of illegal immigrants in the state of California. Newsom: I don’t know about that. You see in a lot of states that don’t have sanctuary policies a huge increase in illegal immigration—massive increases far greater than the state of California.

Acyn

250,151 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Senator Tim Sheehy slams CNN over Democrats immigration agenda “There's a desire to keep these people here — This was an intentional importation of millions of people to sanctuary cities, and now they want to make it impossible for us to deport them. Despite the fact that that's what the American people have not only voted for the polls to this day, even in the wake of the Minneapolis mistakes, to this day, the American people still support securing the border and deporting illegal immigrants.” “The policies from the federal government down to local government incentivized mass migration. And I don't know how you say that any other way than that was intentional. It was intentional acts from the federal government to state governments to city governments to encourage this mass migration. If it wasn't intentional, how come the Trump administration was able to close that border with with a snap of a finger in a matter of days, which is exactly what they did. It was a choice not to secure that border.”
1:30

Senator Tim Sheehy slams CNN over Democrats immigration agenda “There's a desire to keep these people here — This was an intentional importation of millions of people to sanctuary cities, and now they want to make it impossible for us to deport them. Despite the fact that that's what the American people have not only voted for the polls to this day, even in the wake of the Minneapolis mistakes, to this day, the American people still support securing the border and deporting illegal immigrants.” “The policies from the federal government down to local government incentivized mass migration. And I don't know how you say that any other way than that was intentional. It was intentional acts from the federal government to state governments to city governments to encourage this mass migration. If it wasn't intentional, how come the Trump administration was able to close that border with with a snap of a finger in a matter of days, which is exactly what they did. It was a choice not to secure that border.”

Wall Street Apes

49,762 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce