正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

. Sephora and Ulta Beauty cannot keep pretending this is “just business” while platforming Huda Beauty Huda Kattan has used her massive reach to amplify propaganda and conspiracy theories that line up with a cartel regime accused of massacring tens of thousands and funding terror, and that alone should...

199,670 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Obedience is a sacred pledge. An offering of self. Not an abandoning of self. Nor a selfish act. A submissive who obeys without discernment is not powerful. They are pliable. A submissive who obeys with reverence, discernment and clarity iis conscious of the value he brings and chooses who to offer this value to. And you make that choice, because you trust in the leadership and influence and benevolence of the person you choose to obey. The more obedient and devoted a submissive is, the more they allow their Mistress to fully embody her Dominance, the more they amplify her Divine Feminine Power. Because by obeying her, you showcase that her words and commands matter, that you trust them. Which in turn makes her feel safe and encouraged to assert herself and command with confidence. But there is a difference between seeking to find a Mıstress from a place of need and desperation.. And from a desire. Which is rooted in the energy of giving, not taking. Here are two questions to ask yourself as a sub, seeking this type of dynamic: Are your fantasies more about what she can do TO you (for you) or about what you can do for her? Are you fantasizing about being used, or about being of use? Real obedience is an act of devotional selflessness. It is obsequious. Performative obedience is where you become a slv to your own desires... a sycophant who selects someone to play out what you want, for your own personal benefit alone. [Exerpt from Sacred submission]
1:55

Sensitive content

Obedience is a sacred pledge. An offering of self. Not an abandoning of self. Nor a selfish act. A submissive who obeys without discernment is not powerful. They are pliable. A submissive who obeys with reverence, discernment and clarity iis conscious of the value he brings and chooses who to offer this value to. And you make that choice, because you trust in the leadership and influence and benevolence of the person you choose to obey. The more obedient and devoted a submissive is, the more they allow their Mistress to fully embody her Dominance, the more they amplify her Divine Feminine Power. Because by obeying her, you showcase that her words and commands matter, that you trust them. Which in turn makes her feel safe and encouraged to assert herself and command with confidence. But there is a difference between seeking to find a Mıstress from a place of need and desperation.. And from a desire. Which is rooted in the energy of giving, not taking. Here are two questions to ask yourself as a sub, seeking this type of dynamic: Are your fantasies more about what she can do TO you (for you) or about what you can do for her? Are you fantasizing about being used, or about being of use? Real obedience is an act of devotional selflessness. It is obsequious. Performative obedience is where you become a slv to your own desires... a sycophant who selects someone to play out what you want, for your own personal benefit alone. [Exerpt from Sacred submission]

Ms. Malissia

39,563 次观看 • 6 个月前

“Most people don’t care if someone says licensed instead of certified.” AKA: You don’t care that Leah blatantly lied about her credentials and misled thousands of people. And that is exactly where you’re wrong. People absolutely care because those words are not interchangeable. They may ignore it because of the sunk cost fallacy, but people who have not tied their entire identity to apophenia and these conspiracy theories will understand why it matters. That is why Leah blocks people with a following when they call her out for lying. “Licensed” communicates a higher level of professional oversight, scrutiny, and accountability than “certified.” That is why people use the term. It carries more authority. A genuine question for the defenders of theleahfiles: You told us Erika’s alleged lies about her college accolades were enough to destroy her credibility. You even used those allegations to insinuate that she could be involved in covering up Charlie’s assassination. Meanwhile, Leah has been doing phony “deep dives” into financial structures and business dealings. As a licensed professional who reviews financials and has experience with multiple business structures, I can see that she is either ignorant of how these arrangements work or deliberately misleading people into believing there are nefarious financial dealings without sufficient evidence. Yet with Leah: • She publicly claimed she was licensed, doubled down when I asked where she was licensed, and later changed it to certified. • She publicly claimed she had been doxed, but later acknowledged that the image and information people found came from a public X post made by a former employer. Meanwhile, the person she accused, Lisa Knows, ended up having non-public personal information circulated online. Yet now Brave Report you are saying none of this matters. So which standard are you using while claiming to be “seekers of truth”? If alleged dishonesty was enough for you to conclude that Erika might be involved in a cover-up, why doesn’t the same reasoning cause you to question Leah’s credibility and integrity? Or was it never really about honesty? Is it simply about who you want people to believe? And if Leah’s followers paid for her content because they believed she was a licensed fraud examiner, and that was a major reason they trusted her “investigations”, I think they should ask for a refund.

Nish Perez 🇺🇸🇵🇷

16,195 次观看 • 23 天前