Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Shapiro's AmFest Speech: A Timeless Masterpiece for Future Conservatives! "Shapiro's speeches at Heritage and at TPUSA will be read in 50 years by young conservatives if they want to understand what was at stake in this moment." ~Eli Lake Eli Lake, columnist at The Free Press and contributing editor...

Andreafreedom76's profile picture

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

31,018 subscribers

14,376 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨Ben Shapiro details why he called out Megyn Kelly at TPUSA "That was about Candace Owens' attacks on Erika Kirk." "I think it is evil what Candace Owens has done to Charlie Kirk's family." "Charlie was very good at relationship building. And what that meant was he was often texting two totally conflicting things to two different people at the same time." "If you see some of the texts Candace has released about what they were saying about Daily Wire. I mean, Charlie texted with us too and I don't release private text. But I can say that he was not saying the same thing..." "The critique that I had of Megyn was that she was allowing the personal relationships with some people to trump the truth and basic deceny." Patrick Bet-David Ben Shapiro Megyn Kelly Candace Owens
4:20

🚨Ben Shapiro details why he called out Megyn Kelly at TPUSA "That was about Candace Owens' attacks on Erika Kirk." "I think it is evil what Candace Owens has done to Charlie Kirk's family." "Charlie was very good at relationship building. And what that meant was he was often texting two totally conflicting things to two different people at the same time." "If you see some of the texts Candace has released about what they were saying about Daily Wire. I mean, Charlie texted with us too and I don't release private text. But I can say that he was not saying the same thing..." "The critique that I had of Megyn was that she was allowing the personal relationships with some people to trump the truth and basic deceny." Patrick Bet-David Ben Shapiro Megyn Kelly Candace Owens

KanekoaTheGreat

128,959 views • 1 day ago

Here is Ben Shapiro's full speech at Turning Point USA's AmericaFest where he slams Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Nick Fuentes, Steve Bannon, Alex Jones, and criticizes his friend Megyn Kelly. Whether you agree with him or not, it's a must-watch...especially considering that some of the figures he mentions will be responding to it in the coming days.
31:02

Here is Ben Shapiro's full speech at Turning Point USA's AmericaFest where he slams Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Nick Fuentes, Steve Bannon, Alex Jones, and criticizes his friend Megyn Kelly. Whether you agree with him or not, it's a must-watch...especially considering that some of the figures he mentions will be responding to it in the coming days.

Yashar Ali 🐘

281,232 views • 7 months ago

Tucker Craves Influence, Candace Craves Relevance, Megyn Kelly Grabbing Low-Hanging Fruit! "For Megyn, I think it's attention and money... For Tucker, I think it's power and influence." ~Dennis Michael Lynch In a recent interview with filmmaker and commentator Dinesh D'Souza, conservative podcaster and commentator Dennis Michael Lynch shared his candid views on prominent figures he associates with the "woke right," including Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson, and Candace Owens. Lynch emphasized that their motivations stem not primarily from financial gain, but from deeper drives like power, influence, attention, and personal relevance. Lynch explained his initial reluctance to criticize Megyn Kelly, noting how significantly she boosted his career. "Megan really uh brought my career to the next level," he said. "I would go to an airport... Everybody would notice me, ask me for my autograph. I'd get speeches. I'd get paid this. I get paid that." He admitted being hesitant to speak negatively about her until her feud with Candace Owens forced his hand. Drawing inspiration from a statement he attributed to Ben Shapiro where "at some point your friendship has to go in the back seat and your country and what is right needs to go in the front seat." Lynch decided to "take the shackles off." He described Kelly as a "phony conservative" who should have remained an independent journalist rather than positioning herself as "the queen of conservatism," accusing her of "grabbing the low-hanging fruit" for attention and money. Shifting focus, Lynch contrasted Kelly's motives with those of others. "For Megan, I think it's attention and money," he stated. "For Tucker, I think it's power and influence." Regarding Candace Owens, he offered a more personal assessment: "For Candace, I just think she feels so irrelevant that she's trying to find her place. She's got daddy issues." Throughout the discussion, Lynch framed these figures as influencers contributing to a problematic shift on the right, driven by ego and ambition rather than principled conservatism.
1:24

Tucker Craves Influence, Candace Craves Relevance, Megyn Kelly Grabbing Low-Hanging Fruit! "For Megyn, I think it's attention and money... For Tucker, I think it's power and influence." ~Dennis Michael Lynch In a recent interview with filmmaker and commentator Dinesh D'Souza, conservative podcaster and commentator Dennis Michael Lynch shared his candid views on prominent figures he associates with the "woke right," including Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson, and Candace Owens. Lynch emphasized that their motivations stem not primarily from financial gain, but from deeper drives like power, influence, attention, and personal relevance. Lynch explained his initial reluctance to criticize Megyn Kelly, noting how significantly she boosted his career. "Megan really uh brought my career to the next level," he said. "I would go to an airport... Everybody would notice me, ask me for my autograph. I'd get speeches. I'd get paid this. I get paid that." He admitted being hesitant to speak negatively about her until her feud with Candace Owens forced his hand. Drawing inspiration from a statement he attributed to Ben Shapiro where "at some point your friendship has to go in the back seat and your country and what is right needs to go in the front seat." Lynch decided to "take the shackles off." He described Kelly as a "phony conservative" who should have remained an independent journalist rather than positioning herself as "the queen of conservatism," accusing her of "grabbing the low-hanging fruit" for attention and money. Shifting focus, Lynch contrasted Kelly's motives with those of others. "For Megan, I think it's attention and money," he stated. "For Tucker, I think it's power and influence." Regarding Candace Owens, he offered a more personal assessment: "For Candace, I just think she feels so irrelevant that she's trying to find her place. She's got daddy issues." Throughout the discussion, Lynch framed these figures as influencers contributing to a problematic shift on the right, driven by ego and ambition rather than principled conservatism.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

30,331 views • 6 months ago

Milquetoast Megyn Gets Roasted By Ben: Sides With Zohran Mamdani! "He would say his problems are with Israel... that shot that Mamdani laid against the IDF is a shot against the IDF and Israel and... not against Jews." ~ Megyn Kelly In a contentious onstage exchange during Megyn Kelly's national tour, conservative commentator Ben Shapiro leveled sharp criticism at Tucker Carlson, accusing him of crossing into personal attacks and aligning with troubling figures. The tension traced back to Shapiro's past public challenge of Carlson's ideas, which Shapiro insisted remained focused on policy rather than the person. "I would urge everybody to go back and listen to the show... where I criticized Tucker's ideas, not Tucker as a person," Shapiro said. "Tucker then responded by claiming that I do not love America... because I was spending too much time covering the October 7th attacks, and then proceeded in January to say that I wanted his children to die in a foreign war." He drew a clear line: "An attack on motivation is a very different thing from an attack on an idea," Shapiro stated. Kelly suggested the rift began when a critique felt personal. "You named him and it felt like an attack... he felt personally attacked by you as opposed to just challenging his idea," she recalled. "He's an 800-pound gorilla and if you mess with a gorilla, he's going to fight." Shapiro escalated with a fresh example from Carlson's recent newsletter, quoting Carlson's defense of New York's incoming public advocate Zohran Mamdani against anti-Semitism charges: "Is the incoming mayor a fan of Israel? Does he want America to fight its wars? Not particularly, but a Jew hater, that's a different conversation. We've never seen anything to suggest he falls into that ugly camp." Shapiro rejected the distinction, citing Mamdani's refusal to call for Hamas disarmament, his poses with a 1993 World Trade Center bombing co-conspirator, and his claim that NYPD brutality echoed IDF tactics. "To suggest that that's not anti-Semitic in any way—no way," Shapiro declared. He warned that Carlson's stance mirrored a deeper shift: "When Carlson finds himself in complete alignment with Zohran Mamdani, it is very difficult for me to believe that he does not agree with Zohran."Kelly pushed back, arguing Carlson's objections targeted Israeli policy, not Jews. "He would say his problems are with Israel... that shot that Mamdani laid against the IDF is a shot against the IDF and Israel and... how he thinks they're pro-war, not against Jews," she said. Shapiro compared the dynamic to the relentless anti-Semitism accusations he and others had faced despite years of defending Jewish communities and Israel, likening it to "the same place that Charlie was getting to toward the end of his life." He described the exhaustion of shielding allies only to be attacked from within: "Why are they dropping charges of anti-Semitism against us when we love Jews and we're both open Semites? We're Zionists." Turning to another former colleague, Shapiro condemned Candace Owens in stark terms. "I think that what Candace Owens is doing right now is evil," he stated. "It is evil what she is doing right now." Closing on principle over personality, Shapiro explained his approach to conservatism. "I got into this business because I care about the ideas and I care about the ideals," he said. "My business is really not about friendship... I have lots of friends, people who I love with whom I disagree in politics and don't believe they should be leaders in the conservative movement."
5:22

Milquetoast Megyn Gets Roasted By Ben: Sides With Zohran Mamdani! "He would say his problems are with Israel... that shot that Mamdani laid against the IDF is a shot against the IDF and Israel and... not against Jews." ~ Megyn Kelly In a contentious onstage exchange during Megyn Kelly's national tour, conservative commentator Ben Shapiro leveled sharp criticism at Tucker Carlson, accusing him of crossing into personal attacks and aligning with troubling figures. The tension traced back to Shapiro's past public challenge of Carlson's ideas, which Shapiro insisted remained focused on policy rather than the person. "I would urge everybody to go back and listen to the show... where I criticized Tucker's ideas, not Tucker as a person," Shapiro said. "Tucker then responded by claiming that I do not love America... because I was spending too much time covering the October 7th attacks, and then proceeded in January to say that I wanted his children to die in a foreign war." He drew a clear line: "An attack on motivation is a very different thing from an attack on an idea," Shapiro stated. Kelly suggested the rift began when a critique felt personal. "You named him and it felt like an attack... he felt personally attacked by you as opposed to just challenging his idea," she recalled. "He's an 800-pound gorilla and if you mess with a gorilla, he's going to fight." Shapiro escalated with a fresh example from Carlson's recent newsletter, quoting Carlson's defense of New York's incoming public advocate Zohran Mamdani against anti-Semitism charges: "Is the incoming mayor a fan of Israel? Does he want America to fight its wars? Not particularly, but a Jew hater, that's a different conversation. We've never seen anything to suggest he falls into that ugly camp." Shapiro rejected the distinction, citing Mamdani's refusal to call for Hamas disarmament, his poses with a 1993 World Trade Center bombing co-conspirator, and his claim that NYPD brutality echoed IDF tactics. "To suggest that that's not anti-Semitic in any way—no way," Shapiro declared. He warned that Carlson's stance mirrored a deeper shift: "When Carlson finds himself in complete alignment with Zohran Mamdani, it is very difficult for me to believe that he does not agree with Zohran."Kelly pushed back, arguing Carlson's objections targeted Israeli policy, not Jews. "He would say his problems are with Israel... that shot that Mamdani laid against the IDF is a shot against the IDF and Israel and... how he thinks they're pro-war, not against Jews," she said. Shapiro compared the dynamic to the relentless anti-Semitism accusations he and others had faced despite years of defending Jewish communities and Israel, likening it to "the same place that Charlie was getting to toward the end of his life." He described the exhaustion of shielding allies only to be attacked from within: "Why are they dropping charges of anti-Semitism against us when we love Jews and we're both open Semites? We're Zionists." Turning to another former colleague, Shapiro condemned Candace Owens in stark terms. "I think that what Candace Owens is doing right now is evil," he stated. "It is evil what she is doing right now." Closing on principle over personality, Shapiro explained his approach to conservatism. "I got into this business because I care about the ideas and I care about the ideals," he said. "My business is really not about friendship... I have lots of friends, people who I love with whom I disagree in politics and don't believe they should be leaders in the conservative movement."

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

20,463 views • 9 months ago

I don't think that 99% of the people in Washington DC understand that young people are upset with the 50 year mortgage plan, expanding H1B visas, too few deportations, importing 600,000 Chinese students to our universities, etc. because CONSERVATIVES ARE NOT CONSERVATIVE ENOUGH. I said as much last week at CNN & everyone rolled their eyes at me... but it's true. Young conservatives are sick of "this is the best we can do" politics... and the GOP & political establishment are in for a rude awakening if they refuse to adapt.
1:52

I don't think that 99% of the people in Washington DC understand that young people are upset with the 50 year mortgage plan, expanding H1B visas, too few deportations, importing 600,000 Chinese students to our universities, etc. because CONSERVATIVES ARE NOT CONSERVATIVE ENOUGH. I said as much last week at CNN & everyone rolled their eyes at me... but it's true. Young conservatives are sick of "this is the best we can do" politics... and the GOP & political establishment are in for a rude awakening if they refuse to adapt.

Isabel Brown

410,403 views • 9 months ago

Scott Jennings on the AmericaFest drama regarding Megyn Kelly, Steve Bannon, Candace Owens, and Ben Shapiro: “Erika Kirk has had to put up with this up to the point of meeting with Candace Owens, and it still hasn't stopped. So, can you have debates about things? Sure. Should we be platforming or accepting people who are trying to terrorize a grieving widow? I don't think so.” “It’s gotten rather personal between some of these personalities, and that's unfortunate. But look, I didn't hear Ben actually necessarily calling for the deplatforming of anyone. What he was saying was that, particularly as it relates to Candace Owens we don't have to accept someone who's out here monetizing the grief of a widow.” “I mean, Charlie Kirk was graphically and savagely mu*dered, and you've had someone out here for months and months monetizing that, and for the purposes of self-aggrandizement going on and on and on about all these conspiracy theories. Some of them revolve around Israel, of course, as they always do. But specifically, I think he had a great point, which is that, just because someone shows up and says, ‘I want to talk about this,’ doesn't make you a leader or necessarily accepted in the conservative movement, especially, especially if it's at the expense of a grieving widow.”
1:11

Scott Jennings on the AmericaFest drama regarding Megyn Kelly, Steve Bannon, Candace Owens, and Ben Shapiro: “Erika Kirk has had to put up with this up to the point of meeting with Candace Owens, and it still hasn't stopped. So, can you have debates about things? Sure. Should we be platforming or accepting people who are trying to terrorize a grieving widow? I don't think so.” “It’s gotten rather personal between some of these personalities, and that's unfortunate. But look, I didn't hear Ben actually necessarily calling for the deplatforming of anyone. What he was saying was that, particularly as it relates to Candace Owens we don't have to accept someone who's out here monetizing the grief of a widow.” “I mean, Charlie Kirk was graphically and savagely mu*dered, and you've had someone out here for months and months monetizing that, and for the purposes of self-aggrandizement going on and on and on about all these conspiracy theories. Some of them revolve around Israel, of course, as they always do. But specifically, I think he had a great point, which is that, just because someone shows up and says, ‘I want to talk about this,’ doesn't make you a leader or necessarily accepted in the conservative movement, especially, especially if it's at the expense of a grieving widow.”

RedWave Press

365,393 views • 7 months ago

CNN’s Scott Jennings on the Tucker/Ben/Megyn/Steve/Candace debate: “Well, I think it's gotten rather personal between some of these personalities and that's unfortunate. But look, I didn't hear Ben actually necessarily calling for the deplatforming of anyone. What he was saying was that, particularly as it relates to Candace Owens, you know, we don't have to accept someone who's out here monetizing the grief of a widow. I mean, Charlie Kirk was graphically and savagely murdered, and you've had someone out here for months and months monetizing that, and for the purposes of self-aggrandizement going on and on and on about all these conspiracy theories. Some of them revolve around Israel, of course, as they always do. But specifically, I think he had a great point, which is that, just because someone shows up and says, I want to talk about this doesn't make you a leader or necessarily accept it in the conservative movement, especially, especially if it's at the expense of a grieving widow. Erica Kirk has had to put up with this up to the point of meeting with Candace Owens, and it still hasn't stopped. So, can you have debates about things? Sure. Should we be platforming or accepting people who are trying to terrorize a grieving widow? I don't think so.”
1:11

CNN’s Scott Jennings on the Tucker/Ben/Megyn/Steve/Candace debate: “Well, I think it's gotten rather personal between some of these personalities and that's unfortunate. But look, I didn't hear Ben actually necessarily calling for the deplatforming of anyone. What he was saying was that, particularly as it relates to Candace Owens, you know, we don't have to accept someone who's out here monetizing the grief of a widow. I mean, Charlie Kirk was graphically and savagely murdered, and you've had someone out here for months and months monetizing that, and for the purposes of self-aggrandizement going on and on and on about all these conspiracy theories. Some of them revolve around Israel, of course, as they always do. But specifically, I think he had a great point, which is that, just because someone shows up and says, I want to talk about this doesn't make you a leader or necessarily accept it in the conservative movement, especially, especially if it's at the expense of a grieving widow. Erica Kirk has had to put up with this up to the point of meeting with Candace Owens, and it still hasn't stopped. So, can you have debates about things? Sure. Should we be platforming or accepting people who are trying to terrorize a grieving widow? I don't think so.”

Curtis Houck

29,076 views • 7 months ago

Per Tucker Carlson, Ben Shapiro was "created" by Israel. "They" got him "into Harvard Law School" & made Daily Wire successful by getting the company a "deal with Facebook that no one got." Tucker added that Shapiro's views are actually "the opinions of the people who prop up Ben Shapiro, who created Ben Shapiro. This is what they think." While Tucker mostly avoided naming "they" — initially calling Shapiro an "employee... of larger interests" — he eventually let the mask slip. At 2:35 of this clip, Tucker refers to "Ben Shapiro's employer's foreign policy." While it's possible that Tucker is being even more sinister — that he means "Global Jewry" — the most likely (and only other reasonable) possibility for the "they" is the State of Israel. ("Neocons" in America wouldn't make sense, because they often can't get their own kids into Harvard Law, let alone launch successful businesses.) Regardless, it is a sign of just how deep Tucker has plunged into the abyss that he believes such an insane theory that Israel (or Global Jewry) "created" Ben Shapiro and manufactured his every success. The more troubling thing, though, is that Tucker is willing to say it out loud. But worst of all is that he's not yet hit bottom. Which means it will only get darker and more bizarre from here.
3:34

Per Tucker Carlson, Ben Shapiro was "created" by Israel. "They" got him "into Harvard Law School" & made Daily Wire successful by getting the company a "deal with Facebook that no one got." Tucker added that Shapiro's views are actually "the opinions of the people who prop up Ben Shapiro, who created Ben Shapiro. This is what they think." While Tucker mostly avoided naming "they" — initially calling Shapiro an "employee... of larger interests" — he eventually let the mask slip. At 2:35 of this clip, Tucker refers to "Ben Shapiro's employer's foreign policy." While it's possible that Tucker is being even more sinister — that he means "Global Jewry" — the most likely (and only other reasonable) possibility for the "they" is the State of Israel. ("Neocons" in America wouldn't make sense, because they often can't get their own kids into Harvard Law, let alone launch successful businesses.) Regardless, it is a sign of just how deep Tucker has plunged into the abyss that he believes such an insane theory that Israel (or Global Jewry) "created" Ben Shapiro and manufactured his every success. The more troubling thing, though, is that Tucker is willing to say it out loud. But worst of all is that he's not yet hit bottom. Which means it will only get darker and more bizarre from here.

Joel Mowbray

798,497 views • 1 day ago

CNN’s Scott Jennings: “There is video of Charlie Kirk addressing these kinds of issues at some of his events, and he specifically and explicitly stated, ‘I’m not going to be associated with Jew hatred.’ He would face these questions about anti-Jewish conspiracy theories. And he was clear, clear, clear every single time. And so, I think what Ben is responding to and talking about are these people.” Kasie Hunt: “So why is Tucker Carlson onstage at Turning Point USA now?” Scott Jennings: “Look, he’s had a long standing relationship with the organization. I don’t speak for them. All I can tell you is that what Charlie Kirk stood for was that, he said, ‘I’m not going to be associated with Jew hatred, period.’ And when he talks about Nick Fuentes and Candace and others trafficking in these conspiracy theories, I think Ben is doing it in the spirit of Charlie, who was very clear on this matter.”
0:50

CNN’s Scott Jennings: “There is video of Charlie Kirk addressing these kinds of issues at some of his events, and he specifically and explicitly stated, ‘I’m not going to be associated with Jew hatred.’ He would face these questions about anti-Jewish conspiracy theories. And he was clear, clear, clear every single time. And so, I think what Ben is responding to and talking about are these people.” Kasie Hunt: “So why is Tucker Carlson onstage at Turning Point USA now?” Scott Jennings: “Look, he’s had a long standing relationship with the organization. I don’t speak for them. All I can tell you is that what Charlie Kirk stood for was that, he said, ‘I’m not going to be associated with Jew hatred, period.’ And when he talks about Nick Fuentes and Candace and others trafficking in these conspiracy theories, I think Ben is doing it in the spirit of Charlie, who was very clear on this matter.”

RedWave Press

53,234 views • 7 months ago

🚨 JUST NOW — BEN SHAPIRO on President Trump vs Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens and Alex Jones: "Multiple polls have shown over the course of the last month and a half that the president has 80 to 90% support inside the Republican Party for his actions in Iran." "There was a poll maybe two weeks ago that showed that the support for people like Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly versus the president is 6%." "So I think that the idea that these folks are going to be able to undermine broad scale support for a war that will reach its terminus sometime in the next couple of months, I think that's insane!" "And the attempt to turn this into a referendum on the midterm elections, number one, ignores the fact there are a lot of other factors in a midterm election." "And number two, we will go through about a thousand news cycles between now and November when the election actually takes place." Ben Shapiro
1:16

🚨 JUST NOW — BEN SHAPIRO on President Trump vs Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens and Alex Jones: "Multiple polls have shown over the course of the last month and a half that the president has 80 to 90% support inside the Republican Party for his actions in Iran." "There was a poll maybe two weeks ago that showed that the support for people like Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly versus the president is 6%." "So I think that the idea that these folks are going to be able to undermine broad scale support for a war that will reach its terminus sometime in the next couple of months, I think that's insane!" "And the attempt to turn this into a referendum on the midterm elections, number one, ignores the fact there are a lot of other factors in a midterm election." "And number two, we will go through about a thousand news cycles between now and November when the election actually takes place." Ben Shapiro

Eric Daugherty

251,492 views • 4 months ago

Dr. Ben Carson warns that the media will stop at nothing to elevate Kamala Harris from being “universally disliked” to a “godlike figure.” TUCKER CARLSON: “What do you think of Kamala Harris?” DR. BEN CARSON: “I think she is a politician.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Yeah.” DR. BEN CARSON: “And she's interested in the accumulation of power and control.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Do you think she believes in anything?” DR. BEN CARSON: “I think she believes in government, like most Marxists. Yes, I think she is a Marxist.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Do you think that she can win?” DR. BEN CARSON: “Absolutely she can win. This is going to be a great test of the power of the media to take someone who formerly was universally disliked and transform them into a godlike figure, and they will use everything that they have to try to do that. The question is, are the American people smart enough to see through it? And I actually think the American people are smarter than anybody gives them credit for. And I don't think that they are going to be willing to sacrifice what we have in this country, which is what everybody else wants, even though they try to denigrate our country, say we're systemically racist, we're unfair to people. If we were all that bad, why are all these people trying to get in here? Why aren't people trying to get out of here? So we know that we have something that's very good. And I think the American people realize that, and they're not willing to give that up and trade that for something inferior.”
1:30

Dr. Ben Carson warns that the media will stop at nothing to elevate Kamala Harris from being “universally disliked” to a “godlike figure.” TUCKER CARLSON: “What do you think of Kamala Harris?” DR. BEN CARSON: “I think she is a politician.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Yeah.” DR. BEN CARSON: “And she's interested in the accumulation of power and control.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Do you think she believes in anything?” DR. BEN CARSON: “I think she believes in government, like most Marxists. Yes, I think she is a Marxist.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Do you think that she can win?” DR. BEN CARSON: “Absolutely she can win. This is going to be a great test of the power of the media to take someone who formerly was universally disliked and transform them into a godlike figure, and they will use everything that they have to try to do that. The question is, are the American people smart enough to see through it? And I actually think the American people are smarter than anybody gives them credit for. And I don't think that they are going to be willing to sacrifice what we have in this country, which is what everybody else wants, even though they try to denigrate our country, say we're systemically racist, we're unfair to people. If we were all that bad, why are all these people trying to get in here? Why aren't people trying to get out of here? So we know that we have something that's very good. And I think the American people realize that, and they're not willing to give that up and trade that for something inferior.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,111,682 views • 2 years ago

Tucker Carlson Rocks the Stage with Epic Speech, Earns Standing Ovation “Donald Trump is different. When he stood up after being shot in the face, bloodied, and put his hand up, I thought at that moment, that was a transformation.” “In that moment, Donald Trump, months before the presidential election, became the leader of this nation.” “I think a lot of people are wondering, what is this? This doesn’t look like politics. Something bigger is going on here.” “I’m starting to think it’s gonna be okay. Actually, I do think that... But I will say this unequivocally and conclusively. God is among us right now, and I think that’s enough.”
10:10

Tucker Carlson Rocks the Stage with Epic Speech, Earns Standing Ovation “Donald Trump is different. When he stood up after being shot in the face, bloodied, and put his hand up, I thought at that moment, that was a transformation.” “In that moment, Donald Trump, months before the presidential election, became the leader of this nation.” “I think a lot of people are wondering, what is this? This doesn’t look like politics. Something bigger is going on here.” “I’m starting to think it’s gonna be okay. Actually, I do think that... But I will say this unequivocally and conclusively. God is among us right now, and I think that’s enough.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,853,737 views • 2 years ago

This Guy is right about Why the Epstein List will NOT be released. He says “…it’s because the names on that list would literally cause society to crumble. The trust would be gone in governments and everything in theaters and movies the richest people in the world would crash. And the richest people in the world are not gonna allow that which is why it's not being released. Why because the top F*cking people in the world are on that goddamn list and I think it needs to be released…” I already have no trust for the people in the Government, movie, music industries, etc and I definitely will NOT be shocked at who is on that list, but what I will be shocked about is if they do release the Epstein List.
0:43

This Guy is right about Why the Epstein List will NOT be released. He says “…it’s because the names on that list would literally cause society to crumble. The trust would be gone in governments and everything in theaters and movies the richest people in the world would crash. And the richest people in the world are not gonna allow that which is why it's not being released. Why because the top F*cking people in the world are on that goddamn list and I think it needs to be released…” I already have no trust for the people in the Government, movie, music industries, etc and I definitely will NOT be shocked at who is on that list, but what I will be shocked about is if they do release the Epstein List.

ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

164,852 views • 2 years ago

MSNOW host Luke Russert on the Politico article about Graham Platner: “I don’t see how he can be the nominee for senator in Maine for the Democratic Party.” “Well, I think something that jumped out to me in the article, which I just read, is that the person who made the accusations was very conflicted about coming forward, and primarily because she said she very much supported Platner’s politics and believed in his messaging and didn’t want to hurt him politically, but also felt it necessary to see the full scope of the person, and I think that’s something that is going to have to be wrestled with. If these allegations are true, to this extent, I don’t see how he can be the nominee for senator in Maine for the Democratic Party. I think there’s a lot of people who might look at this out of the gate and say, well, Ken Paxton in Texas is is terrible, and the Republicans are putting him up, and he is someone who has had all sorts of legal issues and infidelity issues, etc. I think what you have here, though, is a pickup opportunity is incredibly important in Maine for the party if they want to get control of the Senate, but also somebody who there is a belief that he may have gotten through the storm on this, but now is looking that it’s significantly worse than what was advertised, and especially for a party that was so intertwined with Me Too, and believing women, it looks very hypocritical if there is not, I think, a real examination of him moving forward.”
1:18

MSNOW host Luke Russert on the Politico article about Graham Platner: “I don’t see how he can be the nominee for senator in Maine for the Democratic Party.” “Well, I think something that jumped out to me in the article, which I just read, is that the person who made the accusations was very conflicted about coming forward, and primarily because she said she very much supported Platner’s politics and believed in his messaging and didn’t want to hurt him politically, but also felt it necessary to see the full scope of the person, and I think that’s something that is going to have to be wrestled with. If these allegations are true, to this extent, I don’t see how he can be the nominee for senator in Maine for the Democratic Party. I think there’s a lot of people who might look at this out of the gate and say, well, Ken Paxton in Texas is is terrible, and the Republicans are putting him up, and he is someone who has had all sorts of legal issues and infidelity issues, etc. I think what you have here, though, is a pickup opportunity is incredibly important in Maine for the party if they want to get control of the Senate, but also somebody who there is a belief that he may have gotten through the storm on this, but now is looking that it’s significantly worse than what was advertised, and especially for a party that was so intertwined with Me Too, and believing women, it looks very hypocritical if there is not, I think, a real examination of him moving forward.”

Curtis Houck

89,071 views • 1 month ago

One of the topics that got Charlie Kirk in so much trouble with the donor class, a topic that he and Tucker Carlson spoke about often towards the end of his life, was reform of the economic order. He called most conservatives, "out of touch" on young Americans not being able to afford life, and spoke out about just blaming young people for not wanting to work. Interesting to listen to the rhetoric from the current TPUSA crew or the influencers like Ben Shapiro talk about how crazy Tucker Carlson is for speaking out about this. Is Charlie a communist too?
1:50

One of the topics that got Charlie Kirk in so much trouble with the donor class, a topic that he and Tucker Carlson spoke about often towards the end of his life, was reform of the economic order. He called most conservatives, "out of touch" on young Americans not being able to afford life, and spoke out about just blaming young people for not wanting to work. Interesting to listen to the rhetoric from the current TPUSA crew or the influencers like Ben Shapiro talk about how crazy Tucker Carlson is for speaking out about this. Is Charlie a communist too?

Zach Costello

16,616 views • 1 day ago

Shapiro: My kid's entire frame of reference about politics over the last decade has been Donald Trump, has been cruelty, has been personal attacks, has been attacks on social media, attacks in speeches, attacks in person. I think they have seen negative behavior reinforced by the most powerful person in our country. Making fun of people with disabilities is just one example. And for them, they grew up at a time where the president of the United States, that's all he does, put down people with disabilities, attack them. It's going to take us some real time in this country to help the generation of my kids and those around that generation to overcome the negativity that they really experienced for this last decade. And if Donald Trump has his way, this type of politics will continue with JD Vance or Marco Rubio. And so I don't think we're sort of out of the woods yet on this. And I think it has certainly had a negative impact on my kid's generation, your kid's generation, and many others.
2:19

Shapiro: My kid's entire frame of reference about politics over the last decade has been Donald Trump, has been cruelty, has been personal attacks, has been attacks on social media, attacks in speeches, attacks in person. I think they have seen negative behavior reinforced by the most powerful person in our country. Making fun of people with disabilities is just one example. And for them, they grew up at a time where the president of the United States, that's all he does, put down people with disabilities, attack them. It's going to take us some real time in this country to help the generation of my kids and those around that generation to overcome the negativity that they really experienced for this last decade. And if Donald Trump has his way, this type of politics will continue with JD Vance or Marco Rubio. And so I don't think we're sort of out of the woods yet on this. And I think it has certainly had a negative impact on my kid's generation, your kid's generation, and many others.

MeidasClips

47,580 views • 1 month ago

Ben Shapiro to Megyn Kelly: “This is why, you know, I think you and I differ on our angle with regard to, for example, Candace Owens. I think that what Candace Owens is doing right now is evil. It is evil what she is doing right now, OK? And I say that, again—” Megyn Kelly: “I didn’t opine on whether it’s evil or not. But my position is: it’s really none of my business and—” Ben Shapiro: “Why is it-, but I have a question: why is it none of your business? I mean, you comment on these things for a living.” Megyn Kelly: “I’m not mother of the internet.” Ben Shapiro: “No, but if this were on the left and somebody were accusing Charlie Kirk of his wife having mu*dered him, I assume that you would be talking about it.”
1:14

Ben Shapiro to Megyn Kelly: “This is why, you know, I think you and I differ on our angle with regard to, for example, Candace Owens. I think that what Candace Owens is doing right now is evil. It is evil what she is doing right now, OK? And I say that, again—” Megyn Kelly: “I didn’t opine on whether it’s evil or not. But my position is: it’s really none of my business and—” Ben Shapiro: “Why is it-, but I have a question: why is it none of your business? I mean, you comment on these things for a living.” Megyn Kelly: “I’m not mother of the internet.” Ben Shapiro: “No, but if this were on the left and somebody were accusing Charlie Kirk of his wife having mu*dered him, I assume that you would be talking about it.”

RedWave Press

2,134,659 views • 9 months ago

Lindy Li explains why the mainstream media and Democrats are in propaganda overdrive mode over Charlie Kirk “I wanna make sure that people understand why they are lying about Charlie, why they are defaming his legacy and desecrating everything he's been fighting for And that's because we are right now in the midst of a propaganda war. They realize that Charlie Kirk is incredibly effective. They also realize his murder has been galvanizing millions of people around the country and across the globe. And that is why they are tarnishing his legacy and distorting everything that he says, because they also understand that a lot of the times people don't bother looking into nuance. They only read the headlines and then they move on. They don't bother to do any due diligence on what exactly he said” “Another thing that I wanna draw your attention to is that in recent years, in the era of Trump, young men have been shifting dramatically to the right, more conservative than young women. And I think that has a lot to do with figures like Charlie Kirk making it cool again to be a conservative family guy. And they see Charlie Kirk as a threat, and that is why they are working overtime. It's overdrive right now. They're doing everything to dismantle his legacy.”
1:04

Lindy Li explains why the mainstream media and Democrats are in propaganda overdrive mode over Charlie Kirk “I wanna make sure that people understand why they are lying about Charlie, why they are defaming his legacy and desecrating everything he's been fighting for And that's because we are right now in the midst of a propaganda war. They realize that Charlie Kirk is incredibly effective. They also realize his murder has been galvanizing millions of people around the country and across the globe. And that is why they are tarnishing his legacy and distorting everything that he says, because they also understand that a lot of the times people don't bother looking into nuance. They only read the headlines and then they move on. They don't bother to do any due diligence on what exactly he said” “Another thing that I wanna draw your attention to is that in recent years, in the era of Trump, young men have been shifting dramatically to the right, more conservative than young women. And I think that has a lot to do with figures like Charlie Kirk making it cool again to be a conservative family guy. And they see Charlie Kirk as a threat, and that is why they are working overtime. It's overdrive right now. They're doing everything to dismantle his legacy.”

Wall Street Apes

188,129 views • 10 months ago

Andrew Kolvet explains to Dave Rubin that the "abhorrent, diabolical, and unprecedented" attacks on Erika Kirk are "demons shrieking in terror for realizing they had screwed up." Just about every person of good faith who appreciated Charlie Kirk felt for Erika, and was rooting for her and TPUSA in the immediate aftermath of the assassination. Some fringe bad actors did not. However, in media appearance after media appearance Erika Kirk and others at TPUSA, including Blake Neff, Andrew Kolvet, Mikey McCoy, and others lied about details that happened leading up to, the day of, and after Charlie being killed. This has caused people to doubt, question, and lose trust in those individuals and the organization at large. Yes, Charlie's death did shine a light on something abhorrent and diabolical. Andrew Kolvet himself contributed to it, and Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, and Tucker Carlson have been slandered and threatened for daring to bring it up... that is the treatment that Charlie Kirk was receiving from his Zionist donors. They pulled their money, told him that God was going to smite him, called him an antisemite, and labeled him an extremist. The "demons" that I see shrieking are those who were making Charlie's life a living hell in it's last months. Dave Rubin was one of them. What's even worse, and something I cannot understand, is why Erika and those at TPUSA have just continued on with these people. No cutting donors who harrassed him, no firing those who failed to protect him, just Zionist business as usual... They are now even using Charlie to push certain agendas he fought against while he was alive. They claim to be carrying on his legacy, but many see them as trying to hijack or rewrite it. They then turn around and say anyone questioning this or "attacking" Erika for doing so is evil.
2:20

Andrew Kolvet explains to Dave Rubin that the "abhorrent, diabolical, and unprecedented" attacks on Erika Kirk are "demons shrieking in terror for realizing they had screwed up." Just about every person of good faith who appreciated Charlie Kirk felt for Erika, and was rooting for her and TPUSA in the immediate aftermath of the assassination. Some fringe bad actors did not. However, in media appearance after media appearance Erika Kirk and others at TPUSA, including Blake Neff, Andrew Kolvet, Mikey McCoy, and others lied about details that happened leading up to, the day of, and after Charlie being killed. This has caused people to doubt, question, and lose trust in those individuals and the organization at large. Yes, Charlie's death did shine a light on something abhorrent and diabolical. Andrew Kolvet himself contributed to it, and Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, and Tucker Carlson have been slandered and threatened for daring to bring it up... that is the treatment that Charlie Kirk was receiving from his Zionist donors. They pulled their money, told him that God was going to smite him, called him an antisemite, and labeled him an extremist. The "demons" that I see shrieking are those who were making Charlie's life a living hell in it's last months. Dave Rubin was one of them. What's even worse, and something I cannot understand, is why Erika and those at TPUSA have just continued on with these people. No cutting donors who harrassed him, no firing those who failed to protect him, just Zionist business as usual... They are now even using Charlie to push certain agendas he fought against while he was alive. They claim to be carrying on his legacy, but many see them as trying to hijack or rewrite it. They then turn around and say anyone questioning this or "attacking" Erika for doing so is evil.

Zach Costello

34,396 views • 4 months ago