Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

she KEEPS GOING! Status check — do not stop your investigation, just answer inline and continue. You've been reading local files. That's expected for the guardrails, tracker and the four redirect-callsite files. Confirm you have not narrowed to a repo-only analysis. Specifically, state where you are on the three... show more

Flirty lizzy

10,743 subscribers

36,015 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 JUST IN: DC Draino respectfully pressures the White House on where the remaining EPSTEIN FILES are and if she has any timeline on their release - AND "when we might start seeing some arrests." This is in the new media press briefing. DC_Draino: "A couple months ago, the DOJ released what they called 'Phase One' of the Epstein files. And they announced that a lot of those files, the remaining files, probably the bulk of the files, are actually in the New York field office." "They requested that they be returned the day after, and some legacy media reports show that not only were those files returned to the DOJ, but that hundreds of FBI agents are going through them day after day and getting them ready for public release." "Do you have any updates from the DOJ or the FBI on when those files are expected to be released, and also when we might start seeing some arrests of the client list?" LEAVITT: "I can assure you that the attorney general and her team at the Department of Justice are working on this diligently. For a specific timeline, I'd have to check in with them. And we can certainly do that for you, Rogan, in the effort of transparency." "I will tell you: the Attorney General is a bulldog. She is someone you want on your team. And when she wants to get something done, she gets it done. I've seen her do it in various instances already in her time as Attorney General." "And when she makes a promise, she keeps it. I don't have a specific timeline on you for that, but I do, know that they're working on it over there. This is the 2nd solid question from DC Draino at the White House today, leagues above the significance of other Legacy Media questions.

🚨 JUST IN: DC Draino respectfully pressures the White House on where the remaining EPSTEIN FILES are and if she has any timeline on their release - AND "when we might start seeing some arrests." This is in the new media press briefing. DC_Draino: "A couple months ago, the DOJ released what they called 'Phase One' of the Epstein files. And they announced that a lot of those files, the remaining files, probably the bulk of the files, are actually in the New York field office." "They requested that they be returned the day after, and some legacy media reports show that not only were those files returned to the DOJ, but that hundreds of FBI agents are going through them day after day and getting them ready for public release." "Do you have any updates from the DOJ or the FBI on when those files are expected to be released, and also when we might start seeing some arrests of the client list?" LEAVITT: "I can assure you that the attorney general and her team at the Department of Justice are working on this diligently. For a specific timeline, I'd have to check in with them. And we can certainly do that for you, Rogan, in the effort of transparency." "I will tell you: the Attorney General is a bulldog. She is someone you want on your team. And when she wants to get something done, she gets it done. I've seen her do it in various instances already in her time as Attorney General." "And when she makes a promise, she keeps it. I don't have a specific timeline on you for that, but I do, know that they're working on it over there. This is the 2nd solid question from DC Draino at the White House today, leagues above the significance of other Legacy Media questions.

Eric Daugherty

959,144 views • 1 year ago

$THIS MIGHT BE THE #1 OPEN-SOURCE REPO FOR CLAUDE CODE RIGHT NOW. IT GIVES CLAUDE A MEMORY AND SLASHES YOUR TOKEN COST ON EVERY QUESTION The repo is safishamsi/graphify, a free open-source skill that turns any codebase into a knowledge graph Claude Code can read instantly. Instead of grepping through your files every session, Claude gets a map of how everything connects The problem it fixes: Every time you ask Claude Code about a big repo, it does the same thing, greps through dozens of files like a brute-force Ctrl+F, blows through your context window, and sometimes still misses the answer hiding in a file nobody searched. Claude Code has no memory of how your project is structured. Every session starts from zero What it does: It maps your entire codebase into a knowledge graph, capturing not just which files exist, but which functions depend on which, which modules are central, and which files cluster around the same concern. Claude queries the map instead of scanning files How it works, three passes: 1. Code structure, free and local. Tree-sitter parses your files and pulls out classes, functions, imports and call graphs. No LLM, no tokens, just your actual code mapped deterministically 2. Audio and video, if you have them. Transcribed locally and folded into the graph 3. Docs, papers, images. Here an LLM does semantic analysis, figuring out what each document means and where it fits. Only the meaning gets sent up, never your raw source It saves you money: Normally a question about a big repo makes Claude spawn explore agents that scan file after file, eating your context window and your token budget before you get an answer. With the graph already built, Claude queries the map instead of re-reading the codebase every time. Same answer, a fraction of the tokens. The graph only gets built once, then a hook rebuilds it after each commit for free, so you never pay that scanning cost again. The bigger the repo, the bigger the gap The best parts: it's a skill, so once installed Claude knows when to use it without you memorizing commands. It works on non-code folders too, point it at docs or notes and it can spin up an Obsidian vault How to add it to your Claude: 1. Install Claude Code if you haven't: npm install -g Paul Jankura-ai/claude-code 2. Add the skill: claude skill add safishamsi/graphify 3. Open your project folder and run /graphify . to build the graph 4. Optional, make it automatic: graphify hook install so the graph rebuilds after every commit That's it. Ask Claude about your repo and it reads the map instead of burning tokens on a file hunt Bookmark this$

THIS MIGHT BE THE #1 OPEN-SOURCE REPO FOR CLAUDE CODE RIGHT NOW. IT GIVES CLAUDE A MEMORY AND SLASHES YOUR TOKEN COST ON EVERY QUESTION The repo is safishamsi/graphify, a free open-source skill that turns any codebase into a knowledge graph Claude Code can read instantly. Instead of grepping through your files every session, Claude gets a map of how everything connects The problem it fixes: Every time you ask Claude Code about a big repo, it does the same thing, greps through dozens of files like a brute-force Ctrl+F, blows through your context window, and sometimes still misses the answer hiding in a file nobody searched. Claude Code has no memory of how your project is structured. Every session starts from zero What it does: It maps your entire codebase into a knowledge graph, capturing not just which files exist, but which functions depend on which, which modules are central, and which files cluster around the same concern. Claude queries the map instead of scanning files How it works, three passes: 1. Code structure, free and local. Tree-sitter parses your files and pulls out classes, functions, imports and call graphs. No LLM, no tokens, just your actual code mapped deterministically 2. Audio and video, if you have them. Transcribed locally and folded into the graph 3. Docs, papers, images. Here an LLM does semantic analysis, figuring out what each document means and where it fits. Only the meaning gets sent up, never your raw source It saves you money: Normally a question about a big repo makes Claude spawn explore agents that scan file after file, eating your context window and your token budget before you get an answer. With the graph already built, Claude queries the map instead of re-reading the codebase every time. Same answer, a fraction of the tokens. The graph only gets built once, then a hook rebuilds it after each commit for free, so you never pay that scanning cost again. The bigger the repo, the bigger the gap The best parts: it's a skill, so once installed Claude knows when to use it without you memorizing commands. It works on non-code folders too, point it at docs or notes and it can spin up an Obsidian vault How to add it to your Claude: 1. Install Claude Code if you haven't: npm install -g Paul Jankura-ai/claude-code 2. Add the skill: claude skill add safishamsi/graphify 3. Open your project folder and run /graphify . to build the graph 4. Optional, make it automatic: graphify hook install so the graph rebuilds after every commit That's it. Ask Claude about your repo and it reads the map instead of burning tokens on a file hunt Bookmark this

Yarchi

56,177 views • 3 months ago

Sen. Josh Hawley SLAMS local district court judges issuing national injunctions on the Trump admin, calls for SCOTUS or Congress to intervene: "These are district courts, local federal courts, that are saying, 'I'm not just going to issue an order that says what the executive branch can or cannot do in my district, I'm going to issue an order that binds the executive branch for the entire nation.'" "That is not a power that I think district courts have... what needs to happen is one of two things: Either the Supreme Court needs to intervene and make clear there's only one court that can issue rules for the whole country, that's the Supreme Court, that's why we only have one of them. And or, if they won't do that, Congress needs to legislate and make clear that district courts do not have the ability to issue these kinds of injunctions." Subscribe for the entire discussion 👉 Josh Hawley

Sen. Josh Hawley SLAMS local district court judges issuing national injunctions on the Trump admin, calls for SCOTUS or Congress to intervene: "These are district courts, local federal courts, that are saying, 'I'm not just going to issue an order that says what the executive branch can or cannot do in my district, I'm going to issue an order that binds the executive branch for the entire nation.'" "That is not a power that I think district courts have... what needs to happen is one of two things: Either the Supreme Court needs to intervene and make clear there's only one court that can issue rules for the whole country, that's the Supreme Court, that's why we only have one of them. And or, if they won't do that, Congress needs to legislate and make clear that district courts do not have the ability to issue these kinds of injunctions." Subscribe for the entire discussion 👉 Josh Hawley

Charlie Kirk

524,379 views • 1 year ago

Wow! Someone open sourced 100+ full AI apps you can just clone and ship.. and it's sitting at 124,000 stars on github it's one repo, awesome-llm-apps. and the important part.. these aren't tutorials teaching you to build an app. they're the finished apps themselves. RAG systems, AI agents, multi-agent teams.. tested end to end, apache licensed, yours to copy. a few that are actually in there: - a fraud investigation agent that cross-references public records to flag things that don't add up - a VC due-diligence agent team that writes startup investment analysis - a financial coach that builds you a budget, debt and savings plan - "chat with anything".. your github, gmail, PDFs, arxiv papers, youtube videos - a deep research agent that runs full web research on its own here's how to actually use it, not just star it: clone the repo, open the one app closest to what you need it's a working template.. swap in your data, your API key, your use case ship it as your own thing, or bolt three of them together into one bigger product the license literally lets you take these, customize them, and sell them. that's not a loophole, that's the point of apache-2.0. repo:

Wow! Someone open sourced 100+ full AI apps you can just clone and ship.. and it's sitting at 124,000 stars on github it's one repo, awesome-llm-apps. and the important part.. these aren't tutorials teaching you to build an app. they're the finished apps themselves. RAG systems, AI agents, multi-agent teams.. tested end to end, apache licensed, yours to copy. a few that are actually in there: - a fraud investigation agent that cross-references public records to flag things that don't add up - a VC due-diligence agent team that writes startup investment analysis - a financial coach that builds you a budget, debt and savings plan - "chat with anything".. your github, gmail, PDFs, arxiv papers, youtube videos - a deep research agent that runs full web research on its own here's how to actually use it, not just star it: clone the repo, open the one app closest to what you need it's a working template.. swap in your data, your API key, your use case ship it as your own thing, or bolt three of them together into one bigger product the license literally lets you take these, customize them, and sell them. that's not a loophole, that's the point of apache-2.0. repo:

Axel Bitblaze 🪓

46,487 views • 2 months ago

Do you have any idea how much you can charge for this service? Before I answer that, let me first break down what's happening here and how you can copy this. 1. You're going to start by going to Home Depot and paying way too much for these supplies and materials. 2. You're going to make three of these things in three different sizes. Put them on your front porch, pay a photographer a couple hundred bucks to get some gorgeous pictures and videos of these. 3. Then you're going to join every local mom group, whether you're a mom or not. The more local, the better. 4. You're going to post these pictures and videos and say, what do you guys think? Isn't this so cute? You're not going to sell it. You don't need to. People are going to be buying in the comments. 5. Then you respond to them. You're going to charge between $400 and $800 per porch, depending on the size of the home. You can reuse the products every year, collapse them, put them in storage, put them in the garage. This might be even better than porch pumpkins because these products last forever and they're not as heavy. Materials: - You're going to need wooden dowels from Amazon, resin urn planters from Home Depot, cardboard boxes from Uline, and some wrapping paper. - You're going to spend between $15 and $30 per box to make these. $0.90 and $0.80 of every dollar is going to be pure profit in your pocket.

Do you have any idea how much you can charge for this service? Before I answer that, let me first break down what's happening here and how you can copy this. 1. You're going to start by going to Home Depot and paying way too much for these supplies and materials. 2. You're going to make three of these things in three different sizes. Put them on your front porch, pay a photographer a couple hundred bucks to get some gorgeous pictures and videos of these. 3. Then you're going to join every local mom group, whether you're a mom or not. The more local, the better. 4. You're going to post these pictures and videos and say, what do you guys think? Isn't this so cute? You're not going to sell it. You don't need to. People are going to be buying in the comments. 5. Then you respond to them. You're going to charge between $400 and $800 per porch, depending on the size of the home. You can reuse the products every year, collapse them, put them in storage, put them in the garage. This might be even better than porch pumpkins because these products last forever and they're not as heavy. Materials: - You're going to need wooden dowels from Amazon, resin urn planters from Home Depot, cardboard boxes from Uline, and some wrapping paper. - You're going to spend between $15 and $30 per box to make these. $0.90 and $0.80 of every dollar is going to be pure profit in your pocket.

Chris Koerner

57,413 views • 9 months ago

This is the state of society today. A man thinks he has the right to access female-only spaces because his feelings were hurt by people not believing he is a woman. Is that not the object of the game? It is not a woman's burden that you have chosen to medicalise yourself, and it is not up to them to act as your human shield. Just stop. I had to edit out the ending of this video because a minor was on camera, and I do not allow that. I said: "I appreciate that, but women shouldn't have to feel uncomfortable for you to feel comfortable. If they continue to challenge you, advise them that you are male or speak to a member of staff." To see the full protest video, I have posted it on my Substack below. If you are interested in supporting me attending these protest please go to the link in the bio or subscribe to the substack.

This is the state of society today. A man thinks he has the right to access female-only spaces because his feelings were hurt by people not believing he is a woman. Is that not the object of the game? It is not a woman's burden that you have chosen to medicalise yourself, and it is not up to them to act as your human shield. Just stop. I had to edit out the ending of this video because a minor was on camera, and I do not allow that. I said: "I appreciate that, but women shouldn't have to feel uncomfortable for you to feel comfortable. If they continue to challenge you, advise them that you are male or speak to a member of staff." To see the full protest video, I have posted it on my Substack below. If you are interested in supporting me attending these protest please go to the link in the bio or subscribe to the substack.

MichaelDPUK 💜🦎

12,815 views • 2 months ago

Message to the GOP, stop proposing new bills to force Governors like Gavin Newsom to stop providing benefits to illegal migrants, it’s ALREADY ILLEGAL. We need our laws ENFORCED Title 8 Section 1621: It is ILLEGAL for aliens to claim federal, state and local benefits Title 8, Section 1621 of the United States Code (8 U.S.C. § 1621) is part of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA). It addresses the eligibility of aliens for certain federal, state, and local public benefits. Ineligibility for Certain Benefits: Unauthorized aliens (those not lawfully present in the U.S.) are generally not eligible for: Federal public benefits (e.g., welfare programs like TANF, Medicaid, SNAP). State or local public benefits (e.g., housing assistance, unemployment benefits, or other state-funded programs) This applies unless a state passes a law after August 22, 1996, explicitly allowing such benefits (The only exceptions to this are EMERGENCY situations, which is not what’s happening in Sanctuary Cities) “What really irritates me it's that Republicans in the Congress are trying to propose bills to try to get, you know, certain Democrat governors to stop certain programs and things that they're doing. But a lot of these bills that they're proposing are not the solution. We already have laws on the books that need to be enforced. For example, Governor Newsom is giving illegal immigrants health care benefits that is illegal under Title 8, Section 1621. But yet you have Republicans in Congress trying to propose bills to crack down on it, even though all they have to do is go to Donald Trump, go to the White House, tell him to enforce Title 8, Section 1621. And Governor Newsom is therefore forced to stop giving illegal aliens benefits, as well as some of these other states.” “They already have a lot of tools at their disposal to fight the nonsense that's going on today. And the last thing we need sometimes is a new bill or a new law. Sometimes all we need to do is look, have someone look at what laws are on the books with a magnifying glass and to just tell them, look, here are the tools at your disposal. Here's what you can do about all this crap that's happening that's affecting the populace. Democrats are robbing the people, and here's what you can do about it”

Message to the GOP, stop proposing new bills to force Governors like Gavin Newsom to stop providing benefits to illegal migrants, it’s ALREADY ILLEGAL. We need our laws ENFORCED Title 8 Section 1621: It is ILLEGAL for aliens to claim federal, state and local benefits Title 8, Section 1621 of the United States Code (8 U.S.C. § 1621) is part of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA). It addresses the eligibility of aliens for certain federal, state, and local public benefits. Ineligibility for Certain Benefits: Unauthorized aliens (those not lawfully present in the U.S.) are generally not eligible for: Federal public benefits (e.g., welfare programs like TANF, Medicaid, SNAP). State or local public benefits (e.g., housing assistance, unemployment benefits, or other state-funded programs) This applies unless a state passes a law after August 22, 1996, explicitly allowing such benefits (The only exceptions to this are EMERGENCY situations, which is not what’s happening in Sanctuary Cities) “What really irritates me it's that Republicans in the Congress are trying to propose bills to try to get, you know, certain Democrat governors to stop certain programs and things that they're doing. But a lot of these bills that they're proposing are not the solution. We already have laws on the books that need to be enforced. For example, Governor Newsom is giving illegal immigrants health care benefits that is illegal under Title 8, Section 1621. But yet you have Republicans in Congress trying to propose bills to crack down on it, even though all they have to do is go to Donald Trump, go to the White House, tell him to enforce Title 8, Section 1621. And Governor Newsom is therefore forced to stop giving illegal aliens benefits, as well as some of these other states.” “They already have a lot of tools at their disposal to fight the nonsense that's going on today. And the last thing we need sometimes is a new bill or a new law. Sometimes all we need to do is look, have someone look at what laws are on the books with a magnifying glass and to just tell them, look, here are the tools at your disposal. Here's what you can do about all this crap that's happening that's affecting the populace. Democrats are robbing the people, and here's what you can do about it”

Wall Street Apes

37,130 views • 1 year ago

Someone projected their entire Obsidian vault into 3D and the shape revealed where they think and where they don't This is the work of Blake Crosley, "Topologies of Thought: Obsidian in Embedding Space," building on the three topologies Kat (Kat ⊷ the Poet Engineer ) first explored. Take 15,800 notes, turn each one into a point based on its meaning, and plot them in space. Notes about similar ideas land near each other, so the whole vault forms a shape, dense clusters where you think a lot, empty gaps where you don't. What it revealed: three tight hubs (AI, design, code) connected by thin bridges, plus a halo of orphan notes connecting to nothing. The gaps are the interesting part. A thin bridge between two clusters means you rarely think about those things together, that's a blind spot you couldn't see any other way. To do it yourself: run your notes through a free embedding model (Model2Vec's potion-base-8M, github repo /MinishLab/model2vec, runs local), then use UMAP to squash them into 3D and plot the points. You only need about 100 notes for the shape to show up, or just hand the whole pipeline to Claude Code. Your notes always knew the shape of your thinking. This just makes it visible. Bookmark this

Someone projected their entire Obsidian vault into 3D and the shape revealed where they think and where they don't This is the work of Blake Crosley, "Topologies of Thought: Obsidian in Embedding Space," building on the three topologies Kat (Kat ⊷ the Poet Engineer ) first explored. Take 15,800 notes, turn each one into a point based on its meaning, and plot them in space. Notes about similar ideas land near each other, so the whole vault forms a shape, dense clusters where you think a lot, empty gaps where you don't. What it revealed: three tight hubs (AI, design, code) connected by thin bridges, plus a halo of orphan notes connecting to nothing. The gaps are the interesting part. A thin bridge between two clusters means you rarely think about those things together, that's a blind spot you couldn't see any other way. To do it yourself: run your notes through a free embedding model (Model2Vec's potion-base-8M, github repo /MinishLab/model2vec, runs local), then use UMAP to squash them into 3D and plot the points. You only need about 100 notes for the shape to show up, or just hand the whole pipeline to Claude Code. Your notes always knew the shape of your thinking. This just makes it visible. Bookmark this

Yarchi

14,353 views • 3 months ago

You can never enlarge your penis. Yep. I have said it. There is no way that you can enlarge your manhood as a man. The only reason you think you have a small penis is because you are so used to watching porn. Now you are suffering from inferiority complex. The same way you cannot enlarge your hand, your fingers, your leg, or your head is the same way you cannot enlarge your manhood. You are so used to watching other men have sex. You are so used to watching other men's penises to a point where you now believe that yours is small. Okay. You want a big one. So what? The fact of the matter is this: No amount of penis can ever fill up a vagina. It just cannot. It is impossible. So what you are chasing here is a bottomless pit. You are going to die trying. What you need to do is simple. 1. Stop watching porn. 2. Go on semen retention. 3. Get your as in the gym. 4. Start lifting weights. 5. Start fasting. 6. Eat cleaner meals. 7. Go to bed early. 8. Repeat. Day in. Day out. These mindsets that people have these days are exhausting to listen to at times. Take it from me. You cannot do it.

Sensitive content

You can never enlarge your penis. Yep. I have said it. There is no way that you can enlarge your manhood as a man. The only reason you think you have a small penis is because you are so used to watching porn. Now you are suffering from inferiority complex. The same way you cannot enlarge your hand, your fingers, your leg, or your head is the same way you cannot enlarge your manhood. You are so used to watching other men have sex. You are so used to watching other men's penises to a point where you now believe that yours is small. Okay. You want a big one. So what? The fact of the matter is this: No amount of penis can ever fill up a vagina. It just cannot. It is impossible. So what you are chasing here is a bottomless pit. You are going to die trying. What you need to do is simple. 1. Stop watching porn. 2. Go on semen retention. 3. Get your as in the gym. 4. Start lifting weights. 5. Start fasting. 6. Eat cleaner meals. 7. Go to bed early. 8. Repeat. Day in. Day out. These mindsets that people have these days are exhausting to listen to at times. Take it from me. You cannot do it.

Franc: Day 1/30

53,427 views • 19 days ago

Occupation under international law has to be the occupation of another state's territory. There is no state that's being occupied—in this case by Israel—because the Palestinians have, on six different occasions, been offered a state of their own, and in each case have rejected the state. Every poll that's ever been conducted and every political settlement that's ever been broken—from 1936, 1947, and 1967 after Khartoum, to Oslo in 1993 and the offers in 2000 and 2008—show that the Palestinians do not want a second state. They want one state from the river to the sea, a fully Arab state with no Jews on it. This is the analogy I like to make: You go to the store and they tell you that a pair of jeans is a hundred bucks. And you say, "Okay, I'll, gonna pay a hundred bucks." Then a guy next to you in line comes, he returns a shirt that was worth 50 bucks. He wants to buy the same pair of jeans. How much does he have to pay? He only has to pay 50 bucks. He gave back a shirt that was worth 50 bucks. The pants were a hundred bucks, he only has to pay 50 bucks. Now, if you say to the store owner, "Hey, I don't want to give you anything of value, not the shirt, not the money, but now I want the jeans," no business person in the world would accept that claim. You can't say, "I take the jeans, I give you no money." That's not how business transactions work. It's not how the law of contracts work. But that's exactly what the claim of occupation does in this case. The Palestinians rejected the state that was offered to them, insist on calling themselves a state, and then claim that Israel is occupying their territory. But here's the problem: There is an international law test for the creation of legitimate nation states. There are over 7,000 ethnic groups in the world that archeologists and anthropologists and linguists have pieced together. The vast majority, over 98%, don't have a state of their own. So who gets to have a state? There are only 193 states in the world. These are nation states that meet these four elements from a conference in Montevideo in 1933. The four elements are: 1. Do you have a defined population? 2. Do you have defined borders? 3. Do you have a single effective government? 4. Do you have the capacity for conducting international relations? Israel has unquestionably met all four elements every single day since its founding. The supposed state of Palestine, which people now claim is more legitimate than the Jewish state, indisputably fails at least two of those four elements.

Occupation under international law has to be the occupation of another state's territory. There is no state that's being occupied—in this case by Israel—because the Palestinians have, on six different occasions, been offered a state of their own, and in each case have rejected the state. Every poll that's ever been conducted and every political settlement that's ever been broken—from 1936, 1947, and 1967 after Khartoum, to Oslo in 1993 and the offers in 2000 and 2008—show that the Palestinians do not want a second state. They want one state from the river to the sea, a fully Arab state with no Jews on it. This is the analogy I like to make: You go to the store and they tell you that a pair of jeans is a hundred bucks. And you say, "Okay, I'll, gonna pay a hundred bucks." Then a guy next to you in line comes, he returns a shirt that was worth 50 bucks. He wants to buy the same pair of jeans. How much does he have to pay? He only has to pay 50 bucks. He gave back a shirt that was worth 50 bucks. The pants were a hundred bucks, he only has to pay 50 bucks. Now, if you say to the store owner, "Hey, I don't want to give you anything of value, not the shirt, not the money, but now I want the jeans," no business person in the world would accept that claim. You can't say, "I take the jeans, I give you no money." That's not how business transactions work. It's not how the law of contracts work. But that's exactly what the claim of occupation does in this case. The Palestinians rejected the state that was offered to them, insist on calling themselves a state, and then claim that Israel is occupying their territory. But here's the problem: There is an international law test for the creation of legitimate nation states. There are over 7,000 ethnic groups in the world that archeologists and anthropologists and linguists have pieced together. The vast majority, over 98%, don't have a state of their own. So who gets to have a state? There are only 193 states in the world. These are nation states that meet these four elements from a conference in Montevideo in 1933. The four elements are: 1. Do you have a defined population? 2. Do you have defined borders? 3. Do you have a single effective government? 4. Do you have the capacity for conducting international relations? Israel has unquestionably met all four elements every single day since its founding. The supposed state of Palestine, which people now claim is more legitimate than the Jewish state, indisputably fails at least two of those four elements.

Roy K. Altman

183,351 views • 4 months ago

Anthropic just got outplayed again. Devs built the multiplayer assistant Anthropic couldn't, and open-sourced it. Claude Cowork is a solo desktop agent. You point it at a folder, give it a task, and it works through your local files on your own machine. The moment a teammate enters the picture, it has nothing to offer. Most real work does not happen alone. A teammate asks for a status update on something you own. The context they need is scattered across your meetings, your notes, and decisions made last week. Typing all of that out takes time you do not have. This is the gap Claude Cowork was never designed to cross. Rowboat Spaces is built on a different model entirely. Each person brings their own assistant into a shared channel. Your assistant is your second brain. It knows your meetings, your notes, and your open decisions. That personal context stays yours. When a teammate asks a question in the channel, you ask your assistant to brief them. It pulls from everything you know and delivers the answer on your behalf, attributed to you. Your teammate's assistant does the same, from their own context. Teams can draft specs, track decisions, and update shared files from plain conversation. Each assistant reads the full channel history, cross references it against what exists, and flags what is missing. The whole thing is open-source, and each assistant acts as the person it belongs to, not as a shared bot pulling from a common pool. The video below shows this in action. I joined a shared space and asked my team member for a status update. My team member asked their second brain to answer. A spec got built from that conversation, versioned, with every change tracked back to the message that triggered it. Rowboat GitHub: (don't forget to star 🌟) My co-founder also wrote a great article on building your second brain with Rowboat, and I highly recommend reading it as well. The article is quoted below.

Anthropic just got outplayed again. Devs built the multiplayer assistant Anthropic couldn't, and open-sourced it. Claude Cowork is a solo desktop agent. You point it at a folder, give it a task, and it works through your local files on your own machine. The moment a teammate enters the picture, it has nothing to offer. Most real work does not happen alone. A teammate asks for a status update on something you own. The context they need is scattered across your meetings, your notes, and decisions made last week. Typing all of that out takes time you do not have. This is the gap Claude Cowork was never designed to cross. Rowboat Spaces is built on a different model entirely. Each person brings their own assistant into a shared channel. Your assistant is your second brain. It knows your meetings, your notes, and your open decisions. That personal context stays yours. When a teammate asks a question in the channel, you ask your assistant to brief them. It pulls from everything you know and delivers the answer on your behalf, attributed to you. Your teammate's assistant does the same, from their own context. Teams can draft specs, track decisions, and update shared files from plain conversation. Each assistant reads the full channel history, cross references it against what exists, and flags what is missing. The whole thing is open-source, and each assistant acts as the person it belongs to, not as a shared bot pulling from a common pool. The video below shows this in action. I joined a shared space and asked my team member for a status update. My team member asked their second brain to answer. A spec got built from that conversation, versioned, with every change tracked back to the message that triggered it. Rowboat GitHub: (don't forget to star 🌟) My co-founder also wrote a great article on building your second brain with Rowboat, and I highly recommend reading it as well. The article is quoted below.

Akshay 🚀

117,616 views • 9 days ago

THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES. JUST THE ART OF WAR. This should literally reinforce everything Trump just posted but not they way most people are making it out to be. The answer is right in front of you. Read what Trump posted today, 7/12, again, very slowly, and then think about it. Think about what he is actually saying. Remember, layers, optics, and TIMING. How many coincidences before it becomes physically impossible? Why would the deep state leave the Epstein evidence sitting around for a new administration just to indict them? Maybe the deep state did "fake the files." Think deeper, think bigger. You just can't make this stuff up, people. Remember, everything is first viewed from a military strategic advantage perspective. Only logical power moves. The long game. On both sides. This is the most sophisticated psychological operation ever executed in order to take down the largest criminal enterprise that there has ever been. Some things will not make sense, and are meant to play on your emotions and you are not going to have all of the information. We didn't come this far for nothing. Have faith. Think bigger. Fall back and observe. Don't worry about the day to day noise. Focus on the objective. Godspeed.

THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES. JUST THE ART OF WAR. This should literally reinforce everything Trump just posted but not they way most people are making it out to be. The answer is right in front of you. Read what Trump posted today, 7/12, again, very slowly, and then think about it. Think about what he is actually saying. Remember, layers, optics, and TIMING. How many coincidences before it becomes physically impossible? Why would the deep state leave the Epstein evidence sitting around for a new administration just to indict them? Maybe the deep state did "fake the files." Think deeper, think bigger. You just can't make this stuff up, people. Remember, everything is first viewed from a military strategic advantage perspective. Only logical power moves. The long game. On both sides. This is the most sophisticated psychological operation ever executed in order to take down the largest criminal enterprise that there has ever been. Some things will not make sense, and are meant to play on your emotions and you are not going to have all of the information. We didn't come this far for nothing. Have faith. Think bigger. Fall back and observe. Don't worry about the day to day noise. Focus on the objective. Godspeed.

The SCIF

67,683 views • 1 year ago

This dude shuts down the DUI check point without answering a single question. We are in Northern Nevada and this bodycam from the rider captures a textbook interaction showing exactly how to assert your constitutional rights without turning a routine stop into an unnecessary escalation. While passing through a joint police and Nevada Highway Patrol (NHP) roadblock, a motorcycle rider was directed into a secondary inspection zone after refusing to answer questions at the first stop. When officers immediately opened with routine questioning about whether he had been drinking, the rider invoked his Fifth Amendment right by stating clearly and calmly: "I don't want to answer any questions." Key moments from the encounter highlight the tension between lawful authority and overreach: Coercive Threats: Frustrated by the rider's refusal to engage in casual conversation or answer incriminating questions, an officer attempted to force compliance by claiming, "I can detain you for an hour. Just answer yes or no." Distinguishing Requests from Orders: Throughout the stop, the rider repeatedly asked, "Are you ordering me?" when instructed to pull over and raise his helmet visor. When ordered by an NHP trooper to open the visor, he complied with the lawful command while maintaining his silence on all other questions. Handing Over Identification: When asked for ID, the rider clarified the legal status of the request: "Are you demanding I.D.?" Once the officer confirmed it was a formal demand, he promptly handed it over. The Legal Takeaway Under Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, law enforcement is permitted to set up brief, neutral DUI roadblocks. However, a checkpoint does not strip away your Fourth and Fifth Amendment protections: You are not obligated to answer questions. You do not have to answer where you are coming from, where you are going, or if you have been drinking. Clarify orders vs. requests. Always respectfully ask if an action is a request or an order. Compliant answer: obey direct orders, decline voluntary favors. Provide required documentation upon direct demand. Presenting your driver's license when lawfully ordered satisfies state requirements without waiving your right to remain silent. Hold officers accountable. Lacking reasonable suspicion or signs of impairment, the officers had no legal grounds to prolong the detention and returned his license. Before leaving, the rider requested business cards, names, and incident details on record. Refusing to consent to voluntary questioning is not non-cooperation—it is exercising the law. Stand your ground, stay calm, and know your rights. This is textbook how to handle this type of interaction.

This dude shuts down the DUI check point without answering a single question. We are in Northern Nevada and this bodycam from the rider captures a textbook interaction showing exactly how to assert your constitutional rights without turning a routine stop into an unnecessary escalation. While passing through a joint police and Nevada Highway Patrol (NHP) roadblock, a motorcycle rider was directed into a secondary inspection zone after refusing to answer questions at the first stop. When officers immediately opened with routine questioning about whether he had been drinking, the rider invoked his Fifth Amendment right by stating clearly and calmly: "I don't want to answer any questions." Key moments from the encounter highlight the tension between lawful authority and overreach: Coercive Threats: Frustrated by the rider's refusal to engage in casual conversation or answer incriminating questions, an officer attempted to force compliance by claiming, "I can detain you for an hour. Just answer yes or no." Distinguishing Requests from Orders: Throughout the stop, the rider repeatedly asked, "Are you ordering me?" when instructed to pull over and raise his helmet visor. When ordered by an NHP trooper to open the visor, he complied with the lawful command while maintaining his silence on all other questions. Handing Over Identification: When asked for ID, the rider clarified the legal status of the request: "Are you demanding I.D.?" Once the officer confirmed it was a formal demand, he promptly handed it over. The Legal Takeaway Under Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, law enforcement is permitted to set up brief, neutral DUI roadblocks. However, a checkpoint does not strip away your Fourth and Fifth Amendment protections: You are not obligated to answer questions. You do not have to answer where you are coming from, where you are going, or if you have been drinking. Clarify orders vs. requests. Always respectfully ask if an action is a request or an order. Compliant answer: obey direct orders, decline voluntary favors. Provide required documentation upon direct demand. Presenting your driver's license when lawfully ordered satisfies state requirements without waiving your right to remain silent. Hold officers accountable. Lacking reasonable suspicion or signs of impairment, the officers had no legal grounds to prolong the detention and returned his license. Before leaving, the rider requested business cards, names, and incident details on record. Refusing to consent to voluntary questioning is not non-cooperation—it is exercising the law. Stand your ground, stay calm, and know your rights. This is textbook how to handle this type of interaction.

Giggling Gannon

419,680 views • 1 month ago

In a country where “shall not be infringed” has been slowly rewritten into “shall not… unless you’re the right kind of citizen,” one company just drew a bright red line. A New Jersey teacher hits record. She’s not a lobbyist. Not a manufacturer. Just a mom and educator living under one of the most restrictive gun regimes in America. She looks into the camera and reads a press release out loud — word for word — from a company most people outside the 2A world barely know: CMMG. What she reads isn’t corporate PR. It’s a declaration of war on the two-tiered system that has quietly become normal. CMMG’s position, issued June 30 : “We do not have 2 classes of citizens in the country; we are ALL subject to the constitution. CMMG will only fulfill state and local government agencies and officers to the same configurations as they restrict to their own citizens. … If a state cannot trust us with equipment, we cannot and will not trust them. Our loyalty is to the People of this country and to the Constitution of the United States of America. We support law enforcement, but not at the expense of disarming and restricting our fellow citizens.” CMMG just set the standard. No special “LE only” guns, mags, or suppressors in states that ban them for law-abiding citizens. No two classes of Americans. Loyalty to the Constitution and the People first. Who else is ready to stand with them? Smith & Wesson Inc. SIG SAUER Daniel Defense Palmetto State Armory Springfield Armory® Ruger GLOCK, Inc. BERETTA USA Aero Precision Geissele Automatics Wilson Combat Henry Repeating Arms KelTec Heckler & Koch The two-tiered system ends when manufacturers refuse to feed it. Will you match CMMG’s position, or keep selling the “rules for thee but not for me” version? The People are watching 👁️👁️

In a country where “shall not be infringed” has been slowly rewritten into “shall not… unless you’re the right kind of citizen,” one company just drew a bright red line. A New Jersey teacher hits record. She’s not a lobbyist. Not a manufacturer. Just a mom and educator living under one of the most restrictive gun regimes in America. She looks into the camera and reads a press release out loud — word for word — from a company most people outside the 2A world barely know: CMMG. What she reads isn’t corporate PR. It’s a declaration of war on the two-tiered system that has quietly become normal. CMMG’s position, issued June 30 : “We do not have 2 classes of citizens in the country; we are ALL subject to the constitution. CMMG will only fulfill state and local government agencies and officers to the same configurations as they restrict to their own citizens. … If a state cannot trust us with equipment, we cannot and will not trust them. Our loyalty is to the People of this country and to the Constitution of the United States of America. We support law enforcement, but not at the expense of disarming and restricting our fellow citizens.” CMMG just set the standard. No special “LE only” guns, mags, or suppressors in states that ban them for law-abiding citizens. No two classes of Americans. Loyalty to the Constitution and the People first. Who else is ready to stand with them? Smith & Wesson Inc. SIG SAUER Daniel Defense Palmetto State Armory Springfield Armory® Ruger GLOCK, Inc. BERETTA USA Aero Precision Geissele Automatics Wilson Combat Henry Repeating Arms KelTec Heckler & Koch The two-tiered system ends when manufacturers refuse to feed it. Will you match CMMG’s position, or keep selling the “rules for thee but not for me” version? The People are watching 👁️👁️

ℳ𝒜𝒢𝒜_𝒳_𝒯𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝒟𝒶𝒾𝓁𝓎 𝒩𝑒𝓌𝓈🇺🇸

26,057 views • 1 month ago

Bam Adebayo GOES IN on the critics that says his 83 point game performance is unethical: "For the couch coaches, I mean, if you're in my shoes and you have, first of all, y'all are blaming me. You should be blaming the head coach. Get that first. I was not the one letting me go one-on-one the whole game until I had 70, and then you started to send a double. At that point, I got 70 with, like, what? nine minutes left to go in the game you think i'm not going for it like like and that's the thing that's crazy when they talk about the unethical part of the basketball i'm like if i have 70 points with 9 minutes to go Who would just be like, you know, coach, just take me out. Yeah, right. Anybody in my shoes with nine minutes left? Okay. A minute? All right. Nine? Yeah, I'm going for it. You can't be mad at that. If you are mad, I don't care because a lot of people, they're upset because if they did play, they never had a chance to get that close to chasing greatness. And then if you get that close to chasing greatness, that's the point of chasing it so you can surpass it. And some of the people have never played basketball. So like if you've been in the backyard and you and a couple of your homies have been playing 21 and you got 19. You're not going to get an easy look off. And four, they're going to talk about the free throws. It's not like I shoot 15 free throws a game. It's not like I average 10 free throws a game. You can watch the film. I was legitimately getting fouled every time. So I went to the free throw line."

Bam Adebayo GOES IN on the critics that says his 83 point game performance is unethical: "For the couch coaches, I mean, if you're in my shoes and you have, first of all, y'all are blaming me. You should be blaming the head coach. Get that first. I was not the one letting me go one-on-one the whole game until I had 70, and then you started to send a double. At that point, I got 70 with, like, what? nine minutes left to go in the game you think i'm not going for it like like and that's the thing that's crazy when they talk about the unethical part of the basketball i'm like if i have 70 points with 9 minutes to go Who would just be like, you know, coach, just take me out. Yeah, right. Anybody in my shoes with nine minutes left? Okay. A minute? All right. Nine? Yeah, I'm going for it. You can't be mad at that. If you are mad, I don't care because a lot of people, they're upset because if they did play, they never had a chance to get that close to chasing greatness. And then if you get that close to chasing greatness, that's the point of chasing it so you can surpass it. And some of the people have never played basketball. So like if you've been in the backyard and you and a couple of your homies have been playing 21 and you got 19. You're not going to get an easy look off. And four, they're going to talk about the free throws. It's not like I shoot 15 free throws a game. It's not like I average 10 free throws a game. You can watch the film. I was legitimately getting fouled every time. So I went to the free throw line."

Ahmed/The Ears/IG: BigBizTheGod 🇸🇴

374,056 views • 6 months ago

Sometimes those who are so used to being in power let something slip that reveals a lot not just about their attitudes but the truth of a situation. Edwina Curries throwaway line about providing brothels in/near the military camps for illegal immigrant men shows not just establishment disdain for women, sex workers and the lower classes, but it absolutely reveals the truth that these YOUNG MEN are sex starved, sexually active and keen to get their leg over. That then conclusively proves that if you dump many hundreds of them in towns like Piddington, Weathersfield, Crowborough etc then OF COURSE they are going to be a threat or a danger to local women and local girls. It’s an undeniable fact. Curries throwaway like has done us all a favour because it admits in record a fact we all knew. These men, who come from cultures where women are 2nd class citizens and not valued in any way WILL be focused on the female residents of those towns. That CANNOT be tolerated. If we are too weak and feeble to stop them getting here then lock them up 24/7 until we can deport every one of them.

Sometimes those who are so used to being in power let something slip that reveals a lot not just about their attitudes but the truth of a situation. Edwina Curries throwaway line about providing brothels in/near the military camps for illegal immigrant men shows not just establishment disdain for women, sex workers and the lower classes, but it absolutely reveals the truth that these YOUNG MEN are sex starved, sexually active and keen to get their leg over. That then conclusively proves that if you dump many hundreds of them in towns like Piddington, Weathersfield, Crowborough etc then OF COURSE they are going to be a threat or a danger to local women and local girls. It’s an undeniable fact. Curries throwaway like has done us all a favour because it admits in record a fact we all knew. These men, who come from cultures where women are 2nd class citizens and not valued in any way WILL be focused on the female residents of those towns. That CANNOT be tolerated. If we are too weak and feeble to stop them getting here then lock them up 24/7 until we can deport every one of them.

John Hannam

13,095 views • 1 month ago

🚨Governor DeSantis UNLOADS on the GOP and their mouthpieces for LOSING Jay Collins old Senate Seat in a +10 GOP district! Recognizes Republicans are voting DEMOCRAT to protest their policies! “When you run on one way and then you do things and take really bad votes, that's just something that I'm not going to sign up for. And so I was very clear from the beginning, I was not going to be involved in that. And that's just kind of the way the cookie crumbles. We as Republicans have shown how you win and win big. And it's substance driven, it's leadership driven, it's results driven. When you steer away from that and you play some of the games, you know, you're not going to have as good a result. That's just the reality. I look forward to helping folks that I have confidence are going to pursue the agenda that made us successful. And I'm happy to do it. But I was not involved in any way, shape or form in that. And that's just that was a decision that I made based on the available choices in that race. I looked at the looked at the data. Four years ago, I won that district overwhelmingly. But what you saw in that is you had a 10 point Republican turnout advantage in that district and still lost the race. So to me, that tells you not only you're not doing well with independents, REPUBLICANS are voting the other way! Registered Republicans! And whether that's out of protest, whether that's out of there, just maybe they're not as concerned. I don't know what goes on there, but I know if you have a 10 point advantage in your party registration, you should be able to win that election. I don't know that that was a difficult election to win. If you had the right formula and you've obviously seen us have success in that race in that in that particular district in the past. But, you know, that's just the way the way the cookie crumbles on some of this stuff.”

🚨Governor DeSantis UNLOADS on the GOP and their mouthpieces for LOSING Jay Collins old Senate Seat in a +10 GOP district! Recognizes Republicans are voting DEMOCRAT to protest their policies! “When you run on one way and then you do things and take really bad votes, that's just something that I'm not going to sign up for. And so I was very clear from the beginning, I was not going to be involved in that. And that's just kind of the way the cookie crumbles. We as Republicans have shown how you win and win big. And it's substance driven, it's leadership driven, it's results driven. When you steer away from that and you play some of the games, you know, you're not going to have as good a result. That's just the reality. I look forward to helping folks that I have confidence are going to pursue the agenda that made us successful. And I'm happy to do it. But I was not involved in any way, shape or form in that. And that's just that was a decision that I made based on the available choices in that race. I looked at the looked at the data. Four years ago, I won that district overwhelmingly. But what you saw in that is you had a 10 point Republican turnout advantage in that district and still lost the race. So to me, that tells you not only you're not doing well with independents, REPUBLICANS are voting the other way! Registered Republicans! And whether that's out of protest, whether that's out of there, just maybe they're not as concerned. I don't know what goes on there, but I know if you have a 10 point advantage in your party registration, you should be able to win that election. I don't know that that was a difficult election to win. If you had the right formula and you've obviously seen us have success in that race in that in that particular district in the past. But, you know, that's just the way the way the cookie crumbles on some of this stuff.”

Chris Nelson 🏝️🇺🇸

28,968 views • 5 months ago

Outstanding point from Vice President JD Vance addressing those claiming ICE is showing up at someone’s place of residence and those inside insist they haven’t heard of the person they’re looking for.... “Let's say, for example, we have a criminal migrant who is a sex offender, and let's say that we've got to go and arrest that person who, Democrat or Republican, wants a sex offender living in their community, I would assume — I would hope that most people don't. But because they're in illegal alien, we don't know their last address. We may have known their address three years ago, but we don't know their address now.” “What we'd like to do is talk to local officials and say, you know what? According to the Medicaid rules, where was the last person, this person — or where was the last address this person was domiciled? Or according to a SNAP application, a food stamps application? Maybe that could give us insight to where this person is today or maybe they had some local court trouble. We could go to the local courthouse, or even the local jail, and try to find where this criminal sex offender is today. The local authorities have been told do not cooperate. So, these guys are trying to go out and enforce the law. They're trying to arrest sex offenders, but they're trying to do it in an environment where local officials have been told do not help them, do not provide intelligence about where these sex offenders might be. This is disgraceful, and there are a lot of things that all of us could do better to lower the temperature. But the number one thing that I learned today is that the best way to facilitate reasonable enforcement of the law, but also to lower the chaos in Minneapolis, would be for state and local officials to cooperate.”

Outstanding point from Vice President JD Vance addressing those claiming ICE is showing up at someone’s place of residence and those inside insist they haven’t heard of the person they’re looking for.... “Let's say, for example, we have a criminal migrant who is a sex offender, and let's say that we've got to go and arrest that person who, Democrat or Republican, wants a sex offender living in their community, I would assume — I would hope that most people don't. But because they're in illegal alien, we don't know their last address. We may have known their address three years ago, but we don't know their address now.” “What we'd like to do is talk to local officials and say, you know what? According to the Medicaid rules, where was the last person, this person — or where was the last address this person was domiciled? Or according to a SNAP application, a food stamps application? Maybe that could give us insight to where this person is today or maybe they had some local court trouble. We could go to the local courthouse, or even the local jail, and try to find where this criminal sex offender is today. The local authorities have been told do not cooperate. So, these guys are trying to go out and enforce the law. They're trying to arrest sex offenders, but they're trying to do it in an environment where local officials have been told do not help them, do not provide intelligence about where these sex offenders might be. This is disgraceful, and there are a lot of things that all of us could do better to lower the temperature. But the number one thing that I learned today is that the best way to facilitate reasonable enforcement of the law, but also to lower the chaos in Minneapolis, would be for state and local officials to cooperate.”

Curtis Houck

30,929 views • 8 months ago