正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

She spins lies so effortlessly, like it’s second nature. Masterful, almost too good at it. The exaggerated tales of packing kids’ lunchboxes, school runs, and squeezing in meetings. It’s a performance screaming, “I’m a parent!” without saying it outright. Volunteering for hot lunch duty or chaperoning field trips. Come...

101,524 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Comments Section 的头像
Comments Section1 年前

Every school in California is probably wondering when exactly she showed up to volunteer for hot lunch or chaperone a field trip 😂

Fi 🌱🦖🚜 🦖🌱 的头像
Fi 🌱🦖🚜 🦖🌱1 年前

But notice, every time the interviewer attempts to veer off topic and have a laugh...Twerkle brings it all back to her, and her pre-rehearsed story... she very obviously doesn't do impromptu anything, including humour!

Gigi 🦅🇺🇲 的头像
Gigi 🦅🇺🇲1 年前

As Samantha said years ago "....lie upon lie upon lie"

The Winking Minx 的头像
The Winking Minx1 年前

😂😂😂😂😂 For a “woman” who expected to be paid for Royal duties, her “volunteering”, anywhere, for anyone, doing ANYTHING, for free, is literally not happening, that’s a real stretch 😂😂😂

Canellecitadelle 的头像
Canellecitadelle1 年前

The level of cringe😵‍💫 To truly see how cringe and fake Meg is, watch these two videos side by side without volume. 2 women having a natural and normal conversation vs 2 women overexaggerating and Cosplaying a "natural conversation" for PR purposes🫠 Look how natural Catherine's expression is; look how forced and exaggerated Meg's expressions are. Meg is truly a horrible actress and was never going to make it beyond cable TV🤷🏽‍♀️

NCBoy 的头像
NCBoy1 年前

The flashing eyes from left to right is the giveaway of a fantasist

Hazel mckinlay 的头像
Hazel mckinlay1 年前

She didn't know what a lunchbox was a few weeks ago.....

RF_Observer 的头像
RF_Observer1 年前

That's how you recognise lies - the amount of detail is given is always excessive.

COForestChick 🇺🇸 的头像
COForestChick 🇺🇸1 年前

Well, she is an ‘actress’ after all. Lots of rewrites and script changes. Zero research prior to substantiate what she says

Taylosh 的头像
Taylosh1 年前

Her anger at the Royal family is because they said no - they didn't do anything to her, she tried to do things to them and they said no merching, no freebies, no half in half out etc. Basically she, and her husband, have been having toddler type temper tantrums ever since.

相关视频

Here’s my analysis of why MEGHAN MARKLE LIES with such ease and how the Oprah interview exposed it. There are lies that come from panic. There are lies that come from confusion. Then there are lies that come from entitlement. The kind that slip out smoothly, confidently, without a flicker of worry, because the person saying them believes consequences are for other people. That is exactly what Meghan Markle displayed in the Oprah interview when she claimed she and Harry were married “three days before” their wedding, with the Archbishop of Canterbury. She didn’t frame it as a private vow or a romantic moment. She framed it as an actual marriage. And she did it on global television with a smile, like she was sharing a charming secret. But it wasn’t charming. It wasn’t harmless. And it certainly wasn’t true. It was a lie told with ease because she expected everyone else to absorb it without questioning it. The Lie Was Designed to Sound Like a Fairytale, Not a Fact This is how Meghan operates. She doesn’t just lie, she packages the lie. She wraps it in sentiment and sweetness so the audience reacts emotionally instead of logically. She didn’t say “We exchanged vows privately.” That would be plausible, normal, and not legally loaded. She said “We got married.” That choice of words matters. It changes everything. It turns a private moment into a legal and religious claim. It drags an institution into her story. And it creates pressure on other people to defend themselves. That is the real point. Meghan’s lies are never just personal. They are strategic. This Was Not a “Little Mistake” Because It Had Real Consequences Anyone trying to defend her will call it a misunderstanding. But a misunderstanding does not involve naming the Archbishop of Canterbury and implying a secret marriage happened before a globally televised wedding. Her statement instantly created two outcomes. 1) It cornered the Archbishop into cleaning up her mess By claiming he “married” them days earlier, Meghan effectively placed him in a position where silence would look like confirmation and denial would look like embarrassment. So he had to respond. That is the cruelty in it. It’s not just that she lied. It’s that she lied in a way that forced a senior religious figure to publicly correct her. She put a man of office into the role of damage control, because she wanted a romantic headline. That is not a “slip.” That is reckless and selfish. 2) It undermined the legitimacy of the official wedding Their actual wedding was not private. It was not hidden. It was a historical public event. So why tell the world the “real” marriage happened earlier? Because it reframes the real wedding into something performative, staged, and secondary. It whispers to the audience: That wasn’t for us, that was for them. It’s the same pattern every time. If the institution celebrates her, she uses it. If the institution limits her, she devalues it. Why She Lies With Ease: Because Her Lies Are Tools, Not Errors Meghan does not lie like someone afraid of being caught. She lies like someone who believes truth is flexible.

Queen Esther

110,252 次观看 • 6 个月前

Lie detector results are in, and yes — that too was a lie. 🙄 Meghan has an iPhone. She’s had more than a few over the years. And there is absolutely no way that Siri, as she claims, is “not on my phone at all.”🐂💩 Siri isn’t a fancy extra you can take or leave; it’s baked into iOS. You can silence it, restrict it, or kid yourself it’s gone, but it isn’t. Even “disabling” Siri doesn’t actually disable it. Anyone with an iPhone knows that. Apple’s own support pages are littered with people asking why they can’t delete Siri outright. The answer is the same every time: because you can’t. Then she insists she doesn’t have “location services on her phone.” Again, nonsense. Just like Siri, location services are part of the device. You can limit them, you can switch them off for certain apps, but you cannot remove them. They’re hard-wired into the thing. So, once again, Meghan overshares — this time gesturing at her iPhone while wittering on about how the confetti text effect could be her flower sprinkles. And then, in her latest interview, she tries to sound quaint and “old-fashioned” by claiming she doesn’t use AI. The result? She only proves the opposite: she can’t even manage a simple explanation without tripping over something demonstrably false. She’s forever demanding that others “tell the truth” about her, yet she can’t seem to manage it herself on the smallest of details — Siri and GPS included. Meghan says wearing pantyhose made her feel “inauthentic.” No, Meghan — the only thing inauthentic here is you. #MeghanMarkleIsALiar #MeghanMarkleIsTheProblem #MeghanMarkleIsInauthentic #iPhoneFacts #SiriIsAlwaysThere #StopLyingMeghan #TechTruth #Oversharing #AuthenticityCheck #TruthMatters #BloombergMarkled

HRH Lady J 👑

124,625 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨 SOMETHING STRANGE IS HAPPENING TO THE MOON — AND THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO NOTICE A woman gets on camera and says this isn’t a one-time thing. She saw it last month, the moon looked completely off, like the orientation made no sense, but she brushed it off and kept it moving. Now it’s happening again. Same exact look. So this time she actually checks, pulls up NASA charts for her exact location and shows what the moon is supposed to look like… and what she’s seeing doesn’t match it, not even close. The charts show it side to side, but what everyone actually saw was a flipped moon, straight up upside down, like something changed and everyone’s acting like it didn’t. Then she calls people across the country to verify it, and they come back saying the same thing. It looks upside down to them too, which is where this stops being “just her” and starts feeling like the same exact thing showing up in multiple places at the same time. And it’s not just her, people all over social media are saying the same thing: "Something isn't right." And this is where it stops making any sense. She says if the moon is a crescent, you’re only supposed to see the lit part… so why can she still see the entire outline of it, faint but clearly there, like the shadow isn’t even doing what it’s supposed to do? And she’s already calling it out before anyone can spin it: don’t say it’s lighting, don’t say it’s angle, don’t say it’s photoshopped, because she checked the charts, showed the receipts, and had other people confirm it. So now you’ve got the same “flip,” the same upside down moon, same visibility issue, second month in a row, multiple locations… and it still doesn’t match what we’re being shown. She ignored it once. Now it’s back again. So what exactly are we looking at… and why does it feel like we’re not supposed to question it?

HustleBitch

730,436 次观看 • 4 个月前