Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Shermichael Singleton, on the ICE shooting in Minneapolis: “ think for the viewing public who may not necessarily be used to seeing circumstances such as this, you do have a very, very split second, Abby, to make a very quick decision.” “It's not a methodical process. I'll give you... a prime example. They teach a lot of law enforcement officials, federal and local and state. If someone has a knfe and they're 20 feet away from you, where most people say, well, why would the officer shoot someone with a knfe in that distance is so great? They didn't have to shoot. They could have gotten away or used some other mechanism to subdue them. Well, a person can close a 20-foot gap in less than ten seconds.” “So the point that I'm trying to make by citing that example is to say I don't know, to your point, what that officer saw or felt. I don't know if he saw her moving her hands and believe maybe she was grabbing a g*n. I don't know. Which is why an investigation, a very thorough one, needs to proceed forward before anyone can really draw any conclusions about what that officer saw in that moment.”show more

RedWave Press

246,945 subscribers

52,905 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

CNN's Shermichael Singleton Singleton on the deadly ICE-involved shooting: "I own two firearms companies. I've done a lot of work with law enforcement at every level, particularly around firearms training, and, look, training does matter. I'm not going to negate that fact, but I think for the viewing public who may not necessarily be used to seeing circumstances such as this, you do have a very, very split second, Abby, to make a very quick decision. It's not a methodical process." "I'll give you a prime example. They teach a lot of law enforcement officials, federal and local and state: If someone has a knife and they're 20ft away from you, where most people say, well, why would the officer shoot someone with a knife? And that distance is so great? They didn't they didn't have to shoot. They could have gotten away or used some other mechanism to subdue them. Well, a person can close a 20 foot gap in less than 10 seconds. And so, the point that I'm trying to make by citing that example is to say, I don't know to your point, what that officer saw or felt. I don't know if he saw her moving her hands and believe maybe she was grabbing a gun. I don't know, which is why an investigation, a very thorough one, needs to proceed forward before anyone can really draw any conclusions about what that officer saw in that moment."

CNN's Shermichael Singleton Singleton on the deadly ICE-involved shooting: "I own two firearms companies. I've done a lot of work with law enforcement at every level, particularly around firearms training, and, look, training does matter. I'm not going to negate that fact, but I think for the viewing public who may not necessarily be used to seeing circumstances such as this, you do have a very, very split second, Abby, to make a very quick decision. It's not a methodical process." "I'll give you a prime example. They teach a lot of law enforcement officials, federal and local and state: If someone has a knife and they're 20ft away from you, where most people say, well, why would the officer shoot someone with a knife? And that distance is so great? They didn't they didn't have to shoot. They could have gotten away or used some other mechanism to subdue them. Well, a person can close a 20 foot gap in less than 10 seconds. And so, the point that I'm trying to make by citing that example is to say, I don't know to your point, what that officer saw or felt. I don't know if he saw her moving her hands and believe maybe she was grabbing a gun. I don't know, which is why an investigation, a very thorough one, needs to proceed forward before anyone can really draw any conclusions about what that officer saw in that moment."

Curtis Houck

944,685 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

I don't know why I'm so amazed to see a complete stranger dance like that I saw her online. She really made the most of her moment. If they don't hire her after this performance, I don't know what to say. By the way, does anyone know who she is?

I don't know why I'm so amazed to see a complete stranger dance like that I saw her online. She really made the most of her moment. If they don't hire her after this performance, I don't know what to say. By the way, does anyone know who she is?

Fun Viral Vids 😊

110,795 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Chris Haynes on Giannis future with the Bucks and believes he could be moved at some point: "When the losses keep compiling, Giannis is going to have to keep fielding these questions. Thats why its getting to a point he is tired of hearing it. The Bucks have to make a decision. Do you waste a players talent when you know what that player desire is and what you promised him? I don't think this will go away anytime soon. I think he could be moved at some point. Which point? That i don't know. This team is not good. They have to make a miraculous turn around."

Chris Haynes on Giannis future with the Bucks and believes he could be moved at some point: "When the losses keep compiling, Giannis is going to have to keep fielding these questions. Thats why its getting to a point he is tired of hearing it. The Bucks have to make a decision. Do you waste a players talent when you know what that player desire is and what you promised him? I don't think this will go away anytime soon. I think he could be moved at some point. Which point? That i don't know. This team is not good. They have to make a miraculous turn around."

Heat Central

50,132 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

#WATCH | US President Donald Trump says, "They (Iran) are begging to make a deal, not me. They're begging to make a deal, and anybody who saw what was happening over there would understand why they want to make a deal. But they say, we're not talking to them... They're not fools. They're very smart, in a certain way. I say they're lousy fighters, but they're great negotiators. They are begging to work out a deal. I don't know if we'll be able to do that. I don't know if we're willing to do that. They should have done that four weeks ago. They should have done it two years ago. Or they should have done it when we first came into office..." (Source: The White House)

#WATCH | US President Donald Trump says, "They (Iran) are begging to make a deal, not me. They're begging to make a deal, and anybody who saw what was happening over there would understand why they want to make a deal. But they say, we're not talking to them... They're not fools. They're very smart, in a certain way. I say they're lousy fighters, but they're great negotiators. They are begging to work out a deal. I don't know if we'll be able to do that. I don't know if we're willing to do that. They should have done that four weeks ago. They should have done it two years ago. Or they should have done it when we first came into office..." (Source: The White House)

ANI

100,915 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

[Q]: Mr. President, how concerned are you that by describing Europe as lost, you may actually alienate Europeans and make them less willing to help you in the future? [President Zelenskyy]: About Europe - there are very strong leaders, and they know what to do. They have to be - they have to rush. For example, I can tell you very, very honestly - we spoke about it - that in 2040 Russia will have an army of 2, 2.5 million people. They will have it. We will have a ceasefire, or we will not have a ceasefire. It will be a pause in this war, or, God bless, it will be the end of this war with really strong security guarantees. But we don't know if Russia will come back. What they need, what their goals are - nobody knows. So my suggestion - and I think about our families and our children - my suggestion to Europe is that Russia will want to try who is strong in Europe.

[Q]: Mr. President, how concerned are you that by describing Europe as lost, you may actually alienate Europeans and make them less willing to help you in the future? [President Zelenskyy]: About Europe - there are very strong leaders, and they know what to do. They have to be - they have to rush. For example, I can tell you very, very honestly - we spoke about it - that in 2040 Russia will have an army of 2, 2.5 million people. They will have it. We will have a ceasefire, or we will not have a ceasefire. It will be a pause in this war, or, God bless, it will be the end of this war with really strong security guarantees. But we don't know if Russia will come back. What they need, what their goals are - nobody knows. So my suggestion - and I think about our families and our children - my suggestion to Europe is that Russia will want to try who is strong in Europe.

Anton Gerashchenko

280,361 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump: If they don't make a deal, then I go back and I finish the job. But that's going to take them forever to rebuild. “I could take out most of their bridges in less than an hour. Less than an hour. But, you know, it takes them 10 years to build a bridge. Bridges take the longest, and power plants are second. I can knock out the power plants. Within one day, all of their power plants would be gone. You know, I think about 91 million people without power, without bridges, would have to live. And it's a very, very delicate balance. So I think we have a very strong position right now. They know I'm going to do that if they don't make a deal.”

JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump: If they don't make a deal, then I go back and I finish the job. But that's going to take them forever to rebuild. “I could take out most of their bridges in less than an hour. Less than an hour. But, you know, it takes them 10 years to build a bridge. Bridges take the longest, and power plants are second. I can knock out the power plants. Within one day, all of their power plants would be gone. You know, I think about 91 million people without power, without bridges, would have to live. And it's a very, very delicate balance. So I think we have a very strong position right now. They know I'm going to do that if they don't make a deal.”

Megatron

153,448 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Lue Elizondo theorizes why Amy Eskridge may have been targeted and murdered “I will say in defense of that type of behavior, a lot of times if you're very vocal, the one thing secrecy hates is someone who's vocal. There's an old saying ‘how do you keep a secret between two people? Well, one of them has to die.’ So if you have very sensitive research you're doing, what you don't want to do is necessarily reach out to somebody who can't be controlled. Or for whatever reason um may be willing to violate a security oath. If Amy is getting on YouTube and doing personal videos about her work, maybe that made some people nervous enough where they said ‘look, you know, this is somebody who maybe can't be controlled, somebody who is going to stray off the reservation or stray from being on script’. Now, with that said, let me be very clear here, I'm not on any type of script.”

Lue Elizondo theorizes why Amy Eskridge may have been targeted and murdered “I will say in defense of that type of behavior, a lot of times if you're very vocal, the one thing secrecy hates is someone who's vocal. There's an old saying ‘how do you keep a secret between two people? Well, one of them has to die.’ So if you have very sensitive research you're doing, what you don't want to do is necessarily reach out to somebody who can't be controlled. Or for whatever reason um may be willing to violate a security oath. If Amy is getting on YouTube and doing personal videos about her work, maybe that made some people nervous enough where they said ‘look, you know, this is somebody who maybe can't be controlled, somebody who is going to stray off the reservation or stray from being on script’. Now, with that said, let me be very clear here, I'm not on any type of script.”

Red Panda Koala

19,187 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Q: How was your phone call with prime minister Andy Burnham last week? Did he talk about the Falkland islands and Argentina? Trump: Well, the falkland islands is very interesting because here we go again. I remember as a young boy, pretty young boy anyway. But the falkland islands and, uh, I think it was a different country at that time, the uk a little bit, but they went in and they took it over. I'm not sure if they're doing that. They have a little problem with immigration. They have a little problem with energy and they have some other problems they have to take care of. So I don't know, you know, I don't know if they're going to be willing to travel that far. That is very far away. You're talking about weeks by boat.

Q: How was your phone call with prime minister Andy Burnham last week? Did he talk about the Falkland islands and Argentina? Trump: Well, the falkland islands is very interesting because here we go again. I remember as a young boy, pretty young boy anyway. But the falkland islands and, uh, I think it was a different country at that time, the uk a little bit, but they went in and they took it over. I'm not sure if they're doing that. They have a little problem with immigration. They have a little problem with energy and they have some other problems they have to take care of. So I don't know, you know, I don't know if they're going to be willing to travel that far. That is very far away. You're talking about weeks by boat.

Acyn

833,781 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

Warren Buffett: "If your stock goes down 10% and that upsets you, it obviously means that you think the market knows more about the company than you do, and in that case you're the patsy." This is a 1988 Buffett telling you how to know if you're the sucker at the table. His words: "People would much rather be promised that they're going to win a lottery ticket next week than that they're going to get rich slowly." "Gus Levy used to say that he was long-term greedy, not short-term greedy. And if you're short-term greedy, you probably won't get a very good long-term result." "You name ten high tech companies to me and ask me where they're going to be in ten years or ten months and I don't have the faintest idea, so that would be exactly like buying cocoa beans." "If the stock exchange closes on Saturday and Sunday, I don't break out in hives, so if it goes for a couple of years and the business does well, we'll do very well." "Being a sound investor really just requires a certain control of your temperament and the ability to know what you know and know what you don't know and occasionally act." Bookmark & watch today ↓

Warren Buffett: "If your stock goes down 10% and that upsets you, it obviously means that you think the market knows more about the company than you do, and in that case you're the patsy." This is a 1988 Buffett telling you how to know if you're the sucker at the table. His words: "People would much rather be promised that they're going to win a lottery ticket next week than that they're going to get rich slowly." "Gus Levy used to say that he was long-term greedy, not short-term greedy. And if you're short-term greedy, you probably won't get a very good long-term result." "You name ten high tech companies to me and ask me where they're going to be in ten years or ten months and I don't have the faintest idea, so that would be exactly like buying cocoa beans." "If the stock exchange closes on Saturday and Sunday, I don't break out in hives, so if it goes for a couple of years and the business does well, we'll do very well." "Being a sound investor really just requires a certain control of your temperament and the ability to know what you know and know what you don't know and occasionally act." Bookmark & watch today ↓

Fireside Tapes

16,596 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

ELON: IF THERE’S NO FILTER TO IMMIGRATION, HOW DO YOU KNOW WHO’S COMING IN? "I'm very much in favor of legal immigration. I think that generally, I think one should welcome to a country anyone who is willing to work hard, is honest, has high integrity and will add to any given country. If somebody is an asset to the country, why not have them join? That's obviously a great thing to do. I think that's great. But if it's illegal immigration and there's no filter, how do you know who's coming in? You don't know. So, you have to have some basis for saying somebody should come in or not come in. And my argument is, it should be a very simple basis. Will they add to the country? Will they be a productive part of the economy? Do they admire the culture? Do they want to join because of the culture? Then, that's great. But if there's no process for that, then you don't know. And I want to be careful because my words will be misconstrued. I'm not saying all illegal immigrants are bad. Perhaps most of them are good. But if there's no process for reviewing, not at all, then how can you say that everyone who is an illegal immigrant is going to be honest and hard-working? You can't say that because you simply don't know." Source: Interview in Rome, Italy, December 2023

ELON: IF THERE’S NO FILTER TO IMMIGRATION, HOW DO YOU KNOW WHO’S COMING IN? "I'm very much in favor of legal immigration. I think that generally, I think one should welcome to a country anyone who is willing to work hard, is honest, has high integrity and will add to any given country. If somebody is an asset to the country, why not have them join? That's obviously a great thing to do. I think that's great. But if it's illegal immigration and there's no filter, how do you know who's coming in? You don't know. So, you have to have some basis for saying somebody should come in or not come in. And my argument is, it should be a very simple basis. Will they add to the country? Will they be a productive part of the economy? Do they admire the culture? Do they want to join because of the culture? Then, that's great. But if there's no process for that, then you don't know. And I want to be careful because my words will be misconstrued. I'm not saying all illegal immigrants are bad. Perhaps most of them are good. But if there's no process for reviewing, not at all, then how can you say that everyone who is an illegal immigrant is going to be honest and hard-working? You can't say that because you simply don't know." Source: Interview in Rome, Italy, December 2023

Mario Nawfal

74,805 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

AFP’s Danny Kemp: “Mr. Vice President, you presumably watched the video yourself. There’s not the slightest doubt in your mind, having viewed it, that this the victim — you still believe that she deliberately tried to ram him despite despite seeing this video?” Vice President JD Vance JD Vance: “Look, I don’t know what it’s in a person’s heart or in a person’s head. And obviously, we’re not going to get the chance to ask this woman what was going on. What I am certain of is that she violated the law. What I am certain of is that that officer had every reason to think that he was under very serious threat for injury, or in fact, his life. What is I’m certain of that she accelerated in a way where she ran into the guy. I don’t know what was in her heart and what was in her head, but I know that she violated the law, and I know that officer was acting in self-defense. That’s raises an interesting point, though. Look, if people want to say that we should have a legitimate debate about, you know, what was she really doing, right? Was she panicking when she drove into this officer, or was she actually trying to ram him? That’s a — that’s a reasonable conversation. What’s not reasonable is for so many of you to plaster all over the media that this was an innocent woman and that the ICE agent committed murder, which is what many of you have said explicitly, and some of you have said implicitly. That’s what I have an objection to. The idea that this was not justified is absurd and I think everybody knows it in their heart.”

AFP’s Danny Kemp: “Mr. Vice President, you presumably watched the video yourself. There’s not the slightest doubt in your mind, having viewed it, that this the victim — you still believe that she deliberately tried to ram him despite despite seeing this video?” Vice President JD Vance JD Vance: “Look, I don’t know what it’s in a person’s heart or in a person’s head. And obviously, we’re not going to get the chance to ask this woman what was going on. What I am certain of is that she violated the law. What I am certain of is that that officer had every reason to think that he was under very serious threat for injury, or in fact, his life. What is I’m certain of that she accelerated in a way where she ran into the guy. I don’t know what was in her heart and what was in her head, but I know that she violated the law, and I know that officer was acting in self-defense. That’s raises an interesting point, though. Look, if people want to say that we should have a legitimate debate about, you know, what was she really doing, right? Was she panicking when she drove into this officer, or was she actually trying to ram him? That’s a — that’s a reasonable conversation. What’s not reasonable is for so many of you to plaster all over the media that this was an innocent woman and that the ICE agent committed murder, which is what many of you have said explicitly, and some of you have said implicitly. That’s what I have an objection to. The idea that this was not justified is absurd and I think everybody knows it in their heart.”

Curtis Houck

19,488 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen just told President Trump his leadership in space exploration is truly extraordinary. Trump replied that he spoke to Wayne Gretzky — and The Great One is very proud of him. HANSEN: “While I have the microphone, sir, I just want to thank you on behalf of Canada.” “The space leadership you spoke of from America is truly is extraordinary.” “I’ve said this many times before, a nation that leads like that and creates and sets big goals for humanity, that brings other countries along with it is truly incredible.” “And I know that’s a very intentional, not a necessary decision, intentional decision to lead by example and to allow other countries like Canada to share our gifts and help you achieve these mutually beneficial goals, like establishing a presence on the moon and eventually going to Mars.” “And Canadians are so proud to be a part of this program.” TRUMP: “Well, I have to say, I spoke to a very special person, Wayne Gretzky, who I think, you know, The Great One, and I spoke to your prime minister and many other friends I have in Canada.” “They are so proud of you.” “And you have a lot of courage. I’m not sure if they’d want to do that. I’m not even sure if The Great One would want to do that, to be honest with you.”

Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen just told President Trump his leadership in space exploration is truly extraordinary. Trump replied that he spoke to Wayne Gretzky — and The Great One is very proud of him. HANSEN: “While I have the microphone, sir, I just want to thank you on behalf of Canada.” “The space leadership you spoke of from America is truly is extraordinary.” “I’ve said this many times before, a nation that leads like that and creates and sets big goals for humanity, that brings other countries along with it is truly incredible.” “And I know that’s a very intentional, not a necessary decision, intentional decision to lead by example and to allow other countries like Canada to share our gifts and help you achieve these mutually beneficial goals, like establishing a presence on the moon and eventually going to Mars.” “And Canadians are so proud to be a part of this program.” TRUMP: “Well, I have to say, I spoke to a very special person, Wayne Gretzky, who I think, you know, The Great One, and I spoke to your prime minister and many other friends I have in Canada.” “They are so proud of you.” “And you have a lot of courage. I’m not sure if they’d want to do that. I’m not even sure if The Great One would want to do that, to be honest with you.”

Overton

71,943 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Reporter: Is the United States supporting a potential Israeli invasion of Lebanon? Trump: I was with a person whose parents live in Lebanon. This is a very substantial person, wealthy person whose parents live in Lebanon. And I said, really? How? Over the years, they gotten use to the fact that it’s being bombed. And they get used to it, I guess. I don't know, people live in Ukraine, you would think that they would not live in Ukraine, but they live in Ukraine. I don't know that I would do that.

Reporter: Is the United States supporting a potential Israeli invasion of Lebanon? Trump: I was with a person whose parents live in Lebanon. This is a very substantial person, wealthy person whose parents live in Lebanon. And I said, really? How? Over the years, they gotten use to the fact that it’s being bombed. And they get used to it, I guess. I don't know, people live in Ukraine, you would think that they would not live in Ukraine, but they live in Ukraine. I don't know that I would do that.

Acyn

1,039,266 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Outstanding point from Vice President JD Vance addressing those claiming ICE is showing up at someone’s place of residence and those inside insist they haven’t heard of the person they’re looking for.... “Let's say, for example, we have a criminal migrant who is a sex offender, and let's say that we've got to go and arrest that person who, Democrat or Republican, wants a sex offender living in their community, I would assume — I would hope that most people don't. But because they're in illegal alien, we don't know their last address. We may have known their address three years ago, but we don't know their address now.” “What we'd like to do is talk to local officials and say, you know what? According to the Medicaid rules, where was the last person, this person — or where was the last address this person was domiciled? Or according to a SNAP application, a food stamps application? Maybe that could give us insight to where this person is today or maybe they had some local court trouble. We could go to the local courthouse, or even the local jail, and try to find where this criminal sex offender is today. The local authorities have been told do not cooperate. So, these guys are trying to go out and enforce the law. They're trying to arrest sex offenders, but they're trying to do it in an environment where local officials have been told do not help them, do not provide intelligence about where these sex offenders might be. This is disgraceful, and there are a lot of things that all of us could do better to lower the temperature. But the number one thing that I learned today is that the best way to facilitate reasonable enforcement of the law, but also to lower the chaos in Minneapolis, would be for state and local officials to cooperate.”

Outstanding point from Vice President JD Vance addressing those claiming ICE is showing up at someone’s place of residence and those inside insist they haven’t heard of the person they’re looking for.... “Let's say, for example, we have a criminal migrant who is a sex offender, and let's say that we've got to go and arrest that person who, Democrat or Republican, wants a sex offender living in their community, I would assume — I would hope that most people don't. But because they're in illegal alien, we don't know their last address. We may have known their address three years ago, but we don't know their address now.” “What we'd like to do is talk to local officials and say, you know what? According to the Medicaid rules, where was the last person, this person — or where was the last address this person was domiciled? Or according to a SNAP application, a food stamps application? Maybe that could give us insight to where this person is today or maybe they had some local court trouble. We could go to the local courthouse, or even the local jail, and try to find where this criminal sex offender is today. The local authorities have been told do not cooperate. So, these guys are trying to go out and enforce the law. They're trying to arrest sex offenders, but they're trying to do it in an environment where local officials have been told do not help them, do not provide intelligence about where these sex offenders might be. This is disgraceful, and there are a lot of things that all of us could do better to lower the temperature. But the number one thing that I learned today is that the best way to facilitate reasonable enforcement of the law, but also to lower the chaos in Minneapolis, would be for state and local officials to cooperate.”

Curtis Houck

30,929 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

"I think humanity, to some level, is a resource for them." ~Matthew Brown "I think there is a very small group (of humans) that does have a good degree of fidelity on intention (of the non-humans)." ~Brown "If it's true that there has been genetic interventions on humanity at certain points in our evolution, well, I very much wanna know what is the intent behind those interventions. What is being, you know, added, removed, suppressed, or enhanced in humanity, and for what reasons?" ~Brown (Brown said this to George Knapp and Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell in May on "Weaponized." ⬇️) "I think I have a good degree of confidence that the reason they're here is us. I think life, especially sentient life, it's a precious thing. And I think, to some, it might be a resource. I think humanity, to some level, is a resource for them." ~Brown ~From Today's Event ⬇️⬇️⬇️~ Matthew Brown - Matthew: "In the short term, and in my immediate environment, I'm more concerned about humans. But yeah, to get to that next part, I think longer term, you know, I definitely am more concerned about the NHI intentions. You know that's a really broad bucket so, you know, more...you narrow it down to specific groups of them. "It seems at least some of them have been present on Earth for a very long time, but they do not maintain an open relationship with humanity, except for very-discreet encounters with leadership and humans through the sort of abduction or experiencer modalities." (I'm gonna assume that "encounters with leadership" is referring to the alleged Holloman landing.) Brown: "And those certainly, you know, while some people claim to have very positive interactions, there's a very large amount that that have the opposite, especially women, who seem to, unfortunately, you know, get the worst of it, and over a very long period of time. So, I'm very concerned about that. "If it's true that there has been genetic interventions on humanity at certain points in our evolution, well, I very much wanna know what is the intent behind those interventions. What is being, you know, added, removed, suppressed, or enhanced in humanity, and for what reasons?" (That's important: Added, removed, suppressed or enhanced. If any of that is true, this goes way beyond, "Well, they haven't blown us up so they must not have bad intentions.") Brown: "You know, I don't have answers, but that's where, you know, you know, this is a journey of discovery, right? And that's kind of where I am at, is again, what are the long term intentions of the NHI present on Earth toward towards humanity?" Leslie Kean: "Do you think there are government officials that know a lot on the classified level and beyond, that have an idea about the intention that they're just not sharing with with anyone? Or, do you think everyone is baffled by that?" Brown: "I think there is a very small group that does have a good degree of fidelity on intention, both in the U.S. government and in, you know, probably the major governments around the world. You know, I have some reason to believe that's true, as well as analysis, so it's a mix of, you know, what we would call evidence and thought. That's where I'm at." Kean: "And just to reiterate, you don't have any idea of what they may have discovered about the intention or any thoughts about what that might be? Is that correct?" Brown: "None that I would say publicly yet. You know, I want to have some degree of certainty before I share something you know serious as that." Kean: "Can you say if you think it might be sort of something that might be quote 'negative' for humanity as we go forward, or something that might be evolutionarily positive for us as a species? You have any sense of that? Of, you know, whether it's a positive or negative kind of intention? Or maybe a mixed one, depending on who we're dealing with. I don't know if you can just can say any more about that." Brown: "it's probably mixed because there seems to be at least more groups involved than just one. So, you know, it's like saying all of humanity's bad news just because you only encountered the worst aspects of humanity. You can't fall into that trap. Yeah, I'd need more data before I would feel comfortable, you know, saying it's definitely this or that." Kean: "Thank you. Yeah, I think that's the big question in everyone's mind, so many people's minds, is the intention. And so far, Jeff (Jeff Nuccetelli) says we're all here. We're still here, except for there are the individuals that have had the frightening encounters. But, you know, nothing on a mass scale has happened to harm us. So, here we are." (Harm can come in many forms. They may not have attacked us with bombs or missiles but, as Brown asked: Have they added, removed, suppressed, or enhanced anything, genetically, or otherwise, from humans? Peter Levenda has written and spoken about this on numerous occasions. Have they done anything to us that's related to consciousness? As far as if there's anybody who knows a lot more about the phenomenon (could be more than one intelligence) and its intentions than we do? I have shared my opinion on that question a few times. IMO, yes. But that's not based on any hard evidence. Does Brown have evidence on that front? Here's something that suggests someone, somewhere, knows more...) Hvbears88: "Interestingly, [Grusch] also mentioned how many people know the full scope of the phenomenon to be no more than 50 people. But it wasn't clear whether this meant 50 people currently alive or 50 people ever in history." (Have these folks read "The Document?") Retired Naval Commander Will Miller: "Through a former NSA contact of mine, I had the chance to meet with a high-level, retired, National Security Agency, senior civilian. And this gentleman, we talked about the subject of UFOs and, again, whether any government agency either had information on the subject or had interest in. And he revealed one tidbit of information I found very interesting. "He said within NSA, there was a document known only as “the document” and it was on the subject of UFOs and extraterrestrial intelligence. And it was so highly classified that only the Director himself and perhaps one or two other people were actually able to view it. Its existence was widely known, but again, very, very close hold information." Source:

"I think humanity, to some level, is a resource for them." ~Matthew Brown "I think there is a very small group (of humans) that does have a good degree of fidelity on intention (of the non-humans)." ~Brown "If it's true that there has been genetic interventions on humanity at certain points in our evolution, well, I very much wanna know what is the intent behind those interventions. What is being, you know, added, removed, suppressed, or enhanced in humanity, and for what reasons?" ~Brown (Brown said this to George Knapp and Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell in May on "Weaponized." ⬇️) "I think I have a good degree of confidence that the reason they're here is us. I think life, especially sentient life, it's a precious thing. And I think, to some, it might be a resource. I think humanity, to some level, is a resource for them." ~Brown ~From Today's Event ⬇️⬇️⬇️~ Matthew Brown - Matthew: "In the short term, and in my immediate environment, I'm more concerned about humans. But yeah, to get to that next part, I think longer term, you know, I definitely am more concerned about the NHI intentions. You know that's a really broad bucket so, you know, more...you narrow it down to specific groups of them. "It seems at least some of them have been present on Earth for a very long time, but they do not maintain an open relationship with humanity, except for very-discreet encounters with leadership and humans through the sort of abduction or experiencer modalities." (I'm gonna assume that "encounters with leadership" is referring to the alleged Holloman landing.) Brown: "And those certainly, you know, while some people claim to have very positive interactions, there's a very large amount that that have the opposite, especially women, who seem to, unfortunately, you know, get the worst of it, and over a very long period of time. So, I'm very concerned about that. "If it's true that there has been genetic interventions on humanity at certain points in our evolution, well, I very much wanna know what is the intent behind those interventions. What is being, you know, added, removed, suppressed, or enhanced in humanity, and for what reasons?" (That's important: Added, removed, suppressed or enhanced. If any of that is true, this goes way beyond, "Well, they haven't blown us up so they must not have bad intentions.") Brown: "You know, I don't have answers, but that's where, you know, you know, this is a journey of discovery, right? And that's kind of where I am at, is again, what are the long term intentions of the NHI present on Earth toward towards humanity?" Leslie Kean: "Do you think there are government officials that know a lot on the classified level and beyond, that have an idea about the intention that they're just not sharing with with anyone? Or, do you think everyone is baffled by that?" Brown: "I think there is a very small group that does have a good degree of fidelity on intention, both in the U.S. government and in, you know, probably the major governments around the world. You know, I have some reason to believe that's true, as well as analysis, so it's a mix of, you know, what we would call evidence and thought. That's where I'm at." Kean: "And just to reiterate, you don't have any idea of what they may have discovered about the intention or any thoughts about what that might be? Is that correct?" Brown: "None that I would say publicly yet. You know, I want to have some degree of certainty before I share something you know serious as that." Kean: "Can you say if you think it might be sort of something that might be quote 'negative' for humanity as we go forward, or something that might be evolutionarily positive for us as a species? You have any sense of that? Of, you know, whether it's a positive or negative kind of intention? Or maybe a mixed one, depending on who we're dealing with. I don't know if you can just can say any more about that." Brown: "it's probably mixed because there seems to be at least more groups involved than just one. So, you know, it's like saying all of humanity's bad news just because you only encountered the worst aspects of humanity. You can't fall into that trap. Yeah, I'd need more data before I would feel comfortable, you know, saying it's definitely this or that." Kean: "Thank you. Yeah, I think that's the big question in everyone's mind, so many people's minds, is the intention. And so far, Jeff (Jeff Nuccetelli) says we're all here. We're still here, except for there are the individuals that have had the frightening encounters. But, you know, nothing on a mass scale has happened to harm us. So, here we are." (Harm can come in many forms. They may not have attacked us with bombs or missiles but, as Brown asked: Have they added, removed, suppressed, or enhanced anything, genetically, or otherwise, from humans? Peter Levenda has written and spoken about this on numerous occasions. Have they done anything to us that's related to consciousness? As far as if there's anybody who knows a lot more about the phenomenon (could be more than one intelligence) and its intentions than we do? I have shared my opinion on that question a few times. IMO, yes. But that's not based on any hard evidence. Does Brown have evidence on that front? Here's something that suggests someone, somewhere, knows more...) Hvbears88: "Interestingly, [Grusch] also mentioned how many people know the full scope of the phenomenon to be no more than 50 people. But it wasn't clear whether this meant 50 people currently alive or 50 people ever in history." (Have these folks read "The Document?") Retired Naval Commander Will Miller: "Through a former NSA contact of mine, I had the chance to meet with a high-level, retired, National Security Agency, senior civilian. And this gentleman, we talked about the subject of UFOs and, again, whether any government agency either had information on the subject or had interest in. And he revealed one tidbit of information I found very interesting. "He said within NSA, there was a document known only as “the document” and it was on the subject of UFOs and extraterrestrial intelligence. And it was so highly classified that only the Director himself and perhaps one or two other people were actually able to view it. Its existence was widely known, but again, very, very close hold information." Source:

Joe Murgia

53,699 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

CNN’s Omar Jimenez: “ICE has been operating here for years with — with less pushback than than we're seeing right now. And even the St. Paul police chief recently said, is there not a way to find common ground without scaring the hell out of people in the community? Those are his words. And I just wonder with this Operation Metro Surge, is any part of it meant to send a form of political message to the leaders here in Minneapolis and the state of Minnesota? And I know you talked about you've been in touch with the governor's offices and the mayor's offices, but — but why have you not been able to speak to them directly? Have they not been willing to do so?” Vice President JD Vance: “Well, look, I have spoken to some of the people in Minnesota directly. I spoke to some of them today. I spoke to others in the past. And again, our staff has been very direct contact with pretty much every official with any influence or any power in Minneapolis. But no, we're not trying to send a political message. We're trying to enforce the law. And unfortunately, what has happened is that as we've enforced the law, there's been this weird reaction, again, unique to this city. This is not a common thing across the United States of America. There's been a very unique, very Minneapolis specific reaction to our enforcement of federal immigration laws. What I'm trying to do here today is understand why that is. What is it about Minneapolis that has become so chaotic? What are the specific types of cooperation that we need? Look, I don't need Tim Walz or Jacob Frey or anybody else to come out and say that they agree with JD Vance or Donald Trump on immigration. I just don't need that. What I do need them to do is empower their local officials to help our local or help our federal officials out in a way where this can be a little bit less chaotic and it can be a little bit more targeted, like if we're trying to find a sex offender, tell us where the guy lives. Simple things like that, simple changes in how they're approaching immigration enforcement would make this work a lot better. It would make Minneapolis streets a lot safer, and it would make this whole thing a lot less traumatic for this community.”

CNN’s Omar Jimenez: “ICE has been operating here for years with — with less pushback than than we're seeing right now. And even the St. Paul police chief recently said, is there not a way to find common ground without scaring the hell out of people in the community? Those are his words. And I just wonder with this Operation Metro Surge, is any part of it meant to send a form of political message to the leaders here in Minneapolis and the state of Minnesota? And I know you talked about you've been in touch with the governor's offices and the mayor's offices, but — but why have you not been able to speak to them directly? Have they not been willing to do so?” Vice President JD Vance: “Well, look, I have spoken to some of the people in Minnesota directly. I spoke to some of them today. I spoke to others in the past. And again, our staff has been very direct contact with pretty much every official with any influence or any power in Minneapolis. But no, we're not trying to send a political message. We're trying to enforce the law. And unfortunately, what has happened is that as we've enforced the law, there's been this weird reaction, again, unique to this city. This is not a common thing across the United States of America. There's been a very unique, very Minneapolis specific reaction to our enforcement of federal immigration laws. What I'm trying to do here today is understand why that is. What is it about Minneapolis that has become so chaotic? What are the specific types of cooperation that we need? Look, I don't need Tim Walz or Jacob Frey or anybody else to come out and say that they agree with JD Vance or Donald Trump on immigration. I just don't need that. What I do need them to do is empower their local officials to help our local or help our federal officials out in a way where this can be a little bit less chaotic and it can be a little bit more targeted, like if we're trying to find a sex offender, tell us where the guy lives. Simple things like that, simple changes in how they're approaching immigration enforcement would make this work a lot better. It would make Minneapolis streets a lot safer, and it would make this whole thing a lot less traumatic for this community.”

Curtis Houck

121,209 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Jordan Peterson: "If you're competent and silent you will be ignored." "You might think well people should reward you because you're competent. And yes of course they should. But if you're competent and silent then you're just part of the background that's keeping everything functioning" On why you cannot negotiate from a position of weakness: "If you want to push your career forward you have to push it forward. You have to be competent and you have to be strategic" "To be strategic when you negotiate for a new position or a new salary you have to be able to say if you don't give me what I want then something you don't like will happen to you" "It's not a physical threat. It's that you have an option" "You have your CV in order. You're educated and competent and desirable to people outside of your immediate job. You're willing to instantly put yourself on the job market" "So that when you go talk to the person you're negotiating with you're credible" On the one thing most people completely miss about negotiation: "It's very seldom that you're talking to the person who's at the top of the pecking order. What you need to do is tell them a story that they can tell to their boss to make you not a problem" "A good story is look we really need this person because they're hyper competent and they have a better offer" "If you go in there with no power you're going to lose. Obviously" He concludes with the one thing every competent person needs to hear: "The first thing you need to know if you're going to negotiate is that you have to be able to say no. And what no means is that you're not going to do it"

Jordan Peterson: "If you're competent and silent you will be ignored." "You might think well people should reward you because you're competent. And yes of course they should. But if you're competent and silent then you're just part of the background that's keeping everything functioning" On why you cannot negotiate from a position of weakness: "If you want to push your career forward you have to push it forward. You have to be competent and you have to be strategic" "To be strategic when you negotiate for a new position or a new salary you have to be able to say if you don't give me what I want then something you don't like will happen to you" "It's not a physical threat. It's that you have an option" "You have your CV in order. You're educated and competent and desirable to people outside of your immediate job. You're willing to instantly put yourself on the job market" "So that when you go talk to the person you're negotiating with you're credible" On the one thing most people completely miss about negotiation: "It's very seldom that you're talking to the person who's at the top of the pecking order. What you need to do is tell them a story that they can tell to their boss to make you not a problem" "A good story is look we really need this person because they're hyper competent and they have a better offer" "If you go in there with no power you're going to lose. Obviously" He concludes with the one thing every competent person needs to hear: "The first thing you need to know if you're going to negotiate is that you have to be able to say no. And what no means is that you're not going to do it"

Brad

35,334 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat