Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Shermichael Singleton shuts down a New York Times reporter melting down over President Trump receiving the FIFA Peace Prize. Lulu Garcia-Navarro tried to frame the moment as Trump needing people to pander to him, but Shermichael Singleton reminded her of his very real peace efforts. GARCIA-NAVARRO: “The thing is... this. He’s incredibly powerful, and there are real accomplishments that he has actually made.” “And I don’t understand the constant need that he feels to have people sort of pander to him. It’s it’s just a strange impulse when you are the most powerful man in the world.” SINGLETON: “But is there any harm in this? I mean, it’s a very serious question here.” GARCIA-NAVARRO: “Psychologists say, yes.” SINGLETON: “Congo, DRC, I did some work with the DRC a couple of years ago. That’s important. There are some factions that are still fighting there, but you have to acknowledge that.” “Pakistan, India, that was a very real thing.” GARCIA-NAVARRO: “But why is FIFA giving him an award?” SINGLETON: “My point is, there are some very serious resolutions that the president has under his belt in less than a year.” “I don’t have a problem with it being acknowledged, whether it’s FIFA, whether it’s the New York Times, whether it’s CNN, what’s the problem with it?”show more

Overton

242,395 subscribers

45,936 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

CNN’s Shermichael Singleton couldn’t hold back a grin as Jake Tapper melted down over President Trump’s latest AI video dropping a “payload” on protestors. But then Shermichael Singleton said what no one else on the panel would admit about the meme. TAPPER: “What’s the point that he’s making, Shermichael? That he wishes he could drop…human feces on his fellow Americans?” SINGLETON: “Look, this is what I think. I think a lot of Republicans look at this, and I’ve texted with a lot of folks about it…they thought it was hilarious.” “Some of my Democratic friends thought it was a little over the top, but even they acknowledged to me, you know, I got to give it to Trump. He is good at sort of goading our side with some of these sort of satirical videos and other memes that he typically would post on social media.” “It makes him more relatable to the average person.” “You wouldn’t typically see this from a president, but the average person looks at this, Jake, and they sort of laugh or they dislike it, but I don’t think it’s something to sort of set your hair on fire over.”

CNN’s Shermichael Singleton couldn’t hold back a grin as Jake Tapper melted down over President Trump’s latest AI video dropping a “payload” on protestors. But then Shermichael Singleton said what no one else on the panel would admit about the meme. TAPPER: “What’s the point that he’s making, Shermichael? That he wishes he could drop…human feces on his fellow Americans?” SINGLETON: “Look, this is what I think. I think a lot of Republicans look at this, and I’ve texted with a lot of folks about it…they thought it was hilarious.” “Some of my Democratic friends thought it was a little over the top, but even they acknowledged to me, you know, I got to give it to Trump. He is good at sort of goading our side with some of these sort of satirical videos and other memes that he typically would post on social media.” “It makes him more relatable to the average person.” “You wouldn’t typically see this from a president, but the average person looks at this, Jake, and they sort of laugh or they dislike it, but I don’t think it’s something to sort of set your hair on fire over.”

Overton

379,486 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

CNN’s Shermichael Singleton Singleton on last night’s NYC mayoral debate and whether Andrew Cuomo did anything to change the trajectory of the race and a Mamdani victory: “No...I think it’s going to be Mamdani. He’s incredibly talented. As a Republican, I certainly don’t agree with many of his positions. But there is something to be said about the arguments that he’s making to New Yorkers that is palatable. I am concerned about some of his presentations on economics. I’m concerned about the idea of the role of government as it pertains to sort of level setting for people who have economically struggled. I think there’s a different way to go about certain things, but that message is resonating. And if you’re Cuomo, can folks in New York know who Cuomo is? And there’s some real concern about his past misgivings, there’s some concern about some of the things he did as governor. And he didn’t, in my opinion, effectively address those things aggressively enough. Mamdani did. He showcased strength. And even if you’re a New Yorker, you’re curious and maybe say, I don’t disagree with him. You watch that and say, this is a guy who will fight for me, and that moves the needle for voters.”

CNN’s Shermichael Singleton Singleton on last night’s NYC mayoral debate and whether Andrew Cuomo did anything to change the trajectory of the race and a Mamdani victory: “No...I think it’s going to be Mamdani. He’s incredibly talented. As a Republican, I certainly don’t agree with many of his positions. But there is something to be said about the arguments that he’s making to New Yorkers that is palatable. I am concerned about some of his presentations on economics. I’m concerned about the idea of the role of government as it pertains to sort of level setting for people who have economically struggled. I think there’s a different way to go about certain things, but that message is resonating. And if you’re Cuomo, can folks in New York know who Cuomo is? And there’s some real concern about his past misgivings, there’s some concern about some of the things he did as governor. And he didn’t, in my opinion, effectively address those things aggressively enough. Mamdani did. He showcased strength. And even if you’re a New Yorker, you’re curious and maybe say, I don’t disagree with him. You watch that and say, this is a guy who will fight for me, and that moves the needle for voters.”

Curtis Houck

10,567 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Long overdue. Shermichael Singleton refuses to let Abby Phillip bulldoze him during a debate on voter ID. Phillip kept trying to cut him off and talk over him, but Singleton wasn’t going to allow himself to be steamrolled. SINGLETON: “I think most Americans would say, yeah, you got to show an ID in order to vote—” PHILLIP: “Just to be clear, it’s not just voter ID bill.” SINGLETON: “Let me finish my point.” PHILLIP: “It bans mail-in voting, which Republicans use.” SINGLETON: “Let me finish my point. Let me finish my point!” PHILLIP: “In states like Utah and Florida...” SINGLETON: “Let me finish my point, Abby. I understand that there’s nuance to the legislation—” PHILLIP: “It’s important because you can’t just take a poll on voter ID. That’s not going to cut it.” SINGLETON: “But the point is, though, which I was going to make if you would have allowed me to. I understand that there’s nuance to the legislation. There’s always nuance to legislations.”

Long overdue. Shermichael Singleton refuses to let Abby Phillip bulldoze him during a debate on voter ID. Phillip kept trying to cut him off and talk over him, but Singleton wasn’t going to allow himself to be steamrolled. SINGLETON: “I think most Americans would say, yeah, you got to show an ID in order to vote—” PHILLIP: “Just to be clear, it’s not just voter ID bill.” SINGLETON: “Let me finish my point.” PHILLIP: “It bans mail-in voting, which Republicans use.” SINGLETON: “Let me finish my point. Let me finish my point!” PHILLIP: “In states like Utah and Florida...” SINGLETON: “Let me finish my point, Abby. I understand that there’s nuance to the legislation—” PHILLIP: “It’s important because you can’t just take a poll on voter ID. That’s not going to cut it.” SINGLETON: “But the point is, though, which I was going to make if you would have allowed me to. I understand that there’s nuance to the legislation. There’s always nuance to legislations.”

Overton

145,911 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Scott Jennings: “If we defang them and bring some stability to the Middle East and the world by this action, I think overtime the American people will think it’s a good decision.” Lulu Garcia-Navarro: “L-O-L, sorry.” Scott Jennings: “I’m sorry. What does that mean?” Lulu Garcia-Navarro: “I know. I know, it's not your age group, but laugh out loud.” Scott Jennings: “Is that a serious response to a serious answer?” Lulu Garcia-Navarro: It is a serious response--” Scott Jennings: “Why? Are those not worthy objectives.” Lulu Garcia-Navarro: “It wasn't a serious answer which is this…” Scott Jennings: “‘L-M-A-O.’ That's my response to that. We take their missiles. We take away their navy. We take away their air force, and we take away their capability of nuclear weapons. They have missiles that could reach most of Europe. If you want to leave them in place to do that for 47 years, that's a choice.” Lulu Garcia-Navarro “Are they not still in place?” Scott Jennings: “These things I just listed are not in place! They are not in place!”

Scott Jennings: “If we defang them and bring some stability to the Middle East and the world by this action, I think overtime the American people will think it’s a good decision.” Lulu Garcia-Navarro: “L-O-L, sorry.” Scott Jennings: “I’m sorry. What does that mean?” Lulu Garcia-Navarro: “I know. I know, it's not your age group, but laugh out loud.” Scott Jennings: “Is that a serious response to a serious answer?” Lulu Garcia-Navarro: It is a serious response--” Scott Jennings: “Why? Are those not worthy objectives.” Lulu Garcia-Navarro: “It wasn't a serious answer which is this…” Scott Jennings: “‘L-M-A-O.’ That's my response to that. We take their missiles. We take away their navy. We take away their air force, and we take away their capability of nuclear weapons. They have missiles that could reach most of Europe. If you want to leave them in place to do that for 47 years, that's a choice.” Lulu Garcia-Navarro “Are they not still in place?” Scott Jennings: “These things I just listed are not in place! They are not in place!”

RedWave Press

271,418 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

CNN's Shermichael Singleton Singleton to Jake Tapper on whether he's "heard any Democrats encourage violence explicilty" against ICE... "Oh, I've heard people say, put your bodies on the line. I've heard people say, you got to do whatever you think is necessary to protect your friends and neighbors. Now, I'm not saying this is representative of every single person who may disagree with the policies coming from my side, but there are certainly some agitators out there who are going to take that message to the extreme. We have seen some of that."

CNN's Shermichael Singleton Singleton to Jake Tapper on whether he's "heard any Democrats encourage violence explicilty" against ICE... "Oh, I've heard people say, put your bodies on the line. I've heard people say, you got to do whatever you think is necessary to protect your friends and neighbors. Now, I'm not saying this is representative of every single person who may disagree with the policies coming from my side, but there are certainly some agitators out there who are going to take that message to the extreme. We have seen some of that."

Curtis Houck

94,421 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

NYT’s Lulu Garcia-Navarro: So, you have equated anti-Zionism with antisemitism. ADL’s Jonathan Greenblatt: It is. Lulu Garcia-Navarro: One of the things I heard from people is that anti-Zionism for them is a desire to have the rights of Palestinians be equal to the rights of Jews in Israel and the Palestinian territories. Is that definition of anti-Zionism to you antisemitic? Jonathan Greenblatt: Well, look... if you believe my definition of Zionism — which is really not my definition, it’s widely accepted — it’s peculiar to me how anti-Zionism isn’t the opposite of that. How people choose to interpret it, to embellish it, to sort of dress it up as something other than what it is. But the reality is if you believe how I laid out Zionism, then anti-Zionism is pretty simple. Lulu Garcia-Navarro: I think the challenge is if someone defines their view of anti-Zionism in a way that allows for Jews to exist in a state of Israel but that grants Palestinians rights — but you’re seeing that as antisemitic.

NYT’s Lulu Garcia-Navarro: So, you have equated anti-Zionism with antisemitism. ADL’s Jonathan Greenblatt: It is. Lulu Garcia-Navarro: One of the things I heard from people is that anti-Zionism for them is a desire to have the rights of Palestinians be equal to the rights of Jews in Israel and the Palestinian territories. Is that definition of anti-Zionism to you antisemitic? Jonathan Greenblatt: Well, look... if you believe my definition of Zionism — which is really not my definition, it’s widely accepted — it’s peculiar to me how anti-Zionism isn’t the opposite of that. How people choose to interpret it, to embellish it, to sort of dress it up as something other than what it is. But the reality is if you believe how I laid out Zionism, then anti-Zionism is pretty simple. Lulu Garcia-Navarro: I think the challenge is if someone defines their view of anti-Zionism in a way that allows for Jews to exist in a state of Israel but that grants Palestinians rights — but you’re seeing that as antisemitic.

Drop Site

219,025 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Bill Maher admits to Kevin Spacey there are times he wishes he could clap back at the media the same way President Trump does — “You’re a terrible person!” MAHER: “You want to say it back to the media and I won’t about, you know, anything because you just don’t want to pick that fight with them.” “But sometimes when I see Trump just speak his complete internal monologue, without doing things that...” “He will say something and the one I’m thinking of is like, I’ve wanted to say that...” “Somebody pissed him off in an interview and he just went; ‘You’re a terrible person!’” SPACEY: “Right, right.” MAHER: “I can’t deny...there is a moment where I would have...that’s EXACTLY what I was thinking!” “You’re a terrible person. It’s not a sincere question, it’s a gotcha thing, it’s a virtue signaling thing. You don’t believe it yourself, but I don’t.” “Not our president.”

Bill Maher admits to Kevin Spacey there are times he wishes he could clap back at the media the same way President Trump does — “You’re a terrible person!” MAHER: “You want to say it back to the media and I won’t about, you know, anything because you just don’t want to pick that fight with them.” “But sometimes when I see Trump just speak his complete internal monologue, without doing things that...” “He will say something and the one I’m thinking of is like, I’ve wanted to say that...” “Somebody pissed him off in an interview and he just went; ‘You’re a terrible person!’” SPACEY: “Right, right.” MAHER: “I can’t deny...there is a moment where I would have...that’s EXACTLY what I was thinking!” “You’re a terrible person. It’s not a sincere question, it’s a gotcha thing, it’s a virtue signaling thing. You don’t believe it yourself, but I don’t.” “Not our president.”

Overton

495,648 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

🚨HOLY MOLY: Ana Navarro's complete meltdown on CNN just caused Abby Phillip to cut to commercial. Shermichael Singleton: "If you com to this country illegally, you are going HOME!" Ana Navarro: "There's a hell of a lot of people who other than the black people who were brought here as slaves, who came to this country illegally." WHAT?! Shermichael Singleton: "They are NOT the same as black people who were brought here against our will!" This is when she started choking up — almost as if she was about to cry. Ana Navarro: "That's exactly what I just said!" Shermichael Singleton: "Last time I checked, I'm black. You're not." Ana Navarro: "I'm Latino and my people are being racially profiled!"

🚨HOLY MOLY: Ana Navarro's complete meltdown on CNN just caused Abby Phillip to cut to commercial. Shermichael Singleton: "If you com to this country illegally, you are going HOME!" Ana Navarro: "There's a hell of a lot of people who other than the black people who were brought here as slaves, who came to this country illegally." WHAT?! Shermichael Singleton: "They are NOT the same as black people who were brought here against our will!" This is when she started choking up — almost as if she was about to cry. Ana Navarro: "That's exactly what I just said!" Shermichael Singleton: "Last time I checked, I'm black. You're not." Ana Navarro: "I'm Latino and my people are being racially profiled!"

Townhall.com

1,302,794 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

EYE ROLL: Scott Pelley says “it was fate” that he chose to tear into his new bosses to their faces and cries AGAIN when saying “newsrooms are sort of like the military” and have “life-threatening job[s]” with “very strong bonds” that demand “people…go to war zones when…pregnant” He adds Bari Weiss, Nick Bilton, and their lieutenants “have never felt that” in their lives… Lulu Garcia-Navarro: “Why did you feel compelled to speak up?” Pelley: “It was fate. First of all, our entire senior staff had been wiped out there and out there. I looked around the room, I’m the only correspondent there, which surprised me very much. I learned that my colleagues were out shooting stories as they should be in the month of June. But I’m the only correspondent there, which surprised me. And I looked around at my friends and colleagues in the room and realized I was the senior person. Only I could do it. None of them could be asked to take that risk. So, when I saw Nick Bilton’s email and then saw him reading to my broken-hearted people off his phone, I felt that somebody had to stand up for the broadcast, not just the broadcast, but the people. There are people in that room who go to war zones when they are pregnant. [SOBBING] Newsrooms are sort of like the military or the police or the beautiful people at the FDNY down the street. It is a life-threatening job in many instances. And very strong bonds, very emotional bonds are found or are developed in that kind of setting. And to have people running CBS News who don’t know that, have never felt that, and don’t understand it, is a tragedy I never expected to see.”

EYE ROLL: Scott Pelley says “it was fate” that he chose to tear into his new bosses to their faces and cries AGAIN when saying “newsrooms are sort of like the military” and have “life-threatening job[s]” with “very strong bonds” that demand “people…go to war zones when…pregnant” He adds Bari Weiss, Nick Bilton, and their lieutenants “have never felt that” in their lives… Lulu Garcia-Navarro: “Why did you feel compelled to speak up?” Pelley: “It was fate. First of all, our entire senior staff had been wiped out there and out there. I looked around the room, I’m the only correspondent there, which surprised me very much. I learned that my colleagues were out shooting stories as they should be in the month of June. But I’m the only correspondent there, which surprised me. And I looked around at my friends and colleagues in the room and realized I was the senior person. Only I could do it. None of them could be asked to take that risk. So, when I saw Nick Bilton’s email and then saw him reading to my broken-hearted people off his phone, I felt that somebody had to stand up for the broadcast, not just the broadcast, but the people. There are people in that room who go to war zones when they are pregnant. [SOBBING] Newsrooms are sort of like the military or the police or the beautiful people at the FDNY down the street. It is a life-threatening job in many instances. And very strong bonds, very emotional bonds are found or are developed in that kind of setting. And to have people running CBS News who don’t know that, have never felt that, and don’t understand it, is a tragedy I never expected to see.”

Curtis Houck

15,067 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Vice President Vance completely SHUTS DOWN Ana Navarro on The View when she tried to claim that President Trump “loves” inflation. As soon as she said it, Vance was right next to her to set the record straight and provide the context. NAVARRO: “He just said he loves the inflation...” VANCE: “What he said Ana, what he said, is that he loves the fact that the inflation is going to come down when this war is over.” “That’s what he said.” GOLDBERG: “That’s not what he said.” BEHAR: “Wait, are you his interpreter or are you his vice president?” VANCE: “Look, what the president said...people were asking about the inflation. They were asking about the affordability problem, which again, is very real.” “And what he said I love the inflation because it’s going to come down when the war is over.” “Now, again we already see gas prices today, $4.06 a gallon. Too high. But WAY down from where they were a couple weeks ago.” “There’s a lot we gotta do, but I think that we’re doing as much as we can.” “We’re going to keep on working at it, and again, the American people are going to make their verdict.” “But I think we have a very credible case to run on that we brought a lot of new investment. We’re building the factories, that is going to pay serious dividends for the American people over the long haul.”

Vice President Vance completely SHUTS DOWN Ana Navarro on The View when she tried to claim that President Trump “loves” inflation. As soon as she said it, Vance was right next to her to set the record straight and provide the context. NAVARRO: “He just said he loves the inflation...” VANCE: “What he said Ana, what he said, is that he loves the fact that the inflation is going to come down when this war is over.” “That’s what he said.” GOLDBERG: “That’s not what he said.” BEHAR: “Wait, are you his interpreter or are you his vice president?” VANCE: “Look, what the president said...people were asking about the inflation. They were asking about the affordability problem, which again, is very real.” “And what he said I love the inflation because it’s going to come down when the war is over.” “Now, again we already see gas prices today, $4.06 a gallon. Too high. But WAY down from where they were a couple weeks ago.” “There’s a lot we gotta do, but I think that we’re doing as much as we can.” “We’re going to keep on working at it, and again, the American people are going to make their verdict.” “But I think we have a very credible case to run on that we brought a lot of new investment. We’re building the factories, that is going to pay serious dividends for the American people over the long haul.”

Overton

45,165 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Trump is stronger today, 10 years later than he was in 2015. Why is that? What is it that is has animated people to say—Latinos, Black men, to say, I LOVE that man? I’m FOR him. Not that some of them don’t like.Democrats, because some of them do. But I am for this man. Because we [democrats] refuse to accept that there may be some logic and some reason, and some of the things Donald Trump says… It’s easier to just say, he’s Hitler, he’s a dictator, people are crazy, he’s conned them, he’s a liar. All the things you hear said, day after day. This is why we [Dems] are still in the same place today that we were 10 years ago. We still don’t know how to combat him.We have had NO victories. The only theory we had against Trump this year? Jimmy Kimmel. - Dan Turrentine on the Left's frustration with Trump.

Trump is stronger today, 10 years later than he was in 2015. Why is that? What is it that is has animated people to say—Latinos, Black men, to say, I LOVE that man? I’m FOR him. Not that some of them don’t like.Democrats, because some of them do. But I am for this man. Because we [democrats] refuse to accept that there may be some logic and some reason, and some of the things Donald Trump says… It’s easier to just say, he’s Hitler, he’s a dictator, people are crazy, he’s conned them, he’s a liar. All the things you hear said, day after day. This is why we [Dems] are still in the same place today that we were 10 years ago. We still don’t know how to combat him.We have had NO victories. The only theory we had against Trump this year? Jimmy Kimmel. - Dan Turrentine on the Left's frustration with Trump.

Tosca Austen

15,195 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Shermichael Singleton absolutely schools the CNN panel on birthright citizenship. He drops the receipts showing that Democrats once agreed it was a loophole Congress needed to shut down. SINGLETON: “Philosophically, I fundamentally disagree with the court on this. To me, I go back to subject to the jurisdiction of, going back to the original intent of the 1866 Civil Rights Act forward the 14th Amendment being passed.” “What was it to address? What was it to codify?” “It was freed slaves who did not have citizenship. It wasn’t freed slaves and any and everybody else across the globe.” “Of the 27 EU countries, NONE of them, none of the civilized Western countries allow or permit unconditional immigration. None of the Western countries allow it. With the exception of the United States and Canada.” “Now, that is not to say that we should not have an immigration policy where we welcome people. I think we absolutely should. It’s made our country very strong.” “But does it mean we should allow anyone to just come into the country, merely have a child and that child be granted citizenship? I would say not.” “And in fact, Democrats actually believed the same thing.” “You go back to 1993 when Harry Reid introduced Immigration Stabilization Act. His argument at the time was, you’re allowing people to take advantage of our country.” “Senator Dianne Feinstein agreed at the time. Several other Democrats agreed at the time.” “So once upon a time, there was bipartisan support that this is a problem that should be addressed by Congress.” “Now, I would agree that the that the executive branch should not have carte Blanche authority to just do whatever he or she will...I would agree there.” “But Congress needs to act on this by passing an amendment, again, I disagree with the interpretation by the court.” Shermichael Singleton

Shermichael Singleton absolutely schools the CNN panel on birthright citizenship. He drops the receipts showing that Democrats once agreed it was a loophole Congress needed to shut down. SINGLETON: “Philosophically, I fundamentally disagree with the court on this. To me, I go back to subject to the jurisdiction of, going back to the original intent of the 1866 Civil Rights Act forward the 14th Amendment being passed.” “What was it to address? What was it to codify?” “It was freed slaves who did not have citizenship. It wasn’t freed slaves and any and everybody else across the globe.” “Of the 27 EU countries, NONE of them, none of the civilized Western countries allow or permit unconditional immigration. None of the Western countries allow it. With the exception of the United States and Canada.” “Now, that is not to say that we should not have an immigration policy where we welcome people. I think we absolutely should. It’s made our country very strong.” “But does it mean we should allow anyone to just come into the country, merely have a child and that child be granted citizenship? I would say not.” “And in fact, Democrats actually believed the same thing.” “You go back to 1993 when Harry Reid introduced Immigration Stabilization Act. His argument at the time was, you’re allowing people to take advantage of our country.” “Senator Dianne Feinstein agreed at the time. Several other Democrats agreed at the time.” “So once upon a time, there was bipartisan support that this is a problem that should be addressed by Congress.” “Now, I would agree that the that the executive branch should not have carte Blanche authority to just do whatever he or she will...I would agree there.” “But Congress needs to act on this by passing an amendment, again, I disagree with the interpretation by the court.” Shermichael Singleton

Overton

39,297 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

Mark Levin says he trusts President Trump on a ceasefire with Iran but warns the threat isn’t over, arguing the regime will regroup with help from China and Russia: “I trust President Trump. I know his heart. I know he wants to do the right thing. I know that he has people telling him to do something else, and other advisors telling him something different, but he’s the most understanding and competent of the bunch. And he’s the President of the United States, and his instincts are very, very good. But I would say this: this enemy is still the enemy. They’re still surviving. Their military may be destroyed, but the Communist Chinese will still help them, and the Russians will still help them rebuild. So this thing’s not over. And it’s not that I’m a warmonger—it’s that they’re the warmongers. It’s not that I’m an interventionist—it’s that they’re the interventionists.”

Mark Levin says he trusts President Trump on a ceasefire with Iran but warns the threat isn’t over, arguing the regime will regroup with help from China and Russia: “I trust President Trump. I know his heart. I know he wants to do the right thing. I know that he has people telling him to do something else, and other advisors telling him something different, but he’s the most understanding and competent of the bunch. And he’s the President of the United States, and his instincts are very, very good. But I would say this: this enemy is still the enemy. They’re still surviving. Their military may be destroyed, but the Communist Chinese will still help them, and the Russians will still help them rebuild. So this thing’s not over. And it’s not that I’m a warmonger—it’s that they’re the warmongers. It’s not that I’m an interventionist—it’s that they’re the interventionists.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

644,300 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Trump: I think it’s very sad, actually. I’m surprised that it wasn’t—you know—the public wasn’t notified a long time ago, because to get to stage 9, that’s a long time. I just had my physical. You saw that. You saw the results of that particular test. I think that test is standard to pretty much anybody getting a physical—a good physical. We had the doctors at the White House and over at Walter Reed, which is a fantastic hospital, do it. I did a very complete physical, including a cognitive test. I’m proud to announce I aced it. I got them all right. You proud of me? Your husband would be proud of me for getting them all right. It’s a little risk. If I didn’t get them all right, these people would be after me. It would be not a good situation. But I think, frankly, anybody running for president should take a cognitive test. They say it’s unconstitutional, but I would say in that particular case, having a cognitive test wouldn’t be so bad. But when you take tests—medical, as a male—that test is very standard. I don’t know if it’s given to everybody, but it’s given just about. And it takes a long time to get to that situation… to get to a stage 9. I think that if you take a look, it’s the same doctor that said that Joe was cognitively fine, there was nothing wrong with him. If it’s the same doctor, he said there was nothing wrong there. That’s been proven to be a sad situation. And the autopen is becoming a very big deal. You know, the autopen is becoming a big deal because it seems that maybe it was the president—whoever operated the autopen. But when they say that was not good, they also—you have to look and you have to say that the test was not so good either. In other words, there are things going on that the public wasn’t informed [about], and I think somebody is going to have to speak to his doctor—if it’s the same or even if it’s two separate doctors. Why wasn’t the cognitive ability—why wasn’t that discussed? And I think the doctor said he’s just fine, and it’s turned out that’s not so. It’s very dangerous… this is dangerous for our country. Look at the mess we are in. You talk about all these questions on Ukraine and Russia. That would’ve never happened, as an example, if I were president. It would’ve never happened. The other thing—you have to say: Why did it take so long? I mean, this takes a long time. It can take years to get to this level of danger. It’s a very, very sad situation. I feel very badly about it. And I think people should try and find out what happened. Because I’ll tell you, I don’t know if it had anything to do with the hospital. Walter Reed is really good. They’re some of the best doctors I’ve ever seen. I don’t even know if they were involved. But a doctor was involved in each case. Maybe it was the same doctor. And somebody is not telling the facts. That’s a big problem.

Trump: I think it’s very sad, actually. I’m surprised that it wasn’t—you know—the public wasn’t notified a long time ago, because to get to stage 9, that’s a long time. I just had my physical. You saw that. You saw the results of that particular test. I think that test is standard to pretty much anybody getting a physical—a good physical. We had the doctors at the White House and over at Walter Reed, which is a fantastic hospital, do it. I did a very complete physical, including a cognitive test. I’m proud to announce I aced it. I got them all right. You proud of me? Your husband would be proud of me for getting them all right. It’s a little risk. If I didn’t get them all right, these people would be after me. It would be not a good situation. But I think, frankly, anybody running for president should take a cognitive test. They say it’s unconstitutional, but I would say in that particular case, having a cognitive test wouldn’t be so bad. But when you take tests—medical, as a male—that test is very standard. I don’t know if it’s given to everybody, but it’s given just about. And it takes a long time to get to that situation… to get to a stage 9. I think that if you take a look, it’s the same doctor that said that Joe was cognitively fine, there was nothing wrong with him. If it’s the same doctor, he said there was nothing wrong there. That’s been proven to be a sad situation. And the autopen is becoming a very big deal. You know, the autopen is becoming a big deal because it seems that maybe it was the president—whoever operated the autopen. But when they say that was not good, they also—you have to look and you have to say that the test was not so good either. In other words, there are things going on that the public wasn’t informed [about], and I think somebody is going to have to speak to his doctor—if it’s the same or even if it’s two separate doctors. Why wasn’t the cognitive ability—why wasn’t that discussed? And I think the doctor said he’s just fine, and it’s turned out that’s not so. It’s very dangerous… this is dangerous for our country. Look at the mess we are in. You talk about all these questions on Ukraine and Russia. That would’ve never happened, as an example, if I were president. It would’ve never happened. The other thing—you have to say: Why did it take so long? I mean, this takes a long time. It can take years to get to this level of danger. It’s a very, very sad situation. I feel very badly about it. And I think people should try and find out what happened. Because I’ll tell you, I don’t know if it had anything to do with the hospital. Walter Reed is really good. They’re some of the best doctors I’ve ever seen. I don’t even know if they were involved. But a doctor was involved in each case. Maybe it was the same doctor. And somebody is not telling the facts. That’s a big problem.

Acyn

656,645 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Everyone should listen to this clip of Trump and really try to understand what he is accomplishing. “It’s a big chess game at a very high level. It’s very high level chess, the highest. And I’m dealing with very smart players. These are very smart people. They don’t get there…You know, when you deal with some of these people, you’re dealing with very high-level intellect, very high IQ people. These are not Jasmine Crockett and her group. These are smart people. These are really smart people. And violent people, ambitious people. And some very nice people. And some are very nice but violent.” This is the side of Trump that most people don’t understand. He is one of the most brilliant, if not the most, strategic minds we have ever seen. Every move he makes is calculated, well thought out, and at the highest level of risk on the world stage. But most importantly, he always ends up with a win. Show the man the respect he deserves 🇺🇸

Everyone should listen to this clip of Trump and really try to understand what he is accomplishing. “It’s a big chess game at a very high level. It’s very high level chess, the highest. And I’m dealing with very smart players. These are very smart people. They don’t get there…You know, when you deal with some of these people, you’re dealing with very high-level intellect, very high IQ people. These are not Jasmine Crockett and her group. These are smart people. These are really smart people. And violent people, ambitious people. And some very nice people. And some are very nice but violent.” This is the side of Trump that most people don’t understand. He is one of the most brilliant, if not the most, strategic minds we have ever seen. Every move he makes is calculated, well thought out, and at the highest level of risk on the world stage. But most importantly, he always ends up with a win. Show the man the respect he deserves 🇺🇸

TheStormHasArrived

413,831 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee: When it comes down to whether the Turks will have a role, I don’t think they will as long as the Israelis feel that it is not something that they can absorb. I think the comments that Erdogan has made, some of which are very incendiary, are troubling. Israel would love to see some resolution. It’s possible Türkiye could decide that normalization with Israel and tempering down the very inflammatory rhetoric is in their best interest.

US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee: When it comes down to whether the Turks will have a role, I don’t think they will as long as the Israelis feel that it is not something that they can absorb. I think the comments that Erdogan has made, some of which are very incendiary, are troubling. Israel would love to see some resolution. It’s possible Türkiye could decide that normalization with Israel and tempering down the very inflammatory rhetoric is in their best interest.

Clash Report

37,810 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

Arjun Khemani

23,056 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨President Trump announced that there might be a high-level meeting with Zelenskyy as early as this weekend, but didn’t specify if he would participate, and once again reiterated that UA should hold elections right now (note: it’s against the constitution to hold elections during the martial law, also it’s simply not safe, and UA society is widely opposed to the idea). TRUMP: “They would like us to go to a meeting over the weekend, in Europe, and we’ll make a determination depending on what they come back with. We don’t wanna be wasting time. Sometimes you have to let people fight it out, and sometimes you don’t. But the problem with letting people fight it out is you’re losing thousands of people a week. It’s ridiculous. The whole thing is ridiculous.” Q: “And when you say that the European leaders want to have a meeting over the weekend, are you talking about with Zelenskyy or with them?” TRUMP: “With Zelenskyy and us.” Q: “And you said in an interview yesterday that you think it’s time for Zelenskyy to start accepting things. What things are you talking about?” TRUMP: “Well, I think he has to be realistic. And I do wonder about how long is it gonna be till they have an election. You know, for a democracy, it’s a long time. They haven’t had an election in a long time. There was a poll that came out, 82% of the people are demanding a settlement be made, Ukrainian people. They wanna see a settlement be made. I understand that. They’re losing thousands and thousands of people a week. They wanna see it ended. And I do say at what point, when do they have an election in Ukraine? That’s not casting aspersions on anybody, but they do have a massive corruption situation going on there… People are asking this question, ‘When do they have an election?’ Are they gonna have an election, or are they gonna just keep it going like this? So, I think it’s time to get that war settled, and I think it’s a war that can be settled. But it takes two to tango.”

🚨President Trump announced that there might be a high-level meeting with Zelenskyy as early as this weekend, but didn’t specify if he would participate, and once again reiterated that UA should hold elections right now (note: it’s against the constitution to hold elections during the martial law, also it’s simply not safe, and UA society is widely opposed to the idea). TRUMP: “They would like us to go to a meeting over the weekend, in Europe, and we’ll make a determination depending on what they come back with. We don’t wanna be wasting time. Sometimes you have to let people fight it out, and sometimes you don’t. But the problem with letting people fight it out is you’re losing thousands of people a week. It’s ridiculous. The whole thing is ridiculous.” Q: “And when you say that the European leaders want to have a meeting over the weekend, are you talking about with Zelenskyy or with them?” TRUMP: “With Zelenskyy and us.” Q: “And you said in an interview yesterday that you think it’s time for Zelenskyy to start accepting things. What things are you talking about?” TRUMP: “Well, I think he has to be realistic. And I do wonder about how long is it gonna be till they have an election. You know, for a democracy, it’s a long time. They haven’t had an election in a long time. There was a poll that came out, 82% of the people are demanding a settlement be made, Ukrainian people. They wanna see a settlement be made. I understand that. They’re losing thousands and thousands of people a week. They wanna see it ended. And I do say at what point, when do they have an election in Ukraine? That’s not casting aspersions on anybody, but they do have a massive corruption situation going on there… People are asking this question, ‘When do they have an election?’ Are they gonna have an election, or are they gonna just keep it going like this? So, I think it’s time to get that war settled, and I think it’s a war that can be settled. But it takes two to tango.”

Kateryna Lisunova

10,801 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🚨🇺🇸 SHERMICHAEL SINGLETON: LAUNCHING MISSILES INTO IRAN COULD SPIRAL... THIS MAY NOT END WELL “We're potentially on the brink of launching missiles into a foreign country. And so, regardless of what you think about these individuals' experience, the people who are around them, those career individuals, are gonna have to advise the hell out of them to make the best decisions to advise the president. My hope is that the president doesn't make this decision. I don't think that this is going to end well for us because there is the opportunity for Iran to retaliate.” Source: CNN Shermichael Singleton

🚨🇺🇸 SHERMICHAEL SINGLETON: LAUNCHING MISSILES INTO IRAN COULD SPIRAL... THIS MAY NOT END WELL “We're potentially on the brink of launching missiles into a foreign country. And so, regardless of what you think about these individuals' experience, the people who are around them, those career individuals, are gonna have to advise the hell out of them to make the best decisions to advise the president. My hope is that the president doesn't make this decision. I don't think that this is going to end well for us because there is the opportunity for Iran to retaliate.” Source: CNN Shermichael Singleton

Mario Nawfal

297,391 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce