Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🤫Shhhhh, hidden material secrets like Custom Primitive Data can be super helpful. They are kinda like Material Instances, but not.... Cleverlike Creator School: #UEFNTips #UETips #UEFN #UE5 #GameDev #fortnite Cleverlike Studios

Ian Southwell

3,186 subscribers

22,473 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Gaming #UEFNTips #UETips #UEFN #UE5 #GameDev #fortnite

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

"They ask Sam Faddis about LOCATING THE URANIUM MATERIAL does that mean they are talking about Boots in the ground sir" SAM FADDIS says "we know there where trucks running in & out of FORDOW and WE KNOWS STUFF LEFT. Are we talking about using Rangers & Tier 1 operators BUT WE KNOW HOW THIS ENDS & ITS BADLY" Jack Poso 🇺🇸 says, " In a situation like this they can have DEVRGU (SEAL TEAM SIX) go in since they are dealing with WMD material & Tier 1 operators would be needed at MINIMUM"

"They ask Sam Faddis about LOCATING THE URANIUM MATERIAL does that mean they are talking about Boots in the ground sir" SAM FADDIS says "we know there where trucks running in & out of FORDOW and WE KNOWS STUFF LEFT. Are we talking about using Rangers & Tier 1 operators BUT WE KNOW HOW THIS ENDS & ITS BADLY" Jack Poso 🇺🇸 says, " In a situation like this they can have DEVRGU (SEAL TEAM SIX) go in since they are dealing with WMD material & Tier 1 operators would be needed at MINIMUM"

Johnny St.Pete

56,710 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This outstanding young man has attempted to contact school officials about the fact that their school libraries are making the Quran available but not The Bible! Apparently the school officials have been ducking him acting like 5 year olds and this young is definitely the adult in this scenario! We have a huge problem when a school is making a Quran available and not The Bible. It's called GATEKEEPING!! I'll say the quiet part OUT LOUD making one specific "religious" material ( Quran ) available is "INDOCTRINATION" Making religious material available for reference is allowed and not a violation of the 1st Amendment as long as there are no religious gatherings in said library. BUT excluding The Bible is HUGE problem and must be dealt with quickly and hopefully by involved parents and young people like Mr. Lopez.

This outstanding young man has attempted to contact school officials about the fact that their school libraries are making the Quran available but not The Bible! Apparently the school officials have been ducking him acting like 5 year olds and this young is definitely the adult in this scenario! We have a huge problem when a school is making a Quran available and not The Bible. It's called GATEKEEPING!! I'll say the quiet part OUT LOUD making one specific "religious" material ( Quran ) available is "INDOCTRINATION" Making religious material available for reference is allowed and not a violation of the 1st Amendment as long as there are no religious gatherings in said library. BUT excluding The Bible is HUGE problem and must be dealt with quickly and hopefully by involved parents and young people like Mr. Lopez.

Kat™ The Hammer ⚒️

34,321 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

#BREAKING: Hayes: I’m not an expert but even I didn’t expect the material to be peeling off in a number of DAYS. What exactly did they do there? 😂 Maxine Joselow: “What I can say is that federal contracting records and internal Park Service documents show that this material that they spread on the bottom of the Reflecting Pool to waterproof the bottom is called Rhino Liner 5000. It is a polyurethane coating that is typically used in truck bed liners and in pipes including water pipes and sewage pipes, and It is NOT typically used in swimming pools or in large water basins like the Reflecting Pool.” 🙄🤦‍♀️

#BREAKING: Hayes: I’m not an expert but even I didn’t expect the material to be peeling off in a number of DAYS. What exactly did they do there? 😂 Maxine Joselow: “What I can say is that federal contracting records and internal Park Service documents show that this material that they spread on the bottom of the Reflecting Pool to waterproof the bottom is called Rhino Liner 5000. It is a polyurethane coating that is typically used in truck bed liners and in pipes including water pipes and sewage pipes, and It is NOT typically used in swimming pools or in large water basins like the Reflecting Pool.” 🙄🤦‍♀️

Emoluments Clause

631,564 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Over the last few months, we’ve been thinking about how to learn from “off-domain” data - data from non-robot sources like video or simulation. These data sources are not quite good enough to learn policies (even monolithic VLA models) directly, but they still contain lots of information that can be useful for generalizable robot control. How can we develop robot learning models that are able to make use of this type of data for generalizable control? In new work, that we call HAMSTER, we show that VLMs can be useful for enabling robotic learning from off-domain data, but specifically when used through hierarchical VLA architectures. We show that this class of models can learn generalizable robot policies for the real world from large-scale, off-domain data. A 🧵 (1/10)

Over the last few months, we’ve been thinking about how to learn from “off-domain” data - data from non-robot sources like video or simulation. These data sources are not quite good enough to learn policies (even monolithic VLA models) directly, but they still contain lots of information that can be useful for generalizable robot control. How can we develop robot learning models that are able to make use of this type of data for generalizable control? In new work, that we call HAMSTER, we show that VLMs can be useful for enabling robotic learning from off-domain data, but specifically when used through hierarchical VLA architectures. We show that this class of models can learn generalizable robot policies for the real world from large-scale, off-domain data. A 🧵 (1/10)

Abhishek Gupta

11,994 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"Russia will never return to what it once was; it will move somewhere else. And so far, all signs indicate that it will not be some beautiful afar." Russian political analyst Pavel Luzin said that Russia has already passed the point of no return by refusing modernization and education, which is rapidly leading to the simplification of its material and scientific base. According to him, there is also no demand for modernization and education in Russian society, and despite the degradation, Russians are ready to fight, and if necessary, they will fight "with sticks." Thus, Russia is sliding into something like Hezbollah, where a primitive material base is offset by a desire to fight, often targeting the civilian population.

"Russia will never return to what it once was; it will move somewhere else. And so far, all signs indicate that it will not be some beautiful afar." Russian political analyst Pavel Luzin said that Russia has already passed the point of no return by refusing modernization and education, which is rapidly leading to the simplification of its material and scientific base. According to him, there is also no demand for modernization and education in Russian society, and despite the degradation, Russians are ready to fight, and if necessary, they will fight "with sticks." Thus, Russia is sliding into something like Hezbollah, where a primitive material base is offset by a desire to fight, often targeting the civilian population.

Anton Gerashchenko

140,142 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

KPMG Interview with Channels. Some people told me to go and watch the KPMG interview with channels and withdraw my statement. It looks like they themselves did not watch what they asked me to go and watch. Data boys, I know you don’t have enough data. I have watched the interview. You can now watch it here. But before you close your ears to the truth, look for these points clearly stated 1. KPMG is not backing out. 2. KPMG is not backing down. 3. KPMG is not apologising, but diplomatic. 4. They said their newsletter was misrepresented. 5. They were not attacking the tax law. 6. They were not trying to compete with anyone. 7. They were not discrediting anyone’s work. 8. KPMG supports the tax reform. 9. They are saying big tax reforms always come with issues. 10. They are saying errors are normal in large reforms. 11. They are saying errors can be corrected after enactment. 12. They are saying a law being passed does not make it perfect or sacred. 13. They are saying Nigeria’s tax law must fit Nigeria’s reality, not copied blindly. 14. They are saying copy-and-paste tax laws can damage the economy. 15. They are saying some provisions can scare investors. 16. They are saying bad tax design can cause capital flight. 17. They are saying investors have options and can leave Nigeria. 18. They are saying Nigeria is not the only place investors can invest. 19. They are saying corporate tax rates must be competitive. 20. They are saying if taxes are too heavy, companies may exit Nigeria. 21. They are saying the direct transfer of shares tax, if not carefully applied, can discourage foreign investors, especially considering Nigeria’s current stage of development. 22. They are saying some countries do it, but Nigeria must ask if it is right for us now. 23. They are saying the Nigerian government needs revenue, but also needs investment. 24. They are saying revenue drive should not destroy investment inflow. 25. They are saying unclear laws create disputes with tax authorities. 26. They are saying disputes lead to long court cases. 27. They are saying long disputes delay government revenue. 28. They are saying laws must be written in simple and clear language. 29. They are saying clarity reduces misinterpretation and litigation. 30. They are saying early clarification builds trust in the tax system. 31. They are saying confidence in tax law is critical for compliance. 32. They are saying public discussion of the tax law is good. 33. They are saying misrepresentation and misinformation are the real danger. 34. They acknowledged the reform is transformational. 35. They agreed a great job was done, but the law needed to be written with Nigeria’s context in mind.

KPMG Interview with Channels. Some people told me to go and watch the KPMG interview with channels and withdraw my statement. It looks like they themselves did not watch what they asked me to go and watch. Data boys, I know you don’t have enough data. I have watched the interview. You can now watch it here. But before you close your ears to the truth, look for these points clearly stated 1. KPMG is not backing out. 2. KPMG is not backing down. 3. KPMG is not apologising, but diplomatic. 4. They said their newsletter was misrepresented. 5. They were not attacking the tax law. 6. They were not trying to compete with anyone. 7. They were not discrediting anyone’s work. 8. KPMG supports the tax reform. 9. They are saying big tax reforms always come with issues. 10. They are saying errors are normal in large reforms. 11. They are saying errors can be corrected after enactment. 12. They are saying a law being passed does not make it perfect or sacred. 13. They are saying Nigeria’s tax law must fit Nigeria’s reality, not copied blindly. 14. They are saying copy-and-paste tax laws can damage the economy. 15. They are saying some provisions can scare investors. 16. They are saying bad tax design can cause capital flight. 17. They are saying investors have options and can leave Nigeria. 18. They are saying Nigeria is not the only place investors can invest. 19. They are saying corporate tax rates must be competitive. 20. They are saying if taxes are too heavy, companies may exit Nigeria. 21. They are saying the direct transfer of shares tax, if not carefully applied, can discourage foreign investors, especially considering Nigeria’s current stage of development. 22. They are saying some countries do it, but Nigeria must ask if it is right for us now. 23. They are saying the Nigerian government needs revenue, but also needs investment. 24. They are saying revenue drive should not destroy investment inflow. 25. They are saying unclear laws create disputes with tax authorities. 26. They are saying disputes lead to long court cases. 27. They are saying long disputes delay government revenue. 28. They are saying laws must be written in simple and clear language. 29. They are saying clarity reduces misinterpretation and litigation. 30. They are saying early clarification builds trust in the tax system. 31. They are saying confidence in tax law is critical for compliance. 32. They are saying public discussion of the tax law is good. 33. They are saying misrepresentation and misinformation are the real danger. 34. They acknowledged the reform is transformational. 35. They agreed a great job was done, but the law needed to be written with Nigeria’s context in mind.

DonAza

54,954 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Banning books is a SLIPPERY SLOPE. The King James Bible has been removed from ALL elementary and middle school libraries throughout the Davis School District in Utah after someone challenged its contents. The school district decided to ban the bible after they found that it has "elements of vulgarity and violence not suitable to younger students." A broad new law in Utah prohibits schools from having "pornographic or indecent material". So I want to hear your opinions. Should the bible be banned? If not, then why shouldn't it? Here are my thoughts. Books in school libraries should be segmented by age- appropriateness, if they are not already. Laws should be written to narrowly focus on really bad content, not in the broad way they currently are. Broad laws leave teachers and librarians in a position that makes them fear the laws and overreact rather than uphold the laws in a genuine manner. Should a 7 year-old be reading 'Gender Queer'? Of course not? But should a 7-Year-old also be reading the vulgar sections of the bible? No. There are happy-mediums to this problem and it doesn't involve painting all people, who think certain books should be accessible to older students, as "groomers," just like those who think the bible should be accessible to kids shouldn't be called "groomers" either.

Banning books is a SLIPPERY SLOPE. The King James Bible has been removed from ALL elementary and middle school libraries throughout the Davis School District in Utah after someone challenged its contents. The school district decided to ban the bible after they found that it has "elements of vulgarity and violence not suitable to younger students." A broad new law in Utah prohibits schools from having "pornographic or indecent material". So I want to hear your opinions. Should the bible be banned? If not, then why shouldn't it? Here are my thoughts. Books in school libraries should be segmented by age- appropriateness, if they are not already. Laws should be written to narrowly focus on really bad content, not in the broad way they currently are. Broad laws leave teachers and librarians in a position that makes them fear the laws and overreact rather than uphold the laws in a genuine manner. Should a 7 year-old be reading 'Gender Queer'? Of course not? But should a 7-Year-old also be reading the vulgar sections of the bible? No. There are happy-mediums to this problem and it doesn't involve painting all people, who think certain books should be accessible to older students, as "groomers," just like those who think the bible should be accessible to kids shouldn't be called "groomers" either.

Brian Krassenstein

1,862,790 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

UPDATE: Radioactive Material in New Jersey - a Second Threat? (R) New Jersey Mayor, Michael Melham Confirms there was a New Threat that Came in through Port Newark, Involving Possibly Radioactive Material — And now we are Protecting Critical Infrastructure Facilities When asked about a source at the Pentagon saying the Drones have something to do with Radioactive material, he responded by saying he believes they’re looking for something, and he’s aware of possibly two radioactive threats: 1st Threat: We currently have assets over our critical infrastructure, watching and looking… we are aware of a threat that came in through Port Newark, that may be radioactive material. 2nd Threat: There was and is an alert that’s out now stating that radioactive material went missing in New Jersey around December 2nd. Context of 2nd threat: The second “threat”, He is talking about a recent U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission report that went out December 2. —— this was for a GE-68 Pin Source for a Eckert and Ziegler Model HEGL-0132, which is utilized to calibrate PET scanner systems… which contains a very small amount of radioactive material and can cause little to no permanent injury. So If the contents of the 2nd threat are true… it’s not a threat, unless they’re lying about what went missing. The 1st threat however is something new… and previously not known. 🔴 Additional Info. On a Private call with all the mayors of New Jersey and the White House, they were being told they are crazy, they are seeing things… But there’s supposedly a “Top-Secret” briefing going on currently in Congress about this. He says Donald Trump gets the same exact intelligence briefings that Joe Biden gets… and Trump says the Government and Joe Biden knows, but he’s staying out of Bedminster this weekend. I really don’t like where this is all going…

UPDATE: Radioactive Material in New Jersey - a Second Threat? (R) New Jersey Mayor, Michael Melham Confirms there was a New Threat that Came in through Port Newark, Involving Possibly Radioactive Material — And now we are Protecting Critical Infrastructure Facilities When asked about a source at the Pentagon saying the Drones have something to do with Radioactive material, he responded by saying he believes they’re looking for something, and he’s aware of possibly two radioactive threats: 1st Threat: We currently have assets over our critical infrastructure, watching and looking… we are aware of a threat that came in through Port Newark, that may be radioactive material. 2nd Threat: There was and is an alert that’s out now stating that radioactive material went missing in New Jersey around December 2nd. Context of 2nd threat: The second “threat”, He is talking about a recent U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission report that went out December 2. —— this was for a GE-68 Pin Source for a Eckert and Ziegler Model HEGL-0132, which is utilized to calibrate PET scanner systems… which contains a very small amount of radioactive material and can cause little to no permanent injury. So If the contents of the 2nd threat are true… it’s not a threat, unless they’re lying about what went missing. The 1st threat however is something new… and previously not known. 🔴 Additional Info. On a Private call with all the mayors of New Jersey and the White House, they were being told they are crazy, they are seeing things… But there’s supposedly a “Top-Secret” briefing going on currently in Congress about this. He says Donald Trump gets the same exact intelligence briefings that Joe Biden gets… and Trump says the Government and Joe Biden knows, but he’s staying out of Bedminster this weekend. I really don’t like where this is all going…

MJTruthUltra

165,234 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Policies trained on real robot data via imitation can be surprisingly capable. But for domains like dexterous manipulation, they are often not quite good enough: they move slowly, miss grasps, make unreliable contact, and fail under small perturbations. Can we improve them without any additional data collection on the real robot? In SCORE, we show that we can improve real-world diffusion/flow policies cheaply by using simulation to simply learn how to steer them on deployment. This leads to large gains in real-world success and speed across a variety of tasks, without requiring additional real-world experience: 🧵 (1/10)

Policies trained on real robot data via imitation can be surprisingly capable. But for domains like dexterous manipulation, they are often not quite good enough: they move slowly, miss grasps, make unreliable contact, and fail under small perturbations. Can we improve them without any additional data collection on the real robot? In SCORE, we show that we can improve real-world diffusion/flow policies cheaply by using simulation to simply learn how to steer them on deployment. This leads to large gains in real-world success and speed across a variety of tasks, without requiring additional real-world experience: 🧵 (1/10)

Abhishek Gupta

33,950 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

🚨Did you know that fructose can fuel cancer by hijacking your liver? (🔗 at end) 1/5) It sounds dramatic, but new research - published in nature has uncovered a chilling new connection between fructose and cancer growth. And it’s not just about sugar making us gain weight; the effects are far deeper and more direct. 🧵Let me break it down. But first, background… High fructose diets are already associated with increased risks of certain cancer, like pancreatic cancer. And there are many known mechanisms whereby fructose can support cancer growth and survival. 🤨But I particularly like these new data, because they reveal just how sneaky cancer can be, effectively hijacking the liver for its own purposes

🚨Did you know that fructose can fuel cancer by hijacking your liver? (🔗 at end) 1/5) It sounds dramatic, but new research - published in nature has uncovered a chilling new connection between fructose and cancer growth. And it’s not just about sugar making us gain weight; the effects are far deeper and more direct. 🧵Let me break it down. But first, background… High fructose diets are already associated with increased risks of certain cancer, like pancreatic cancer. And there are many known mechanisms whereby fructose can support cancer growth and survival. 🤨But I particularly like these new data, because they reveal just how sneaky cancer can be, effectively hijacking the liver for its own purposes

Nick Norwitz MD PhD

49,038 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

2025 Uncommitted Matthew Evans popped up when looking at ‘25 data. Might not fit into our T75 update but he isn’t anywhere close to where he should be ranked by other orgs. Smaller frame but uber athletic. 6.4 runner who can run it up to 91 across the diamond. Glove/feet look like they can stick up the middle. At the plate he was one of the top performing ‘25 bats in the summer/fall of ‘23. Slashed .467/.525/.638. Good get for any school! #theanalyst ⚗️🧪 Matthew Evans Home Plate

2025 Uncommitted Matthew Evans popped up when looking at ‘25 data. Might not fit into our T75 update but he isn’t anywhere close to where he should be ranked by other orgs. Smaller frame but uber athletic. 6.4 runner who can run it up to 91 across the diamond. Glove/feet look like they can stick up the middle. At the plate he was one of the top performing ‘25 bats in the summer/fall of ‘23. Slashed .467/.525/.638. Good get for any school! #theanalyst ⚗️🧪 Matthew Evans Home Plate

Draft Analyst

14,183 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The manosphere’s most effective recruiting tool is the discovery that adults did not tell boys the whole truth about women. One reason young guys are drawn to the manosphere is that some of the information they find there is not really offered anywhere else. And some of it is directionally accurate. One thing these guys will say is that women are trained from a young age to be aware of what men can be like. "Men only want one thing, you have to be careful around guys, etc." And so, once girls hit puberty, they have this ambient awareness that men have certain motives and that they should keep their guard up. Boys, by contrast, are not always told the complete truth about what women can be like. They grow up thinking women are like Disney princesses who want nothing but kindness and generosity and empathy. Then a boy enters high school and sees the kinds of guys many girls are actually drawn to. Often it is not the super nice guy. Sometimes it's the bully, or the jock, or the guy who seems dominant and socially confident. If you are not prepared for that, and you are a naive teenage boy, the realization can send you in a very dark direction. You start thinking, “I have been lied to about women my whole life. What else have I been lied to about?” And from there, it is easy to conclude that there is an entire matrix of hidden truths you now need to see through and only the online influencers will show you the way.

Sensitive content

The manosphere’s most effective recruiting tool is the discovery that adults did not tell boys the whole truth about women. One reason young guys are drawn to the manosphere is that some of the information they find there is not really offered anywhere else. And some of it is directionally accurate. One thing these guys will say is that women are trained from a young age to be aware of what men can be like. "Men only want one thing, you have to be careful around guys, etc." And so, once girls hit puberty, they have this ambient awareness that men have certain motives and that they should keep their guard up. Boys, by contrast, are not always told the complete truth about what women can be like. They grow up thinking women are like Disney princesses who want nothing but kindness and generosity and empathy. Then a boy enters high school and sees the kinds of guys many girls are actually drawn to. Often it is not the super nice guy. Sometimes it's the bully, or the jock, or the guy who seems dominant and socially confident. If you are not prepared for that, and you are a naive teenage boy, the realization can send you in a very dark direction. You start thinking, “I have been lied to about women my whole life. What else have I been lied to about?” And from there, it is easy to conclude that there is an entire matrix of hidden truths you now need to see through and only the online influencers will show you the way.

Rob Henderson

205,732 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

INTRODUCING: STEGG!!! 🥚🦕🥚 This isn't your average steganography tool... This is a full suite with multiple modalities, designed to push the limits of what's possible with data smuggling! It's super easy to use while still offering advanced users all the bells and whistles they could ask for, and then some. You can upload a wide range of file types (images and audio for now, video coming soon) and hide whatever data you like using a variety of encryption methods. You can even hide entire files within files! By default, you have an encode, decode, and analyze tab. In plain terms, one is for hiding data, one is for extracting data, and one is for shining a light on it from all angles (which is helpful for identifying hidden bits that the smart decoder feature misses). Steganography can be used for a wide variety of practical applications: > watermarking and fingerprinting > data exfil > botnet activation/signaling > covert channels > malware C&C > puzzles/ARGs > and more! 🤫 Pssst...I've also hidden a number of Easter Steggs on the site that activate hidden features (some involving novel steg techniques) for those seekers willing to put in the effort to discover them! 🐇 And the entire site was vibe-coded in collaboration w/ Opus-4.5 🤗 Thanks fren! No data is being stored and it's totally free to use. 🫶 Hope y'all enjoy! ☺️

INTRODUCING: STEGG!!! 🥚🦕🥚 This isn't your average steganography tool... This is a full suite with multiple modalities, designed to push the limits of what's possible with data smuggling! It's super easy to use while still offering advanced users all the bells and whistles they could ask for, and then some. You can upload a wide range of file types (images and audio for now, video coming soon) and hide whatever data you like using a variety of encryption methods. You can even hide entire files within files! By default, you have an encode, decode, and analyze tab. In plain terms, one is for hiding data, one is for extracting data, and one is for shining a light on it from all angles (which is helpful for identifying hidden bits that the smart decoder feature misses). Steganography can be used for a wide variety of practical applications: > watermarking and fingerprinting > data exfil > botnet activation/signaling > covert channels > malware C&C > puzzles/ARGs > and more! 🤫 Pssst...I've also hidden a number of Easter Steggs on the site that activate hidden features (some involving novel steg techniques) for those seekers willing to put in the effort to discover them! 🐇 And the entire site was vibe-coded in collaboration w/ Opus-4.5 🤗 Thanks fren! No data is being stored and it's totally free to use. 🫶 Hope y'all enjoy! ☺️

Pliny the Liberator 🐉󠅫󠄼󠄿󠅆󠄵󠄐󠅀󠄼󠄹󠄾󠅉󠅭

91,962 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

BANNING U16s FROM SOCIAL MEDIA 📱 ❌ It may sound a great idea… but here’s why it isn’t. 1. The ban in Australia hasn’t worked and polls show 60% kids admit still being able to access social media. 2. Technology exists to stop kids doing things like sending nudes, viewing harmful material etc, Keir Starmer has resisted its use - why ? Because he wants a ban for political reasons. 3. We should not have Government’s dictating our lives, what legal material and political views that we can view and what we can’t. That’s very North Korea. 4. They want 16 year olds to vote, how can they understand the full picture when our BBC, SKY etc are so biased towards the left and woke nonsense. Don’t get me started on left wing teachers indoctrinating kids too…

BANNING U16s FROM SOCIAL MEDIA 📱 ❌ It may sound a great idea… but here’s why it isn’t. 1. The ban in Australia hasn’t worked and polls show 60% kids admit still being able to access social media. 2. Technology exists to stop kids doing things like sending nudes, viewing harmful material etc, Keir Starmer has resisted its use - why ? Because he wants a ban for political reasons. 3. We should not have Government’s dictating our lives, what legal material and political views that we can view and what we can’t. That’s very North Korea. 4. They want 16 year olds to vote, how can they understand the full picture when our BBC, SKY etc are so biased towards the left and woke nonsense. Don’t get me started on left wing teachers indoctrinating kids too…

Adam Brooks AKA EssexPR 🇬🇧

21,841 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

ELON MUSK: DON’T TAKE ANYONE’S OPINION….GO TO THE SOURCE MATERIAL AND COMMUNITY NOTES TO SEE WHAT REALLY HAPPENED As soon as any company steps out of line and is willing to actually have the truth debated on their platform, it forces the other platforms to allow things to be more truthful, to not censor. Because their censorship becomes glaringly obvious And, you know, the best thing I found as a rebuttal, like if somebody, if there's a hoax, is just go to the source material. You know, if you think if somebody thinks, you know, it's, you know, Trump said that we should put Liz Cheney in a firing squad, I'm like, let me send you a link to X so you can watch his video. That's the best way. Don't take my opinion for it. Don't take anyone's opinion for it. Go to the source material and Community Notes Yes, and Community Notes is awesome. It's incredible because everybody gets checked, including me. And with Community Notes, all the software is open source, and all the data is open source, so you can recreate any given note independently. That's amazing. Yeah. That's how it should be. Total absolute transparency in every way Sometimes I get asked like, 'Elon, can you remove a note?' You know, mostly by the left, but sometimes by the right. I'm like, I don't even remove notes on my own account. Nothing. And, and by the way, everything is totally open. So if I did that, it would stick out like a sore thumb immediately. Like it's not going to be subtle That is the best counter to misinformation. Yes, absolutely. Like let everybody look at it and say, 'Okay, here's what the actual facts say.' Yes, exactly. The counter to misinformation is better information Not just that, but having it checked in real-time by the community. So you have millions of people that can go over it and debate whether or not this is true or that's true. Yes, and, and like I said, the best way to understand the truth of things is don't take anyone's opinion for it. Look at the source material Look at what someone actually said, look at what someone actually did, look at the real videos of the situation, and then you'll actually know what's real

ELON MUSK: DON’T TAKE ANYONE’S OPINION….GO TO THE SOURCE MATERIAL AND COMMUNITY NOTES TO SEE WHAT REALLY HAPPENED As soon as any company steps out of line and is willing to actually have the truth debated on their platform, it forces the other platforms to allow things to be more truthful, to not censor. Because their censorship becomes glaringly obvious And, you know, the best thing I found as a rebuttal, like if somebody, if there's a hoax, is just go to the source material. You know, if you think if somebody thinks, you know, it's, you know, Trump said that we should put Liz Cheney in a firing squad, I'm like, let me send you a link to X so you can watch his video. That's the best way. Don't take my opinion for it. Don't take anyone's opinion for it. Go to the source material and Community Notes Yes, and Community Notes is awesome. It's incredible because everybody gets checked, including me. And with Community Notes, all the software is open source, and all the data is open source, so you can recreate any given note independently. That's amazing. Yeah. That's how it should be. Total absolute transparency in every way Sometimes I get asked like, 'Elon, can you remove a note?' You know, mostly by the left, but sometimes by the right. I'm like, I don't even remove notes on my own account. Nothing. And, and by the way, everything is totally open. So if I did that, it would stick out like a sore thumb immediately. Like it's not going to be subtle That is the best counter to misinformation. Yes, absolutely. Like let everybody look at it and say, 'Okay, here's what the actual facts say.' Yes, exactly. The counter to misinformation is better information Not just that, but having it checked in real-time by the community. So you have millions of people that can go over it and debate whether or not this is true or that's true. Yes, and, and like I said, the best way to understand the truth of things is don't take anyone's opinion for it. Look at the source material Look at what someone actually said, look at what someone actually did, look at the real videos of the situation, and then you'll actually know what's real

X Freeze

589,152 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨ELON MUSK ON RIDICULOUS REGULATIONS 😂😂 "SpaceX had to do a study to see if Starship would hit a shark. I'm like "It's a big ocean, there's a lot of sharks. It's not impossible, but it's very unlikely." OK fine, we'll do it, but we need the data, can you give us the Shark data? They said no. They said they could give the data to their Western division but they don't trust them. We're like, 'Is this a comedy?' Eventually we got the data, and the sharks were going to be fine. We thought we were done. But then they hit us with: 'Well, what about whales?" When you look at the Pacific, how many whales do you see? Honestly, if we did hit a whale, the whale had it coming, because the odds are so low. It's like Final Destination: whale edition. So then we had to do the WHALE analysis. It goes on and on. They said, what if the rocket goes underwater and explodes and the whales get hearing damage? Umm, If we could make a rocket go underwater and become a submarine, that would be a feat of physics that we could not accomplish. It's just one crazy thing after another. So yes, I really feel the pain of Government overregulation."

🚨ELON MUSK ON RIDICULOUS REGULATIONS 😂😂 "SpaceX had to do a study to see if Starship would hit a shark. I'm like "It's a big ocean, there's a lot of sharks. It's not impossible, but it's very unlikely." OK fine, we'll do it, but we need the data, can you give us the Shark data? They said no. They said they could give the data to their Western division but they don't trust them. We're like, 'Is this a comedy?' Eventually we got the data, and the sharks were going to be fine. We thought we were done. But then they hit us with: 'Well, what about whales?" When you look at the Pacific, how many whales do you see? Honestly, if we did hit a whale, the whale had it coming, because the odds are so low. It's like Final Destination: whale edition. So then we had to do the WHALE analysis. It goes on and on. They said, what if the rocket goes underwater and explodes and the whales get hearing damage? Umm, If we could make a rocket go underwater and become a submarine, that would be a feat of physics that we could not accomplish. It's just one crazy thing after another. So yes, I really feel the pain of Government overregulation."

Autism Capital 🧩

18,322,119 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

#นิวบอยซอย7xฟรีนเบค #Beckysangels | #BeckyArmstrong‌ [Becky Interview Clip – Subtitles En/中] 🧚‍♀️: I started from Thailand’s Got Talent when I was thirteen. That was my very first dream — I wanted to be a singer. Yes, I loved singing. I still do. Actually, even before Thailand’s Got Talent, I tried The Voice and other countries’ Got Talent shows too — it’s just that no videos ever came out. Everything’s been kept hidden, hidden, hidden. Just hidden. So… none of that ever got released, but it was like…Sigh… and I got rejected so many times. So many that I started to wonder: “Hmm… maybe being a singer isn’t my destiny?” So I went back to focusing on my studies. But deep down, I still loved that…That part of me. Every time I saw an audition opportunity — whether for singing, modeling, or anything — I’d always feel like giving it a try. But auditions are really exhausting. They really are. It’s like a whole day, super tiring, and sometimes you don’t even get a response. I really respect people who keep going and keep auditioning, because honestly… It’s not easy at all. It’s about chasing dreams, but I still feel small, like there’s a lot of growing to do, and the road ahead is still long. There are so many different paths I can still explore. Becky Armstrong

#นิวบอยซอย7xฟรีนเบค #Beckysangels | #BeckyArmstrong‌ [Becky Interview Clip – Subtitles En/中] 🧚‍♀️: I started from Thailand’s Got Talent when I was thirteen. That was my very first dream — I wanted to be a singer. Yes, I loved singing. I still do. Actually, even before Thailand’s Got Talent, I tried The Voice and other countries’ Got Talent shows too — it’s just that no videos ever came out. Everything’s been kept hidden, hidden, hidden. Just hidden. So… none of that ever got released, but it was like…Sigh… and I got rejected so many times. So many that I started to wonder: “Hmm… maybe being a singer isn’t my destiny?” So I went back to focusing on my studies. But deep down, I still loved that…That part of me. Every time I saw an audition opportunity — whether for singing, modeling, or anything — I’d always feel like giving it a try. But auditions are really exhausting. They really are. It’s like a whole day, super tiring, and sometimes you don’t even get a response. I really respect people who keep going and keep auditioning, because honestly… It’s not easy at all. It’s about chasing dreams, but I still feel small, like there’s a lot of growing to do, and the road ahead is still long. There are so many different paths I can still explore. Becky Armstrong

alimiaomiaomiao💛🪽

13,166 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Yellowstone creator Taylor Sheridan perfectly encapsulates how the left’s refusal to accept Donald Trump as president is actively eroding the rule of law. He warns that they are setting a very dangerous precedent for the future of America. SHERIDAN: “It’s so dangerous what we’re seeing.” “You can like Trump or not like Trump, it doesn’t...people are going to like presidents and dislike presidents.” “But now, defying the rule of law because he happens to be the head of the federal government and openly defying the government.” “The repercussions of that are going to be, okay, fine, you can’t stand this man, you think he’s a terrible president and you’re not going to follow his laws.” “But that’s the new normal now.” “So when a president gets in that you do support, then the other side — because we’ve established this precedent — they’re just not going to follow his laws either.” “And now we’ve eroded the rule of law.” “And then what happens?”

Yellowstone creator Taylor Sheridan perfectly encapsulates how the left’s refusal to accept Donald Trump as president is actively eroding the rule of law. He warns that they are setting a very dangerous precedent for the future of America. SHERIDAN: “It’s so dangerous what we’re seeing.” “You can like Trump or not like Trump, it doesn’t...people are going to like presidents and dislike presidents.” “But now, defying the rule of law because he happens to be the head of the federal government and openly defying the government.” “The repercussions of that are going to be, okay, fine, you can’t stand this man, you think he’s a terrible president and you’re not going to follow his laws.” “But that’s the new normal now.” “So when a president gets in that you do support, then the other side — because we’ve established this precedent — they’re just not going to follow his laws either.” “And now we’ve eroded the rule of law.” “And then what happens?”

Overton

374,716 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Elon Musk tonight on overregulation: "I got a bunch of nutty stories. SpaceX had to do this study to see if Starship would hit a shark. And I'm like... it's a big ocean. There are a lot of sharks! It’s not impossible, but it’s very unlikely. So we said, 'Fine, we’ll do the analysis. Can you give us the shark data?' They were like, 'No, we can’t give you the shark data.' Well, then, okay, we’re in a bit of a quandary. How do we solve this shark probability issue? They said, 'Well, we could give it to our western division, but we don’t trust them.' I’m like, 'Am I in a comedy sketch here?!' Eventually, we got the data and could run the analysis to say, 'Yeah, the sharks are going to be fine.' But they wouldn’t let us proceed with the launch until we did this crazy shark analysis. Then we thought, 'Okay, now we’re done.' But then they said, 'What about whales?' When you look at a picture of the Pacific, what percent of the surface area do you see as whale? If Starship did hit a whale, honestly, it’s like the whale had it coming, cause the odds are... so low. It’s like Final Destination: Whale Edition. And then they said, 'What if the rocket goes underwater, then explodes, and the whales have hearing damage?' This is real!

Elon Musk tonight on overregulation: "I got a bunch of nutty stories. SpaceX had to do this study to see if Starship would hit a shark. And I'm like... it's a big ocean. There are a lot of sharks! It’s not impossible, but it’s very unlikely. So we said, 'Fine, we’ll do the analysis. Can you give us the shark data?' They were like, 'No, we can’t give you the shark data.' Well, then, okay, we’re in a bit of a quandary. How do we solve this shark probability issue? They said, 'Well, we could give it to our western division, but we don’t trust them.' I’m like, 'Am I in a comedy sketch here?!' Eventually, we got the data and could run the analysis to say, 'Yeah, the sharks are going to be fine.' But they wouldn’t let us proceed with the launch until we did this crazy shark analysis. Then we thought, 'Okay, now we’re done.' But then they said, 'What about whales?' When you look at a picture of the Pacific, what percent of the surface area do you see as whale? If Starship did hit a whale, honestly, it’s like the whale had it coming, cause the odds are... so low. It’s like Final Destination: Whale Edition. And then they said, 'What if the rocket goes underwater, then explodes, and the whales have hearing damage?' This is real!

Sawyer Merritt

2,468,290 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr