Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

SHOCKING Ballot SECRETS: Forensic Experts UNCOVER Print Shop Differences! I summarise claims from forensic examiners who say ballot paper and ink analysis revealed prints from different shops — suggesting some ballots didn’t originate from authorized printers. The allegations go further, claiming attempts were made to destroy materials tied to... show more

Patrick Byrne

442,861 subscribers

29,734 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 PATRICK BYRNE DROPS DETROIT ELECTION BOMBSHELL 🚨 Patrick Byrne says new findings out of Detroit raise major questions about mail-in ballots, envelopes, and election machine access. According to Byrne, some precincts allegedly had more ballots than envelopes - while others had more envelopes than ballots. He also claimed up to 33% of mail-in ballots in Detroit may have had no matching request on record. “Mail-in ballots came in from people who had never asked for a mail-in ballot. What’s that sound like?” Byrne also pointed to testimony from Michigan election official Jonathan Brater, who he says acknowledged VPN access into voting machines - raising the obvious question: If there was VPN access, were the machines connected? This is why transparency matters. Paper ballots. Full audits. No black boxes.

🚨 PATRICK BYRNE DROPS DETROIT ELECTION BOMBSHELL 🚨 Patrick Byrne says new findings out of Detroit raise major questions about mail-in ballots, envelopes, and election machine access. According to Byrne, some precincts allegedly had more ballots than envelopes - while others had more envelopes than ballots. He also claimed up to 33% of mail-in ballots in Detroit may have had no matching request on record. “Mail-in ballots came in from people who had never asked for a mail-in ballot. What’s that sound like?” Byrne also pointed to testimony from Michigan election official Jonathan Brater, who he says acknowledged VPN access into voting machines - raising the obvious question: If there was VPN access, were the machines connected? This is why transparency matters. Paper ballots. Full audits. No black boxes.

LindellTV

20,813 views • 2 months ago

$Fulton County, GA admitted in federal court that the majority of in-person ballot images from the 2020 Election machine count were not preserved. Statewide, around 1.7 million ballot images were destroyed and 132,286 of 148,318 absentee-ballot cryptographic authentication files were deleted, removing the capability to prove if ballots were altered. Fulton County, GA's 17,852 recount votes have no corresponding ballot image. 20,713 ballots came from tabulators with no provenance. 3,930 ballots were scanned and counted more than once. Georgia's certified presidential margin was 12,670 votes. Maricopa County, AZ had 263,139 ballot images that were corrupt and 21,273 were missing. Up to ten non-compliant paper stocks drove an 11.2% adjudication rate, roughly ten times the 2016 baseline. In Detroit, MI, tens of thousands of ballots arrived at the TCF Center at roughly 3:30 AM with no chain-of-custody documentation. A Speckin Forensics sample found up to 20% of absentee ballots lacked the legally required application, the document that authorizes issuance and ties a ballot to a specific registered voter. Delaware County, PA had sworn testimony that named officials that physically tore machine tapes and return sheets into pieces and placed them in the trash. In Pennsylvania statewide, 440,781 mail ballots are classified in federal EAVS data as "status unknown." The state has no record of whether they were delivered, returned, counted, rejected, or disposed of. The certified margin was 81,660 votes; the unaccounted-for volume exceeds the margin by more than 5:1. In Milwaukee, WI, a USB drive holding absentee voter data for more than 120,000 votes briefly lost chain of custody on election night, during the same window as an unexplained 143,379-vote batch upload reported at 3:26 AM. Fulton County, GA had 35 tabulator memory cards were swapped mid-election with no chain-of-custody documentation, and closing tapes were printed on surrogate machines rather than the actual scanners. Industry-wide design feature scanners use a documented "color dropout" function that deletes red-ink markings such as "TEST" or "VOID" from the digital ballot image. This is just a small fraction of the thousands of instances of fraud found in the 2020 Election.$

Fulton County, GA admitted in federal court that the majority of in-person ballot images from the 2020 Election machine count were not preserved. Statewide, around 1.7 million ballot images were destroyed and 132,286 of 148,318 absentee-ballot cryptographic authentication files were deleted, removing the capability to prove if ballots were altered. Fulton County, GA's 17,852 recount votes have no corresponding ballot image. 20,713 ballots came from tabulators with no provenance. 3,930 ballots were scanned and counted more than once. Georgia's certified presidential margin was 12,670 votes. Maricopa County, AZ had 263,139 ballot images that were corrupt and 21,273 were missing. Up to ten non-compliant paper stocks drove an 11.2% adjudication rate, roughly ten times the 2016 baseline. In Detroit, MI, tens of thousands of ballots arrived at the TCF Center at roughly 3:30 AM with no chain-of-custody documentation. A Speckin Forensics sample found up to 20% of absentee ballots lacked the legally required application, the document that authorizes issuance and ties a ballot to a specific registered voter. Delaware County, PA had sworn testimony that named officials that physically tore machine tapes and return sheets into pieces and placed them in the trash. In Pennsylvania statewide, 440,781 mail ballots are classified in federal EAVS data as "status unknown." The state has no record of whether they were delivered, returned, counted, rejected, or disposed of. The certified margin was 81,660 votes; the unaccounted-for volume exceeds the margin by more than 5:1. In Milwaukee, WI, a USB drive holding absentee voter data for more than 120,000 votes briefly lost chain of custody on election night, during the same window as an unexplained 143,379-vote batch upload reported at 3:26 AM. Fulton County, GA had 35 tabulator memory cards were swapped mid-election with no chain-of-custody documentation, and closing tapes were printed on surrogate machines rather than the actual scanners. Industry-wide design feature scanners use a documented "color dropout" function that deletes red-ink markings such as "TEST" or "VOID" from the digital ballot image. This is just a small fraction of the thousands of instances of fraud found in the 2020 Election.

The SCIF

28,400 views • 2 days ago

Experts in Georgia's 2020 election found over 96,000 mail-in ballots were recorded as voted but were never recorded as returned to actually be counted. They also found mail-in ballots received back and counted on the exact same day they were mailed out. THOUSANDS of mail-in ballots were also poured into Detroit's 2020 election with NO chain-of-custody that could not be verified with poll books. These ballots were mixed with other ballots and counted. Most of these ballots turned out to be from deceased voters or voters whose address turned out to be vacant lots and burnt down houses. Election experts ended up discovering astronomical 2020 election fraud with the combination of mail-in ballots and Dominion software. They found that it was very easy to assign a mail-in ballot to a voter through the software. In Dallas they found over 57,000 votes were tampered with after being received back and recorded by the state. Their analysis found likely fraudulent rejection rates that were extremely low compared to the previous years, yet having a way higher mail-in ballot count, meaning they were passing fraudulent ballots through the system. 2016: 199,356 mail-in ballots 6.4% rejection rate 2020: 1,320,154 mail-in ballots with .2% rejection rate

Experts in Georgia's 2020 election found over 96,000 mail-in ballots were recorded as voted but were never recorded as returned to actually be counted. They also found mail-in ballots received back and counted on the exact same day they were mailed out. THOUSANDS of mail-in ballots were also poured into Detroit's 2020 election with NO chain-of-custody that could not be verified with poll books. These ballots were mixed with other ballots and counted. Most of these ballots turned out to be from deceased voters or voters whose address turned out to be vacant lots and burnt down houses. Election experts ended up discovering astronomical 2020 election fraud with the combination of mail-in ballots and Dominion software. They found that it was very easy to assign a mail-in ballot to a voter through the software. In Dallas they found over 57,000 votes were tampered with after being received back and recorded by the state. Their analysis found likely fraudulent rejection rates that were extremely low compared to the previous years, yet having a way higher mail-in ballot count, meaning they were passing fraudulent ballots through the system. 2016: 199,356 mail-in ballots 6.4% rejection rate 2020: 1,320,154 mail-in ballots with .2% rejection rate

The SCIF

71,350 views • 4 months ago

🚨 BREAKING — TEXAS 02/24/26 Video Williamson Co. Republicans showed up at Commissioners Court today to demand answers about an unauthorized joint primary election — with commingled R and D ballots in the same boxes, combined voter check-in, unauthorized ballot marking devices, wrong ballots, and concerns about ballot chain of custody as cameras go dark and clocks skip ahead. EA Bridgette Escobedo is exercising powers the law reserves for a joint primary agreement that there is no evidence the Commissioners Court ever authorized. WilCo Republicans packed Commissioners Court demanding answers about a primary election that doesn't match the law, the contract, or this court's own records. Republican and Democratic voter registration and ballot boxes are COMMINGLED — with Democrats running the Republican primary. There is no evidence the Commissioners Court voted to authorize a joint primary under §172.126(a). Their own minutes from the only primary-related agenda item state: "No action was taken on this item." Yet every operational element of this election matches a joint primary. What WilCo Republican voters are experiencing right now: 🔴 Commingled R and D database, equipment, and ballot boxes 🔴 Combined voter check-in — one system, both parties 🔴 Ballot marking devices the CEC and CC never adopted or approved as required by §123.001(b)(2) 🔴 A "Federal" ballot showing only 2 races instead of the full Republican primary 🔴 Democratic co-clerks steering Republicans to electronic marking devices 🔴 Concerns about ballot chain of custody camera coverage and manipulation Republican voters were steered toward an unauthorized "Federal" ballot programmed onto the machines — giving them only 2 races instead of the full primary ballot. Down-ballot Republican candidates never appeared on these ballots. The SOS Director of Elections has reportedly acknowledged this ballot was not supposed to be accessible to in-person voters. How many voters were affected? The commissioners unanimously approved spending over $1 MILLION to move to hand-marked paper ballots. Instead, dozens of ExpressVote barcode machines were deployed at nearly every early voting location and — according to our County Chair — workers were instructed to offer and encourage electronic voting. The only known contract is a §31.093 separate primary — which says in its own text that the EA "may not prevent" the county chair from supervising the election. But the EA selected the voting system, programmed the ballot format, chose the locations, conducted all training, and established all procedures — powers that under the Election Code belong only to the county clerk (or EA if County has one) in a §172.126 joint primary. Then EA ignored the County Chair when she called foul. Why does the framework matter? Under a separate primary agreement, the Republican Party independently oversees its own election. Under a joint primary agreement, the county EA and Commissioners take control of everything. When ballots are commingled, check-in is combined, and workers are shared — the party loses all ability to protect the security and purity of our election nor can independently verify its own primary results. Today I called on the Commissioners Court to: ✅ Convene a special session on the primary framework If we got more than 2:50 seconds, ask to: Direct the EA to identify her specific statutory authority — on the record ✅ Separate the scanners, ballot boxes, voter lists, and check-in immediately ✅ Remove the unauthorized BMDs and unauthorized ballot format ✅ Refer the matter for investigation Once R and D ballots are commingled without authorization, the security and purity of the ballot box is destroyed — and it cannot be restored. Neither party can independently verify its own ballots are legal. That's not a procedural issue. That's a constitutional violation under Article VI, §4 of the Texas Constitution. We're asking questions that deserve answers. 🇺🇸

🚨 BREAKING — TEXAS 02/24/26 Video Williamson Co. Republicans showed up at Commissioners Court today to demand answers about an unauthorized joint primary election — with commingled R and D ballots in the same boxes, combined voter check-in, unauthorized ballot marking devices, wrong ballots, and concerns about ballot chain of custody as cameras go dark and clocks skip ahead. EA Bridgette Escobedo is exercising powers the law reserves for a joint primary agreement that there is no evidence the Commissioners Court ever authorized. WilCo Republicans packed Commissioners Court demanding answers about a primary election that doesn't match the law, the contract, or this court's own records. Republican and Democratic voter registration and ballot boxes are COMMINGLED — with Democrats running the Republican primary. There is no evidence the Commissioners Court voted to authorize a joint primary under §172.126(a). Their own minutes from the only primary-related agenda item state: "No action was taken on this item." Yet every operational element of this election matches a joint primary. What WilCo Republican voters are experiencing right now: 🔴 Commingled R and D database, equipment, and ballot boxes 🔴 Combined voter check-in — one system, both parties 🔴 Ballot marking devices the CEC and CC never adopted or approved as required by §123.001(b)(2) 🔴 A "Federal" ballot showing only 2 races instead of the full Republican primary 🔴 Democratic co-clerks steering Republicans to electronic marking devices 🔴 Concerns about ballot chain of custody camera coverage and manipulation Republican voters were steered toward an unauthorized "Federal" ballot programmed onto the machines — giving them only 2 races instead of the full primary ballot. Down-ballot Republican candidates never appeared on these ballots. The SOS Director of Elections has reportedly acknowledged this ballot was not supposed to be accessible to in-person voters. How many voters were affected? The commissioners unanimously approved spending over $1 MILLION to move to hand-marked paper ballots. Instead, dozens of ExpressVote barcode machines were deployed at nearly every early voting location and — according to our County Chair — workers were instructed to offer and encourage electronic voting. The only known contract is a §31.093 separate primary — which says in its own text that the EA "may not prevent" the county chair from supervising the election. But the EA selected the voting system, programmed the ballot format, chose the locations, conducted all training, and established all procedures — powers that under the Election Code belong only to the county clerk (or EA if County has one) in a §172.126 joint primary. Then EA ignored the County Chair when she called foul. Why does the framework matter? Under a separate primary agreement, the Republican Party independently oversees its own election. Under a joint primary agreement, the county EA and Commissioners take control of everything. When ballots are commingled, check-in is combined, and workers are shared — the party loses all ability to protect the security and purity of our election nor can independently verify its own primary results. Today I called on the Commissioners Court to: ✅ Convene a special session on the primary framework If we got more than 2:50 seconds, ask to: Direct the EA to identify her specific statutory authority — on the record ✅ Separate the scanners, ballot boxes, voter lists, and check-in immediately ✅ Remove the unauthorized BMDs and unauthorized ballot format ✅ Refer the matter for investigation Once R and D ballots are commingled without authorization, the security and purity of the ballot box is destroyed — and it cannot be restored. Neither party can independently verify its own ballots are legal. That's not a procedural issue. That's a constitutional violation under Article VI, §4 of the Texas Constitution. We're asking questions that deserve answers. 🇺🇸

Lori Gallagher

57,577 views • 5 months ago

Spencer Pratt voters are reporting that their ballots have been rejected. This is from an independent journalist in San Diego named Amy Reichert: "Multiple Spencer Pratt voters have contacted me saying their signatures were rejected and their ballots were not counted. Here is the letter they get. “More than 200,000 Californians have had their ballots rejected since 2020. This is what happens when you don’t require voter ID. If a machine can identify your party registration, people have every right to question whether the process can be manipulated." This is from a man who lives in Southern California named Russ. He said, "Today I received a letter, just like my neighbor did, informing me that my California ballot was not counted because my ‘signature verification’ supposedly didn't match the state's records. I've been voting in California for 20 years." Leftists are engaging in a series of talking points to defend the California election system. They say things like, “Well, you need to sign the ballots, so there will be signature verification” or “We check those signatures” or “It has to be postmarked by Election Day” or “Ballot harvesters have to put their signature on the ballot envelope, so it's not done anonymously. There's still a chain of custody for these ballots.” They're saying these things to try to instill confidence in voters, when none of us have any confidence in the California election system. Each and every one of their talking points is contradicted by the actual election procedure and the laws on the books that guide Los Angeles elections. So they say “You need to sign it.” OK, but does a smiley face count? Oh, it counts. And they say, “We checked these signatures.” OK, do you check them on any ballots other than Republican ballots? Because there have been reports of Los Angeles election workers telling journalists, “Actually, we don't really check these ballots.” So do you or don't you? The mail-in ballots that come in late, the left says, “They have to be postmarked by Election Day. These are not people that are casting ballots after Election Day tallies have been made public.” Actually, you don't need a postmark. If you look at California election law, you don't have to have a postmark by Election Day. You can simply handwrite any date that is either on or before Election Day, and the ballot is counted. What happens to the ballots that have been ballot-harvested and are turned in to be counted if the ballot harvester doesn't put his or her name on that ballot? Is that ballot rejected? Oh, no, it's not rejected. That ballot is still counted, even if the ballot harvester doesn't sign the ballot envelope. So all of these talking points that are thrown at us by the left are…lies.

Spencer Pratt voters are reporting that their ballots have been rejected. This is from an independent journalist in San Diego named Amy Reichert: "Multiple Spencer Pratt voters have contacted me saying their signatures were rejected and their ballots were not counted. Here is the letter they get. “More than 200,000 Californians have had their ballots rejected since 2020. This is what happens when you don’t require voter ID. If a machine can identify your party registration, people have every right to question whether the process can be manipulated." This is from a man who lives in Southern California named Russ. He said, "Today I received a letter, just like my neighbor did, informing me that my California ballot was not counted because my ‘signature verification’ supposedly didn't match the state's records. I've been voting in California for 20 years." Leftists are engaging in a series of talking points to defend the California election system. They say things like, “Well, you need to sign the ballots, so there will be signature verification” or “We check those signatures” or “It has to be postmarked by Election Day” or “Ballot harvesters have to put their signature on the ballot envelope, so it's not done anonymously. There's still a chain of custody for these ballots.” They're saying these things to try to instill confidence in voters, when none of us have any confidence in the California election system. Each and every one of their talking points is contradicted by the actual election procedure and the laws on the books that guide Los Angeles elections. So they say “You need to sign it.” OK, but does a smiley face count? Oh, it counts. And they say, “We checked these signatures.” OK, do you check them on any ballots other than Republican ballots? Because there have been reports of Los Angeles election workers telling journalists, “Actually, we don't really check these ballots.” So do you or don't you? The mail-in ballots that come in late, the left says, “They have to be postmarked by Election Day. These are not people that are casting ballots after Election Day tallies have been made public.” Actually, you don't need a postmark. If you look at California election law, you don't have to have a postmark by Election Day. You can simply handwrite any date that is either on or before Election Day, and the ballot is counted. What happens to the ballots that have been ballot-harvested and are turned in to be counted if the ballot harvester doesn't put his or her name on that ballot? Is that ballot rejected? Oh, no, it's not rejected. That ballot is still counted, even if the ballot harvester doesn't sign the ballot envelope. So all of these talking points that are thrown at us by the left are…lies.

Liz Wheeler

84,881 views • 1 month ago

1.7 MILLION BALLOT IMAGES DESTROYED in the GEORGIA 2020 Election. DOMINION 2020 Stolen Election Report details significant findings drawn from court admissions, forensic reports, sworn affidavits, federal EAVS data, and a state-commissioned Office of Special Counsel. 1.) Fulton County, GA, the county admitted in federal court that the majority of in-person ballot images from the 2020 machine count were not preserved. Statewide, roughly 1.7 million ballot images were destroyed and 132,286 of 148,318 absentee-ballot cryptographic authentication files were deleted, erasing the ability to prove that any surviving image is unaltered. 2.) Fulton County, GA, 17,852 recount votes have no corresponding ballot image; 20,713 ballots came from tabulators with no provenance; 3,930 ballots were scanned and counted more than once. Georgia's certified presidential margin was 12,670 votes. Dr. Philip Stark of UC Berkeley, the inventor of risk-limiting audits, concluded on the record that Georgia’s results cannot be validated. 3.) Maricopa County, AZ, 263,139 ballot images were corrupt and 21,273 were missing; up to ten non-compliant paper stocks drove an 11.2% adjudication rate, roughly ten times the 2016 baseline. Box manifests delivered to auditors did not match the ballots inside, with duplicates commingled with originals and a documented case of UOCAVA ballots counted more than once. 4.) Detroit, MI, tens of thousands of ballots arrived at the TCF Center at roughly 3:30 AM with no chain-of-custody documentation. A Speckin Forensics sample found up to 20% of absentee ballots lacked the legally required application, the document that authorizes issuance and ties a ballot to a specific registered voter. 5.) Delaware County, PA, sworn testimony that named officials physically tore machine tapes and return sheets into pieces and placed them in the trash. One official reportedly saying the data had "no audit value" because it "wouldn't match the election results." 6.) Pennsylvania statewide, 440,781 mail ballots are classified in federal EAVS data as "status unknown." The state has no record of whether they were delivered, returned, counted, rejected, or disposed of. The certified margin was 81,660 votes. The unaccounted-for volume exceeds the margin by more than 5:1. 7.) Milwaukee, WI, a USB drive holding absentee voter data for more than 120,000 votes briefly lost chain of custody on election night. This happened during the same window as an unexplained 143,379-vote batch upload reported at 3:26 AM. The drive's write metadata has not been forensically examined. 8.) In Wisconsin, a Dominion reseller is alleged to have retained physical Wisconsin ballots at a facility in Minnesota without governmental authorization. They also refused to comply with Office of Special Counsel subpoenas. In Green Bay, a private non-government actor controlled the tabulators, the ballots, and a hidden Wi-Fi access point at the central count facility. 9.) Fulton County, GA, 35 tabulator memory cards were swapped mid-election with no chain-of-custody documentation, and closing tapes were printed on surrogate machines rather than the actual scanners. Dominion Voting Systems personnel, not government officials, were in operational control of voting systems in nearly every Georgia county during the election period. 10.) Industry-wide design feature, scanners use a documented "color dropout" function that deletes red-ink markings such as "TEST" or "VOID" from the digital ballot image. In the 2021 New York City mayoral primary, 135,000 test ballots were accidentally included in preliminary results, demonstrating that a test ballot and a cast ballot become indistinguishable in the digital record of record. The standard reassurance after any contested election is some version of "the paper is the ground truth, just look at the ballots." The record on Ballot Integrity across Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin describes what happens when someone actually tries. In Maricopa, 263,139 ballot images were corrupt and 21,273 were missing, paper stock did not match the certified specification, and box manifests delivered to auditors did not match the ballots inside. In Fulton County, Georgia, the county itself admitted in federal court that the majority of in-person ballot images from the 2020 machine count were not preserved, statewide, roughly 1.7 million ballot images were destroyed along with the cryptographic hashes that would have let anyone prove the survivors were unaltered. In Detroit, tens of thousands of ballots arrived at the counting center at 3:30 AM with no chain of custody, and a fifth of sampled absentee ballots lacked the legally required application. In Delaware County, Pennsylvania, an eyewitness testified that a named official tore machine tapes and return sheets into pieces and threw them in the trash; statewide, 440,781 Pennsylvania mail ballots are carried on federal EAVS data as "status unknown," more than five times the certified margin. In Wisconsin, a USB drive holding more than 120,000 absentee votes briefly went missing during active counting, ballots are alleged to be retained by a private vendor across state lines, and in Green Bay a non-government actor controlled the tabulators through a hidden Wi-Fi access point at the central count facility. Taken together, the record describes a ballot corpus that, in the places that decided the election, cannot be independently verified, because the paper was commingled, the images were destroyed, the hashes were deleted, the custody was broken, and in several jurisdictions the people with physical control of the ballots were not government officials. What the record shows is not a dispute about specific votes; it is a dispute about whether the votes can be looked at. A ballot without an application has no legal origin. A ballot image without its hash cannot be authenticated. A recount vote with no corresponding image has no paper behind it. A batch of ballots from a tabulator with no provenance cannot be traced to any polling place. A USB drive that briefly went missing on election night cannot be excluded as a write event without metadata forensics that have not been performed. A mail ballot classified "status unknown" in federal survey data is neither counted nor rejected, it is simply gone. Ballots in the custody of a private vendor across a state line or controlled by a non-government actor through a hidden Wi-Fi access point, have passed out of the chain of lawful custody entirely. Across the five states that decided one election, these facts describe a ballot corpus that has been rendered unverifiable, and a verification mantra that stops working the moment the paper, the images, the hashes, and the custody records are simultaneously gone.

1.7 MILLION BALLOT IMAGES DESTROYED in the GEORGIA 2020 Election. DOMINION 2020 Stolen Election Report details significant findings drawn from court admissions, forensic reports, sworn affidavits, federal EAVS data, and a state-commissioned Office of Special Counsel. 1.) Fulton County, GA, the county admitted in federal court that the majority of in-person ballot images from the 2020 machine count were not preserved. Statewide, roughly 1.7 million ballot images were destroyed and 132,286 of 148,318 absentee-ballot cryptographic authentication files were deleted, erasing the ability to prove that any surviving image is unaltered. 2.) Fulton County, GA, 17,852 recount votes have no corresponding ballot image; 20,713 ballots came from tabulators with no provenance; 3,930 ballots were scanned and counted more than once. Georgia's certified presidential margin was 12,670 votes. Dr. Philip Stark of UC Berkeley, the inventor of risk-limiting audits, concluded on the record that Georgia’s results cannot be validated. 3.) Maricopa County, AZ, 263,139 ballot images were corrupt and 21,273 were missing; up to ten non-compliant paper stocks drove an 11.2% adjudication rate, roughly ten times the 2016 baseline. Box manifests delivered to auditors did not match the ballots inside, with duplicates commingled with originals and a documented case of UOCAVA ballots counted more than once. 4.) Detroit, MI, tens of thousands of ballots arrived at the TCF Center at roughly 3:30 AM with no chain-of-custody documentation. A Speckin Forensics sample found up to 20% of absentee ballots lacked the legally required application, the document that authorizes issuance and ties a ballot to a specific registered voter. 5.) Delaware County, PA, sworn testimony that named officials physically tore machine tapes and return sheets into pieces and placed them in the trash. One official reportedly saying the data had "no audit value" because it "wouldn't match the election results." 6.) Pennsylvania statewide, 440,781 mail ballots are classified in federal EAVS data as "status unknown." The state has no record of whether they were delivered, returned, counted, rejected, or disposed of. The certified margin was 81,660 votes. The unaccounted-for volume exceeds the margin by more than 5:1. 7.) Milwaukee, WI, a USB drive holding absentee voter data for more than 120,000 votes briefly lost chain of custody on election night. This happened during the same window as an unexplained 143,379-vote batch upload reported at 3:26 AM. The drive's write metadata has not been forensically examined. 8.) In Wisconsin, a Dominion reseller is alleged to have retained physical Wisconsin ballots at a facility in Minnesota without governmental authorization. They also refused to comply with Office of Special Counsel subpoenas. In Green Bay, a private non-government actor controlled the tabulators, the ballots, and a hidden Wi-Fi access point at the central count facility. 9.) Fulton County, GA, 35 tabulator memory cards were swapped mid-election with no chain-of-custody documentation, and closing tapes were printed on surrogate machines rather than the actual scanners. Dominion Voting Systems personnel, not government officials, were in operational control of voting systems in nearly every Georgia county during the election period. 10.) Industry-wide design feature, scanners use a documented "color dropout" function that deletes red-ink markings such as "TEST" or "VOID" from the digital ballot image. In the 2021 New York City mayoral primary, 135,000 test ballots were accidentally included in preliminary results, demonstrating that a test ballot and a cast ballot become indistinguishable in the digital record of record. The standard reassurance after any contested election is some version of "the paper is the ground truth, just look at the ballots." The record on Ballot Integrity across Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin describes what happens when someone actually tries. In Maricopa, 263,139 ballot images were corrupt and 21,273 were missing, paper stock did not match the certified specification, and box manifests delivered to auditors did not match the ballots inside. In Fulton County, Georgia, the county itself admitted in federal court that the majority of in-person ballot images from the 2020 machine count were not preserved, statewide, roughly 1.7 million ballot images were destroyed along with the cryptographic hashes that would have let anyone prove the survivors were unaltered. In Detroit, tens of thousands of ballots arrived at the counting center at 3:30 AM with no chain of custody, and a fifth of sampled absentee ballots lacked the legally required application. In Delaware County, Pennsylvania, an eyewitness testified that a named official tore machine tapes and return sheets into pieces and threw them in the trash; statewide, 440,781 Pennsylvania mail ballots are carried on federal EAVS data as "status unknown," more than five times the certified margin. In Wisconsin, a USB drive holding more than 120,000 absentee votes briefly went missing during active counting, ballots are alleged to be retained by a private vendor across state lines, and in Green Bay a non-government actor controlled the tabulators through a hidden Wi-Fi access point at the central count facility. Taken together, the record describes a ballot corpus that, in the places that decided the election, cannot be independently verified, because the paper was commingled, the images were destroyed, the hashes were deleted, the custody was broken, and in several jurisdictions the people with physical control of the ballots were not government officials. What the record shows is not a dispute about specific votes; it is a dispute about whether the votes can be looked at. A ballot without an application has no legal origin. A ballot image without its hash cannot be authenticated. A recount vote with no corresponding image has no paper behind it. A batch of ballots from a tabulator with no provenance cannot be traced to any polling place. A USB drive that briefly went missing on election night cannot be excluded as a write event without metadata forensics that have not been performed. A mail ballot classified "status unknown" in federal survey data is neither counted nor rejected, it is simply gone. Ballots in the custody of a private vendor across a state line or controlled by a non-government actor through a hidden Wi-Fi access point, have passed out of the chain of lawful custody entirely. Across the five states that decided one election, these facts describe a ballot corpus that has been rendered unverifiable, and a verification mantra that stops working the moment the paper, the images, the hashes, and the custody records are simultaneously gone.

The SCIF

50,644 views • 1 month ago

DOMINION Voting System's Executives admitted in 2015 that their machines can not, and do not check for fraudulent ballots when asked point blank at a press conference. This also proves when an election worker from Alabama printed ballots from across the street on notebook paper and Dominion's machine accepted every single one. Based on technical reports, security analyses, and official documentation, the ICX itself does not have built-in capabilities to autonomously determine if a ballot is fraudulent in terms of paper authenticity, watermarks, or other physical markers. Instead, fraud prevention in Dominion systems relies on procedural safeguards like voter verification of the printed ballot before casting, post-election audits of paper records, chain-of-custody protocols for ballots, and physical security measures around the machines. Some analyses have identified vulnerabilities in the ICX that could potentially allow manipulation if an attacker has physical access, but these do not involve the machine detecting or rejecting fraudulent ballots based on paper properties—detection would require human-led audits or recounts, which solely relies on trust of the people overseeing an election. There is no evidence that Canon scanner technology (likely referring to Canon's document scanners, such as the DR-G1130 models used in Dominion's ImageCast Central systems for high-volume scanning) has ever been installed in "every machine" for the purpose of checking watermarks or ballot paper authenticity. Canon scanners in Dominion setups are primarily for optical scanning of marked ballots to count votes, not for forensic-level paper verification. This is HUGE!

DOMINION Voting System's Executives admitted in 2015 that their machines can not, and do not check for fraudulent ballots when asked point blank at a press conference. This also proves when an election worker from Alabama printed ballots from across the street on notebook paper and Dominion's machine accepted every single one. Based on technical reports, security analyses, and official documentation, the ICX itself does not have built-in capabilities to autonomously determine if a ballot is fraudulent in terms of paper authenticity, watermarks, or other physical markers. Instead, fraud prevention in Dominion systems relies on procedural safeguards like voter verification of the printed ballot before casting, post-election audits of paper records, chain-of-custody protocols for ballots, and physical security measures around the machines. Some analyses have identified vulnerabilities in the ICX that could potentially allow manipulation if an attacker has physical access, but these do not involve the machine detecting or rejecting fraudulent ballots based on paper properties—detection would require human-led audits or recounts, which solely relies on trust of the people overseeing an election. There is no evidence that Canon scanner technology (likely referring to Canon's document scanners, such as the DR-G1130 models used in Dominion's ImageCast Central systems for high-volume scanning) has ever been installed in "every machine" for the purpose of checking watermarks or ballot paper authenticity. Canon scanners in Dominion setups are primarily for optical scanning of marked ballots to count votes, not for forensic-level paper verification. This is HUGE!

The SCIF

35,506 views • 6 months ago

Georgia State Election Board Votes to Subpoena 2020 Election Physical Ballots, Envelopes, and Stubs From Fulton County | Brian Lupo, The Gateway Pundit Earlier this month, the Gateway Pundit reported that Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene sent a formal request to the Department of Justice to investigate the 2020 Election in Georgia, specifically the Georgia Secretary of State and Fulton County. This followed a July resolution passed by the Georgia State Election Board requesting that the Secretary of State and Attorney General seek the assistance of the Department of Justice to help resolve outstanding allegations, specifically SEB Complaint 2023-025. On Wednesday, September 24th, the Georgia State Election Board voted 3-1 to issue subpoenas to the Fulton County Board of Registrations, the Director of Elections Nadine Williams, and the Clerk of the Superior Court, Shae Alexander. The subpoena will be for the physical paper ballots, ballot stubs, and the envelopes for all absentee ballots. Previously, on Election Day 2024, the Board had subpoenaed “election documents” from the 2020 election; however, after nine months, Fulton County had not yet handed over any corresponding documents, subject to pending litigation. The subpoena is a continuation of the investigation in SEB Complaint 2023-025, which alleges that thousands of duplicate ballots were counted in the final tally, as acknowledged by Board Member Sara Ghazal. However, that complaint also entails other claims, such as 17,852 ballots that were counted that have no corresponding ballot images. During the discussion, Ghazal called the subpoenas a “fishing expedition” before Board Member Dr. Janice Johnston pointed out that each absentee ballot should have a ballot envelope and a ballot stub maintained. Ghazal questioned, “To what end are you seeking the actual envelopes? What is it you hope to discover from that?” “This is to complete the investigation regarding irregularities and inconsistencies from the 2020 election, specifically pertaining to case SEB 2023-025.” Dr. Johnston explained that the case was about missing documents for 20,000 votes that were part of the Election Day count, as well as 17,852 votes that are missing ballot images, including absentee ballots. “Are there allegations that the ballot envelopes are not authentic? This feels like a fishing expedition to me!” Board Member Janelle King interjected that if you have the ballots without the envelopes, then you can’t authenticate that they’re legitimate ballots. “What do you propose to do to authenticate more than 100,000 envelopes?” Ghazal asked. “For every absentee ballot, there should be an absentee ballot envelope,” Dr. Johnston responded. Ghazal followed up, “So it’s just about the number of envelopes?” “Perhaps,” fired back Dr. Johnston. On October 15, 2020, Rick Barron, then-Director of Elections for Fulton County, ordered 770,210 Election Day ballots at a cost of $223,360.90. According to the description in the quote from Runbeck Election Services, these ballots contained “no stub[s]” and were to arrive “on or before October 24, 2020.” Initially, this purchase (as well as an additional 144,350 ballots from Fidlar Election) was claimed to be “Emergency Ballots” by Gabriel Sterling, the Chief Operating Officer of the Georgia Secretary of State. “They got hit by COVID. They [were] concern[ed] they couldn’t do logic & accuracy testing of the equipment. As a plan C, they ordered enough emergency ballots in case they had to do handmarked at all polling locations,” Sterling wrote. Veteran poll manager Bridget Thorne, who is now on the Fulton County Board of Commissioners, questioned the “no stub” portion of the order back in November 2021. “The stubs number the ballots. When a ballot is used[,] the manager keeps the stub to verify it was used. The ballot then becomes anonymous for the voter. With no stubs, there is no accountability of used/unused ballots. Why would anyone order no stub ballots?” There also didn’t seem to be a corresponding order for any envelopes in the request. In Georgia, absentee ballots are different in size from election day ballots that are printed on Dominion ICX Ballot Marking Devices. However, emergency provisional ballots are the same size as the absentee ballot, but do not have a corresponding envelope since they are cast in a precinct rather than mailed back. Since there aren’t any provided records of Georgia ordering corresponding envelopes with the more than 900,000 excess ballots they ordered in late October 2020, and since Sterling acknowledged that they didn’t need to use “Plan C,” the total number of absentee ballots should equal the number of envelopes retained, and any emergency provisional ballots should have a stub to document the usage of emergency ballots. Read more:

Georgia State Election Board Votes to Subpoena 2020 Election Physical Ballots, Envelopes, and Stubs From Fulton County | Brian Lupo, The Gateway Pundit Earlier this month, the Gateway Pundit reported that Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene sent a formal request to the Department of Justice to investigate the 2020 Election in Georgia, specifically the Georgia Secretary of State and Fulton County. This followed a July resolution passed by the Georgia State Election Board requesting that the Secretary of State and Attorney General seek the assistance of the Department of Justice to help resolve outstanding allegations, specifically SEB Complaint 2023-025. On Wednesday, September 24th, the Georgia State Election Board voted 3-1 to issue subpoenas to the Fulton County Board of Registrations, the Director of Elections Nadine Williams, and the Clerk of the Superior Court, Shae Alexander. The subpoena will be for the physical paper ballots, ballot stubs, and the envelopes for all absentee ballots. Previously, on Election Day 2024, the Board had subpoenaed “election documents” from the 2020 election; however, after nine months, Fulton County had not yet handed over any corresponding documents, subject to pending litigation. The subpoena is a continuation of the investigation in SEB Complaint 2023-025, which alleges that thousands of duplicate ballots were counted in the final tally, as acknowledged by Board Member Sara Ghazal. However, that complaint also entails other claims, such as 17,852 ballots that were counted that have no corresponding ballot images. During the discussion, Ghazal called the subpoenas a “fishing expedition” before Board Member Dr. Janice Johnston pointed out that each absentee ballot should have a ballot envelope and a ballot stub maintained. Ghazal questioned, “To what end are you seeking the actual envelopes? What is it you hope to discover from that?” “This is to complete the investigation regarding irregularities and inconsistencies from the 2020 election, specifically pertaining to case SEB 2023-025.” Dr. Johnston explained that the case was about missing documents for 20,000 votes that were part of the Election Day count, as well as 17,852 votes that are missing ballot images, including absentee ballots. “Are there allegations that the ballot envelopes are not authentic? This feels like a fishing expedition to me!” Board Member Janelle King interjected that if you have the ballots without the envelopes, then you can’t authenticate that they’re legitimate ballots. “What do you propose to do to authenticate more than 100,000 envelopes?” Ghazal asked. “For every absentee ballot, there should be an absentee ballot envelope,” Dr. Johnston responded. Ghazal followed up, “So it’s just about the number of envelopes?” “Perhaps,” fired back Dr. Johnston. On October 15, 2020, Rick Barron, then-Director of Elections for Fulton County, ordered 770,210 Election Day ballots at a cost of $223,360.90. According to the description in the quote from Runbeck Election Services, these ballots contained “no stub[s]” and were to arrive “on or before October 24, 2020.” Initially, this purchase (as well as an additional 144,350 ballots from Fidlar Election) was claimed to be “Emergency Ballots” by Gabriel Sterling, the Chief Operating Officer of the Georgia Secretary of State. “They got hit by COVID. They [were] concern[ed] they couldn’t do logic & accuracy testing of the equipment. As a plan C, they ordered enough emergency ballots in case they had to do handmarked at all polling locations,” Sterling wrote. Veteran poll manager Bridget Thorne, who is now on the Fulton County Board of Commissioners, questioned the “no stub” portion of the order back in November 2021. “The stubs number the ballots. When a ballot is used[,] the manager keeps the stub to verify it was used. The ballot then becomes anonymous for the voter. With no stubs, there is no accountability of used/unused ballots. Why would anyone order no stub ballots?” There also didn’t seem to be a corresponding order for any envelopes in the request. In Georgia, absentee ballots are different in size from election day ballots that are printed on Dominion ICX Ballot Marking Devices. However, emergency provisional ballots are the same size as the absentee ballot, but do not have a corresponding envelope since they are cast in a precinct rather than mailed back. Since there aren’t any provided records of Georgia ordering corresponding envelopes with the more than 900,000 excess ballots they ordered in late October 2020, and since Sterling acknowledged that they didn’t need to use “Plan C,” the total number of absentee ballots should equal the number of envelopes retained, and any emergency provisional ballots should have a stub to document the usage of emergency ballots. Read more:

Owen Gregorian

111,839 views • 10 months ago

It could have been done the easy way. Maricopa County chose the hard way, We know why they did. Everyone involved is guilty of TREASON. It took 5 months for Maricopa to send the ballots the Senate subpoenaed. They sent more than 1,600 boxes of ballots, and every box had seals broken and no chain of custody, except for 50. Only 50 boxes, of the more than 1,600 boxes received, were sealed with chain of custody. What took place with the more than 1,550 boxes with no seal or chain of custody? Did you know that ALL ballots were to be printed on 1 specific type of paper with watermark? Instead, 9-10 different types of paper was used, mostly from Staples and OfficeMax. There is a very high degree of certainty that every ballot within those more than 1,550 boxes that arrived with no seal or chain of custody are FAKE AF‼️ Fulton County, GA - BUSTED ✅ Maricopa County, AZ - BUSTED ✅ WHO IS NEXT???

It could have been done the easy way. Maricopa County chose the hard way, We know why they did. Everyone involved is guilty of TREASON. It took 5 months for Maricopa to send the ballots the Senate subpoenaed. They sent more than 1,600 boxes of ballots, and every box had seals broken and no chain of custody, except for 50. Only 50 boxes, of the more than 1,600 boxes received, were sealed with chain of custody. What took place with the more than 1,550 boxes with no seal or chain of custody? Did you know that ALL ballots were to be printed on 1 specific type of paper with watermark? Instead, 9-10 different types of paper was used, mostly from Staples and OfficeMax. There is a very high degree of certainty that every ballot within those more than 1,550 boxes that arrived with no seal or chain of custody are FAKE AF‼️ Fulton County, GA - BUSTED ✅ Maricopa County, AZ - BUSTED ✅ WHO IS NEXT???

RealAF Patriot

364,183 views • 4 months ago

My Thoughts on the Colorado Supreme Court's 14th Amendment Case: First of all if I was on the Supreme court I would not have voted to remove Trump from the ballot. I think there are too many questions as to what constitutes an "Insurrection" and if Trump would have been culpable of such. With that said, to those who are blaming Democrats for this, you can all take note that the 6 people who brought this suit were Colorado voters, 4 of which are Republican and 2 who are unaffiliated. 0 were registered Democrats. The Colorado Supreme court didn't just wake up and decide one morning, "Let's ban Trump from the ballot". They took on a case brought by mainly Republicans and then made a decision after considerations. Now SCOTUS will likely have the final say, and I think that everyone, Democrat and Republican alike, should listen to what they have to say and how they rule. I support whatever decision they come to.

My Thoughts on the Colorado Supreme Court's 14th Amendment Case: First of all if I was on the Supreme court I would not have voted to remove Trump from the ballot. I think there are too many questions as to what constitutes an "Insurrection" and if Trump would have been culpable of such. With that said, to those who are blaming Democrats for this, you can all take note that the 6 people who brought this suit were Colorado voters, 4 of which are Republican and 2 who are unaffiliated. 0 were registered Democrats. The Colorado Supreme court didn't just wake up and decide one morning, "Let's ban Trump from the ballot". They took on a case brought by mainly Republicans and then made a decision after considerations. Now SCOTUS will likely have the final say, and I think that everyone, Democrat and Republican alike, should listen to what they have to say and how they rule. I support whatever decision they come to.

Brian Krassenstein

479,068 views • 2 years ago

2026 Election Fraud Report shows that Fulton County is missing 17,852 ballot images for the candidate-requested recount of the Nov. 03, 2020 General Election. The results for 17,852 ballots were counted, but no corresponding ballot images to authenticate the vote/count. For the second machine count, Fulton County's production included images of ballots and printout cards for 510,073 of the 527,925 cast vote records, 17,852 image files are missing. Most telling is that approximately 17,800 images and the same number of .sha files are missing from the presidential count. The .sha files are crucial in authentication and are used to find if ballots were tampered with or altered in anyway. With these files wiped, they essentially erased their trail. These don't just disappear, they had to be manually deleted. The following is from the Secretary of State's SEB2023-025 Report of Investigation: "Complainants have further alleged that respondent failed to provide all ballot images from the recount in response to an open records request. In response to an investigative subpoena, respondents provided to the SOS investigation division a thumb drive that contained 518,906 ballot images from the December 2020 recount, which is exhibit number 11." "Respondent reported during the recount Dominion voting systems loaned Fulton County four scanners for the recount. The respondent was unsure exactly which counties Dominion had borrowed the scanners from and those scanners have since been returned." "The SOS investigative division asked respondent to provide documentation to corroborate this account. Respondent further noted that the memory cards that were used in the ballot scanners have since been redistributed and used in subsequent elections." - SOS "Report of Investigation" First, the ballot image records were produced under court order as part of discovery in the Curling v. Raffensperger case, not "in response to an open records request," as incorrectly stated in the report. Second, the report claims that Fulton County provided the SOS investigation division a thumb drive that contained 518,906 ballot images from the recount, which they identified as "Exhibit 11." Note the choice of words, careful not to claim what they disingenuously suggest, that Fulton County produced half of the missing ballot images. Combine that with the fact that Ms. McGowan refused to provide Exhibit 11 to the complainants or to the State Election Board unless the Board agreed that case SEB2023-025 was closed. In response to an SEB member's request for a copy of Exhibit 11, Ms. McGowan says, "However, we can make the files available for inspection, so long as the Board is in agreement that this case is fully resolved and closed," and "If 2023-025 is a closed case, we can make them available to you to review at our office." The only rationale in refusing to provide the records identified by the SEB2023-025 Report of Investigation as "Exhibit 11" would be because they know it does not include the missing ballot images. The excuse is that the documents are confidential due to a pending investigation. But Ms. McGowan's ultimatum itself acquiesces to the fact that their investigation is complete. How could she otherwise close the case? Even if there was a pending investigation, the State Election Board is the "regulatory agency" with the duty and authority to investigate election frauds and irregularities- not the Secretary of State's office. The SOS's refusal to provide Exhibit 11 to the very Board with the duty and authority to investigate frauds and irregularities, and from whom the Secretary of State's authority to investigate is derived, defies logic and law. Furthermore, the records at issue, Exhibit 11, are files returned in response to a subpoena for the 2020 Recount ballot images, and ballot images are public records. Therefore, Ms. McGowan's refusal to provide the ballot images to the Board and other requestors, is in violation of Georgia law. The Board did not agree to the ridiculous but telling terms of the ultimatum, but it soon became clear why Ms. McGowan refused to release Exhibit 11. The complainants were able to confirm that the 8,833 "supplemental" ballot images that Fulton County provided to the SOS investigators in response to the subpoena, were copies of other ballot image files already in evidence, and not any of the 17,852 missing ballot images. In any case Ms. McGowan and the investigators never stated that the missing ballot images were found, in whole or in part. To the contrary, the fact that they know the ballot images are missing is evident by the excuses put forth to try and explain why the ballot images are missing- which are refuted below. First, the claim that Dominion Voting Systems loaned Fulton County four scanners for the recount, and Fulton County was unsure of what counties loaned Dominion the scanners, that Dominion then loaned Fulton County, double loaning, is both unlawful and bizarre. Fulton County is not only claiming that they don't have the records, but they can’t even consult the machines because they don't know where the tabulators came from that were used to count the ballots and votes for a federal election. The undersigned is unsure if this was an excuse or an admission, but in either case Fulton County, Ms. McGowan, and the Secretary of State's investigators have established the complete absence of chain of custody, security, and process controls one would expect when borrowing a lawn mower, much less voting equipment deemed "critical infrastructure." When Fulton County was rightfully asked by the SOS's investigators for records corroborating this account "they noted that the memory cards that were used in the ballot scanners have since been redistributed and used in subsequent elections." This excuse fails as well, because the only scanners used for the Recount were ImageCast Central (ICC) tabulators, which do not use or store data on memory cards. Fulton County and/or the Secretary of State's investigators are suggesting that the missing ballot images may be attributed to the four double-borrowed scanners, as if that would be acceptable. Fortunately, or unfortunately, responsibility cannot be placed there either because the missing ballot images are attributed to 7 different tabulators. 7 is more than 4. Note that all of the 17,852 missing ballot images from the Recount are from ballots attributed to advance (early) voting. Perhaps it is only coincidence that the ten tabulators at issue in SEB2023-025, to which a similar number of ballots with no provenance are attributed for the Nov. 3rd count, were also for advance voting. For the sake of being thorough, even if the 518,906 ballot images identified as Exhibit 11 did not include 8,833 copies of other ballot images, and even if Ms. McGowan would have provided the State Election Board with "Exhibit 11" to confirm the ballot image files, and even if the missing ballot images could be traced to the four double-borrowed scanners, and if we knew from which county they were borrowed, or even if the Recount scanners actually used memory cards that could have been repurposed for another election. Even if all of that were true, and it damn sure isn't, but even if it were, it is not responsive. Excuses, even if they weren't proven false, do not change the fact that Fulton County has failed to produce 17,852 ballot images for the Recount. The facts are just as the complainants alleged in SEB2023-025 on July 09, 2022, as corroborated by subject matter experts in federal court filings and Fulton County's own records, 17,852 ballot images are missing from the record. It has been over three years since the complaint was filed, and Ms. McGowan, the Secretary of State's investigators, nor Fulton County can produce the ballot images, nor provide any plausible reason to explain why they’re missing. Although entertaining, what they have provided is a story. A fictional one. What's more, there is no natural, organic, or otherwise unintentional process known that would cause select batches of ballot images to be removed, and even specific ballot images missing from the same batch in which others are present. The only known process that would yield this constellation of circumstances is the intentional removal, replacement and/or injection of fabricated results. For the Recount, 17,852 illegitimate Cast Vote Records without a corresponding ballot image remain- and the excuses and refusal to provide the evidence are as illegitimate as the Cast Vote Records themselves. The unsubstantiated votes included in the official results for the contest of President of the United States are distributed as follows: Donald Trump: 4,319 Joe Biden: 13,390 Jo Jorgensen: 107 Blank Contest: 34 Write-in: 2 TOTAL: 17,852 missing ballot image records. Source: Election Oversight Group Fulton County 2020 General Election Investigation

2026 Election Fraud Report shows that Fulton County is missing 17,852 ballot images for the candidate-requested recount of the Nov. 03, 2020 General Election. The results for 17,852 ballots were counted, but no corresponding ballot images to authenticate the vote/count. For the second machine count, Fulton County's production included images of ballots and printout cards for 510,073 of the 527,925 cast vote records, 17,852 image files are missing. Most telling is that approximately 17,800 images and the same number of .sha files are missing from the presidential count. The .sha files are crucial in authentication and are used to find if ballots were tampered with or altered in anyway. With these files wiped, they essentially erased their trail. These don't just disappear, they had to be manually deleted. The following is from the Secretary of State's SEB2023-025 Report of Investigation: "Complainants have further alleged that respondent failed to provide all ballot images from the recount in response to an open records request. In response to an investigative subpoena, respondents provided to the SOS investigation division a thumb drive that contained 518,906 ballot images from the December 2020 recount, which is exhibit number 11." "Respondent reported during the recount Dominion voting systems loaned Fulton County four scanners for the recount. The respondent was unsure exactly which counties Dominion had borrowed the scanners from and those scanners have since been returned." "The SOS investigative division asked respondent to provide documentation to corroborate this account. Respondent further noted that the memory cards that were used in the ballot scanners have since been redistributed and used in subsequent elections." - SOS "Report of Investigation" First, the ballot image records were produced under court order as part of discovery in the Curling v. Raffensperger case, not "in response to an open records request," as incorrectly stated in the report. Second, the report claims that Fulton County provided the SOS investigation division a thumb drive that contained 518,906 ballot images from the recount, which they identified as "Exhibit 11." Note the choice of words, careful not to claim what they disingenuously suggest, that Fulton County produced half of the missing ballot images. Combine that with the fact that Ms. McGowan refused to provide Exhibit 11 to the complainants or to the State Election Board unless the Board agreed that case SEB2023-025 was closed. In response to an SEB member's request for a copy of Exhibit 11, Ms. McGowan says, "However, we can make the files available for inspection, so long as the Board is in agreement that this case is fully resolved and closed," and "If 2023-025 is a closed case, we can make them available to you to review at our office." The only rationale in refusing to provide the records identified by the SEB2023-025 Report of Investigation as "Exhibit 11" would be because they know it does not include the missing ballot images. The excuse is that the documents are confidential due to a pending investigation. But Ms. McGowan's ultimatum itself acquiesces to the fact that their investigation is complete. How could she otherwise close the case? Even if there was a pending investigation, the State Election Board is the "regulatory agency" with the duty and authority to investigate election frauds and irregularities- not the Secretary of State's office. The SOS's refusal to provide Exhibit 11 to the very Board with the duty and authority to investigate frauds and irregularities, and from whom the Secretary of State's authority to investigate is derived, defies logic and law. Furthermore, the records at issue, Exhibit 11, are files returned in response to a subpoena for the 2020 Recount ballot images, and ballot images are public records. Therefore, Ms. McGowan's refusal to provide the ballot images to the Board and other requestors, is in violation of Georgia law. The Board did not agree to the ridiculous but telling terms of the ultimatum, but it soon became clear why Ms. McGowan refused to release Exhibit 11. The complainants were able to confirm that the 8,833 "supplemental" ballot images that Fulton County provided to the SOS investigators in response to the subpoena, were copies of other ballot image files already in evidence, and not any of the 17,852 missing ballot images. In any case Ms. McGowan and the investigators never stated that the missing ballot images were found, in whole or in part. To the contrary, the fact that they know the ballot images are missing is evident by the excuses put forth to try and explain why the ballot images are missing- which are refuted below. First, the claim that Dominion Voting Systems loaned Fulton County four scanners for the recount, and Fulton County was unsure of what counties loaned Dominion the scanners, that Dominion then loaned Fulton County, double loaning, is both unlawful and bizarre. Fulton County is not only claiming that they don't have the records, but they can’t even consult the machines because they don't know where the tabulators came from that were used to count the ballots and votes for a federal election. The undersigned is unsure if this was an excuse or an admission, but in either case Fulton County, Ms. McGowan, and the Secretary of State's investigators have established the complete absence of chain of custody, security, and process controls one would expect when borrowing a lawn mower, much less voting equipment deemed "critical infrastructure." When Fulton County was rightfully asked by the SOS's investigators for records corroborating this account "they noted that the memory cards that were used in the ballot scanners have since been redistributed and used in subsequent elections." This excuse fails as well, because the only scanners used for the Recount were ImageCast Central (ICC) tabulators, which do not use or store data on memory cards. Fulton County and/or the Secretary of State's investigators are suggesting that the missing ballot images may be attributed to the four double-borrowed scanners, as if that would be acceptable. Fortunately, or unfortunately, responsibility cannot be placed there either because the missing ballot images are attributed to 7 different tabulators. 7 is more than 4. Note that all of the 17,852 missing ballot images from the Recount are from ballots attributed to advance (early) voting. Perhaps it is only coincidence that the ten tabulators at issue in SEB2023-025, to which a similar number of ballots with no provenance are attributed for the Nov. 3rd count, were also for advance voting. For the sake of being thorough, even if the 518,906 ballot images identified as Exhibit 11 did not include 8,833 copies of other ballot images, and even if Ms. McGowan would have provided the State Election Board with "Exhibit 11" to confirm the ballot image files, and even if the missing ballot images could be traced to the four double-borrowed scanners, and if we knew from which county they were borrowed, or even if the Recount scanners actually used memory cards that could have been repurposed for another election. Even if all of that were true, and it damn sure isn't, but even if it were, it is not responsive. Excuses, even if they weren't proven false, do not change the fact that Fulton County has failed to produce 17,852 ballot images for the Recount. The facts are just as the complainants alleged in SEB2023-025 on July 09, 2022, as corroborated by subject matter experts in federal court filings and Fulton County's own records, 17,852 ballot images are missing from the record. It has been over three years since the complaint was filed, and Ms. McGowan, the Secretary of State's investigators, nor Fulton County can produce the ballot images, nor provide any plausible reason to explain why they’re missing. Although entertaining, what they have provided is a story. A fictional one. What's more, there is no natural, organic, or otherwise unintentional process known that would cause select batches of ballot images to be removed, and even specific ballot images missing from the same batch in which others are present. The only known process that would yield this constellation of circumstances is the intentional removal, replacement and/or injection of fabricated results. For the Recount, 17,852 illegitimate Cast Vote Records without a corresponding ballot image remain- and the excuses and refusal to provide the evidence are as illegitimate as the Cast Vote Records themselves. The unsubstantiated votes included in the official results for the contest of President of the United States are distributed as follows: Donald Trump: 4,319 Joe Biden: 13,390 Jo Jorgensen: 107 Blank Contest: 34 Write-in: 2 TOTAL: 17,852 missing ballot image records. Source: Election Oversight Group Fulton County 2020 General Election Investigation

The SCIF

18,146 views • 14 days ago

Tarrant County, Texas, "BALLOT MULE" caught on police body camera admitting MASSIVE Democrat ballot harvesting operation tied to elections between 2016 to 2020. He was paid $200 a ballot and even bought a moped by Democrats to help commit voter fraud. Deborah Peoples, former Tarrant County Democratic Party chairwoman, election board/commission member, candidate, along with her fraud operation, were DIRECTLY IMPLICATED, stating her group "hasn't lost a vote in 11 years," and wins every campaign they back. I wonder why... Charles Jackson was paid to target and harvest mail-in ballots, specifically from elderly voters on Fort Worth’s north side. Jackson describes tricking elderly people into signing pre-filled ballots by pretending they were just "confirming information." He was caught in 2016, and then caught again in 2020, and was let off easy with help from Democrats. Jackson also names Stuart Clegg, director at The Peoples Group, former TCDP executive director, and Peoples' campaign manager, as the person who bonded him out of jail, told him not to talk, and put him under a gag order. The footage was presented as evidence of organized Democrat ballot harvesting in Tarrant County, Texas, involving payments to mules and targeting vulnerable voters to flip votes. Jackson references prior arrests tied to a voter fraud ring and claims protection from Democrat operatives shielded him from full consequences. This is the raw body cam footage containing direct proof of Democrat election interference in Texas. These same Democrat ballot harvesting operations are happening throughout the country. We have a HUGE voter fraud problem in this country, led by Democrats and crooked NGOs.

Tarrant County, Texas, "BALLOT MULE" caught on police body camera admitting MASSIVE Democrat ballot harvesting operation tied to elections between 2016 to 2020. He was paid $200 a ballot and even bought a moped by Democrats to help commit voter fraud. Deborah Peoples, former Tarrant County Democratic Party chairwoman, election board/commission member, candidate, along with her fraud operation, were DIRECTLY IMPLICATED, stating her group "hasn't lost a vote in 11 years," and wins every campaign they back. I wonder why... Charles Jackson was paid to target and harvest mail-in ballots, specifically from elderly voters on Fort Worth’s north side. Jackson describes tricking elderly people into signing pre-filled ballots by pretending they were just "confirming information." He was caught in 2016, and then caught again in 2020, and was let off easy with help from Democrats. Jackson also names Stuart Clegg, director at The Peoples Group, former TCDP executive director, and Peoples' campaign manager, as the person who bonded him out of jail, told him not to talk, and put him under a gag order. The footage was presented as evidence of organized Democrat ballot harvesting in Tarrant County, Texas, involving payments to mules and targeting vulnerable voters to flip votes. Jackson references prior arrests tied to a voter fraud ring and claims protection from Democrat operatives shielded him from full consequences. This is the raw body cam footage containing direct proof of Democrat election interference in Texas. These same Democrat ballot harvesting operations are happening throughout the country. We have a HUGE voter fraud problem in this country, led by Democrats and crooked NGOs.

The SCIF

47,700 views • 22 days ago

In Arizona, Maricopa County 2020 election officials WIPED the entire EMS database & all election records right before the audit and it was CAUGHT on video. The deletion was a deliberate cover-up to destroy and eliminate any and ALL evidence of audit trails, logs, vote manipulation, ballot adjudication irregularities, and fraud in the 2020 election. Brian Ramirez, who was the Database Admin, and Kristi Passarelli were caught on video using fake badges and violating policy, while committing illegal acts and election fraud. The entire "Database" directory was deleted from the D drive of the EMS Primary machine. The main "Results Tally and Reporting" database, core of the Dominion EMS, was missing or not found in its expected location. Logs showed someone accessed the system and executed a purge of all records for the 2020 general election. Critical election data, results, ballot images, reporting files, appeared to have been wiped. The deletion was done illegally to prevent forensic examination of the 2020 results, making independent verification or forensic analysis impossible. The logs were eventually recovered, but the most important part of this entire story is, "WHY did they have to delete these election logs and records in the first place?" To cover up that the 2020 election was STOLEN.

In Arizona, Maricopa County 2020 election officials WIPED the entire EMS database & all election records right before the audit and it was CAUGHT on video. The deletion was a deliberate cover-up to destroy and eliminate any and ALL evidence of audit trails, logs, vote manipulation, ballot adjudication irregularities, and fraud in the 2020 election. Brian Ramirez, who was the Database Admin, and Kristi Passarelli were caught on video using fake badges and violating policy, while committing illegal acts and election fraud. The entire "Database" directory was deleted from the D drive of the EMS Primary machine. The main "Results Tally and Reporting" database, core of the Dominion EMS, was missing or not found in its expected location. Logs showed someone accessed the system and executed a purge of all records for the 2020 general election. Critical election data, results, ballot images, reporting files, appeared to have been wiped. The deletion was done illegally to prevent forensic examination of the 2020 results, making independent verification or forensic analysis impossible. The logs were eventually recovered, but the most important part of this entire story is, "WHY did they have to delete these election logs and records in the first place?" To cover up that the 2020 election was STOLEN.

The SCIF

56,195 views • 1 month ago

🚨 “If there’s nothing wrong with the election… why not turn the ballots over?” As FBI trucks backed up to the loading docks of the Fulton County election warehouse to seize 2020 records, Georgia State Election Board vice-chair Dr. Janice Johnston is confirming what we have suspected for years: For four years, she says, the Board has been blocked from accessing Fulton County’s ballots and key documents - even after issuing subpoenas. Dr. Johnston told Rudy W. Giuliani: “My stance all along has been that if there’s nothing wrong with the election and nothing to hide, why not turn ballots over… It’s been a battle the four years that I’ve been on the Election Board.” She outlined serious issues in Fulton County: - 18,000 missing ballot images from the official recount - 10 ballot boxes with 20,000 votes that could not be documented as ever used in the election - Unsigned ballot box tapes totaling about 310,000 votes (ballots effectively uncertified and never properly attested by poll workers) During the interview last night, she said: “As I speak right now… the FBI trucks have backed up to the loading docks at the Fulton County election warehouse… loading up the 700 boxes of ballots and envelopes and election documents to be taken offsite to a safe and secure place to be reviewed and investigated.” This isn’t coming from a campaign or a pundit. It’s coming from the vice-chair of Georgia’s own State Election Board.

🚨 “If there’s nothing wrong with the election… why not turn the ballots over?” As FBI trucks backed up to the loading docks of the Fulton County election warehouse to seize 2020 records, Georgia State Election Board vice-chair Dr. Janice Johnston is confirming what we have suspected for years: For four years, she says, the Board has been blocked from accessing Fulton County’s ballots and key documents - even after issuing subpoenas. Dr. Johnston told Rudy W. Giuliani: “My stance all along has been that if there’s nothing wrong with the election and nothing to hide, why not turn ballots over… It’s been a battle the four years that I’ve been on the Election Board.” She outlined serious issues in Fulton County: - 18,000 missing ballot images from the official recount - 10 ballot boxes with 20,000 votes that could not be documented as ever used in the election - Unsigned ballot box tapes totaling about 310,000 votes (ballots effectively uncertified and never properly attested by poll workers) During the interview last night, she said: “As I speak right now… the FBI trucks have backed up to the loading docks at the Fulton County election warehouse… loading up the 700 boxes of ballots and envelopes and election documents to be taken offsite to a safe and secure place to be reviewed and investigated.” This isn’t coming from a campaign or a pundit. It’s coming from the vice-chair of Georgia’s own State Election Board.

LindellTV

41,599 views • 6 months ago

The MAINE DEMOCRATIC PARTY was found to be the largest contributor to a BALLOT HARVESTING OPERATION producing fake ballots, owned by a known ballot harvester by the name of Bernard Talmadge who was caught, along with some of his workers, in Indiana in 2017 for REGISTERING DEAD PEOPLE, PRISONERS, and NON-U.S. CITIZENS, and has also been found to be connected to the 2019-2020 election cycle. During the 2020 Election, it is believed that a ballot harvester was working to produce fake election ballots in Georgia as well as other states. In the past, Bernard paid people $75 by check for 5 hours work to produce 50 ballots. In 2018, checks were found in Georgia drawn on the account of "The Operations Group," and the "Ardleigh Group," from the Amalgamated Bank in Washington, D.C. Talmadge owns "The Operations Group, The Ardleigh group, and Block by Block." The Operations Group distributed hundreds of checks in 2018, each for $75. Independent contractors were paid $15 per hour for 5 hours work if they met a quota of producing 10 ballots per hour. Checks were cashed at liquor stores and places usually other than banks. Checks were then compared and were found to be drawn out of different companies but all had the same signatures, routing numbers, and account numbers. In the 2019-2020 election cycle, his companies took in $9.1 MILLION. - The Operations Group: $7.2 MILLION - Ardleigh Group: $1.8 MILLION 1/3 of the contributions were concentrated from the Maine Democratic Party. Is the Maine Democratic Party paying to have fake ballots produced to rig elections? The evidence points to yes, they are. $9.1 million divided by $75 multiplied by 50 votes = 6 MILLION BALLOTS. What kind of massive illegal ballot harvesting, fraudulent ballot producing operation is really going on here, and why hasn't the FBI investigated this and shut it down?

The MAINE DEMOCRATIC PARTY was found to be the largest contributor to a BALLOT HARVESTING OPERATION producing fake ballots, owned by a known ballot harvester by the name of Bernard Talmadge who was caught, along with some of his workers, in Indiana in 2017 for REGISTERING DEAD PEOPLE, PRISONERS, and NON-U.S. CITIZENS, and has also been found to be connected to the 2019-2020 election cycle. During the 2020 Election, it is believed that a ballot harvester was working to produce fake election ballots in Georgia as well as other states. In the past, Bernard paid people $75 by check for 5 hours work to produce 50 ballots. In 2018, checks were found in Georgia drawn on the account of "The Operations Group," and the "Ardleigh Group," from the Amalgamated Bank in Washington, D.C. Talmadge owns "The Operations Group, The Ardleigh group, and Block by Block." The Operations Group distributed hundreds of checks in 2018, each for $75. Independent contractors were paid $15 per hour for 5 hours work if they met a quota of producing 10 ballots per hour. Checks were cashed at liquor stores and places usually other than banks. Checks were then compared and were found to be drawn out of different companies but all had the same signatures, routing numbers, and account numbers. In the 2019-2020 election cycle, his companies took in $9.1 MILLION. - The Operations Group: $7.2 MILLION - Ardleigh Group: $1.8 MILLION 1/3 of the contributions were concentrated from the Maine Democratic Party. Is the Maine Democratic Party paying to have fake ballots produced to rig elections? The evidence points to yes, they are. $9.1 million divided by $75 multiplied by 50 votes = 6 MILLION BALLOTS. What kind of massive illegal ballot harvesting, fraudulent ballot producing operation is really going on here, and why hasn't the FBI investigated this and shut it down?

The SCIF

76,131 views • 9 days ago

Here it is: Remember all those unfolded, pristine mail-in ballots in Fulton County? Excluding the counterfeit ballots the FBI confiscated, Fulton County ordered 1.6 million absentee ballots (from Katie Hobbs’s co-conspirator Runbeck) without envelopes. And guess who came to the rescue? Zuckerbucks “On October 16th, just weeks before the election and after the deadline for requesting an absentee ballot, Fulton County ordered 1.6 million absentee ballots from their vendor, Runbeck. And they ordered those without envelopes. You cannot use an absentee ballot unless it’s folded and placed into an envelope. One of the things that we had observers saying, and that was part of our election contest in 2020, is that there were all these pristine ballots that had never been folded. They cannot possibly be real ballots. Now, the petitioners—the county—are coming in, and they brought in some expert who was paid out of Zuckerbucks, I might add. He is from a left-wing group, and they have focused completely on these ballots. Why? They say it doesn’t matter that they’ve never been folded. That doesn’t mean anything. Yes, it does.”

Here it is: Remember all those unfolded, pristine mail-in ballots in Fulton County? Excluding the counterfeit ballots the FBI confiscated, Fulton County ordered 1.6 million absentee ballots (from Katie Hobbs’s co-conspirator Runbeck) without envelopes. And guess who came to the rescue? Zuckerbucks “On October 16th, just weeks before the election and after the deadline for requesting an absentee ballot, Fulton County ordered 1.6 million absentee ballots from their vendor, Runbeck. And they ordered those without envelopes. You cannot use an absentee ballot unless it’s folded and placed into an envelope. One of the things that we had observers saying, and that was part of our election contest in 2020, is that there were all these pristine ballots that had never been folded. They cannot possibly be real ballots. Now, the petitioners—the county—are coming in, and they brought in some expert who was paid out of Zuckerbucks, I might add. He is from a left-wing group, and they have focused completely on these ballots. Why? They say it doesn’t matter that they’ve never been folded. That doesn’t mean anything. Yes, it does.”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

83,093 views • 25 days ago

Matt Deperno was targeted after exposing that Dominion machines in Antrim County's 2020 election were accessed remotely by an unknown user with escalated privileges who made changes to the Electronic Management System (EMS) database. These changes were to delete logs and cover up election fraud. Deperno also found that the black squares along side the ballot which identifies ballot info were intentionally modified to induce errors, in order to send ballots into adjudication where bulk batches of ballot votes can be changed at the click of a button, with NO oversight, NO transparency, and NO audit trail. When a forensic audit of Antrim County's Dominion Voting Machines was completed by Allied Security, which you can find on my timeline, their conclusion found EXACTLY the same findings as Mr. Deperno and a lot more, which proved that these machines were designed with features to purposely cause errors to send to adjudication to changes votes, have backdoors for remote access, and were used to steal the 2020 election. They also found that ALL the records and logs from the 2020 election that were access through the EMS by the unknown user were wiped. This same action was performed around the country either remotely or in person by Dominion reps posing under the guise of "Trusted Build Maintenance," who also wiped election records and logs from the 2020 election. This should sound familiar because Tina Peters found and saved evidence of the stolen election and they went after her as well. They only come after you when you expose the truth. Now It's time to go after them.

Matt Deperno was targeted after exposing that Dominion machines in Antrim County's 2020 election were accessed remotely by an unknown user with escalated privileges who made changes to the Electronic Management System (EMS) database. These changes were to delete logs and cover up election fraud. Deperno also found that the black squares along side the ballot which identifies ballot info were intentionally modified to induce errors, in order to send ballots into adjudication where bulk batches of ballot votes can be changed at the click of a button, with NO oversight, NO transparency, and NO audit trail. When a forensic audit of Antrim County's Dominion Voting Machines was completed by Allied Security, which you can find on my timeline, their conclusion found EXACTLY the same findings as Mr. Deperno and a lot more, which proved that these machines were designed with features to purposely cause errors to send to adjudication to changes votes, have backdoors for remote access, and were used to steal the 2020 election. They also found that ALL the records and logs from the 2020 election that were access through the EMS by the unknown user were wiped. This same action was performed around the country either remotely or in person by Dominion reps posing under the guise of "Trusted Build Maintenance," who also wiped election records and logs from the 2020 election. This should sound familiar because Tina Peters found and saved evidence of the stolen election and they went after her as well. They only come after you when you expose the truth. Now It's time to go after them.

The SCIF

18,510 views • 3 months ago

Opened ballots found at presiding officer’s home after Johannesburg ANC conference Ballot papers from the ANC’s Johannesburg regional elective conference held in December were allegedly found opened at the home of the conference’s presiding officer on Sunday, raising fresh concerns about the integrity of the vote. The conference was closely contested and has been marred by allegations of irregularities. According to party sources, the ballots should have remained sealed and in the custody of the organisation, making their discovery at a private residence troubling. The ANC has confirmed that it is investigating the matter. No timeline has been given for the outcome of the probe. The development has further deepened divisions within the party’s Johannesburg region, with renewed calls for accountability and transparency.

Opened ballots found at presiding officer’s home after Johannesburg ANC conference Ballot papers from the ANC’s Johannesburg regional elective conference held in December were allegedly found opened at the home of the conference’s presiding officer on Sunday, raising fresh concerns about the integrity of the vote. The conference was closely contested and has been marred by allegations of irregularities. According to party sources, the ballots should have remained sealed and in the custody of the organisation, making their discovery at a private residence troubling. The ANC has confirmed that it is investigating the matter. No timeline has been given for the outcome of the probe. The development has further deepened divisions within the party’s Johannesburg region, with renewed calls for accountability and transparency.

MDN NEWS

11,486 views • 6 months ago

2026 Forensic Report of Fulton County's 2020 Election Finds 26 Counts of Fraud & Irregularities. The fraud is paramount in scale, affecting HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of VOTES. Election Oversight Group finds systemic failures, fraud, tampering, double-counted ballots, missing records, votes appearing, records and logs deleted, and numerous law violations. Here are ALL 26 findings: Refer to video document for in-depth breakdown with evidence, screenshots, etc., with correlating number. 1.) Complete installation of new/un-tested software on Ballot Marking Devices, BMDs, right before the election, allegedly nullifying prior EAC certification. 2.) Failure to conduct required additional testing on BMDs after the software installation in Count 1. 3.) Unauthorized/last-minute ordering of roughly 1+ million absentee ballots, alleged as providing "means, method, and opportunity" for fraud, overt act. 4.) Willful/intentional failure to perform proper signature verification on absentee ballot envelopes, per Georgia law and consent order. Claims very low rejection rates and inadequate checks. 5.) Unlawful swapping of 35 advance voting tabulator memory cards during the live election, also alleges major discrepancies in absentee ballot totals after polls closed. 6.) Fabrication of tabulator poll tapes and accuracy law violations affecting 315,000 ballots, 60% of the county’s ballots, cites serial number/ID discrepancies. 7.) Votes from tabulators with no provenance, missing tapes for 10 tabulators covering 20,713 ballots/votes. 8.) Destruction of 374,000 ballot images from early voting, allegedly failing preservation obligations. 9.) Selective destruction of 130,000 electronic ballot image authentication hash files SHA files. SHA files are used to prove that data has not been tampered with. 130,000 of these files were wiped, with no way to tell if files were manipulated. 10.) Willful failure to count nearly all votes for qualified write-in candidates in in-person voting. 11.) CTCL, Center for Tech and Civic Life, administered and controlled nearly all facets of the election process. 12.) Multiple issues at State Farm Arena, including observers being told counting would stop but it continued, Ruby Freeman allegedly operating scanners without authorization, and unsealed mail carts with ballots. 13.) No proper reconciliation of the number of votes cast vs. voters checked in. 14.) Unlawful use of looseleaf paper ballots, example cited from another county, alleged as improper. 15.) Post-election forensic audit by Pro V&V was allegedly a "ruse," questions methodology and transparency. 16.) Falsification of records in the post-election audit, including allegedly adding 6,700 fictitious absentee ballots/votes. 17.) Intentional tampering via double-scanning of 3,930 ballots were intentionally selected from already-scanned batches and scanned/counted again during the recount. 18.) Missing 17,852 ballot images for the candidate-requested recount, only 510,073 of 527,925 cast vote records produced. 19.) Georgia officials impeded the State Election Board’s investigation into allegations. 20.) Encryption keys left unprotected in plain text, allegedly allowing potential manipulation of tabulators/results. 21.) "Dirtiest" voter rolls in Georgia/Fulton, more registered voters than eligible population, exceeding CVAP in some metrics, alleged NVRA/HAVA violations. 22.) Unknown "test ballots" were included in the recount, allegedly injected intentionally. 23.) No records of voters who checked in and cast ballots during early/advance voting, preventing reconciliation. 24.) Failure to maintain daily recap sheets for advance voting at 35 polling locations. 25.) Major discrepancy in absentee ballots. 148,319 counted but only 125,784 voters credited, a gap of 22,535 more ballots than voters, nearly double the statewide margin at the time. 26.) Original count and recount ballots do not match perfectly, thousands of ballots are unique to one or the other, allegedly impossible without manipulation or major errors. Overall, the amount of fraud found from these actions compromised the election, leaving no way for the results from the election to ever be fully validated from the 2020 election, showing major discrepancies far exceeding the margin of victory. Document: Election Oversight Group 2026

2026 Forensic Report of Fulton County's 2020 Election Finds 26 Counts of Fraud & Irregularities. The fraud is paramount in scale, affecting HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of VOTES. Election Oversight Group finds systemic failures, fraud, tampering, double-counted ballots, missing records, votes appearing, records and logs deleted, and numerous law violations. Here are ALL 26 findings: Refer to video document for in-depth breakdown with evidence, screenshots, etc., with correlating number. 1.) Complete installation of new/un-tested software on Ballot Marking Devices, BMDs, right before the election, allegedly nullifying prior EAC certification. 2.) Failure to conduct required additional testing on BMDs after the software installation in Count 1. 3.) Unauthorized/last-minute ordering of roughly 1+ million absentee ballots, alleged as providing "means, method, and opportunity" for fraud, overt act. 4.) Willful/intentional failure to perform proper signature verification on absentee ballot envelopes, per Georgia law and consent order. Claims very low rejection rates and inadequate checks. 5.) Unlawful swapping of 35 advance voting tabulator memory cards during the live election, also alleges major discrepancies in absentee ballot totals after polls closed. 6.) Fabrication of tabulator poll tapes and accuracy law violations affecting 315,000 ballots, 60% of the county’s ballots, cites serial number/ID discrepancies. 7.) Votes from tabulators with no provenance, missing tapes for 10 tabulators covering 20,713 ballots/votes. 8.) Destruction of 374,000 ballot images from early voting, allegedly failing preservation obligations. 9.) Selective destruction of 130,000 electronic ballot image authentication hash files SHA files. SHA files are used to prove that data has not been tampered with. 130,000 of these files were wiped, with no way to tell if files were manipulated. 10.) Willful failure to count nearly all votes for qualified write-in candidates in in-person voting. 11.) CTCL, Center for Tech and Civic Life, administered and controlled nearly all facets of the election process. 12.) Multiple issues at State Farm Arena, including observers being told counting would stop but it continued, Ruby Freeman allegedly operating scanners without authorization, and unsealed mail carts with ballots. 13.) No proper reconciliation of the number of votes cast vs. voters checked in. 14.) Unlawful use of looseleaf paper ballots, example cited from another county, alleged as improper. 15.) Post-election forensic audit by Pro V&V was allegedly a "ruse," questions methodology and transparency. 16.) Falsification of records in the post-election audit, including allegedly adding 6,700 fictitious absentee ballots/votes. 17.) Intentional tampering via double-scanning of 3,930 ballots were intentionally selected from already-scanned batches and scanned/counted again during the recount. 18.) Missing 17,852 ballot images for the candidate-requested recount, only 510,073 of 527,925 cast vote records produced. 19.) Georgia officials impeded the State Election Board’s investigation into allegations. 20.) Encryption keys left unprotected in plain text, allegedly allowing potential manipulation of tabulators/results. 21.) "Dirtiest" voter rolls in Georgia/Fulton, more registered voters than eligible population, exceeding CVAP in some metrics, alleged NVRA/HAVA violations. 22.) Unknown "test ballots" were included in the recount, allegedly injected intentionally. 23.) No records of voters who checked in and cast ballots during early/advance voting, preventing reconciliation. 24.) Failure to maintain daily recap sheets for advance voting at 35 polling locations. 25.) Major discrepancy in absentee ballots. 148,319 counted but only 125,784 voters credited, a gap of 22,535 more ballots than voters, nearly double the statewide margin at the time. 26.) Original count and recount ballots do not match perfectly, thousands of ballots are unique to one or the other, allegedly impossible without manipulation or major errors. Overall, the amount of fraud found from these actions compromised the election, leaving no way for the results from the election to ever be fully validated from the 2020 election, showing major discrepancies far exceeding the margin of victory. Document: Election Oversight Group 2026

The SCIF

173,532 views • 1 month ago

The 2020 ELECTION wasn't just interfered with from overseas. It was stolen and manipulated from right here at home, in the United States, by a 3rd party company called RUNBECK Election Services. A whistleblower blows the lid off Arizona's Maricopa County's 2020 ballot handling, revealing no chain of custody for over 298,000 ballots delivered to Runbeck Election Services. Ballots poured in for days after 2020 polls closed! Trucks loaded with ballots kept arriving from Runbeck, a third-party company specializing in high-speed scanning of duplicates and military votes, right up to November 10th, over a week after Election Day. The witness, who worked on-site, admits, "I have no idea where those ballots were coming from." Even more alarming, no election observers were present at Runbeck's off-site facility, raising serious questions about transparency and chain of custody. The hearing also ties to Dominion machines, but the core issue is clear, Maricopa County took 2.5 weeks to count votes, while Florida wrapped up in under 2.5 hours despite handling millions more. This isn't just inefficiency—it's a red flag for potential fraud. Runbeck prints, mails, processes, and counts ballots without supervision. As the witness notes, these weren't just overseas votes; trays upon trays arrived from unknown sources. Other testimony claimed employees freely adding votes without oversight. Tied to broader allegations of corruption involving figures like Katie Hobbs and even cartel links. Our greatest enemy is from within. Most people have no idea what or who RUNBECK even is. This is another layer to the overall big picture. There are many. This wasn't a legitimate process, it was a loophole for manipulation with a shady company with Democrat and cartel ties to steal elections.

The 2020 ELECTION wasn't just interfered with from overseas. It was stolen and manipulated from right here at home, in the United States, by a 3rd party company called RUNBECK Election Services. A whistleblower blows the lid off Arizona's Maricopa County's 2020 ballot handling, revealing no chain of custody for over 298,000 ballots delivered to Runbeck Election Services. Ballots poured in for days after 2020 polls closed! Trucks loaded with ballots kept arriving from Runbeck, a third-party company specializing in high-speed scanning of duplicates and military votes, right up to November 10th, over a week after Election Day. The witness, who worked on-site, admits, "I have no idea where those ballots were coming from." Even more alarming, no election observers were present at Runbeck's off-site facility, raising serious questions about transparency and chain of custody. The hearing also ties to Dominion machines, but the core issue is clear, Maricopa County took 2.5 weeks to count votes, while Florida wrapped up in under 2.5 hours despite handling millions more. This isn't just inefficiency—it's a red flag for potential fraud. Runbeck prints, mails, processes, and counts ballots without supervision. As the witness notes, these weren't just overseas votes; trays upon trays arrived from unknown sources. Other testimony claimed employees freely adding votes without oversight. Tied to broader allegations of corruption involving figures like Katie Hobbs and even cartel links. Our greatest enemy is from within. Most people have no idea what or who RUNBECK even is. This is another layer to the overall big picture. There are many. This wasn't a legitimate process, it was a loophole for manipulation with a shady company with Democrat and cartel ties to steal elections.

The SCIF

21,917 views • 7 months ago