Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Shocking EXPOSE 92 Constituencies Maharashtra 💥 Excess/less Votes have been counted in 92 Constituencies in #MaharashtraElection2024. Out of this, NDA won 82 Constituencies. If You Go Through This Data: 5:00 pm 20/11/24 Vote %: 58.22 11:30 pm (on the same day) Vote %: 65.02 Before counting Final figure: 66.05%... show more

তন্ময় l T͞anmoy l

26,989 subscribers

37,041 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie Sport #MaharashtraElection2024

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Pranab Chakrabortty

Pranab Chakraborttyvor 1 Jahr

@Adil_INC_ @asmatasleem13 @HakimSaifyINC @iamharmeetK @Adititweets_ @Sanjib__Haloai @Sanjvats @taj_india007 Manufactured scripted election results.

Profilbild von তন্ময় l T͞anmoy l

তন্ময় l T͞anmoy lvor 1 Jahr

@Adil_INC_ @asmatasleem13 @HakimSaifyINC @iamharmeetK @Adititweets_ @Sanjib__Haloai @Sanjvats @taj_india007 Obviously

Profilbild von Mike Johnson

Mike Johnsonvor 1 Jahr

1 Minute. 10 Questions. 100 Days. Please complete Speaker Johnson’s survey regarding President Trump's first 100 Days!

Profilbild von VATS

VATSvor 1 Jahr

@Adil_INC_ @asmatasleem13 @HakimSaifyINC @iamharmeetK @Adititweets_ @Sanjib__Haloai @taj_india007 Need for electoral reforms and stricter laws to prevent such irregularities. It also emphasizes the importance of free and fair elections in a democracy.

Profilbild von Ranjeet Kumar

Ranjeet Kumarvor 1 Jahr

@Adil_INC_ @asmatasleem13 @HakimSaifyINC @iamharmeetK @Adititweets_ @Sanjib__Haloai @Sanjvats @taj_india007 BJP का चुनाव जीतने का कारण है 1-झूठ बोलना 2-जुमला जीवी 3-हिन्दू-मुस्लिम 4-मंदिर-मस्जिद 5-नफरत फेलाना 6- दंगे करवाना 7-अंधभक्त 8-RSS 9-भारत निर्वाचन आयोग 10-EVM(Every Vote For modi) 11-न्यायालय 12-ED,CBI,IT 13-Police 14-Money 15-Godi media 16-BJP IT cell 17-WhatsApp University

Profilbild von Katy

Katyvor 1 Jahr

@Adil_INC_ @asmatasleem13 @HakimSaifyINC @iamharmeetK @Adititweets_ @Sanjib__Haloai @Sanjvats @taj_india007 Ample such Discrepancies especially from the last Lok Sabha onwards. Notified. No convincing response.

Profilbild von ravinder kumar

ravinder kumarvor 1 Jahr

@Adil_INC_ @asmatasleem13 @HakimSaifyINC @iamharmeetK @Adititweets_ @Sanjib__Haloai @Sanjvats @taj_india007 If any of the courts in India giving any notice to these pointed out discrepancies. NO, then these SM awareness making any noise NO, what’s the solution GO BACK TO PEOPLE

Profilbild von Rajkumar (Jai Samvidhan)

Rajkumar (Jai Samvidhan)vor 1 Jahr

@Adil_INC_ @asmatasleem13 @HakimSaifyINC @iamharmeetK @Adititweets_ @Sanjib__Haloai @Sanjvats @taj_india007 Manipulation..

Profilbild von Ashfaque Ahmed 🇮🇳

Ashfaque Ahmed 🇮🇳vor 1 Jahr

@Adil_INC_ @asmatasleem13 @HakimSaifyINC @iamharmeetK @Adititweets_ @Sanjib__Haloai @Sanjvats @taj_india007 Live: भयंकर साजिश रच रहे थे दंगाई ! Abhay Dubey ने जनम कुंडली खोल दी ! Sambhal Jama Masjid ! Maharashtra results #SambhalJamaMasjid #SambhalViolence #ConstitutionDay2024 #MaharashtraElectionResults #Adani #EVM #JharkhandElectionResults #IPLAuction2025

Ähnliche Videos

Answer Is Still Pending From ECI End 🔸2024 Lok Sabha Elections #EVM Data Mismatch: 5,54,598 Votes 'Discarded' across 362 Lok Sabha Seats. Two sets of data released by the #ElectionCommission of India - first on voter turnout or the absolute number of votes polled on the EVMs and the second on the number of EVM votes counted in each constituency on the result day - has found discrepancies in 538 out of 542 Lok Sabha constituencies. In some constituencies, less votes were counted than the number of votes which were polled. In other constituencies, extra or surplus votes were counted. There are so many questions regarding EVM, until get answers from the #ElectionCommission, have to accept that the #Maharashtra Elections were Rigged. #Election2024 #ElectionResults #MaharashtraElection2024

Answer Is Still Pending From ECI End 🔸2024 Lok Sabha Elections #EVM Data Mismatch: 5,54,598 Votes 'Discarded' across 362 Lok Sabha Seats. Two sets of data released by the #ElectionCommission of India - first on voter turnout or the absolute number of votes polled on the EVMs and the second on the number of EVM votes counted in each constituency on the result day - has found discrepancies in 538 out of 542 Lok Sabha constituencies. In some constituencies, less votes were counted than the number of votes which were polled. In other constituencies, extra or surplus votes were counted. There are so many questions regarding EVM, until get answers from the #ElectionCommission, have to accept that the #Maharashtra Elections were Rigged. #Election2024 #ElectionResults #MaharashtraElection2024

তন্ময় l T͞anmoy l

36,403 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Question The Legitimacy Of The Maharashtra MANDATE - An Increase of almost 76 lakhs Votes from 20-11-2024 (5:00 PM) to before the Counting. Very simply, when polls closed at 5.00 p.m. on the 20th, the turnout was 58.22%. By 11.30 p.m. on the same day, after accommodating people presumably waiting in the queue to vote at 5.00 p.m., it increased to 65.02%. Hours before the counting started on the 23rd it was put at 66.05%. This means that the turnout increased by 7.83% after polls closed at 5.00 p.m. - 𝘏𝘰𝘸 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘢𝘯 𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘯𝘶𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘹 𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘸𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘴 𝘤𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘵 5.00 𝘱.𝘮. 𝘢𝘯𝘥 11.30 𝘱.𝘮. 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘺, 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘢𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘶𝘦 𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘥❓ #MaharashtraAssemblyElections2024 #AdaniNotGuilty #BoodheHokeKyaBanoge #GBBO

Question The Legitimacy Of The Maharashtra MANDATE - An Increase of almost 76 lakhs Votes from 20-11-2024 (5:00 PM) to before the Counting. Very simply, when polls closed at 5.00 p.m. on the 20th, the turnout was 58.22%. By 11.30 p.m. on the same day, after accommodating people presumably waiting in the queue to vote at 5.00 p.m., it increased to 65.02%. Hours before the counting started on the 23rd it was put at 66.05%. This means that the turnout increased by 7.83% after polls closed at 5.00 p.m. - 𝘏𝘰𝘸 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘢𝘯 𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘯𝘶𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘹 𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘸𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘴 𝘤𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘵 5.00 𝘱.𝘮. 𝘢𝘯𝘥 11.30 𝘱.𝘮. 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘺, 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘢𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘶𝘦 𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘥❓ #MaharashtraAssemblyElections2024 #AdaniNotGuilty #BoodheHokeKyaBanoge #GBBO

তন্ময় l T͞anmoy l

416,649 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐇𝐄𝐈𝐒𝐓 𝟓 𝐂𝐑𝐎𝐑𝐄 𝐕𝐎𝐓𝐄𝐒 𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐋𝐄 𝐌𝐎𝐃𝐈'𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐈𝐑𝐃 𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐌! (The Mystery of 79 Seats) In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, a staggering discrepancy of nearly 5 crore Votes between initial Polling Day Estimates and Final Figures handed the NDA a flipping 79 Seats in their favor. 𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐕𝐨𝐭𝐞 𝐒𝐮𝐫𝐠𝐞: 46,546,885 (~4.65 crore) across all phases – an average 4.72% hike. This Manipulation allegedly Boosted NDA in 79 Constituencies across 15 States (e.g., 18 in Odisha, 11 in Maharashtra, 10 in West Bengal), Where Victory Margins were slimmer than the Added Votes. Without this, NDA's tally could have dipped below the Majority, paving the way for the INDIA Bloc to claim power. Instead, Modi Scraped through with NDA's 293 seats. 𝐃𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐲 𝐇𝐢𝐣𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐝? The #ElectionCommissionOfIndia calls it a "False Narrative," but the Numbers Don't Lie! #BiharSIR2025_चुनाव_आयोग #BiharSIR_2025 #INDvsENG #DefeatNegativity

𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐇𝐄𝐈𝐒𝐓 𝟓 𝐂𝐑𝐎𝐑𝐄 𝐕𝐎𝐓𝐄𝐒 𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐋𝐄 𝐌𝐎𝐃𝐈'𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐈𝐑𝐃 𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐌! (The Mystery of 79 Seats) In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, a staggering discrepancy of nearly 5 crore Votes between initial Polling Day Estimates and Final Figures handed the NDA a flipping 79 Seats in their favor. 𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐕𝐨𝐭𝐞 𝐒𝐮𝐫𝐠𝐞: 46,546,885 (~4.65 crore) across all phases – an average 4.72% hike. This Manipulation allegedly Boosted NDA in 79 Constituencies across 15 States (e.g., 18 in Odisha, 11 in Maharashtra, 10 in West Bengal), Where Victory Margins were slimmer than the Added Votes. Without this, NDA's tally could have dipped below the Majority, paving the way for the INDIA Bloc to claim power. Instead, Modi Scraped through with NDA's 293 seats. 𝐃𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐲 𝐇𝐢𝐣𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐝? The #ElectionCommissionOfIndia calls it a "False Narrative," but the Numbers Don't Lie! #BiharSIR2025_चुनाव_आयोग #BiharSIR_2025 #INDvsENG #DefeatNegativity

তন্ময় l T͞anmoy l

48,959 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On the result of the Assembly elections, Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut says, "I believe this is not a victory for democracy. It is definitely a victory for PM Modi and Amit Shah. Just like in West Bengal and other states, the names of millions of voters were deleted through SIR, and they did not get the right to vote. There is a difference of 11 lakh votes between victory and defeat. If 9 lakh votes are cut, how can it be a victory for PM Modi and Amit Shah?... I have seen this type of election in Pakistan, Russia, and Azerbaijan. This type of election is not even an election. The results are fixed first, and then the elections are held..."

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On the result of the Assembly elections, Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut says, "I believe this is not a victory for democracy. It is definitely a victory for PM Modi and Amit Shah. Just like in West Bengal and other states, the names of millions of voters were deleted through SIR, and they did not get the right to vote. There is a difference of 11 lakh votes between victory and defeat. If 9 lakh votes are cut, how can it be a victory for PM Modi and Amit Shah?... I have seen this type of election in Pakistan, Russia, and Azerbaijan. This type of election is not even an election. The results are fixed first, and then the elections are held..."

ANI

11,436 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 CNN reporting almost all ballots that have been coming in and being counted for Nithya Raman are mail in ballots that showed up late “in the final days” Historically people who vote by mail typically do so early, these all showed up late “She is dominating the recent ballot dumps. On election night, she trailed Spencer Pratt by about 40,000 votes. Now she's ahead by about 22,000 votes” CNN even admits Spencer Pratt was the clear winner online “He clearly won the battle for clicks online with his anti-establishment message, but ultimately he lost the battle for the most votes in this overwhelmingly Democratic city. LA is still counting votes almost a week after the election day. The county registrar told me that most of the outstanding votes are mail-in ballots that were dropped in the final days” According to data, In California and most vote-by-mail heavy states, people who vote by mail typically do so very early. Often within days of receiving their ballot Ballots are mailed to voters about 29 days before Election Day in California This means there is likely no good reasons for there to be this many mail in ballots coming in the last few days It’s rigged

🚨 CNN reporting almost all ballots that have been coming in and being counted for Nithya Raman are mail in ballots that showed up late “in the final days” Historically people who vote by mail typically do so early, these all showed up late “She is dominating the recent ballot dumps. On election night, she trailed Spencer Pratt by about 40,000 votes. Now she's ahead by about 22,000 votes” CNN even admits Spencer Pratt was the clear winner online “He clearly won the battle for clicks online with his anti-establishment message, but ultimately he lost the battle for the most votes in this overwhelmingly Democratic city. LA is still counting votes almost a week after the election day. The county registrar told me that most of the outstanding votes are mail-in ballots that were dropped in the final days” According to data, In California and most vote-by-mail heavy states, people who vote by mail typically do so very early. Often within days of receiving their ballot Ballots are mailed to voters about 29 days before Election Day in California This means there is likely no good reasons for there to be this many mail in ballots coming in the last few days It’s rigged

Wall Street Apes

328,589 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

#WATCH | #DelhiElection2025 | In a video statement, AAP national convener Arvind Kejriwal says, "...I would like to tell the people of Delhi, that I have come to know through sources that they (BJP) can cause discrepancies in 10% of votes through machines. Vote in such large numbers that every vote goes to 'jhaadu' (AAP). So if we have a 15% lead, we will win by 5%. Give us a lead of more than 10% everywhere...This is the only way to tackle machines, that you vote in large numbers. We have developed a website as a precautionary measure. Learning a lesson from the Maharashtra and Haryana elections, we have decided that on the night of 5th February, we will upload 6 details of every polling booth so that the machines can't be tampered with...If they cause any discrepancy on the day of counting, you can match the numbers..." (Video: AAP)

#WATCH | #DelhiElection2025 | In a video statement, AAP national convener Arvind Kejriwal says, "...I would like to tell the people of Delhi, that I have come to know through sources that they (BJP) can cause discrepancies in 10% of votes through machines. Vote in such large numbers that every vote goes to 'jhaadu' (AAP). So if we have a 15% lead, we will win by 5%. Give us a lead of more than 10% everywhere...This is the only way to tackle machines, that you vote in large numbers. We have developed a website as a precautionary measure. Learning a lesson from the Maharashtra and Haryana elections, we have decided that on the night of 5th February, we will upload 6 details of every polling booth so that the machines can't be tampered with...If they cause any discrepancy on the day of counting, you can match the numbers..." (Video: AAP)

ANI

566,968 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Analysis of SURE data across 64 Pennsylvania counties identified approximately 205,122 more votes counted than voters on record from the PA 2020 election, leading to illegally certifying the 2020 presidential election. A December 28, 2020 analysis by Pennsylvania House Republicans identified a gross discrepancy of approximately 202,377, with a net unexplained discrepancy of approximately 170,830 votes after accounting for over- and under-votes. This totaled more than double Biden's certified margin of 80,555 votes. The mail in-ballots system for the general election of 2020 in Pennsylvania was so fraught with inconsistencies and irregularities that the reliability of the mail-in votes in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is impossible to rely upon. Dec 16, 2020: For instance, Over-vote in Philadelphia County. On November 4th at 11:30am, the DOS posted updated mail in vote counts for Philadelphia County. The number of ballots reported to have been counted was an impossible 508,112 ballots despite the fact that only 432,873 ballots had been issued to voters in that county. Later that day, the ballots counted number was reduced but this begs the question, who had the authority to add and subtract votes on the ballot counts reported to the Department of State? Even if this was simply a data entry error, the lack of internal controls over such reporting necessitates a review of the numbers, the process and system access. Additionally, in a data file received on November 4, 2020, the Commonwealth’s PA Open Data sites reported over 3.1 million mail in ballots sent out. The CSV file from the state on November 4 depicts 3.1 million mail in ballots sent out but on November 2, the information was provided that only 2.7 million ballots had been sent out. This discrepancy of approximately 400,000 ballots from November 2 to November 4 has not been explained. Furthermore, a newly available voter dataset available on the state .gov website, which had been offline for weeks indicated that it was last updated on 11/16/2020. The download of 11/16 shows 75,505 more ballots returned on 11/16 than the download from 11/15. Therefore, from 11/15 to 11/16, 75,505 ballots were added to the dataset with no explanation. Mail Date irregularities to include ballots mailed before the ballot was finalized, ballots mailed late and ballots mailed inconsistent with enacted legislation relative to mail in ballots: 154,584 ballots. There was also voter "Date of Birth" irregularities of 1573 ballots, of voters over 100 years old. Documents/Sources: Election Crime Bureau, Patrick Colbeck, Justice .gov, hsgac .senate .gov.

Analysis of SURE data across 64 Pennsylvania counties identified approximately 205,122 more votes counted than voters on record from the PA 2020 election, leading to illegally certifying the 2020 presidential election. A December 28, 2020 analysis by Pennsylvania House Republicans identified a gross discrepancy of approximately 202,377, with a net unexplained discrepancy of approximately 170,830 votes after accounting for over- and under-votes. This totaled more than double Biden's certified margin of 80,555 votes. The mail in-ballots system for the general election of 2020 in Pennsylvania was so fraught with inconsistencies and irregularities that the reliability of the mail-in votes in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is impossible to rely upon. Dec 16, 2020: For instance, Over-vote in Philadelphia County. On November 4th at 11:30am, the DOS posted updated mail in vote counts for Philadelphia County. The number of ballots reported to have been counted was an impossible 508,112 ballots despite the fact that only 432,873 ballots had been issued to voters in that county. Later that day, the ballots counted number was reduced but this begs the question, who had the authority to add and subtract votes on the ballot counts reported to the Department of State? Even if this was simply a data entry error, the lack of internal controls over such reporting necessitates a review of the numbers, the process and system access. Additionally, in a data file received on November 4, 2020, the Commonwealth’s PA Open Data sites reported over 3.1 million mail in ballots sent out. The CSV file from the state on November 4 depicts 3.1 million mail in ballots sent out but on November 2, the information was provided that only 2.7 million ballots had been sent out. This discrepancy of approximately 400,000 ballots from November 2 to November 4 has not been explained. Furthermore, a newly available voter dataset available on the state .gov website, which had been offline for weeks indicated that it was last updated on 11/16/2020. The download of 11/16 shows 75,505 more ballots returned on 11/16 than the download from 11/15. Therefore, from 11/15 to 11/16, 75,505 ballots were added to the dataset with no explanation. Mail Date irregularities to include ballots mailed before the ballot was finalized, ballots mailed late and ballots mailed inconsistent with enacted legislation relative to mail in ballots: 154,584 ballots. There was also voter "Date of Birth" irregularities of 1573 ballots, of voters over 100 years old. Documents/Sources: Election Crime Bureau, Patrick Colbeck, Justice .gov, hsgac .senate .gov.

The SCIF

17,588 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

#WATCH | Kolkata, West Bengal: TMC National General Secretary and MP Abhishek Banerjee says, "...Mamata ji has clearly said that the manner in which there was a loot in the elections, we did not lose but we were looted into losing...I say this again that perhaps the votes cast through EVMs cannot be hacked but EVMs can be replaced. We have received feedback from several places and the same was shared with the Returning Officer on the day of counting. The serial numbers of EVMs were not matching with 17C. 10 such EVMs came from Kalyani, Memari. There are 100 such counting centres, 100 such Assembly constituencies, where all counting agents were removed after 2 pm. It is recorded in CCTVs. 80-90% counting should have been completed by 2 pm. But look at the time stamp, just 3-4 rounds of counting were done till 2-2.30 pm yesterday...An atmosphere was created to show as if the BJP had already won. Nobody from the State was there. Counting Observer and Micro Observer were men of Centre. Returning Officer was deputed by the Election Commission. Paramilitary forces are guarding...So, there was a loot..."

#WATCH | Kolkata, West Bengal: TMC National General Secretary and MP Abhishek Banerjee says, "...Mamata ji has clearly said that the manner in which there was a loot in the elections, we did not lose but we were looted into losing...I say this again that perhaps the votes cast through EVMs cannot be hacked but EVMs can be replaced. We have received feedback from several places and the same was shared with the Returning Officer on the day of counting. The serial numbers of EVMs were not matching with 17C. 10 such EVMs came from Kalyani, Memari. There are 100 such counting centres, 100 such Assembly constituencies, where all counting agents were removed after 2 pm. It is recorded in CCTVs. 80-90% counting should have been completed by 2 pm. But look at the time stamp, just 3-4 rounds of counting were done till 2-2.30 pm yesterday...An atmosphere was created to show as if the BJP had already won. Nobody from the State was there. Counting Observer and Micro Observer were men of Centre. Returning Officer was deputed by the Election Commission. Paramilitary forces are guarding...So, there was a loot..."

ANI

125,152 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

How did Democrats make election fraud legal in California? We investigated. This is insane. Check this out… Election fraud is institutional and codified into law in California. According to the Secretary of State’s website: - Anyone can register to vote from ANYWHERE, including a ‘public park’ or a ‘street corner’ - No voter ID - No signature required - Mail votes to every ‘voter’ - No limits of ballot harvesting. Anyone can drop off any number of ballots at anytime (!!!) - Unmonitored drop boxes everywhere - Do not count a single vote until AFTER the election (most states count early votes and mail votes BEFORE election) - Keep counting unsigned, unaccountable, no address mail ballots for 7 days after Election Day - Votes certified 5 WEEKS after election by Secretary of State This is a system of fraud specifically designed to manufacture votes in races you need to win and make the fraud untraceable. An example: There’s 100,000 homeless in L.A. Democrats pay them to register to vote (this has been documented on video). Many are registered to toilets in empty parking lots. Where do those ballots go? Who ‘votes’ for them and collects the ballots? Who cares. It’s all legal and untraceable. That is how Democrats make election fraud legal. Give Democrats power again and they will institute this system in your state by law. This is why we must Pass the SAVE America Act now!

How did Democrats make election fraud legal in California? We investigated. This is insane. Check this out… Election fraud is institutional and codified into law in California. According to the Secretary of State’s website: - Anyone can register to vote from ANYWHERE, including a ‘public park’ or a ‘street corner’ - No voter ID - No signature required - Mail votes to every ‘voter’ - No limits of ballot harvesting. Anyone can drop off any number of ballots at anytime (!!!) - Unmonitored drop boxes everywhere - Do not count a single vote until AFTER the election (most states count early votes and mail votes BEFORE election) - Keep counting unsigned, unaccountable, no address mail ballots for 7 days after Election Day - Votes certified 5 WEEKS after election by Secretary of State This is a system of fraud specifically designed to manufacture votes in races you need to win and make the fraud untraceable. An example: There’s 100,000 homeless in L.A. Democrats pay them to register to vote (this has been documented on video). Many are registered to toilets in empty parking lots. Where do those ballots go? Who ‘votes’ for them and collects the ballots? Who cares. It’s all legal and untraceable. That is how Democrats make election fraud legal. Give Democrats power again and they will institute this system in your state by law. This is why we must Pass the SAVE America Act now!

Benny Johnson

301,591 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Up to 40,000 Republican in-person voters were disenfranchised in the 2020 Maricopa County election because of election machines not be tested and manipulated prior to Election Day, with 1 out of 2 ballots in over 125+ vote counting centers rejecting ballots in the 2020 election. Only 17,000 votes separated Governor candidates. If machines were working properly Kari Lake would have won. This is not even counting the hundreds of thousands of fraudulent mail-in ballots found and the 21% of failed ballot signatures. Over 74,000 ballot signatures failed in Maricopa County alone, and if you apply less than half of the 21% at 9%, over 180,000 ballots failed signature verification out of all of Arizona, which would have easily gave Donald Trump the win in Arizona. There is also that fact that there was no oversight at Runbeck with employees aloud to bring in ballots outside the chain-of-custody, and all of the election data WIPED the day before the audit. These same things happened in 2022 and the reprogramming of the memory cards on the tabulation machines with the security seals illegally removed, with the deletion of election data. Maricopa County hid this fact and only admitted this 7 months later when they were shown the security footage. Arizona elections are beyond corrupt and the 2020 and the 2022 elections should have NEVER been certified.

Up to 40,000 Republican in-person voters were disenfranchised in the 2020 Maricopa County election because of election machines not be tested and manipulated prior to Election Day, with 1 out of 2 ballots in over 125+ vote counting centers rejecting ballots in the 2020 election. Only 17,000 votes separated Governor candidates. If machines were working properly Kari Lake would have won. This is not even counting the hundreds of thousands of fraudulent mail-in ballots found and the 21% of failed ballot signatures. Over 74,000 ballot signatures failed in Maricopa County alone, and if you apply less than half of the 21% at 9%, over 180,000 ballots failed signature verification out of all of Arizona, which would have easily gave Donald Trump the win in Arizona. There is also that fact that there was no oversight at Runbeck with employees aloud to bring in ballots outside the chain-of-custody, and all of the election data WIPED the day before the audit. These same things happened in 2022 and the reprogramming of the memory cards on the tabulation machines with the security seals illegally removed, with the deletion of election data. Maricopa County hid this fact and only admitted this 7 months later when they were shown the security footage. Arizona elections are beyond corrupt and the 2020 and the 2022 elections should have NEVER been certified.

The SCIF

18,848 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Most Californians know that Newsom is a liar and has trashed the state. If Prop 50 passes it's only because we all didn't get out & vote NO in numbers too big to rig. They are counting on you not knowing any of this: Vote as early as possible by mail or in-person. Track your ballot to make sure it's counted at BallotTrax .net. Fix any problems with your ballot by calling your county elections office. Approximately 50% of all ballots put aside in cure pile to be fixed never get fixed and counted. If you mail your ballot on Nov 4 at the post office, go inside and insist they postmark it 11/4 in front of you. Do not drop it in USPS box even if it is before collection time. Nov 2024 election in CA had 33K votes not counted as the postmark was after election day. USPS has a Biden-era rule allowing them to postmark drop box mail the next day and that is what will happen to your mailed ballot if you don't take it inside to get postmarked in your presence.

Most Californians know that Newsom is a liar and has trashed the state. If Prop 50 passes it's only because we all didn't get out & vote NO in numbers too big to rig. They are counting on you not knowing any of this: Vote as early as possible by mail or in-person. Track your ballot to make sure it's counted at BallotTrax .net. Fix any problems with your ballot by calling your county elections office. Approximately 50% of all ballots put aside in cure pile to be fixed never get fixed and counted. If you mail your ballot on Nov 4 at the post office, go inside and insist they postmark it 11/4 in front of you. Do not drop it in USPS box even if it is before collection time. Nov 2024 election in CA had 33K votes not counted as the postmark was after election day. USPS has a Biden-era rule allowing them to postmark drop box mail the next day and that is what will happen to your mailed ballot if you don't take it inside to get postmarked in your presence.

Tara Thornton

75,352 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

The Democrats have stolen an election, yet again. Do not let the mainstream media and the left gaslight you in this moment. They are cheaters. They stole the LA mayoral election. The late mail-in ballot numbers are—quite literally—unbelievable. There is no way that this no-name councilwoman got 22% of the in-person vote on election day (plus the mail-in ballots that arrived before election day) and then magically, organically won DOUBLE this percentage—40-45%—of the late mail-in ballots. Coincidentally, 40-45% was just enough to pass Spencer Pratt...isn't that peculiar? She's losing in her own district as she's getting this enormous amount of votes. I find that to be strange. I also find it strange that there were 12,000 more votes for LA mayor than for California governor... Also, on election day, the in-person voter turnout was actually relatively low and the late mail-in ballots was nearly a record high. Meanwhile, Spencer Pratt—whose fundraising skyrocketed in the days before the election—supposedly completely bottomed out from 30% on election day to 20% of late mail-in ballots?! The left is so audacious, they do not even try to hide it. They know they'll get away with it. This is why they fight tooth and nail against all common sense election integrity laws because they need every single aspect of the election to be chaotic and vulnerable, in order to make their fraud so difficult to detect that it's virtually untraceable. We're supposed to just sit here and believe that Nithya Raman got TWICE the percentage of votes in late mail-in ballots as she did on election day?!

The Democrats have stolen an election, yet again. Do not let the mainstream media and the left gaslight you in this moment. They are cheaters. They stole the LA mayoral election. The late mail-in ballot numbers are—quite literally—unbelievable. There is no way that this no-name councilwoman got 22% of the in-person vote on election day (plus the mail-in ballots that arrived before election day) and then magically, organically won DOUBLE this percentage—40-45%—of the late mail-in ballots. Coincidentally, 40-45% was just enough to pass Spencer Pratt...isn't that peculiar? She's losing in her own district as she's getting this enormous amount of votes. I find that to be strange. I also find it strange that there were 12,000 more votes for LA mayor than for California governor... Also, on election day, the in-person voter turnout was actually relatively low and the late mail-in ballots was nearly a record high. Meanwhile, Spencer Pratt—whose fundraising skyrocketed in the days before the election—supposedly completely bottomed out from 30% on election day to 20% of late mail-in ballots?! The left is so audacious, they do not even try to hide it. They know they'll get away with it. This is why they fight tooth and nail against all common sense election integrity laws because they need every single aspect of the election to be chaotic and vulnerable, in order to make their fraud so difficult to detect that it's virtually untraceable. We're supposed to just sit here and believe that Nithya Raman got TWICE the percentage of votes in late mail-in ballots as she did on election day?!

Liz Wheeler

34,463 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

IMPORTANT ‼️ Undeniably Proof Out Of Georgia That Dominion Voting Is Rigging United States Elections. Confirmed With A Hand Count Of Ballots, This Is SHOCKING 🚨 “The result from the Dominion machine showed Lorne Alexander received 34.67% of the vote, Marshall Orson receiving 41.35% of the vote, and Michelle Longspears receiving 23.98% of the vote.The result from the Dominion machine showed Lorne Alexander received 34.67% of the vote, Marshall Orson receiving 41.35% of the vote, and Michelle Longspears receiving 23.98% of the vote. In Georgia, if one candidate doesn't get above 50% of the vote total, a runoff election is automatically held between the two top candidates. Meaning Michelle Longspierce was cut out of the race. But Michelle Longspierce felt odd about the numbers, so she visited different precincts to double check the tallies. Guess what? She noticed that in some precincts she didn't receive a single vote. But how is that possible that a candidate with 24% of the vote total finds precincts where she didn't receive a single vote? While statistically alarming, the real surprise came when she realized there was not one vote cast for her in her own precinct, the same one where she and her husband voted for herself. Spears immediately demanded a hand recount of the results and got one. On June 1st the results were released and the difference between the Dominion machine count and the hand count was shocking. After the hand count Lauren Alexander gained 355 votes, Orson lost 1298 votes and Spears actually gained 3620 votes making her the new runoff candidate. And here's the best part, when you add them all up the hand count shows 2810 votes more than the Dominion machines reported on the 24th. This is huge. In a small county commissioners race with 15 and a half thousand votes total, the Dominion machine tally was short by nearly 3,000 votes. What does that say about all the other races that were conducted on these very same machines? This is proof that the machines cannot be trusted. If Spears had not sounded the alarm, no one would have been able to do this.”

IMPORTANT ‼️ Undeniably Proof Out Of Georgia That Dominion Voting Is Rigging United States Elections. Confirmed With A Hand Count Of Ballots, This Is SHOCKING 🚨 “The result from the Dominion machine showed Lorne Alexander received 34.67% of the vote, Marshall Orson receiving 41.35% of the vote, and Michelle Longspears receiving 23.98% of the vote.The result from the Dominion machine showed Lorne Alexander received 34.67% of the vote, Marshall Orson receiving 41.35% of the vote, and Michelle Longspears receiving 23.98% of the vote. In Georgia, if one candidate doesn't get above 50% of the vote total, a runoff election is automatically held between the two top candidates. Meaning Michelle Longspierce was cut out of the race. But Michelle Longspierce felt odd about the numbers, so she visited different precincts to double check the tallies. Guess what? She noticed that in some precincts she didn't receive a single vote. But how is that possible that a candidate with 24% of the vote total finds precincts where she didn't receive a single vote? While statistically alarming, the real surprise came when she realized there was not one vote cast for her in her own precinct, the same one where she and her husband voted for herself. Spears immediately demanded a hand recount of the results and got one. On June 1st the results were released and the difference between the Dominion machine count and the hand count was shocking. After the hand count Lauren Alexander gained 355 votes, Orson lost 1298 votes and Spears actually gained 3620 votes making her the new runoff candidate. And here's the best part, when you add them all up the hand count shows 2810 votes more than the Dominion machines reported on the 24th. This is huge. In a small county commissioners race with 15 and a half thousand votes total, the Dominion machine tally was short by nearly 3,000 votes. What does that say about all the other races that were conducted on these very same machines? This is proof that the machines cannot be trusted. If Spears had not sounded the alarm, no one would have been able to do this.”

Wall Street Apes

893,931 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

WOAH 🚨 California voter says they voted for only 2 things yesterday. Prop 50 Redistricting and a 1% sales tax increase Both these things “were on the same ballot” The county reported Prop 50 results but showed no counting on the tax increase Gavin Newsom rigged the election “Listen to this. I live in Redding, California. That's in Shasta County. We had to vote on two things yesterday. One was Prop 50, the other one was a 1% increase in sales tax in the county of Shasta County. The Prop 50 is passed as of 5:30 this morning. I found articles on articles 9 hours ago that Prop 50 is passed, so I'm curious if the 1% in my county of increase in sales tax has passed. I can't find anything. It's not counted. They don't have the count. It's on the same ballot. How can you count one? Shasta County is a couple hundred thousand, and for the Prop 50, millions of votes. How can you have one count and not the other when there's only two things on the ballot? It's on the same ballot. It's on the same ballot. And when I went to vote, I couldn't feed the machine. Hmm.”

WOAH 🚨 California voter says they voted for only 2 things yesterday. Prop 50 Redistricting and a 1% sales tax increase Both these things “were on the same ballot” The county reported Prop 50 results but showed no counting on the tax increase Gavin Newsom rigged the election “Listen to this. I live in Redding, California. That's in Shasta County. We had to vote on two things yesterday. One was Prop 50, the other one was a 1% increase in sales tax in the county of Shasta County. The Prop 50 is passed as of 5:30 this morning. I found articles on articles 9 hours ago that Prop 50 is passed, so I'm curious if the 1% in my county of increase in sales tax has passed. I can't find anything. It's not counted. They don't have the count. It's on the same ballot. How can you count one? Shasta County is a couple hundred thousand, and for the Prop 50, millions of votes. How can you have one count and not the other when there's only two things on the ballot? It's on the same ballot. It's on the same ballot. And when I went to vote, I couldn't feed the machine. Hmm.”

Wall Street Apes

557,058 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

HERE WE GO... Obi's Electoral Rigging Odyssey - Part 1 In the 2010 election, Peter Obi was NOT popular in Anambra State and if not for the help of Prof. Maurice Iwu's INEC and to an extent too many candidates on the ballot, he would have been roundly defeated by Chris Ngige. Dr. Chris Ngige (Onwa) was extremely popular then and even in 2013. Ndi Anambra wanted Onwa to return as Governor as they couldn't understand what Peter Obi was doing especially his ANIDS mantra. In that election, Peter Obi got 97,843 votes out of the 284,547 valid votes cast. In other words, a whooping 186,704 voters or 65% of voters in Anambra voted against Peter Obi. In the election, Chris Ngige of then ACN got 60,240 votes even after his strongholds were suppressed through missing names in the voters register and absence of voting materials (I will come to that in a follow-up post). Soludo who ran under PDP got 59,355 votes, Andy Uba of then Labour Party got 26,106votes, Nicholas Ukachukwu of HDP got20,777while Uche Ekwunife who ran under PPA got 9,595 votes. The other 19 minor candidatesgot a total of 10,631 votes. Rejected/invalid votes was16,685votes while the total number of registered voters in that election was 1,844,815 voters meaning that turn out was just 16.33% of registered voters. Peter Obi acknowledged the messed up voters register but quickly accepted INEC's "Solution to the mess" that people with voters card could vote even if their names were not on the voters register. This was a calculated plan by Maurice Iwu's INEC, Peter Obi and APGA to systematically rig the election because they knew that if the election was to be free and fair, Dr. Chris Ngige will trounce Peter Obi. Mind you, Ngige is from Idemili North, which is the LGA with the largest voting strength in Anambra State. In Part 2, we'll go into a little forensic analysis.

HERE WE GO... Obi's Electoral Rigging Odyssey - Part 1 In the 2010 election, Peter Obi was NOT popular in Anambra State and if not for the help of Prof. Maurice Iwu's INEC and to an extent too many candidates on the ballot, he would have been roundly defeated by Chris Ngige. Dr. Chris Ngige (Onwa) was extremely popular then and even in 2013. Ndi Anambra wanted Onwa to return as Governor as they couldn't understand what Peter Obi was doing especially his ANIDS mantra. In that election, Peter Obi got 97,843 votes out of the 284,547 valid votes cast. In other words, a whooping 186,704 voters or 65% of voters in Anambra voted against Peter Obi. In the election, Chris Ngige of then ACN got 60,240 votes even after his strongholds were suppressed through missing names in the voters register and absence of voting materials (I will come to that in a follow-up post). Soludo who ran under PDP got 59,355 votes, Andy Uba of then Labour Party got 26,106votes, Nicholas Ukachukwu of HDP got20,777while Uche Ekwunife who ran under PPA got 9,595 votes. The other 19 minor candidatesgot a total of 10,631 votes. Rejected/invalid votes was16,685votes while the total number of registered voters in that election was 1,844,815 voters meaning that turn out was just 16.33% of registered voters. Peter Obi acknowledged the messed up voters register but quickly accepted INEC's "Solution to the mess" that people with voters card could vote even if their names were not on the voters register. This was a calculated plan by Maurice Iwu's INEC, Peter Obi and APGA to systematically rig the election because they knew that if the election was to be free and fair, Dr. Chris Ngige will trounce Peter Obi. Mind you, Ngige is from Idemili North, which is the LGA with the largest voting strength in Anambra State. In Part 2, we'll go into a little forensic analysis.

Michael Chibuzo®

113,514 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Data pulled from the Georgia 2020 Election and 2 other states on election night showed impossible vote spikes all over 136,000 votes for Biden when the consecutive averages all throughout the night ranged from 2,000 votes to 45,124 votes at the highest in Georgia. Vote Spikes in Georgia at 1:34 am: 136,155 vote spike: 84% for Joe Biden. 18,788 vote spike: 98% for Joe Biden. 13,035 vote spike: 77% for Joe Biden. 9,385 vote spike: 100% for Joe Biden. Vote dumps contained an average of 49% for Biden in Georgia. Vote Spike in Michigan at 5:31 am: 141,258 votes for Biden: 94% 5,968 votes for Trump: 4% These similar spikes happened in Georgia at 1:34 am, and in Wisconsin at 3:42 am. Vote Spike in Wisconsin at 3:42 am: 143,379 votes for Biden: 85% 25,163 votes for Trump: 15% These vote spikes all favored Biden in highly abnormal, unrealistic percentages, some 98% to 100% for Biden, indicating fraud. The Secretary of State would not provide exact time stamped data when requested, which is concerning, considering they tell you that it's the most transparent election. This is called a cover up. Moving on, the ballot totes that contained ballots were all supposed to have red security tamper-proof tags on them. Pictures and witnesses exposed 9 ballot totes without these tags on them. These "totes" or "suitcases" are very similar to the ones that were hidden under the tables at the State Farm Arena incident where ballots were pulled out from tables without security tags on them and counted throughout the night until Joe Biden cleared the margin of victory needed. Were these the 9 unsecure "totes" placed and pulled out from under the tables that were separate from all of the other ballots after they placed under the skirted table and put into position for the steal? Finally, how does this all comes together, with these unsecure totes and with fraudulent ballots? Bernard Talmadge owns a company called the "Operations Group, Ardleigh Group," and possibly, "Block by Block." Bernard Talmadge is a known ballot harvester who has been caught in Indiana, charges were brought against him and people who were for him, but were then dropped, from a corrupt court. Checks were found in 2018 all made out for $75-$80 dollars, made out from the Operations Group, and sometimes, the Ardleigh Group. An investigative reporter from Florida named Tom Lauder who did an investigation, and in interviewing witnesses he found that people who worked for the Operations Group and the Ardleigh Group were paid $15 per hour to produce ballots. They had a quota of 10 per-hour, which works out to 1 every 6 minutes. If your running door-to-door in an apartment complex, there is no possible way to get 1 ballot or registration every 6 mins. So what's really going on here? let's proceed. According to the Federal Election Commission, his company has taken in $9.1 MILLION for "field operations." $9.1 million divided by the $75 and multiply it by 50 votes, that's enough money to produce around 6 MILLION ballots. A spreadsheet shown in this presentation shows all the people who gave this company money, what's fascinating is that 1/3 of the $9 MILLION dollars came from the MAINE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. The Maine Democratic Party didn't even take in $3 million dollars during the 2019-2020 election. The evidence of the checks used to pay people were then sent out for background information and analysis, over 400 of them. What was found and what was interesting is that, of the checks that were provided, 2 checks were exactly the same, but one was from a company called "Dreams Enterprises," and the other check comes from the "Ardleigh Group." The signatures on both the checks are exactly the same, the routing numbers are the same, and the account numbers are the same, which can be seen in the video above. So, what kind of illegal ballot producing money laundering operation do we really have going on here? Then we know that foreign countries interfered in the 2020 election including fraudulent ballots, fake IDs, compromised election machines, with China's hands all over it. This is just another piece of the overall puzzle and steal of the 2020 election.

Data pulled from the Georgia 2020 Election and 2 other states on election night showed impossible vote spikes all over 136,000 votes for Biden when the consecutive averages all throughout the night ranged from 2,000 votes to 45,124 votes at the highest in Georgia. Vote Spikes in Georgia at 1:34 am: 136,155 vote spike: 84% for Joe Biden. 18,788 vote spike: 98% for Joe Biden. 13,035 vote spike: 77% for Joe Biden. 9,385 vote spike: 100% for Joe Biden. Vote dumps contained an average of 49% for Biden in Georgia. Vote Spike in Michigan at 5:31 am: 141,258 votes for Biden: 94% 5,968 votes for Trump: 4% These similar spikes happened in Georgia at 1:34 am, and in Wisconsin at 3:42 am. Vote Spike in Wisconsin at 3:42 am: 143,379 votes for Biden: 85% 25,163 votes for Trump: 15% These vote spikes all favored Biden in highly abnormal, unrealistic percentages, some 98% to 100% for Biden, indicating fraud. The Secretary of State would not provide exact time stamped data when requested, which is concerning, considering they tell you that it's the most transparent election. This is called a cover up. Moving on, the ballot totes that contained ballots were all supposed to have red security tamper-proof tags on them. Pictures and witnesses exposed 9 ballot totes without these tags on them. These "totes" or "suitcases" are very similar to the ones that were hidden under the tables at the State Farm Arena incident where ballots were pulled out from tables without security tags on them and counted throughout the night until Joe Biden cleared the margin of victory needed. Were these the 9 unsecure "totes" placed and pulled out from under the tables that were separate from all of the other ballots after they placed under the skirted table and put into position for the steal? Finally, how does this all comes together, with these unsecure totes and with fraudulent ballots? Bernard Talmadge owns a company called the "Operations Group, Ardleigh Group," and possibly, "Block by Block." Bernard Talmadge is a known ballot harvester who has been caught in Indiana, charges were brought against him and people who were for him, but were then dropped, from a corrupt court. Checks were found in 2018 all made out for $75-$80 dollars, made out from the Operations Group, and sometimes, the Ardleigh Group. An investigative reporter from Florida named Tom Lauder who did an investigation, and in interviewing witnesses he found that people who worked for the Operations Group and the Ardleigh Group were paid $15 per hour to produce ballots. They had a quota of 10 per-hour, which works out to 1 every 6 minutes. If your running door-to-door in an apartment complex, there is no possible way to get 1 ballot or registration every 6 mins. So what's really going on here? let's proceed. According to the Federal Election Commission, his company has taken in $9.1 MILLION for "field operations." $9.1 million divided by the $75 and multiply it by 50 votes, that's enough money to produce around 6 MILLION ballots. A spreadsheet shown in this presentation shows all the people who gave this company money, what's fascinating is that 1/3 of the $9 MILLION dollars came from the MAINE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. The Maine Democratic Party didn't even take in $3 million dollars during the 2019-2020 election. The evidence of the checks used to pay people were then sent out for background information and analysis, over 400 of them. What was found and what was interesting is that, of the checks that were provided, 2 checks were exactly the same, but one was from a company called "Dreams Enterprises," and the other check comes from the "Ardleigh Group." The signatures on both the checks are exactly the same, the routing numbers are the same, and the account numbers are the same, which can be seen in the video above. So, what kind of illegal ballot producing money laundering operation do we really have going on here? Then we know that foreign countries interfered in the 2020 election including fraudulent ballots, fake IDs, compromised election machines, with China's hands all over it. This is just another piece of the overall puzzle and steal of the 2020 election.

The SCIF

22,799 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat