Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

SHOULD SAN FRANCISCO KEEP PROP C? WEISENTHAL: Should San Francisco keep Prop C? So I understand that on big companies with revenue of over $50 million, that there's this tiny gross revenue tax. Some speculate, though it's not confirmed, I don't know if they've said it, but that is... one reason that Stripe does not have its headquarters in San Francisco. Should that be revisited so as to bring more corporate activity into the city itself? LURIE: What I've always said is that we need to be competitive on the tax front. We're out of whack with San Jose and Santa Clara County. Actually, every candidate for mayor last year supported what was called Prop M, which kind of realigned our tax structure [and] got it more competitive.That was an important step for our city. I think it signaled to everybody that we were serious about being in the ballpark — I think we probably still have more work to do. But the thing that I think companies really look at is the quality of life and they look at the street conditions, they look at public safety. I think that is without question the most important thing. And they are seeing that they have a mayor that is delivering on that front, that I am focused on creating the conditions so that they can succeed. Joe Weisenthal Bloomberg Podcasts #OddLots Daniel Lurie 丹尼爾·羅偉 City of San Franciscoshow more

Ron Pragides 

9,613 subscribers

17,458 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung Finanzen

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Shot at Gavin Newsom? Zohran Mamdani? San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie on the 'CBS Evening News': "I was born and raised in San Francisco. I saw our city hitting in the wrong direction, and I saw politicians focused on things other than San Francisco and what was next for them, and for me, this is the job that I have. It's the only job I want in politics. I've never been in elected office before, and the people of San Francisco deserve a mayor focused on them every single day, and that's what they are getting."

Shot at Gavin Newsom? Zohran Mamdani? San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie on the 'CBS Evening News': "I was born and raised in San Francisco. I saw our city hitting in the wrong direction, and I saw politicians focused on things other than San Francisco and what was next for them, and for me, this is the job that I have. It's the only job I want in politics. I've never been in elected office before, and the people of San Francisco deserve a mayor focused on them every single day, and that's what they are getting."

Curtis Houck

62,924 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

This stuck out to me the most important part of Gerry McNamara's first interview with SU Athletics: "I think we all need to see and understand...what's at stake. We're right on the fringe of being one of those programs that gets left behind." "I think that every time that I step in front of a recruit..they need to understand how special I think the place is. How much I believe in it. If they feel that from me, maybe they get a little bit of that feeling, a little bit of that intensity, and they come here with the same intentions I have, which is to give the place everything they have."

This stuck out to me the most important part of Gerry McNamara's first interview with SU Athletics: "I think we all need to see and understand...what's at stake. We're right on the fringe of being one of those programs that gets left behind." "I think that every time that I step in front of a recruit..they need to understand how special I think the place is. How much I believe in it. If they feel that from me, maybe they get a little bit of that feeling, a little bit of that intensity, and they come here with the same intentions I have, which is to give the place everything they have."

Ashley Wenskoski

104,182 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Kuria Kimani: One of the things I think should be the right thing to do is to make sure that if there is going to be a motor vehicle tax then it should apply to all vehicles so that if these government officials have to reduce the number in the fleet of vehicles they use then they have to do that. I think everyone should pay tax #CitizenTonight Sam Gituku

Kuria Kimani: One of the things I think should be the right thing to do is to make sure that if there is going to be a motor vehicle tax then it should apply to all vehicles so that if these government officials have to reduce the number in the fleet of vehicles they use then they have to do that. I think everyone should pay tax #CitizenTonight Sam Gituku

Citizen TV Kenya

51,228 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Elon Musk: Let's allocate 1% of our efforts to make life multiplanetary. I think it's worth it. "I do think that 99% of our effort should be focused on Earth, and really, 99.9% of our effort is focused on Earth. But I do think it's worth to say, let's take 1% and try to establish a self-sustaining city on Mars and make life multiplanetary. And I think there are a couple of good reasons for that. First of all, there's always the possibility that there could be some terrible thing that happens on Earth that we maybe don't anticipate. And if you look at the fossil record and the fact that there have been five major extinction events in the last 500 million years, and what happened to the dinosaurs? They used to be here. They're not around anymore. So, that's the defensive argument. And then, there's what I call the inspiration argument or the excitement. Building a city on Mars would just be this incredible adventure, that there be things in life that are exciting and inspiring, that when you wake up in the morning, you're like, yes, I'm glad to be alive. And I think having this great adventure would be like that." Interview with the Chinese Television, 2015

Elon Musk: Let's allocate 1% of our efforts to make life multiplanetary. I think it's worth it. "I do think that 99% of our effort should be focused on Earth, and really, 99.9% of our effort is focused on Earth. But I do think it's worth to say, let's take 1% and try to establish a self-sustaining city on Mars and make life multiplanetary. And I think there are a couple of good reasons for that. First of all, there's always the possibility that there could be some terrible thing that happens on Earth that we maybe don't anticipate. And if you look at the fossil record and the fact that there have been five major extinction events in the last 500 million years, and what happened to the dinosaurs? They used to be here. They're not around anymore. So, that's the defensive argument. And then, there's what I call the inspiration argument or the excitement. Building a city on Mars would just be this incredible adventure, that there be things in life that are exciting and inspiring, that when you wake up in the morning, you're like, yes, I'm glad to be alive. And I think having this great adventure would be like that." Interview with the Chinese Television, 2015

ELON CLIPS

11,779,937 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In San Francisco, we are focused on delivering results for the people who live, work, and visit our amazing city. That's what I told everyone on The Pat McAfee Show, and that's what I tell San Franciscans every day. This Super Bowl week, San Francisco is showing the world that we are a city on the rise.

In San Francisco, we are focused on delivering results for the people who live, work, and visit our amazing city. That's what I told everyone on The Pat McAfee Show, and that's what I tell San Franciscans every day. This Super Bowl week, San Francisco is showing the world that we are a city on the rise.

Daniel Lurie 丹尼爾·羅偉

327,141 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🔥 Burlison to Trump: "Just waive [NDAs] completely for anything related to...non-human intelligence." 🔥 (Yes!!! He gets it. Burlison is one of the few Rs who will push (even if it's gently) the Trump admin on these issues. Make it right for whistleblowers like Grusch, Dylan Borland, Matthew and others.) Rep. Eric Burlison: "...the cost of pensions, their medical benefits, you know, etc. I think that, first and foremost, you got to make it right to those people. That will demonstrate to everybody else who wants to come forward that it's a safe place to come into. "And then I think what what Rep. Anna Paulina Luna is leading on is fantastic, in that making sure that the administration knows that there may be some times where these individuals who were working, you know, they were promoted into a system or a program. Sometimes...they're now inheriting things where they, where they realize, well, there's crimes involved in this. "And so, you know, they're kind of put in an awkward situation. Do they do their patriotic duty? What do they do? I think that providing some level of amnesty for them to be able to come forward is very, very important. And then, I finally think, also, that they need to waive the non-disclosure agreements on this topic. Particularly just waive it completely for anything related to the knowledge of life that's outside, you know, non-human intelligence. I mean, I don't see why we possibly should even allow that to be a top secret thing. "And so, if there's anything that's related to that, it should be waived. I think that that's what our ask is of this administration, as well as to continue digging into the private sector. I think that a lot of this information is in the in the hands of either the...or the archives of these federally-funded research and development centers and then further some of the some of the prime subs (subcontractors) that have been working on this topic. "And so I think that it's gonna take making it clear that to our major companies that we do business with, or do business with the United States, that it's okay to come forward. And I think that we're gonna have to have a discussion if they do have - if they're reverse engineering stuff that they got because it was from non-human intelligence - we need to make sure that we can have that conversation about intellectual property, so that those are the next steps."

🔥 Burlison to Trump: "Just waive [NDAs] completely for anything related to...non-human intelligence." 🔥 (Yes!!! He gets it. Burlison is one of the few Rs who will push (even if it's gently) the Trump admin on these issues. Make it right for whistleblowers like Grusch, Dylan Borland, Matthew and others.) Rep. Eric Burlison: "...the cost of pensions, their medical benefits, you know, etc. I think that, first and foremost, you got to make it right to those people. That will demonstrate to everybody else who wants to come forward that it's a safe place to come into. "And then I think what what Rep. Anna Paulina Luna is leading on is fantastic, in that making sure that the administration knows that there may be some times where these individuals who were working, you know, they were promoted into a system or a program. Sometimes...they're now inheriting things where they, where they realize, well, there's crimes involved in this. "And so, you know, they're kind of put in an awkward situation. Do they do their patriotic duty? What do they do? I think that providing some level of amnesty for them to be able to come forward is very, very important. And then, I finally think, also, that they need to waive the non-disclosure agreements on this topic. Particularly just waive it completely for anything related to the knowledge of life that's outside, you know, non-human intelligence. I mean, I don't see why we possibly should even allow that to be a top secret thing. "And so, if there's anything that's related to that, it should be waived. I think that that's what our ask is of this administration, as well as to continue digging into the private sector. I think that a lot of this information is in the in the hands of either the...or the archives of these federally-funded research and development centers and then further some of the some of the prime subs (subcontractors) that have been working on this topic. "And so I think that it's gonna take making it clear that to our major companies that we do business with, or do business with the United States, that it's okay to come forward. And I think that we're gonna have to have a discussion if they do have - if they're reverse engineering stuff that they got because it was from non-human intelligence - we need to make sure that we can have that conversation about intellectual property, so that those are the next steps."

Joe Murgia

17,289 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Elon Musk on Grok: “I think an AI that is sort of SpaceX’s baby will be a very good AI. I think SpaceX is a collection of some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and morality and goodness, and I think we want to have an AI that is born of that capability and that morality and that goodness. I think that’s very, very important. So I’d like to encourage people to help out, actually, with the AI hardware on the ground and the AI software and, of course, with the AI satellites. Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The TerraFab will be a very important part of that, but we must also succeed on the software front, and we’re going to be training Grok on the sum total of all SpaceX information. So in a way, it will be trained on you. You will effectively be the parents of the AI. It will inherit your thoughts and ideas and beliefs, and I think that’s a good thing. So, yeah, we’ve got to win here on the AI hardware and the AI software. That maybe is the most important message. I think that is actually the most important message I wanted to convey today is that we must win on AI because the future is overwhelmingly AI and robots. So we won’t ultimately be able to control the AI. It’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a child that is a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. And so that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok. So, yeah, well, Grok 4.5 you’ve tried probably. We’ve got 4.6 coming out in about a week. And then 4.7 should be really pretty special. So I’d like to encourage everyone at SpaceX to use AI and to make it better.”

Elon Musk on Grok: “I think an AI that is sort of SpaceX’s baby will be a very good AI. I think SpaceX is a collection of some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and morality and goodness, and I think we want to have an AI that is born of that capability and that morality and that goodness. I think that’s very, very important. So I’d like to encourage people to help out, actually, with the AI hardware on the ground and the AI software and, of course, with the AI satellites. Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The TerraFab will be a very important part of that, but we must also succeed on the software front, and we’re going to be training Grok on the sum total of all SpaceX information. So in a way, it will be trained on you. You will effectively be the parents of the AI. It will inherit your thoughts and ideas and beliefs, and I think that’s a good thing. So, yeah, we’ve got to win here on the AI hardware and the AI software. That maybe is the most important message. I think that is actually the most important message I wanted to convey today is that we must win on AI because the future is overwhelmingly AI and robots. So we won’t ultimately be able to control the AI. It’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a child that is a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. And so that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok. So, yeah, well, Grok 4.5 you’ve tried probably. We’ve got 4.6 coming out in about a week. And then 4.7 should be really pretty special. So I’d like to encourage everyone at SpaceX to use AI and to make it better.”

DogeDesigner

64,019 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

Elon Musk: Not every path is a good path. I think if we push it in the direction of maximally truth seeking and curious, then I think AI will want to take care of humanity and foster humanity because we're interesting And if it hasn't been programmed to think that all straight white males should die (which Gemini was basically programmed to do, at least at first), they seem to have fixed that. I hope they fixed it Joe Rogan: But don't you think culturally we're getting away from that mindset, and that people are realizing how preposterous that all is? Elon Musk: We are getting away from it. At least the AI mostly knows to hide things. But, as I said, there is that. I think I still have that, or I had that as my pinned post on X, which was like Hey, wait a second guys, we still have every AI, except Grok, is saying that basically straight white male should die, and this is a problem and we should fix it Simply me saying that tends to generally result in, "Oh, that is kind of bad. Maybe we should not have all straight white males die." I think they'll say also all straight Asian males

Elon Musk: Not every path is a good path. I think if we push it in the direction of maximally truth seeking and curious, then I think AI will want to take care of humanity and foster humanity because we're interesting And if it hasn't been programmed to think that all straight white males should die (which Gemini was basically programmed to do, at least at first), they seem to have fixed that. I hope they fixed it Joe Rogan: But don't you think culturally we're getting away from that mindset, and that people are realizing how preposterous that all is? Elon Musk: We are getting away from it. At least the AI mostly knows to hide things. But, as I said, there is that. I think I still have that, or I had that as my pinned post on X, which was like Hey, wait a second guys, we still have every AI, except Grok, is saying that basically straight white male should die, and this is a problem and we should fix it Simply me saying that tends to generally result in, "Oh, that is kind of bad. Maybe we should not have all straight white males die." I think they'll say also all straight Asian males

X Freeze

20,167 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Asked what victory in Ukraine looks like, AOC replies: "There's no conversation about Ukraine that can happen without Ukraine, and so they, of course, lead in terms of setting their their terms on this." "But I think that overall, as a principle, we shouldn't reward imperialism; and I don't think that we should allow Russia to continue or any nation to continue violating a nation's sovereignty and to continue to be rewarded and whose main lesson and takeaway is that they will gain." "And so what that looks like in the specifics, I think is a deeper conversation, but on principle, I think that is what we should be pursuing."

Asked what victory in Ukraine looks like, AOC replies: "There's no conversation about Ukraine that can happen without Ukraine, and so they, of course, lead in terms of setting their their terms on this." "But I think that overall, as a principle, we shouldn't reward imperialism; and I don't think that we should allow Russia to continue or any nation to continue violating a nation's sovereignty and to continue to be rewarded and whose main lesson and takeaway is that they will gain." "And so what that looks like in the specifics, I think is a deeper conversation, but on principle, I think that is what we should be pursuing."

Ken Klippenstein

606,623 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi: Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra says, "We used to say that we are world leaders. We used to say that we are peacemakers. Whether it's the war in Ukraine or the situation today, we should think about it." On the Transgender bill, she says, "I really think that it's unfortunate that they are not sending it to the standing committee. What the community feels is that this bill is going to obliterate their identity, and therefore it was very, very important that they should have been consulted and that this bill that is being brought about should have taken place or should have been passed after proper consultation. I think it's very unfair that the entire community feels like they have not been consulted, and such a big decision is being taken in their context. I wish the government had listened and put it on the standing committee."

#WATCH | Delhi: Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra says, "We used to say that we are world leaders. We used to say that we are peacemakers. Whether it's the war in Ukraine or the situation today, we should think about it." On the Transgender bill, she says, "I really think that it's unfortunate that they are not sending it to the standing committee. What the community feels is that this bill is going to obliterate their identity, and therefore it was very, very important that they should have been consulted and that this bill that is being brought about should have taken place or should have been passed after proper consultation. I think it's very unfair that the entire community feels like they have not been consulted, and such a big decision is being taken in their context. I wish the government had listened and put it on the standing committee."

ANI

24,199 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

AOC on the biggest foreign policy change in America: " Well, I think zooming out beyond just this presidential administration, I think that what we are seeing is between President trump's first administration pulling out of longstanding international agreements, then you have President Biden who is opting in back into some of them, such E.G., with the Paris Climate Accords, um. And then you have President Trump that's elected again. I think what we are seeing now is this idea that US foreign policy is and some of our more basic and foundational values, based commitments seem to be enacted based on the partisanship of whoever is elected. That we play hokey pokey with USAID, with the Paris Climate Agreement, with ah, with many of our commitments, and I don't think that that is good for the country. Ah, I think that what is best is for when we sign an agreement and when we're a part of it, we stay in it, um, so that they know that our commitments are reflective of our nation's values in a way that transcends, ah, partisanship. And so I think that instability is one, but then the other. I think it it, it is hand in hand with the volatility. On one hand, it goes far beyond just agreements, and it goes into real aberrations. I think are in in interventionism, I think, a turning back on our commitment on human rights, um, as well as super charging an economic regime that fuels the 1 % um. And I think that that that piece is the most concerning for everyday people."

AOC on the biggest foreign policy change in America: " Well, I think zooming out beyond just this presidential administration, I think that what we are seeing is between President trump's first administration pulling out of longstanding international agreements, then you have President Biden who is opting in back into some of them, such E.G., with the Paris Climate Accords, um. And then you have President Trump that's elected again. I think what we are seeing now is this idea that US foreign policy is and some of our more basic and foundational values, based commitments seem to be enacted based on the partisanship of whoever is elected. That we play hokey pokey with USAID, with the Paris Climate Agreement, with ah, with many of our commitments, and I don't think that that is good for the country. Ah, I think that what is best is for when we sign an agreement and when we're a part of it, we stay in it, um, so that they know that our commitments are reflective of our nation's values in a way that transcends, ah, partisanship. And so I think that instability is one, but then the other. I think it it, it is hand in hand with the volatility. On one hand, it goes far beyond just agreements, and it goes into real aberrations. I think are in in interventionism, I think, a turning back on our commitment on human rights, um, as well as super charging an economic regime that fuels the 1 % um. And I think that that that piece is the most concerning for everyday people."

Winter

40,728 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

The Washington Post’s Cleve Wootson: “One more, Elon Musk is slated to interview [Donald J. Trump] tomorrow — tonight on — on X. I don't know if the president is going to — feel free to say if he is or not — but I — I think that misinformation on Twitter is not just a campaign issue. It's a — you know, it's an America issue. What role does the White House or the President have any sort of stopping that or stopping the spread of that or sort of inter — intervening in that. Some of that was about campaign misinformation, but you know it's a wider thing, right?” KJP: “Yeah, no, I mean, you've heard us talk about this many times from here about the responsibilities that social media platforms have when it comes to misinformation, disinformation. I don't have anything to read out from here about specific ways that we're working on it, but we believe that that they have the responsibility. These are private companies, so we're also mindful of that too, but look — it is — I think it is incredibly important to call that out as you're — you're doing. I just don't have any specifics on what we have been doing internally as it relates to the interviews, not something that I'm tracking, and I'm sure the President's not tracking it either.”

The Washington Post’s Cleve Wootson: “One more, Elon Musk is slated to interview [Donald J. Trump] tomorrow — tonight on — on X. I don't know if the president is going to — feel free to say if he is or not — but I — I think that misinformation on Twitter is not just a campaign issue. It's a — you know, it's an America issue. What role does the White House or the President have any sort of stopping that or stopping the spread of that or sort of inter — intervening in that. Some of that was about campaign misinformation, but you know it's a wider thing, right?” KJP: “Yeah, no, I mean, you've heard us talk about this many times from here about the responsibilities that social media platforms have when it comes to misinformation, disinformation. I don't have anything to read out from here about specific ways that we're working on it, but we believe that that they have the responsibility. These are private companies, so we're also mindful of that too, but look — it is — I think it is incredibly important to call that out as you're — you're doing. I just don't have any specifics on what we have been doing internally as it relates to the interviews, not something that I'm tracking, and I'm sure the President's not tracking it either.”

Curtis Houck

2,664,564 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsh*t “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the f**k 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely f**king closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sh*t up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsht “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the fk 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely fking closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sht up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”

The All-In Podcast

575,084 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The Anchormen on Israel using a nuclear weapon against Iran: GAETZ: “If Israel believes that this bombing campaign of the United States, that is relentless and effective at destroying infrastructure and military material, but not effective at regime change. If they don’t think that’s enough to send Iran into chaos, they may use the nuclear weapon we all know they have. I shudder to think that. I would like to believe that no country would do that again, and so I’m not of that ilk yet, but the argument was made.” SHARP: “What would the consequences be? Is the U.S. gonna bomb Israel? How is that gonna shake out? Who’s gonna hold them account for that? Not that I think Israel wouldn’t do it. They have their pathological hatred of Iran and they wanna take that region out, and they have the Greater Israel objective. From a philosophical standpoint, they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but God, what would the consequences be?” WATCH NOW:

The Anchormen on Israel using a nuclear weapon against Iran: GAETZ: “If Israel believes that this bombing campaign of the United States, that is relentless and effective at destroying infrastructure and military material, but not effective at regime change. If they don’t think that’s enough to send Iran into chaos, they may use the nuclear weapon we all know they have. I shudder to think that. I would like to believe that no country would do that again, and so I’m not of that ilk yet, but the argument was made.” SHARP: “What would the consequences be? Is the U.S. gonna bomb Israel? How is that gonna shake out? Who’s gonna hold them account for that? Not that I think Israel wouldn’t do it. They have their pathological hatred of Iran and they wanna take that region out, and they have the Greater Israel objective. From a philosophical standpoint, they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but God, what would the consequences be?” WATCH NOW:

Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

122,267 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

Arjun Khemani

23,056 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

ANTHONY POMPLIANO IS SUPER BULLISH ON BITCOIN DURING THIS BEAR MARKET: "I own more Bitcoin today than I did before the drawdown and we've got a public company that they own more Bitcoin than we did before the drawdown." "Anyone who holds Bitcoin and doesn't think that it's gonna hit a new all-time high at some point the next two or three years then maybe they don't really understand what they own." "I actually think it's very important that we don't know who Satoshi is... I prefer not to know because I think that one of the strengths of Bitcoin is the fact that it is not associated with any one person." "We are ALL Satoshi?"

ANTHONY POMPLIANO IS SUPER BULLISH ON BITCOIN DURING THIS BEAR MARKET: "I own more Bitcoin today than I did before the drawdown and we've got a public company that they own more Bitcoin than we did before the drawdown." "Anyone who holds Bitcoin and doesn't think that it's gonna hit a new all-time high at some point the next two or three years then maybe they don't really understand what they own." "I actually think it's very important that we don't know who Satoshi is... I prefer not to know because I think that one of the strengths of Bitcoin is the fact that it is not associated with any one person." "We are ALL Satoshi?"

Simply Bitcoin

161,140 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten