正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Should this have been called intentional grounding? Mahomes was still in the pocket and no receivers were nearby. #SBLVIII

32,153 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

9 条评论

Brent Randall 的头像
Brent Randall2 年前

Nope. Hit as he threw. They called grounding on another play where there was a receiver in the area. And the Niners scored on a trick play with two offensive picks and a lineman 8 yards downfield. Haters gotta come up with some new material. This nonsense is getting boring.

nacho is the number one 的头像
nacho is the number one2 年前

Wow. So KC Oline can just hold every play. Not a single penalty

Vincent Pensabene 的头像
Vincent Pensabene2 年前

You can't call intentional grounding on a downfield pass. Ball passed line of scrimmage

John Pretino 的头像
John Pretino2 年前

What about the one they did call against KC when he was clearly outside the hash marks and a receiver was about 5 yards away? Also, that horse collar was actually the jersey that was pulled and not the shoulder pads. KC got screwed much more than SF!!

J Bro 的头像
J Bro2 年前

Absolutely obvious. Horrific no call. But expected

Joshua Dillon 的头像
Joshua Dillon2 年前

Nope. Contact affected the throw trajectory and there is an eligible receiver two yards beyond the LoS. The fact that the ball goes 20 feet over his head isn't relevant.

OTM 的头像
OTM2 年前

No there was a receiver within 5 yards

Kevin 的头像
Kevin2 年前

Probably a makeup call for the other one 🤷‍♂️

Spartan 的头像
Spartan2 年前

Vinovich is the same guy that had the no call on the Saints receiver being blasted be fire the pass got to him, which sent the Rams to a home game Super Bowl. Yep - it’s fixed.

相关视频