Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

should this have been intentional grounding?

1,885,816 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Jeremy Berman
Jeremy Bermanvor 2 Jahren

NO! The NFL has to tell refs to take intent into account. So clear that it was just a miscommunication and this isn’t in the spirit of the rule…

Profilbild von MrLawgiver
MrLawgivervor 2 Jahren

No way. Its clearly a miscommunication in route, refs need to use a little logic

Profilbild von Timothy Johnson
Timothy Johnsonvor 2 Jahren

ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!! If Mahomes did that, the refs would probably call Holding on the Defense—Refs not even trying to hide it anymore—UNREAL!!!

Profilbild von Burrow's Fall Guy
Burrow's Fall Guyvor 2 Jahren

The rules say yes but probably didn’t need to be called

Profilbild von Paul Bovi
Paul Bovivor 2 Jahren

This sets a new precedent. There was no imminent loss of yardage while the receiver clearly broke off the route. Those that think this was grounding don't know the rule.

Profilbild von HurdleThis🦬
HurdleThis🦬vor 2 Jahren

@NFLOfficiating is ruining this game and this sport. Trash ass @nflcommish needs to fix this shit now!

Profilbild von Big Joe
Big Joevor 2 Jahren

There was no real immediate pressure on Allen either. It was clearly a route that the receiver cut off because the corner had over the top leverage and Allen wanted the fade

Profilbild von 𝐆𝐄𝐄𝐙𝐘✎ツ
𝐆𝐄𝐄𝐙𝐘✎ツvor 2 Jahren

By the book, yes it is

Profilbild von Charles James
Charles Jamesvor 2 Jahren

Intent should matter. It’s a miscommunication not grounding. Spirit of the rule should matter.

Profilbild von Wes Gade
Wes Gadevor 2 Jahren

Doesn't Intentional Grounding have to be Intentional?

Ähnliche Videos