Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

should this have been intentional grounding?

1,885,820 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Jeremy Berman
Jeremy Berman2 лет назад

NO! The NFL has to tell refs to take intent into account. So clear that it was just a miscommunication and this isn’t in the spirit of the rule…

Фото профиля MrLawgiver
MrLawgiver2 лет назад

No way. Its clearly a miscommunication in route, refs need to use a little logic

Фото профиля Timothy Johnson
Timothy Johnson2 лет назад

ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!! If Mahomes did that, the refs would probably call Holding on the Defense—Refs not even trying to hide it anymore—UNREAL!!!

Фото профиля Burrow's Fall Guy
Burrow's Fall Guy2 лет назад

The rules say yes but probably didn’t need to be called

Фото профиля Paul Bovi
Paul Bovi2 лет назад

This sets a new precedent. There was no imminent loss of yardage while the receiver clearly broke off the route. Those that think this was grounding don't know the rule.

Фото профиля HurdleThis🦬
HurdleThis🦬2 лет назад

@NFLOfficiating is ruining this game and this sport. Trash ass @nflcommish needs to fix this shit now!

Фото профиля Big Joe
Big Joe2 лет назад

There was no real immediate pressure on Allen either. It was clearly a route that the receiver cut off because the corner had over the top leverage and Allen wanted the fade

Фото профиля 𝐆𝐄𝐄𝐙𝐘✎ツ
𝐆𝐄𝐄𝐙𝐘✎ツ2 лет назад

By the book, yes it is

Фото профиля Charles James
Charles James2 лет назад

Intent should matter. It’s a miscommunication not grounding. Spirit of the rule should matter.

Фото профиля Wes Gade
Wes Gade2 лет назад

Doesn't Intentional Grounding have to be Intentional?

Похожие видео