Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

should this have been intentional grounding?

1,885,820 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

10 Yorum

Jeremy Berman profil fotoğrafı
Jeremy Berman2 yıl önce

NO! The NFL has to tell refs to take intent into account. So clear that it was just a miscommunication and this isn’t in the spirit of the rule…

MrLawgiver profil fotoğrafı
MrLawgiver2 yıl önce

No way. Its clearly a miscommunication in route, refs need to use a little logic

Timothy Johnson profil fotoğrafı
Timothy Johnson2 yıl önce

ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!! If Mahomes did that, the refs would probably call Holding on the Defense—Refs not even trying to hide it anymore—UNREAL!!!

Burrow's Fall Guy profil fotoğrafı
Burrow's Fall Guy2 yıl önce

The rules say yes but probably didn’t need to be called

Paul Bovi profil fotoğrafı
Paul Bovi2 yıl önce

This sets a new precedent. There was no imminent loss of yardage while the receiver clearly broke off the route. Those that think this was grounding don't know the rule.

HurdleThis🦬 profil fotoğrafı
HurdleThis🦬2 yıl önce

@NFLOfficiating is ruining this game and this sport. Trash ass @nflcommish needs to fix this shit now!

Big Joe profil fotoğrafı
Big Joe2 yıl önce

There was no real immediate pressure on Allen either. It was clearly a route that the receiver cut off because the corner had over the top leverage and Allen wanted the fade

𝐆𝐄𝐄𝐙𝐘✎ツ profil fotoğrafı
𝐆𝐄𝐄𝐙𝐘✎ツ2 yıl önce

By the book, yes it is

Charles James profil fotoğrafı
Charles James2 yıl önce

Intent should matter. It’s a miscommunication not grounding. Spirit of the rule should matter.

Wes Gade profil fotoğrafı
Wes Gade2 yıl önce

Doesn't Intentional Grounding have to be Intentional?

Benzer Videolar