正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

should this have been intentional grounding?

1,885,821 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Jeremy Berman 的头像
Jeremy Berman2 年前

NO! The NFL has to tell refs to take intent into account. So clear that it was just a miscommunication and this isn’t in the spirit of the rule…

MrLawgiver 的头像
MrLawgiver2 年前

No way. Its clearly a miscommunication in route, refs need to use a little logic

Timothy Johnson 的头像
Timothy Johnson2 年前

ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!! If Mahomes did that, the refs would probably call Holding on the Defense—Refs not even trying to hide it anymore—UNREAL!!!

Burrow's Fall Guy 的头像
Burrow's Fall Guy2 年前

The rules say yes but probably didn’t need to be called

Paul Bovi 的头像
Paul Bovi2 年前

This sets a new precedent. There was no imminent loss of yardage while the receiver clearly broke off the route. Those that think this was grounding don't know the rule.

HurdleThis🦬 的头像
HurdleThis🦬2 年前

@NFLOfficiating is ruining this game and this sport. Trash ass @nflcommish needs to fix this shit now!

Big Joe 的头像
Big Joe2 年前

There was no real immediate pressure on Allen either. It was clearly a route that the receiver cut off because the corner had over the top leverage and Allen wanted the fade

𝐆𝐄𝐄𝐙𝐘✎ツ 的头像
𝐆𝐄𝐄𝐙𝐘✎ツ2 年前

By the book, yes it is

Charles James 的头像
Charles James2 年前

Intent should matter. It’s a miscommunication not grounding. Spirit of the rule should matter.

Wes Gade 的头像
Wes Gade2 年前

Doesn't Intentional Grounding have to be Intentional?

相关视频