Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Show this to anyone who question's Starmer's commitment to National Security Keir Starmer, "Before I came into politics in 2015 I was the Director of Public Prosecution. So I had to work with our intelligence and security services on national security issues" "I had to deal with operations where... we were taking down terrorist gangs that wanted to destroy the very fabric of our society" "One of our operations involved a plot to blow up seven airplanes in the middle of the Atlantic at the same time" "Can you imagine the devastation that would be caused? Not just to thins country but across the world" "We had to take real time decisions in those cases that I was part. "So I don't need lectures from anyone on national security or the important of protecting lives in this country"show more

Farrukh

126,218 subscribers

319,638 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

34 Comments

Jake James #FBPE #RejoinEU #FBPA2 years ago

Outstanding from Starmer. Playing to his strengths. Discussing real world life and death decision-making. Not a Tory with a three-word slogan standing on the beach at Dover pushing a crackpot Rwanda scheme. As ever, won't get reported on @BBCNews or in MSM.

Jane and Zoé 🇪🇺 🇧🇪🇮🇪🇵🇹🇫🇷🇮🇹🇿🇦2 years ago

Starmer is just better at this stuff than Sunak

JointheDots2 years ago

Show this to anyone who wonders why a billionaire wants to take the paltry ( in relationship to personal wealth ) sum a PM is paid.

pat parker2 years ago

Give me Keir any time a safe pair of hands

Justine2 years ago

@SkyNews I hope you're using this clip

GY2 years ago

Here here! Bring on a Starmer government ❤️

Will Harley 🇧🇪🇬🇧2 years ago

*aeroplanes

Steve2 years ago

Shame he didn’t deal with the grooming gangs when he had the chance

lily sherwood2 years ago

Well said How dare Sunak challenge Stamer on national security saying the UK would not be safe. I for one would feel significantly safer with Starmer leading us than him the man who thinks only of himself & who changes his mind daily Sunaks clueless & makes me feel v insecure

FurtherEdDude2 years ago

It’s going to be a wonderful change having a fully grown adult at PM again. We need to get away from the unprofessional stain the tories have left on our government.

Viscount Pontypandy 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 🇪🇺, #NHS 💙2 years ago

He cannot claim he has a cast iron commitment to national security so long as he takes both money and counsel from a foreign state - Israel. It is no different to the Tories and Russian oligarchs! The man lacks integrity & credibility on this critically important issue.

Jane Hughes2 years ago

I think rishi forgets keir was a human rights lawyer

Turpin Antiques2 years ago

No mention of jimmy savile then

paul bishop2 years ago

As DPP, by the time you may have been involved in prosecution, surely the plot must have been already uncovered, and the plotters already in custody. Not sure this counts as *relevant experience*, but you have to work with what you have, I suppose.

Christine Dowson 🇪🇺🇺🇦✊🏽2 years ago

So put that in your Spider-Man lunch box imp and stop saying ridiculous things about kier starmer and concentrate on your own failings!

Doris #CeasefireNow Vote #TUSC2 years ago

@paulio80410204 Trust me, I have no doubt Starner is working for and purely in the interests of himself and the establishment #DontVoteLabour #RedTories

Will2 years ago

Yet the Post Office scandal that erupted during his time just passed him by …

Patricia Bee2 years ago

My word. This man is off his rocker and dangerous. Who exactly are we at threat from?This is pure propaganda to frighten people.

terrysteel. 🇬🇧🇵🇹🏌️‍♂️🦉2 years ago

Is this a flip or a flop as he changes his position on something yet again

Jimmy2 years ago

Real time decisions like "one sugar or two boss?"

Truth Finder General ♿️ datatruthfinder.bsky.socia2 years ago

@BBCNews @Channel4News

James Woodfield2 years ago

Yeah but the Tories have got Grant Shapps..

Michael Gillespie2 years ago

For too long, we’ve had an age of politics that has been poisoned by perceived charismatic politicians who were essentially bluffers & charlatans. In my opinion, it’s time to put politics in the hands of serious people. Say what you like about Starmer’s persona but he is serious.

Il puffino punk 🇮🇹2 years ago

This is just willy-waving bullshit from the man already in Zionist pay.

Schards2 years ago

Keir Starmer campaigned for Jeremy Corbyn to be prime minister. That's how much he cares about national security

debbbee2 years ago

Can’t make my mind up if he’s starting to look cool? Probably overthinking it , must be the glasses!! ( his not mine )

John Bruce2 years ago

Sorry, totally and always committed to nuclear disarmament

Jane Hughes2 years ago

You tell them sir

benjamin2 years ago

#mypm

Auntie Mem 🤘🌈 🇵🇸🏳️‍🌈 🇺🇦2 years ago

Starmer looking every inch the prime minister. Brilliant. Contrast this with the worm taking over reform and the grasping tories-no contests

imavillafan2 years ago

Firstly, if you believe a word of this you're so thick you've set. Secondly, with the USA determined to provoke WW3, the last thing the UK needs is a genocide-enabler who boasts about being willing to press the nuclear button.

Stuart Lacey2 years ago

You have to feel sorry for the Tories. Literally nothing they have can damage Labour. The Cons have been so incompetent over the last 4 1/2 years that, at this point, they should just fade away quietly.

Elizanne Macneil2 years ago

I question the West’s industrial military complex and the rules based order in creating the terror in the first place. Only to have it rebound on us. As Guterres said nothing happens in a vacuum

Bang, bang, bugger2 years ago

Was he on one knee at the time?

Related Videos

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

70,473 views • 11 months ago

Julie Etchingham, "Do you really think that Keir Starmer is a threat to our National Security?" Rishi Sunak, "I dont think the Labour party can be trusted to keep our country as safe as the Conservatives" Keir Starmer, "Shame on you" Rishi Sunak, "The world is a more dangerous place" Keir Starmer, "Shame on you.. Shocking" Rishi Sunak, "You can trust the Conservatives with our countries security" Keir Starmer, "Before I was a politician I was working on National Security with the Crown Prosecution Services.. Rishi Sunak was betting on the country during the financial crisis" Rishi Sunak, "I would rather have my job than work for extremists" Keir Starmer, "The Crown Prosecution Services?" Absolutely disgusting and pathetic attack line from Rishi Sunak, what a vile human being #ITVDebate

Julie Etchingham, "Do you really think that Keir Starmer is a threat to our National Security?" Rishi Sunak, "I dont think the Labour party can be trusted to keep our country as safe as the Conservatives" Keir Starmer, "Shame on you" Rishi Sunak, "The world is a more dangerous place" Keir Starmer, "Shame on you.. Shocking" Rishi Sunak, "You can trust the Conservatives with our countries security" Keir Starmer, "Before I was a politician I was working on National Security with the Crown Prosecution Services.. Rishi Sunak was betting on the country during the financial crisis" Rishi Sunak, "I would rather have my job than work for extremists" Keir Starmer, "The Crown Prosecution Services?" Absolutely disgusting and pathetic attack line from Rishi Sunak, what a vile human being #ITVDebate

Farrukh

785,519 views • 2 years ago

🚨 Scott Bessent is AWESOME! Q: Did you expect as Treasury Secretary to be so involved in US national security? SCOTT BESSENT: "This was the problem with past administrations. We separated economic security from national security. I came into office saying — economic security is national security!" "A group of us are running as HARD as we can over the next few years to take away ANY leverage our adversaries might have against us." He's crushing it and will go down in history as one of the greatest EVER! I don't think many people expected the Treasury Secretary to be so pivotal in Trump 2.0. WE LOVE BESSENT 🇺🇸

🚨 Scott Bessent is AWESOME! Q: Did you expect as Treasury Secretary to be so involved in US national security? SCOTT BESSENT: "This was the problem with past administrations. We separated economic security from national security. I came into office saying — economic security is national security!" "A group of us are running as HARD as we can over the next few years to take away ANY leverage our adversaries might have against us." He's crushing it and will go down in history as one of the greatest EVER! I don't think many people expected the Treasury Secretary to be so pivotal in Trump 2.0. WE LOVE BESSENT 🇺🇸

Eric Daugherty

447,687 views • 28 days ago

#WATCH | On PM Modi reducing his security convoy, former J&K DGP SP Vaid says, "What PM Modi said was a message for the entire country. PM reducing his security convoy was symbolic for the country that when a PM can do this, everyone must try to save fuel...But our PM is one of the highest-threatened persons in the world. We cannot compromise with his security. The country and the world need him. Terror outfits in our neighbouring country or the pan-Islamic international terror outfits pose a grave threat to him. I think there should be no compromise with his security. However, SPG is very professional, one of the best in the world. So, I don't think they need any suggestions from us. But I would certainly say that PM is very important for the country and there should be no compromise with his security..."

#WATCH | On PM Modi reducing his security convoy, former J&K DGP SP Vaid says, "What PM Modi said was a message for the entire country. PM reducing his security convoy was symbolic for the country that when a PM can do this, everyone must try to save fuel...But our PM is one of the highest-threatened persons in the world. We cannot compromise with his security. The country and the world need him. Terror outfits in our neighbouring country or the pan-Islamic international terror outfits pose a grave threat to him. I think there should be no compromise with his security. However, SPG is very professional, one of the best in the world. So, I don't think they need any suggestions from us. But I would certainly say that PM is very important for the country and there should be no compromise with his security..."

ANI

21,210 views • 4 months ago

In a more dangerous world, our national security is the guarantor of our economic security. Rachel Reeves and I are determined to bring together investors in a new partnership that delivers for our security, for our economy and for hard working families across the country.

In a more dangerous world, our national security is the guarantor of our economic security. Rachel Reeves and I are determined to bring together investors in a new partnership that delivers for our security, for our economy and for hard working families across the country.

John Healey

83,195 views • 5 months ago

Every time I ask a question to those on the Signal chain about whether classified information was shared, I get slippery semantics. This was a reckless breach of security at the hands of our top national security officials. Responsibility needs to be taken. Period.

Every time I ask a question to those on the Signal chain about whether classified information was shared, I get slippery semantics. This was a reckless breach of security at the hands of our top national security officials. Responsibility needs to be taken. Period.

Senator Angus King

112,900 views • 1 year ago

The Department of Homeland Security was created in the aftermath of September 11th and was created to ensure a coordinated effort for protecting our homeland. The time for politics is over. This is about our national security. Everyone needs to vote in favor of funding our government and the Department of Homeland Security to ensure they have all of the resources necessary to protect the homeland.

The Department of Homeland Security was created in the aftermath of September 11th and was created to ensure a coordinated effort for protecting our homeland. The time for politics is over. This is about our national security. Everyone needs to vote in favor of funding our government and the Department of Homeland Security to ensure they have all of the resources necessary to protect the homeland.

Mike Lawler

16,414 views • 7 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump has instructed incoming acting Director of National Intelligence Bill Pulte to IMMEDIATELY start FIRING and downsizing the Deep State LFG! No wonder they're panicking over Pulte 🔥 "Just like they did on Border Funding, the Radical Left Dumocrats are trying to take our National Security hostage because of unrelated issues. They should stop playing politics with the safety of our Great Country. I have named William Pulte to be Acting Director of National Intelligence, who will take over on June 19th, and have asked him to execute the immediate and needed downsizing of the office, reverting staff to their home agencies. At the same time, I am looking for a permanent ODNI Nominee with experience in National Security. FISA 702 is very important to our Military, and keeping the American People safe, especially during the World Cup and America250 Celebrations. If nothing is done, this important Law will expire this week. I am asking Congress to send me a short-term extension of FISA to provide time for the selection and confirmation of a permanent Head of the Agency. I would like to thank Director Pulte for his time and commitment. President DONALD J. TRUMP"

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump has instructed incoming acting Director of National Intelligence Bill Pulte to IMMEDIATELY start FIRING and downsizing the Deep State LFG! No wonder they're panicking over Pulte 🔥 "Just like they did on Border Funding, the Radical Left Dumocrats are trying to take our National Security hostage because of unrelated issues. They should stop playing politics with the safety of our Great Country. I have named William Pulte to be Acting Director of National Intelligence, who will take over on June 19th, and have asked him to execute the immediate and needed downsizing of the office, reverting staff to their home agencies. At the same time, I am looking for a permanent ODNI Nominee with experience in National Security. FISA 702 is very important to our Military, and keeping the American People safe, especially during the World Cup and America250 Celebrations. If nothing is done, this important Law will expire this week. I am asking Congress to send me a short-term extension of FISA to provide time for the selection and confirmation of a permanent Head of the Agency. I would like to thank Director Pulte for his time and commitment. President DONALD J. TRUMP"

Eric Daugherty

190,215 views • 3 months ago

President Ruto: I thank our security officers who were on duty today for applying themselves to the best of their abilities in the defence of Kenya and its people. I have directed all organs of our national security to thwart any attempt by criminals to undermine the security and stability of Kenya.

President Ruto: I thank our security officers who were on duty today for applying themselves to the best of their abilities in the defence of Kenya and its people. I have directed all organs of our national security to thwart any attempt by criminals to undermine the security and stability of Kenya.

NTV Kenya

295,308 views • 2 years ago

🚨David Pyne: ‘The war on Iran has show the EXTREME NECESSITY for the US to cut off all security assistance to Israel.’ ‘I think that it’s been said that we need to divorce ourselves from Israel. I think that’s true. I think we need to end our alliance with Israel. I think if the US were a bonafide neutral power in the region, with regards to the ongoing Israeli-Iran military disputes, I think we can accomplish a lot more. Iran, much like Russia, is essentially a manufactured enemy… President Trump is principally to blame, not Benjamin Netanyahu, because he is, after all, the President of the United States, one of the top three nuclear superpowers in the world. And he should show a degree of independence from Netanyahu and put America first. But instead he chose to put Israel first and America’s national security last by starting this regional war of aggression against Iran.’ -David Pyne, Deputy Director of National Operations of the Taskforce on National & Homeland Security. He joins us for Monday’s episode of Going Underground Don’t miss it, follow our Rumble channel, link below in the replies👇 David Pyne 🇺🇸

🚨David Pyne: ‘The war on Iran has show the EXTREME NECESSITY for the US to cut off all security assistance to Israel.’ ‘I think that it’s been said that we need to divorce ourselves from Israel. I think that’s true. I think we need to end our alliance with Israel. I think if the US were a bonafide neutral power in the region, with regards to the ongoing Israeli-Iran military disputes, I think we can accomplish a lot more. Iran, much like Russia, is essentially a manufactured enemy… President Trump is principally to blame, not Benjamin Netanyahu, because he is, after all, the President of the United States, one of the top three nuclear superpowers in the world. And he should show a degree of independence from Netanyahu and put America first. But instead he chose to put Israel first and America’s national security last by starting this regional war of aggression against Iran.’ -David Pyne, Deputy Director of National Operations of the Taskforce on National & Homeland Security. He joins us for Monday’s episode of Going Underground Don’t miss it, follow our Rumble channel, link below in the replies👇 David Pyne 🇺🇸

Going Underground

21,072 views • 5 months ago

This is a very common sense take on immigration and Somalia. "Yeah I certainly don't want Somalian immigrants living in my neighborhood or in this country for that matter, I don't think anyone really does." "In fact, most of the world doesn't provide the right kind of people that you'd want immigrating to your country." "Most people coming to this country want to take advantage of the existing society that we have and just live in the land of milk and honey." "Somalia does not breed the type of people who want to meaningfully contribute to our society." Anyone see anything they disagree with?

This is a very common sense take on immigration and Somalia. "Yeah I certainly don't want Somalian immigrants living in my neighborhood or in this country for that matter, I don't think anyone really does." "In fact, most of the world doesn't provide the right kind of people that you'd want immigrating to your country." "Most people coming to this country want to take advantage of the existing society that we have and just live in the land of milk and honey." "Somalia does not breed the type of people who want to meaningfully contribute to our society." Anyone see anything they disagree with?

AmericanPapaBear™

35,027 views • 9 months ago

Before politics I dedicated my life to national security. Now, in politics, it’s at the heart of every decision I make and it always will be. National security is the foundation of a thriving nation.

Before politics I dedicated my life to national security. Now, in politics, it’s at the heart of every decision I make and it always will be. National security is the foundation of a thriving nation.

Mike Tapp MP

19,662 views • 2 months ago

Travis Kalanick says all his employees' families thought they were in the CIA while the company was in stealth "We went stealth on this company eight years ago." "I had a whole strategy, like a deck that I would teach with my leadership team, and we called it "be uniconic," and we worked our asses off to be unknown." "So up until a few months ago, I had thousands of employees. Not a single one of them was listed on LinkedIn." "Think about that. How f*cking crazy is that? That is one of the weirdest things of all time." "All my employees' families thought they were in the CIA." "But what happened was, at the end of my time at Uber, the world was getting weird, business became politics, and you were starting to make decisions based on what the New York Times was going to say tomorrow. And I just wanted to wake up in the morning and build."

Travis Kalanick says all his employees' families thought they were in the CIA while the company was in stealth "We went stealth on this company eight years ago." "I had a whole strategy, like a deck that I would teach with my leadership team, and we called it "be uniconic," and we worked our asses off to be unknown." "So up until a few months ago, I had thousands of employees. Not a single one of them was listed on LinkedIn." "Think about that. How f*cking crazy is that? That is one of the weirdest things of all time." "All my employees' families thought they were in the CIA." "But what happened was, at the end of my time at Uber, the world was getting weird, business became politics, and you were starting to make decisions based on what the New York Times was going to say tomorrow. And I just wanted to wake up in the morning and build."

Fireside Alpha

37,115 views • 16 days ago

Incoming national security adviser, Michael Waltz on TikTok: “I don't want to get ahead of our executive orders but we're going to create the space to — to put that deal in place.”

Incoming national security adviser, Michael Waltz on TikTok: “I don't want to get ahead of our executive orders but we're going to create the space to — to put that deal in place.”

Annmarie Hordern

15,145 views • 1 year ago

I congratulated our lyceum students on taking the oath on the occasion of the Day of Defenders of Ukraine. Thank you for choosing this work, this service, this mission – to be Ukraine’s defense, to be Ukraine’s strength, to be Ukraine’s hope. We very much want to end this war, and we are doing everything to make that happen – to bring peace to Ukraine and guarantee security. And we have to make it through this. And we are doing everything so that you can become security guarantors for a Ukraine that is already at peace. I wish this for you, and I believe that you will become truly outstanding officers of the Ukrainian military, of our Defense and Security Forces. Thank you! I am proud of you and of all our warriors! May luck and strength be with you! Glory to Ukraine!

I congratulated our lyceum students on taking the oath on the occasion of the Day of Defenders of Ukraine. Thank you for choosing this work, this service, this mission – to be Ukraine’s defense, to be Ukraine’s strength, to be Ukraine’s hope. We very much want to end this war, and we are doing everything to make that happen – to bring peace to Ukraine and guarantee security. And we have to make it through this. And we are doing everything so that you can become security guarantors for a Ukraine that is already at peace. I wish this for you, and I believe that you will become truly outstanding officers of the Ukrainian military, of our Defense and Security Forces. Thank you! I am proud of you and of all our warriors! May luck and strength be with you! Glory to Ukraine!

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

197,233 views • 2 days ago

National security or social security? Today, the Prime Minister said national security 'can’t come at the expense of social security'. In an increasingly dangerous world, the first duty of any Government must be to defend our country.

National security or social security? Today, the Prime Minister said national security 'can’t come at the expense of social security'. In an increasingly dangerous world, the first duty of any Government must be to defend our country.

Jack Rankin MP 🇬🇧

19,599 views • 24 days ago

Hungary's FM Szijjártó also had a great answer when asked about his country's relation with China, calling China "a huge chance and a huge opportunity" and revealing (which I didn't know) that actually the key reason why the Chinese invest in Hungary is "because of the Germans", i.e. to supply German companies that also have production facilities in Hungary. This was also brilliant: "Here again rationality is needed. We look at China, the cooperation with China as a chance, as an opportunity, as something that helps Hungary economy grow, as something that helps Hungarian economy to move to the next dimension, to be upgraded technologically speaking And when I listen to those who say China is a threat, then I raise my question: don't those countries have secret services or something? Because we have our secret services, we have our national security structure and if this structure signals any threat or danger to us regarding some action, then we don't do that. So what happens between us and China is absolutely, absolutely advantageous from the perspective of our national interest and national economy. What would not be in our national interest because of security reasons for example, then we would not do it. So I mean this is so simple from our perspective." I really wish this type of rationality was more generalized in Europe instead of the mind-numbing "good vs evil" ideology that's so pervasive at the moment...

Hungary's FM Szijjártó also had a great answer when asked about his country's relation with China, calling China "a huge chance and a huge opportunity" and revealing (which I didn't know) that actually the key reason why the Chinese invest in Hungary is "because of the Germans", i.e. to supply German companies that also have production facilities in Hungary. This was also brilliant: "Here again rationality is needed. We look at China, the cooperation with China as a chance, as an opportunity, as something that helps Hungary economy grow, as something that helps Hungarian economy to move to the next dimension, to be upgraded technologically speaking And when I listen to those who say China is a threat, then I raise my question: don't those countries have secret services or something? Because we have our secret services, we have our national security structure and if this structure signals any threat or danger to us regarding some action, then we don't do that. So what happens between us and China is absolutely, absolutely advantageous from the perspective of our national interest and national economy. What would not be in our national interest because of security reasons for example, then we would not do it. So I mean this is so simple from our perspective." I really wish this type of rationality was more generalized in Europe instead of the mind-numbing "good vs evil" ideology that's so pervasive at the moment...

Arnaud Bertrand

111,420 views • 2 years ago