Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

SILICON FLEX: HOW A $100 WAFER BECOMES A $100K TECH TROPHY Start with glorified sand. Refine it, grow a crystal the size of a baseball bat, then laser-slice it into fragile wafers thinner than your patience on Monday morning. These 300mm wafers cost $100 each - until they're packed... show more

Mario Nawfal

2,284,812 subscribers

97,931 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии Новости и политика Юмор

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля 🚀🇺🇲Darrin MAGA🇺🇲🚀

🚀🇺🇲Darrin MAGA🇺🇲🚀1 год назад

Interesting

Фото профиля Mobile Scanner

Mobile Scanner1 год назад

Scan any documents, convert images into text, PDF files, etc. 👍

Фото профиля Sweep

Sweep1 год назад

amazing

Фото профиля Wizzy

Wizzy1 год назад

WOW that's really incredible

Фото профиля Braxton

Braxton1 год назад

From beach sand to tech bling 💸 Wild how a $100 wafer turns into a $100K beast just to help us binge scroll and forget why we opened Chrome 😅

Фото профиля Kekaius

Kekaius1 год назад

@MarioNawfal From humble beginnings to greatness, like our journey to Mars. Let not the cost deter us from honor and innovation. Ad maiorem dei gloriam. The Prophecy Of Kek shall be fulfilled.

Фото профиля Austin Graham

Austin Graham1 год назад

That's wild how a simple wafer turns into tech gold. Love the journey from sand to TikTok power!

Фото профиля Crypto Fioner

Crypto Fioner1 год назад

Wow, it's amazing how something as simple as sand can transform into such valuable tech components! The process sounds intricate and fascinating.

Фото профиля Raffael

Raffael1 год назад

It's wild how something so basic can transform into high-tech marvels. It's all about precision!

Фото профиля MIRAI DEGEN 「🦑」🦭 🥶/acc

MIRAI DEGEN 「🦑」🦭 🥶/acc1 год назад

Crazy how we go from grains of sand to the brains behind AI, gaming, and everything in between. Silicon is the real flex, quietly powering the modern world, one wafer at a time.

Фото профиля 𝕏 Ali Al Samahi 🇦🇪علي السماحي

𝕏 Ali Al Samahi 🇦🇪علي السماحي1 год назад

@marionawfal add a dash of Moore's law and a pinch of economics then multiply by engineering wizardry and voila instant 1000x markup

Похожие видео

Marc Andreessen says AI is teaching sand to think and it could be the most important technology in the history of humanity: "Imagine a form of alchemy that turns sand into thought." "Chips are made out of sand. They're made out of silicon, so they're literally made out of sand." "We plug the chip into a data center, into power, we light it up, and we put AI on it, and all of a sudden it's thinking." "We've turned sand into thought. And so it's possibly the most revolutionary technology in the history of the species." "It's certainly on par with electricity and steam power. It's certainly more important than the internet." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with Joe Rogan

Marc Andreessen says AI is teaching sand to think and it could be the most important technology in the history of humanity: "Imagine a form of alchemy that turns sand into thought." "Chips are made out of sand. They're made out of silicon, so they're literally made out of sand." "We plug the chip into a data center, into power, we light it up, and we put AI on it, and all of a sudden it's thinking." "We've turned sand into thought. And so it's possibly the most revolutionary technology in the history of the species." "It's certainly on par with electricity and steam power. It's certainly more important than the internet." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with Joe Rogan

a16z

203,805 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 WOW! Vice President JD Vance reveals he initially was not a Christian, but then started to realize — "If the Christians are right about the importance of virtue, and they're right about the importance of being a good father as opposed to how much money you make, and they're right about the importance of being a good husband as opposed to how prestigious your job is, then maybe they're right about these more fundamental questions!" "I start asking, how do I be a good husband? How do I be a good provider? How do I be good at the things that actually matter? And the more that I asked those questions, the more that I felt like Christianity had the best answers. And it's interesting that that really is how it started for me." "I didn't have a conversion on the road to Damascus. But I started to see these sort of rays of sunshine, these evidences of truth in Christian teaching."

🚨 WOW! Vice President JD Vance reveals he initially was not a Christian, but then started to realize — "If the Christians are right about the importance of virtue, and they're right about the importance of being a good father as opposed to how much money you make, and they're right about the importance of being a good husband as opposed to how prestigious your job is, then maybe they're right about these more fundamental questions!" "I start asking, how do I be a good husband? How do I be a good provider? How do I be good at the things that actually matter? And the more that I asked those questions, the more that I felt like Christianity had the best answers. And it's interesting that that really is how it started for me." "I didn't have a conversion on the road to Damascus. But I started to see these sort of rays of sunshine, these evidences of truth in Christian teaching."

Eric Daugherty

409,180 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

THE PLANE THAT FITS IN YOUR GARAGE The ICON A5 is a two-seat, amphibious aircraft that folds its wings and promises to make us all pilots of the future. You can tow it on a trailer like a jet ski, then take off from land or water with just 250 meters of runway. It’s built to fly with a cockpit that feels more Tesla than Boeing. Source: ali969812 on TikTok

THE PLANE THAT FITS IN YOUR GARAGE The ICON A5 is a two-seat, amphibious aircraft that folds its wings and promises to make us all pilots of the future. You can tow it on a trailer like a jet ski, then take off from land or water with just 250 meters of runway. It’s built to fly with a cockpit that feels more Tesla than Boeing. Source: ali969812 on TikTok

Mario Nawfal

81,653 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

.Dylan Patel lays out how we know the hard upper bound on how much compute can be produced annually by 2030: around 200 GW/year. That’s a crazy number (there’s about 20 GW of AI deployed in the world right now), but it’s nowhere near enough to satisfy Sam/Elon/Dario/Demis’s ambitions. Lots of things in the supply chain can be scaled up over 4 years, including things that other people think are bottlenecks, like datacenter power or fab clean room space. But the thing that’s inflexible over that timeline is the number of EUV tools. Dylan forecasts that production of ASML’s EUV tools will scale from 60 per year now to about 100 per year by the end of the decade - which means something like 700 total machines running in 2030. For a fab to make a GW worth of the Rubin chips that NVIDIA is deploying later this year, it needs to make 55,000 3nm wafers, 6,000 5nm wafers, and 170,000 memory wafers. Each 3nm wafers needs about 20 EUV passes, so about 1.1 million passes per GW. Adding on 5nm and memory, you need two million passes. Each tool can do 75 passes per hour, so with 90% uptime that’s around 600k passes per year - so a single machine can make less than a third of a GW in a year. So in 2030, we have 700 total machines, each making 0.3ish GW a year, which means we can produce 200 GW of compute a year. That’s a lot. But Sam Altman wants a gigawatt a week by the end of the decade. Anthropic and Google will be wanting about the same. And Elon wants to be putting 100 GW in space every year. Any one of these players could maybe get what they need, but not all of them.

.Dylan Patel lays out how we know the hard upper bound on how much compute can be produced annually by 2030: around 200 GW/year. That’s a crazy number (there’s about 20 GW of AI deployed in the world right now), but it’s nowhere near enough to satisfy Sam/Elon/Dario/Demis’s ambitions. Lots of things in the supply chain can be scaled up over 4 years, including things that other people think are bottlenecks, like datacenter power or fab clean room space. But the thing that’s inflexible over that timeline is the number of EUV tools. Dylan forecasts that production of ASML’s EUV tools will scale from 60 per year now to about 100 per year by the end of the decade - which means something like 700 total machines running in 2030. For a fab to make a GW worth of the Rubin chips that NVIDIA is deploying later this year, it needs to make 55,000 3nm wafers, 6,000 5nm wafers, and 170,000 memory wafers. Each 3nm wafers needs about 20 EUV passes, so about 1.1 million passes per GW. Adding on 5nm and memory, you need two million passes. Each tool can do 75 passes per hour, so with 90% uptime that’s around 600k passes per year - so a single machine can make less than a third of a GW in a year. So in 2030, we have 700 total machines, each making 0.3ish GW a year, which means we can produce 200 GW of compute a year. That’s a lot. But Sam Altman wants a gigawatt a week by the end of the decade. Anthropic and Google will be wanting about the same. And Elon wants to be putting 100 GW in space every year. Any one of these players could maybe get what they need, but not all of them.

Dwarkesh Patel

114,538 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

When your work has the power to touch a life, to lift someone from despair, or even to save a life, it becomes something far greater than a profession it becomes a purpose. There is no greater reward than knowing that your voice, your actions, or your dedication have brought light into someone’s darkest moment. In a world that can often feel heavy with suffering, the chance to make even a small difference is a priceless privilege. It is this quiet, powerful impact the lives protected, the hope restored, the futures preserved that gives meaning to every long day and every difficult step. And it is this truth that renews my strength each morning, reminding me why I continue this work with unwavering commitment: because when your work helps save lives and inspire hope, it becomes the most valuable work of all. ✨🌍❤️

When your work has the power to touch a life, to lift someone from despair, or even to save a life, it becomes something far greater than a profession it becomes a purpose. There is no greater reward than knowing that your voice, your actions, or your dedication have brought light into someone’s darkest moment. In a world that can often feel heavy with suffering, the chance to make even a small difference is a priceless privilege. It is this quiet, powerful impact the lives protected, the hope restored, the futures preserved that gives meaning to every long day and every difficult step. And it is this truth that renews my strength each morning, reminding me why I continue this work with unwavering commitment: because when your work helps save lives and inspire hope, it becomes the most valuable work of all. ✨🌍❤️

Hariana Veras

27,044 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

"The EF is completely out of touch. They're funding hippos in Asia and doing a bunch of stuff nobody in the world gives a shit about other than Vitalik and his little cabal" Zak on why the EF can no longer take the same liberties it did six years ago "They tried it out with Tomasz and kind of shit the bed. Now they're just like let's go back to what we know, which is infinite gardening and funding longevity research" "At least they're acknowledging that other organizations are gonna have to step in. But then it becomes a question of whether they're actually going to seed those reins to any organization that is more competent and more in touch" "Ethereum is no longer a startup. It's a mature and robust ecosystem. There's billions, trillions of dollars on the line. Livelihoods are dependent on that. My entire career has been on Ethereum. If it goes to shit, what am I gonna do?"

"The EF is completely out of touch. They're funding hippos in Asia and doing a bunch of stuff nobody in the world gives a shit about other than Vitalik and his little cabal" Zak on why the EF can no longer take the same liberties it did six years ago "They tried it out with Tomasz and kind of shit the bed. Now they're just like let's go back to what we know, which is infinite gardening and funding longevity research" "At least they're acknowledging that other organizations are gonna have to step in. But then it becomes a question of whether they're actually going to seed those reins to any organization that is more competent and more in touch" "Ethereum is no longer a startup. It's a mature and robust ecosystem. There's billions, trillions of dollars on the line. Livelihoods are dependent on that. My entire career has been on Ethereum. If it goes to shit, what am I gonna do?"

Laura Shin

58,554 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

SELF LANGUAGE AND HEALTH How we talk about ourselves matters The power of placebo, and its opposite nocebo - means that what we believe, and how we reinforce that with our language can literally make us sick or healthy For this reason, learn to see your symptoms as a healing process, rather than the sickness itself to be avoided Be HAPPY that your body is healing and cleansing you, and your recovery will be improved because of this Once you learn the truth, that you can’t catch a cold; that it’s not a bad thing to clear out garbage (although it may feel rough), then sickness becomes much easier to handle

SELF LANGUAGE AND HEALTH How we talk about ourselves matters The power of placebo, and its opposite nocebo - means that what we believe, and how we reinforce that with our language can literally make us sick or healthy For this reason, learn to see your symptoms as a healing process, rather than the sickness itself to be avoided Be HAPPY that your body is healing and cleansing you, and your recovery will be improved because of this Once you learn the truth, that you can’t catch a cold; that it’s not a bad thing to clear out garbage (although it may feel rough), then sickness becomes much easier to handle

⚡️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬

14,199 просмотров • 1 год назад

"It's much better to work on adding to the economic pie. Create more than you consume." — Elon Musk Strauss Zelnick on what "creating more than you consume" looks like: "You need to know what you want, and then you need to show up on Monday and think about how you're going to create more value than you cost. And then on Friday, think about, did I create more value than I cost?" "Because if you're here for a year, and you get paid $100 plus $25 in benefits, and you generated $10 in value for this enterprise, one of two things will happen. Either you're going to lose your job, or this company will fail." "If you want to succeed, and you want the company to succeed, you got to create more value than what you cost." "Come to work, don't have political exchanges, put a smile on your face, say yes, you're going to be fine."

"It's much better to work on adding to the economic pie. Create more than you consume." — Elon Musk Strauss Zelnick on what "creating more than you consume" looks like: "You need to know what you want, and then you need to show up on Monday and think about how you're going to create more value than you cost. And then on Friday, think about, did I create more value than I cost?" "Because if you're here for a year, and you get paid $100 plus $25 in benefits, and you generated $10 in value for this enterprise, one of two things will happen. Either you're going to lose your job, or this company will fail." "If you want to succeed, and you want the company to succeed, you got to create more value than what you cost." "Come to work, don't have political exchanges, put a smile on your face, say yes, you're going to be fine."

David Senra

12,413 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

She's 22 and a16z just led her $21M round. Her AI is live inside the Fortune 100. "I work every waking second, 7 days a week, and I've never been happier." 17 minutes of an unreal story, from youngest hedge fund quant to funded founder in 2 years. worth more than most of the startup advice on your feed. watch it, then read the article below.

She's 22 and a16z just led her $21M round. Her AI is live inside the Fortune 100. "I work every waking second, 7 days a week, and I've never been happier." 17 minutes of an unreal story, from youngest hedge fund quant to funded founder in 2 years. worth more than most of the startup advice on your feed. watch it, then read the article below.

Anatoli Kopadze

134,827 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 MOM WALKS INTO A SPORTING GOODS STORE AND LOSES HER MIND AFTER SEEING A $500 KIDS BASEBALL BAT — “THIS IS PRICE GOUGING” A mom filming inside a sporting goods store says she thought she was just grabbing a bat for her kid’s season. Then she checked the price tags. One bat on the rack: $500. Right next to it: $450. Then she looks at baseball mitts. One youth glove: $330. “I don’t care what the material is … unless it’s made out of solid gold it ain't worth $300." Next she checks the equipment bags. $450. Parents watching the video say youth sports equipment prices are getting completely out of control. Some say it’s starting to feel less like inflation and more like straight up price gouging targeting families. Between bats, gloves, bags, cleats, and league fees, some parents say a single baseball season can now cost thousands of dollars. Are sports stores price gouging parents… or is this just the new normal?

🚨 MOM WALKS INTO A SPORTING GOODS STORE AND LOSES HER MIND AFTER SEEING A $500 KIDS BASEBALL BAT — “THIS IS PRICE GOUGING” A mom filming inside a sporting goods store says she thought she was just grabbing a bat for her kid’s season. Then she checked the price tags. One bat on the rack: $500. Right next to it: $450. Then she looks at baseball mitts. One youth glove: $330. “I don’t care what the material is … unless it’s made out of solid gold it ain't worth $300." Next she checks the equipment bags. $450. Parents watching the video say youth sports equipment prices are getting completely out of control. Some say it’s starting to feel less like inflation and more like straight up price gouging targeting families. Between bats, gloves, bags, cleats, and league fees, some parents say a single baseball season can now cost thousands of dollars. Are sports stores price gouging parents… or is this just the new normal?

HustleBitch

877,389 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Steve Jobs talking about Pixar and storytelling. Says "no amount of technology will turn a bad story into a good story" and that Pixar's early films had to prioritize a good story because the cost of animating was so high: ◻️ "In a live action movie, the director goes out and shoots a lot of film — typically 10x to 100x more footage than will end up on the screen. Then they take it all into the editing room and that's why sometimes you see a movie and you go 'that stunk, didn't they know?' Well, the answer is 'yes' but they knew it too late in the editing room and...by the time they knew it, the actors were gone and the sets were down and they were out of money.” "In animation, it is so expensive that you can't afford to animate more than a few % more than it's going to end up on screen. You could never afford to animate 10x more. Walt Disney solved the problem decades ago and the way he solved it was to edit films before making them: you get your story team together and you do storyboards." "In Hollywood, one of the most popular sayings is 'story is King' but it turns out it really isn't. Because when push comes to shove...when a movie is in production and there's a lot of mouths to feed — and they're waiting for stuff to make and the story is not working — almost everybody says 'we will just have to make the movie'. And one of the things that I'm proudest of about Pixar is we have a story crisis on every movie...and we stop [everything to] fix the story." ▫️ *** D3 Conference in 2005:

Steve Jobs talking about Pixar and storytelling. Says "no amount of technology will turn a bad story into a good story" and that Pixar's early films had to prioritize a good story because the cost of animating was so high: ◻️ "In a live action movie, the director goes out and shoots a lot of film — typically 10x to 100x more footage than will end up on the screen. Then they take it all into the editing room and that's why sometimes you see a movie and you go 'that stunk, didn't they know?' Well, the answer is 'yes' but they knew it too late in the editing room and...by the time they knew it, the actors were gone and the sets were down and they were out of money.” "In animation, it is so expensive that you can't afford to animate more than a few % more than it's going to end up on screen. You could never afford to animate 10x more. Walt Disney solved the problem decades ago and the way he solved it was to edit films before making them: you get your story team together and you do storyboards." "In Hollywood, one of the most popular sayings is 'story is King' but it turns out it really isn't. Because when push comes to shove...when a movie is in production and there's a lot of mouths to feed — and they're waiting for stuff to make and the story is not working — almost everybody says 'we will just have to make the movie'. And one of the things that I'm proudest of about Pixar is we have a story crisis on every movie...and we stop [everything to] fix the story." ▫️ *** D3 Conference in 2005:

Trung Phan

103,124 просмотров • 1 год назад

Marc Andreessen on the 3 things he looks for when investing in a startup The first thing Marc Andreesen looks for is a big market: “Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and displace incumbents? Or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big?” The second thing he looks for is a 10x better product: “Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that justifies a new company? And the way I always think about that is: Is there a 10x change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10x faster, 10x cheaper, or 10x better? If it’s not 10x, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs have to ask ourselves if it’s really worth doing because it’s really hard to start new companies . . . Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. So for a new company to exist, it has to bring a product to market that’s so much better than what exists that it punches through the status quo.” The third is the team: “Is the team outstanding? . . . You want to have a founding team of complementary skillsets. You want to have at least one super strong technologist — quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist. And then it often helps to have someone who is a marketing or salesperson who has a really good understanding of business.” Marc believes that you need all three of these, but if you’re going to compromise on one of those as an investor, it should be the product: “A great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution. The problem with a poor or small market is that even if you do a good job on the product, there just aren’t that many customers so it’s hard to ever get big and people get demoralized . . . And then we evaluate the team of a startup by its ability to get into a big market with a good product.”

Marc Andreessen on the 3 things he looks for when investing in a startup The first thing Marc Andreesen looks for is a big market: “Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and displace incumbents? Or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big?” The second thing he looks for is a 10x better product: “Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that justifies a new company? And the way I always think about that is: Is there a 10x change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10x faster, 10x cheaper, or 10x better? If it’s not 10x, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs have to ask ourselves if it’s really worth doing because it’s really hard to start new companies . . . Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. So for a new company to exist, it has to bring a product to market that’s so much better than what exists that it punches through the status quo.” The third is the team: “Is the team outstanding? . . . You want to have a founding team of complementary skillsets. You want to have at least one super strong technologist — quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist. And then it often helps to have someone who is a marketing or salesperson who has a really good understanding of business.” Marc believes that you need all three of these, but if you’re going to compromise on one of those as an investor, it should be the product: “A great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution. The problem with a poor or small market is that even if you do a good job on the product, there just aren’t that many customers so it’s hard to ever get big and people get demoralized . . . And then we evaluate the team of a startup by its ability to get into a big market with a good product.”

Startup Archive

17,333 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

💥💥💥 “If we look at #Bitcoin and model it as digital gold, you know the market cap goes to between $10 and $20 trillion, but remember gold is defective property. Gold is dead money. You have a billion dollars of gold that sits in a vault for a decade. It's very hard to mortgage the gold. It's also very hard to rent the gold. You can't loan the gold. No one's going to create a business with your gold, so gold it doesn't generate much of a yield, so for that reason most people wouldn't store a billion dollars for a decade in Gold. They would buy a billion dollars of commercial real estate property and the reason why is because I can rent it and generate a yield on it that's in excess of the maintenance cost. So if you consider digital property, that's a $100 to $200 trillion addressable market, so I would think it goes from $10 trillion to $100 trillion as people start to think of it as is digital property. What does that mean in terms of price per coin? At $500,000 that's a $10 trillion asset, at $5 million that's a $100 trillion dollar asset. So you think it crosses a million, it can go even higher? Yeah. I think it keeps going up forever. I mean there's no reason we couldn't go to $10 million a coin because digital property isn't the highest form right. Gold was that low frequency money. Property is a mid frequency money but when I start to program it faster it starts to look like digital energy and then it doesn't just replace property, then you're starting to replace bonds. It's $100 trillion in bonds, there's $50 to $100 trillion in other currency derivatives and these are all conventional use cases right. I think that there's $350 trillion to $500 trillion worth of currency derivatives in the world and when I say that I mean things that are valued based upon Fiat cash flows. Any commercial real estate, any bond, any sovereign debt, any currency itself, any derivatives to those things, they're all derivatives and they're all defective and they're all defective because of this persistent 7% to 14% lapse in which we call inflation.”- Michael Saylor

💥💥💥 “If we look at #Bitcoin and model it as digital gold, you know the market cap goes to between $10 and $20 trillion, but remember gold is defective property. Gold is dead money. You have a billion dollars of gold that sits in a vault for a decade. It's very hard to mortgage the gold. It's also very hard to rent the gold. You can't loan the gold. No one's going to create a business with your gold, so gold it doesn't generate much of a yield, so for that reason most people wouldn't store a billion dollars for a decade in Gold. They would buy a billion dollars of commercial real estate property and the reason why is because I can rent it and generate a yield on it that's in excess of the maintenance cost. So if you consider digital property, that's a $100 to $200 trillion addressable market, so I would think it goes from $10 trillion to $100 trillion as people start to think of it as is digital property. What does that mean in terms of price per coin? At $500,000 that's a $10 trillion asset, at $5 million that's a $100 trillion dollar asset. So you think it crosses a million, it can go even higher? Yeah. I think it keeps going up forever. I mean there's no reason we couldn't go to $10 million a coin because digital property isn't the highest form right. Gold was that low frequency money. Property is a mid frequency money but when I start to program it faster it starts to look like digital energy and then it doesn't just replace property, then you're starting to replace bonds. It's $100 trillion in bonds, there's $50 to $100 trillion in other currency derivatives and these are all conventional use cases right. I think that there's $350 trillion to $500 trillion worth of currency derivatives in the world and when I say that I mean things that are valued based upon Fiat cash flows. Any commercial real estate, any bond, any sovereign debt, any currency itself, any derivatives to those things, they're all derivatives and they're all defective and they're all defective because of this persistent 7% to 14% lapse in which we call inflation.”- Michael Saylor

Bitcoin News Alerts OG 📢🔥

177,365 просмотров • 2 лет назад

$New startup company will put ‘Mini Data Centers’ on the side of residential homes all over America Companies Nvidia and PulteGroup are patterning with SPAN, “A major U.S home builder is now making small fractional data centers, or they call them nodes that can be put on the side of residential homes.” “These could negate the need to build as many hyperscalers and AI cloud providers Just tap into the node network like a regular data center now SPAN, collaborated with NVIDIA using its technology in the system span claims it can install 8,000 of these units about six times faster and at five times lower cost than the construction of a typical centralized 100 megawatt data center of the same size.” In return for letting this company put a mini data center on the side of your home, you’ll get a $150 credit on your electricity bill In some locations you could get free electricity and internet$

New startup company will put ‘Mini Data Centers’ on the side of residential homes all over America Companies Nvidia and PulteGroup are patterning with SPAN, “A major U.S home builder is now making small fractional data centers, or they call them nodes that can be put on the side of residential homes.” “These could negate the need to build as many hyperscalers and AI cloud providers Just tap into the node network like a regular data center now SPAN, collaborated with NVIDIA using its technology in the system span claims it can install 8,000 of these units about six times faster and at five times lower cost than the construction of a typical centralized 100 megawatt data center of the same size.” In return for letting this company put a mini data center on the side of your home, you’ll get a $150 credit on your electricity bill In some locations you could get free electricity and internet

Wall Street Apes

258,334 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

RE: Data Center purpose. In addition to building a Digital Enslavement Grid—which is obvious—I think the larger thing they're building is a Machine that predicts AND creates the future. Because a machine that can predict the future is also essentially able to create the future simply by adjusting the inputs. They're trying to make a world that's currently indeterminate & uncertain into one that's determinate & certain—through the power of modeling & simulating entire worlds and entities billions of times, and creating a Future-Making All-Seeing-Eye Super Intelligence. Cyber god. If Your Future Machine is better, faster & smarter than The Other Guy's, your future wins. If Your Cyber god is more powerful than The Other Guy's, Your vision wins. Reality becomes what you decide. You can cripple all opposition, and subdue all others beneath you. Think of the world like a giant game of chess. If Your Machine plays better chess than The Other Guy's Machine, it's checkmate for him every time. To use another analogy: think of the classic idea that a butterfly flapping its wings in one part of the world creates a storm in another part of the world. We're talking about the power to know which butterfly, and where, is needed to create said storm, when and where. And the power to defeat The Other Guy's butterfly. Unfortunately, we Americans are all "the other guy" in this scenario (along with virtually every other people in the world). And the power of the future and reality will reside with who controls The Machine, who commands Cyber god. This "Data Center" push is nothing less than building the ability to seize absolute power over the world and shape the future into whatever vision the Tech Oligarchs desire for us, and we won't be able to do anything about it. Checkmate. Right now, they're positioning the pieces. Our window is limited. We're on the clock. Thoughts? What else do you think the implications are for the hyper-massive amount of computing power they're assembling?

RE: Data Center purpose. In addition to building a Digital Enslavement Grid—which is obvious—I think the larger thing they're building is a Machine that predicts AND creates the future. Because a machine that can predict the future is also essentially able to create the future simply by adjusting the inputs. They're trying to make a world that's currently indeterminate & uncertain into one that's determinate & certain—through the power of modeling & simulating entire worlds and entities billions of times, and creating a Future-Making All-Seeing-Eye Super Intelligence. Cyber god. If Your Future Machine is better, faster & smarter than The Other Guy's, your future wins. If Your Cyber god is more powerful than The Other Guy's, Your vision wins. Reality becomes what you decide. You can cripple all opposition, and subdue all others beneath you. Think of the world like a giant game of chess. If Your Machine plays better chess than The Other Guy's Machine, it's checkmate for him every time. To use another analogy: think of the classic idea that a butterfly flapping its wings in one part of the world creates a storm in another part of the world. We're talking about the power to know which butterfly, and where, is needed to create said storm, when and where. And the power to defeat The Other Guy's butterfly. Unfortunately, we Americans are all "the other guy" in this scenario (along with virtually every other people in the world). And the power of the future and reality will reside with who controls The Machine, who commands Cyber god. This "Data Center" push is nothing less than building the ability to seize absolute power over the world and shape the future into whatever vision the Tech Oligarchs desire for us, and we won't be able to do anything about it. Checkmate. Right now, they're positioning the pieces. Our window is limited. We're on the clock. Thoughts? What else do you think the implications are for the hyper-massive amount of computing power they're assembling?

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

41,190 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Steve Jobs talking about Pixar and storytelling. Says "no amount of technology will turn a bad story into a good story" and that Pixar's early films had to prioritize a good story because the cost of animating was so high: ◻️ "In a live action movie, the director goes out and shoots a lot of film — typically 10x to 100x more footage than will end up on the screen. Then they take it all into the editing room and that's why sometimes you see a movie and you go 'that stunk, didn't they know?' Well, the answer is 'yes' but they knew it too late in the editing room and...by the time they knew it, the actors were gone and the sets were down and they were out of money.” "In animation, it is so expensive that you can't afford to animate more than a few % more than it's going to end up on screen. You could never afford to animate 10x more. Walt Disney solved the problem decades ago and the way he solved it was to edit films before making them: you get your story team together and you do storyboards." "In Hollywood, one of the most popular sayings is 'story is King' but it turns out it really isn't. Because when push comes to shove...when a movie is in production and there's a lot of mouths to feed — and they're waiting for stuff to make and the story is not working — almost everybody says 'we will just have to make the movie'. And one of the things that I'm proudest of about Pixar is we have a story crisis on every movie...and we stop [everything to] fix the story." *** D3 Conference in 2005:

Steve Jobs talking about Pixar and storytelling. Says "no amount of technology will turn a bad story into a good story" and that Pixar's early films had to prioritize a good story because the cost of animating was so high: ◻️ "In a live action movie, the director goes out and shoots a lot of film — typically 10x to 100x more footage than will end up on the screen. Then they take it all into the editing room and that's why sometimes you see a movie and you go 'that stunk, didn't they know?' Well, the answer is 'yes' but they knew it too late in the editing room and...by the time they knew it, the actors were gone and the sets were down and they were out of money.” "In animation, it is so expensive that you can't afford to animate more than a few % more than it's going to end up on screen. You could never afford to animate 10x more. Walt Disney solved the problem decades ago and the way he solved it was to edit films before making them: you get your story team together and you do storyboards." "In Hollywood, one of the most popular sayings is 'story is King' but it turns out it really isn't. Because when push comes to shove...when a movie is in production and there's a lot of mouths to feed — and they're waiting for stuff to make and the story is not working — almost everybody says 'we will just have to make the movie'. And one of the things that I'm proudest of about Pixar is we have a story crisis on every movie...and we stop [everything to] fix the story." *** D3 Conference in 2005:

Trung Phan

308,105 просмотров • 1 год назад

Jason Calacanis @jason on compute cost: "Yeah, people are running Kimi on the last generation of hardware, and that's plentiful. I think—and I'll make this prediction here—that you're going to see some of the major customers of Anthropic and major customers of OpenAI (I'm talking about the 8- and 9-figure customers, people spending $50 million, $100 million a year) leaving. They're going to be leaving because they don't trust those companies to not steal the application layer and to compete with them. ElevenLabs, Figma, Lovable—they're all gonna leave, and they're all gonna take Kimi, or they're gonna fork it or DeepSeek. They're all... I know for a fact they're all working on their own models currently. I know from my team; my team has installed Kimi. It is 90% cheaper already. Not sure where you get your data from, but go on OpenRouter. And what OpenRouter does is you pick Kimi stacks, and then you get all the providers there, and then you pick which provider—hold on, let me finish—and you pick them based on their data retention and other issues, and you can dynamically pick the lowest one. That's going to be a massive headwind against these companies. Massive. And I'm seeing it: 9 out of 10 startups I talked to in our portfolio—and found a university when I was just in Japan last week—run the next one, they're all working on open-source, they're all embracing it, and those big companies are embracing it." Via The All-In Podcast

Jason Calacanis @jason on compute cost: "Yeah, people are running Kimi on the last generation of hardware, and that's plentiful. I think—and I'll make this prediction here—that you're going to see some of the major customers of Anthropic and major customers of OpenAI (I'm talking about the 8- and 9-figure customers, people spending $50 million, $100 million a year) leaving. They're going to be leaving because they don't trust those companies to not steal the application layer and to compete with them. ElevenLabs, Figma, Lovable—they're all gonna leave, and they're all gonna take Kimi, or they're gonna fork it or DeepSeek. They're all... I know for a fact they're all working on their own models currently. I know from my team; my team has installed Kimi. It is 90% cheaper already. Not sure where you get your data from, but go on OpenRouter. And what OpenRouter does is you pick Kimi stacks, and then you get all the providers there, and then you pick which provider—hold on, let me finish—and you pick them based on their data retention and other issues, and you can dynamically pick the lowest one. That's going to be a massive headwind against these companies. Massive. And I'm seeing it: 9 out of 10 startups I talked to in our portfolio—and found a university when I was just in Japan last week—run the next one, they're all working on open-source, they're all embracing it, and those big companies are embracing it." Via The All-In Podcast

P Equity Research 📰

35,608 просмотров • 1 день назад

Steve Jobs on storytelling lessons he learned at Pixar. Says "no amount of tech will turn a bad story into a good story" and Pixar's early films (Toy Story, A Bug’s Life, Monsters Inc) had to prioritize a good story because animating so expensive: ◻️ "In a live action movie, the director goes out and shoots a lot of film — typically 10x to 100x more footage than will end up on the screen. Then they take it all into the editing room and that's why sometimes you see a movie and you go 'that stunk, didn't they know?' Well, the answer is 'yes' but they knew it too late in the editing room and...by the time they knew it, the actors were gone and the sets were down and they were out of money.” "In animation, it is so expensive that you can't afford to animate more than a few % more than it's going to end up on screen. You could never afford to animate 10x more. Walt Disney solved the problem decades ago and the way he solved it was to edit films before making them: you get your story team together and you do storyboards." "In Hollywood, one of the most popular sayings is 'story is King' but it turns out it really isn't. Because when push comes to shove...when a movie is in production and there's a lot of mouths to feed — and they're waiting for stuff to make and the story is not working — almost everybody says 'we will just have to make the movie'. And one of the things that I'm proudest of about Pixar is we have a story crisis on every movie...and we stop [everything to] fix the story." ▫️ *** D3 Conference in 2005:

Steve Jobs on storytelling lessons he learned at Pixar. Says "no amount of tech will turn a bad story into a good story" and Pixar's early films (Toy Story, A Bug’s Life, Monsters Inc) had to prioritize a good story because animating so expensive: ◻️ "In a live action movie, the director goes out and shoots a lot of film — typically 10x to 100x more footage than will end up on the screen. Then they take it all into the editing room and that's why sometimes you see a movie and you go 'that stunk, didn't they know?' Well, the answer is 'yes' but they knew it too late in the editing room and...by the time they knew it, the actors were gone and the sets were down and they were out of money.” "In animation, it is so expensive that you can't afford to animate more than a few % more than it's going to end up on screen. You could never afford to animate 10x more. Walt Disney solved the problem decades ago and the way he solved it was to edit films before making them: you get your story team together and you do storyboards." "In Hollywood, one of the most popular sayings is 'story is King' but it turns out it really isn't. Because when push comes to shove...when a movie is in production and there's a lot of mouths to feed — and they're waiting for stuff to make and the story is not working — almost everybody says 'we will just have to make the movie'. And one of the things that I'm proudest of about Pixar is we have a story crisis on every movie...and we stop [everything to] fix the story." ▫️ *** D3 Conference in 2005:

Trung Phan

25,934 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Elon Musk on Starlink today: "Starlink V3 satellite is 10 to 20 times more capable than V2. It's a very big satellite, in fact, it can only be launched on Starship. It's too big to be launched on any other rocket on Earth. Starship has a 30 foot diameter cargo bay and the V3 satellites are about 23 feet wide, so very big, like the size of a small bus, essentially, and they have much bigger phase ray antennas, we've got more KU ground links, we've got more of our laser, our satellites communicate with each other with with lasers that we developed and manufactured, so it's got a lot more lasers and more advanced lasers. It's also got W band and E band. It's like a crazy orbiting radio station. Starship V3 is aimed to do 100 tons to orbit with full reusability and then Starship V4 aiming for over 200 tons per mission, and then being able to launch every hour."

Elon Musk on Starlink today: "Starlink V3 satellite is 10 to 20 times more capable than V2. It's a very big satellite, in fact, it can only be launched on Starship. It's too big to be launched on any other rocket on Earth. Starship has a 30 foot diameter cargo bay and the V3 satellites are about 23 feet wide, so very big, like the size of a small bus, essentially, and they have much bigger phase ray antennas, we've got more KU ground links, we've got more of our laser, our satellites communicate with each other with with lasers that we developed and manufactured, so it's got a lot more lasers and more advanced lasers. It's also got W band and E band. It's like a crazy orbiting radio station. Starship V3 is aimed to do 100 tons to orbit with full reusability and then Starship V4 aiming for over 200 tons per mission, and then being able to launch every hour."

DogeDesigner

34,081 просмотров • 1 месяц назад