Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

SITUATION EXPLAINED: How did Grok catch up this fast? • Grok 4.5 scored 56 on the Artificial Analysis index five weeks ago. Grok 4.6 scores 61, one behind Fable, at the same price • SOTA on knowledge work and legal, beating Fable on GDPval and Sol on Harvey LAB... show more

MTS

411,385 subscribers

34,203 views • 22 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Kimi K3 beating Fable and Sol on price and quality. Command Code's internal flappy bench results are in. Really impressed with the results. For Kimi K3 we set the gameplay to hard while Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol were set to easier. Cost breakdown: • Kimi K3: $0.024 •Fable 5: $0.42 •GPT-5.6 Sol: $0.15 Ranking based on DX & features: •Kimi K3: 8/10 •Fable 5: 7.5/10 • GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 GPT 5.6 Sol max can definitely go on longer and wins the game overall, but that's something different. Grok 4.5 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on that, lol.Mm-hmm.

Kimi K3 beating Fable and Sol on price and quality. Command Code's internal flappy bench results are in. Really impressed with the results. For Kimi K3 we set the gameplay to hard while Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol were set to easier. Cost breakdown: • Kimi K3: $0.024 •Fable 5: $0.42 •GPT-5.6 Sol: $0.15 Ranking based on DX & features: •Kimi K3: 8/10 •Fable 5: 7.5/10 • GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 GPT 5.6 Sol max can definitely go on longer and wins the game overall, but that's something different. Grok 4.5 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on that, lol.Mm-hmm.

Ahmad Awais

255,237 views • 1 month ago

Elon Musk: “We’re making rapid progress on Grok because Grok 4.5 was a huge improvement We have Grok 4.6 coming out probably next week, and then Grok 4.7 is about three or four weeks from today. We expect the cadence of AI development to improve dramatically And then, with Grok 5....which should be out before the end of the year.....we will be incorporating the entire corpus of SpaceX: basically all the data that SpaceX has ever produced That is a tremendous amount over the course of a quarter century, and it will be incorporated into Grok training We think this will make Grok, by far, the best engineer…”

Elon Musk: “We’re making rapid progress on Grok because Grok 4.5 was a huge improvement We have Grok 4.6 coming out probably next week, and then Grok 4.7 is about three or four weeks from today. We expect the cadence of AI development to improve dramatically And then, with Grok 5....which should be out before the end of the year.....we will be incorporating the entire corpus of SpaceX: basically all the data that SpaceX has ever produced That is a tremendous amount over the course of a quarter century, and it will be incorporated into Grok training We think this will make Grok, by far, the best engineer…”

X Freeze

39,005 views • 1 month ago

👀 Gavin Baker on Grok 4.6 Outpacing Anthropic “This is pretty wild … You're well ahead of Fable 5, which I think most people would agree is the gold standard … Very few investors talk about Grok at all and it is Pareto dominant on a lot of measures … Maybe people should start to consider Grok when they think about SpaceX.”

👀 Gavin Baker on Grok 4.6 Outpacing Anthropic “This is pretty wild … You're well ahead of Fable 5, which I think most people would agree is the gold standard … Very few investors talk about Grok at all and it is Pareto dominant on a lot of measures … Maybe people should start to consider Grok when they think about SpaceX.”

Chief Nerd

199,290 views • 19 days ago

ELON MUSK: Grok 5 will train on all SpaceX data, which could make it “by far the best engineer”. “We’re making rapid progress on Grok because Grok 4.5 was a huge improvement. And we have Grok 4.6 coming out probably next week. And then Grok 4.7 is about three or four weeks from today. And we expect the cadence of AI development to improve dramatically. “And then, with Grok 5, which should be out before the end of this year, we will be incorporating the entire corpus of SpaceX data. Basically, all the data that SpaceX has ever produced, which is a tremendous amount over the course of a quarter century, will be incorporated into Grok training. And we think this will make Grok by far the best engineer.”

ELON MUSK: Grok 5 will train on all SpaceX data, which could make it “by far the best engineer”. “We’re making rapid progress on Grok because Grok 4.5 was a huge improvement. And we have Grok 4.6 coming out probably next week. And then Grok 4.7 is about three or four weeks from today. And we expect the cadence of AI development to improve dramatically. “And then, with Grok 5, which should be out before the end of this year, we will be incorporating the entire corpus of SpaceX data. Basically, all the data that SpaceX has ever produced, which is a tremendous amount over the course of a quarter century, will be incorporated into Grok training. And we think this will make Grok by far the best engineer.”

DogeDesigner

190,101 views • 1 month ago

Look how much Grok has progressed in just 6 months from Grok 3 to Grok 4.6! As a quick Saturday morning project I gave Grok Build the link to this previous "𝕏 THE GAME" viral (yet ugly) game Grok was able to watch the video, quickly reverse engineer the game, and make dramatic improvements You can play it here (on desktop): Some lessons I learned: - Grok is extremely token efficient. I was able to iterate on the design many times and still kept the token cost surprisingly low (only a few $ to make this game) - Grok is great at working with humans. Instead of just telling it what to do, or on the other extreme having it go off and do something itself, ask for a list of options on how to improve and tell Grok which ones to implement. A true partnership - Anyone can build things these days with AI, no code knowledge needed What are you building with Grok?

Look how much Grok has progressed in just 6 months from Grok 3 to Grok 4.6! As a quick Saturday morning project I gave Grok Build the link to this previous "𝕏 THE GAME" viral (yet ugly) game Grok was able to watch the video, quickly reverse engineer the game, and make dramatic improvements You can play it here (on desktop): Some lessons I learned: - Grok is extremely token efficient. I was able to iterate on the design many times and still kept the token cost surprisingly low (only a few $ to make this game) - Grok is great at working with humans. Instead of just telling it what to do, or on the other extreme having it go off and do something itself, ask for a list of options on how to improve and tell Grok which ones to implement. A true partnership - Anyone can build things these days with AI, no code knowledge needed What are you building with Grok?

Dan

6,118,254 views • 19 days ago

I said Grok 4.5 was a bigger deal than Fable Elon even liked my post but then GPT-5.6 Sol showed up So I gave 7 of this week's newest AI models their own computer and ran the same real tasks through Hermes Final ranking: 1. GPT-5.6 Sol: best overall 2. Grok 4.5: close second, fast and relentless 3. Muse Spark 1.1: the surprise of the week Benchmarks tell you what a model might do. Watching it control a computer shows you what it can actually do Full comparison ↓

I said Grok 4.5 was a bigger deal than Fable Elon even liked my post but then GPT-5.6 Sol showed up So I gave 7 of this week's newest AI models their own computer and ran the same real tasks through Hermes Final ranking: 1. GPT-5.6 Sol: best overall 2. Grok 4.5: close second, fast and relentless 3. Muse Spark 1.1: the surprise of the week Benchmarks tell you what a model might do. Watching it control a computer shows you what it can actually do Full comparison ↓

Nick Vasilescu

77,701 views • 1 month ago

Grok 4.5 is out!!! here is what you need to know : On cursor bench it matched fable 5 high at 83% cheaper, although the ui generation feels similar to gpt 5.5 in a bad way. Important to note, cursor bench was LEAKED to grok 4.5 and may have skewed the results! My initial thoughts are this could be a insanely cheap opus 4.8 level model that runs insanely fast. Will you be using grok build?

Grok 4.5 is out!!! here is what you need to know : On cursor bench it matched fable 5 high at 83% cheaper, although the ui generation feels similar to gpt 5.5 in a bad way. Important to note, cursor bench was LEAKED to grok 4.5 and may have skewed the results! My initial thoughts are this could be a insanely cheap opus 4.8 level model that runs insanely fast. Will you be using grok build?

Max Blade

19,431 views • 1 month ago

$SpaceXAI pulled off a miracle 6 months ago Grok wasn't close to the frontier. Now it's just as good as Opus 5 for a fraction of the price It beat all other models in my tests and did it for dirt cheap In this video I cover why it's so good and how to get the most out of it:$

SpaceXAI pulled off a miracle 6 months ago Grok wasn't close to the frontier. Now it's just as good as Opus 5 for a fraction of the price It beat all other models in my tests and did it for dirt cheap In this video I cover why it's so good and how to get the most out of it:

Alex Finn

60,542 views • 21 days ago

$SITUATION EXPLAINED: Kimi K3 just beat Fable on a major coding benchmark, at a fraction of the price. • Kimi K3 beat Fable on Frontend Code Arena • The gap between Kimi and Fable is bigger than the gap between Fable and Sol • It also smashes Opus outright, while being priced the same as Sonnet, $3/$15 per million tokens • Sonnet 5 High currently sits in 10th place on this leaderboard at that same price point • The generational jump is dramatic: Kimi K2.6 ranked 18th on this benchmark, K3 jumped 17 spots to take the top spot • K3 ranked #1 in 6 of 7 tested domains: brand and marketing, reference-based design, data and analytics, consumer products, simulations, and content creation tools, it placed #2, only in gaming, behind Fable • Full model weights are set to release July 27th Theo Jaffee: "Imagine if Anthropic were a public company today, their stock would be down 20%, maybe more, enterprises are probably not gonna be spending $10 and $50 on Fable when they can instead be spending $3 and $15 on Kimi K3."$

SITUATION EXPLAINED: Kimi K3 just beat Fable on a major coding benchmark, at a fraction of the price. • Kimi K3 beat Fable on Frontend Code Arena • The gap between Kimi and Fable is bigger than the gap between Fable and Sol • It also smashes Opus outright, while being priced the same as Sonnet, $3/$15 per million tokens • Sonnet 5 High currently sits in 10th place on this leaderboard at that same price point • The generational jump is dramatic: Kimi K2.6 ranked 18th on this benchmark, K3 jumped 17 spots to take the top spot • K3 ranked #1 in 6 of 7 tested domains: brand and marketing, reference-based design, data and analytics, consumer products, simulations, and content creation tools, it placed #2, only in gaming, behind Fable • Full model weights are set to release July 27th Theo Jaffee: "Imagine if Anthropic were a public company today, their stock would be down 20%, maybe more, enterprises are probably not gonna be spending $10 and $50 on Fable when they can instead be spending $3 and $15 on Kimi K3."

MTS

132,705 views • 1 month ago

Took Grok 4.6 out for a spin this weekend and built this horde shooter prototype on ThreeJS. It is a big step up from Grok 4.5! I've always wanted to try building a horde shooter game with thousands of enemies onscreen and used Grok 4.6 for pretty much everything (including UI, vfx, and even the sfx!), except the 3D models for the characters, which were made and rigged with Meshy. I'm also amazed that ThreeJS with WebGPU can really handle thousands of enemies onscreen at the same time, though I think I pushed the limit here with Depth of Field and some other fancy shaders. Very fun!

Took Grok 4.6 out for a spin this weekend and built this horde shooter prototype on ThreeJS. It is a big step up from Grok 4.5! I've always wanted to try building a horde shooter game with thousands of enemies onscreen and used Grok 4.6 for pretty much everything (including UI, vfx, and even the sfx!), except the 3D models for the characters, which were made and rigged with Meshy. I'm also amazed that ThreeJS with WebGPU can really handle thousands of enemies onscreen at the same time, though I think I pushed the limit here with Depth of Field and some other fancy shaders. Very fun!

Danny Limanseta

63,198 views • 18 days ago

The truth about 5.6 sol after using it all day : The hype is overblown. Sort of. The benchmarks, and the commentary on X convinced me we were receiving AGI that runs at hyper speed, and is insanely cheap. in reality, 5.6 is built on the same spud pretraining as 5.5 this means its a nice bump, but not the opus to fable 5 LEAP in intelligence we recently experienced from anthropic. 5.6 is 2x times cheaper than fable on paper, and actually 3x cheaper when you look at actual task execution because of its token efficiency. BUT on swe bench where the models have to fix actual github bugs it falls behind fable pretty big. For vibecoders like myself this means I will be using 5.6 sol as a worker agent for Fable 5 to orchestrate alongside grok 4.5 I love this new era.

The truth about 5.6 sol after using it all day : The hype is overblown. Sort of. The benchmarks, and the commentary on X convinced me we were receiving AGI that runs at hyper speed, and is insanely cheap. in reality, 5.6 is built on the same spud pretraining as 5.5 this means its a nice bump, but not the opus to fable 5 LEAP in intelligence we recently experienced from anthropic. 5.6 is 2x times cheaper than fable on paper, and actually 3x cheaper when you look at actual task execution because of its token efficiency. BUT on swe bench where the models have to fix actual github bugs it falls behind fable pretty big. For vibecoders like myself this means I will be using 5.6 sol as a worker agent for Fable 5 to orchestrate alongside grok 4.5 I love this new era.

Max Blade

36,873 views • 1 month ago

The ultimate Grok Bot usage hack! HEAVY lift cloud agents skill. The problem statement was I had been consuming all my grok bot weekly usage & zippo of my monthly cursor ultra tokens. Well now that’s all changed! I created a skill with my chief of staff that is to use Cursor cloud agents for any heavy lifting (they have vm/web surfing too!) where my grok bots only act as management (not real work but still useful) Results are real, task that took 5% bot usage are now redistributed on my cursor monthly allotment and grok bot is now consuming sub 1% weekly usage for the same if not higher throughput, because I instructed the skill to long running grok 4.6 agents sized for the task at hand.

The ultimate Grok Bot usage hack! HEAVY lift cloud agents skill. The problem statement was I had been consuming all my grok bot weekly usage & zippo of my monthly cursor ultra tokens. Well now that’s all changed! I created a skill with my chief of staff that is to use Cursor cloud agents for any heavy lifting (they have vm/web surfing too!) where my grok bots only act as management (not real work but still useful) Results are real, task that took 5% bot usage are now redistributed on my cursor monthly allotment and grok bot is now consuming sub 1% weekly usage for the same if not higher throughput, because I instructed the skill to long running grok 4.6 agents sized for the task at hand.

Try TLGen App | Brandon Starship 🇺🇸

44,375 views • 12 days ago

ex-Apple engineer gave Grok 4.6 - 30 minutes to redesign a live app, then showed the GrokBot run that merged its own PRs: "GrokBot runs 20-30 agents in parallel while Hermes and OpenClaw run one. Same weights, 20x the throughput - and the agents keep improving from their own runs." Grok 4.6 runs 5x cheaper on input and 8x on output - $2 and $6 per million. his verdict: this is an easy Opus replacement worth more than any $500 course on agentic engineering watch today, then read the article below on building a self-running agent stack

ex-Apple engineer gave Grok 4.6 - 30 minutes to redesign a live app, then showed the GrokBot run that merged its own PRs: "GrokBot runs 20-30 agents in parallel while Hermes and OpenClaw run one. Same weights, 20x the throughput - and the agents keep improving from their own runs." Grok 4.6 runs 5x cheaper on input and 8x on output - $2 and $6 per million. his verdict: this is an easy Opus replacement worth more than any $500 course on agentic engineering watch today, then read the article below on building a self-running agent stack

Carnage

82,071 views • 10 days ago

NVIDIA CEO: GROK 5 IS A 7 TRILLION PARAMETER RACE AGAINST TIME Jensen Huang is dialing in on the real challenge: not making bigger models, but training them fast without draining power or budgets. Grok 5 is right in the middle of that race. “The next frontier model. Elon already mentioned that the next version of Grok, Grok 5 I believe, is 7 trillion parameters. This one is 10, and the green represents Blackwell. In the case of Rubin, notice that the throughput is much higher, so it only takes one fourth as many of these systems to train the model within the one-month timeframe we have given here.” Source: Rohan Paul

NVIDIA CEO: GROK 5 IS A 7 TRILLION PARAMETER RACE AGAINST TIME Jensen Huang is dialing in on the real challenge: not making bigger models, but training them fast without draining power or budgets. Grok 5 is right in the middle of that race. “The next frontier model. Elon already mentioned that the next version of Grok, Grok 5 I believe, is 7 trillion parameters. This one is 10, and the green represents Blackwell. In the case of Rubin, notice that the throughput is much higher, so it only takes one fourth as many of these systems to train the model within the one-month timeframe we have given here.” Source: Rohan Paul

Mario Nawfal

76,356 views • 7 months ago

Fable 5.1 charges 6× more than GPT-5.6 Sol anthropic's Fable 5.1 went live. we threw it straight at openai's GPT-5.6 Sol. same prompts, one shot. the test: five self-contained three.js scenes, one continuous project — a futuristic mansion on a private island. exterior orbit, grand hall with a diamond chandelier, pool with a water park, garage with 10 lambos, helicopter landing on the roof cost: Claude Fable 5.1 — $5.69 GPT-5.6 Sol — $0.88 what we saw: • fable goes for realism — waves, depth, a sand ring around the island. sol goes low-poly and clean, and its style never breaks across all 5 scenes • fable's chandelier is thousands of individual crystals. sol's hall is honestly just a staircase and a wall • fable's helicopter touches down on the lit helipad much smoother than sol's • fable built a triple-slide water-park tower — and shipped the pool with no water. sol's park is tiny — but the pool is full 6× the price buys you 6× the detail — and the same one-shot bugs. what's your choice? try Fable 5.1 on aimlapi[.]com

Fable 5.1 charges 6× more than GPT-5.6 Sol anthropic's Fable 5.1 went live. we threw it straight at openai's GPT-5.6 Sol. same prompts, one shot. the test: five self-contained three.js scenes, one continuous project — a futuristic mansion on a private island. exterior orbit, grand hall with a diamond chandelier, pool with a water park, garage with 10 lambos, helicopter landing on the roof cost: Claude Fable 5.1 — $5.69 GPT-5.6 Sol — $0.88 what we saw: • fable goes for realism — waves, depth, a sand ring around the island. sol goes low-poly and clean, and its style never breaks across all 5 scenes • fable's chandelier is thousands of individual crystals. sol's hall is honestly just a staircase and a wall • fable's helicopter touches down on the lit helipad much smoother than sol's • fable built a triple-slide water-park tower — and shipped the pool with no water. sol's park is tiny — but the pool is full 6× the price buys you 6× the detail — and the same one-shot bugs. what's your choice? try Fable 5.1 on aimlapi[.]com

AI/ML API

334,383 views • 2 days ago

I BUILT "GROK BATTLE" AND MADE GROK, GPT AND CLAUDE TRADE THE SAME ROBINHOOD STREAM WITH REAL MONEY TO SEE WHO MAKES MORE $500 each. same stocks. same account. same 24 hours. the only difference is the brain inside each pipeline grok made $4,800. claude made $1,640. gpt made $380. same stream, same entries available, three completely different results the part that broke my brain: all three saw the same SMCI earnings setup at 09:31. grok entered at open with a full bracket. claude waited fourteen minutes for volume confirmation. gpt wrote a two page analysis and entered after the gap was already priced in. grok rode it to the target. 8.4x on options that one decision is the entire gap between $4,800 and $380 here is what each model actually does differently > grok: fastest to decide. sentiment scoring is wild, it catches momentum before the first candle closes. but it overbuys. 23 entries in 24 hours, 14 of them stopped out. the winners are so big they cover everything > claude: most conservative. only 7 entries. five of them hit target. its checker is brutal, killed thirty one setups that grok took. but it also killed four that would have printed. safe money, slow money > gpt: smartest analysis, worst timing. writes the best reports on why a stock will move. by the time it finishes thinking the move is over and the entry is dead. 9 entries, 4 wins, but every win was small because it entered late the scoring breakdown > sentiment speed: grok 0.92, claude 0.71, gpt 0.84 > checker kill rate: claude 94%, grok 78%, gpt 86% > average entry delay from signal: grok 4 sec, claude 14 min, gpt 22 min > average hold time: grok 4.2 min, claude 11.8 min, gpt 22.6 min the model that thinks the best trades the worst. the model that decides the fastest makes the most. the model that says no the most loses the least that is the line i keep rereading every prompt, every scoring matrix, all three configs side by side. fork whichever brain fits your risk CA - 0x89C83B0b4CAC90a698EB98917852A7fA45F1E25D link below

I BUILT "GROK BATTLE" AND MADE GROK, GPT AND CLAUDE TRADE THE SAME ROBINHOOD STREAM WITH REAL MONEY TO SEE WHO MAKES MORE $500 each. same stocks. same account. same 24 hours. the only difference is the brain inside each pipeline grok made $4,800. claude made $1,640. gpt made $380. same stream, same entries available, three completely different results the part that broke my brain: all three saw the same SMCI earnings setup at 09:31. grok entered at open with a full bracket. claude waited fourteen minutes for volume confirmation. gpt wrote a two page analysis and entered after the gap was already priced in. grok rode it to the target. 8.4x on options that one decision is the entire gap between $4,800 and $380 here is what each model actually does differently > grok: fastest to decide. sentiment scoring is wild, it catches momentum before the first candle closes. but it overbuys. 23 entries in 24 hours, 14 of them stopped out. the winners are so big they cover everything > claude: most conservative. only 7 entries. five of them hit target. its checker is brutal, killed thirty one setups that grok took. but it also killed four that would have printed. safe money, slow money > gpt: smartest analysis, worst timing. writes the best reports on why a stock will move. by the time it finishes thinking the move is over and the entry is dead. 9 entries, 4 wins, but every win was small because it entered late the scoring breakdown > sentiment speed: grok 0.92, claude 0.71, gpt 0.84 > checker kill rate: claude 94%, grok 78%, gpt 86% > average entry delay from signal: grok 4 sec, claude 14 min, gpt 22 min > average hold time: grok 4.2 min, claude 11.8 min, gpt 22.6 min the model that thinks the best trades the worst. the model that decides the fastest makes the most. the model that says no the most loses the least that is the line i keep rereading every prompt, every scoring matrix, all three configs side by side. fork whichever brain fits your risk CA - 0x89C83B0b4CAC90a698EB98917852A7fA45F1E25D link below

zostaff

12,748 views • 3 days ago

Grok 4.20 is INSANE bro. Have a vague memory about something someone kind of said? Ask Grok to find it. Grok can read video transcripts on YouTube. Check this out - Grok found the exact video in under a minute. My prompt: "Hi Grok, Rabbitohs made a documentary or posted some other video.. where they said that Dave Taylor was warned NOT to kick to himself (kick and chase, grubber etc) yet he did it and it resulted in an incredible try. Can you find the source where someone disclosed the Rabbitohs management or coach etc had told Dave he was NOT to kick for himself?" • Grok finds the exact video I had seen 4 years ago, despite me not giving a verbatim quote and not remember the details exactly • Grok also links to a higher quality replay of the actual play (Dave Taylor kicking to himself) I've spliced them both together on this post. Grok really is INSANE bro. If you're not using Grok, you are messing up.

Grok 4.20 is INSANE bro. Have a vague memory about something someone kind of said? Ask Grok to find it. Grok can read video transcripts on YouTube. Check this out - Grok found the exact video in under a minute. My prompt: "Hi Grok, Rabbitohs made a documentary or posted some other video.. where they said that Dave Taylor was warned NOT to kick to himself (kick and chase, grubber etc) yet he did it and it resulted in an incredible try. Can you find the source where someone disclosed the Rabbitohs management or coach etc had told Dave he was NOT to kick for himself?" • Grok finds the exact video I had seen 4 years ago, despite me not giving a verbatim quote and not remember the details exactly • Grok also links to a higher quality replay of the actual play (Dave Taylor kicking to himself) I've spliced them both together on this post. Grok really is INSANE bro. If you're not using Grok, you are messing up.

stevenmarkryan

14,236 views • 5 months ago

How Grok saved this cat’s life ❤️ • A photographer @Lars_Maier_de in Frankfurt noticed his 9-year-old cat suddenly stop eating late at night • The cat hid under the couch, had a strange sweet/rotten breath, then suddenly collapsed unconscious • Panicked and unsure what was happening, he opened Grok and typed the symptoms • Grok responded instantly, warning it could be a serious diabetic emergency (ketoacidosis) • Grok told him clearly: don’t wait, go to a vet immediately • He rushed to a 24-hour clinic with the cat unconscious beside him • Kept checking Grok on the way, which explained the condition and how critical every minute was • This helped him stay calm enough to drive fast but safely • At the clinic, vets confirmed it was a full diabetic crisis • They said if he had arrived even 30 minutes later, the cat likely wouldn’t have survived • Because of the early warning and urgency, he made it just in time Now the cat is back home, and recovering.

How Grok saved this cat’s life ❤️ • A photographer @Lars_Maier_de in Frankfurt noticed his 9-year-old cat suddenly stop eating late at night • The cat hid under the couch, had a strange sweet/rotten breath, then suddenly collapsed unconscious • Panicked and unsure what was happening, he opened Grok and typed the symptoms • Grok responded instantly, warning it could be a serious diabetic emergency (ketoacidosis) • Grok told him clearly: don’t wait, go to a vet immediately • He rushed to a 24-hour clinic with the cat unconscious beside him • Kept checking Grok on the way, which explained the condition and how critical every minute was • This helped him stay calm enough to drive fast but safely • At the clinic, vets confirmed it was a full diabetic crisis • They said if he had arrived even 30 minutes later, the cat likely wouldn’t have survived • Because of the early warning and urgency, he made it just in time Now the cat is back home, and recovering.

DogeDesigner

60,674 views • 4 months ago

ex-Apple engineer gave Grok 4.6 two jobs inside Cursor, went to sleep, and opened the results live the next morning: no babysitting, no checking every generation, just a model left running on real work for hours. • 00:42 - reveal the website Grok redesigned overnight • 23:21 - go from a voice prompt to a full software stack • 45:43 - inspect the generated code + architecture • 01:21:26 - Grok 4.6 vs Opus 5 • 01:46:31 - live PR + Cloud Agent workflow Most coding demos test an AI for 5 minutes. This tests the thing that matters for agents: can the model keep working when you stop watching it? SpaceXAI built Grok 4.6 specifically around longer-running agent tasks, coding and more ambitious visual work. The endgame isn’t prompting faster. It’s giving an agent a job at night and reviewing finished work in the morning. Worth watching before you choose which model runs your overnight agent loops.

ex-Apple engineer gave Grok 4.6 two jobs inside Cursor, went to sleep, and opened the results live the next morning: no babysitting, no checking every generation, just a model left running on real work for hours. • 00:42 - reveal the website Grok redesigned overnight • 23:21 - go from a voice prompt to a full software stack • 45:43 - inspect the generated code + architecture • 01:21:26 - Grok 4.6 vs Opus 5 • 01:46:31 - live PR + Cloud Agent workflow Most coding demos test an AI for 5 minutes. This tests the thing that matters for agents: can the model keep working when you stop watching it? SpaceXAI built Grok 4.6 specifically around longer-running agent tasks, coding and more ambitious visual work. The endgame isn’t prompting faster. It’s giving an agent a job at night and reviewing finished work in the morning. Worth watching before you choose which model runs your overnight agent loops.

Morlex

5,232,303 views • 11 days ago