Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Slavery was not legally permitted during apartheid. It had already been abolished in South Africa in 1834 when the British ended the practice across their empire. That was over 100 years before the apartheid government came into power in 1948. However, even though slavery was no longer on the... show more

𝔹𝕝𝕖𝕤𝕤𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕋𝕤𝕙𝕖𝕘𝕠 𝕆𝕣𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕝𝕨𝕖

8,440 subscribers

32,263 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Образование Здоровье и велнес

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

I just saw that Mr George Galloway quoted my tweet, and it reminds me of when, as a political science undergrad at Nigeria’s premier university, I was researching the brutality of the apartheid regime in South Africa and came across his debate at the Oxford Union for the first time. In the debate, Mr Galloway spoke of a time he joined in the fight against apartheid in South Africa and asserted that he would never debate a supporter of apartheid because it is one of the worst forms of racism and fascism there are. It is a delight to see that he has remained steadfast in speaking out against apartheid, racism, and genocide, and that he has been consistent in upholding democracy, respect for international law, and the sovereignty of nations, especially those vulnerable to the whims of imperial predators. Attached is a video clip of his debate at the Oxford Union. Video credit: Oxford Union George Galloway

I just saw that Mr George Galloway quoted my tweet, and it reminds me of when, as a political science undergrad at Nigeria’s premier university, I was researching the brutality of the apartheid regime in South Africa and came across his debate at the Oxford Union for the first time. In the debate, Mr Galloway spoke of a time he joined in the fight against apartheid in South Africa and asserted that he would never debate a supporter of apartheid because it is one of the worst forms of racism and fascism there are. It is a delight to see that he has remained steadfast in speaking out against apartheid, racism, and genocide, and that he has been consistent in upholding democracy, respect for international law, and the sovereignty of nations, especially those vulnerable to the whims of imperial predators. Attached is a video clip of his debate at the Oxford Union. Video credit: Oxford Union George Galloway

Ayo-Elesho

139,717 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Fadiel Adams, President of the National Coloured Congress, argues that South Africans often focus only on apartheid when discussing the country’s history of injustice, even though apartheid lasted less than 50 years compared to the roughly 300 years of colonial rule that came before it. He said this narrow focus overlooks the deeper impact of colonialism, including land dispossession and the loss of language, culture, and identity experienced by earlier generations, adding that understanding this longer history is essential to fully recognise the roots of inequality in South Africa today.

Fadiel Adams, President of the National Coloured Congress, argues that South Africans often focus only on apartheid when discussing the country’s history of injustice, even though apartheid lasted less than 50 years compared to the roughly 300 years of colonial rule that came before it. He said this narrow focus overlooks the deeper impact of colonialism, including land dispossession and the loss of language, culture, and identity experienced by earlier generations, adding that understanding this longer history is essential to fully recognise the roots of inequality in South Africa today.

MDN NEWS

73,794 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

ORANIA: THE WHITES-ONLY TOWN IN SOUTH AFRICA In 2024, South Africans were among the more than 3-billion people who went to the polls in more than 60 countries in national elections. For South Africa, the elections had historical significance - they came at a time when the country was marking three decades since the end of apartheid. When apartheid ended in 1994, many Black South Africans had high expectations about what the future held for them after centuries of social and economic exclusion. Decades later, the African National Congress (ANC), which has governed the country since 1994, is facing accusations of not doing enough to dismantle apartheid-era socio-economic structures and injustices. Nothing exemplifies this better than the existence of Orania, a Whites-only town in the country's Northern Cape province. The town has been a source of tension since its establishment in the early '90s during the last days of apartheid. The town's founders and residents claim its purpose is to preserve the culture and identity of the Afrikaner people, White South Africans of mostly Dutch, French and German descent. However, many people think the town and its policy of not allowing non-White residents is nothing but a racist endeavour to maintain some vestiges of the apartheid system. The town's residents insist that its existence is protected by Article 235 of the South African constitution, which guarantees self-determination. However, many have argued that the cited part of the constitution does not, in fact, permit people of a particular religious or cultural group to live in a secluded place away from other South Africans. In 2000, the Northern Cape High Court adjourned 'sine die' (without a further hearing date) after Orania's proponents challenged attempts by the government to incorporate the town into the nearby municipal authority. African Stream was shown around Orania by some of the locals, who shared their opinions about their community with us. We'd love to hear yours as well in the replies.

ORANIA: THE WHITES-ONLY TOWN IN SOUTH AFRICA In 2024, South Africans were among the more than 3-billion people who went to the polls in more than 60 countries in national elections. For South Africa, the elections had historical significance - they came at a time when the country was marking three decades since the end of apartheid. When apartheid ended in 1994, many Black South Africans had high expectations about what the future held for them after centuries of social and economic exclusion. Decades later, the African National Congress (ANC), which has governed the country since 1994, is facing accusations of not doing enough to dismantle apartheid-era socio-economic structures and injustices. Nothing exemplifies this better than the existence of Orania, a Whites-only town in the country's Northern Cape province. The town has been a source of tension since its establishment in the early '90s during the last days of apartheid. The town's founders and residents claim its purpose is to preserve the culture and identity of the Afrikaner people, White South Africans of mostly Dutch, French and German descent. However, many people think the town and its policy of not allowing non-White residents is nothing but a racist endeavour to maintain some vestiges of the apartheid system. The town's residents insist that its existence is protected by Article 235 of the South African constitution, which guarantees self-determination. However, many have argued that the cited part of the constitution does not, in fact, permit people of a particular religious or cultural group to live in a secluded place away from other South Africans. In 2000, the Northern Cape High Court adjourned 'sine die' (without a further hearing date) after Orania's proponents challenged attempts by the government to incorporate the town into the nearby municipal authority. African Stream was shown around Orania by some of the locals, who shared their opinions about their community with us. We'd love to hear yours as well in the replies.

African Stream

12,019 просмотров • 1 год назад

Nikki Haley defended not citing slavery as the cause of the Civil War during a campaign event in New Hampshire, saying that this was "a given" for people who grew up in the South: "To me, it was about freedom. It's bigger than slavery."

Nikki Haley defended not citing slavery as the cause of the Civil War during a campaign event in New Hampshire, saying that this was "a given" for people who grew up in the South: "To me, it was about freedom. It's bigger than slavery."

CBS News

3,998,610 просмотров • 2 лет назад

FRONTLINE STATES… SADCC was formed to isolate Apartheid South Africa… However, South Africa FOUGHT BACK… Landlocked Zimbabwe needed access to the sea & SA provided 75% of that at independence. Zimbabwe upgraded the Beira Corridor, but SA military SABOTAGED it many times… In the end, Zimbabwe had to put boots on the ground to confront Apartheid SA’s military operatives in Mozambique… Zimbabwe & Mozambique had to implement economic sanctions against South Africa even though it brought massive economic problems to their own countries… It was an interesting time

FRONTLINE STATES… SADCC was formed to isolate Apartheid South Africa… However, South Africa FOUGHT BACK… Landlocked Zimbabwe needed access to the sea & SA provided 75% of that at independence. Zimbabwe upgraded the Beira Corridor, but SA military SABOTAGED it many times… In the end, Zimbabwe had to put boots on the ground to confront Apartheid SA’s military operatives in Mozambique… Zimbabwe & Mozambique had to implement economic sanctions against South Africa even though it brought massive economic problems to their own countries… It was an interesting time

𝑲𝒖𝒅𝒛𝒂𝒊 𝑴𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒔𝒊

19,304 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Apartheid is not over, there is an ongoing black people genocide in South Africa🇿🇦💔. In recent times, whites have been putting black people in caskets as seen on the video and allegedly burying them alive, they have murdered black women and fed them to pigs to eat, they run over black children with their cars breaking their legs, there has also been reports of white farmers forcing their black workers to murder their spouses for insurance financial benefits and then get the black people arrested and denying having hired them for the murder cases, painting them as criminals partaking in a none existing white genocide. L White people in South Africa have been seen physically attacking black people in public areas with swimming pools for being black, saying they are not allowed in their areas just like they did during apartheid before 1994. The whites that worship apartheid idols have moved to create their own little town called Orania, where black people are not allowed to live, just like during apartheid, they have statues of their apartheid idols in Orania and they are using their own flag trying to separate themselves from South Africa while geographically still in South Africa. All these are things the media don't want to talk about because the media is controlled by the same white people supporting white supremacy, racism and segregation. Don't be surprised if my account gets shadow banned or suspended after this tweet. This platform is owned by one of the biggest fans of apartheid. Please RT(Retweet) and spread the message.

Apartheid is not over, there is an ongoing black people genocide in South Africa🇿🇦💔. In recent times, whites have been putting black people in caskets as seen on the video and allegedly burying them alive, they have murdered black women and fed them to pigs to eat, they run over black children with their cars breaking their legs, there has also been reports of white farmers forcing their black workers to murder their spouses for insurance financial benefits and then get the black people arrested and denying having hired them for the murder cases, painting them as criminals partaking in a none existing white genocide. L White people in South Africa have been seen physically attacking black people in public areas with swimming pools for being black, saying they are not allowed in their areas just like they did during apartheid before 1994. The whites that worship apartheid idols have moved to create their own little town called Orania, where black people are not allowed to live, just like during apartheid, they have statues of their apartheid idols in Orania and they are using their own flag trying to separate themselves from South Africa while geographically still in South Africa. All these are things the media don't want to talk about because the media is controlled by the same white people supporting white supremacy, racism and segregation. Don't be surprised if my account gets shadow banned or suspended after this tweet. This platform is owned by one of the biggest fans of apartheid. Please RT(Retweet) and spread the message.

Abahambe!!!🇿🇦

32,979 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Slavery had been the norm throughout all of history, for thousands of years, impacting all people, including millions of Europeans enslaved in the Ottoman Empire - which had institutionalized the sexual slavery of European women. Yet children are led to believe that slavery was a uniquely American activity. Now why do you think that is?

Slavery had been the norm throughout all of history, for thousands of years, impacting all people, including millions of Europeans enslaved in the Ottoman Empire - which had institutionalized the sexual slavery of European women. Yet children are led to believe that slavery was a uniquely American activity. Now why do you think that is?

Brett Pike

12,241,196 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

𝗗𝗜𝗗 𝗠𝗨𝗚𝗔𝗕𝗘 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗛𝗘𝗟𝗣 𝗦𝗢𝗨𝗧𝗛 𝗔𝗙𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗡𝗦 𝗙𝗜𝗚𝗛𝗧𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗔𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗜𝗗? For many years, South Africans have quoted Mugabe’s speech—where he said he would assist South Africa diplomatically and not militarily—to justify the perception that Zimbabwe did not help South Africa in its fight for independence. But this ignores key facts. Mugabe was already at war with the apartheid government in Mozambique and in Matebeleland when be made this speech. Additionally, its is also illogical to expect Mugabe to openly reveal military plans to his enemies—the apartheid regime and their Western allies—in the media, especially knowing that the ANC and its leaders were labelled terrorists by the U.S., U.K., and the broader Western world. Therefore, Mugabe could not publicly admit to assisting “terrorists” in armed operations against a sovereign state, as it would have been considered a breach of international law. This was despite the reality that he was already fighting two wars agaist the apartheid government in Matebeleland and Mozambique, after the apartheid government attacked Zimbabwe.

𝗗𝗜𝗗 𝗠𝗨𝗚𝗔𝗕𝗘 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗛𝗘𝗟𝗣 𝗦𝗢𝗨𝗧𝗛 𝗔𝗙𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗡𝗦 𝗙𝗜𝗚𝗛𝗧𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗔𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗜𝗗? For many years, South Africans have quoted Mugabe’s speech—where he said he would assist South Africa diplomatically and not militarily—to justify the perception that Zimbabwe did not help South Africa in its fight for independence. But this ignores key facts. Mugabe was already at war with the apartheid government in Mozambique and in Matebeleland when be made this speech. Additionally, its is also illogical to expect Mugabe to openly reveal military plans to his enemies—the apartheid regime and their Western allies—in the media, especially knowing that the ANC and its leaders were labelled terrorists by the U.S., U.K., and the broader Western world. Therefore, Mugabe could not publicly admit to assisting “terrorists” in armed operations against a sovereign state, as it would have been considered a breach of international law. This was despite the reality that he was already fighting two wars agaist the apartheid government in Matebeleland and Mozambique, after the apartheid government attacked Zimbabwe.

Rutendo Matinyarare

10,781 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Our ‘international airport’ had an in-depth interview with the British media in 1985. It was at the height of the apartheid state brutality and repression. He led a massive international campaign for comprehensive sanctions against the apartheid regime. The year 1985 marked a pivotal escalation in South Africa’s anti-apartheid struggle, characterised by widespread mass protests, labor strikes, and intensified township resistance. By June, the UN Security Council urged member states to impose sanctions against the apartheid regime, precipitating a deepening political crisis. In response, PW Botha proclaimed a state of emergency to avert systemic collapse. The European Community and Commonwealth nations duly responded with economic sanctions. Until this moment, the US had extended unconditional political and economic backing to apartheid South Africa. It was only in 1986 under international pressure that the US imposed stricter economic measures against the apartheid regime. Winnie Mandela had been banished to Brandfort in the Free State. She defied the banning order and returned to Soweto to spearhead grassroots resistance against the regime. From 1985 onward, apartheid began to unravel. The state despite its attempts repression, it increasingly could not sustain its legitimacy and political stability. The real turning point came when FW de Klerk replaced PW Botha in 1989 and moved to open negotiations. In 1990, the ANC and other liberation organisations were unbanned, and Mandela was released from prison. Subsequent negotiations culminated in a transitional settlement wherein the enfeebled apartheid criminals ceded political power to the ANC while retaining de facto dominance over the economy. This negotiated criminal structure still persists today. Economic power remains concentrated among historical beneficiaries of the apartheid regime. Our economic liberation was sold at the negotiations table. Winnie Madikizela-Mandela did say that she felt betrayed. Chris Hani too opposed the negotiations and was murdered.

Our ‘international airport’ had an in-depth interview with the British media in 1985. It was at the height of the apartheid state brutality and repression. He led a massive international campaign for comprehensive sanctions against the apartheid regime. The year 1985 marked a pivotal escalation in South Africa’s anti-apartheid struggle, characterised by widespread mass protests, labor strikes, and intensified township resistance. By June, the UN Security Council urged member states to impose sanctions against the apartheid regime, precipitating a deepening political crisis. In response, PW Botha proclaimed a state of emergency to avert systemic collapse. The European Community and Commonwealth nations duly responded with economic sanctions. Until this moment, the US had extended unconditional political and economic backing to apartheid South Africa. It was only in 1986 under international pressure that the US imposed stricter economic measures against the apartheid regime. Winnie Mandela had been banished to Brandfort in the Free State. She defied the banning order and returned to Soweto to spearhead grassroots resistance against the regime. From 1985 onward, apartheid began to unravel. The state despite its attempts repression, it increasingly could not sustain its legitimacy and political stability. The real turning point came when FW de Klerk replaced PW Botha in 1989 and moved to open negotiations. In 1990, the ANC and other liberation organisations were unbanned, and Mandela was released from prison. Subsequent negotiations culminated in a transitional settlement wherein the enfeebled apartheid criminals ceded political power to the ANC while retaining de facto dominance over the economy. This negotiated criminal structure still persists today. Economic power remains concentrated among historical beneficiaries of the apartheid regime. Our economic liberation was sold at the negotiations table. Winnie Madikizela-Mandela did say that she felt betrayed. Chris Hani too opposed the negotiations and was murdered.

Sentletse 🇿🇦🇷🇺🇵🇸🇱🇧

39,424 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

"Gimme Hope Jo'anna" is an anti-apartheid song by Guyanese-British musician Eddy Grant, released in 1988. The song, which refers to Johannesburg ("Jo'anna") as a symbol of the apartheid system in South Africa, was banned by the South African government at the time but became a popular, optimistic plea for change with a danceable melody that offered hope for a better future.

"Gimme Hope Jo'anna" is an anti-apartheid song by Guyanese-British musician Eddy Grant, released in 1988. The song, which refers to Johannesburg ("Jo'anna") as a symbol of the apartheid system in South Africa, was banned by the South African government at the time but became a popular, optimistic plea for change with a danceable melody that offered hope for a better future.

History ZAR

58,608 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

AMERICANS TAUGHT DISTORTED HISTORY OF SLAVERY Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, it remains a stubborn myth that the North of the US was not involved in slavery. The prevailing narrative is that slavery was only deeply entrenched in the societal fabric of the South. In this clip, speaking in support of H.R. 40, a bill proposing a commission to study reparations for slavery, filmmaker Katrina Browne, a Philadelphia native, explains how the North was complicit in slavery. Along with nine relatives, Browne retraced her own family journey, discovering that they were the largest slave-trading family in US history - transporting over 12,000 Africans to the Americas in chains. She recounts that learning the history of her Rhode-Island ancestors led to the realisation that the only reason most Americans are ignorant of the North’s slave history is because Americans are taught a distorted version of history. Browne spotlights facts that contradict the idea that the North had little involvement, including the fact that Rhode Island, where her family roots lie, sent more ships to Africa in the European slave trade than any other state in the slave business, which spanned across centuries. A wide array of industries in the North profited as a result - from shipping to finance - meaning that slavery was largely responsible for the economic rise of the US as a whole. Browne ended by stating that an understanding of true history should come with acceptance of the realities of what Black people were subjected to at the hands of White enslavers. She said that what Black people want is true understanding and repair, which must encompass meaningful solutions such as reparations to rectify the injustices, not revenge. Video Credit:

AMERICANS TAUGHT DISTORTED HISTORY OF SLAVERY Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, it remains a stubborn myth that the North of the US was not involved in slavery. The prevailing narrative is that slavery was only deeply entrenched in the societal fabric of the South. In this clip, speaking in support of H.R. 40, a bill proposing a commission to study reparations for slavery, filmmaker Katrina Browne, a Philadelphia native, explains how the North was complicit in slavery. Along with nine relatives, Browne retraced her own family journey, discovering that they were the largest slave-trading family in US history - transporting over 12,000 Africans to the Americas in chains. She recounts that learning the history of her Rhode-Island ancestors led to the realisation that the only reason most Americans are ignorant of the North’s slave history is because Americans are taught a distorted version of history. Browne spotlights facts that contradict the idea that the North had little involvement, including the fact that Rhode Island, where her family roots lie, sent more ships to Africa in the European slave trade than any other state in the slave business, which spanned across centuries. A wide array of industries in the North profited as a result - from shipping to finance - meaning that slavery was largely responsible for the economic rise of the US as a whole. Browne ended by stating that an understanding of true history should come with acceptance of the realities of what Black people were subjected to at the hands of White enslavers. She said that what Black people want is true understanding and repair, which must encompass meaningful solutions such as reparations to rectify the injustices, not revenge. Video Credit:

African Stream

53,150 просмотров • 1 год назад

Nelson Mandela On Why He Supported Gaddafi And Castro In 1948, a right-wing party rose to power in South Africa, led by the country’s white minority. What followed was a decades-long period of systemic violence against South Africa's black majority. This period, known as apartheid, ended in 1994 with the victory of the revolutionary African National Congress (ANC) party, and the election of its 27-years imprisoned activist Nelson Mandela (1918 - 2013) as South Africa’s first freely-elected president. During the decades of struggle, the ANC had sought help from the international community. The “free” nations of the West would not help. The United States and Britain would not help. Only “undemocratic” nations like Libya, Cuba and Palestine answered the call, providing military, medical and financial assistance to the anti-apartheid forces. In this interview with PBS News in the year of his release from prison, Nelson Mandela defends his support of Cuban leader Fidel Castro and Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi in the face of allegations of “human rights abuses” leveled against the governments of both leaders by the West - the same West which for so long had so little to say about the very real human rights abuses perpetrated by the apartheid government, and which actively supported apartheid.

Nelson Mandela On Why He Supported Gaddafi And Castro In 1948, a right-wing party rose to power in South Africa, led by the country’s white minority. What followed was a decades-long period of systemic violence against South Africa's black majority. This period, known as apartheid, ended in 1994 with the victory of the revolutionary African National Congress (ANC) party, and the election of its 27-years imprisoned activist Nelson Mandela (1918 - 2013) as South Africa’s first freely-elected president. During the decades of struggle, the ANC had sought help from the international community. The “free” nations of the West would not help. The United States and Britain would not help. Only “undemocratic” nations like Libya, Cuba and Palestine answered the call, providing military, medical and financial assistance to the anti-apartheid forces. In this interview with PBS News in the year of his release from prison, Nelson Mandela defends his support of Cuban leader Fidel Castro and Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi in the face of allegations of “human rights abuses” leveled against the governments of both leaders by the West - the same West which for so long had so little to say about the very real human rights abuses perpetrated by the apartheid government, and which actively supported apartheid.

The Spearhead

11,164 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Maye Musk is a stone-cold Nazi who ran away from South Africa when apartheid fell because she was terrified of Black people taking over the government. This entire family is toxic, racist, deviant trash that should never have been allowed in America.

Maye Musk is a stone-cold Nazi who ran away from South Africa when apartheid fell because she was terrified of Black people taking over the government. This entire family is toxic, racist, deviant trash that should never have been allowed in America.

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

677,890 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

📺When We Were Black (2006) A seminal moment in South African television. Emerging in the early years of post-apartheid broadcasting, the series reopened the psychic and political wounds of black life under apartheid, using the intimacy of television to re-stage a national trauma. This scene captures the essence of what the show set out to do to make visible the quiet violences of apartheid that lived in the body, the home, the street. It’s not an act of physical brutality that shocks us here, but the psychic one the destruction of dignity, the forced performance of inferiority, the way the state choreographed humiliation as a means of control. To me the humiliation of Fisto’s father becomes a meditation on Black masculinity. Under apartheid, manhood was systematically stripped of authority and autonomy. In this scene, the father’s forced “dance” becomes a metaphor for survival under surveillance how Black men had to contort themselves to stay alive, even as they lost face in front of their children. Yet in showing that collapse, the series dignifies it naming the pain that shaped generations of fathers and sons. Nearly twenty years later, the scene still lands like a gut punch.

📺When We Were Black (2006) A seminal moment in South African television. Emerging in the early years of post-apartheid broadcasting, the series reopened the psychic and political wounds of black life under apartheid, using the intimacy of television to re-stage a national trauma. This scene captures the essence of what the show set out to do to make visible the quiet violences of apartheid that lived in the body, the home, the street. It’s not an act of physical brutality that shocks us here, but the psychic one the destruction of dignity, the forced performance of inferiority, the way the state choreographed humiliation as a means of control. To me the humiliation of Fisto’s father becomes a meditation on Black masculinity. Under apartheid, manhood was systematically stripped of authority and autonomy. In this scene, the father’s forced “dance” becomes a metaphor for survival under surveillance how Black men had to contort themselves to stay alive, even as they lost face in front of their children. Yet in showing that collapse, the series dignifies it naming the pain that shaped generations of fathers and sons. Nearly twenty years later, the scene still lands like a gut punch.

Ms.

84,950 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад